User talk:Yann/archives 46

À propos de Commons:Undeletion_requests/Archive/2019-07#File:Ariano_Irpino_maiolica_-_acquasantiera.jpeg

Salut Yann. Il s'agit d'un bénitier, d'un conteneur d'eau bénite. Je ne vois pas comme ça pourrait être un objet 2D (l'eau coulerait dehors !). De plus, la source indique: Copyright: © Victoria and Albert Museum, London 2018. All Rights Reserved. --Ruthven (msg) 12:54, 6 July 2019 (UTC)

@Ruthven: OK, I misunderstood the issue. I thought it was about the copyright of the object, because the image doesn't come from the given source. I reopened a DR. Regards, Yann (talk) 13:04, 6 July 2019 (UTC)

Please alert uploader before deleting

Please do not delete files from Category:Kuvasiskot (or elsewhere) without alerting the uploader first. A couple of weeks ago you bluntly deleted the file Ahti-Karjalainen-1980.jpg although I could have added the required information. Please do not repeat such actions. It would be easier for me to add the information that to upload the image anew. --Mlang.Finn (talk) 17:25, 6 July 2019 (UTC)

@Mlang.Finn: Hi,

I always inform uploader, and you should not reupload a deleted file. Instead, you should request undeletion.

For files from external sources with a free license, you should request a license review. I did it for you this time. Regards, Yann (talk) 17:46, 6 July 2019 (UTC)

You did not inform me. It was by chance that I realized the file was unfairly and silently deleted. --Mlang.Finn (talk) 17:54, 6 July 2019 (UTC)

For some reason, I never noticed the alert. (That may be my mistake but I’m puzzled.) --Mlang.Finn (talk) 17:57, 6 July 2019 (UTC)

User's POV-push

Hi Yann, if you remember few month ago after the discussion on the COM:AN, you reverted the disputed version of the file to proper one. After that the situation has calmed down, but now on 16:47, 4 July 2019, the user Cherkash again made his controversial edit, so I reverted his version to your version. I'am writing here just to notify you. Regards.--Ⴂ. ႡႠႪႠႾႠႻႤ★ 06:49, 8 July 2019 (UTC)

 Done I blocked this user for 2 weeks. Yann (talk) 06:54, 8 July 2019 (UTC)

User:SHINGO154

Please check SHINGO154 (talk · contribs)'s newest copyright violations. SLBedit (talk) 15:13, 8 July 2019 (UTC)

 Done Already blocked for sockpuppetry. Yann (talk) 15:22, 8 July 2019 (UTC)

Copyright violations

According to my research the photos I have uploaded are all in the public domain under Canadian Copyright Laws. I apologize if I have made a mistake. — Preceding unsigned comment added by JeromeOBrien (talk • contribs) 13:09, 10 July 2019 (UTC)

@JeromeOBrien: Hi,

Yes, that's quite possible, but you didn't provide enough information, and/or the wrong license. If you would fix that, the files could be undeleted. I did it for File:Petty Harbour Newfoundland Canada Late 1800's.jpg. Please add categories there. Regards, Yann (talk) 13:23, 10 July 2019 (UTC)

PS: Please sign your messages.

Gaspard Bou

Bonjour,

J'ai contacté l'entreprise afin qu'il mette à disposition l'image de manière libre de droit. Avez-vous des conseils d'articles d'ailleurs pour aider à l'entreprise de certifier son image ?

Merci pour votre aide, Gaspard — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gaspard Bou (talk • contribs) 17:03, 11 July 2019 (UTC)

Bonjour,

Voyez COM:OTRS/fr pour la procédure à suivre. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 17:07, 11 July 2019 (UTC)

PS: Merci de signer vos messages.

James C. Harrison Photos

Hello Yann, You have deleted an image that was uploaded to the James C. Harrison on his Wikipedia page, due to copyright violation. It actually does not violate any copyright, because I own the work and it is my photo. Please advise. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by CASMich (talk • contribs) 14:13, 13 July 2019 (UTC)

@CASMich: Hi,

Even if you own the work of art, its copyright is owned by the artist's heirs. We need a permission from them. Regards, Yann (talk) 15:16, 13 July 2019 (UTC)

Adminship request

Can you support my adminship request? Commons:Administrators/Requests/PlanespotterA320. Thanks.--PlanespotterA320 (talk) 15:22, 15 July 2019 (UTC)

Can you have a look at it

• This file was uploaded by me and OTRS mail was sent by creator regarding the same, but it has not been confirmed till now, now the date of without otrs is about to end/ended. There is no reply from the otrs member. I am tensed now, as there is a huge team of volunteers is been working to bring those volumes on mrwikisource. The OTRS member who was handling this file doesn't seems to be active anymore or they are failing to understand the Marathi names and descriptions. If you could have a look at this and do whatever is needed that would great help to us. thanks and regard. QueerEcofeminist ^{"cite! even if you fight"!!!} [they/them/their] 07:46, 16 July 2019 (UTC)

@QueerEcofeminist: Do you have the ticket number? Regards, Yann (talk) 09:27, 16 July 2019 (UTC)

yes, Ticket:2019060610003485. QueerEcofeminist ^{"cite! even if you fight"!!!} [they/them/their] 09:37, 16 July 2019 (UTC)

OK, I added the ticket number, so the date is postponed. Regards, Yann (talk) 09:42, 16 July 2019 (UTC)

@QueerEcofeminist: The person claiming the copyright didn't say how he aquired it. Copyright remains with the author unless a specific contract was done with the author. Pinging @Krd: . Regards, Yann (talk) 17:20, 16 July 2019 (UTC)

@Krd and Yann: ,

* I uploaded the file, The CEO/Head of the publishing organization sent in a OTRS mail to free copyrights.

* As the person who happens to be head/CEO of the publishing organization He is copyright holder, and those volumes were written by several authors and further edited by a team of editors. And the copyrights are with publishing organizations

* Now, I am not able to understand that, what is the problem in accepting the CEO/Heads email as a valid permission? Even first email mentioned that, the email sender happens to be head/CEO of the publishing organization.

* Thanks for the help and postponement of date QueerEcofeminist ^{"cite! even if you fight"!!!} [they/them/their] 17:33, 16 July 2019 (UTC)

@QueerEcofeminist: He is writing from a Gmail address, and didn't provide provide any identity proof. I think he should either write from the official email address of the company, or send a copy of his ID, and at least explain in which conditions he acquired the copyright. If the photographer was only a contractor, the copyright of his works remain with him. I will let Krd decide what exactly is needed. Regards, Yann (talk) 17:38, 16 July 2019 (UTC)

@Krd: , So, copy of his ID or mail from official email id should work? QueerEcofeminist ^{"cite! even if you fight"!!!} [they/them/their] 06:29, 17 July 2019 (UTC)

Affiche Carnage

Bonjour je suis l'auteur de l'Affiche Carnage 1981 que vous avez supprimée et je m'en étonne, de plus elle apporte une référence sur son inspiration du Radeau de la méduse de Géricault CDlt — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ambrieu (talk • contribs) 14:38, 16 July 2019 (UTC)

@Ambrieu: Bonjour,

Il y a eu un message vous informant qu'il fallait fournir une autorisation, auquel vous n'avez pas répondu. Voyez COM:OTRS/fr pour la procédure. Vous devriez aussi fournir un fichier avec une taille plus importante. Ici la taille est si petite que c'est le fichier n'a pas beaucoup d’utilité. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 17:16, 16 July 2019 (UTC)

Structured Data on Commons - IRC office hours this week, 18 July

The Structured Data team is hosting an IRC office hour this week on Thursday, 18 July, from 17:00-18:00 UTC. Joining information as well as date and time conversion is available on Meta. Potential topics for discussion are the testing of "other statements", properties that may need to be created for Commons on Wikidata soon, plans for the rest of SDC development, or whatever you might want to discuss. The development team looks forward to seeing you there. -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 18:51, 16 July 2019 (UTC)

Correction to Lack of Copy Right Tag

Hi, This is Nimitz Zhang. I recently uploaded File:3 cm flak 303 twin ubts.jpg, which is marked by you for lack of Copy Right information.

I sincerely apologize for the inconvience brought to you (this is my first time), please forgive me.

I have updated essential information to the upload and have added an attribution tag along with link to the permission rules of the website.

