User talk:Yann/archives 54

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search


Why did you delete my abuse filter report?

Without any comment? Once more: The filter hindered my deleting a spam link from File:Bolivian vizcacha.jpg (click the source link to find out!) First, I try to help to clean wikimedia. Then a filter runs wild. Then I try to help once more to report this error. Then you come along and delete my report without any comment. Is this the right way to deal with people who try to help?? 80.187.74.0 08:34, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your report was quite nonsense. I can't any spam on the history of this file. Yann (talk) 09:24, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Did you read what I wrote? There is a viagra spam in the file description, NOT in its history but in its source link! And the filter prevented me from deleting it! And my report was NOT nonsense, I filled out all the required fields. Click the link given in the file description www.alexandrebuisse.org!!! 80.187.74.0 09:36, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hmm. That link was added by the uploader in 2012, and all uploads by this user contain this link. The original link is also a bad site. Now this user didn't edit here since 2017, so I wonder what happened to this user. I cleaned them all. Yann (talk) 09:46, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
May be or not. Resolve it or not. The real problem is that the filter did not allow to change that, which I reported, and that you deleted my report without comment and without even understanding it, which is some kind of vandalism. You did not even apologise. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 80.187.74.0 (talk) 09:54, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Making money from my photos?

How do you mean that I am making money from my photos? Charlesjsharp (talk) 15:01, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Don't you? I don't see anything wrong making money selling pictures. Yann (talk) 13:22, 30 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

IP 112.206.107.90

Hi Yann. IP 112.206.107.90 is back doing the same stuff that led to them being blocked per COM:AN#Commons:Deletion requests/File:Flag of the Torres Strait Islanders.svg. I don't think the IP is going to be stopped by any further warnings or short blocks. Perhaps a longer block (at least until the DR has been closed) or protecting both the file's page and the DR is the only thing that will work. -- Marchjuly (talk) 13:18, 30 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done Blocked for a month. Yann (talk) 13:21, 30 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for taking a look at this. -- Marchjuly (talk) 13:55, 30 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Shah of Iran Mohammad Reza Pahlavi Testing Fighter Jets before taking deliveries of F15 F16

Hi

You could at least give me 12 hours to talk about the file. On the deletion request on my talk page, I don't even see the reason for copyright violation. Shkuru Afshar (talk) 21:08, 1 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This has a Corbis watermark and copyright notice visible. So most probably PD-Iran is not valid. Yann (talk) 21:12, 1 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Yann, Could you kindly give me an update on the mentioned filed PhotoNBH2020, as I have permission from the author to upload it in the commons and the photograph herself sent a mail authorising it. What more has to be done? Thanks! 2001:B07:A99:96D8:D41D:B192:E649:369A 11:37, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There is a pending ticket. Please ask on Commons:Volunteer Response Team/Noticeboard‎ what is happening with this ticket. Yann (talk) 15:52, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

RCU contre "Russian Onest"

Bonjour Yann

J'ai lancé une RCU contre "Russian Onest" vs "Hom Ling Zum" [1]. Mais vu l'ancienneté des dernières contributions de "Hom Ling Zum" (au delà des 3 mois d'archives) je pense qu'il sera difficile de trouver un lien entre eux deux via leurs IP mais peut-être que la RCU fera ressortir d'autres fonés récents. --Poudou99 (talk) 20:37, 6 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Photos nominated for deletion by User:Εὐθυμένης

Hi Yann

The above user has now been blocked for excessive and dubious tagging of images for speedy deletion, including File:Flag of Lusaka.gif, which I specifically contested. This image had a valid licence attached, and at the very least it should have been subject to a standard deletion discussion. Please could you reconsider this one, and also consider undeleting any other images tagged by this user, as there appear to be a lot of issues here. Thanks Amakuru (talk) 13:40, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I blocked this user for creating speedy deletions, even after he was warned not to do so. However most of the files he tagged are probably copyright violations. Par example, there is no free license for File:Flag of Lusaka.gif, and such a complex rendering certainly creates a copyright. If some Commons users recreate the flags, they would be OK, but copying the files from another website is not. Yann (talk) 20:55, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong license

Hi Yann, license changes like this one are not appropriate. Firstly, {{PD-Webb}} refers to a copyright statement that applies exclusively for images published at https://webbtelescope.org/ but you will find this image nowhere on that site. Next, you are arguing in your edit summary that “[t]here is no doubt that the image comes from NASA”. This is not the exclusive work by NASA. The credit line names Judy Schmidt who is neither an employee of NASA, CSA or ESA but a volunteer who creates images from raw data in her free time, see here for more info about her. Hence, the CC-BY-2.0 license is correct. I've fixed this. Regards, AFBorchert (talk) 07:01, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

OK, thanks. Yann (talk) 13:43, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

False claim of Sockpuppets

Dear Yann, I read this message about sockpuppets by user eien20. However, those other accounts are not mine. So it is wrong to falsely claim otherwise. I only use Artanisen on Wikipedia. Sometimes I use Wikipedia as a guest. Please compare the IP addresses, because these are most likely different. What can be done about this? -Artanisen (talk) 14:35, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Yann, I've been on Wikipedia for over 17 years and didn't have such an issue before. I didn't know what sockpuppet was exactly until I read the false allegation. Can you please check and remove the category? Because I sincerely have nothing to do with those accounts. -Artanisen (talk) 19:24, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done Yann (talk) 19:28, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your help Yann. Could you also please close the discussion on Commons? If you have any questions please let me know. -Artanisen (talk) 19:32, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I will let others do that. Yann (talk) 19:44, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

restore request

hi, I am writing to ask you if by chance you could restore these two Files whose copyright has expired for more than a hundred years since they are two portraits of Cardinals from the XVIII Century and which were canceled for no reason whatsoever since I think they returned to the right parameters.

Ulcarco77 (talk) 14:14, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done Yann (talk) 15:18, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Tanks Ulcarco77 (talk) 15:21, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Name Change

Hello, Your help is needed with name change here. It needs to undergo name change. -Abhinav619

@Abhinav619: It is used on Wikisource, so it can't be renamed without renaming also the pages there. I created a redirect. Yann (talk) 10:05, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour / bonsoir Yann. ;) L'IP est trop véloce pour réclamer la suppression de ce fichier. On peut voir ici que la photo a bien été créée en Italie : https://www.gettyimages.co.uk/detail/news-photo/nadine-et-jean-louis-trintignant-lors-dune-conf%C3%A9rence-de-news-photo/1128236988 Racconish est intervenu exactement dans le même cadre et a donné son analyse sur le même type de problème avec une autre photo en Italie et estime qu'il faut conserver : https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:DeFunes-Dynam-1965-Italie.jpg Merci. Tisourcier (talk) 19:43, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oui, mais ce qui compte, c'est le lieu de la première publication. Pour des acteurs français pris en photo par une agence de presse française, c'est probablement la France, à moins de la preuve du contraire. Yann (talk) 19:46, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Probablement ? Et pour quelle raison des journalistes et photographes italiens ne se seraient-ils pas déplacés pour couvrir cette conférence qui se déroule en Italie ?
La création a bien été réalisée en Italie par l'agence italienne Gamma-Rapho. Une nouvelle fois, Racconish qui est bien plus qualifié que moi, a déjà tranché ce sujet. Tisourcier (talk) 19:53, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Bon voilà : Commons:Deletion requests/File:Trint-couple.jpg. Yann (talk) 19:59, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Merci beaucoup de l'aide Yann ! Souvent, à force de se laisser aller, certaines IP voulant contribuer plus ou moins sincèrement, désorganisent considérablement l'encyclopédie. Je vous admire pour la patience que vous déployez tous les jours durant des heures... Bon courage. ;) Tisourcier (talk) 20:02, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

