User talk:Yann/archives 48

This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

You marked Copyright violations on material we own and it needs to be fixed

Hi Yann,

You recently marked several of the files we uploaded as possible copyright violations. We not only own the copyright, we're the ones who created the images mentioned. If you notice our screen name it is VariLoudRecords. We are the record label for Joe Vitale Jr and we posted this material for others to be able to do articles about Joe Vitale Jr's albums. We need all of these violations removed. We acknowledged when we uploaded the images that we own the material. We do not understand why you removed these images. Please remove the violation tags and correct :

Thank you, Vari Loud Records — Preceding unsigned comment added by VariLoudRecords (talk • contribs) 02:34, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@VariLoudRecords: Hi,

If you own the copyright of these works, you need to send a permission via email, as for all works previously published elsewhere, otherwise they will be deleted. Please see COM:OTRS for the details. Regards, Yann (talk) 10:37, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Loves Food 2021 in India

Hi Yann, Hope you are doing well. I sent you email about the Wiki Loves Food 2021 in India jury. Could you please confirm if you have received the mail or not? Regards--Atudu (talk) 07:09, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:BS Negi GOC.jpg

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:BS Negi GOC.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:BS Negi GOC.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 06:34, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

MOTD Notification

⭐ A file you uploaded is on the main page! ⭐

File:Group leaving church in Bohemia, Czech Republic, 1897.webm, that you uploaded, is on the main page today. Thank you for your contributions to this project.

//EatchaBot (talk) 00:01, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Systematic edit warring, pushing of national supremacy ideas in Wikimedia Commons

Hello, please take a look at report Commons:Administrators' noticeboard#Purposeful edit warring performed by user Kazimier Lachnovič (new incident). This brutal and systematic edit warring must be stopped. Best regards, -- Pofka (talk) 21:16, 30 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Three Friends, by William H. Johnson.jpg

File:Three Friends, by William H. Johnson.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Filetime (talk) 19:46, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Report

Hello, please take a look at this report: Commons:Administrators' noticeboard#Files named with meaningless/disruptive names (motivated renaming was reverted without any valid reason) as these are serious everyday violations of the Commons rules and protection of meaningless names (in this case, Kalumny which translates as Columns). User Kazimier Lachnovič with filemover rights constantly performs violations of the Commons rules, creates instability issues and protects meaningless names, thus creates confusion. His Commons admin rights previously were lifted, but it is clear that it is not enough. -- Pofka (talk) 17:30, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:God's Little Acre, 1958.webm

File:God's Little Acre, 1958.webm has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Lewschoen (talk) 12:38, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

We need your feedback!

Hello. Apologies if this message is not in your native language: please feel free to respond in the language of your choice. Thank you!

I am writing to you because we are looking for feedback for a new Wikimedia Foundation project, Structured Data Across Wikimedia (SDAW). SDAW is a grant-funded programme that will explore ways to structure content on wikitext pages in a way that will be machine-recognizable and -relatable, in order to make reading, editing, and searching easier and more accessible across projects and on the Internet. We are now focusing on designing and building image suggestion features for experienced users.

We have some questions to ask you about your experience with uploading images here on Wikimedia Commons and then adding them to Wikipedia. You can answer these questions on a specific feedback page on Mediawiki, where we will gather feedback. As I said, these questions are in English, but your answers do not need to be in English! You can also answer in your own language, if you feel more comfortable.

Once the collecting of feedback will be over, we will sum it up and share with you a summary, along with updated mocks that will incorporate your inputs.

Also, if you want to keep in touch with us or you want to know more about the project, you can subscribe to our newsletter.

Hope to hear from you soon! -- Sannita (WMF) (talk to me!) 09:56, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

MOTD Notification

⭐ A file you uploaded is on the main page! ⭐

File:La Libération de Paris, 1944.ogv, that you uploaded, is on the main page today. Thank you for your contributions to this project.

//EatchaBot (talk) 00:00, 15 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:Abu Dhabi Police F999.jpg

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Abu Dhabi Police F999.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Abu Dhabi Police F999.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

廣九直通車 (talk) 08:34, 16 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It's Wiki Loves Monuments time again!

Welcome to

Wiki Loves Monuments 2021
India

Hello Yann/archives 48!

We are excited again to let you know that, Wiki Loves Monuments, the largest photography competition of the world, will take place for the 12th time this year. And guess what! India is going to participate in the event again this year from September 1 to September 30, 2021. You might remember this competition as you had participated in one of its previous editions. We would be very delighted to see you take part in the competition again, help record and digitally document our monuments for future generations and get a chance to win exciting prizes! You can find more details about the Indian part of the competition in this page. See you in action in few hours!!

Regards,
Bodhisattwa
(on behalf of Wiki Loves Monuments 2021 in India team)
Sent through MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:17, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Fichier Xavier Galmiche

Bonjour Yann, je ne comprends pas pourquoi le fichier de l'infobox Xavier Galmiche a été remplacé sans discussion préalable et pourquoi je n'ai pas reçu de mail prévenant de la modif en étant un contributeur de cet article. Merci d'avance et bonne journée.--Amage9 (talk) 11:15, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Bulletin of the British Ornithologists' Club (IA bulletinofbritis10410brit).pdf

This is not a US work. It's a British publication, The UK has never had a notice requirement.ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 17:56, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Also: -

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Bulletin of the British Ornithologists' Club (IA bulletinofbritis10319brit).pdf
Commons:Deletion requests/File:Proceedings of the International Ornithological Congress (IA proceedingsofint91938inte).pdf Not a US work, Published in Australia.
Commons:Deletion requests/File:Proceedings of the International Ornithological Congress (IA proceeding13119621963inte).pdf Not a US work, Published in Australia.

However, Thank you for nudge about checking for notices, Subsequent to the mass DR's I had been adding a tracking category, for US works that needed checking for notice, renewals, rather than filing DR's ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 18:05, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, The last 2 are OK. I changed the license. Regards, Yann (talk) 20:44, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Museu Carmen Thyssen Andorra

merci, j'ai demandé la supression des ses fichers depuis longtemps. en effet je ne suis rendu compte de la date de deces de l'auteur apres coup. a+ bye --Chatsam (talk) 15:20, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

N1TH Music

Yes I understand your warning but I don't understand how copyright violations work, it says when you upload a photo that you either need permission from the owner or need it to be your own photo, so I took a photo from what I thought (and still think) is a copyright free site, but now it appears some of the photos I uploaded aren't so I guess I have to be more careful, but I do not know how to find out whether something is copyrighted or not, and when you upload a photo although it says something about getting permission from someone else to upload their photo it still forces you to check the box saying that it's your own work, are there proper guidelines to proper use because I want to continue using wikipedia and wikicommons and I don't want to get blocked. Apologies for the issues, N1TH Music — Preceding unsigned comment added by N1TH Music (talk • contribs) 04:38, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@N1TH Music: Basically, everything is copyrighted by default nowadays, except a few exceptions : US government works, very simple drawings (a square, a circle...), etc. If you are not sure, ask on Commons:Village pump/Copyright‎. Regards, Yann (talk) 20:31, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:A banner-flag of Ishikawa Kasumi.jpg

Hi, Yann. You reverted my edit in this file. Why reverted? This flag contains a likeness illustration of en:Kasumi Ishikawa, an active table tennis player. The author of the art may be still alive and copyright is valid now. According to COM:FOP Japan, the author should give the free licenses on the art to keep in commons. But that file doesn't contain the author and license information, so I added that tag to ask the uploader for adding information. Please re-consider the appropriate handling of this file. Regards. --Netora (talk) 09:07, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Netora: Hi, OK, but the issue is not the source, but the potential permission about this illustration. Author and license are mentioned for the photograph, so only the depicted subject is the issue. This may require a proper deletion request, and not simply a tag. Regards, Yann (talk) 20:36, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Edit-conflict on Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Markuss86

Thanks for working on the ones I listed. I had tagged a bunch more but had not yet put them in the list on the DR page (just a note that "This is partial list")...all of Special:ListFiles/Markuss86. Should I file a new DR for the rest? I have some specific info for at least some that you rightly thought might be too simple for protection, but once the bulk of the obvious ones are done, it will be easier to discuss those. DMacks (talk) 17:08, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@DMacks: I kept some which are {{PD-textlogo}}. Regards, Yann (talk) 17:13, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

How about File:VC Zenit Saint Petersburg.jpg, File:PGNiG Superliga.jpg, and the others on which you neither deleted nor marked as /kept/? DMacks (talk) 17:24, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@DMacks: I deleted the second. I am not sure about the first one. The ball is a fairly simple design. It probably depends on the country.