Can you please re-check my upload for issues and possibly clear it of lack of tags?

Thank you.

--Nimitz Zhang (talk) 16:14, 15 July 2019 (UTC)

@Nimitz Zhang: Hi,

This image might be in the public domain due to age, but the license you gave is certainly wrong. We need to know who was the photographer, when it was first published, to assess the copyright status. Regards, Yann (talk) 17:54, 15 July 2019 (UTC)

--Hi, can you please start me off on some way to find the original photographer/copyright owner? This was my first time and through my stupid efforts of Google imaging, I traced the image to 7 different websites. But they are all modern and I'm not sure which (if any) owns the photograph. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nimitz Zhang (talk • contribs) 18:27, 15 July 2019 (UTC)

@Nimitz Zhang: Could you first fix the date, and change author to unknown if you can't find it? Thanks, Yann (talk) 09:44, 16 July 2019 (UTC)

Respectfully done. Currently, I am sending out email to both German and Russian website owners posting that image with google translate to trace the image to its source. I am afraid that they will ignore me or cannot find the source either, and the 7 day deletion delay is running low - is there a faster, more professional way of tracing the image to its owner? Thanks ahead. --Nimitz Zhang (talk) 15:33, 16 July 2019 (UTC)

@Nimitz Zhang: Do not remove information. Add an approximate date, and {{Unknown}} in the author field. Regards, Yann (talk) 17:12, 16 July 2019 (UTC)

Done again. I contacted the author of the oldest post containing that image, and he linked me to an even older post, whose author seems to be Polish - I hope he uses Google Translate and has more info on that image.

One point I would like to bring up is that the image is probably taken in Germany in late 1944 or mid 1945. If an image belongs to the public domain 70 years after it was taken, then this image should be free to use by logic, even though I cannot find its photographer (One of the German weapon workers)? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nimitz Zhang (talk • contribs) 18:08, 16 July 2019 (UTC)

@Nimitz Zhang: Yes, that is a possibility. So write that in the description with {{Anonymous-EU}} as a license. Mention all the research you did about the author. Regards, Yann (talk) 05:16, 17 July 2019 (UTC)

Thank you for pointing that out. Please check if I have done them correctly or what more I need to add regarding date, photographer and license. Furthermore, I wonder who will eventually check and confirm the license (which will prevent the image from being deleted) and when he/she will check it, for 7 days till deletion is not a long time. Thanks and regards! --Nimitz Zhang (talk) 20:59, 17 July 2019 (UTC)

@Nimitz Zhang: I further edited the description. That's how it should be. Please note that it is the date of publication which matters, not the date it was taken. Regards, Yann (talk) 05:08, 18 July 2019 (UTC)

PS: You don't need to ping me on my own talk page.

Thanks a ton! I have a lot to learn indeed. Please don't reply - I know you are busy but just want to show gratitude. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nimitz Zhang (talk • contribs) 05:52, 18 July 2019 (UTC)

Copies d'écran

Bonjour, Je tiens à m'excuser pour tout. Je ne savais pas encore tout concernant les violations de droits d'auteurs d'images. Je n'importerai plus de copies d'images sur wikimedia. Cordialement,

Espace21 (talk) 07:41, 19 July 2019 (UTC)

Stefan Gromnicki.jpg

Hi, sorry for the problems with inserted graphics. I am new and I do not fully understand how everything works. I plan to study the principles of licensing. According to the instructions, I have sent the authorization to share this graphic with the e-mail address indicated. Please don't block my account. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dariusz Kot (talk • contribs) Yann (talk) 09:42, 20 July 2019 (UTC) (UTC)

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Dariusz Kot (talk • contribs) Hi,

Please fix the license, the date and the author for File:Stefan Gromnicki.jpg. Thanks, Yann (talk) 09:44, 20 July 2019 (UTC)

Copy right issue with PHOTO FEATURE SC Chafekar.jpg

Hi Yann,

I can see that you have issues copy right warning for this image:

Do not copy images from other sources. Thanks, --Yann (talk) 04:18, 20 July 2019 (UTC)

Please add the sources of your images, or they will be deleted, i.e. File:PHOTO FEATURE SC Chafekar.jpg. You should also name your images properly. Thanks, Yann (talk) 04:20, 20 July 2019 (UTC)

I wanted to understand that i have already mentioned that the source of the image. It is from the author or Own work and i have changed the desc to suggest what the picture is about.

DO you need any other details? Please let me know so that i can make the changes asap. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Manas.chafekar (talk • contribs) 12:10, 20 July 2019 (UTC) (UTC)

@Manas.chafekar: Please see my answer in Commons:Deletion requests/File:PHOTO FEATURE SC Chafekar1.jpg. Regards, Yann (talk) 12:15, 20 July 2019 (UTC)

I have added the source. It is not from any url or link but it was provided by the director directly as a copy on digital drive. Let me know if the changes i have made are now appropriate? Are any other changes required? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Manas.chafekar (talk • contribs) 14:51, 20 July 2019 (UTC) (UTC)

@Manas.chafekar: You don't need to ping me on my own talk page.

Please sign your messages with ~~~~.

Ok for File:AVM SC Chafekar receiving Shaurya Chakra from President of India in 2009.jpg.

Now what is the source of File:AVM SC Chafekar presented with Ati Vishisht Seva Medal at Rashtrapati Bhavan in 2015.jpg?

Regards, Yann (talk) 14:51, 20 July 2019 (UTC)

Got it. Sorry about that. :) So there is no issue for File:AVM SC Chafekar receiving Shaurya Chakra from President of India in 2009.jpg? As for File:AVM SC Chafekar presented with Ati Vishisht Seva Medal at Rashtrapati Bhavan in 2015.jpg i have added the source. This file was also provided by the director directly as a copy on digital drive. Let me know if the changes i have made are now appropriate? Can you also undelete the request on the picture File:AVM SC Chafekar presented with Ati Vishisht Seva Medal at Rashtrapati Bhavan in 2015.jpg?Manas.chafekar (talk) 15:13, 20 July 2019 (UTC)

@Manas.chafekar: OK, all fine now. Regards, Yann (talk) 15:17, 20 July 2019 (UTC)

Thank you for the confirmation. I had nominated the pic File:AVM SC Chafekar presented with Ati Vishisht Seva Medal at Rashtrapati Bhavan in 2015.jpg for deletion since there was copyright issue. Now that it is resolved, can you remove the nomination so that i can reuse it in the articles?Manas.chafekar (talk) 15:25, 20 July 2019 (UTC)

Monaco and NBA files

Hi, about Monaco photos they are my own work, I did it with my former phone (I changed it because I broke it); about NBA files, there was a huge mistake: you can see everything from here (check "Cipriana Canovi files" to see why), Cipriana Canovi allowed me to use the photos but the guys of Commons Italy never answered her, that's the problem. --Valentinenba97 (msg) 14:19, 20 July 2019 (CEST)

@Valentinenba97: Hi,

It seems we never got a permission for these files. Although I don't speak Italian, I checked the tickets. If we receive a permission, the files could be undeleted. Regards, Yann (talk) 12:22, 20 July 2019 (UTC)

The bad thing is that she sent an E-Mail to them, but they didn't answer, and I can make a screenshot of that. --Valentinenba97 (msg) 14:25, 20 July 2019 (CEST)

@Valentinenba97: There are 3 tickets about Cipriana Canovi: ticket:2019031710006314, ticket:2019030510009432, ticket:2019030310003192, and as far as Google Translate allows, none of them contains a valid permission. Pinging @Ruthven: . Regards, Yann (talk) 12:48, 20 July 2019 (UTC)

@Valentinenba97: Hello! Valentino, for the Monaco files, they were published on Facebook, before than here. You should just point us to your Facebook profile, so that we can verify the permission. Same for the NBA files. Thanks --Ruthven (msg) 18:16, 20 July 2019 (UTC)

Note to Yann: we've a permission from Cipriana Canovi (ticket:2019031710006314), but never had a file + source linked to it (so, it has never been "validated"). --Ruthven (msg) 18:18, 20 July 2019 (UTC)

About Monaco one of the photos is on my Instagram profile, I didn't want to give it for privacy but if you want it. Unfortunally the other one is on my former phone which is dead. --Valentinenba97 (msg) 20:19, 20 July 2019 (CEST)

Luna 3 closure

I really do not understand this closure, considering it goes directly against the very rationale you cited when closing Commons:Deletion requests/File:Luna 3 moon.jpg. The rationale for the latter was (mistakenly, I believe, since it goes against COM:PCP, which *is* policy) that a strong argument could be made for that image to fall under {{PD-RU-exempt-autocam}}. However, that argument does not apply to File:Image invisible hemisphere of the Moon from Luna-3.gif, since that image has been blatantly manipulated by human hands, being a derivative of File:Luna 3 moon.jpg, so the autocam argument simply fails. Further, it's now still licensed as {{PD-USGov-NASA}}, which is also blatantly false. What then should the license be? It can't be autocam, and it can't be NASA. I just don't get this. — Huntster (t @ c) 13:23, 21 July 2019 (UTC)

@Huntster: Hi,

Ok, I changed the license. Thanks for pointing that out.

