Commons:Valued image candidates

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Shortcut: COM:VIC

Skip to image nominations Skip to image nominations Most valued reviews Skip to most valued reviews Skip to set nominations Skip to set nominations

These are the candidates to become valued images. Please note that this is not the same as featured pictures or quality images. If you simply want some feedback on your pictures you can get that at photography critiques.

Single images can be proposed for valued image (VI) status. Candidates must be proposed as being the most valuable of all Commons' images within a specified scope. Judging is carried out according to the valued image criteria.

A Most Valued Review (MVR) is opened where there are two or more candidates competing within essentially the same scope.

The rules for promotion can be found at Commons:Valued image candidates/Promotion rules.

An image which has previously been declined can be renominated within the same scope only if the issues leading to the original decline have been addressed. Previously nominated images that were closed as "undecided" can be renominated at any time. Once a candidate achieves VI or VIS status it can normally be demoted only if some better candidate replaces it during an MVR.

If you would like to nominate an image for VI status, please do so following the instructions below. If you are proposing a better candidate within essentially the same scope as an image which already has VI status, please open an MVR.

How to nominate an image for VI status[edit]

Nominations will be evaluated using the criteria listed at Commons:Valued image criteria. Please read those criteria before submitting an image to help cut down on the number of candidates that have a low chance of success. Make sure you understand the concept of scope and how to choose the correct scope for your nomination.

Please make sure that your proposed image fulfills all of the necessary criteria before nominating it. For example, if it needs to be geocoded, do that in advance. If no appropriate categories exist, create and link them beforehand. Although some reviewers may help by fixing minor issues during the review process, it is your responsibility as nominator to ensure your image ticks all the necessary boxes before you propose it. If you nominate an image that ignores one of the criteria, don't be surprised if it fails VI review.

Adding a new nomination (image)[edit]

Step 1: Copy the image name into this box (excluding the File: prefix), at the end of the text already present in the box, for example, Commons:Valued image candidates/My-image-filename.jpg. Then click on the "Create new nomination" button.


Step 2: Follow the instructions on the page that you are taken to, and save the resulting VIC subpage.

Step 3: Manually add the candidate image towards the end of Commons:Valued image candidates/candidate list (under the heading "New valued image nominations"), as the last parameter in the VICs template. Click here, and append the following line as the last parameter of the relevant section:

|My-image-filename.jpg

so that it looks like this: 

{{VICs
 ...
 |My-image-filename.jpg
}}

and save the candidate list.

Renomination[edit]

Declined VICs can be renominated by any registered user, but only after one or more of the root cause(s) leading to a decline has/have been addressed. Undecided VICs can be renominated as is although it is still recommended to consider and fix issue(s) which may have hindered a promotion of the candidate in the previous review.

Besides fixing issues with the previous nomination the following procedure shall be followed upon renomination.

Step 1: Edit the candidate subpage you intend to renominate. All declined and undecided VICs are placed in either Category:Declined valued image candidates, or Category:Undecided valued image candidates and sorted by the date of the previous nomination.

Step 2: Replace the previous nomination date and time by pasting in 

|date={{subst:VI-time}}

Step 3: Replace the "undecided" or "declined" status with "nominated" (or "discussed" if you intend to add it to a Most Valued Review).

Step 4: If the previous nominator was a different user replace the nominator parameter with 

|nominator=~~~

Step 5: If the candidate does not already have an archive link to previous reviews: Create one using the following procedure.

  • Cut the text in the previous review section (leave the closing braces "}}")
  • replace the review parameter with
|review=
{{subst:VIC-archive}}
}}
  • Save the page.
  • There is now a red link to Previous reviews. Click the link to create the archive subpage and paste in the previous reviews.
  • Save the previous reviews archive page

Step 6: Add the candidate to the candidates list.

How to open a Most Valued Review[edit]

There must be at least two candidates competing within essentially the same scope to open an MVR. Each needs its own VIC subpage, which should be created as above if it does not already exist, but with status set to "discussed". Then, add the following section at the end of the page Commons:Valued image candidates/Most valued review candidate list: 

=== Scope ===
{{VICs
  |candidate1.jpg
  |candidate2.jpg
}}

where Scope is the scope of both images, and candidate1.jpg and candidate2.jpg are the respective candidates. If need be, also remove the relevant image(s) from the list in Pending valued image candidates

If one of the candidates is an existing VI within essentially the same scope, the original VIC subpage is re-opened for voting by changing its status to status=discussed and new reviews are appended to the original VIC subpage. However, any original votes are not counted within the MVR.

