User talk:Yann/archives 49
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Comment envoyer une permission quand on a pas internet ?
C'est la question que Lucyin me pose.
Bonjour Yann,
Lucyin me fait savoir que la nièce de Gaston Lucy, seule héritière, est disposée à libérer les œuvres de son oncle. Le petit problème, c' est qu'il s'agit d'une femme de 90 ans qui n'y comprend rien à l'informatique et qui n'a pas Internet. C'est compréhensible ! Lucyin aimerait savoir s'il peut envoyer lui-même l’email à la fondation, avec en pièce jointe une lettre scannée contenant l'autorisation, datée, signée et contenant les coordonnées de cette dame, en expliquant pourquoi c'est lui qui envoie l'email et non elle. Y a-t-il des chances que ça aboutissent, d'après toi ? Y a-t-il une méthode alternative ? Reptilien.19831209BE1 (talk) 22:18, 21 November 2021 (UTC)
- @Reptilien.19831209BE1: Oui, elle peut rédiger une lettre manuscrite, que Lucyin peut scanner, et envoyer en pièce jointe. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 22:21, 21 November 2021 (UTC)
- Impeccable, je fais passer le message. Un grand merci pour ton aide. Amicalement, Reptilien.19831209BE1 (talk) 06:34, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Wikipedia in Esperanto
Dear colleague! I am an administrator of Wikipedia in Esperanto. I reviewed few your edits in it (they are file renames, I know) and I want to give to you an autoreview status. Do you agree? Gamliel Fishkin 07:13, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
- @Gamliel Fishkin: Yes, fine. Thank you. In fact, these edits were made by a bot on my behalf because I renamed some files here on Commons. Regards, Yann (talk)
Thanks for your suggest, I did it, see now if wrong I revert it, regards!!! Ezarateesteban 19:49, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
- And? Any other suggest? Ezarateesteban 17:37, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
- Yes, much better. Make it perfectly square. However, I don't know if that is sufficient to make it FP. Regards, Yann (talk) 19:16, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
- And? Any other suggest? Ezarateesteban 17:37, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
Claire Monis
Bonjour Yann, j'ai remis la photo de Claire Monis à la demande de la famille sur la page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Claire_Monis Pouvez vous svp me dire quel est le soucis ? Il s'agit d'une photo d'identité prise dans l'album familial Cordialement David David Choukroun (talk) 23:30, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
- @David Choukroun: You didn't provide a license, and there is no evidence of a free license, or that it is in the public domain. We need the date of the first publication, possibly the author, and a proper source. Maybe it could be kept on the English Wikipedia under a fair use rationale, but you need to write it down on the file page. Thanks, Yann (talk) 08:57, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
Crop from a deleted file
Hi Yann. Since you've deleted File:Actor Anita Stewart on a 10-inch Ceramic Souvenir Plate. Vitagraph Studios publicity item.jpg, I'm wondering what you think about File:Actor Anita Stewart on a 10-inch Ceramic Souvenir Plate. Vitagraph Studios publicity item (cropped).png. It's a crop taken from the deleted file and there appears to be some disagreement as to whether it can be kept. (see User talk:Explicit#Question about original and cropped versions of same image and User talk:Clindberg#File:Actor Anita Stewart on a 10-inch Ceramic Souvenir Plate. Vitagraph Studios publicity item.jpg for reference. Please note the two editors I asked about this are quite experienced when it comes to image licensing matters, but they just happen to disagree about this particular file. If the file can be kept, then great; if not, then it's not something I'm going to lose any sleep over. It was just one of many files uploaded by the same person with sketchy licensing and that I thought that perhaps this one might possibly be able to be kept if cropped. -- Marchjuly (talk) 12:49, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
- @Marchjuly: Hi, yes, I saw these discussion. I think that the cropped version is fine with a PD-Art template. Regards, Yann (talk) 14:54, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
- Thank you for taking a look at this. -- Marchjuly (talk) 21:31, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
Delete
I want to delete my 3 photos: File:Acid Iodous.png, File:Chloramine B tank.jpg and File:Capsule 616x353.jpg. Thanks. Buồn ngủ quá⁂ 5 phút nữa ⁂ 11:42, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
Message from CoolChib
Why you delete my image- CoolChib124 (talk) 17:09, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
- @CoolChib124: Because they are copyright violations. You don't have the permission of the copyright holder to upload these files here. Please read COM:L before uploading anything else. Thanks, Yann (talk) 17:20, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
Question for you
You blocked me for three days for one (1) revert. Yet other editors actually edit war and you do nothing. [1] [2]
I do not understand. Why are you against me? Krok6kola (talk) 00:43, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
- These 2 will certainly be blocked for a long time soon. Yann (talk) 13:46, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
- One (GPinkerton) was blocked for one (1) day by A.Savin [3] for more than 20 reverts, the block was appealed and the appeal declined by Elcobbola.[4] When the block expired, the editor deleted the evidence of the block[5]. (I notice that two days later you blocked that editor for one month). The other editor, Orijentolog, an editor with whom I have had a good relationship, went to A.Savin's talk page to discuss categories and A.Savin (who cannot block me himself as an involved editor who has a history with me) said he had been monitoring me [6]. He is looked for an excuse to get another admin to block me, as he had done previously. [7] That block, based on two edits provided by A.Savin, I appealed and was unblocked per a discussion on the Admin/User problems talk page. I want you to be aware of this history. I am not a perfect editor but I take the Commons seriously and do my best. It seems Admins on the Commons tend to stand behind each other without questioning. So I cannot exist here without constant worry even though I am doing nothing wrong (except the recent minor edit war with A.Savin) over a silly category (people bathing in regular clothes) placed on a Featured Picture that the photographer had asked A.Savin to remove from his photo of a religious man. Do you have any advice for me? Best wishes, Krok6kola (talk) 23:57, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
- It's curious to see my name proceeded by "It seems Admins on the Commons tend to stand behind each other without questioning", Krok6kola. I visited Category:Requests_for_unblock, as I regularly do, and found a request by GPinkerton, who had been blocked for edit-warring. I looked to see whether this was so. I found and summarized this. Do you believe this was "without questioning"? Do you believe GPinkerton was not edit warring? Do you believe their request acknowledged the issue and offered a credible commitment to discontinue, our requirements? Do you believe your veiled accusation of collusion/cronyism is in-line with COM:AGF? Эlcobbola talk 17:54, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
- @Elcobbola: I am wishing for some other explanation as I want to feel good about the Commons and try to right to the best of my ability. As explained above, I was referring to your review and upholding of my three-day-block by Yann for my total of two reverts of A.Savin. Yann blocked me immediately after his warning to me (although I had replied I would not do it again but was blocked anyway). A.Savin has a history of trying to get me blocked. He cannot do it himself as he has a history of harassing me.[8] so I can only speculate as to why Yann thought my behavior deserved this treatment. Shortly thereafter A.Savin blocked GPinkerton for one day for making over 20 reverts. Two days later Yann blocked GPinkerton for a month. Your review of this block was correct in my opinion. I have a very high opinion of Yann or I would not have risked posting here. Is there not a discrepancy here? I am looking for an understanding. Krok6kola (talk) 19:22, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
- You've not answered any of my questions. Эlcobbola talk 19:27, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
- Maybe I do not understand your questions. I do believe GPinkerton was edit warring, I do not believe GPinkerton "offered a credible commitment to discontinue per our requirements". What you called my "veiled accusation of collusion/cronyism is in-line with COM:AGF" had nothing to do with what your refer to as this. Krok6kola (talk) 21:28, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
- You've not answered any of my questions. Эlcobbola talk 19:27, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
- @Elcobbola: I am wishing for some other explanation as I want to feel good about the Commons and try to right to the best of my ability. As explained above, I was referring to your review and upholding of my three-day-block by Yann for my total of two reverts of A.Savin. Yann blocked me immediately after his warning to me (although I had replied I would not do it again but was blocked anyway). A.Savin has a history of trying to get me blocked. He cannot do it himself as he has a history of harassing me.[8] so I can only speculate as to why Yann thought my behavior deserved this treatment. Shortly thereafter A.Savin blocked GPinkerton for one day for making over 20 reverts. Two days later Yann blocked GPinkerton for a month. Your review of this block was correct in my opinion. I have a very high opinion of Yann or I would not have risked posting here. Is there not a discrepancy here? I am looking for an understanding. Krok6kola (talk) 19:22, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
- It's curious to see my name proceeded by "It seems Admins on the Commons tend to stand behind each other without questioning", Krok6kola. I visited Category:Requests_for_unblock, as I regularly do, and found a request by GPinkerton, who had been blocked for edit-warring. I looked to see whether this was so. I found and summarized this. Do you believe this was "without questioning"? Do you believe GPinkerton was not edit warring? Do you believe their request acknowledged the issue and offered a credible commitment to discontinue, our requirements? Do you believe your veiled accusation of collusion/cronyism is in-line with COM:AGF? Эlcobbola talk 17:54, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
Ad:Wikimedia Commons has a specific scope
"Your image or other content was recently deleted, or will soon be deleted, in accordance with our process and policies, because it was not, or is not, within our scope." Can you clearify which photos? "Could you please stop trolling on Commons:Administrators' noticeboard." Accousation of "trolling" is false accousation. I'm serious. VVerka5 (talk) 13:55, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
- @VVerka5: This refers to your posting on COM:VP. Regards, Yann (talk) 08:47, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
Should this image be deleted?