For the deletion rationale, you claim that the restoration created a copyright, right? So far, I have never seen that accepted, but you are free to open a new DR for testing that. But that's not what you wrote previously. Regards, Yann (talk) 13:30, 21 July 2019 (UTC)

Speedy delete

Hi Yann, I had marked few photographs inside a complete albumn from flickr and forget to dismark there, because they shows not substantielly peoples, only parents or other other people of the children. So these are not teh goal of Commons. merci K@rl (talk) 14:13, 21 July 2019 (UTC)

PS:Few of these are very similar to others and so there are not helpfull too. Have a look in the corresponding cateory. -K@rl (talk) 14:24, 21 July 2019 (UTC)

@Karl Gruber: OK, but your deletion rationale was not very clear. I think group photos of sport teams should be within scope. Regards, Yann (talk) 14:57, 21 July 2019 (UTC)

Okay, do you revert there now? --thx K@rl (talk) 15:37, 21 July 2019 (UTC)

FV Promotion

This file has been promoted to Featured media! The file File:Tverskaya Street in Moscow, Russia (May 1896).webm, which you nominated at Commons:Featured media candidates/File:Tverskaya Street in Moscow, Russia (May 1896).webm, has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another file, please do so.

/FVCBot (talk) 01:39, 22 July 2019 (UTC)

Savoir vivre

Bonjour Yann. Quelques questions : - Tu as supprimé une catégorie que j'avais créée (Paul.schrepfer) pour regrouper "mes" médias, sans aucun avertissement. Pour quel motif ? Mystère puisque : - Sur le motif, je lis : Empty category (C3) , je pense qu'Empty veut dire vide, ce qui n'était pas le cas puisque j'avais commencé à y regrouper les médias que j'avais versé. C3 : 3. Catégorie vide inutile. Si une catégorie est vide et est manifestement inutilisable et ne sera probablement jamais utilisée de manière significative, elle peut être supprimée rapidement. Ne pas appliquer si la page est marquée d'une explication de la raison pour laquelle elle doit être conservée ou si la suppression peut être controversée, si la catégorie a été récemment vidée de manière inconsidérée, etc. Pensez à rediriger ou à renommer la catégorie au lieu de la supprimer. Cette catégorie était utile, utilisable sans aucune difficulté, elle n'était pas vide sauf à ce qu'elle ait été vidée de manière inconsidérée. - Le mutisme est-il la règle sur Commons ? J'essaie de m'investir dans ce projet, et j'ai l'impression que l'on cherche à me décourager : méthodes brutales, absence d'explications ou explications non rationnelles (C3 sans fondement, suppression de médias ne posant pas de problème, par exemple) Je souhaite sincèrement que mes craintes ne soient pas fondées. Merci par avance de tes réponses. Cordialement - C'est moi (talk) 09:46, 22 July 2019 (UTC)

@Paul.schrepfer: Bonjour,

Merci de lire Commons:User-specific galleries, templates and categories, et d'assumer la bonne foi. Les accusations ci-dessus ne sont pas acceptables sur Commons. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 09:57, 22 July 2019 (UTC)

@Yann: , ta réponse est partielle et laconique, mais je m'en contenterai. Il n'y a aucune accusation dans mon message, simplement des constatations et des questions, faute d'interlocuteurs simplement cordiaux depuis quelques jours. Je n'ai pas de réponse à toutes mes questions, c'est dommage pour le savoir vivre et une contribution apaisée. Je lis dans la page que tu m'as indiquée : Les utilisateurs sont libres de créer des catégories qui leur sont dédiées, du type « Category:Photos by User:Exemple ». Ces catégories doivent impérativement être marquées avec {{User category}}, qui a pour effet de les catégoriser dans Category:User categories et d’en faire des catégories cachées. Sans doute ais-je oublié de marquer ma catégorie avec {{User category}} dont j'ignorais l'existence, il était aussi simple de me le signifier au lieu d'invoquer C3, qui m'a semblé concerner les catégories vides ou inutilisables, pour la supprimer. Tout le monde se doit d'assumer la bonne foi ! Cordialement également. - C'est moi (talk) 11:35, 22 July 2019 (UTC)

@Paul.schrepfer: Avant de supprimer la catégorie, j'ai déplacé toutes les images dans Category:Images by Paul Schrepfer. C'est pourquoi elle était vide. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 11:41, 22 July 2019 (UTC)

PS : Ce n'est pas nécessaire de me pinguer sur ma propre page de discussion.

Bonjour, c'est tout de même pas compliqué de s'expliquer. Merci de bien vouloir renommer cette catégorie en "Images by Paul.schrepfer". Cordialement. - C'est moi (talk) 11:45, 22 July 2019 (UTC)

Template Artwork

Hi Yann. Sorry to disturb you, but I have run into a discussion about the use of this template, here: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Template_talk:Artwork#Use_of_parameter_%22other_versions%22. Your support would be appreciated. Cheers --Rsteen (talk) 16:47, 22 July 2019 (UTC)

Copyright Violation - File:Chris 2011.jpg

Hello Yann,

Thank you for your message and warning.

These pictures are made from me with my permission.

Although, I do not know who made these pictures, as I have no contact to him.

I visited Russia couple of years ago, and have no idea about the author.

So, what to do now?

Thank you for your help!

Chris — Preceding unsigned comment added by This1s3mpire (talk • contribs) 07:13, 23 July 2019 (UTC) (UTC)

@This1s3mpire: Hi,

You are not allowed to upload images from others without a formal written permission. If you get a permission, please see COM:OTRS for the instructions. Regards, Yann (talk) 07:19, 23 July 2019 (UTC)

PS: Please sign your messages with ~~~~

How can I get a written permission if the person is completely unknown, somebody made the pic with a phone and sent me years ago?

Sorry but it is impossible to find the source.

I still have no idea.

Chris

@This1s3mpire: You mention that the image is from Facebook. Regards, Yann (talk) 07:40, 23 July 2019 (UTC)

Image copyright problems with Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Walle8

Hi, Yann:

I've being trying to build this Wikipedia page: en:Reynold_Alexander. But have being having copyright problems with the images. What do we need to do to use the photos? We first tried using photos that where in the persons website and ask permission to use them, but we did not find any form for written consent to use them. We then try using pictures that where not used anywhere online and still had copyright problems. Can you please direct me on how is the correct way to use images.

Thanks in advance, — Preceding unsigned comment added by Walle8 (talk • contribs) 14:56, 23 July 2019 (UTC) (UTC)

@Walle8: Hi,

Who is the photographer? Who is the copyright holder? For images not directly created by you, the copyright holder has to send a permission for a free license by email. Please see COM:OTRS for the instructions. Also these images are very small and have no EXIF data. Why not uploading the original files? Regards, Yann (talk) 16:32, 23 July 2019 (UTC)

Recent deletions

Hello there,

You posted a warning, along with three deletion notices on my talk page, so I wanted to reach out to you about them.

1. You deleted two images that I uploaded years ago and nothing had been said about them. Was there a reason for that?
2. Official Photo of Archbishop Elpidophoros of America.jpg is from the Official Archdiocese Website. That is his official photo, so then under which license would I have uploaded that with?
3. Your warning has some language that I find a bit putting off, and a bit inaccurate. You have done so despite requests from editors not to do so, and despite their instructions. For clarification as #2 mentions, I wasn't sure on which license to use. Also the only other issue of me uploading an image was nearly four years ago, and that is the only editor aside from you. Your warning with the language it accompanies almost paints the image of me being a reckless editor and uploading with no regard.
4. You deleted Official Photo of Archbishop Elpidophoros of America.jpg almost immediately, yet have left the other two images as they are, and they have been for years now.