hello Yann,

hello Yann,

may i ask why you removed this file: Former flag of Wajir County.gif? was there a takedown request? the flag is of a government body and the use of it on this site is clearly educational. many places/public bodies are quite happy to receive attention via their flags. in fact, that interest is driving flag adoption in many cases. Shorepine (talk) 04:29, 18 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Shorepine: Works from government bodies are not automatically in the public domain. It depends on the body and country of origin. In addition, the original design may be in the public domain, but not the rendering. File:Former flag of Wajir County.gif is a complex design, it is copied from another website, so it is certainly under a copyright. Please note that SVG should be used rather than GIF. If you recreate it yourself in SVG, it may be OK. Yann (talk) 07:02, 18 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
the existence of a copyright means the owner retains the right to prohibit certain uses; it doesn't imply that they can be assumed to have the interest or desire to prohibit any use of their ip by others. that would be silly. musicians are quite happy to have their music played on the radio, at weddings, even political rallies. when they are not happy with certain uses, they issue a cease and desist order. there is no presumption that any use by others is prohibited. they retain the right to determine what uses are permitted and which are not - subject to certain legal restraints on even that right, depending on municipal law. so why assume government entities are interested in prohibiting the reproduction of their images for educational purposes? or that they even can, legally? Shorepine (talk) 08:03, 18 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Shorepine: Copyright doesn't work like that. Radios have to pay royalties to musicians to play their music. Other uses may be fair use, but that's not allowed on Commons. On Commons, we need a free license, allowing any use for any purpose, including commercial ones. Nowadays there is a copyright on almost everything, and it is the uploader's duty to show that a file is within Commons acceptable licenses. Yann (talk) 08:52, 18 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
no, musicians decide if the radio has to pay or not. that's how copyright works. my understanding is that it is okay to upload to commons with the permission of the rights holder. some expressly grant this, even if within certain limitations. Shorepine (talk) 19:04, 18 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Demande de suppression de Françoise Huguier

Bonjour Yann, la photographe Françoise Huguier dont j’ai réalisé le portrait en août 2022 au Festival Visa pour l'Image File:Françoise Huguier par Claude Truong-Ngoc Août 2022.jpg m’a enjoint, sur mon compte Instagram, de retirer sa photo.

Bien entendu, cette photo n’a pas été volée, mais réalisée avec son accord lors de l’exposition des ses photos au cours d’une séance de pose à l’issue de laquelle Mme Huguier a approuvé la photo.

Je l’ai donc invitée à contacter OTRS (permissions-commons-fr@wikimedia.org) afin de formuler une demande motivée, ce qu’elle a fait.

Par pure courtoisie je ne m’oppose pas à cette suppression. Aurais-tu la gentillesse de voir ce qu’il est possible de faire. Avec mes remerciements, Claude Truong-Ngoc (talk) 18:15, 19 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour Yann, Vu la demande à l’équipe de support formulée par Mme Huguier, qui semble mentir quant aux circonstances de la prise de vue de cette photo, (voir Ticket:2023051910008628), je demande finalement la conservation de ma photo. Voir ici le débat, Cordialement, --Claude Truong-Ngoc (talk) 07:48, 20 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Other speedy deletions

Could you please clean up the category? Some of the images have been nominated for too long Trade (talk) 14:40, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding the inclusion of Data:Ncei.noaa.gov/weather.

Recently, it was found that many pages beginning with [Data:Ncei.noaa.gov/weather] were mistakenly deleted, but because many pages still remain. Just to ask, what is the scope of the collection of these data? Fumikas Sagisavas (talk) 06:53, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I first listed these non-US non-NOAA data (without reliable source support) Fumikas Sagisavas (talk) 06:58, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The data of all non-U.S. weather stations may only be "fair use" in NOAA, because NOAA only reproduces the data of these regional weather bureaus.
These non-US sites may be deleted, and I list them below.
Fumikas Sagisavas (talk) 07:14, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Simple data can't be under a copyright. But I am doubtful about the inclusion of this on Commons on COM:SCOPE. Yann (talk) 11:34, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
As raised at Commons:Village_pump#Wrong_deletion: if the Tabular Data facility and namespace isn't for files like these, what is it for? Your input in the discussion at VP would be useful. Jheald (talk) 19:04, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
A file you uploaded is on the main page!

File:Early King James Bible, Octavo, 1615.pdf, that you uploaded, is on the main page today. Thank you for your contributions to this project.

//EatchaBot (talk) 00:01, 25 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Re-uploads

Hi, since you were involved in this previously, I thought I'd bring this to your attention. --2003:C0:8F28:D600:1D39:3BF8:AE2C:DB75 20:56, 26 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as Iranian / Muslim

I really can't see this as a good block.

This is an international project. We have enough difficulty explaining the bulk porn hosting policy to many people in Europe, let alone the US Bible Belt. To have an Iranian IP CfD a couple of the porn categories is not vandalism. They're wrong (a CfD is not appropriate here, on any level), they're out of consensus on the broad porn-hosting question (good luck changing that one!), but this is not vandalism. We have to recognise valid cultural differences and not just shout it down as "vandalism", let alone blocking the account. Why would there ever be any need to do this after just a single action like this? Maybe they are a vandal, maybe they are just trolling (it happens), but we can't (per AGF) act on that basis, from a single event like this.

Maybe French WP outreach projects are different, but I have to work in the UK and this really doesn't help perceptions of Islamophobic bias in WMF, or giving me yet another "anti-Islamic action by the same old Western media" I have to try and explain or make excuses for. Andy Dingley (talk) 12:47, 26 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Whatever is the source country, we don't want people not knowing our policies to create frivolous DRs. We can't have different blocking policies for different people. If we would start this slippery slope, we would go to disaster. Anyway IPs will soon be hidden, so it will be moot quite soon. May be we need another blocking criteria, but whatever you want to call this, this is an appropriate block. And if it were an account, some warnings before a block may be useful, but it doesn't work for IPs. Actually, we should disallow IPs creating DRs, and many other edits. Yann (talk) 15:48, 26 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
In the future could you please list the deletion reason as "creating frivolous deletion requests" as ban reason for such cases? Trade (talk) 16:11, 28 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nikola Tesla 1890 circa

Hi Yann,

I would like to know if we can use the picture of Nikola Tesla that you uploaded for commercial use?

thank you Emipan23 (talk) 09:50, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Emipan23: I can't find the image, but yes, all files on Commons can be used for anything, including commercial purposes. You only have to respect the license for some files (attribution, etc.). If you have more questions, could you provide a link please? Yann (talk) 10:10, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you so much for your quick reply. Here is the image : File:Tesla_circa_1890.jpeg
I just want to be sure that I can use it for commercial purpose (tee shirt) without committing my responsibility.
thank you in advance Emipan23 (talk) 12:20, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Emipan23: This file is in the public domain worldwide, so you can use it as you like. Yann (talk) 12:24, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Perfect! Thanks Yann Emipan23 (talk) 12:28, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Images

Hi Yann, each of the images belong to and have been taken by Alvarez Gallery and its owner Fernando Alvarez. They are copyright free. ElizabMarin (talk) 21:17, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@ElizabMarin: As they are not taken by you, please ask the copyright holder to send a permission via email. Thanks, Yann (talk) 21:19, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm new to wikimedia and the copyright, so I'm hoping that you may assist me. I originally got the image from http://www.cppcc.gov.cn/zxww/2023/03/11/ARTI1678473252987660.shtml and I assume that the copyright is owned by the CCP. I do understand that if it needs to be deleted, but I do think it would be a shame, since the other image used was from the 1940s and this Tibetan has been ruling Tibet since the Chinese invasion of Tibet, whilst this is a modern version. Topeka-GuyWiki (talk) 12:48, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Topeka-GuyWiki: Hi,
There is currently no license, and it is your responsibility to provide a valid license.
Everything is under a copyright by default, so why do you think this could be under a free license? Yann (talk) 19:53, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Sure, delete it then Topeka-GuyWiki (talk) 10:59, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Fixing Copyright Issues