Hi, I noticed that you tagged this image (File:19821000 SCOTT HOPKINS 001 RESIZED S.jpg) because it doesn't have a valid and suitable license. It has been more than a week since the tag was added, and there is still no valid license below that image. Thanks. RyanW1995 (talk) 06:56, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
- @RyanW1995: Done There is always a backlog, so it can take longer to delete all files. Regards, Yann (talk) 08:47, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
Board election: voting is open!
Dear member of the Commons Photographers User Group,
The voting phase for our group's board election starts today. Please consider casting your vote. Voting ends on December 17.
I wish you all the best for the rest of the year 2021. Stay safe and healthy! --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 17:03, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
I've discovered this FPC with 7 support, 4 oppose, which should not have been featured but was. What should we do about it? -- Colin (talk) 15:40, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
- Why do you ask me? Yann (talk) 17:20, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
- I thought fixing it might be an admin thing. -- Colin (talk) 18:41, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
- Not special is needed to fix this. Yann (talk) 18:58, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
- I thought fixing it might be an admin thing. -- Colin (talk) 18:41, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
Non-media MOTD nominations
Hell Yann, j'espère que tu vas bien. File:Manuscript of Violin Sonata No. 27 in G major, K. 379.pdf que tu as nommé comme MOTD pour le 27/12 et File:Kipling - Le Livre de la jungle, illustré par de Becque.djvu que tu as nommé comme MOTD pour le 28/12 ne sont pas des images animées ou des sons, bref des "medias". Pourrais-tu les changer stp ? A défaut, je veux bien m'en charger. Cordialement, — Racconish 💬 17:20, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
- @Racconish: La discussion récente a validé ce type de documents dans MOTD, vu le peu de vidéos de qualité. Par ailleurs, même si ce n'est pas l'habitude d'en proposer, ce n'est pas interdit non plus, ce qui a aussi été mentionné dans cette discussion. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 17:27, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
- Merci Yann. J'ai loupé cette discussion. Peux-tu stp me donner un lien ? Cordialement, — Racconish 💬 19:48, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
- @Racconish: COM:VP/P#Change Media of the Day to Media of the Week. Notamment the section "#Enlarging media to include also books" and [9]. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 19:51, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
- Merci. Il y est question de livres, pas de fichiers pdf et la discussion n'est pas conclusive. Il me semblerait préférable d'attendre. Cordialement, — Racconish 💬 19:57, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
- Attendre quoi ? Et sous quelle forme peut-on bien avoir un livre, sinon un fichier PDF ? Yann (talk) 20:00, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
- Un consensus clair (et pas quelques avis sur une branche d'une discussion) et le format djvu. Cordialement, — Racconish 💬 22:28, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
- 1. Le consensus est clair : 5 avis pour, aucun contre. 2. Le format DjVu n'apporte rien dans ce cas. La version PDF est en général de meilleure qualité que la version DjVu. 3. Comme je le dis plus haut, et mentionné dans la discussion, il n'y a aucun règle qui interdit de proposer des livres dans MOTD. Cela permet de diversifier le contenu proposé, et d'offrir du contenu de meilleur qualité. Vraiment, je ne vois pas de problème. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 22:40, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
- Je pense que plusieurs contributeurs, moi compris, avaient cessé de suivre cette longue discussion en jugeant qu'elle ne menait à rien et cette proposition de la vingt-cinquième heure n'aurait à mes yeux de validité que si elle était faite explicitement et non surajoutée dans une discussion sur la périodicité. Sur le fond, je ne crois pas que les fichiers livre soient destinés à illustrer des articles encyclopédiques puisqu'ils sont plutôt destinés à être présentés sur le projet dédié. Il s'agit à mon sens d'une dilution du sens du projet Commons. Cordialement, — Racconish 💬 07:36, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
- 1. Le consensus est clair : 5 avis pour, aucun contre. 2. Le format DjVu n'apporte rien dans ce cas. La version PDF est en général de meilleure qualité que la version DjVu. 3. Comme je le dis plus haut, et mentionné dans la discussion, il n'y a aucun règle qui interdit de proposer des livres dans MOTD. Cela permet de diversifier le contenu proposé, et d'offrir du contenu de meilleur qualité. Vraiment, je ne vois pas de problème. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 22:40, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
- Un consensus clair (et pas quelques avis sur une branche d'une discussion) et le format djvu. Cordialement, — Racconish 💬 22:28, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
- Attendre quoi ? Et sous quelle forme peut-on bien avoir un livre, sinon un fichier PDF ? Yann (talk) 20:00, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
- Merci. Il y est question de livres, pas de fichiers pdf et la discussion n'est pas conclusive. Il me semblerait préférable d'attendre. Cordialement, — Racconish 💬 19:57, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
- @Racconish: COM:VP/P#Change Media of the Day to Media of the Week. Notamment the section "#Enlarging media to include also books" and [9]. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 19:51, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
- Merci Yann. J'ai loupé cette discussion. Peux-tu stp me donner un lien ? Cordialement, — Racconish 💬 19:48, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
A-01 Samenerguss Penis Ultra001.jpg
I did not now that a file uploaded in 14:55, 16 February 2012 and with the last version uploaded in 19:07, 21 November 2016 is considered an recent upload and with 3,970 × 2,232 is considered an low resolution, as you claim in your deletion by (mis)quoting Commons:Nudity#New_uploads.
First an file with almost 10 years is not recent by any stretch as Commons:Nudity#New_uploads is pretty clear that "New files of low resolution or poor quality which provide little descriptive information of a subject we already have files of may be nominated for deletion citing appropriate rationale(s).
You did neither but instead speedy deleted this file, and File:Penis ultra02 to File:Penis ultra08, File:Penis ultra09 erectet.jpg and File:Penis ultra10 Erected Glans.jpg just because... because yes... Being an administrator does not gives you license to override and ignore rules and policies. Tm (talk) 18:24, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
- .If you think this images are out of scope nominate them to deletion, as proper way. Tm (talk) 18:24, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
- You claimed in the author talkpage that the files below, uploaded several years ago, were deleted as being non free and yet in each individual file you claim that this file were deleted based in Commons:Nudity#New_uploads. What are you reaaly claiming to be your rationale to the deletion?
- File:Penis des Menschen - steif von links 01.jpg
- File:Penis des Menschen - steif von rechts 04.jpg
- File:Penis des Menschen - steif von unten 04.jpg
- File:Penis des Menschen - steif von unten 03.jpg
- File:Penis des Menschen - steif von unten 01.jpg
- File:Penis des Menschen - steif von vorne.jpg
- File:Penis des Menschen - steif von links.jpg
- File:Penis des Menschen - steif von rechts 03.jpg
- File:Penis des Menschen - steif von rechts 02.jpg
- File:Penis des Menschen - steif von rechts 01.jpg
- File:Penis des Menschen - steif 01.jpg
- File:Penis des Menschen - steif.jpg
- File:Penis des Menschen - steif mit Lusttropfen.jpg
- File:Penis mit Piercing am Frenulum.jpg
- File:Penis mit Piercing.jpg
- File:Frenum Piercing Ultra00 02.jpg
- File:Frenulum Piercing von Ultra00.jpg
- File:Glans Penis - Leberfleck auf der Eichel (Glans).JPG
- File:Frenulum - Penis mit Pre-Ejaculat.JPG
- File:Penis des Menschen steif - ultra004.JPG
- File:Penis des Menschen steif - ultra003.JPG
- File:Penis des Menschen halb steif - ultra003.JPG
- File:Penis des Menschen schlaff - ultra002.JPG
- File:Penis des Menschen schlaff - ultra00.JPG
- File:Glans Penis Lusttropfen.JPG
- File:Penis steif 03.JPG
- File:Penis steif 02.JPG
- File:Penis steif mit Pre-Ejaculat.JPG
- File:Penis mit Pre-Ejakulat.JPG
- File:Penis Lusttropfen.JPG
- File:A-01 Samenerguss Penis Ultra001.jpg
- File:Penis steif.jpg
- File:Ejaculation Penis Ultra00.ogv
- File:Penis ultra 029 Vorhaut.JPG
- File:Penis ultra028.JPG
- File:Penis ultra026.JPG
- File:Penis025.JPG
- File:Penis ultra023.JPG
- File:Penis ultra019.JPG
- File:Penis ultra017.JPG
- File:Penis ultra015.JPG
- File:Samenerguss ultra 00 2.ogv
- File:Samenerguss ultra001.ogv
- File:Penis ultra 012.JPG
- File:Penis Ultra011.JPG
- File:Penis ultra10 Erected Glans.jpg
- File:Penis ultra09 erectet.jpg
- File:Penis ultra08.jpg
- File:Penis ultra07.jpg
- File:Penis ultra06.jpg
- File:Penis ultra05.jpg
- File:Penis ultra04.jpg
- File:Penis ultra03.jpg
- File:Penis ultra02.jpg
- File:Erected Glans Penis.jpg
- File:Penis ultra.jpg
- File:Masturbation von Ultra00.MTS.ogv
- Tm (talk) 18:41, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
- You claimed in the author talkpage that the files below, uploaded several years ago, were deleted as being non free and yet in each individual file you claim that this file were deleted based in Commons:Nudity#New_uploads. What are you reaaly claiming to be your rationale to the deletion?