I'll check, and open a new DR with info and to discuss depending what I find. DMacks (talk) 17:32, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:V Admiral Imran pic.jpg

Hi Yann. Would you mind taking a look at File:V Admiral Imran pic.jpg? It seems to be the same file as File:VAdm Imran pic.jpg that you deleted a few days ago. Moreover, there's nothing on the source website given for the file that shows it's been released as licensed. -- Marchjuly (talk) 13:04, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pakistan governement works are not in the public domain. Deleted. Thanks for your help, Yann (talk) 17:49, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

POV pseudohistorians - mass delete

Dear Yann,

Thank you for acting on my inept Commons:Deletion requests/File:Nauku Czytania i Rozumienia Pisma Slonsko Slowenskogo Gotow.pdf

I am not sure what to do with the same problem with Category talk:Silezki Apostol, File:Wyznanie Klemensa1.jpg, as it may be massive; see admins' and my notes in Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems#Apparent sockpuppet spreading cross-wiki hoaxes

Do ping me please once you decide, as I am interested in such THETRUTH meta missionaries. (Pacem Poe's Law and the principle of parsimony, I assume they believe in it.) Zezen (talk) 09:38, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Zezen: Hi, I have seen this thread. I don't have the time to review all the concerned uploads, but I can delete the files once proper DRs are done. Regards, Yann (talk) 08:27, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Caged (2020 film)

Apologies for the sloppy error. From the guidance on non-free posters it seems I should have used that template in the licensing section. If I do so, and use a png I've now downloaded from the distributor's site is it ok for me to add the image? Thank you for your patience. User:Latechild — Preceding unsigned comment added by Latechild (talk • contribs) 13:24, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Latechild: Hi, On Commons, only files with a free license or in the public domain are allowed. Fair use images should be uploaded locally on Wikipedia when that is allowed. See en:WP:FU for the English Wikipedia. Regards, Yann (talk) 14:20, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright Problem

Hello Yann, Please stop copyrighting my work. My pictures are in the public domain while you keep copyright striking me for no reason. West Highway you copyrighted me for was in the public domain. The image owner has not came out as I was researching and couldn't find him. Please stop sending me copyright claims for no reason while I have permission? Thank you? — Preceding unsigned comment added by UpperSeattle (talk • contribs) 00:43, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@UpperSeattle: Hi, It is your responsibility to add a license which fit the copyright status of your files. You must add valid source and author. Until you do that, your files will be considered suspicious, and will be deleted. You can ask COM:VPC if you need more help to determine their copyright status. You are certainly not allowed to upload files not authored by you without a formal permission from the copyright holder. Regards, Yann (talk) 07:58, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your deletion

Hi. Why did you delete my photograph: File:Cardiff street today - Prince Charles - Wales Doesn't Need a Prince.jpg? I took that one myself (and 5 others), and find it odd that you can question this, after uploading so many photographs. Are you a staunch Royalist? This is rather odd. John Jones (talk) 19:07, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@John Jones: Hi,

First drop personal attacks, or you might be blocked.

That poster is under a copyright, and your picture is a derivative work. Freedom of panorama in UK doesn't include 2D works, so you are not allowed to upload such a picture on Commons. Regards, Yann (talk) 20:40, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Images of Joav BarEl

Hello Yann, I'm writing about the images I've uploaded on September 13th, some of which you've deleted and some flagged. I'm new here so I understand I probably made mistakes in how I listed them, but in my understanding, they are all free to use:

File:Joav BarEl.jpg - the photographer of this image is unknown, but it is a private image the BarEl family kept and was published a few times in museum publications as a part of the family archive. We have no knowledge of other rights owners of it.

File:Joav_BarEl_on_the_beach_in_Tel-Aviv,_Israel.jpg - this too is a private family image with no known rights owners.

The BarEl family authorized the publishing of those images in Wikipedia.

the following images: File:JoavBarEl, Kennedy's Assassination.jpg (deleted) File:Joav BarEl, Center of the World.jpg (deleted) File:Joav BarEl, A Common Confusion at the Stairs.jpg File:Joav BarEl, Landscape.jpg

are all Joav's works, that were reproduced by the photographer Yair Meyuhas who was commissioned by the Mevo'ot Fund. They hold the rights to those images and they allow their publication on Wikipedia.

This image: File:Joav BarEl and Yitzhak Danziger.jpg was photographed by Drora Spitz. She waived her rights to the Mevo'ot Fund, and they authorized the publication of the image.

I'm unsure about what I need to do now in order to settle the status of the images' display, and I will appreciate your help with that matter. Please let us know how I can proceed from here.

Many Thanks Mika Nachtailer — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nachtailer (talk • contribs) 12:06, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Nachtailer: Hi,

File:Joav BarEl on the beach in Tel-Aviv, Israel.jpg is most probably {{PD-Israel}}. File:Joav BarEl.jpg could also be {{PD-Israel}}, but we need more information. Are you really sure that the photographer is unknown? What's the exact date of creation and/or first publication?

For the other images, the copyright holder(s) must send a permission via COM:VRT. Regards, Yann (talk) 12:30, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Yann:

Hi Yann, thank you. Yes we are sure the photographers are unknown. File:Joav BarEl.jpg was published a few times over the years by the Tel-Aviv Museum of Art (starting 2004, to my best knowledge) as such, and we couldn't trace any information that will declare otherwise. File:Joav BarEl on the beach in Tel-Aviv, Israel.jpg is from the 1930's. It was found at the family archive and was first publish on the Mevo'ot Fund website with a permission from the family. regarding the other images, the copyrights holder would like to send the email via COM:VRT - can we undelete the images so she could include their URLs in the mail? many thanks, Mika — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nachtailer (talk • contribs) 12:14, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Nachtailer: Hi,

Just send the permission with the file names, they will be undeleted when the permission is accepted. Regards, Yann (talk) 13:46, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of File:S East Geology.jpg

Hi! Can I ask what the copyright problem was with File:S East Geology.jpg? I nominated it myself back in July, and then un-nominated it when the public domain source was properly identified. I seem to recall that there were some lingering issues with how it was credited (something about being a derivative of another image, long since deleted?), but unfortunately I can't see the details any more, now that it's been deleted. Thanks! -- Perey (talk) 03:11, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Perey: Hi, Can you please add the source, the date, and the author, as well as for File:Geological map of Great Britain.jpg? Thanks, Yann (talk) 08:28, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for restoring those—I never got to see the older one until now! As it says at the bottom, the source is Stanford's Geological Atlas, and the map itself is by Horace B. Woodward. Stanford published many volumes with very similar maps: Example 1 (nearly identical), Example 2, Example 3.

There are two difficulties, though:

Now that I see it, the full map is in fact a file taken from the website of Dr Ian West. (That's what I thought had happened, back in July, and is why I made the deletion nomination then.) Note I say the file, not the map. Though Dr West puts his name at the bottom and says it's "after" Woodward's map, I can't for the life of me see what's different.^[a] But there could be some of Dr West's original work in this particular file, it could be a copyvio, and so we really ought to replace it with an authentic copy of an original.
Finding a good-quality original is difficult. The one copy that the Internet Archive has of Stanford's Geological Atlas] is missing this precise map, the frontispiece according to the contents. Their other Stanford volumes have similar but older maps. Google Image Search turns up various blurry copies, plus some good ones... that credit Dr West. And frankly, Dr West's is a very nicely cleaned-up copy.

So. The map itself is by Horace B. Woodward and is PD-old, but this specific copy was prepared by Dr Ian West, and may possibly have some copyrightable work of his own in it. I really don't know what to do here! -- Perey (talk) 14:58, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

↑ Okay, I can find ten differences, all of which could be down to editing errors or using a slightly different edition—none look like original creative work on Dr West's part.