I understand you have a task, but with the language you've communicated with, it's putting off to someone with a circumstance like this and so I'd like some clarification.

I look forward to your response. --Giooo95 (talk) 04:35, 24 July 2019 (UTC)

@Giooo95: Hi,

For the photos, you need a formal written permission from the copyright holder.

The paintings may be OK, if they are old enough (the artist should be dead for more than 70 years), but the license is wrong. Otherwise, you need a permission from the artist. Please see COM:OTRS for the instructions. If you have no permission, these files are copyright violations. Regards, Yann (talk) 04:55, 24 July 2019 (UTC)

@Yann: Hello,

I appreciate you writing back. However, your reply back skips over the verbiage used in your warning that you issued. I understand they are templates, however templates can and should be changed based on the history and the communication between the recipient and the issuing party. I await your response. --Giooo95 (talk) 05:03, 24 July 2019 (UTC)

@Yann: Hello, I await your response. --Giooo95 (talk) 04:59, 25 July 2019 (UTC)

Structured Data - testing other statements

You can now test using other statements for structured data on the file page on Test-Commons. Some datatypes are not yet available, such a coordinates, but further support will be extended soon. You can find more information about testing on the SDC talk page. The team looks forward to your feedback. -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 16:41, 24 July 2019 (UTC)

File:Logo Corpo di Polizia Locale Roma Capitale.jpg

Hi, thank you for your msg. You can delete this upload (Logo Corpo di Polizia Locale Roma Capitale.jpg).

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Luca — Preceding unsigned comment added by Geroluke (talk • contribs) 03:02, 25 July 2019 (UTC) (UTC)

 Done Yann (talk) 03:02, 25 July 2019 (UTC)

File:Nastrino Ufficiali SME Stato Maggiore Esercito.jpg

About this upload (Nastrino Ufficiali SME Stato Maggiore Esercito.jpg) I don't understand why I can't upload it. It's in a lot of militar websites without copyright. In any case if I take a photo of it, is it possible to publish it? Otherwise you can delete it.

Thank you

Luca — Preceding unsigned comment added by Geroluke (talk • contribs) 03:07, 25 July 2019 (UTC) (UTC)

@Geroluke: Hi,

Yes, it is possible to upload only if you take the picture yourself. Regards, Yann (talk) 03:07, 25 July 2019 (UTC)

National Peasants' Party logo

Do you have any further licensing concerns with File:Logo PNȚ Biblioteca de informație cetățenească 1933.svg? The approval of this DYK nomination is on hold until we have a resolution. Thank you in advance for a prompt reply. Flibirigit (talk) 20:57, 24 July 2019 (UTC)

@Flibirigit: Hi,

At this point, I will assume that the uploader is the author, as claimed. Regards, Yann (talk) 03:09, 25 July 2019 (UTC)

Thank you for the reply.Flibirigit (talk) 03:20, 25 July 2019 (UTC)

Question

Do you know why we have both Category:Photographs_by_Eva_Rinaldi and Category:Photographs_by_Eva_Rinaldi_(check_needed)?

https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Category:Photographs_by_Eva_Rinaldi_(check_needed)&action=history seems to say it was started by a User:Russavia. I went to their user talk page seeking an explanation, and learned you blocked them. Do you have any idea why the images in the category need to be checked? Do you know what someone thought they should be checked for? Geo Swan (talk) 06:12, 25 July 2019 (UTC)

@Geo Swan: Hi,

Russavia was banned by the WMF. Now I don't know why these images particularly should be checked. There are already license reviewed, as far as I can tell. Regards, Yann (talk) 08:47, 25 July 2019 (UTC)

Status of File:शिल्पकार चरित्रकोश - खंड ४ - न्यायपालिका, प्रशासन, संरक्षण.pdf

Hi, I want to know the status of this file uploaded by @QueerEcofeminist: . The organisation/publishing house has contacted me for facilitating re-licensing of other volumes of encyclopedias. If we know the problem with this upload, will resolve it first. Thanks, --सुबोध कुलकर्णी (talk) 11:51, 25 July 2019 (UTC)

Violates copyrights by uploading my own made pictures???

Dear Yann, honestly I do not understand the notice of deletion of the referenced images. I made the photos I uploaded, I thought that by uploading them and giving up/released my copyright, I could improve the wikipedia standard. If someone is discriminating on Wikipedia, it's not me. I suppose that should be the issue, since the gentleman's origin in the picture is Jewish ... I honestly don't know what to do with the deletion message and the threat that if I continue to upload my self-made photos, I will lose my editing rights. Is this a threat??? I am eagerly expecting an answer as to what kind of law, policy or rule I violate(d) with uploading of exclusive self-made photographs on wikipedia. I remain cordially:Mrandrew16 (talk) 17:19, 25 July 2019 (UTC)

@Mrandrew16: Hi,

You have a long list of copyright violations. Just taking the last deleted files, i.e. File:Miklós Hornok, captain of Hungarian Davis Cup team and his No.1 player Marton Fucsovics (2012).jpg, you copied it from another source, and you didn't provide a license.

Then could you please explain how you took File:Chanoch Nissany and Eddie Jordan.jpg and File:Paul Stoddart Bernie Ecclestone Chanoch Nissany.jpg? You mention the date of 2005, and the EXIF data says it was taken with a en:iPad Mini, which didn't exist in that time. Regards, Yann (talk) 17:41, 25 July 2019 (UTC)

Dear Yann. Let's start the "long" list of allegedly copyright violations! This morning I talked to Peter Zador by phone (Peter is one of my best friend), who made the photo of Miklós Hornok (captain of Hungarian Davis Cup team and his No.1 player Marton Fucsovics in 2012) and he authorized me to use his photo with very welcome on that site!!! I don't know what kind violation you talked about regarding this photo since I displayed that I am the representative of the owner who made that photo. Secondly, I was with Chanoch Nissany when he met Bernie Ecclestone and I DID THAT PHOTO on the Hungarian Grand Prix 2005 Friday morning, when Mr Nissany met Ecclestone in the Minardi motorhome! If you are still questioning any kind of competence and authority, please contact Mr Nissany and/or Mr Ecclestone and/or Mr Paul Stoddart, the that-time owner of Minardi team. As well as I was on present when Eddie Jordan met Chanoch Nissany in Silverstone during the testing in July, 2004 in Jordan Team headquarters, the photo was made downstairs. As I recognized, I made the only mistake of missing the right year (2004 instead of 2005), however I made already the correction. Please DO NOT ACCUSE anybody, including me without knowing the background and history of the referenced photos! I hope it would be sufficient information for you. Best regards, Mrandrew16 (talk) 19:37, 25 July 2019 (UTC)

@Mrandrew16: Sorry, but that's not how it works here. The copyright holder has to provide a formal written permission if they images were not directly taken by you. So please ask Peter Zador to do that. See COM:OTRS for the instructions. And these are not your images if you are not the photographer. Regards, Yann (talk) 04:31, 26 July 2019 (UTC)

PV Sindhu image

Dear Yann,

I work for India's leading sports marketing company Baseline Ventures (www.baselineventures.com) and we officially represent PV Sindhu. I wanted to make a change to her picture which was an old one and update it with the new one. While I have been trying to provide all copyright information, you have threatened to block me for copyright infringement. The picture is owned by our company and I was getting a mail sent as per your templates approving the usage of the picture. Please let me know what have I done wrong for me to be threatened in such a way?