The status parameter of each candidate should remain set to "discussed" while the MVR is ongoing.

How to review the candidates[edit]

How to review an image[edit]

Any registered user can review the valued image candidates. Comments are welcome from everyone, but neither the nominator nor the original image author may vote (that does not exclude voting from users who have edited the image with a view to improving it).

Nominations should be evaluated using the criteria listed at Commons:Valued image criteria. Please read those and the page on scope carefully before reviewing. Reviewing here is a serious business, and a reviewer who just breezes by to say "I like it!" is not adding anything of value. You need to spend the time to check the nomination against every one of the six VI criteria, and you also need to carry out searches to satisfy yourself on the "most valuable" criterion.

Review procedure[edit]

  • On the review page the image is presented in the review size. You are welcome to view the image in full resolution by following the image links, but bear in mind that it is the appearance of the image at review size which matters.
  • Check the candidate carefully against each of the six VI criteria. The criteria are mandatory, and to succeed the candidate has to satisfy all six.
  • Use the where used field, if provided, to study the current usage of the candidate in Wikimedia projects. If you find usage of interest do add relevant links to the nomination.
  • Look for other images of the same kind of subject by following the links to relevant categories in the image page, and to any Commons galleries.
    • If you find another image which is already a VI within essentially the same scope, the candidate and the existing VI should be moved to Most Valued Review (MVR) to determine which one is the more valued.
    • If you find one or more other images which in your opinion are equally or more valued images within essentially the same scope, you should nominate these images as well and move all the candidates to an MVR.
  • Once you have made up your mind, edit the review page and add your vote or comment to the review parameter as follows:
You type You get When
*{{Comment}} My Comment. -- ~~~~ You have a comment.
*{{Info}} My information. -- ~~~~ You have information.
*{{Neutral}} Reason for neutral vote. -- ~~~~
  •  Neutral Reason for neutral vote. -- Example
 You are uncertain or wish to record a neutral vote.
*{{Oppose}} Reason for opposing vote. -- ~~~~
  •  Oppose Reason for opposing vote. -- Example
 You think that the candidate fails one or more of the six mandatory criteria.
*{{Question}} My question. -- ~~~~ You have a question.
*{{Support}} Reason for supporting. -- ~~~~
  •  Support Reason for supporting. -- Example
 You think that the candidate meets all of the six mandatory criteria.
  • If the nomination fails one of the six criteria, but in a way that can be fixed, you can optionally let the nominator know what needs to be done using the {{VIF}} template.
  • Your comment goes immediately before the final closing braces "}}" on the page.
How to update the status
  • Finally, change the status of the nomination if appropriate:
    • status=nominated When no votes or only neutral votes have been added to the review field (blue image border).
    • status=supported When there is at least one {{Support}} vote but no {{Oppose}} votes (light green image border).
    • status=opposed When there is at least one {{Oppose}} vote but no {{Support}} votes (red image border).
    • status=discussed When there is at least one {{Oppose}} vote and one {{Support}} vote (yellow image border).


Remember the criteria: 1. Most valuable 2. Suitable scope 3. Illustrates well 4. Fully described 5. Geocoded 6. Well categorized.

Changes in scope during the review period[edit]

The nominator is allowed to make changes in scope as the review proceeds, for example in response to reviewer votes or comments. Whenever a scope is changed the nominator should post a signed comment at the bottom of the review area using {{VIC-scope-change|old scope|new scope|--~~~~}}, and should also leave a note on the talk page of all existing voters asking them to reconsider their vote. A support vote made before the change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn.

You can submit new nominations starting on COM:VIC.

Pending valued image candidates[edit]

Refresh page for new nominations: purge this page's cache
55,044 closed valued image candidates
 Closed as Nominations 
Promoted
  
 49,482 (89.9%) 
Undecided
  
 3,072 (5.6%) 
Declined
  
 2,490 (4.5%) 


New valued image nominations[edit]

   

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Pierre André (talk) on 2024-05-11 10:32 (UTC)
Scope:
Virgen de la Asunta, Cathédrale Notre-Dame d'Arequipa, Peru
Used in:
Global usage
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
--Thi (talk) 18:22, 11 May 2024 (UTC) on 2024-05-11 18:22 (UTC)[reply]
Scope:
Approved gravestone emblems of the United States Department of Veterans Affairs – Latin (Christian) Cross
Used in:
en:United States Department of Veterans Affairs emblems for headstones and markers
Reason:
The US Department of Veterans Affairs permits graphics on government-furnished headstones that are approved emblems of belief. This is USVA emblem 01. -- --Thi (talk) 18:22, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Thi (talk) on 2024-05-11 18:26 (UTC)
Scope:
Approved gravestone emblems of the United States Department of Veterans Affairs – Buddhist
Used in:
en:United States Department of Veterans Affairs emblems for headstones and markers, en:Dharmachakra
Open for review.