- This account is globally locked, so Commons:Nudity certainly does apply. Regards, Yann (talk) 19:45, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
- In what purpose is stated in Commons:Nudity or any other policy or rule that it compulsory to delete files in scope if they are from a globally locked account? In no place speaks about blocked accounts. It is also clear that this files are not new, not low resolution or low quality.
- Please stop making up rules and policies when the explicit ot implicit text does not support any of your actions, making three different reasons to "justify" your out of rukes deletion. Being an administrator does not give you the right to outside of rules and policies and unilaterally delete file just because. Undelete them and, if you think that there is any reason to do so nominate them to deletion and let others discuss it, not shove your unsupported opinion down other peoples throats. Tm (talk) 20:46, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
- This account is globally locked, so Commons:Nudity certainly does apply. Regards, Yann (talk) 19:45, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
I have withdrawn some of the more arguable files. I wish to know why my deletion discussion was closed, was it purely due to its size, why keep the bathwater alongside the baby? Also, why was the discussion closed if all of the voters were uploaders of these images? (Oinkers42) (talk) 15:36, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
- @(Oinkers42): This DR is the wrong way to do. First read the relevant rules here: Commons:Copyright rules by territory/France#Works of arts, including architecture, exhibited in public spaces. Then only select a few files at a time, with a detailed explanation for each. See also Multichill's opinion, who is an experienced contributor. I merely followed his advice. Thanks, Yann (talk) 16:05, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
Telugu-language films to Commons
Hope you are doing fine. I have learned during your Bangalore meet-up few years ago, subsequently done a few uploads of Telugu films using Video2commons. I have subsequently tried to upload a few old (1960 or before) Telugu movies, but met with some error messages. Can you help me, how to come out of the problems. I am seriously planning to upload these Telugu-language films to Commons. Thanking you.--Rajasekhar1961 (talk) 19:15, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
- @Rajasekhar1961: There are some bugs when uploading large files. For some obscure reasons, very large files usually failed. How big is your file? Did you try to create a WEBM format file on your PC, and to upload the result? Regards, Yann (talk) 22:17, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
- I have tried to upload Rojulu Marayi (1955) movie from the Youtube link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F2DvVdlGgI0 . But it is failed with message like this : b'Audio is asked to be kept but the file has no audio tracks.' I have downloaded the movie to my laptop in the .wbm format and then uploaded with video2commons. Please help me.--Rajasekhar1961 (talk) 18:48, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
- I get another error: Error: An exception occurred: AttributeError: b"module 'guess_language' has no attribute 'guessLanguage'". Reported here: Commons talk:Video2commons. There is obviously a bug somewhere. Yann (talk) 19:20, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
- Thank you for taking an initiative to resolve. Hope we get some solution.--Rajasekhar1961 (talk) 19:45, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
- What to do now. Should I stop uploading or is there any way out.--Rajasekhar1961 (talk) 18:34, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
- You can try to download it to your PC, and upload it to Commons. It's long, but it has better chance of working. Regards, Yann (talk) 19:11, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
- What to do now. Should I stop uploading or is there any way out.--Rajasekhar1961 (talk) 18:34, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
- I have tried to upload Rojulu Marayi (1955) movie from the Youtube link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F2DvVdlGgI0 . But it is failed with message like this : b'Audio is asked to be kept but the file has no audio tracks.' I have downloaded the movie to my laptop in the .wbm format and then uploaded with video2commons. Please help me.--Rajasekhar1961 (talk) 18:48, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
- @Rajasekhar1961: Here it is: File:Rojulu Marayi Telugu Full Movie - ANR - Waheeda Rehman - Sowcar Janaki - Old Movies - Divya Media.webm. Could you add more categories please? Yann (talk) 10:17, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
- @Jeff G.: and @Yann: , Thank you both for helping resolve the issue and bringing out this highly successful and evergreen film Rojulu Marayi to the Wikisource. In fact I have tried to upload this full movie after downloading it from Youtube link. Please suggest me the best method of uploading some more old Telugu movies to Wikicommons. Thanking you.Rajasekhar1961 (talk) 11:30, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
- @Rajasekhar1961: You're welcome. Why is File:Rojulu Marayi Telugu Full Movie - ANR - Waheeda Rehman - Sowcar Janaki - Old Movies - Divya Media.webm PD in the US? — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 13:30, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
- Yann, same question. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 23:59, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
- It may be affected by the URAA, but it is difficult to know. Yann (talk) 09:40, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
- @Rajasekhar1961: You are both invited to discuss that at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Rojulu Marayi Telugu Full Movie - ANR - Waheeda Rehman - Sowcar Janaki - Old Movies - Divya Media.webm. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 14:40, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
- It may be affected by the URAA, but it is difficult to know. Yann (talk) 09:40, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
- @Jeff G.: and @Yann: , Thank you both for helping resolve the issue and bringing out this highly successful and evergreen film Rojulu Marayi to the Wikisource. In fact I have tried to upload this full movie after downloading it from Youtube link. Please suggest me the best method of uploading some more old Telugu movies to Wikicommons. Thanking you.Rajasekhar1961 (talk) 11:30, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
Delete different old version
Hello Yann. Please delete the old version of File:Taoist Temple Cebu.jpg by a different user. The different user's photos have been deleted as questionable or outright copyvio, see User talk:Manilaspirit. Regards, JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 06:09, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
- Done Thanks for looking. Yann (talk) 10:39, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
⭐ A file you uploaded is on the main page! ⭐
File:Aiguillecreuse 01 leblanc 128kb.mp3, that you uploaded, is on the main page today. Thank you for your contributions to this project. |
//EatchaBot (talk) 00:00, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Service
Comme je n'y comprends toujours rien sur common's peux-tu vérifier les infos de ce fichier File:Honnert - Les Portes du Monde, 1930.djvu, c'est un manuscrit
- voir aussi ma pdd https://fr.wikisource.org/wiki/Discussion_utilisateur:Le_ciel_est_par_dessus_le_toit#Honnert
- et le livre créé ici https://fr.wikisource.org/wiki/Livre:Honnert_-_Les_Portes_du_Monde,_1930.djvu
s'il n'a pas sa place sur commons peux tu le transférer sur WS stp.
Merci, j'espère que tu vas bien, on ne te vois plus trop sur WS.