Will wait to hear from you. Regards Varun Menon — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vroonmenon (talk • contribs) 10:14, 26 July 2019 (UTC) (UTC)

@Vroonmenon: Hi,

All documents which have been published elsewhere previously, or of which you are not directly the author, need a formal written permission. Please see COM:OTRS for the instructions. If the copyright holder is not the photographer, a proof of copyright transfer will be needed. Until we receive such a permission, they are considered as copyright violations. Regards, Yann (talk) 10:14, 26 July 2019 (UTC)

PS: Please sign your messages with ~~~~

Dear Yann, Will get the photographer to send a formal email granting us permission to use the image. Hope that will help and we can have the image restored? 10:20, 26 July 2019 (UTC)

Droit d'utiliser des photos de 1920 - place du Molard

Salut Yann. Pour fr:Kiosques_du_tramway_de_Genève#Place_du_Molard_1890s-1907-1953, photos regroupées dans Category:Kiosque_du_Molard_(Geneva), j'aimerais bien une photo correcte du kiosque construit en 1907. Il y a dans notrehistoire.ch ces deux photos : Place du Molard 1920 et Place du Molard 1920, des cartes postales sans références, aussi Genève, la place du Molard, Genève, la place et la station du Molard et [1] (Bibl. de Genève - Atelier Boissonnas, photographe). Qu'est-ce qu'il est possible de mettre sous Commons ? Quand une maison d'édition de cartes postales est mentionnée, faut-il attendre 70 ans après... sa disparition ? Conseils ? --MHM (talk) 11:49, 26 July 2019 (UTC)

@MHM55: Bonjour,

C'est un peu gênant quand la source prétend avoir un droit d'auteur sur la photo, à moins d’être sûr que l'auteur est inconnu. L’idéal, c'est de scanner les cartes postales soi-même, y compris, l'envers, pour prouver qu'aucun photographe n'est mentionné. Les images avec "Bibl. de Genève" comme source sont certainement OK.

Pour la licence, il vaut mieux utiliser {{PD-1923-anon}} que {{PD-old-70-1923}}. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 12:28, 26 July 2019 (UTC)

Warnings? What warnings

Dear, I send you the most sincere regards. I would like to complain not because I have deleted files that I uploaded, since I violated certain rules (which was unintentionally), and I understand it. But I feel that what has happened has been that everything was like an attack, because I uploaded two images, and I understand why they were deleted, but why did a massive deletion of my files begin? Honestly, it doesn't seem fair at all, since it's a mockery of my contributions to Wikipedia. After this, I doubt if I will continue contributing. A pity the truth.--Monteaguilino1 (talk) 16:06, 26 July 2019 (UTC)

@Monteaguilino1: Hi,

Five of your uploads were deleted as copyright violations. But a warning is just that: a warning. Don't do it again, and everything will be fine. By the way, could you please explain how you created File:Mapa Monte Águila.png? What source did you use? Thanks, Yann (talk) 16:18, 26 July 2019 (UTC)

Erase practice of Jbc

I am victim of this aggressive worker (a foto done by myself and given to the common has been erased by him). Who is the superior for him? And why isn't there an easy to understand complaint procedure?

Well, after some attempts, I succeeded to restore the foto. - But, nevertheless, Jbc is dangerous by his overwhelming engagement. I would like to recommend some disciplinary means or further education to moderate him.

L-scriptor (talk) 18:36, 26 July 2019 (UTC)

@L-scriptor: Hi,

After some research, I guessed that you were talking about File:Oberschlesische Stahlwerksgesellschaft, Neue Grünstr 17 18.JPG. If you have a complain about an editor, COM:ANU is the right forum.

I see that you uploaded old pictures. At least some of them could be accepted, but you didn't provide enough information, or the license was wrong. For old anonymous images, {{PD-anon-1923}} is the right license. Please provide as much information as possible, including the source, the author, and the details about the (probable) first publication, as this is what matters for the copyright. Regards, Yann (talk) 04:20, 27 July 2019 (UTC)

Redundant right

Hi Yann. Can you remove the redundant AP right of Sandro Halank and P right of とある白い猫? 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 02:42, 27 July 2019 (UTC)

 Done Yann (talk) 03:55, 27 July 2019 (UTC)

File:Shri Shrikant Bhartiya .jpg

I am the owner of the picture File:Shri Shrikant Bhartiya.jpg this and all the other pictures available on his website www.shrikantbharatiya.com are clicked by me. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Indivar Bhatia1 (talk • contribs) 08:58, 27 July 2019 (UTC) (UTC)

@Indivar Bhatia1: Hi,

If you are the photographer, please upload the original unmodified image from your camera. Otherwise, an OTRS permission is needed. Regards, Yann (talk) 08:58, 27 July 2019 (UTC)

Alberto Escámez

Buenos días, he visto el mensaje de que falta la licencia referente a la foto que publiqué en la página Alberto Escamez. Esa foto no tiene licencia porque la realicé yo.

Un saludo. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jesustrompaenfa (talk • contribs) 10:28, 26 July 2019 (UTC) (UTC)

@Jesustrompaenfa: Hi,

File:Francisco-grau-dirige.jpg was copied from another page, and you didn't provide a license.

File:Alberto Escamez (centro) cuando dirigía la Unión Musical Torrevejense. Año 1958.jpg is a derivative work. You need the permission from the original photographer. Regards, Yann (talk) 10:32, 26 July 2019 (UTC)

PS: Please sign your messages with ~~~~

Buenas tardes Yann la foto de :File:Alberto Escamez (centro) cuando dirigía la Unión Musical Torrevejense. Año 1958.jpg al subirla no mencioné al autor porque falleció, si puedo lo editare, si no te pido por favor si es posible hacerlo tu. Lo hizo un fotógrafo antiguo de mi pueblo llamado Darblade. Un saludo.Jesustrompaenfa (talk) 14:02, 28 July 2019 (UTC)

User Santiago RD

Hi! You have earlier warned user Santiago RD about removing deletion requests here. Today they have removed deletion-templates from a large number of pages (but not all) that have been nominated for deletion here. At the same time they have been recreating almost all pages that were deleted in the former request here. They never communicate in talk pages and they never use edit summaries, so it is impossible to communicate with them, but it seems obvious that all the flags they produce are fictitious. Hope you can help, at least to roll back all of today's edits. I feel I am fighting against windmills... Regards! --TU-nor (talk) 16:35, 28 July 2019 (UTC)

Addition: I have also alerted Sealle, who was the editor deleting the old batch of fake flags a week ago. Regards! --TU-nor (talk) 16:56, 28 July 2019 (UTC)

Category:David_Birkin

David Birkin has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Naturiss (talk) 18:18, 28 July 2019 (UTC)

Vandalism

Hi Yann. Can you please protect pages in my user namespace? 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 14:55, 29 July 2019 (UTC)

Derechos reservados de CDF

Hola Yann, quiero hacerte una pregunta. ¿Puedo subir contenido desde la página cdf.cl? en este sitio existen imágenes de su propiedad que pueden ser usados en Wikipedia. En este apartado hay una pauta para poder subir las imágenes. ¿Se puede hacer? --Diego B91 (talk) 19:21, 29 July 2019 (UTC)

Checking back in on upload

Hi, following up on [this] discussion. I was wondering if you were every able to upload De la Filosofia de las Armas y de su Destreza y la Aggression y Defensa Cristiana? I didn't see it at File:De la Filosofia de las Armas y de su Destreza y la Aggression y Defensa Cristiana - Jerónimo Sánchez de Carranza.djvu. -Furicorn (talk) 06:02, 31 July 2019 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:India-France 50 years of space co-operation.jpg

Yours sincerely, Eatcha (talk) 10:31, 31 July 2019 (UTC)

Sorry, My mistake. It's just the old wordpress template. Drupal template mentions this clearly. Best,Eatcha (talk) 15:28, 31 July 2019 (UTC)

Your photo on Repubblica

Your photo File:Taj Mahal, side view.jpg was used on https://www.repubblica.it/viaggi/2015/11/17/news/corte_suprema_indiana_niente_cremazioni_attorno_al_taj_mahal-127545100/ without attribution. This is one of the largest newspapers of Italy. Nemo 20:43, 31 July 2019 (UTC)

un-block me

Dear Yann, Please help me on how to properly upload images without a license. Don't refer to a page. Just give me simple steps. I am only a young boy & am new to this. Please help me. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jgwilliams873 (talk • contribs) 03:24, 1 August 2019 (UTC) (UTC)

@Jgwilliams873: Hi,

You are not currently blocked. You have to read some policies if you want to contribute here. Regards, Yann (talk) 03:24, 1 August 2019 (UTC)

PS: Please sign your messages with ~~~~

SD

I believe File:Fa91af99.gif should be speedied as self-harm/violence. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 14:03, 1 August 2019 (UTC)

 Done I am also reporting this to Trust & Safety. Thanks for noticing. Yann (talk) 14:06, 1 August 2019 (UTC)