View promotion
Nominated by:
iMahesh (talk) on 2024-05-12 11:14 (UTC)
Scope:
Starboard Bow view of MV Maa
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:11, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Alexander-93 (talk) on 2024-05-12 12:24 (UTC)
Scope:
Mini Hatch (F66) - right front view
Used in:
de:Kleinwagen, de:Mini F66
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:11, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Alexander-93 (talk) on 2024-05-12 12:28 (UTC)
Scope:
Tesla Model S Plaid - right front view
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Contributor2020Talk to me here! 13:05, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Pierre André (talk) on 2024-05-12 14:56 (UTC)
Scope:
Dome of Iglesia Santa Isabel, Pucará, Peru
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:12, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Gzen92 (talk) on 2024-05-12 15:17 (UTC)
Scope:
Ill lock of Canal de Colmar

 Best in Scope--Alexander-93 (talk) 17:38, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:12, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Alexander-93 (talk) on 2024-05-12 17:35 (UTC)
Scope:
Benarrow PB 5 - left rear view
Used in:
de:Benarrow
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:12, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Charlesjsharp (talk) on 2024-05-12 18:28 (UTC)
Scope:
Damaliscus pygargus phillipsi (Blesbok) head
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:13, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Charlesjsharp (talk) on 2024-05-12 18:30 (UTC)
Scope:
Damaliscus pygargus phillipsi (Blesbok) juvenile
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:13, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Charlesjsharp (talk) on 2024-05-12 20:47 (UTC)
Scope:
Sylvicapra grimmia (Common duiker) female, jumping
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:13, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) on 2024-05-13 04:06 (UTC)
Scope:
St. Simon und Juda church in Trier Icon Mary and child in the church.
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:13, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-05-13 05:09 (UTC)
Scope:
Ancient Roman statues in the Museo archeologico nazionale (Venice) - Zeus
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:14, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-05-13 05:10 (UTC)
Scope:
The ordination of Saint Martin by Master of Riofrío Musée Goya, Castres France
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:14, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-05-13 05:11 (UTC)
Scope:
Well heads in Campo San Provolo, Venice
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:14, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Pierre André (talk) on 2024-05-13 09:13 (UTC)
Scope:
Reliefs of the Terrace of the Elephants, Angkor Thom (Cambodia)
Used in:
Global usage
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Nikride (talk) on 2024-05-13 09:21 (UTC)
Scope:
Monument to Chornobyl disaster liquidators, Volodarka
Used in:
Global usage
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Giles Laurent (talk) on 2024-05-13 11:09 (UTC)
Scope:
Syncerus caffer (African buffalo) skull, decomposing
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Giles Laurent (talk) on 2024-05-13 11:47 (UTC)
Scope:
Château de Gruyères, aerial view from north east side
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Pierre André (talk) on 2024-05-13 16:39 (UTC)
Scope:
Église Saint-Pierre d'Ault, view from rue du 11 Novembre (France)
Used in:
Global usage
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) on 2024-05-14 04:16 (UTC)
Scope:
Roman bridge, Trier Masonry piers, protected upstream by stone front pipes. (South side)
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-05-14 05:03 (UTC)
Scope:
San Cristoforo by Stefano Veneziano - Correr Museum
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-05-14 05:05 (UTC)
Scope:
Église Saint-Pierre de Blagnac, France - Le monument aux morts (The war memorial)
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-05-14 05:06 (UTC)
Scope:
Campo San Provolo (Venice), southern exposure
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Pierre André (talk) on 2024-05-14 09:28 (UTC)
Scope:
Église Saint-Pierre d'Ault.- Statue de Saint Pierre assis en pape, (Fr)
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
grendel|khan on 2024-05-14 09:57 (UTC)
Scope:
Pratt & Whitney J58
Used in:
many, including en:Pratt & Whitney J58
Reason:
Looks to be the de facto picture of this engine in most places. -- grendel|khan
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Giles Laurent (talk) on 2024-05-14 09:59 (UTC)
Scope:
Ispidina picta (African pygmy kingfisher)
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Giles Laurent (talk) on 2024-05-14 10:12 (UTC)
Scope:
Halcyon leucocephala (Grey-headed kingfisher)
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
--Thi (talk) 10:26, 14 May 2024 (UTC) on 2024-05-14 10:26 (UTC)[reply]
Scope:
"A man may be down but he's never out!" – poster by Frederick Duncan
Used in:
fi:Pelastusarmeija (Salvation Army)
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Thi (talk) on 2024-05-14 10:32 (UTC)
Scope:
The Funeral of Shelley
Used in:
en:Percy Bysshe Shelley, en:Romantic poetry, en:Louis Édouard Fournier, en:Edward John Trelawny, en:Leigh Hunt