Bonne fêtes de fin d'année
--Le ciel est par dessus le toit (talk) 12:16, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
- @Le ciel est par dessus le toit: Vu qu'il n'a pas été publié à l’époque, ce document n'est probablement pas dans le domaine public aux Etats-Unis, mais tant que personne ne dit rien... Yann (talk) 13:00, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
- Merci, pour le "repassage" bon on n'a qu'a croiser les doigts ;) --Le ciel est par dessus le toit (talk) 13:02, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
fyi
Doesn't seem to have held up to their promise to stop commenting [10]. Beeblebrox (talk) 18:17, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Hi Yann, I have sent a release mail to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org but cannot see what's the problem with my licensing of that image as its copyright owner. Apcbg (talk) 12:25, 18 December 2021 (UTC)
- @Apcbg: All documents previously published elsewhere need a confirmation of the license. Thanks, Yann (talk) 12:27, 18 December 2021 (UTC)
- It's documents published here not elsewhere, namely File:Antarctica-Book-368.TIF quoted in the summary of File:Antarctica-Book-Cover.TIF. Apcbg (talk) 13:18, 18 December 2021 (UTC)
- @Apcbg: Sorry, I can't read Cyrillic alphabet. Are you the photographer of the cover? Is the original on Commons? Regards, Yann (talk) 15:54, 18 December 2021 (UTC)
- Yes I am the photographer of the original File:Presian-Ridge.jpg. Apcbg (talk) 16:35, 18 December 2021 (UTC)
- OK, fixed. Thanks for your contribution. Yann (talk) 17:49, 18 December 2021 (UTC)
- Yes I am the photographer of the original File:Presian-Ridge.jpg. Apcbg (talk) 16:35, 18 December 2021 (UTC)
- @Apcbg: Sorry, I can't read Cyrillic alphabet. Are you the photographer of the cover? Is the original on Commons? Regards, Yann (talk) 15:54, 18 December 2021 (UTC)
- It's documents published here not elsewhere, namely File:Antarctica-Book-368.TIF quoted in the summary of File:Antarctica-Book-Cover.TIF. Apcbg (talk) 13:18, 18 December 2021 (UTC)
⭐ A file you uploaded is on the main page! ⭐
File:Alices adventures 01 carroll.ogg, that you uploaded, is on the main page today. Thank you for your contributions to this project. |
//EatchaBot (talk) 00:00, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
Question about Copyright in Japan
Hi Yann, I have a question about copyright on artwork in Japan. There was an artwork on Wiki Commons that was made in circa 1928, but the artist died on February 10, 1972. According to the Copyright law of Japan says this = " in 2004 Japan further extended the copyright term to 70 years for cinematographic works. At the end of 2018, as a result of the Trans-Pacific Partnership negotiations and a requirement stemming from the EU–Japan Economic Partnership Agreement.[3], the 70 year term was applied to all works.[4] This new term was not applied retroactively; works that had entered the public domain between 1999 and 29 December 2018 (inclusive) due to expiration remained in the public domain." So if the 2004 copyright term does not apply retroactively that means 1972 + 50 years = 2022 which means the artwork is in the public domain. Or since it entered the public domain after 29 December 2018, the 70 year term is applied instead of the 50 year term. What do you think about this? -Artanisen (talk) 19:40, 18 December 2021 (UTC)
- @Artanisen: I am not sure. You better ask on COM:VPC. Regards, Yann (talk) 08:48, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
PD-India-URAA
This template {{PD-India-URAA}} to applied in films, television, and other works in India under URAA in the United States (where Wikicommons is hosted)? --RandomGerman (talk) 07:23, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
- No, this template means that the work is free of URAA. Regards, Yann (talk) 08:47, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
Photo deleted from Wikimedia commons
Hi, Yan! The photo from an article that I am working on was deleted. I would like to know what was mistaken. I am new here and am still learning how to create articles in wikipedia and how to upload pictures. Could you please help me to get it back into the article?Was there anything missing? please help me to include all the info you need to accept it in commons Many thanks in advance for your support. — Preceding unsigned comment added by OndaQ (talk • contribs) 17:29, 22 December 2021 (UTC) (UTC)
- @OndaQ: I suppose you mean File:MARCOS SIFU PHOTO WIKIPEDIA.jpg. This small image has no author mentioned. It was tagged as "no source" and "no permission". Who is the photographer? Thanks, Yann (talk) 17:34, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
Deletion request
Hi Yann - thanks for dealing with Commons:Deletion requests/File:Sokół wędrowny przy gnieżdzie na Pałacu Kultury i Nauki w Warszawie.jpg a couple of months ago; could you also deal with the related Commons:Deletion requests/File:Sokoły wędrowne gniazdo Pałac Kultury i Nauki w Warszawie.jpg, please? I nominated it at the same time, but seems to have been overlooked. Thanks! - MPF (talk) 17:04, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
- @MPF: Actually a webcam image may be OK. I would ask on COM:VPC. Thanks, Yann (talk) 17:28, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks! I'll add a note there - MPF (talk) 18:29, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
- @MPF: I did already. Yann (talk) 18:37, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks; yep, I saw :-) MPF (talk) 18:42, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
- @MPF: I did already. Yann (talk) 18:37, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks! I'll add a note there - MPF (talk) 18:29, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
⭐ A file you uploaded is on the main page! ⭐
File:Timemachine 01 wells.mp3, that you uploaded, is on the main page today. Thank you for your contributions to this project. |
//EatchaBot (talk) 00:00, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Check image name
Hello Yann, can you please check this image name? The artist is unknown so I requested to improve the filename. -Artanisen (talk) 19:23, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
- @Artanisen: Yann (talk) 19:32, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks for your help. Happy holidays and Merry Christmas -Artanisen (talk) 21:09, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Merry Christmas
Merry Christmas Yann | |
Hi Yann, I wish you and your family a very Merry Christmas Share similar holiday wishes by adding {{subst:User:Davey2010/MerryChristmas}} to your friends' talk pages.
|
Deleting uploads
I don't mind the deleting of my uploads. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ChristianDraken (talk • contribs) 13:54, 24 December 2021 (UTC) (UTC)
Happy holidays 2021/2022!
Happy Christmas and new year holidays
Merry Christmas and new year, Yann | |
Hi Yann, Have a sweet and |
⭐ A file you uploaded is on the main page! ⭐
File:A Native Street in India (1906).webm, that you uploaded, is on the main page today. Thank you for your contributions to this project. |
//EatchaBot (talk) 00:00, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Edit Delete Request Comment
Hello Yann, can you please edit my comment here to add that "A different license applies to this photo."? I wanted to add it, but the deletion debate was closed. Merry Christmas. -Artanisen (talk) 22:55, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
- Thank you. Take care. -Artanisen (talk) 09:47, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
⭐ A file you uploaded is on the main page! ⭐
File:Manuscript of Violin Sonata No. 27 in G major, K. 379.pdf, that you uploaded, is on the main page today. Thank you for your contributions to this project. |
//EatchaBot (talk) 00:00, 27 December 2021 (UTC)
Blocking? Why?
I am the owner of account User talk:Molecule 2211. My old account is user talk:Molecule2015. Now that account I lost the password so I just registered a new one. I specialize in downloading new versions of chemical images for bad images, especially those of user talk:Hoa112008 and User talk:Claudio Pistilli,... Why do you think I'm the sock puppet of those two accounts? And that old account lost its password, how can I get it back?--1.54.208.43 02:10, 28 December 2021 (UTC)Molecule 2211
- Molecule 2211 was blocked by Elcobbola, as checkuser. So you have to ask him. If you didn't add an email to your account, you can't get back the password. Thanks, Yann (talk) 08:35, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
Watercolor paintings by Edward Lawton Moss
Happy NY Yann, I don't understand the need for a cat Category:Watercolor paintings by Edward Lawton Moss. There is not enough content to justify it and there never will be. Besides that, the spelling, this is a British author not American... Broichmore (talk) 12:25, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
- @Broichmore: 3 files is more than enough to create a category. The point is to clean Category:Watercolor paintings, moving files in subcategories. We need to have a consistent hierarchy from the main category, but you can create a redirect Category:Watercolour paintings by Edward Lawton Moss if you find this useful. Thanks, Yann (talk) 12:31, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
- I just dont get that as a reason Edward Lawton Moss will be empty. Why have empty cats? This is not an artist as such. He is a naval officer recording what he has seen. This proliferation of branches on a tree, over complicates the project, and adds overhead to the people who upload files, and or cat them from scratch. Do you not agree? Broichmore (talk) 12:38, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
- In this case, no. Works should as much as possible be in a category named "Works by ...", not in the main category. Regards, Yann (talk) 20:52, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
- I just dont get that as a reason Edward Lawton Moss will be empty. Why have empty cats? This is not an artist as such. He is a naval officer recording what he has seen. This proliferation of branches on a tree, over complicates the project, and adds overhead to the people who upload files, and or cat them from scratch. Do you not agree? Broichmore (talk) 12:38, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
Rename of File:Paul Gauguin 144.jpg
Hi Yann, I noticed your rename of File:Paul Gauguin 144.jpg. This file has had the same name for over 15 years and is in line with the naming convention of Category:PD-Art (Yorck Project). Your rename of this file seems to be not in line with the basic principle of Commons:File renaming that file names should be stable. Give the fact that the file shouldn't have been overwritten you should probably split the history and leave the recent revision at File:Parau api, by Paul Gauguin.jpg and move the old Yorck file to File:Paul Gauguin 144.jpg. Can you do that? Multichill (talk) 20:29, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
- @Multichill: "Names should be stable" is only applicable if the name is meaningful. The previous name is clearly not good. It is ambiguous, and not precise enough. I let a redirect, so there is no problem with a renaming. Regards, Yann (talk) 20:48, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
Request for photo File:Prima varianta.jpg
Hello Yann,
Please provide me with an email address and what exactly you want me to send you as I am the one who took that photo with my cellphone.
I don't know exactly what should I send you as I am the one you took the photo and also I am the one who created the wikipedia page for the romanian actor Petrica Popa.
I am looking forward to hearing from you.
Happy holidays! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gapopa (talk • contribs) 13:14, 29 December 2021 (UTC) (UTC)
- @Gapopa: Hi,
- Please sign with
~~~~
. - Please see COM:VRT for the procedure to send the permission. Thanks, Yann (talk) 13:14, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
⭐ A file you uploaded is on the main page! ⭐
File:AudioCité - Discours de la Servitude volontaire.mp3, that you uploaded, is on the main page today. Thank you for your contributions to this project. |
//EatchaBot (talk) 00:00, 30 December 2021 (UTC)
⭐ A file you uploaded is on the main page! ⭐
File:Bhabhi - 1938.webm, that you uploaded, is on the main page today. Thank you for your contributions to this project. |
//EatchaBot (talk) 00:00, 31 December 2021 (UTC)
The Image you deleted
You deleted an image by mistake, I believe. The image was sent to me by the owner. She asked me to help her create a wikipedia page. Kindly restore the image ASAP. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Haqulix (talk • contribs) 10:32, 1 January 2022 (UTC) (UTC)
- @Haqulix:
- 1. Please sign with
~~~~
- 2. Please provide a file name.