@Perey: I created a Creator template, a category for the author, and updated the license. I also uploaded File:Geological map of Great Britain, 1878.jpg, an older but bigger version of the same map. You may want to update your crop from this file, or you could use a crop of File:Geological Survey Map of Great Britain, Sheet 2 South.jpg (use the CropTool), a much bigger and more recent map. Everything seems to be in order now. Regards, Yann (talk) 18:37, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:TJslezanopava logo.jpg

Is there any instructions on how to do this? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Veny213 (talk • contribs) 15:56, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Veny213: Hi,

The copyright holder must send a permission for a free license. Please see COM:VRT for the details. Regards, Yann (talk) 16:19, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You delete Wikimedia commons

Hi, you let delete WikimediaCommons I uploadet. You wrote there was a copyright violation: I, as U-Boot37, was the creator of the original artworks, and I manage the profiles of the band and I'm fully authorized to pubblish. Before removing, you could ask User:GreenArrowsHC — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 151.95.102.194 (talk) 19:38, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If the original publication was on another website I would advise you to read COM:VRT. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 22:52, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Target Australia logos

Hi Yann. I was just seeking a bit more clarification as to your closing message on Commons:Deletion requests/File:Target Logo.svg ("No valid reason for deletion. PD-textlogo").

As I explained thoroughly in the discussion, the threshold of originality and existing common law in Australia gives no merit to plain text public domain claims. The two images in question, File:Sign-for-Target-Myer-Centre.jpg and File:Target Logo.svg, are both Australian in origin, exceed the threshold of originality (the Aboriginal Australian flag, which is three horizontal triangles, was found to be copyrightable in court, for reference), and no identified court case has ever upheld the logic behind {{PD-textlogo}}. Per COM:EVID, the keep argument did not provide any reasonable evidence to support a number of their claims, and the evidence provided by the delete argument rather conclusively showed there was no relationship between en:Target Corporation and en:Target Australia, which was the principle keep argument. All of this together, even with what I feel is a rather clear cut case for deletion, I feel as though COM:PCP should have been rather clearly invoked given the significant evidence and disagreement.

I also feel as through your closing message did not give, what I would consider, adequate explanation or justification for your decision. I find this especially given that there were several significant arguments involved, and that your conclusion was opposite to that of the majority of respondents (there was only one user who objected to deleting, versus three supporting deletion).

I hope that I've made myself clear, and that you'll be able to provide a bit more of a justification and explanation on how you came to your conclusion :) ItsPugle (talk) 10:05, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@ItsPugle: Hi, I honestly think that the current interpretation of Australian law on this matter is a complete nonsense. In this case, there are different opinions about the acceptability of this logo for Commons, so I have chosen what we should always do, i.e. the most favorable position for Commons. Regards, Yann (talk) 10:55, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for getting back to me. Would you be able to elaborate a bit more on how the current understanding of Australian law is "complete nonsense"? The only opinion against deleting it is based around a supposed connection between the United States and Australian companies, but both companies have stated they are not related, which I think nullifies any weight to this. I'm also a little concerned about your last sentence though as that directly goes against the precautionary principle. ItsPugle (talk) 08:05, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Yann. Just wondering if you'd be able to reply to the message I left you over a fortnight ago, on the 12th? ItsPugle (talk) 10:48, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright on Columbia Pool Image

Pardon my ignorance but I wasn't sure how to deal with copyright on this. The file is in the public archives of the City of Portland. It is public record and is therefore free to reproduce. It was made in 1973 and published without copyright therefore it should be "in the public domain due to failure to comply with required formalities" per https://copyright.cornell.edu/publicdomain. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 12quality (talk • contribs) 21:15, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@12quality: If you know where and when it was first published, we can decide which license fit this file: maybe {{PD-USGov}} or {{PD-US no notice}} or {{PD-US-no renewal}}. Regards, Yann (talk) 07:53, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Yann: Ok, great. how do I do that? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 12quality (talk • contribs) 19:34, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@12quality: Just edit the file description page. Please add all the details about publication, etc. Regards, Yann (talk) 19:44, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Consultation about deletion of the logo of the baseball team Toros de Herrera de Panamá

Greetings friend Yann I have received notification that the logo of the Panama Toros de Herrera Baseball team has been deleted, which has been placed with the intention of collaboration so that it can be incorporated into this information system. Briefly I explain: In the information on the Professional Baseball League of Panama. The teams that belong to this league appear, which are made up of: Metropolitan Eagles, Astronauts from Los Santos, Federals from Chiriquí and Toros de Herrera, These baseball teams have no information on Wikipedia.

My idea is to provide the information about them within Wikipedida, so that in the Information Sheets, their logo and all the relevant information that we wish to contribute appears.

The Toros de Herrera Team was champion of the Caribbean Series of the year 2019, as you can verify.

So my interest is to fill in the relevant data of the team in said information including its Logo, which the organization has allowed me to incorporate in the Wikimedia Commos with the rights released.

I appreciate very much the one that allows to release this logo, to be able to complete the information of the team. In addition, I would appreciate any advice or help that you provide me, which will be greatly appreciated.

I also send you some information so you can verify, Eliasg0974 --Eliasg0974 (talk) 01:42, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Eliasg0974: Hi,

To publish such a file on Commons, you need the written permission from the copyright holder. If you have such a permission, please see COM:VRT for the procedure. Regards, Yann (talk) 19:14, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/File:개자지.jpg

Sir, I don't understand why you would delete this file. It was in use on a Wikipedia. Pack My Box (talk) 03:14, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Pack My Box: See COM:PENIS. Yann (talk) 19:15, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Yann: See COM:INUSE. Pack My Box (talk) 19:22, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Pack My Box: Deletion was also requested by the uploader. Regards, Yann (talk) 19:25, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

At Commons:Deletion requests/File talk:불알.jpg the same user requested their file be deleted but you closed it as "keep". This is very inconsistent. Please restore the file that was in use on another wiki. Thank you. Pack My Box (talk) 19:36, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Pack My Box: OK, I think I mixed up the DRs. I restored the file. Sorry for the inconvenience. Regards, Yann (talk) 19:41, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted content

Hello Yann, I am new on wiki commons and I am writing you to seek your help regarding the following files that have been reported for delation and/or deleted.

All files are books or magazine covers. Yorgo&Co studio for whom I work authorised me to release the image work under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0. The images are already published on the company website www.yorgo.co. (I only cropped them in some cases). I wish to upload other files and hope you could help me to avoid mistakes. Should I fill a VRT for each image ? Thank you for your time and help. --Qhfofi (talk) 09:41, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Qhfofi: Hi,

On Wikimedia Commons, all files can be used for any purpose, including commercial ones, therefore non-commercial licenses are not allowed. Please see COM:L for more details. Regards, Yann (talk) 19:18, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:ThomasFan707

This user seems to be a sockpuppet of "User:WikiLoverFan1007", perhaps it would be wise to go over their deletion requests as they (generally) seem to be of the same type of vandalism. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 22:54, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Done All reverted. This vandalism should have been prevented by CU doing proper duty. :( Yann (talk) 21:15, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by ImmaDie

Hi Yann, do you care to elaborate your closure with a keep despite the blatant copyvios of a serial uploader of copyvios? Please have a look at meta:Talk:Wikiproject:Antispam#CharmenderDeol for context. Regards, AFBorchert (talk) 06:18, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@AFBorchert: Oops, it seems I closed this DR a bit too fast. I deleted all files. Thanks for your help, Yann (talk) 16:05, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Great, thank you! --AFBorchert (talk) 17:00, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ghandi's son in New York

Hello, please see c:File:Ghandi's zoon in New York, Bestanddeelnr 901-7744.jpg. The caption in Dutch reads: "Ghandi's son in New York." Since I assume you are better informed than me on the topic of the Ghandi family, and since Mahatma had more than one son: do you know which son we are looking at? Best regards, Jeff5102 (talk) 09:26, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Jeff5102: Hi,

I doubt he is one of Mahatma Gandhi's sons. en:Harilal Gandhi vaguely looks like the man in the picture, but I don't think he went to USA, or any of his brothers. He could be one of his grandson (en:Kanu Gandhi (scientist), en:Arun Manilal Gandhi), but none match the age and date of this picture (with a spelling error). So either the date is wrong, or he is another person. Regards, Yann (talk) 19:24, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:I Wish to Say.jpg and File:Oring Headshot.jpg

Hey, this is mostly my fault as I forgot to add a license when handling the ticket. But in the future, any file with a VRT confirmation but no license should be referred to COM:ON for verification of its status rather than being deleted. Cheers, King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 22:57, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User_talk:Fæ/IA_books

Most of the DR's you nudged me about were in relation to this project.

Fæ hasn't edited for a few days, and just before they ceased editing, I'd posted on VP (now removed), saying that the project really ought to be in Commons namespace, and that the support of other contributors was needed.

I'm not sure how to proceed, as amongst the nearly 1.5 million works uploaded, there will inevtiably be some that Commons cannot host, due in part to errors and omissions in the IA metadata used to assist the bulk uploading project. There are also happily as you mentioned many where a simple licence update will resolve the issue. Thanks to the efforts of other contributors some of the DR's are in this situation.