— Preceding unsigned comment added by RebeccaRwanda (talk • contribs) 14:37, 3 June 2023 (UTC) --RebeccaRwanda (talk) 14:33, 3 June 2023 (UTC) Hi Yann, my apologies because this took so long to be fixed. but I would love to have a chance to learn. I do my contributions mostly in translation but I uploaded these Images in different occasions of different local contests for example Wiki Gap etc.. Some of the Images I took my self others I collected from the original owner yes kindly please if any way I can get help to fix it Kindly assist me..User:RebeccaRwanda[reply]

License issue

Hello! I added the missing license parameters to File:Oibird.svg. I did link the source before, there is no specific info for copyright infos. But since it is a logo I added the copyright tags logos usually has on Wikimedia. Hope this would work. Can you please check it? Thanks! LinuxPower (talk) 05:21, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

IP

hi, I would like to inform you about this ip that almost casually continues to submit requests for cancellations, not having the authority to do so as it is an unlogged in IP. I don't know if the subject has an account but he always behaves in this way anonymously without a profile, I find it an unsuitable behavior for the project, could you please point it out to him??? although I have seen that in your talk you have already intervened, and that the subject seems to care highly. 101.101.217.245 14:35, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Famille de Perrier

Bonjour,
Je me permets de signaler l'agitation concernant la famille de Perier, sur laquelle tu étais intervenu il y a près d'un an, notamment avec la création de cette catégorie : Category:Sockpuppets of Savary34.
Le fichier File:Blason de la famille de Perier.svg  fait l'objet d'une décatégorisation par AncestryP (qui a créé Category:Famille de Perier de Salvert) et Comch (tout comme BBC440). A noter, cette intervention douteuse de ‎Cvx14 autour de la même thématique.
Je suppose que la RCU de l'année passée doit être trop ancienne pour des traces. Quelles sont les options possibles, sinon les annulations ?
Bien cdlt B-noa (talk) 12:12, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@B-noa: J'ai bloqué Comch comme marionnette évidente. Pour les autres comptes, il faudrait faire une nouvelle RFCU. J'ai aussi semi-protégé le fichier pour un an. Yann (talk) 19:28, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Bonjour et merci pour ton retour. Je lancerai la RCU dans les prochains jours. --B-noa (talk) 06:06, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nissi Ogulu

Hi Yann,

All my images are always deleted, and I'm getting frustrated already. Please give me a step-by-step guide on how I can upload an image from the public domain.