- 3. Since you are not the author, you need to follow the procedure at COM:VRT. Regards, Yann (talk) 10:32, 1 January 2022 (UTC)
Rename category
Can we rename the category Emperor Kammu to Emperor Kanmu? Because the spelling Kanmu is more accurate according to the Japanese spelling (かんむてんのう)-Artanisen (talk) 15:15, 1 January 2022 (UTC)
- Done Yann (talk) 16:11, 1 January 2022 (UTC)
- Thank you and happy new year. -Artanisen (talk) 17:50, 1 January 2022 (UTC)
hi mr yann, i am writing to ask you if you could see me this portrait executed in the seventeenth century, and eliminated ignoring the fact that the charger respected the painting's fiormations in loading it, and eliminated because the charger would be an LTA. but if you will see the file comparisons information it does not prove a copyviol--2.36.102.117 18:22, 1 January 2022 (UTC)
- @Ruthven: as deleting admin. Your opinion? Yann (talk) 19:27, 1 January 2022 (UTC)
- Hi Yann! It's still A3cb1 trying to get his files restored, testing different admins. Bonne année ! Ruthven (msg) 20:10, 1 January 2022 (UTC)
⭐ A file you uploaded is on the main page! ⭐
File:Cityatworldsend 01 hamilton.mp3, that you uploaded, is on the main page today. Thank you for your contributions to this project. |
//EatchaBot (talk) 00:00, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
Deletions and user notifications
Thanks for the quick response and the notification of the user. At least the notification maybe should have done by me ... but when it comes to multiple copyvios I'm somewhat lacking AGF, but you handled it the proper way and I'll try to think about that next time too! Mirer (talk) 12:41, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
Hi,
Shouldn't the page be split? These are different editions. Ankry (talk) 15:12, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
- @Ankry: Ah yes. The older version had a bug, but it seems OK now. Yann (talk) 16:21, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
- It seems my (failed) attempt to reupload fixed the metadata. Maybe, a good news. I will check other DjVu files. But IMO, it is still worth to separate the books, even if only one of them is processed in Wikisource. Ankry (talk) 19:10, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
- Done Yann (talk) 19:24, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
- It seems my (failed) attempt to reupload fixed the metadata. Maybe, a good news. I will check other DjVu files. But IMO, it is still worth to separate the books, even if only one of them is processed in Wikisource. Ankry (talk) 19:10, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
Queries releated deleting my content
hi,i want to know what are the reasons for deletion of my content,even it was my own work.I just want to know the reasons for deletion of all work. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sakib2501 (talk • contribs) 16:22, 2 January 2022 (UTC) (UTC)
- @Sakib2501: Even if you made the logos yourself, there are derivative works. You need the copyright holder's formal written permission for a free license to publish them here. Regards, Yann (talk) 16:25, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
Clearing out my undeletion request backlog from last year. Paul Nash was British and died in 1946. Abzeronow (talk) 17:58, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
- Done --Yann (talk) 19:10, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
How we will see unregistered users
Hi!
You get this message because you are an admin on a Wikimedia wiki.
When someone edits a Wikimedia wiki without being logged in today, we show their IP address. As you may already know, we will not be able to do this in the future. This is a decision by the Wikimedia Foundation Legal department, because norms and regulations for privacy online have changed.
Instead of the IP we will show a masked identity. You as an admin will still be able to access the IP. There will also be a new user right for those who need to see the full IPs of unregistered users to fight vandalism, harassment and spam without being admins. Patrollers will also see part of the IP even without this user right. We are also working on better tools to help.
If you have not seen it before, you can read more on Meta. If you want to make sure you don’t miss technical changes on the Wikimedia wikis, you can subscribe to the weekly technical newsletter.
We have two suggested ways this identity could work. We would appreciate your feedback on which way you think would work best for you and your wiki, now and in the future. You can let us know on the talk page. You can write in your language. The suggestions were posted in October and we will decide after 17 January.
Thank you. /Johan (WMF)
18:11, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
⭐ A file you uploaded is on the main page! ⭐
File:Fables 01 03 lafontaine.mp3, that you uploaded, is on the main page today. Thank you for your contributions to this project. |
//EatchaBot (talk) 00:00, 8 January 2022 (UTC)
Your most memorable shot of 2021
Happy New Year! As always at the beginning of the new year, I'm inviting you to share your most memorable shot of the past year. Which of your photos stood out in 2021? Which image created special memories that you'd like to share with others? On behalf of the Commons Photographers User Group I wish you, your family, and your friends all the best for 2022. Warmly, --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 03:25, 8 January 2022 (UTC)
Hawaiian Division patch
Yann, Thank You for cntacting me.
Can you upload it for me the way its supposed to be done, this one, the Hawaiian Division is really only one of two images I want to add to a Wiki page. I did this because the one that was three was a completely wrong shoulder patch for this U.S. Army Division of the 1920s -1930s Photo came from Pinterest via the U.S. Miiltaria Forum I think. The other one I want to add is the 93rd Infantry Brigade their unit crest, this one came of of Worthpoint, and was sold long time ago, Worthpoint just saves images of everything from old sales to "Show" it's Worth.
Here's the other one, if you can add it the way it's supposed to be please.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/93rd_Infantry_Brigade_(United_States) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Waspranger (talk • contribs) 09:48, 8 January 2022 (UTC) (UTC)
- @Waspranger: Hi,
- Please sign your messages with
~~~~
. - There are 2 copyrights for each of your images: one for the picture, one for the badge design. For the later, it is probably OK as a work of a US governement employee. For the other, you need the formal written permission from the photographer. Please see COM:VRT for the procedure. Thanks, Yann (talk) 09:52, 8 January 2022 (UTC)
File:A Throw of Dice, 1929.webm has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Scram6699 (talk) 14:30, 8 January 2022 (UTC)
Since I saw some Andre Gide works in your contributions, would be possible to undelete this file since it appears to be free from French copyright? Abzeronow (talk) 17:33, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
- Done --Yann (talk) 19:07, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
⭐ A file you uploaded is on the main page! ⭐
File:J'accuse, d'Émile Zola, par Audiocite.mp3, that you uploaded, is on the main page today. Thank you for your contributions to this project. |
//EatchaBot (talk) 00:00, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
File:Sreelekha Mitra image.png
Hello, the file (now deleted) File:Sreelekha Mitra image.png was taken from a YouTube video, which was under the creative commons license, and the video was the creator's original work. The video URL was mentioned in the image. --Tito Dutta (talk) 11:03, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
- @Titodutta: Hi Tito,
- How are you?
- I restored the video, but I don't see a free license at the source. Did I miss something? Regards, Yann (talk) 11:12, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks, possibly they changed that later. It is unfortunate. I checked my other uploads at User:Titodutta/YouTube. It looks like this file needs to be deleted as well File:Ujaan Ganguly image.png. --Tito Dutta (talk) 11:21, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
- How about writing to them? Did you check Internet Archive? You should always ask for a license review when you upload free content from outside Commons. Yann (talk) 12:13, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks, possibly they changed that later. It is unfortunate. I checked my other uploads at User:Titodutta/YouTube. It looks like this file needs to be deleted as well File:Ujaan Ganguly image.png. --Tito Dutta (talk) 11:21, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
⭐ A file you uploaded is on the main page! ⭐
File:Crossing of a stream between Nubra valley and Pangong lake.webm, that you uploaded, is on the main page today. Thank you for your contributions to this project. |
//EatchaBot (talk) 00:00, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
Category des couvertures de livres
Bonjour, merci de cette information mais je vois aussi : Category:PD ineligible (books)
or il semble que cet automatisme ne fonctionne pas, y-a-t-il un bug quelque part ? - bien cordialement - Siren-Com (talk) 17:45, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
- @Siren-Com: Pour cela, il fut utiliser
{{PD-ineligible|type=books}}
. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 19:21, 12 January 2022 (UTC)- Bon, alors faut tout reprendre ? l'encadré ci-dessus n'est pas clair du tout (ça ne m'étonne pas !) - Siren-Com (talk) 23:55, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
- @Siren-Com: Oui, tu peux compléter la licence, mais ce n'est pas faux sans "type=books". Cordialement, Yann (talk) 09:05, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
- Bon, alors faut tout reprendre ? l'encadré ci-dessus n'est pas clair du tout (ça ne m'étonne pas !) - Siren-Com (talk) 23:55, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Review
Hi. Can you help me review YouTube files in Category:Oanh Kiều. Thanks. ⁂๖ۣۜJon ♥ ๖ۣۜDaenerys໖ 14:35, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted images of paintings by Nate Dunn
Hello,
A number of images that I uploaded of paintings of Nate Dunn were deleted. Among the deleted files were the following ones:
- File:"Abstract I" by Nate Dunn, Undated.jpg
- File:"Abstract II" by Nate Dunn, Undated.jpg
- File:"Abstract" by Nate Dunn, Undated.jpg
- File:"Bottle and Glasses" by Nate Dunn, Undated.jpg
- File:"Bridge Building" by Nate Dunn, Undated.jpg
- File:"Harbor Scene" by Nate Dunn, 1955.jpg
- File:"Pitcher and Fruit" by Nate Dunn, 1952.jpg
- File:"Still Life" by Nate Dunn, 1954.jpg
- File:"Street Scene" by Nate Dunn, Undated.jpg
- File:"The Cove" (v.2) by Nate Dunn, 1959.jpg
- File:"The Cove" (v.3) by Nate Dunn, 1959.jpg
- File:"The Harbor" by Nate Dunn, 1957.jpg
I personally own every one of these paintings whose images were deleted from commons and the "Works" section of the Nate Dunn Wikipedia Page, including Abstract 1, Abstract 2, etc. and each painting clearly bears Nate Dunn's signature. The paintings were largely purchased from auction houses and many of the paintings could be identified from lists in catalogues. The comment on the deletion of the images from commons suggests that works are not from Nate Dunn but they definitely are his works. Can you please let me know what is required for these images to be allowed in commons and also what the correct Creative Commons Attribution would be ? I would like them to be undeleted or to be able to upload them again to creative commons with the correct attribution.