Would you please have word with your fellow admins about how to migrate the 'project' page to Commons namespace, and develop an appropriate process to review the uploads made by it?? A CCI would not be the appropriate process, as there's clearly not been bad faith on the part of the contributors undertaking it.

Fæ had previously posted about this project to Village Pump, but given the sheer level of contributions made to Commons, this may not necessarily have been noted by contributors able to assist in reviewing. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 21:56, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Fæ: Hi, ShakespeareFan00 has suggested to move this project to Commons namespace. Are you OK with that? Regards, Yann (talk) 09:18, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Yann: - Fæ seems to have left Commons, so I would suggest the issue of discussing "elevation" of this project with other admins, with a view to finding someone to 'adopt' it as a temporary measure. ShakespeareFan00 (talk)

@ShakespeareFan00: Hi, I won't move Fæ's page unless there is a consensus to do that. So you should open a discussion on COM:VP. Regards, Yann (talk) 08:30, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@ShakespeareFan00:

Done I moved the page. Regards, Yann (talk) 20:26, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Contested undeletion

I see you have restored the hoax image File:AflagforIraq.svg. What is the appropriate forum for requesting its redeletion? GPinkerton (talk) 18:20, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have a doubt

Hi, again! Many images from the Banknotes of Brazilian real category have problems. For example: File:50 Brazil real Second Obverse.jpg.

The description has {{Own}}, which is not true. The author is the Central Bank of Brazil.
Consequently the images are not in CC BY-SA 4.0 ({{Cc-by-sa-4.0}}). All these images should have {{Money-BR}}.

But there's another problem. The template says:

All images must contain the expression "SEM VALOR" placed on the picture diagonally

Edu! (talk) 19:00, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Edu!: Hi,

1. You can change the license with COM:VFC.

2. This is not a copyright issue, so we don't care. Regards, Yann (talk) 19:07, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Binnein2018.jpg

I noticed you deleted the image I uploaded, but you made a mistake on your part because it has the license to where the image can be uploaded onto here. I guess you didn't check for the Creative Commons icon to where the image was originally uploaded. Btspurplegalaxy (talk) 16:40, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Bonsoir Yann, there is in fact a tiny CC icon with a link to the licence on the right side below the last image here. See also COM:WHERE#Tistory. De728631 (talk) 17:06, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Done @Btspurplegalaxy: Could you please add categories? Thanks, Yann (talk) 17:12, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You deleted pictures that I took

Good day In a file deletion on September 11, 3 uploaded images that I had obtained from the internet and uploaded to 3 articles were deleted. I understand the reasons and accept the policies of Wikimedia Commons

That same day 8 photographs that I myself took and uploaded were deleted, of which I don't understand why they were deleted if I have all the rights and they were even uploaded to wikimedia rather than to a website.

I wait for an answer — Preceding unsigned comment added by Garlock1 (talk • contribs) 19:41, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Garlock1: Hi,

I deleted your pictures because they are copyright violations, or appear to be so. Either upload the original pictures with full EXIF data if they are yours, or the copyright holder has to send a permission via COM:VRT. Additionally it could help if you give the file names, so I could look more closely, and give you a detailed answer. Regards, Yann (talk) 19:33, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Garlock1: Is your name Guillermo De Avila? I found it in the EXIF metadata of some of your files. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 17:35, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@King of Hearts: :@Yann: Hi

No, no, my name is Cristhian García, I work in the same institution as Guillermo de Avila, who is in charge of the Photography department, so the teams are under her name.

I make a list of the files and attach details of the photographs, to verify that I have the rights to upload them.

File: Plaza San Juan Bautista La Salle Laguna.jpg

Authors: Guillermo de Avila Capture date: 02/26/2014 1:36 pm Copyright: Servicios Fotográficos Camera Model: Canon EOS 60D

File: La Salle Laguna University Facade.jpg

Authors: Guillermo de Avila Capture date: 01/23/2017 09:28 am Copyright: Servicios Fotográficos Camera Model: Canon EOS 60D

File: La salle university facade at night.jpg

Authors: Guillermo de Avila Capture date: 04/05/2017 07:17 am Copyright: Servicios Fotográficos Camera Model: Canon EOS 60D

For the archives of Antonio Attolini Murra we made a contract with Melchor Cadena who facilitated his studio and his team to take the photographs, I insist, of which we have all the rights.

The only infractions to the rules were applied from September 11 to the date, in which I tried to post photos that were on the internet but did not check their licenses.

I would appreciate the reestablishment of the previous photographs that if they had everything in order. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Garlock1 (talk • contribs) 19:14, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Garlock1: Hi,

Please sign with ~~~~.

As for any document for which you are not the personal copyright holder, for the files to be undeleted, the legal representative of the institution has to send a permission via COM:VRT. Regards, Yann (talk) 19:31, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Yann

I have contacted the physical authors of the works and they have sent the following emails authorizing the use of the images on Wikipedia.

Attached the ticket numbers:

[Ticket#2021120910008601]

[Ticket#2021120910008584]

[Ticket#2021120910008815]

[Ticket#2021120910008824]

[Ticket#2021120910008861]

[Ticket#2021120910008879]

[Ticket#2021120910008888]

Garlock1 (talk) 17:19, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your deletions and comments on my discussion page

Hello Yann, the w:Mathematical Research Institute of Oberwolfach states [https:opc.mfo.de]] here, that the lowres pictures on their website marked with copyright MFO may be used under the terms of Attribution-Share Alike 2.0 Germany. This applies to the deleted files

File:Karl-August Keil MFO 1981.jpg,
File:Inge und Karl-August Keil MFO 1981.jpg
as well as to File:Bodo Pareigis.jpg. As to File:Günther Hämmerlin.jpg, which is not marked with copyright MFO, MFO OPC has answered my request to use this file by mail on March 4 2020 with the following:

Sehr geehrter Herr Wenninger,

Herr Fischer hat die Erlaubnis zur Nutzung der kleinen Auflösung gegeben (s.u.).

Mit freundlichen Grüßen Jennifer Hinneburg

--- Jennifer Hinneburg Mathematisches Forschungsinstitut Oberwolfach Schwarzwaldstr. 9-11 77709 Oberwolfach

photos@mfo.de opc.mfo.de

Am 04.03.2020 um 12:02 schrieb Gerd Fischer:
> Liebe Frau Hinneburg:
>
> Natürlich bin ich einverstanden, aber nach den üblichen Regeln sollte die Quelle des Bildes genannt werden!
>
> Beste Grüße
>
> Gerd Fischer
>
> Am 04.03.2020 um 11:40 schrieb Oberwolfach Photo Collection (Jennifer Hinneburg):
>> Lieber Herr Fischer,
>>
>> wir haben eine Fotoanfrage zu folgendem Bild von Ihnen:
>>
>> https://opc.mfo.de/detail?photo_id=19755
>>
>> Herr Wenninger möchte das Foto gerne für einen Wikipedia Artikel über Prof. Hämmerlin verwenden. Da laut unseren Aufzeichnungen die Weitergabeberechtigung für dieses Foto beim MFO liegt, habe ich das Bild in kleiner Auflösung weitergegeben. Nun ist sich Herr Wenninger unsicher darüber, ob er das Foto verwenden kann und möchte gerne auch Ihre Zustimmung.
>>
>> Erlauben Sie die Herausgabe des Bildes?
>>
>> Vielen Dank und Grüße
>> Jennifer Hinneburg
>> ---
>> Jennifer Hinneburg
>> Mathematisches Forschungsinstitut Oberwolfach
>> Schwarzwaldstr. 9-11
>> 77709 Oberwolfach
>>
>> photos@mfo.de
>> opc.mfo.de

If this shouldn't suffice, please go ahead and delete the files, you have not already deleted. --Boobarkee (talk) 10:43, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Boobarkee: Hi,

I didn't see the page where it is stated that these images are under a free license. I have undeleted and license reviewed them. This should be done for every images from an external website with such a permission. And sorry, I don't speak German. For the last 2 images, I am not sure what to do. Could you please ask on COM:VPC confirmation that they are OK? Regards, Yann (talk) 14:01, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The uploaded files refer to "MFO Copyright" as do the web-pages, which are stated to be the source. Shouldn't you have double checked before you pressed the delete button? The file File:Bodo Pareigis.jpg is MFO Copyright as well. Could you please make sure, that it will not be deleted? The Mail in German states, that MFO has requested permission form the author, Prof. Dr. Gerd Fischer, which the latter has granted. Please make sure, that this will not deleted as well! Regards, --Boobarkee (talk) 14:19, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Done Sorry for the deletions, but small images from external sources are in most cases copyright violations. We delete thousands of them daily. Regards, Yann (talk) 14:24, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Skeleton exam