Image uploaded in error

Hi Yann, I have overwritten an image by mistake. See https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:ROBIN_HOOD_Clipper_ship_sailing_card_M2Y8069.jpg they are in fact two different files. Can you separate them please? or delete the revision and then i will upload the different file as a new one? Thanks. Broichmore (talk) 15:41, 1 August 2019 (UTC)

@Broichmore: Just reupload the older image separately. Regards, Yann (talk) 06:12, 2 August 2019 (UTC)

Rights

Hi Yann. Sorry to bother you but could you remove my redundant patroller right? Thanks. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 14:40, 2 August 2019 (UTC)

 Done Yann (talk) 14:42, 2 August 2019 (UTC)

Chunk upload not working

Hi Yann, please see the discussion here. I am facilitating this re-licensing process. User is trying to upload the complete books using chunk upload tool. But it is not working. User has done it successfully for - File:शिल्पकार चरित्रकोश - खंड ४ - न्यायपालिका, प्रशासन, संरक्षण.pdf, File:शिल्पकार चरित्रकोश खंड ५ - कृषी, पशुसंवर्धन.pdf. Could you please guide how to go about?
--सुबोध कुलकर्णी (talk) 07:48, 3 August 2019 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/File:6000.png.jpg

Hello Yann,

See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Amit offir logo final 2.png - Israeli law does not subscribe to the "sweat of the brow" doctrine.. -- Geagea (talk) 07:28, 1 August 2019 (UTC)

@Geagea: Hi,

Sorry, I don't understand what you mean. File:Amit offir logo final 2.png is too complex for PD-textlogo (specially the human figure), while File:6000.png.jpg is simple enough. Regards, Yann (talk) 08:33, 1 August 2019 (UTC)

Well, first there is no de minimis in logos of Israel and as far as I understant from user Deror avi (lawyer from Israel) threshold of originality is very low and it is not ok for most (all?) logos.-- Geagea (talk) 09:30, 1 August 2019 (UTC)

@Geagea: Well, the threshold of originality may be low, but there must be one. Simple geometric figures can't have a copyright. Feel free to reopen it, if you think PD-textlogo is not OK. Regards, Yann (talk) 09:33, 1 August 2019 (UTC)

@Deror avi: , opinion - File:6000.png.jpg. -- Geagea (talk) 20:49, 3 August 2019 (UTC)

File:Flag of Puerto Rico.svg

Hi Yann. Could you remove the en caption from File:Flag of Puerto Rico.svg? 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 13:26, 13 August 2019 (UTC)

@大诺史: Why can't you do it yourself? Regards, Yann (talk) 17:35, 13 August 2019 (UTC)

It’s auto locked because it’s used on wikinews. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 00:11, 14 August 2019 (UTC)

Foto's artikel Camp-let

• • Ik ben een beetje verrast door uw woordgebruik in deze. Bij het uploaden (binnen een kort tijdsbestek na elkaar) heb ik keurig de vragen beantwoord waar de foto's vandaan kwamen en hierbij heb ik aangekruist dat ik de foto's van internet heb gehaald en NIET wist of deze foto's al dan niet beschermd waren etc. Nu verwijt u mij dit. Dan moet wikicommons de keuze niet geven toch? Neeroppie (talk) 11:19, 14 August 2019 (UTC)

• • goedemiddag Yann, inmiddels heb ik bericht van het bedrijf faltcaravaning.net inzake het gebruik van foto's van hun site voor het artikel op wikipedia. Hoe nu verder? wat moet ik aanleveren aan u zodat e.e.a goed komt? Neeroppie (talk) 12:41, 14 August 2019 (UTC)

Copyright violations

Dear Sir, It is said that I have uploaded several files that are copyright violations. But the files which I have uploaded are my own. The files are not taken from anywhere as they are not published yet. They have been taken from my personal library. Regards, Prodyut Kumar Deka 2001:4408:4401:1F:4A1A:6980:3198:412F 05:40, 16 August 2019 (UTC)

Hi, Could you please log in before writing here? Thanks, Yann (talk) 05:45, 16 August 2019 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_uploaded_by_Formosa_loves_river

Hi, these photos are made by myself. --It's gonna be awesome!#Talk♬ 16:14, 31 July 2019 (UTC)

@It's gonna be awesome: Hi,

These are derivative works of satellite images, so you are not allowed to do that unless the source images are free. And you have to prove that with a source. In the absence of information, these are presumed copyright violations. Regards, Yann (talk) 16:25, 31 July 2019 (UTC)

They're free. ref. --It's gonna be awesome!#Talk♬ 16:27, 31 July 2019 (UTC)

Well, I don't read Chinese, but 版權所有 © 2008-2019 QGIS is translated by Google as Copyright © 2008-2019 QGIS. Regards, Yann (talk) 16:31, 31 July 2019 (UTC)

It took me some time to refine the satelite image from several black & white raw image into the colorful pictures. The raw data were provided by NASA which were some open source raw images. I then followed the steps taught from the Ref and successfully converted them to some useful and readable images. You can just search Google and realize I was the first uploader. --It's gonna be awesome!#Talk♬ 16:35, 31 July 2019 (UTC)

I can show you one of the procedures of my work in a snapshot if you need. --It's gonna be awesome!#Talk♬ 16:40, 31 July 2019 (UTC)

Well.. I have to say that the deletion nomination should be re-opened or just be canceled. It looks like all those my work was deleted simply because "a person doesn't believe that those pieces of stuff could be made by an average person". Likewise, I will never doubt the legitimacy of your uploaded media simply because someone doesn't believe in your ability. I should not be judged guilty before proven innocent. Please feel free to leave me messages. Thank you. I wish Wikimedia being a place with no room for any kind of prejudice. Regards. --It's gonna be awesome!#Talk♬ 17:26, 31 July 2019 (UTC)

• Nominator comment: If you obtain the information from a governmental source, with a copyright "版權所有 © 2008-2019 QGIS " (which I guessed correctly it's a meterological agency) and enrich / process them, they are derivative. Yes, I did a google search, and you are the first uploader, but you aren't the first person which create the image which is still an non-free derivative which commons do not allow. Even if the raw data is from NASA, it has been processed by the agency in Taiwan which gives it some form of uniqueness which surpass the threshold of originality. There isn't any manner these files can be used on commons. @It's gonna be awesome: --Cohaf (talk) 18:01, 31 July 2019 (UTC)
  • That was just a website for educational purpose. My previous work wasn't just copied from the website. You can't find the same image anywhere else including the educational website. I would like to emphasize that I learned the abstract knowledge rather than just copied the physical proprietary objects from the website.--It's gonna be awesome!#Talk♬ 18:07, 31 July 2019 (UTC)
  • That educational website just provides the link to NASA to download the raw data concerning Taiwan. --It's gonna be awesome!#Talk♬ 18:13, 31 July 2019 (UTC)
    • Do you have proof of the NASA images being open source and in a license compatible with commons? And the exact source of the images? Using a method of a website that is copyrighted to extract information doesn't match. In addition, educational purpose may be compatible with local NFCC rules but not to what commons allows. I think the best way is to transfer the files to zhwp if they are willing to accept under NFCC rules. @It's gonna be awesome: --Cohaf (talk) 18:35, 31 July 2019 (UTC)
      • Here they are, 2, 3, 4 --It's gonna be awesome!#Talk♬ 03:29, 1 August 2019 (UTC)
      • What's NFCC? Also, we all learn skiils from some copyrighted textbooks, website, etc. That doesn't mean we can not build things on our own based on the knowledge gained from those copyrighted sources. --It's gonna be awesome!#Talk♬ 03:59, 1 August 2019 (UTC)
      • All ASTER data products are now available at no charge to all users. In a joint announcement by the US and Japan, the entire ASTER archive was opened to the public. Any scene, and all derived products, can be ordered by anyone., It is available online to users everywhere at no cost. , "This is the most complete, consistent global digital elevation data yet made available to the world,", "This unique global set of data will serve users and researchers from a wide array of disciplines that need elevation and terrain information.", The data will be distributed by NASA's Land Processes Distributed Active Archive Center at the U.S. Geological Survey's Earth Resources Observation and Science Data Center in Sioux Falls, S.D., and by METI's Earth Remote Sensing Data Analysis Center in Tokyo. Reference, Reference II --It's gonna be awesome!#Talk♬ 04:08, 1 August 2019 (UTC)