Thanks, eejjcc — Preceding unsigned comment added by Eejjcc (talk • contribs) 20:48, 13 January 2022 (UTC) (UTC)
- @Eejjcc: Hi,
- Please sign with
~~~~
. - Paintigns by Nate Dunn are a priori not in the public domain (at least you need to prove that they were published before 1926, or without a copyright notice). Therefore a formal written permission from their copyright holder(s) is needed to host them on Commons. Please see COM:VRT for the procedure. Please read Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Nate Dunn. Regards, Yann (talk) 20:48, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
Commons:First steps
Apologies, didn't catch your ping before Commons:Village_pump/Archive/2021/12#Commons:First_steps was archived. Commons:Premiers pas is a redirect to Commons:First steps/fr, which is listed in the larger <languages />
at the top of the page. I intended to redirect or migrate more of the manually translated versions so that the second languages box could be eliminated, but decided to leave it after noticing the differences between Commons:Primeiros passos and Commons:First steps/pt. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 22:30, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
⭐ A file you uploaded is on the main page! ⭐
File:Contes humoristiques 01 gautier.ogg, that you uploaded, is on the main page today. Thank you for your contributions to this project. |
//EatchaBot (talk) 00:00, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
Problem user
Jawico666 (whom you blocked) is using their talk page for a series of attacks on Rod Hull. Should the response be:
- Ignore it, and leave them to a page no-one cares about anyway.
- Block TP access too / seek a global ban. This would be best in principle, but would they just turn into a sock and return to pages we care about?
- Ignore it, because Rod Hull is now fair game on Wikimedia projects?
Andy Dingley (talk) 03:17, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
- Hi,
- Taivo already blocked talk page access. I removed the attack/harassment. Thanks, Yann (talk) 12:19, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
⭐ A file you uploaded is on the main page! ⭐
File:Narrow gauge railway line Gwalior to Sheopur, 2.webm, that you uploaded, is on the main page today. Thank you for your contributions to this project. |
//EatchaBot (talk) 00:00, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
Media of the Day
Just curious, but as you appear to be highly active in this field and notified me that there are quite a bit more MOTD files in the VPP thread, are the issues that were brought up several months ago (last year) still relevant to the MOTD system or have they now been addressed? As then a new discussion can be opened in light of the developments that have taken place since the discussion started and we simply ping everyone who voted in the previous discussion to see if they are persuaded by the new developments, as well as the three (3) separate new policies that were proposed (and accepted) to save the MOTD system. Please ping. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 12:23, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
- Yes, I think that the MOTW proposal was on overreaction to some MOTD issues. Yes, some videos shown on MOTS were of poor quality. Some people questioned the idea to show videos of demonstrations against vaccination and vaccination pass. The Featured Media contest is effectively dead, so there is no chance that it would produce even enough Featured Media for MOTW. However there is no shortage of good and interesting free media, to be shown on MOTD. We need a bit more activity and diversity to fill up the empty days. I nearly filled up a whole month by myself. Regards, Yann (talk) 13:29, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
- Excuse the late reaction, as I wasn't pinged. Anyhow, once allowing PDF files is allowed I think that I can propose quite a number of books, both well-known books and some lesser known works that have been important in their own ways could be used for the main page. This would easily fill up the MOTD. But in general the best solution would be having more users that work with it. Maybe we could have standard days for media types but I am not how much is available, there are numerous books at the Wikimedia Commons, I think maybe even more than Project Gutenberg (which had 50.000 items as of 3 October 2015). --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 13:43, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
- @Donald Trung: Thanks. I try to have diversity, i.e. having a mix of videos, music of various styles and origins, speeches, recording of novels and poetry, PDF and DjVU documents (books, music scores...) which are notable and have some visual features, and not having the same type of media two following days, or even in the same week. I agree that it is quite easy to fill the whole MOTD with that. I also try whenever possible to have a media which matches a particular anniversary or a special day (e.g. see March 8th, for the Day for the Rights of Women). And yes, having more users would be good. Regards, Yann (talk) 16:04, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
- Excuse the late reaction, as I wasn't pinged. Anyhow, once allowing PDF files is allowed I think that I can propose quite a number of books, both well-known books and some lesser known works that have been important in their own ways could be used for the main page. This would easily fill up the MOTD. But in general the best solution would be having more users that work with it. Maybe we could have standard days for media types but I am not how much is available, there are numerous books at the Wikimedia Commons, I think maybe even more than Project Gutenberg (which had 50.000 items as of 3 October 2015). --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 13:43, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
⭐ A file you uploaded is on the main page! ⭐
File:Declaration des Droits de la Femme, par Olympe de Gouges.mp3, that you uploaded, is on the main page today. Thank you for your contributions to this project. |
//EatchaBot (talk) 00:00, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
User:Pixeldost/license CC-BY-SA-3.0de P
Hi Yann, I noticed that some files don't have a license because you deleted User:Pixeldost/license CC-BY-SA-3.0de P. I'm not really seeing what's deletion-worthy in that page, aside from User:Pixeldost/mfmHinweis. Would you consider restoring it? User:Pixeldost/license CC-BY-SA-3.0de seems to be pretty much the same as the deleted version, just without {{Personality rights}}. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 03:22, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
- @AntiCompositeNumber: Hi, I restored that page. IMO it would be much better to substitute it with the included templates. Regards, Yann (talk) 11:03, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks. It is unfortunate that too many people do not follow the Commons:User-specific galleries, templates and categories § Regarding licenses guideline. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 16:42, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
Madame Rasimi et showgirls, portrait de groupe
Bonjour, J'ai importé le fichier . pour illustrer l'article de wikipedia en français : Madame_Rasimi. Le site source site source indique une licence CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 (Ces images et fichiers peuvent être consultés, sauvegardés et distribués sans but commercial, à condition qu'il soit précisé qu'ils appartiennent à l'Institut national d'anthropologie et d'histoire du Mexique ainsi que le droit d'auteur correspondant et l'hyperlien complet au sein de la médiathèque INAH.). Pouvez vous vérifier que je pouvais télecharger cette image et que j'ai attribué la bonne license. Merci d'avance. Cordialement--Thcollet (talk) 16:17, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
- Done. J'ai trouvé la réponse « les représentations fidèles des œuvres d'art du domaine public en deux dimensions sont dans le domaine public et les exigences contraires sont une attaque contre le concept même de domaine public ». Bon dimanche. Cordialement. --Thcollet (talk) 04:19, 23 January 2022 (UTC)
⭐ A file you uploaded is on the main page! ⭐
File:Arabian Epic music.opus, that you uploaded, is on the main page today. Thank you for your contributions to this project. |
//EatchaBot (talk) 00:00, 23 January 2022 (UTC)
Signifcant criteria
Hi Yann, I deleted a file which is now discussed for undeletion. Could you please explain what you mean with "significant criteria" in this remark. Being a fairly new admin, I did not see this before. Thanks, Ellywa (talk) 08:29, 23 January 2022 (UTC)
- @Ellywa: Hi, There is precisely a discussion about that on Commons talk:Project scope/Precautionary principle. Regards, Yann (talk) 10:12, 23 January 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks, I will follow that discussion. In this particular case the image appears an en:Orphan work. As far as know these are copyrighted. At Commons it is decided to assume not in PD until 120 years after the original image was made. As beginning admin I try to stick to our guidelines closely. I had no doubt in this case. But it is a pity. As VRT agent I refused so many family album images of relevant people based on this. We will see how the discussion will lead to change of the guidelines. Ellywa (talk) 12:56, 23 January 2022 (UTC)
- @Ellywa: Family album images are IMO a special case, as most of them were never published before. In addition, copyright for unpublished images are quite dependent of the country of origin. For example, anonymous unpublished images from before 1937 are in the public domain in France and in USA. French anonymous unpublished images from 1937 to 1951 are in the public domain in France, but still under a copyright in USA. But if I publish of them on Commons for the first time, I own a new copyright for 25 years, and I can therefore release them under a free license. Regards, Yann (talk) 13:49, 23 January 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks, I will follow that discussion. In this particular case the image appears an en:Orphan work. As far as know these are copyrighted. At Commons it is decided to assume not in PD until 120 years after the original image was made. As beginning admin I try to stick to our guidelines closely. I had no doubt in this case. But it is a pity. As VRT agent I refused so many family album images of relevant people based on this. We will see how the discussion will lead to change of the guidelines. Ellywa (talk) 12:56, 23 January 2022 (UTC)
⭐ A file you uploaded is on the main page! ⭐
File:Homage to Mysore Sri Vasudevacharya No 129 Vocal Concert by Vid Aparna Sundararaman Singapore & Team.webm, that you uploaded, is on the main page today. Thank you for your contributions to this project. |
//EatchaBot (talk) 00:00, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
⭐ A file you uploaded is on the main page! ⭐