The skeleton contains a skull at the top. --The completion of the body (talk) 03:26, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@The completion of the body: Hi, Could you explain what you are talking about? Regards, Yann (talk) 07:28, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Why was sakurai photo removed

It was public domain. Was it not in Japan? Aalji (talk) 01:44, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Aalji: Hi,

I suppose you are taking about File:MasahiroSakurai.png. This is not your own work, therefore you are not allowed to upload it here without a written permission from the copyright holder. Regards, Yann (talk) 07:27, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, so if it's public domain I still have to ask permission? Aalji (talk) 11:38, 6 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Aalji: Well, this image is not in the public domain. Regards, Yann (talk) 12:39, 6 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ok thanks. The smash bros wiki lied I guess Aalji (talk) 19:35, 6 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AzMarie Livingston

Bonjour Yann ! Ravie de te revoir par ici. Merci pour la suppression. Pourrais-tu regarder si je suis dans les clous pour ceci

Je ne suis aps trop sûre :

. Merci !! Nattes à chat (talk) 12:26, 7 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Nattes à chat: Bonjour ! Comment vas-tu ?

As-tu utilisé plusieurs images pour dessiner ce portrait ? Cordialement, Yann (talk) 18:04, 7 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ça va. je me suis inspirée de https://i.pinimg.com/originals/d9/8b/8f/d98b8f49981b96dce4befa91afc5677f.jpg, https://i.pinimg.com/736x/56/d9/15/56d915180951c361b86982566135f414--azmarie-livingston-andro.jpg et https://vignette2.wikia.nocookie.net/americasnexttopmodel/images/4/48/Azmarie-livingston.jpg/revision/latest/scale-to-width-down/250?cb=20150124202753

Bises, Nattes à chat (talk) 09:12, 8 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pour les images suivantes je vais prendre des captures still pour éviter les mêmes soucis. Dis moi si c'est ok ou pas selon toi, sinon supprime la photo. Nattes à chat (talk) 09:14, 8 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Nattes à chat: Je pense que c'est bon. Ton dessin n'est pas une reproduction d'une photo en particulier. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 21:11, 8 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Cake Logo Claim thing

hey, umm so about the logo from the cake series from FXX, well is just that i'm new to editing wiki n' stuff, but i just found it white on https://www.themoviedb.org/tv/93035-cake/images/logos?image_language=en ,Then Edited it black and thats it, don't know much about logos from series having copyright though, thanks 21:17, 7 October 2021

The 3D and backlight effect seems too complex to upload this logo without a permission from the copyright holder. Regards, Yann (talk) 21:20, 7 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

So i add the 3D Purple One? (still waiting for a answer or something). — Preceding unsigned comment added by SomeOtherDud (talk • contribs) 21:27, 8 October 2021 (UTC) (UTC)[reply]

@SomeOtherDud: No, you are not allowed to upload this file without a written permission from the copyright holder. Please sign your messages. Regards, Yann (talk) 21:27, 8 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

i don't have any relation with FXX, again this is new to me, SomeOtherDud|22:31, 8 October 2021 (UTC)}} — Preceding unsigned comment added by SomeOtherDud (talk • contribs) 22:31, 8 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Photo of Rita C. Richey courtesy of Wayne State University web page.jpg

Good evening, Yann: I emailed Dr. Rita C. Richey and she says I am free to use the picture since it is just a shot that her husband had taken of her and it has no copyright.

How should I proceed from here? I anticipate your speedy reply.

Thanks in advance. Andrea — Preceding unsigned comment added by Andrea Peart (talk • contribs) 22:06, 7 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Andrea Peart: Please follow the procedure at COM:VRT. Regards, Yann (talk) 16:15, 8 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:'Maji Maji Rebellion memorial', Kilwa Kivinje.jpg.

Thank you for the copyright message. I did email the person who is the author of the image and he gave permission for it to be used with the correct attribution to him, as I have done in uploading the image, viz;

"You are welcome to use my photos for instructive purposes described in your email below, thank you for asking. I strongly believe teaching history is important and support your efforts. I have put up many photos that you may have already seen. The link is shown below. Steve Steve Hallgren, RPCV Tanzania 2017-2019 Morocco 1972-1974 https://hellofrompeacecorpstanzania.wordpress.com/"

I have emailed him once again about this, but there isn't much else I can do. Ad scribendum (talk) 09:07, 8 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Ad scribendum: Please follow the procedure at COM:VRT. Regards, Yann (talk) 21:28, 8 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AN

Please see: Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard#Deleted_fantasy_flags_restored_by_Yann regarding your recent undeletions. GPinkerton (talk) 18:41, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ordnungspolizei-impfpass, bitte

Hi!

May I ask why is that removed??? [1]

we all have right to mock and ridicule every policy of every government.[2]

This is just a pure censorship under the excuse of political correctness! --Quahadi Añtó 12:31, 10 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong deletion reason

Hi. No big deal but I noticed you put the wrong deletion reason ("https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Administrators%27_noticeboard#Speedy_some_temporarily_undeleted_/_incompletely_redeleted_files") on File:Microsoft Sans Serif font.png which I tagged because File:Microsoft Sans Serif font.svg is the same content but a superior format and neither are copyrightable. DemonDays64 (talk) 18:12, 10 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Tacli-begum 892894.jpg

You closed Commons:Deletion requests/File:Tacli-begum 892894.jpg and deleted File:Tacli-begum 892894.jpg. However you have not deleted File:Taclı Bəyim.jpg, which I had added to the nomination. This file is of the same original image and was uploaded by the same uploader. Was this a mistake? Should I raise a new deletion request for this? Verbcatcher (talk) 00:57, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Done @Verbcatcher: Thanks for the notice. Yann (talk) 08:40, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Selfie

If File:Tommyheisz.jpg is a selfie, why would the uploader write that the photographer is Lene Vendelbo? TherasTaneel (talk) 13:23, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@TherasTaneel: I didn't see the article. Deleted. Yann (talk) 13:26, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, I see :) TherasTaneel (talk) 13:27, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed images for deletion

These images are taken more than 3 decades ago (it is obvious in some cases) and all of them taken in my country. If ANYBODY says (writes) that any of them has any copyright problem, please let me now. Γεώργιος Τερζής 2 (talk) 21:02, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Γεώργιος Τερζής 2: As I already said, it doesn't work that way. YOU have to prove that the images are in the public domain with all proper information: source, date and place of first publication, author, etc. Yann (talk) 21:04, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

OK, shall I put the information needed in the description of the images? Γεώργιος Τερζής 2 (talk) 10:38, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have added information on this image : File:Nikos Galis DSC 0136~2.jpg I don't know if this is enough. Have in mind that all my images are part of the whole image. That's why I wrote that this is my own work. According to the Greek laws (as my lawyer said) this is a public domain. Thank you, waiting for your answer. Γεώργιος Τερζής 2 (talk) 13:20, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Γεώργιος Τερζής 2: Here are the copyright rules for Greece: Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Greece. In short, copyright lasts for 70 years after the author death. This image being from 1987, it is obviously not in the public domain. You need the formal written permission from the photographer to upload it here. Regards, Yann (talk) 21:21, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the copyright rules in Greece. I didn't know that exist in wikipedia. Simple question: The first photographer is unknown. How can I take something from an unknown person. Second question: As I wrote, these images are not the full ones. I keep them for myself. So if anyone says that this is my photograph, my answer will be that this is not yours as the uploaded one (which is a part) is taken and chosen by me. That's why I insist on it. Thank you. Γεώργιος Τερζής 2 (talk) 22:08, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Γεώργιος Τερζής 2: Even if you don't known the photographer, it may not be really unknown. Anyway, works by anonymous people are usually protected for 70 years after the first publication. Regards, Yann (talk) 22:20, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

More of this my lawyer provided with a decision of a court in Greece. The photographers keep these rights only if THEY PROVE THAT THEIR IMAGE has "innvetevess" (I' m not sure if I have chosen the appropriate word), and this can't be regarded for well known persons (eg. ministers, movie stars, athletes etc). So the living photographers of this case lost the trial. Thank you for your time. Γεώργιος Τερζής 2 (talk) 22:37, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