• The nomination was submitted by Cohaf (talk) at 05:44, 29 July 2019 (UTC) and was then closed by Yann (A) (talk) at 07:20, 29 July 2019 (UTC). We should all respect Procedural justice. --It's gonna be awesome!#Talk♬ 04:20, 1 August 2019 (UTC)

• • @It's gonna be awesome: NFCC means Non Free Content Criterion, see w:en:WP:NFCC. I will say the sources you give doesn't differ from the first you have given. Available at no charge doesn't mean no copyright nor allows for free use. And now you mentioned the sources are copyrighted, anything build up is derivative of copyrighted content. Any more discussions should be filed at commons request for undeletion, not here, but I don't think those files can be used at commons with unclear licensing. If you wish, you may contact OTRS if needed. --Cohaf (talk) 07:32, 1 August 2019 (UTC)
    • @Cohaf: Hi, I am back. Thanks for the participation. I learned the know-how from w:academia sinica's blog and built pieces of stuff upon NASA's materials which are open to the public. Hence, let me conclude, it has no way to constitute any kind of breach of anyone's copyright. Regards.--It's gonna be awesome!#Talk♬ 15:41, 1 August 2019 (UTC)
      • Here states that there isn't copyright for non commercial use for most of the files, however, for commercial uses (which commons images are to be) needs to obtain permission. Hence, it cannot be allowed here. @It's gonna be awesome: --Cohaf (talk) 17:11, 1 August 2019 (UTC)
        • @Cohaf: Hi, I think in this case, they're my original work developed upon NASA's raw data. It might not be the same as the scenario that someone directly uses NASA's stuff for commercial purpose. Regards. --It's gonna be awesome!#Talk♬ 18:22, 1 August 2019 (UTC)
• Hello Admin Yann, I was just hoping to see these pictures again. Could you just recover them a little, please? --It's gonna be awesome!#Talk♬ 08:59, 10 August 2019 (UTC)
• @Yann: Hi. I just re-uploaded the photo File:Landform_of_Formosa.png. Now you can believe that's really my work. Could you please recover them so I will have time to play with other stuff? Thank you! --It's gonna be awesome!#Talk♬ 16:26, 15 August 2019 (UTC)

• @It's gonna be awesome: Cohaf explained you above that the license at the source is not OK for Commons. Anyway, when you create a map, you need to explain what data or sources you used. Do not reupload deleted files, or you will be blocked. If you want to request undeletion, this is the right place. Regards, Yann (talk) 04:00, 16 August 2019 (UTC)

• Thanks for the reminder. I gonna add the source. --It's gonna be awesome!#Talk♬ 08:35, 16 August 2019 (UTC)
• Since I still don't find Cohaf's reason justifiable. I will be open to others' comments on this matter in the Commons:Undeletion_requests/Current_requests#Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_uploaded_by_Formosa_loves_river. Regards. --It's gonna be awesome!#Talk♬ 17:42, 16 August 2019 (UTC)

Upload "Kaqërotë/kaçërote" picture - license

• File:Albanian haircut "kaqërot".jpg

As far as I know this picture has no copyright at all.SKA-KSI (talk) 13:29, 15 August 2019 (UTC)

@SKA-KSI: Hi,

There is a copyright by default on all pictures, so you need to explain with the right license why this picture would be allowed. In this case, if the photographer is Paul Traeger, he has to be dead for more than 70 years. Regards, Yann (talk) 04:04, 16 August 2019 (UTC)

Thank you for your reply, Yann. That was my bad, I found this picture in an (onl.) article about highlanders and their tribal haircuts. Which I added as the source. Later I found the original photo, which was indeed from photographer Paul Traeger (added that also later) and it is also found on Robert Elise's website. Quote "you need to explain with the right license why this picture would be allowed"... (pls excuse my ignorance) but how? Regards, SKA-KSI (talk) 15:01, 16 August 2019 (UTC)

@SKA-KSI: Like I said, when did Paul Traeger died? Regards, Yann (talk) 15:05, 16 August 2019 (UTC)

File:Президент Приднестровья Вадим Красносельский в Оксфорде.jpg

А ничего, что на сайте Президента ПМР http://president.gospmr.org/ стоит лицензия - All content on this site is licensed under: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International и фотография была добавлена с сайта, соответствующая лицензия указана? Для чего тогда эта лицензия была указана к фотографии и источник на нее? Сами нарушаете правила? Можете прежде чем удалять, то стоит сначала зайти на сайт и посмотреть лицензию к фотографии было? Жду восстановление фотографии и извинений, что Вы администратор сами не соблюдаете правила, а удаляете просто так. Хоть фотографию заливал не я, но меня поражает Ваше отношение к файлам... Были указаны лицензии согласно правил, указан источник, на сайте стоит лицензия, а Вы взяли и удалили с причиной нарушение авторских прав... А то что сайтом Президента ПМР разрешено использовать фотографии и стоит на сайте лицензия Вам мало? Как минимум извинитесь перед тем, кто залил фотографию согласно всех правил, а Вы их нарушили. --Kodru (talk) 08:24, 16 August 2019 (UTC)

@Kodru: Hi,

I restored File:Президент Приднестровья Вадим Красносельский в Оксфорде.jpg, and created a DR instead. Please see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Президент Приднестровья Вадим Красносельский в Оксфорде.jpg. Regards, Yann (talk) 13:24, 16 August 2019 (UTC)

Political party logos

Hi Yann How can I upload the logos of political parties? Are they not in public domain? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pecetowy2 (talk • contribs) 10:37, 16 August 2019 (UTC)

@Pecetowy2: No, there are not in the public domain, but under a copyright by their respective creators. Regards, Yann (talk) 13:19, 16 August 2019 (UTC)

Copyright violations tag and deletion request

Hi Yann,

Hope you are well. In regards to the tag that you have left for me this morning. Yesterday was actually the very first time that I have noticed that there is some issues with the licence on some of the photos that I have uploaded in the past, sorry if there was some repeated mistake done, it's all unintentional. Couple of the photos have already been deleted by you last week, and few more are on the deletion request list now. I would highly appreciate if you can advice or help to resolve the problem with them because would be devastating to get those files deleted. I have already left a message with the Admin EugeneZelenko in regards to this issue as he actually put the mass deletion request yesterday. Hope we'll resolve the problem. Kind Regards, F00700I (talk) 08:55, 17 August 2019 (UTC)

Please tell me how to get a license

I got deleted the picture and also your warning regarding for the picture i've uploaded. I don't understand and need to know how can I get a license or prove to upload the picture.

Is it too complicate?

Can you send me the form and suggestion?

Best regards, — Preceding unsigned comment added by Eyesonannsirium (talk • contribs) 16:30, 17 August 2019 (UTC)

@Eyesonannsirium: Hi,

You can give a license only if you are the copyright holder, who is usually the photographer, or his/her employer. In other cases, you need a formal written permission from the copyright holder. Please see the instructions for this case. Regards, Yann (talk) 17:10, 17 August 2019 (UTC)

Help

Hi Yann. Could you take a look at the uploads of Yaitz331? His uploads such as File:Battle of Parilem 1.png and File:Battle of Yultab - 3. Night 1.png seems to fall out of com's scope. But I don't want to DR this just because I think that this is out of scope. Views? 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 14:24, 12 August 2019 (UTC)

Hi, We need the source of the background. Regards, Yann (talk) 05:58, 13 August 2019 (UTC)

The backgrounds are made by me, in QGIS. If you need proof, I can send you the files before anything was added. Could you remove the "Derivative Work" from them? Yaitz331 (talk) 13:03, 14 August 2019 (UTC)

@Yaitz331: Could you please explain that in the description, with eventually a link to the data used? Thanks, Yann (talk) 10:50, 15 August 2019 (UTC)

OK, added. Now can you remove the tags? Thanks. Yaitz331 (talk) 18:39, 18 August 2019 (UTC)

@Yaitz331: Is there a link to the data? Regards, Yann (talk) 07:26, 19 August 2019 (UTC)

I got the height data from terrain.party, and put that in the description.Yaitz331 (talk) 08:12, 19 August 2019 (UTC)

 Done Yann (talk) 08:33, 19 August 2019 (UTC)

Copyright violation

Hi Yann. Thanks for the email about copy rights violation. I have requested approval from CET, to use all the images I uploaded. They verbally agreed and will send a formal email to me with that approval. Will this suffice? I understand I have a week to clarify all this?