File:Alcools 03 apollinaire 128kb.mp3, that you uploaded, is on the main page today. Thank you for your contributions to this project. |
//EatchaBot (talk) 00:00, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
The image is not a personal image, but a mascot for the site. Please restore.--Thyj (talk) 12:20, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
- @Thyj: Which site? Yann (talk) 12:31, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
- Inai Inai Baa! Wiki, Short name is IIBWiki. Because Category:Xu Jiawei (IIBWiki), be mistaken for Xu Jiawei herself.--Thyj (talk) 12:34, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
- @Thyj: I am not sure this is an allowed use of Commons. See COM:WEBHOST. BTW File:Inai Inai Baa! Wiki.svg seems too complex for this license. We probably need a permission from the copyright holder. Thanks, Yann (talk) 12:41, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
- The content of IIBWiki (except for the lyrics and most of the images about Inai Inai Baa!) is published under CC-BY-SA. Thyj (talk) 12:48, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
- This image is proof that the author created the mascot character. Thyj (talk) 13:51, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
- @Thyj: I am not sure this is an allowed use of Commons. See COM:WEBHOST. BTW File:Inai Inai Baa! Wiki.svg seems too complex for this license. We probably need a permission from the copyright holder. Thanks, Yann (talk) 12:41, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
- Inai Inai Baa! Wiki, Short name is IIBWiki. Because Category:Xu Jiawei (IIBWiki), be mistaken for Xu Jiawei herself.--Thyj (talk) 12:34, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
Fixed uploads
Just a quick thanks for finishing up with those author fixes - I got through half of them then went to bed! The idea of the creator template is great, but it really only works with wikidata 😊 ~TNT (she/they • talk) 20:14, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
⭐ A file you uploaded is on the main page! ⭐
File:Deva Premal & Miten with Manose- Gayatri Mantra Live in Concert ~ Sydney, 2020.webm, that you uploaded, is on the main page today. Thank you for your contributions to this project. |
//EatchaBot (talk) 00:00, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
Thanks for restoring it. I've sent a message to the uploader asking if they wish to license their photo as CC-BY-SA 4.0. They haven't been active since 2013 so I don't know if they'll respond. Abzeronow (talk) 17:55, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
Please discuss here, thank you! Hekerui (talk) 11:10, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
A question
Hello Yann. Thank you for your message. I am not a very active user but I am happy that I could add some valuable files that are free (one of them was nominated for media of the day in September 2020). I found that a user (I don't know them) has said that I am a vandal and that I lied in the past (linking this page: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Saddam Hussein..jpg) but I don't remember any comments there. I also don't remember uploading that file. I am sorry about comments of this user. Is this OK to say such things about another user without a reason? HeminKurdistan (talk) 14:59, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
- Hi HeminKurdistan,
- I would not give much weight to what Ypatch said. He has only very few contributions, and his report seems to be politically motivated. Regards, Yann (talk) 16:15, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
⭐ A file you uploaded is on the main page! ⭐
File:Guy de Maupassant - Bel ami P1 Chap01.mp3, that you uploaded, is on the main page today. Thank you for your contributions to this project. |
//EatchaBot (talk) 00:00, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
⭐ A file you uploaded is on the main page! ⭐
File:Solo Oud and Ceramic Darbuka - Arab Instruments.webm, that you uploaded, is on the main page today. Thank you for your contributions to this project. |
//EatchaBot (talk) 00:00, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
⭐ A file you uploaded is on the main page! ⭐
File:Walking, by Henry David Thoreau, section 1.ogg, that you uploaded, is on the main page today. Thank you for your contributions to this project. |
//EatchaBot (talk) 00:00, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
You already voted in the DR discussion. You're not supposed to close it, are you? I suggest you reverse the closure and reopen it please. George Ho (talk) 07:32, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
As I saw, you also closed Commons:Undeletion requests/Current requests#File:Flag of the Australian Aborigines.svg. However, you've been involved in the flag discussion. I fail to see why you're qualified to do so. --George Ho (talk) 07:38, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
Just in case, I brought your closures for review at Commons:Administrators' noticeboard#Closure review on talks about File:Australian Aboriginal Flag.svg. --George Ho (talk) 07:53, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
- @George Ho: That's really not necessary. Deletion requests are not votes. The decision is based on copyright law, not on opinions. The rules are clear, the flag is in the public domain due to age, whether you like it or not. Yann (talk) 08:37, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
OpenRefine and Structured Data on Commons: community meetup, February 22
Hello! You are receiving this message because you signed up for updates about Structured Data on Commons (SDC) functionalities in OpenRefine.
The OpenRefine team has made quite a bit of progress in the past months. We warmly invite you to a meetup with updates and a first demo of the newly developed SDC editing functionalities in OpenRefine. Bring your questions!
- When? Tuesday, February 22, at 15:00-17:00 UTC (check the time in your timezone).
- For whom? For anyone who is curious about the current status of SDC support in OpenRefine!
- Where? Online, via Zoom. The event's info page has the link.
- The meeting will be recorded and the recording will be published to Wikimedia Commons afterwards.
Check the event page for more info. With kind regards, SFauconnier (talk) 14:50, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
File:Zindagi (1940) cover of booklet.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
George Ho (talk) 20:52, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
suppression de fichiers sur Wikimedia Commons
Bonjour Yann Ayant eu des problèmes de santé, je n'ai pas pu reprendre mes contributions sur Wikipedia depuis fin novembre 2021. Pouvant à présent reprendre ma "plume" Wikipedia, je viens de constater que, sauf erreur, vous avez contribué à la suppression de près d'une vingtaine de fichiers que j'avais placé sur Wikimedia. Pourrait-on reprendre cette discussion en vue de restituer ces fichiers ? Comme je suis un peu néophyte, merci de m'indiquer la marche à suivre. NB : j'ai envoyé un message similaire à @Halbertix: . Bien à vous, — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pierrovolimage (talk • contribs) 14:28, 5 February 2022 (UTC) (UTC)
- @Pierrovolimage: Bonjour,
- Merci de signer avec
~~~~
. - Il fait indiquer une licence valide pour vos fichiers. Vous ne pouvez pas utiliser une licence CC-BY-SA, sauf si vous êtes le seul et unique créateur du document. C'est le cas, par ex., de File:Portait Edouard Frankinet par Alex Daoust.jpg, File:Micheline Quintin dessinant v.1954.jpg et File:Signature Micheline Quintin.jpg.
- Comme indiqué dans Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Pierrovolimage, il faut une autorisation écrite formelle pour importer ces fichiers sur Commons. C'est aussi le cas si le document a été publié ailleurs auparavant, i.e. File:Charles J. Duyver portrait.jpg. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 14:28, 5 February 2022 (UTC)
⭐ A file you uploaded is on the main page! ⭐
File:Gustave Flaubert - L Education sentimentale P1 Chap01 V2.mp3, that you uploaded, is on the main page today. Thank you for your contributions to this project. |
//EatchaBot (talk) 00:01, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Help restore deleted files
Hi @Yann: , can you help restore these files:
- File:IMG-20211229-WA0000.jpg
- File:IMG-20211128-WA0063.jpg
- File:IMG-20211128-WA0064.jpg
- File:IMG-20220123-WA0058.jpg
- File:IMG-20220131-WA0000.jpg
- File:לוי דוכמן עם הנשיא herzog.jpg
- File:IMG-20220105-WA0009.jpg
- File:IMG-20211217-WA0009.jpg
We have received VRT email for releasing these files from an official website. Thank you for your support! --Satdeep Gill (talk) 07:56, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
- @Satdeep Gill: IS it the same ticket number for all these files? Thanks, Yann (talk) 12:29, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
- @Yann: Yes, it is the same ticket for all the files. --Satdeep Gill (talk) 14:12, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
- @Satdeep Gill: Done, but there is no file by the name File:לוי דוכמן עם הנשיא herzog.jpg. Yann (talk) 17:04, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
- @Yann: Yes, it is the same ticket for all the files. --Satdeep Gill (talk) 14:12, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
⭐ A file you uploaded is on the main page! ⭐
File:Mélanges autographes, volume 17, Marc Charpentier.pdf, that you uploaded, is on the main page today. Thank you for your contributions to this project. |
//EatchaBot (talk) 00:00, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
⭐ A file you uploaded is on the main page! ⭐
File:Tour monde 01 verne.mp3, that you uploaded, is on the main page today. Thank you for your contributions to this project. |
//EatchaBot (talk) 00:01, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
Please tag this on the user talk page {{End of copyvios}} for repeated uploading of non-free files. --GreenPollock (talk) 07:22, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
- Done --Yann (talk) 10:06, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
⭐ A file you uploaded is on the main page! ⭐
File:War-of-the-Worlds-1938-Radio-Broadcast-136kbps-cleaned.mp3, that you uploaded, is on the main page today. Thank you for your contributions to this project. |
//EatchaBot (talk) 00:00, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
⭐ A file you uploaded is on the main page! ⭐
File:Chanson populaire bretonne, enreg. par Léon Azoulay.mp3, that you uploaded, is on the main page today. Thank you for your contributions to this project. |
//EatchaBot (talk) 00:00, 21 February 2022 (UTC)
Need guidance
Hello, please see this deletion request. This is PD-India book. We will loose many such valuable PD books if only PD-US is considered. Could you please guide us on any alternative? --सुबोध कुलकर्णी (talk) 05:17, 21 February 2022 (UTC)
Copyright violations
Hi these two accounts belongs to one person who constantly uploads works with tag of own work and fake license. all of this files are copy right violation. this person violated commons rules constantly.