I uploaded a picture from Flickr and it has a public domain license.

~~~ George Nyiam (talk) 21:49, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:VolenTheSucker

You appear to have recently blocked the above user for abusing multiple accounts. I'm unsure who the master is, but Kristian Dimitrov appears to have re-uploaded one of the same videos that VTS had uploaded; it's available at File:Classic FM TV Promo (2023)-720p-230514.webm. You seem to be more familiar with this case than I am, so I'm dropping you a note here to let you know. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 02:18, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done Blocked, obvious sock. Yann (talk) 07:22, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Have you contacted Flickr high-volume uploaders?

@Yann. I asked a question (and pinged) on June 1st to you from my talk page, but no response yet. Here: User talk:Ooligan#Please give images better names you brought "attention to a common error?" As I said in my reply to you, I have started renaming past files with better names. I have many more to go, but I will try to rename all my uploads in the next two months. There are some Users that have uploaded 100's or 1,000's of files for years with this same "common error" and afterwards, no effort to rename their files.

Have you also contacted other current Flickr uploaders about this "common error?"

What was their response(s)? Thank you, -- Ooligan (talk) 21:55, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Ooligan: No, I didn't systematically contact other Flickr uploaders. Yann (talk) 08:09, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Yann, have you mention to any other editors about this "common error," whether uploaded from Flickr or other sources? I did not mention "systematically." -- Ooligan (talk) 01:01, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Stop uploading out of scope images, or you will be blocked. "

David S. Soriano (talk · contributions · Statistics · Recent activity · block log · User rights log · uploads · Global account information)

This message was placed on David S. Soriano's talk page the 11 June. The user have uploaded several new AI images since then

The fact that he's still uploading his AI art pictures several days later essentially makes your warning pointless, if not useless Trade (talk) 16:13, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done Now blocked. I am in favour of en:Wikipedia:Give 'em enough rope. Yann (talk) 16:28, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

FPC

Why do you want to close my nomination at FPC? And do you have any suggestions of how I can avoid this from happening in future? 20 upper 08:03, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. Read the guidelines. Yann (talk) 08:10, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I read the guidelines and I'm ready to nominate another picture. 20 upper 09:23, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Yann.

I watched that you left me a message in my discussion regarding the image of Blanca Callahan at WinterJam 2015. No problem, I reuploaded that file (because it was already on Wikipedia before) because I didn't know how to add it to the Spanish Wikipedia at the time, but today I understand everything better. You can delete it now or not worry about waiting for a "defense" from me to save the image.

I hope you have a good time on Wikipedia. Pollosito (talk) 18:29, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Pollosito: This file doesn't have a license. Who is the photographer? Yann (talk) 20:27, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The author of this photo is Itsmiabeth, but I just want you to remove it, because it is a duplicate of File:Blanca Winter Jam 2015.png. You look for it and you can verify it. As I told you, at that time I had no experience, so I reuploaded it. Pollosito (talk) 21:57, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done OK, thanks. Yann (talk) 22:22, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

94.245.0.0/16 block

Hi. I narrowed your wide block to 94.245.128.0/18 only (Rostelecom); I think blocking also Swedish/Dutch/Irish IP addresses in the lower part of your blocked range was not justified (WHOIS is your friend). Ankry (talk) 13:15, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The memorial is definitely covered by Indian FoP but is the text on the side de minimis or does it need to be cropped out? Abzeronow (talk) 16:49, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm. Quite border line. Actually, I am on the fence here. Yann (talk) 17:31, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pont de St Georges Nov 2018.jpg

Bonjour Yann,

Si tu as une minute, pourrais-tu s'il-te-plaît regarder l'historique du fichier supprimé File:Pont de St Georges Nov 2018.jpg, supprimé en 2020. Je ne peux pas demander à l'administrateur JuTa qui l'avait supprimé, puisqu'il n'est plus actif. Je ne me souviens pas des détails de ce cas, ni s'il y avait une bonne raison de suppression. C'est pourquoi je préfère vérifier les faits plutôt que de faire une demande de restauration. Le fichier avait été téléversé par l'utilisateur Nesnad le 1er septembre 2019. En tant qu'utilisateur non-administrateur, je dispose seulement de quelques indices qui me permettent de supposer que quelqu'un avait peut-être enlevé la licence vers le 16 mai 2020 et que j'avais peut-être révoqué cette modification le 17 mai 2020 et que finalement le fichier a été supprimé le 31 mai 2020 pour cause «d'absence de licence depuis le 19 mai 2020». Je souhaiterais simplement vérifier 1) si le fichier n'avait effectivement pas de licence et 2) s'agissait-il de ce fichier de flickr : [2] ? Se pourrait-il que le fichier ait été supprimé seulement parce qu'il a une «public domain mark» apposée par l'auteur ? On sait que cela ne se fait plus depuis l'été 2020, peu après la suppression de ce fichier. Accessoirement, les administrateurs disposent-ils d'un outil de recherche qui peut rechercher dans les pages des fichiers supprimés, par exemple pour rechercher si des pages supprimées contenaient l'expression «gvilleneuve28» ou «120224247@N08» pour savoir s'il y a d'autres fichiers supprimés qui provenaient du même compte flickr ? Merci par avance. -- Asclepias (talk) 17:38, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Bon, je l'ai restauré. Il y avait bien une licence. Yann (talk) 17:45, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Super, merci ! -- Asclepias (talk) 17:57, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Q28

Hi, since Q28 has disruptively edited on more than one projects, I'm submitting a request to remove their GIPBE permission on meta. Considering you are the blocking admin, mind you sharing your opinion on that page?
Thank you. Lemonaka (talk) 14:13, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done Yann (talk) 14:29, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unhelpful

Nominations like special:diff/774946847 are truly problematic. It had a source, it was used in a work at English Wikisource, and it was deleted for not having a licence. You could have easily and quickly fixed the file from the enWS work and made it better.  — billinghurst sDrewth 11:01, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Simon Ekpa

One more: File:Simon Ekpa, 2017.png. This one was ok:d by FlickreviewR 2, but per history of this pic on Commons and WP (several uploads by several accounts), I think it's a good bet that the claims on flickr are bullshit, though now somewhat updated bullshit, year was changed compared to earlier. I don't know what the correct Commons procedure is now, and I have no idea how "gullible" flickr is. I could always start an ordinary deletion discussion, but I'd like your input Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 13:58, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done This is an obvious copyvio, so I deleted it, and blocked the uploader for a week. Yann (talk) 15:08, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Much quicker than a deletion discussion. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 15:16, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please, explain

Please expain why you revert the tag for copyright violation https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Ntokoumenta-to-en-ipiro-agrotikon-zitima-1882-i-dimokopia-agonizomeni-na-dimiourgisi-agrotikon-zitima-1882-i-exagora-tou-vourgareliou-32512image2_(4).jpg when it is clear that the book edition 1981, has copyright, who belongs to "Agricultural Bank of Greece" 193.92.155.185 16:58, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Well, it is not an obvious violation, at least. Is it a first edition, or a reprint? And then this page is very simple, it may be {{PD-ineligible}}. Also please create an account and log in. Thanks, Yann (talk) 17:45, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deliberate attack on honest work

Hello,

I am certain it’s a mistake, in no way did I violate any copyrights, my work is based on older files but it included corrections of ahistorical toponymy and minor placement mistakes. I genuinely appreciate your effort, but I truly am trying to do good work, some maps presented are low quality, hastily thrown together with little attention to accuracy in accordance with period maps depicting the area. If there is a better way to do it please do let me know, I’m not so good with technology, my students helped me to edit, I hope it can all better resolved, and that you can help me. Thanks in advance.

Kind regards, Valdazleifr Valdamarrson Valdazleifr (talk) 13:23, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Valdazleifr: You can't upload files made by others, and then claim they are your owns. It is a violation of their copyright. Do not do that again. In addition, there is no point to upload JPEG versions of PNG maps. Yann (talk) 13:51, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Yann, just FYI: Copyright wasn't even the main issue with this user's contributions, rather the fact that he manipulated content while at the same time pretending to be simply improving image quality. His idea of image improvement seems to have been to eliminate Russia off as many historical maps as possible. --217.239.3.91 22:53, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, but I didn't investigate this point. Yann (talk) 07:12, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

2600:387:15:915::2

Could you stop this guy? Trade (talk) 08:13, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

2600:387:15:910:0:0:0:0/60 is blocked by Mdaniels5757. Yann (talk) 21:01, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
A file you uploaded is on the main page!

File:Montecristo 001 dumas.mp3, that you uploaded, is on the main page today. Thank you for your contributions to this project.

//EatchaBot (talk) 00:01, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Immanuelle.png

