Commons:Deletion requests/Files found with bournemouth youtube
Files found with Special:Search/bournemouth youtube[edit]
Sourced to AFC Bournemouth's YouTube channel, which has a blanket CC license for all its videos, but match footage belongs to the league and its licensed broadcasters. The club only owns its original content (i.e. interviews, behind the scenes footage etc), not match footage.
- File:Dominic Solanke 9 AFC Bournemouth.png
- File:Matt Wells at AFC Bournemouth.png
- File:Tosin Adarabioyo 16 Fulham FC b.png
- File:Tosin Adarabioyo 16 Fulham FC c.png
- File:Tosin Adarabioyo 16 Fulham FC a.png
- File:Harrison Reed 6 Fulham FC.png
Adeletron 3030 (talk) 13:07, 26 August 2022 (UTC)
- And I'd like to revisit File:Liam Delap CC video screenshot.png. It's sourced to AFC Bournemouth, but the it's the same shared Carabao Cup footage with the club's own commentators. The club owns the audio, but not the video. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 13:14, 26 August 2022 (UTC)
- Agree. The Dominic Solanke one for example is a screenshot from at least two videos showing the same highlights but for some reason the commentators audio can't be heard from both Fulham's and Bournemouth's channels making the videos identical to each other.
- Also by looking at "File:Steve Cooper.jpg", that file is reviewed by Dudek1337, I don't see that info on any of those listed here excluding the Liam Delap picture which was reviewed by a different user. Iggy the Swan (talk) 15:50, 26 August 2022 (UTC)
Do not delete. The uploaded images pass all guidelines of (licence) verifiability. The unsourced reason to delete them does not meet te verifiability guidelines. According to Wikipedia:Verifiability everything must be verifiable (en:Wikipedia:Verifiability). The copyright of the images I uploaded are verifiable according to the "Guidelines for images and other media files" (en:Wikipedia:Copyrights#Guidelines for images and other_media files). The official AFC Bournemouth YouTube channel has posted video's since 2012 and their video's have not been taken down by YouTube. We/I dont have access to their standard (license) contracts and/or addidional (license) contracts. Please provide a verifiable claim to the copyright concerns or don't delete the images. — Preceding unsigned comment added by FlippyFlink (talk • contribs) 09:50, August 29, 2022 (UTC)
- @FlippyFlink: Hi, thank you for responding. A few things:
- WP:V is guideline for encyclopedia content on the English Wikipedia. It's entirely irrelevant to licensing questions on Commons.
- The reason YouTube hasn't taken the video down is because the EFL generally allows clubs to post match footage on their sites and social media content. The question is whether it is licensed correctly on YouTube.
- COM:License laundering is something that can happen intentionally or unintentionally, where a YouTube user takes copyrighted content and assigns a free license. Even if YouTube shows a Creative Commons license, if the source material is copyrighted, then the resulting work is considered copyrighted.
- Sure, we don't have access to the EFL's media contract terms. But we follow COM:PCP, specifically, #4. Not knowing who really owns the footage isn't a reason to keep an image. If there's doubt, the onus is on the uploader to show that the content is actually free to use. Since we have a pretty good idea that match footage belongs to the EFL, it's up to you to show that AFC Bouremouth correctly licensed the video.
- I hope this answers your questions. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 16:27, 29 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:08, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
Files found with Special:Search/bournemouth youtube[edit]
Same as above - content created by the club is fine, match footage is not.
Adeletron 3030 (talk) 18:42, 2 November 2023 (UTC)
- Really... I mean he is a prominent footballer in a country where football sadly isnt very well covered, and he just made history for the Pakistan national team as staten in his Wikipedia page. As staten by FlippyFlink, the uploaded image clearly pass the guidelines of license verifiability. I really struggled to find an image of him watching the whole match for nearly 2 hours and the image in question is just a mere screenshot of a fraction of the whole video lasting just a few seconds as I precisely stated in the source section. I will eagerly wait for the conclusion of the discussion but this is just straight up disheartening. Throwawayjamal047 (talk) 00:57, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; there must be other videos on QPR's channel that show him. —holly {chat} 19:06, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
Files found with Special:Search/bournemouth youtube[edit]
Same as the above deletions, AFC Bournemouth does not create or own match footage.
Adeletron 3030 (talk) 17:35, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:50, 13 February 2024 (UTC)