 Best in Scope--Alexander-93 (talk) 18:31, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Pierre André (talk) on 2024-05-14 16:32 (UTC)
Scope:
Musée Louvre-Lens Fragment du palais de Darius, Galerie du Temps (2013)

 Comment Très sombre mais facile de corriger. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:21, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) on 2024-05-14 17:39 (UTC)
Scope:
Window in the wall of the Reformierte Kirche Vnà South side.
Used in:
Cultural property of national significance in Switzerland
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Alexander-93 (talk) on 2024-05-14 18:30 (UTC)
Scope:
Wang Chuanfu
Used in:
arz:وانج تشوانفو, be:Ван Чуаньфу, de:BYD, de:Liste der Biografien/Wan, de:Wang Chuanfu, en:BYD Company, en:Wang Chuanfu...

* Support Useful & used. -- Giles Laurent (talk) 11:19, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Support Thank you ! Useful & used -- Giles Laurent (talk) 13:00, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Nikride (talk) on 2024-05-14 19:25 (UTC)
Scope:
Memorial sign to victims of Holodomor and political repressions in Volodarka
Used in:
Global usage
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-05-15 05:01 (UTC)
Scope:
Ancient Roman statues in the Museo archeologico nazionale (Venice) - Asklepios 28/A
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-05-15 05:06 (UTC)
Scope:
Saint Mary Magdalene by Alejo de Vahía Musée Goya of Castres
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-05-15 05:07 (UTC)
Scope:
The well in the large cloister of the Church of Santa Caterina in Treviso
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2024-05-15 05:11 (UTC)
Scope:
Cerithium citrinum (Yellow Cerith), shell, juvenile
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Romainbehar (talk) on 2024-05-15 08:56 (UTC)
Scope:
Golden statue of Virgin Mary of Fourvière
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Giles Laurent (talk) on 2024-05-15 10:55 (UTC)
Scope:
Cinnyris chloropygius (Olive-bellied sunbird) flying to a flower
  • I am not in favour of this scope. We have well established formats and I see no need to change. Just upload a cropped version. Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:30, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    I think this picture has more educational value without a crop because it allows to observe the animal behavior : we can see from what flower it comes from and to what flower it is going. We can even see it looking at it to choose it before landing on it. So I think this scope is also more interesting than simply flying because it shows an animal behavior while flying. -- Giles Laurent (talk) 23:35, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Giles Laurent (talk) on 2024-05-15 11:01 (UTC)
Scope:
Buteo augur (Augur buzzard) in flight, top feathers view
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Nikride (talk) on 2024-05-15 19:46 (UTC)
Scope:
Monument to Taras Shevchenko in Volodarka
Used in:
Global usage
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) on 2024-05-16 04:07 (UTC)
Scope:
St. Simon und Juda church in Trier Detail of the front of the church.
Used in:
Cultural property of national significance in Switzerland
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
WildMouse76 (talk) on 2024-05-16 04:14 (UTC)
Scope:
Mountains at sunset in Nepal - Mount Everest
@Archaeodontosaurus done WildMouse76 (talk) 14:50, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-05-16 05:03 (UTC)
Scope:
Ancient Roman busts in the Museo archeologico nazionale (Venice) - Tyche

 Support Best in scope and used --Llez (talk) 07:31, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-05-16 05:05 (UTC)
Scope:
The Charity of Saint Martin by Master of Riofrío Musée Goya, Castres France
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-05-16 05:06 (UTC)
Scope:
Commemorative plaque in memory of Christian Doppler in Venice
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2024-05-16 07:28 (UTC)
Scope:
Cerithium balteatum (Girdled Cerith), shell
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Pierre André (talk) on 2024-05-16 09:31 (UTC)
Scope:
Musée Louvre-Lens Fragment de lachapelle du Saint-Sépulcre, Galerie du Temps (2013)