I thought I filled out all the necessary licensing info on the file. Why was it deleted. Do you still retain the necessary info to reinstate it? Immanuelle ❤️💚💙 (please tag me) 18:45, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Immanuelle: Hi,
Where did you get this file? Do you have any evidence of a free license? Yann (talk) 19:46, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Yann I made the image. I thought I submitted the required information already. Is there a form or something I can fill out? Immanuelle ❤️💚💙 (please tag me) 19:51, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Immanuelle: OK, I restored it. It was taggued as copyvio by IP. Yann (talk) 20:05, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Yann an ip, possibly the same one also apparently got this image File:Immanuelle wave.gif deleted with a rationale of being too ugly for inclusion. I made it too with the same program. Can it be restored too? Immanuelle ❤️💚💙 (please tag me) 20:12, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
OK, done. I also blocked the IP for vandalism, intimidation/harassment. Yann (talk) 20:14, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:LaRappresentante.jpg

why the cancellation? GuardiamarinaVeneziano (talk) 09:24, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@GuardiamarinaVeneziano: This was copied from the Internet, and has a watermark from the copyright holder. Do not copy files from the Internet, or you will be blocked. Yann (talk) 10:23, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Serraul-Italie-1984.png

Bonjour Yann,

Je suis très surpris de cette suppression immédiate que tu as réalisée hier, sans aucun moyen pour moi d'intervenir ou apporter des explications. Le crière retenu serait un problème de droits mais cependant, comme expressément indiqué par les modèles relatifs aux PD-Italie, cette photo ayant été prise en Italie, c'est bien le droit italien qui s'applique. Que ce fichier soit distribué ou diffusé par Getty Image ne change rien. Les mentions ont été respectées. Rappel du principe PD-Italie que j'ai pu faire valider par Racconish : la photo, qu'elle soit recadrée et retouchée ou pas, a été prise en Italie avant 1996. Les pays qui ont ratifié la règle du plus court terme, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rule_of_the_shorter_term sont donc inclus (France comprise, par exemple).

J'ai sollicité Racconish pour qu'il intervienne.

Bonne fin de journée. Tisourcier (talk) 14:20, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Rebonjour Yann,
Après un contrôle précis et surtout l'avis éclairé de plusieurs "experts", je suis OK pour la suppression car effectivement subtilité US, l'année 1989 est justement cette du pivot qui restreint les droits.
Par conséquent, pourrais-tu également supprimer celle que j'avais prévue comme remplacement ?
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Serrault-Italie-1989.jpg
Encore merci et toutes mes excuses pour ma mauvaise compréhension des subtilités du PD-Italy de 1989. ;) Tisourcier (talk) 16:30, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This is apparently an emblem of a state in India's government. There's currently no license on the file, and there was a questionable CC license there before. Is this above the ToO in India? Abzeronow (talk) 17:51, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, yes, the lion of Ashoka emblem is in the public domain. Everything else is PD-ineligible. Yann (talk) 19:48, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, I didn't know the name of the lion emblem but I definitely recognized it. Abzeronow (talk) 16:31, 9 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Translation notification: Commons:Deletion policy

Hello Yann,

You are receiving this notification because you signed up as a translator to French on Wikimedia Commons. The page Commons:Deletion policy is available for translation. You can translate it here:

The priority of this page is high.


This is an important policy page, please assist to translate it into your language.

Your help is greatly appreciated. Translators like you help Wikimedia Commons to function as a truly multilingual community.

You can change your notification preferences.

Thank you!

Wikimedia Commons translation coordinators‎, 14:01, 9 July 2023 (UTC)

Lata Mangeshkar

Bonjour Yann,

Un français (breton?) qui parle hindi? Faudra m'expliquer

I uploaded a Lata Mangeshkar photo, the one used by The Economist for her obituary.

[3]https://www.economist.com/obituary/lata-mangeshkar-was-the-soundtrack-of-the-newly-independent-country/21807600]

Nearly a year ago, you asked me to justify having the rights to use it. I'm not too well versed with all this so kinda abandoned the initiative.

Can you help me out? It's from a 1942 film (Pahili Mangalagaur) and I'm sure it is in the public domain

Had I seen your name back then, I would have contacted you much sooner. Je ne connais pas beaucoup, à vrai dire, aucun français qui parle hindi

Cordialement, d'Evry, Essonne. Varoon2542 (talk) 21:53, 9 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Et oui. Mais bon, je n'ai de breton que le nom. ;o) J'ai ajouté un commentaire. Yann (talk) 08:33, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Middleton family

Hi, I'm using my phone which is difficult, so sorry. Here is the file: File:J.A._Middleton_at_Winchester_1914.jpg

I have done my best as the uploader. Please have a look and sort out if you can Thanks again 175.38.42.62 09:53, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

OK, fixed. Yann (talk) 14:59, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Zaxxon0 (talk) 08:17, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please unblock me

Please unblock me, I will not share my photos again; it is okay. 197.38.165.131 19:40, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please make a request when you are logged in, using the format {{unblock|your reason here}} on your talk page. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 20:49, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No picture of Md Salim

Md Salim being a prominent politician of Bengal but there are no picture of him Indian Marxist Politician (talk) 11:22, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Indian Marxist Politician: May be, but do not upload pictures not taken by you. Yann (talk) 11:24, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
where i will get the noble peoples to take picture. Moreover, it's a portrait and not a pictures. Indian Marxist Politician (talk) 13:25, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Who has uploaded this picture File:Adhir_Ranjan_Chowdhury_official_portrait.jpg. Is this picture taken the person's camera who has uploaded it. Indian Marxist Politician (talk) 13:41, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
You upload this pictures Indian Marxist Politician (talk) 13:25, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Indian Marxist Politician: This was copied from the Indian government website, and is under the Government Open Data License - India (GODL). BTW this license is very much untested, and may not be valid. You should read carefully what is written on the file page, and on your talk page. Yann (talk) 17:44, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I have also collected this pictures from this website Indian Marxist Politician (talk) 23:24, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The source you gave is different. Yann (talk) 11:29, 14 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Trojansky

Hi, Yann! In relation to this, there's also this one and this. I've started this investigation into these accounts/this user, in case that's of interest here. Regards, Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 09:20, 14 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Justlettersandnumbers: Files deleted, accounts blocked. Commons:Requests for checkuser/Case/Hankdong123 was opened by User:Dreamy Jazz. Thanks for the notification. Yann (talk) 11:40, 14 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Undeletion edit summaries etc

I noticed that File:HMS Llandaff, 1969 (IWM).jpg has been undeleted, presumably because Crown Copyright has now expired, which is great, and I have no problem with the undeletion of the photo, but I noticed that when you removed the deletion discussion tag from the (undeleted?) file, that you used the edit summary "(Kept per Commons:Deletion requests/File:HMS Llandaff, 1969 (IWM).jpg)" which is misleading because it points to a discussion where the conclusion was to delete, and there isn't any explanation of why it was undeleted. Would it be possible to be a bit clearer in the edit summary or somewhere in the page history on on the talk page about the reasons for undeletion? Nigel Ish (talk) 09:37, 14 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There is also a talk page not saying the file was kept pointing to a discussion that says delete. Nigel Ish (talk) 09:39, 14 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I edited the talk page. Yann (talk) 11:36, 14 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Undeletion discussion was here: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Undeletion_requests/Archive/2023-01#File:HMS_Eastbourne,_1972_(IWM).jpg It was added to discussion because I found it while looking through other files that had its copyright expired. Abzeronow (talk) 16:12, 14 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Commons photographers: next virtual meeting on August 5

Dear member of the Commons Photographers User Group,

I'm inviting you to our next virtual meeting on Saturday, August 5th. We'll have two speakers: Poco a poco will provide us with an update on his underwater photography and George Oates from the Flickr Foundation will talk about the Flickr-to-Commons bridge (“Flickypedia”) that is currently in the works. If you're interested in attending, please sign up on this page: Virtual Meeting on August 5, 2023.

I hope you're having a great time taking photos and I'm looking forward to seeing you on August 5th.

All the best, --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 15:41, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A file you uploaded is on the main page!

File:"Elle n'est pas morte" - E. Pottier - O.P.A chante La Commune de Paris.webm, that you uploaded, is on the main page today. Thank you for your contributions to this project.

//EatchaBot (talk) 00:04, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Closure

Hello @Yann, I hope you're doing well. Can you close the DR. Thanks for your consideration. C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 13:32, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

License tag

Hi, I was wondering if it's okay if I replace the current license tag in this image with {{PD-Australia}}?Syrus257 (talk) 11:09, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Syrus257: Hi,
Do not replace the current tag. Just add {{PD-Australia}} below. Yann (talk) 11:46, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