That means THEY ARE NOT PROTECTED (at least in my country). Thank you. Γεώργιος Τερζής 2 (talk) 22:42, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Did you know any photographer in Greece of the 1980s? Nobody knows... Γεώργιος Τερζής 2 (talk) 22:45, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AND I WILL WRITE AGAIN : THIS IS MY IMAGE AND THIS IS MY ORIGINAL NAME. I DON'T WRITE WITH PSEYVONYMS AS I HAVE NOTHING TO BE AFRAID. Once more, thank you. Γεώργιος Τερζής 2 (talk) 22:54, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

And finally : I never asked these images to be included in commons. This is NOT my purpose. Γεώργιος Τερζής 2 (talk) 22:58, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

missing SDC copyright licenses and states

Hey Yann: Exactly what will be the meaning of if the words "missing SDC copyright status" or licenses show up? And furthermore, what would the letters SDC really stand for? I just downloaded my own condemned place placard on here; all years are my own copyright. I don't work here that often for fear of violating a copyright. talk 06:43, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker) @Tropical Storm Angela: those maintenance categories are nothing to worry about; it just means a bot hasn’t come by yet to copy the licence info into COM:SDC metadata (see link for some info on that).—Odysseus1479 (talk) 09:34, 18 October 2021 (UTC) P.S. I notice that you say File:Examples of condemned property warning.png is your own work, but the text in the image says it’s copyrighted by the city of Fayetteville. Can you explain that?—09:57, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion resuests

Hi Yann. Could you please delete the following files? Most likely these photos were not taken by the users that uploaded them. The users didn't reply in their talk pages and no users has objected to the deletion so far.

Omri • Talk 21:00, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Let's wait for a week, unless you find the source online. Yann (talk) 21:07, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The nominations for deletion have been opened more than a month ago, But i can wait one more week. Thanks! Omri • Talk 21:11, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Why photos, from festiwal, that are free to use, are being deleted?

Hi I don't really understand why... some of photos are photos of nature, that are my work. Thanks for explenation. SuchaKlub (talk) 20:51, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@SuchaKlub: Hi,

Your images were copied from another website. If they are yours, why don't you upload the original pictures? Otherwise, you will need to confirm the license with email. Please see COM:VRT for the procedure. Regards, Yann (talk) 21:01, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Most of those photos werr stored on my Google Photos cloud, that's why I downloaded them... but still all my photos are from public performances of performers, who know they are being documented by photo. SuchaKlub (talk) 16:40, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Are images the only problem

Do I need to delete the images? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Salman100801 (talk • contribs) 21:40, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Salman100801: Are you the photograper of these pictures? Regards, Yann (talk) 15:01, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Prin-Deyrançon

Bonjour, je vois que vous avez supprimé l'image importée pour le logo de la commune de Prin-Deyrançon. Est-il possible de mieux comprendre pourquoi ? Sachant que de pages de communes ont leur logo qui est affiché ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vlay79 (talk • contribs) 10:35, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Vlay79: Le détenteur des droits d'auteur est soit le designer du logo, soit la commune. Dans tous les cas, il faut une autorisation écrite pour garder ce fichier sur Commons. Vous pouvez importer le ficher sur Wikipedia en français, où il y a une exception. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 14:58, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Closure question

Hi Yann. I'm curious how you made the "Keep" decision for Commons:Deletion requests/File:101100-style air data boom.jpg, considering the source is a commercial entity, rather than NASA as stated. It just doesn't make sense. Thanks. — Huntster (t @ c) 14:06, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Andy Dingley is right. There is no substantial doubt that NASA is the author. The source doesn't matter here. Regards, Yann (talk) 14:55, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for responding, and for clarifying in the closure section. I can't fathom how either of you came to that conclusion, but I'm not going to beat my head against this brick wall. — Huntster (t @ c) 15:17, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Commons Photographers meeting on October 30th

Dear member of the Commons Photographers User Group,

I'm happy to invite you to our next virtual meeting next Saturday, October 30. This time, our colleagues User:Dey.sandip from India and User:Ermell from Germany will talk about their work.

If you're interested in joining this meeting, please sign up on the page below:

5th virtual meeting of the Commons Photographers User Group

I'm very much looking forward to this event and I hope you'll be able to join.

All the best, --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 18:36, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

How to add logos for wikidata properly?

Hi Yann, thank you for pointing out that my submissions are not adequate for commons. Unfortunatly I thing it's hard to find relyable information on how to submit

logos of commercial companies
logos of open projects

My goal is to refer them from wikidata, so the information chunks get a bit more illustrated. I thought that at least open projects (even without proper attribution) can be added to commons? And is the right way for company logos to redraw it and upload it with my attribution? --MyRobotron (talk) 07:07, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@MyRobotron: Complex logos have a copyright. They can't be accepted on Commons without a written permission from the copyright holder. They may be accepted on some Wikipedias (English, French, etc.) under some conditions. Regards, Yann (talk) 15:00, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah I see this point, but struggle why some logos of major (and minor) companies are available, while others aren't? How can I judge if a logo is complex or could be shared as a personal drawn image? How can I understand that

has so many famous brands, which obviously didn't grant permission, but it's logos are simple enough for a legal copy? (sorry for so much questions, but I don't see any way how I can add logos to wikidata -.- ) --MyRobotron (talk) 20:22, 26 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@MyRobotron: Wikidata doesn't accept fair use, so you can't add complex logos there, unless there is a permission from the copyright holder, or the logo is in the public domain (that may be the case for some old US logos, where there was no notice and/or no copyright renewal). Copyright treshold depends on the country, so it is very complex. Some countries have a high treshold (e.g. USA, Germany), while others have a very low treshold (e.g. UK, Australia). Please see COM:TOO for examples. Regards, Yann (talk) 20:33, 26 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Images discussion

@Yann No I am not the actual photographer of those pictures, but I have borrowed those picutures from the person about whom the article is, i.e from Satyam Mishra. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Salman100801 (talk • contribs) 11:57, 26 October 2021 (UTC) (UTC)[reply]

About that pic

It look like stiched by size, but i used Hi-Resolution option in camera, so it is single shot, done with Fisheye. --Mile (talk) 09:25, 26 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks your message. I went to read the article about your camera, to understand how you can get such a large image. Amazing! Yann (talk) 11:56, 26 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion photo / Permission given

Hi Yann,

we have received the permission to use the media uploaded, after you texted is. Is there anything else to do for us? https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Holoride_GmbH_Masterbrand_RGB.png

Thanks! --Holoride GmbH (talk) 12:18, 26 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion

Je ne sais comment te remercier de ce cadeau, d'autant que je n'aurai jamais cru qu'il serai promu. Non seulement il l'a été mais avec un score aussi confortable qu'inattendu. Merci ! --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:41, 30 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding audio upload

Hi, I tried uploading an audio file, which is my own work of combining trance with the Gayathri mantra. However, I was unable to upload the file through the upload wizard; it denied my upload. Could you help me with this regard? I was hoping to use the file under the "popular culture" section (along with my user page). Thank you, WikiLinuz (talk) 19:59, 30 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Seems like I need to convert the file into ogg format since I don't have autopatrolled rights. Sorry about that.
(Please ignore my previous message.) WikiLinuz (talk) 20:08, 30 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@WikiLinuz: You can do that with video2commons. Yann (talk) 21:44, 30 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion request

Hi, I've tagged [this file] for speedy deletion. Could you please delete the requested file? Thank you. WikiLinuz (talk) 20:46, 30 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Done by Túrelio. Yann (talk) 21:42, 30 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No reason

Hello sir, it appears that you have been removing disclaimers without reasons. Please type in your reason so we can understand why you removed it. Thanks! NileTravel (talk) 21:40, 30 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Commons Photographers User Group: first board election

Dear member of the Commons Photographers User Group,

In preparation of the first board election of our group, I invite you to take a look at the following page:

Commons:Commons Photographers User Group/Board Elections 2021

and provide feedback. I've listed a number of positions for our first board and I've also outlined a possible timeline for the elections. The current plan is to open the self-nomination process up on November 15 and then have the election start on December 1.

I'm super excited to get this going and I'm very much looking forward to hearing from you. Please use this talk page for your thoughts.