even one of accounts was closed for one week but still this users account its illegal acts
please block both these accounts
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Ahvazahvaz
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Arianahvaz
[[User:Modern Sciences|MSes]] (talk) 08:44, 22 February 2022 (UTC)
- Done I blocked the main account for one month, and the second account indef. Yann (talk) 09:21, 22 February 2022 (UTC)
⭐ A file you uploaded is on the main page! ⭐
File:Mysterechambrejaune 01 leroux.mp3, that you uploaded, is on the main page today. Thank you for your contributions to this project. |
//EatchaBot (talk) 00:00, 25 February 2022 (UTC)
Alan B Christ
If you see a copyright at the bottom by Scott Banks that is Alan B Christ that is me.. dont know how else to prove it but I had to convert my bmp files to ipg's if that helps any.. could send a page from the second half if that helps.. Alan B Christ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alan B Christ (talk • contribs) 23:45, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
- @Alan B Christ: Hi,
- Please sign with
~~~~
. - As explained in Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Alan B Christ, the copyright holder(s) need to send a formal written permission for a free license. Please see COM:VRT for the procedure. That's the standard procedure for all documents previously published elsewhere. Regards, Yann (talk) 10:24, 25 February 2022 (UTC)
Speedy file unprotection request
Hi, could you unprotect File:2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine please? It seems to have been auto protected by a bot for being in a canvass page and needs to be updated frequently. Thanks. Viewsridge (talk) 06:42, 25 February 2022 (UTC)
- @Viewsridge: Done I removed it from the cascading page. Regards, Yann (talk) 10:21, 25 February 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks! :) Viewsridge (talk) 10:27, 25 February 2022 (UTC)
- Oh it looks like KrinkleBot automatically re-added it :/ Viewsridge (talk) 10:32, 25 February 2022 (UTC)
- Ok no worries though, it has been removed from the French Wiki front page and the bot autoremoved it, thanks :). Viewsridge (talk) 10:48, 25 February 2022 (UTC)
Deletion request
Hi Yann, since you seem to be currently active, could we get revision deletions of recent uploads of File:Flag of Ukraine.png. The graffiti is in English. Feel free to also block the vandal. I've put in a global lock request but it may not be immediate. Thanks. zzuuzz (talk) 14:41, 25 February 2022 (UTC)
- Done Yann (talk) 14:52, 25 February 2022 (UTC)
- Super, thanks. zzuuzz (talk) 14:55, 25 February 2022 (UTC)
⭐ A file you uploaded is on the main page! ⭐
File:Walden 01 thoreau 128kb.mp3, that you uploaded, is on the main page today. Thank you for your contributions to this project. |
//EatchaBot (talk) 00:00, 28 February 2022 (UTC)
⭐ A file you uploaded is on the main page! ⭐
File:The Three Musketeers (1921).webm, that you uploaded, is on the main page today. Thank you for your contributions to this project. |
//EatchaBot (talk) 00:01, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
Bonjour Yann,
D'après ce que je comprends ici, il me semble que pour ce fichier il faudrait l'autorisation du compositeur (Jean-Claude Benedetti, pour la musique) et de l’interprète (Bruno Picard, chanteur), et ce même si Lucyin est l'auteur du texte chanté, non ? Reptilien.19831209BE1 (talk) 14:44, 27 February 2022 (UTC)
- Fait Exact, tagué. Yann (talk) 19:23, 27 February 2022 (UTC)
- D'accord, alors je me dois d'indiquer également ce fichier (Bernard Diez, chanteur). D'autres viendront probablement. Reptilien.19831209BE1 (talk) 21:29, 27 February 2022 (UTC)
- Je suppose qu'il faut également une autorisation de Willy Marchal pour cette vidéo : File:Marchal Willy infôrmatike.webm, même si c'est Lucyin qui a filmé ? Reptilien.19831209BE1 (talk) 06:36, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
- Idem pour File:Poplineau ptit muzicyin.webm, autorisation de Bernard Poplineau ? Reptilien.19831209BE1 (talk) 06:39, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
- Ou encore File:Wa responda Collin ovraedje.webm, autorisation de Lucien Collin ? Reptilien.19831209BE1 (talk) 06:41, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
Cette photo a été prise par Christiane Blanjean, pour illuster son article, sur son blog, sous copyright (voir bas de page). Je pense que pour faire les choses dans les règles il nous faut son accord. N'est-ce pas ? Reptilien.19831209BE1 (talk) 10:40, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
Jerry Schilling
Hi Yann, Schilling is on this picture. Why did you revert the respective category? Best, --NiTenIchiRyu (talk) 12:41, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
- OOPS. Yann (talk) 12:42, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
- Thank you! --NiTenIchiRyu (talk) 12:45, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
⭐ A file you uploaded is on the main page! ⭐
File:Le Bateau ivre, by Arthur Rimbaud neb.mp3, that you uploaded, is on the main page today. Thank you for your contributions to this project. |
//EatchaBot (talk) 00:00, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
Block evasion
Bonjour,
Vous aviez récemment bloqué les faux-nez de Shreejank (talk · contribs). Il est revenu avec le compte Engagevoluntaire18 (talk · contribs).
Pourriez-vous également le bloquer ? --Le Petit Chat (talk) 12:24, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
⭐ A file you uploaded is on the main page! ⭐
File:Boléro de Ravel, Orchestre de l'Association des Concerts Lamoureux, 1935, 1.mp3, that you uploaded, is on the main page today. Thank you for your contributions to this project. |
//EatchaBot (talk) 00:00, 7 March 2022 (UTC)
Demandes d'autorisation ?
Suite à ça, il reste encore à déterminer s'il faut une autorisation pour :
- cette vidéo File:Marchal Willy infôrmatike.webm, la personne filmée par Lucyin est Willy Marchal
- idem pour File:Poplineau ptit muzicyin.webm, la personne filmée est Bernard Poplineau
- ou encore File:Wa responda Collin ovraedje.webm, la personne filmée est Lucien Collin
J'ajoute ces enregistrements audios réalisés par Émile Pècheur sur cassette, numérisés par Lucyin :
- File:Petcheur Mimile ratourneures sol maigreur et l' grandeur.ogg
- File:Petcheur_Mimile_ratourneures_sol_tiesse.ogg
- File:Petcheur_Mimile_ratourneures_so_les_djambes.ogg
Reptilien.19831209BE1 (talk) 07:24, 7 March 2022 (UTC)
Mise à jour de l'image utilisée par le modèle {FRA-d}
Bonjour!
Il semblerait que l'image du drapeau français utilisée pour le modèle {FRA-d} sur Wikipédia (voir image n°1 ci-dessous) ne soit modifiable que pas un administrateur. C'est pourquoi je requiers votre aide. En effet, depuis le changement des couleurs du drapeau français en novembre 2021, ce modèle ne permet pas d'utiliser une version actualisée de l'image. Le seul moyen d'avoir un drapeau proche de l'actuel est donc d'utiliser un autre modèle comme le modèle {drapeau|France} (voir image n°2 ci-dessous), ce qui est fort peu pratique car cela implique de remplacer manuellement le modèle via le code.
Serait-il donc possible de mettre à jour l'image du modèle {FRA-d} ? Ou vaut-il mieux remplacer manuellement le code sur les pages ?
Merci d'avance pour votre réponse,
Gamma Corvi (talk) 23:58, 7 March 2022 (UTC)
⭐ A file you uploaded is on the main page! ⭐
File:Awakening 01 chopin.mp3, that you uploaded, is on the main page today. Thank you for your contributions to this project. |
//EatchaBot (talk) 00:00, 8 March 2022 (UTC)
⭐ A file you uploaded is on the main page! ⭐
File:Salammbo 01 flaubert 128kb.mp3, that you uploaded, is on the main page today. Thank you for your contributions to this project. |
//EatchaBot (talk) 00:00, 12 March 2022 (UTC)
⭐ A file you uploaded is on the main page! ⭐
File:Wutheringheights 01 bronte.mp3, that you uploaded, is on the main page today. Thank you for your contributions to this project. |