So sorry for bothering you again. But this image is also published by the State Library of Queensland. It has only {{PD-Australia}} instead of {{No known copyright restrictions}}. So why can't we replace the tag with {{PD-Australia}} in the image that I've mentioned before? I'm new here and trying to figure out things. Thank you for your time. Syrus257 (talk) 16:06, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Syrus257: Because they were copied from different sources. {{No known copyright restrictions}} is the license it has on Flickr, so it is best to keep it. Yann (talk) 16:15, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
A file you uploaded is on the main page!

File:Tolstoifortheyoung 01 tolstoy 128kb.mp3, that you uploaded, is on the main page today. Thank you for your contributions to this project.

//EatchaBot (talk) 00:01, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please revdel two more comments. Thanks. Glrx (talk) 04:29, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Upload image

Hello, could you please upload this Flickr image. You can call it "Klompen (Dutch Clogs), Wooden Shoes Museum in Drenthe". -Artanisen (talk) 09:16, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Artanisen: Why can't you do it yourself? Yann (talk) 17:39, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
When I download it the image colors are a bit distorted so maybe you could try it if you want. -Artanisen (talk) 11:18, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Mistake?

Hi @Yann: . I hope you are doing good. I am reaching you out here to notify that one of your review here:File:Mithila-Palkar-2020.jpg might have been accepted mistakenly by you as the file is a wallpaper and does not fall under the Bollywood Hungama licence. I have placed speedy deletion template on the file and added the source destination in my deletion summary. This is only to notify you since you were the administrator and nothing else. Please correct me if I am at fault. Thank you. (Ping me in-case you reply) 456legend (talk) 12:20, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It is already deleted. Yann (talk) 16:18, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Possible problematic uploads

Hi, I noticed that @Maxscheller uploaded many files as "own work", but then credits somebody else as author (e.g. File:Phytoecia (Parobereina) heinzi Lazarev, 2019.jpg). Perhaps you can have a look at it or (I'm less familiar with Commons) point me to where I should take this concern. Thanks! Randykitty (talk) 15:44, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see any issue. His is the person credited. Yann (talk) 17:01, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
?? As "source" he gives own work and as "author" he lists Maxim Alexandrovich Lazarev (but his userid says he's "Maxscheller"). There's no evidence that Maxschller is Maxim Alexandrovich Lazarev. I'm sorry, but I don't get it. What am I missing? Sorry for being insistent, but I'd like to understand... --Randykitty (talk) 22:00, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
User:Maxscheller redirects to Category:Maxim Alexandrovich Lazarev. This is obviously the same person. Yann (talk) 23:10, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Yann,
Maxim Alexandrovich Lazarev = Maxscheller, I am in all wiki projects under the same nickname. Maxscheller (talk) 06:26, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
All clear, apologies for not checking the userpage myself... Thanks! --Randykitty (talk) 08:05, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Recent speedy deletion

Hi! I'm looking at this speedy deletion, but it had been kept on copyright grounds at DR (see: Commons:Deletion requests/File:With Beautiful Actress Simran.jpg). The rationale for the speedy ("no metadata") doesn't seem to be a speedy reason for deletion; that's a reason to have a discussion, but there isn't clear copyvio here. Are you willing to undelete File:With Beautiful Actress Simran.jpg pending further discussion? — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 15:30, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done Restored. It was tagged as copyvio by a new user, and I didn't check. Yann (talk) 20:02, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Recent speedy deletion 2

Hi Yann! I'm looking for the reason of this speedy deletion Can it be undone or can you upload a new file instead (if possible)? — AKSHADĒV™ 💬 09:43, 29 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Akshadev: This is a copyright violation. We need a permission from the copyright holder for a free license. Yann (talk) 10:33, 29 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:To The Beauty Within

This user is uploading images from Facebook and other websites which is against Wikipedia copyright policy and using in English Wikipedia articles. Please remove them. They are as follows

45.64.17.3 12:37, 29 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The user has again uploaded image from Facebook. See File:Soumitrisha.jpg 45.64.17.3 14:58, 29 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Brouillon

Bonjour,

J'aurais besoin de faire des essais sur une image (image quelconque, ce n'est pas le sujet de l'image qui serait objet de l'essai, un rectangle blanc ou vert suffirait), sais-tu s'il est possible d'avoir une image comme sous-page utilisateur ? Si oui, comment créer cette sous-page utilisateur, je dois télécharger mon image quelconque puis demander son renommage comme sous-page ? O.Taris (talk) 08:24, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@O.Taris: Non, une image ne peut pas être une sous-page. Tu peux créer une page de test en sous-page comme ceci : User:O.Taris/test. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 11:44, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
OK, merci, je vais me débrouiller au mieux. O.Taris (talk) 19:38, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Auguste Cartault

This Wikimedia Commons item [[4]] has the name Augustin, but on French Wikipedia he is Auguste. Is there an error? Kanjuzi (talk) 17:59, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Kanjuzi: Hmm. Son acte de décès donne Augustin. Il faudrait vérifier l'acte de naissance. Augustin est peut-être un diminutif.
His death certificate gives Augustin. His birth certificate should be checked. Augustin may be a nickname. Yann (talk) 18:10, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oui, je pense que vous avez raison. Tous ses livres vendus par Amazon n'ont que le nom Augustin. J'écrirai Augustin dans mon article sur Sulpicia. Kanjuzi (talk) 06:36, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

(Three) undeleted files

Hey, I saw you have undeleted 16 files. You asked me to add {{Information}} to them, and I have done so to 13 of them.

There are, nevertheless, three files whose exact source I cannot find, probably because they are the ones not loading here and here. Should we assume good-faith from the uploader or mark them as No source? (They were uploaded almost 18 years ago!)

Regards, RodRabelo7 (talk) 23:22, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@RodRabelo7: Hi, I don't think there isn't any worry about the license.
Did you try searching the image with Google/TinEye? Did you try the Internet Archive? Yann (talk) 07:41, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Mazum24

Back again, this time with Cutlerys (talk contribs Luxo's SUL deleted contribs logs block user block log ) CutlassCiera 01:12, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done Blocked. Yann (talk) 07:49, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Question about your proposal

Hi. Do you happen to know what the status of your Proposal to allow old orphan works is? I was thinking about requesting it be closed since I have old photographs I'd like to upload and there seems to be a consensus to approve it. Plus it's been open for quit awhile without further comments. I don't want to do either one if I'm just reading it wrong and it really failed or something though. Thanks. Adamant1 (talk) 11:08, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Adamant1: I was looking for someone else to close it, but since nobody cares I will close it myself. Now we need a template reflecting the decision. Can you help with that? Yann (talk) 16:42, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Awesome. Unfortunately I have no idea how templates work. So I can't really help you there. Sorry. --Adamant1 (talk) 19:31, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Vesouleries

Bonjour, Merci de créer une ou plusieurs demandes de suppression, en informant l'utilisateur. De nos jours, tout le monde peut prendre des photos avec un drone. Donc "photo aérienne" n'est pas une justification suffisante pour une suppression immédiate. Yann (talk) 16:40, 29 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@ Yann vraiment incroyable de lire un tel commentaire ! Je n'ai JAMAIS utilisé l'unique argument qu'il s'agit d'une "vue aérienne" puisque vous semblez ne pas comprendre l'anglais, je vais donc traduire :
  • "unsimilar to the other pitctures of this user take in the ground" [FR : différent des autres images prisent au sol par l'utilisateur en question] (sous entendu les images prises au sol dont de qualité correcte et en haute définition alors que les images aériennes sont de très faible définition et souvent pixélisées).
  • "poor quality from Google image" [FR : qualité médiocre issu de Google image] (rejoint l'argument ci-dessus)
  • "printed image take by smartphone (see the color point composed the picture)" [FR : image imprimée prise avec smartphone (regardez les points de couleur qui composent l'image)] on a en plus des exif des photo de smartphone, vous avez déjà vu un téléphone voler ? Et ne me sortez pas l'augment de l'aéronef, il s'agit de photo ultra zoomées et prise parfaitement à la verticale, de plus on voit clairement qu'il s'agit d'une photo imprimé avec les point d'impression.
  • "ILEGAL to broadcast aerial footage of an activ jail !" (FR : il est illégale de diffusé une vue aérienne d'une prison active ! Et oui, Google maps et le Géoportail n'on pas le droit de diffuser de vue aérienne des prisons mais visiblement vous êtes ok pour diffuser cela sur Commons et Wikipédia, aucun problème !
Ces photos n'ont aucun liens esthétiques et techniques entres elles. C'est symptomatique du copyvio, on vole des images fantômes de base qualité sur Google image et on reprend avec son téléphone des vues aériennes anciennes affichées en mairie où dans un quelconque lieu publique, vous n'avez aucune perspicacité pour détecter ça ?
Enfin et pour couronner le tout, toutes ces images sont en lien avec Vesoul et ont été mises en ligne par de multiples compte éphémères ! Et pourquoi ? Parce qu'ils ont tous été bloqués sur Wikipédia. Tous ces comptes sont les faux-nez d'un même individu qui a été banni pour ses nombreux copyvio, des copier-coller textuels d'internet sont modifier une seule virgule ! Et AUSSI des photos !