I hope you're safe and well, and I wish you all the best! --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 23:56, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

copyright

[Here https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:ListFiles/Edit_wiki_peadia] are copyright violations. --JusticeForce101 (talk) 11:25, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Done Blocked for a week. Yann (talk) 11:27, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The Lost World

Hello Yann, j'espère que tu vas bien. Le film a déjà été présenté comme MOTD dans une version teinte d'origine et de meilleure résolution. Cordialement, — Racconish ^💬 08:46, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Racconish: Salut,

Ah oui ici : Template:Motd/2017-08#13. J'ai récupéré une version avec une définition vraiment meilleure, mais je n'arrive pas à l'importer (par dessus File:The Lost World (1925), full.ogv) sur Commons à cause de plusieurs bugs empêchant les importations de gros fichiers. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 12:42, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pas compris : je l'ai déjà televersé. Cordialement, — Racconish ^💬 14:49, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Racconish: Une version 1080p qui fait 1,7 Go ? Où ça ? Yann (talk) 15:22, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yann, je te disais simplement (1) que le film a déjà été présenté comme MOTD et (2) que la version présentée est meilleure que celle que tu proposes, deux raisons, à mon avis, pour ne pas proposer cette dernière version à nouveau comme MOTD. Maintenant s'il s'agit de dire qu'on pourrait téléverser une meilleure version, c'est vrai, et je vais m'en occuper, pour la version originale teintée, mais je ne crois pas que ce soit une raison pour présenter le film à nouveau comme MOTD. Cordialement, — Racconish ^💬 22:29, 4 November 2021 (UTC) —

Done 22:54, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Racconish: Vu la discussion en ce moment à propos de MOTD, proposer à nouveau ce film dans une version haute-définition me semble une bonne idée. Cette version est-elle celle que j'ai importée sur IA ? Cordialement, Yann (talk) 06:58, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yann, j'ai mis à jour File:The Lost World (1925).webm avec deux améliorations ; la résolution, 950 x 720 au lieu de 480 x 360, et la durée, 01:42:25 au lieu de 01:32:23, à partir d'une source YouTube que j'ai précisée. La source est le dvd Lobster/Flicker Alley qui comporte une dizaine de minutes de séquences retrouvées ne figurant pas dans la version antérieure. La source Internet Archive que tu as utilisée pour File:The Lost World (1925), full.ogv n'est pas précisée sur Internet Archive mais elle est manifestement de moins bonne qualité, plus courte et noir et blanc alors que le film est teinté dans toutes les versions d'exploitation. En tout état de cause, File:The Lost World (1925), full.ogv est une version moins bonne que File:The Lost World (1925).webm, que ce soit dans le téléversement d'origine de cette dernière ou a fortiori dans la mise à jour que je viens d'en faire et je ne vois aucune raison valable de préférer cette version. Par ailleurs, je suis au courant de la discussion en cours sur MOTD mais elle n'a pas permis de dégager de consensus. Nous avons des tonnes de très beaux films jamais montrés en MOTD et je ne suis pas partisan de pratiquer ici un passage en force. Au total, il me semble préférable de remplacer ta version de qualité inférieure de The Lost World (qui devrait à mon sens être supprimée) par autre chose, par exemple File:Sherlock Holmes (1916).webm. Cordialement, — Racconish ^💬 07:59, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Racconish: Je trouve les couleurs vraiment moches. C'est pourquoi j'ai cherché une version en N&B que j'ai téléchargée avec un fichier Torrent (7AA48F18C2B9FA37C4F0190B6801D8481118A057, 1.66 GB, 23.976 fps, 1920 x 1080). Mais on peut attendre que la discussion soit terminée avant de proposer à nouveau ce film. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 10:16, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yann, le jugement de goût mis à part, j'ai l'impression que tu considères que les films muets sont nécessairement en noir et blanc, ce qui est faux. Outre les colorations au pochoir, de nombreux films étaient teints dans des couleurs signifiantes. Par exemple le bleu pour la nuit, l'ocre pour le jour, le vert pour les scène fantastiques, etc. Il n'y a aucune raison de considérer qu'un noir et blanc est plus conforme à l'original que la version teintée quand celle-ci est d'origine [3]. Ce procédé n'a rien à voir avec la colorisation digitale de vieux films. Voir [4] ou [5]. La version que tu as téléversée n'a donc ni l'avantage de la durée (trop courte, scènes manquantes), ni celui de la résolution (trop basse), ni celui de la couleur (noir et blanc non conforme à la version d'origine). Cordialement, — Racconish ^💬 12:16, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Racconish: J'ai bien compris que certains vieux films étaient montrés au public dans une version colorée, mais cette couleur est un ajout postérieur à la prise de vue. Je veux bien que l'on garde une version colorée quand celle ci date de l’époque de la production, mais on devrait aussi avoir une version en N&B, comme on a plusieurs versions avec des montages différents. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 12:34, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Peu importe que la post-production soit postérieure au tournage, ce qui compte c'est qu'il s'agisse de l'intention de l'auteur et non d'une modification ultérieure, voire anachronique, qui ne corresponde pas à l'intention de celui-ci. Au cas particulier, il n'y a aucun doute que la version d'exploitation, celle qui a été présentée aux spectateurs lors de la sortie du film, était teinte, comme l'étaient beaucoup de films de l'époque. Cela n'a pas de sens d'affirmer qu'une version noir et blanc devrait être plus conforme à une prétendue vérité historique s'il est établi, comme c'est le cas ici, que le film est bien sorti en version teinte. Cordialement, — Racconish ^💬 13:35, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Racconish: The video2commons process again stopped with an error: An exception occurred: FileNotFoundError: b'[Errno 2] No such file or directory'. :( Yann (talk) 08:13, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Je ne sais pas ce que tu étais en train de faire, mais j'évite autant que faire se peut, de mon côté, d'utiliser video2commons. Cordialement, — Racconish ^💬 08:22, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Racconish: Et pourquoi ? Quel outil utilises-tu pour convertir les vidéos ? J'essaie maintenant de l'importer sur YT. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 08:26, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

J'utilise ffmpeg, le sous-jacent de video2commons. Cordialement, — Racconish ^💬 08:35, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

J'ai importé le film sur YT, mais il a été supprimé. :((( Yann (talk) 12:44, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Earwax on swab.jpg

I've been going through FPCs to get some stats. As part of this, I've fixed some results where the maths was wrong. So far, this hasn't changed the result of any candidate. But it does in the above one. The FPC bot tallied 8 oppose votes and recorded that draft result. Then JovanCormac struck one vote according to "new rules", which I guess concerned number of contributions necessary. You then reviewed the FPC bot but didn't spot the oppose vote count had changed. According to the rules, a 14:7 vote should be featured. I'm not familiar with the steps needed to feature a candidate. Are you able to fix this one and promote it? -- Colin (talk) 14:29, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Colin: Promoted. Should it be added in the recent images list, and on this month, or on the month it was nominated? Yann (talk) 15:09, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I think it would make more sense to add it to the archive as though it was featured then. Unless you feel it deserves a chance at POTY next year? I don't mind. Thanks for the fixes. -- Colin (talk) 15:29, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Who knows? Yann (talk) 15:52, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Indonesia bike27.JPG

I wonder if you can help with this one too. It got 4 support and 3 oppose, which should have failed even back then. Instead, it got promoted and featured on the main page. The user who promoted it hasn't edited here for years. Can you un-feature it? -- Colin (talk) 14:41, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, you are digging prehistoric stuff! I fixed this one. Yann (talk) 15:06, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:4-Stroke-Engine.gif

How do you feel about this one? According to the rules at the time -- "Ratio of supporting/opposing votes at least 2/1 (a two-thirds majority, that means at least 67% supporting)" -- it should have been promoted. It had 8 support and 4 oppose (one of the support templates (Tak) was deleted so is hard to see). But it wasn't promoted. It is a tiny animated gif and I think we'd have delisted it if it had been featured. Should this one be left not promoted? -- Colin (talk) 16:24, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, exactly. If we want to be rigorists, we can promote it, and then nominate it for deletion, but I don't see the point. Yann (talk) 16:29, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please help me

Hello, I noticed that an wikimedia editor tagged and deleted several sourced pictures which were copyrighted under:Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Please restore these images and check the sources I provided. See:https://www.nature.com/articles/s42003-020-01162-2

As example: Commons:Undeletion_requests/Current_requests#File:Northwards_migration_of_Basal_East_Asian_lineage_(model_A_and_B).jpg

They were all tagged by an suspicious new user which you already warned: User_talk:SsSsSs0909

Please check this controversy and help me to restore sourced and useful pictures. Thank you. Mev Shreb (talk) 18:20, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

FYI: see Commons:Undeletion_requests/Current_requests#File:Northwards_migration_of_Basal_East_Asian_lineage_(model_A_and_B).jpg. Эlcobbola _talk 18:57, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Why was the logo removed?