 Best in Scope--Alexander-93 (talk) 13:40, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Tupungato (talk) on 2024-05-16 11:53 (UTC)
Scope:
Furniture restorer (Relevant category: Furniture restoration)
Used in:
en:Conservation and restoration of cultural property, en:Antique furniture and 14 other
Reason:
A few similar images are diluted across many categories in Commons, but I believe it's the best in scope nonetheless. -- Tupungato (talk)
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Tupungato (talk) on 2024-05-16 12:30 (UTC)
Scope:
Irrigation sprinklers in vineyards (Relevant categories: Irrigation sprinklers, Vineyards)
Used in:
en:Irrigation sprinkler, tr:Şarapçılık and 21 other
Reason:
I believe Irrigation sprinklers in vineyards is a super useful scope, but there is no perfect Commons category for this. Commons category tree for agriculture infrastructure is somewhat neglected. -- Tupungato (talk)
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Giles Laurent (talk) on 2024-05-16 12:54 (UTC)
Scope:
Fratercula arctica (Atlantic puffin) in flight, returning with fishes
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Alexander-93 (talk) on 2024-05-16 13:38 (UTC)
Scope:
Tesla Model S Plaid - left rear view
Used in:
de:Tesla Model S
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Lystopad (talk) on 2024-05-16 16:52 (UTC)
Scope:
Stanislav Range Front Light
Reason:
A historical monument of Ukraine located in Kherson Oblast. Now under russian occupation thus its current condition is unknown. -- Lystopad (talk)
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Nikride (talk) on 2024-05-16 19:48 (UTC)
Scope:
Monument to Heavenly Hundred and Heroes of Ukraine, Volodarka
Used in:
Global usage
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
WeatherWriter (talk) on 2024-05-16 22:11 (UTC)
Scope:
Tornadoes of 2020
Used in:
w:2020 Ashby–Dalton tornado, w:Tornadoes of 2020, Tornado de Ashby–Dalton de 2020 (Spanish)
Reason:
Amazing photograph of a tornado during 2020. I believe the best one out of Category:Pictures of tornadoes in 2020 as well as the best image to describe all of w:Tornadoes of 2020. -- WeatherWriter (talk)
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Famberhorst (talk) on 2024-05-17 04:21 (UTC)
Scope:
Lycoperdon utriforme Calvatia utriformis in decay
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-05-17 05:01 (UTC)
Scope:
Ancient Roman busts in the Museo archeologico nazionale (Venice) - Aphrodite
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-05-17 05:03 (UTC)
Scope:
Agriopis leucophaearia – mounted specimen Male dorsal
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-05-17 05:06 (UTC)
Scope:
Here-was-born plaques - Riccardo Selvatico, in Venice
Open for review.



Pending Most valued review candidates[edit]

Au Vieux Paris d'Arcole (Paris)[edit]

   

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Sebring12Hrs (talk) on 2024-03-31 13:46 (UTC)
Scope:
Au Vieux Paris d'Arcole (Paris)
Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 05:43, 15 May 2024 (UTC)

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Sebring12Hrs (talk) on 2024-03-31 13:46 (UTC)
Scope:
Au Vieux Paris d'Arcole (Paris)
Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 05:43, 15 May 2024 (UTC)

African chaffinch taxonomy change[edit]

Bust of Bertrand Russell by Marcelle Quinton, Red Lion Square, London[edit]

   

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
--Thi (talk) 18:48, 23 March 2024 (UTC) on 2024-03-23 18:48 (UTC)[reply]
Scope:
Bust of Bertrand Russell by Marcelle Quinton, Red Lion Square, London
Used in:
en:Bertrand Russell, de, es
I opened the most valued review. 1656321.jpg seems to be taken before the restoration. --Thi (talk) 11:30, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 05:43, 15 May 2024 (UTC)

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
--Thi (talk) 11:27, 12 April 2024 (UTC) on 2024-04-12 11:27 (UTC)[reply]
Scope:
Bust of Bertrand Russell by Marcelle Quinton, Red Lion Square, London

 Comment Ok for the base, but wa can't really see the face. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 21:13, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 05:43, 15 May 2024 (UTC)

Mavathoor Kere (lake) - correction of scope[edit]

To initiate a most valued review, please go to the dedicated MVR sub page.
Refresh page for new nominations: purge this page's cache

All open candidates in an MVR have to have their status set as "discussed" while the review is ongoing. Only when all candidates are due for closure can the MVR be closed.

Refer to Most valued review, the promotion rules and the instructions for closure for details.

Pending valued image set candidates[edit]

Warning This section has been deactivated because of technical issues. Please do not add any VI set candidate.
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Valued_image_candidates&oldid=751225986"