VOIR : fr:Wikipédia:Faux-nez/PiedgauchedeZidane
ET fr:Wikipédia:Bulletin_des_administrateurs/2013/Semaine_7#Vesouleries
Mais bon puisque l'on ne peut pas travailler ici, je fait en discuter avec les administrateurs de Wikipédia qui connaissent l'affaire et prennent les choses au sérieux. Nous pourrons peut-êtres trouver les solutions adaptées à cette problématique là-bas. Merci pour la perte de temps et le soutiens aux délinquants en tout cas !

A.BourgeoisP (talk) 11:28, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Il faudrait descendre de votre cheval, et vous calmer. Yann (talk) 11:40, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of: Closing discussions without all users participated

Yann, while I certainly appreciate the spirit in which you deleted this silly comment -- how can "all Wikimedia users participate[d]", when I see a change to my talk page, I just pull up the history to see what the change was, which takes longer than simply reading the post and deleting it myself. Regards, .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:16, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

OK, sorry. Since I blocked this IP for vandalism elsewhere, I thought it better to also revert the post on your talk page. Yann (talk) 14:15, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Something I meant to ask you earlier...

Why exactly is it disruptive to "solicit proxy edits on one's behalf on [another project which I won't name] through Commons" (as Surjection wrote here)? See, the proxy-edit-soliciting was done simply so that I would feel less of an urge to block-evade.
So why would he (Surjection) find that part disruptive, especially when I never asked him to make those proxy edits? I'd ask Surjection but he and Fish bowl seem to think everything I ask them is "pestering", even when I don't mean it that way. Shāntián Tàiláng (talk) 20:18, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quick reminder: Commons Photographers meeting this Saturday

Dear member of the Commons Photographers User Group,

This is a quick reminder that our next meeting will happen on Saturday, August 5th. If you haven't registered yet and you're interested in learning more about underwater photography and “Flickypedia”, please sign up on this page. Also, I invite you to fill out this survey created by the people who are working on the Flickr-to-Wikimedia Commons software. Your input will make a difference.

We haven't had a virtual meeting in a while and I'm so looking forward to this weekend!

All the best, --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 02:15, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A file you uploaded is on the main page!

File:Whatmenliveby 01 tolstoy.mp3, that you uploaded, is on the main page today. Thank you for your contributions to this project.

//EatchaBot (talk) 00:02, 5 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, Yann! Just wanted to let you know I fixed a few more bits of damage on this. Better to say than to keep silent, aye? Adam Cuerden (talk) 11:32, 5 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A file you uploaded is on the main page!

File:300 ans des Lettres Persanes - La tolérance face aux mouvements woke et à la cancel culture.webm, that you uploaded, is on the main page today. Thank you for your contributions to this project.

//EatchaBot (talk) 00:01, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A file you uploaded is on the main page!

File:Hogwarts Legacy – Official 4K Reveal Trailer.webm, that you uploaded, is on the main page today. Thank you for your contributions to this project.

//EatchaBot (talk) 00:01, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 You are invited to join the discussion at COM:VPC#PD-US-1978-89 for murals?. -- Marchjuly (talk) 12:24, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Yann. I'm wondering if you'd mind taking a look at this because you actually reviewed the Flickr license for File:Trains mural.jpg and marked it as "OK". I don't dispute that; I'm just not sure if the Flickr license also covers the mural shown in the photo. -- Marchjuly (talk) 12:27, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Import d'une photo de statue

Bonjour, comme vous êtes le seul administrateur francophone dont je me souviens sur Commons, je m'adresse à vous. Tout à l'heure j'aurais souhaité importer la photo d'une statue de François Rabelais, apparemment créée par Henri Dumaigne en 1880, et qui se trouve sur la voie publique. Mais je me suis souvenue aussi qu'il n'y avait pas de liberté de panorama en France, et je ne connais pas bien la législation sur ces questions. Aurais-je le droit d'importer la photo ? J'ai aussi importé une photo sur laquelle on voit des bâtiments, est-ce autorisé ? (Je suppose que peut-être seuls les bâtiments architecturaux se démarquant par l'empreinte de leur auteur sont soumis à une interdiction de reproduction...) Dans l'attente de votre réponse, cordialement. Olga Rithme (talk) 15:37, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Olga Rithme: Bonjour,
Comme Henri Dumaigne est mort en 1888, il n'y aucun souci pour importer des images de ses oeuvres sur Commons. Pas de problème non plus pour la photo mentionnée ci-dessus. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 15:45, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
D'accord, c'est ce que j'avais envisagé mais je préférais demander n'étant pas bien sûre... Merci et bonne fin de semaine. Olga Rithme (talk) 15:48, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted photo of Jennie Kim at Met Gala

Hello! I don't understand why you deleted about 10 minutes after someone nominated to for speedy deletion. I wanted to make an appeal for that. Kalisidina (talk) 15:49, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Kalisidina: This is an obvious copyright violation, so it meets the criteria for speedy deletion. Everything on the Internet is under a copyright unless there is a mention of a free license. Please read COM:L. Yann (talk) 15:52, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I relied on photos like this File:Jennie Kim for Marie Claire Korea Magazine on October 9, 2018 (5).png. It is the same but they were still approved. Kalisidina (talk) 15:55, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Kalisidina: This one has a free license at the source. Yann (talk) 16:00, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I also made a screenshot btw. Kalisidina (talk) 16:04, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Kalisidina: It doesn't matter. Your file is a derivative work. Yann (talk) 16:07, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Yann But that file is not a derivative work because it was made in movement? I have read what you sent and still didn't understand logic. Kalisidina (talk) 16:11, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Kalisidina: Yes, your file is a derivative work of the video. Since you are not the author of the video, and it is not under a free license, you are not allowed to upload a screenshot of this video to Commons. Yann (talk) 22:55, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour,
Dans l'en-tête de cette catégorie, un texte encadré rappelle qu'il s'agit d'une catégorie-mère et que les images doivent de préférence être placées dans une sous-catégorie la plus appropriée possible. J'ai entrepris depuis plusieurs semaines de faire ce travail de recatégorisation. Après ce nettoyage, je me demande comment faire pour enlever, après la liste des sous-catégories, dans une section intitulée Pages dans la catégorie « Rail vehicles », le modèle « Template:Rolling Stock-Information ». Je ne comprends pas à quoi sert ce modèle à cet emplacement ; en effet, quand un utilisateur veut déposer un fichier, je ne pense pas qu'il va consulter cette catégorie pour remplir les différents champs du formulaire d'import mais qu'il va aller sur « Importer un fichier ». J'ai essayé de supprimer la category Rail vehicles du modèle en question mais je n'y suis pas parvenu. Quel est ton avis ? Cordialement. Geralix (talk) 13:37, 13 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Geralix: C'était . Elle apparait toujours, mais je pense que c'est un problème de cache. Yann (talk) 14:45, 13 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Yann: Merci beaucoup. J'ai essayé de purger le cache de la page “Category:Rail vehicles” en ajoutant “?action=purge” à la fin de l'URL dans la barre d'adresse de mon navigateur mais ça n'a rien donné. On verra dans quelques jours. Geralix (talk) 15:43, 13 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Yann: Ma manipulation a été utile. Je viens de consulter à nouveau la page “Category:Rail vehicles”. J'ai constaté que la section intitulée Pages dans la catégorie « Rail vehicles » et le modèle « Template:Rolling Stock-Information » ont disparu. Affaire terminée. Geralix (talk) 16:10, 13 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Template:PD-Coa-Germany

Hi @Yann

I have a request regarding license templates for German public organizations. There is already the "PD-Coa-Germany". It refers to the "Corporation of public law" (German: "Körperschaft des öffentlichen Rechts") - For example: "Deutschlandradio", "Medizinischer Dienst der Krankenversicherung" or "Industrie- und Handelskammer".

But there is another very similar form of public organization in Germany: The "Institution of public law" (German: "Anstalt des öffentlichen Rechts") - For example: "Versorgungsanstalt des Bundes und der Länder", "Technisches Hilfswerk" or "Deutsche Nationalbibliothek".

The only differences are, that the Corporation of public law has members and the Institution of public law has users. Legally, both are basically very similar because both serve a public purpose. I could therefore imagine that it would make sense if there were also a related template for the Institutions of public law (German: Anstalt des öffentlichen Rechts) What do you think? Bildersindtoll (talk) 14:30, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Bildersindtoll: I don't know the specific details of German copyright law. You should ask someone who knows better and speaks German, or on the dedicated copyright board. Yann (talk) 15:13, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I will do that, thank you! Bildersindtoll (talk) 15:15, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Translation/Internationalisation request.

I recently wrote Template:Addbookdata as i found I was going to be leaving the same message on a lot of pages. Any chance you could make it a template that translate into an uploaders desired interface language (Ideally something that subst:'s)? ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 13:49, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

August 2023

Hello, Yann. You have new messages at Bilksneath's talk page.