Hello, how are you? I am talking about the topic of deleting File:نادي الوشم السعودي.png I work in this club and I have permission to put any information on wiki pages, including the club's logo — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ammaralyousef (talk • contribs) 07:31, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Ammaralyousef: Please confirm the license via email (see COM:VRT for the procedure). Do not reupload it, or you will be blocked. Thanks, Yann (talk) 09:12, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion at QIC talk page

A discussion is being held here, over the reviewing process at QIC and the possibility of improving our Image Guidelines. As a regular contributor to the project, your opinion would be most welcome and valued. Alvesgaspar (talk) 11:43, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Watercolor_paintings_by_Gerda_Cederblom

Category:Watercolor_paintings_by_Gerda_Cederblom has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Thurs (talk) 19:44, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Thurs: OK, fine. Thanks for looking into that. BTW, there is no need to create a DR. Empty categories are automatically deleted. Regards, Yann (talk) 19:55, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

NileTravel continues adding nonsense templates

Hello, NileTravel continues adding templates about communism in simple photos of people. He also deletes your warnings from his talk page (without archiving the page). And I really think that this user with a such nickname may be a puppet of NileTravel. — Soul Train (talk) 11:19, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Done Both blocked. Thanks for reporting. Yann (talk) 12:03, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Another account. — Soul Train (talk) 02:43, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

OTRS et le Musée de la Parole en Ardenne

Bonjour Yann,

L'utilisateur Lucyin (également auteur), avec qui je contribue sur Wikisource en wallon, a récemment contacté le Musée de la Parole en Ardenne pour leur demander de libérer quelques œuvres pour lesquelles il détient le droit d'auteur. Le président actuel, Joël Thiry (également auteur) a accepté d'en libérer quelques-unes et il est prêt a envoyer une autorisation en suivant la procédure appropriée. On m'a chargé de mettre en place le nécessaire pour que tout se déroule sans encombre. J'aurais cependant besoin d'un peu d'aide pour faire les choses correctement côté Commons. Pourrais-tu m'éclairer sur le point suivant : étant donné que l'autorisation contiendra les liens des fac-similés stockés sur Commons, y a-t-il un modèle particulier à apposer sur les pages des fac-similés en attendant que le tiket OTRS (ou plutôt VRT maintenant) soit validé ? Merci d'avance pour tes lumières. Reptilien.19831209BE1 (talk) 16:08, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Reptilien.19831209BE1: Tu peux ajouter dans le champ "Permission" de chaque fichier {{subst:OP}}. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 22:42, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Merci, c'est précisément ce dont j'avais besoin. Reptilien.19831209BE1 (talk) 11:52, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

License question

Hi Yann, I uploaded this derivative file today, a restoration. The original file here has a green flickr review template. Can I just copy the same template to the derivative file? Or do we have to wait for the derivative's license to be reviewed independently? Thanks. Bammesk (talk) 20:56, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Bammesk: I reviewed the license. Yann (talk) 22:15, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Commons Photographers elections: self-nomination phase is open

Dear member of the Commons Photographers User Group,

The self-nomination phase for the first board election of our group is open as of today. If you'd like to take on a more active role and take our user group to the next level, please consider running for one of the open positions. Please check out the Board Election 2021 page for more details.

I hope you, your family, and your friends are doing well. All the best! --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 16:40, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Permission for media granted (I hope).

Yann, hello! You nominated my media (painting) for deletion: File:Woman in Red Hat and Purple Dress I.png

  I am the owner/art creator. I emailed my permission to VRT (I hope. VRT requires an email address associated with the site/blog/social media account where the work was first published, but I created the painting in 2008 and I have no idea of where I first published it.) Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by SouthernMuse (talk • contribs) 17:34, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@SouthernMuse: Hi,

Yes, we need the formal written permission from the artist for all recent works of art. You should send one for each of your paintings. Please also note that works of art by non notable artists may not be accepted, unless they show a special technic or they are used in an article (see COM:SCOPE#Examples for the details). Regards, Yann (talk) 17:42, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bookshelf in a house from Bucharest (Romania).jpg

Hi there! Please delete this file. It had been nominated for delection since 10 November 2021 by me, and you said that it can be after a week since its nomination, but it hasn't been removed since.--Neoclassicism Enthusiast (talk) 17:56, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Done Yann (talk) 18:00, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! ^_^--Neoclassicism Enthusiast (talk) 18:01, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Suppression de nombreuses images

Bonjour,

Je suis très étonnés que vous ayez supprimé un nombre important de photographies illustrant des articles sur des films. Par exemple "Visages suisses" + Simon Edelstein + CD-Rom Genesys.

Je suis l'auteur de ces photos et j'en ^ossède les droits. --2A01:CB14:1E9:2700:6C04:C9FD:53B0:AACF 11:56, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Ripolin01: Bonjour,

Merci de vous loguer et de signer vos messages.

Pour tout contenu publié ailleurs auparavant, une autorisation écrite formelle pour une licence libre est nécessaire. Veuillez voir COM:VRT pour les instructions. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 11:59, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Screenshot of permission given by Vanillasky.png

Why did you delete this file? Do you reject my argument that it is in scope? Does this screenshot itself have copyright issues? Brianjd (talk) 13:04, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Permission should be sent via COM:VRT. Screenshots are not acceptable for permission. Regards, Yann (talk) 13:06, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The screenshot was intended as permission for File:Anupam Tripathi.png. But it is not acceptable for this purpose, because it is a screenshot. I understand that.

But the same message in the form of a COM:VRT e-mail would still be unacceptable, because it only gives permission for Wikimedia projects and not for all uses. This led me to suggest that the screenshot is useful for a different purpose, demonstrating misunderstandings of copyright and Commons licensing. So we could delete File:Anupam Tripathi.png but keep File:Screenshot of permission given by Vanillasky.png. And no one has responded to this suggestion. Brianjd (talk) 13:14, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

[1] Okay, I can find ten differences, all of which could be down to editing errors or using a slightly different edition—none look like original creative work on Dr West's part.

[a]

User talk:Yann/archives 48

You marked Copyright violations on material we own and it needs to be fixed

Wiki Loves Food 2021 in India

File source is not properly indicated: File:BS Negi GOC.jpg

Systematic edit warring, pushing of national supremacy ideas in Wikimedia Commons

Report

We need your feedback!

File tagging File:Abu Dhabi Police F999.jpg

It's Wiki Loves Monuments time again!

Fichier Xavier Galmiche

N1TH Music

Edit-conflict on Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Markuss86

File:V Admiral Imran pic.jpg

POV pseudohistorians - mass delete

Caged (2020 film)

Copyright Problem

Your deletion

Images of Joav BarEl

Deletion of File:S East Geology.jpg

You delete Wikimedia commons

Target Australia logos

Copyright on Columbia Pool Image

Consultation about deletion of the logo of the baseball team Toros de Herrera de Panamá

Deleted content

Ghandi's son in New York

File:I Wish to Say.jpg and File:Oring Headshot.jpg

Contested undeletion

I have a doubt

You deleted pictures that I took

Your deletions and comments on my discussion page

Skeleton exam

Why was sakurai photo removed

AzMarie Livingston

Cake Logo Claim thing

Copyright status: File:Photo of Rita C. Richey courtesy of Wayne State University web page.jpg

File:'Maji Maji Rebellion memorial', Kilwa Kivinje.jpg.

AN

Ordnungspolizei-impfpass, bitte

Wrong deletion reason

Selfie

Proposed images for deletion

missing SDC copyright licenses and states

Deletion resuests

Why photos, from festiwal, that are free to use, are being deleted?

Are images the only problem

Prin-Deyrançon

Closure question

Commons Photographers meeting on October 30th

How to add logos for wikidata properly?

Images discussion

About that pic

Deletion photo / Permission given

FP Promotion

Regarding audio upload

Deletion request

No reason

Commons Photographers User Group: first board election

copyright

The Lost World

Please help me

Why was the logo removed?

Discussion at QIC talk page

NileTravel continues adding nonsense templates

OTRS et le Musée de la Parole en Ardenne

License question

Commons Photographers elections: self-nomination phase is open

Permission for media granted (I hope).

Suppression de nombreuses images

Navigation menu

Search