You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  বাংলা  català  čeština  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  English  español  suomi  français  galego  हिन्दी  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  ქართული  македонски  മലയാളം  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenščina  svenska  Tagalog  Türkçe  简体中文  繁體中文  +/−

Red-tailed hawk (nest) 17:29, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Request

Hello @Yann, I have posted a request for History merge and redirect. Could you spare a moment to look into it. Thanks for your consideration. C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 09:23, 20 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done Yann (talk) 09:37, 20 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Yann Thanks for the quick response C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 09:49, 20 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Year categories for stamps of Algeria

You mind if I nominate the ones you recreated yesterday for deletion since they are empty? It doesn't look like there's any Algerian stamps from those years to begin with anyway. At least not from what I can find. Thanks. Adamant1 (talk) 06:33, 21 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Adamant1: Could you wait until there is a clear decision please? After independence stamps are OK, so there is no problem having categories for them. Some pre-independence stamps are certainly also OK, while some are not. I would keep the categories anyway. Yann (talk) 11:22, 21 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
That's fine. I'll probably move them to categories specifically for postage stamps once it's figured out, but I'll at least leave them alone until then. --Adamant1 (talk) 11:30, 21 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Just FYI

Hello Yann,

thank you very much for your great work on Wikimedia Commons! Just a little tip apropos of your nomination of File:Joseph Siffrein Duplessis - Benjamin Franklin - Google Art Project.jpg: When a picture is already a Featured Picture on some Wikipedia edition (and therefore already includes the {{Assessments}} template), and then becomes a FP on Commons, too, our FPCBot always forgets to add the necessary featured=1 parameter to the {{Assessments}} template, we must do that manually. I have resolved it ([5]), but I may not find all cases of this problem. Therefore I wanted you to know about the problem – maybe you want to check your own next FP nominations for this problem after the FP promotion.

Thank you again and all the best, --Aristeas (talk) 09:55, 21 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I always forget about this issue. Yann (talk) 11:24, 21 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Yann, pourrais-tu expurger ce fichier djvu de l'article de Lalande, "Les récents dictionnaires de philosophie", p. 628 à 648 ? D'avance merci ! Cordialement, — Racconish💬 10:31, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done Yann (talk) 12:17, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User talk protection

Hello. I'm just curious, why should a banned user get deletion request notifications? Jonteemil (talk) 17:43, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

They don't. But this allows others to check deletion requests of their files. If the talk page is protected, creating a DR by a non-admin will probably ends in an error. I didn't test that though. Yann (talk) 17:47, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hmm, I have trouble understanding. Are you saying that it needs to stay unprotected because otherwise files uploaded by the user couldn't be DR'ed (by non-admins). Jonteemil (talk) 18:03, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
At least, that's why Russavia's talk page is not protected. I am not really sure it is needed, so I am going to test it. Yann (talk) 18:22, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
OK, it is not really needed. The DR is created and added to the log, even when it produces an error message. Yann (talk) 18:30, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, so can you protect the user talk page? Jonteemil (talk) 03:10, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done Yann (talk) 12:29, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If @Jfruh: and I both request it, will you unprotect the map? From past experience, trying to get admins to update a map that changes on a weekly timescale is a fruitless task. Usually what happens is people end up creating a duplicate map and start using that, which just multiplies the number of useless files on Commons.

In this case, Jfruh reverted it with a valid reference, which I accepted, but then re-reverted when I found a more up-to-date reference. The map should reflect the current situation, so I think we'd both agree that whichever version is supported by the most recent news reports is the one we should use. Kwamikagami (talk) 22:37, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reverted deletion request

Please explain. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 14:42, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If anything should be deleted, it is File:Photos-Celebs-attend-the-GQ35-Most-Influential-Young-Indians-909-2 (cropped).jpg. The source was just undeleted. The license is OK, I reviewed it. Yann (talk) 18:02, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
How did you "review" it? Per Commons:Village pump/Copyright/Archive/2020/12#Template:BollywoodHungama, the problem isn't that the files are shown as licensed on the source site, but that the source site is untrustworthy for making such claims. This makes it near-impossible to "review" them past this.
Also an unexplained rollback like this is inexcusable, yet also unsurprising from you. Andy Dingley (talk) 21:44, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Eh, I'm not offended. It's not a good practice to use the rollback tool for non-obvious reversions, if that's what Yann did, but he might have just forgotten to post to my user talk page. We can't expect perfection from admins, only good faith. I speak as a Wikivoyage admin. I'm not perfect. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:25, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Ikan Kekek: Do you still want to delete one of these files? Yann (talk) 12:23, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Not if there's no licensing problem. I made the deletion request only because when a file is deleted for copyright violation and reinstated, it seems like an obvious one to delete. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:27, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Question about a revert

https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons_talk:Licensing&diff=prev&oldid=796508815: seemed like it was probably a legitimate question, even if posted in the wrong place. I couldn't quite work it out with Google Translate, but it seemed like he was asking about how to remove some image from somewhere (or to delete the image outright, couldn't tell which). - Jmabel ! talk 20:51, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I posted a message of their talk page. Thanks for your message. Yann (talk) 12:25, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of images affecting my account

As of recent many of photographs I’ve uploaded to the site on here have been prompted for deletion due to “copyright” issues, my question is. I provided proper sources and even links to many of the photos, what makes them copyright infringement? It is very frustrating as I’ve been a massive contributor to many Wikipedia pages improving them not only information but photos, and to have a situation like this happen is very disheartening. As a lot of the photographs which have already been deleted took time to upload to the site, and for me to be able to look proper sources. What can I even do at this point just let it happen? Because it is very disappointing for my page to be swarmed with violations for no apparent reason to my knowledge, unless it had something to do specifics with how I categorized the copyright. So please let me know if I can do something at this point as you’re the person who decided to start mass deletion on many of my photos and to almost get my account removed. Plazawinehouse1970 (talk) 02:08, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Plazawinehouse1970: Yes, the files you uploaded are copyright violations. You are not allowed to upload files copied from the Internet, unless they are under a free license or in the public domain. Yann (talk) 09:40, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Chhanchhana zote hmar picture

I don't know if this user can be blocked just by the duck test but it's obviously a sockpuppet. Anyway, I've created Commons:Requests for checkuser/Case/Chhanchhana zote hmar. Jonteemil (talk) 14:20, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion request

Hi, you have deleted the files in Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by inappropriate username; the same person has updated another file with a similar (inappropriate) username, cf. Commons:Deletion requests/File:Mercedes Benz Citaro C2 Wiener Linien 2023.jpg. Could you have a look on that? The file is used in Wikipedia since ip-users (apparently the same person) made them be there by edit wars. Thanks, Taste1at (talk) 08:37, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It's Wiki Loves Monuments time again!

Hello Yann/archives 54!

We are excited again to let you know that, Wiki Loves Monuments, the largest photography competition of the world, will take place for the 14th time this year. And guess what! India is going to participate in the event again this year from September 1 to September 30, 2023. You might remember this competition as you had participated in one of its previous editions. We would be very delighted to see you take part in the competition again, help record and digitally document our monuments for future generations and get a chance to win exciting prizes!!!

You can find more details about the Indian edition of the competition in this event page. See you in action soon!!

Regards,
Bodhisattwa
(on behalf of the Wiki Loves Monuments 2023 in India team)
Sent through MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:20, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Daily Express

Hello! I'm the author of this upload. Can you, please, review it and keep it, since I has updated the license?

Yeeeep nooope (talk) 08:47, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Question procédurale

Bonjour Yann, Les pages concernées par [6] et [7] sont actuellement de simples redirections après suppression des fichiers. Je suppose que ce que le proposeur demande est la restauration des fichiers eux-mêmes. Je n'ai pas d'opinion sur l'affaire, je signale seulement la chose. -- Asclepias (talk) 13:29, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done I undeleted the first one, but the second is indeed a duplicate. Thanks for your message. Yann (talk) 14:10, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]