Thanks Ayal Gersh ayalgersh on Wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ayalgersh (talk • contribs) 17:34, 18 August 2019 (UTC)

@Ayalgersh: Hi,

The permission validation can take some time. Do you have the ticket number? Regards, Yann (talk) 07:23, 19 August 2019 (UTC)

Hi,I don't see any ticket number - where do I see the ticket number?. I'm referring to the files I've uploaded and they were approved by CET, they are now working on writing the approval letter in English. Please do not remove these from the page as this will approve very soon by them. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ayalgersh (talk • contribs) 07:30, 19 August 2019 (UTC)

@Ayalgersh: You will get the ticket number if you are in copy to the permission email. Regards, Yann (talk) 07:33, 19 August 2019 (UTC)

PS: You don't need to ping me on my own talk page.

I was not copied on the permission email. When I get the letter from CET (www.cet.co.il) who do I need to email it to? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ayalgersh (talk • contribs) 08:04, 19 August 2019 (UTC)

@Ayalgersh: The copyright holder must send the permission directly to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org. Ask them to be in the copy, so you will be informed. Regards, Yann (talk) 08:30, 19 August 2019 (UTC)

Copyright

Yann, I've uploaded the files with permission from the author who is also the subject of the photos. I've done this in Wiki Commons and have sent an email to Commons to approve these photos as a representative of the copyright holder. I believe I've done everything correctly. It has been incredibly frustrating trying to get these up, so if you have any advice on how to do that more effectively I'd love to hear it. Cheers, tbc32 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tbc32 (talk • contribs) 16:52, 19 August 2019 (UTC)

@Tbc32: Hi,

Do you have the ticket number? Regards, Yann (talk) 17:38, 19 August 2019 (UTC)

Yeah, the ticket is ticket:2019081810004583. They told me that permission from the subject wasn't enough (even though he owns the photos) so I'm trying to get the photographers permission, or get them listed on a CC sanctioned wordpress site. I'll keep you posted. Tbc32 (talk) 01:19, 21 August 2019 (UTC)

A beer for you!

спасибо за помощь планирую нормальную страницу на вики сделать кафе фанкони, а то разные бродяги пишут чепуху всякую спасибо Sergvoronenkov (talk) 12:09, 20 August 2019 (UTC)

Copyright Status

Hello.

By the looks of your talk page, you already get loads of messages about this kind of stuff. I'll try to make this quick.

One of the files I uploaded was missing its Copyright status. You respectfully warned me about this issue. Less than 5 minutes after the warning, the file was deleted. I did intend to add the {{PD-text logo}} tag to it, but I never got my chance. The deletion summary said the file was a copyright violation. If the file was in fact copyrighted, I apologize. I've seen many other logos with {{PD-text logo}} tag and thought the file I uploaded would fit the requirements.

Out of curiosity, if I had immediately applied the {{PD-text logo}} tag, would it have been deleted as fast? I know I don't own the work, but I doubt the uploaders of all the other logos did either.

--Diriector Doc (talk) 22:41, 20 August 2019 (UTC)

@Diriector Doc: Hi,

I am one of the most active admins, so yes, I get feedback. I suppose you are talking about File:Gamepedia logo.png. This appears too complex to be {{PD-textlogo}} to me. If you disagree, please ask on COM:UDR. For File:Algs.png, please indicate the source, date, author, and a suitable license, otherwise it will be deleted. Regards, Yann (talk) 06:25, 21 August 2019 (UTC)

Multiple copyrighted uploads

Yann, I recently dealt with copyrighted content copied from the school's website at en:Cambridge School Srinivaspuri by Csnp (talk · contribs) and Deepanshi.82 (talk · contribs). Both users have uploaded multiple school-related images on wikipmedia commons and marked them as "Own work". A spot check indicates that the images uploaded by Csnp may indeed be their property (or, rather that the user is working on behalf of the school). However, the images uploaded by Deepanshi.82 appear to be just taken from the school's website (eg this page) with no indication of permission or access to the original resolution files. For example File:Csnp-med.jpg is a copy of this; File:Csnp-chemistry Lab.jpg is copy of this etc.

Ronhjones has dealt with some of this in the past but appears to be inactive at the moment. I am loath to search for corresponding images for each of Deepanshi.82's uploads and tag them individually. Is there a more efficient way to deal with this? Abecedare (talk) 22:00, 19 August 2019 (UTC)

Hi, I deleted a few Facebook files. Other small files are nominated for deletion. Thanks for noticing. Regards, Yann (talk) 09:04, 20 August 2019 (UTC)

Thanks Yann. Abecedare (talk) 21:13, 21 August 2019 (UTC)

Re:Violaciones de los derechos de autor

Hola Yann. Comprendo que tenía una idea equivocada y se justifica la llamada de atención que he recibido, pero no comprendo por qué la parte del mensaje que dice "has ignorando nuestras peticiones de que ceses, e ignorando nuestras instrucciones. Si no dejas de subir archivos que no son libres, tu cuenta será bloqueada", todos los archivos que subí son previos a la primera notificación y desde entonces no he vuelto a subir ninguna imagen, si se suponía que yo mismo debía borrarlas nunca se me dijo, pero como sea, después que me dijo no volví a subir imágenes y por extensión no puedo haber ignorado algún tipo de petición. --Oniichan (talk) 04:22, 22 August 2019 (UTC)

OK, I removed the last warning. Regards, Yann (talk) 06:49, 22 August 2019 (UTC)

Template:Indian Army

Template:Indian Army has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this template, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Huon (talk) 08:55, 22 August 2019 (UTC)

Explain the copyright issue, please

Hello Yann, talking about the File:ChrisMartin HockeyClubTeamAtSherborneSchool.jpg... I have a personal email from the person in charge of the Sherborne School Archives (oldshirburnian.org.uk) where she told me that all of the images there are free to be used but she didn't respond about the use of a copyright license yet. What can I do on the file to fix the problem? I would truly appreciate your orientation, please. (Sorry for my bad english) —Thebeehive42 (talk) 15:28, 21 August 2019 (UTC)

@Thebeehive42: Hi,

What language do you speak?

The copyright holder has to send a permission for a free license to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org. Please see COM:OTRS for the instructions. Regards, Yann (talk) 19:48, 21 August 2019 (UTC)

@Yann: Hi, I speak spanish.

Ok, that's exactly what I thought at first, so I sent her the link for it yesterday, can you give a little bit more of time until she can send the permission, please? Besides, there's no problem that she labels it as Public Domain on the https://creativecommons.org/choose/mark/? Regards, Thebeehive42 (talk) 21:30, 21 August 2019 (UTC)

@Thebeehive42: It is better to use CC-0. Regards, Yann (talk) 03:33, 22 August 2019 (UTC)

Okay, can you give me a little more of time until she sends the permission? Can you please take off the warning from the file at least for now? Regards, Thebeehive42 (Update: I'll delete the file for personal privacy infringement, there's a musician tagged in its youth and they didn't want it uploaded. Thanks anyway and I'm sorry for the bother) (talk) 15:07, 22 August 2019 (UTC)

@Thebeehive42: Are you talking about File:ChrisMartin HockeyClubTeamAtSherborneSchool.jpg? It says they are a Hockey Club Team, not musicians, so I am confused. Regards, Yann (talk) 17:12, 22 August 2019 (UTC)

Yes, that's the one I'm talking about. It says that they are a Hockey Club Team, but the year the photo was taken is 1995. It's a hockey club, yes, but right below are listed the names of the players on the photo, there's Chris Martin, the british musician when he was younger studying at Sherborne School, so she explained to me that they want to respect the personal privacy of its former alumni and I couldn't be more agree. Thanks, Thebeehive42 (talk) 17:40, 22 August 2019 (UTC)

@Thebeehive42: OK, done. PS: You don't need to ping me on my own talk page. Regards, Yann (talk) 07:24, 23 August 2019 (UTC)

Ok Yann, thank you so much. Would you please take off the warning where it says I could be permanently blocked for copyright? I won't upload more files in a long time. Thebeehive42 (talk) 12:34, 23 August 2019 (UTC)

 Done Yann (talk) 10:22, 24 August 2019 (UTC)

Logo 40 millions d'automobilistes

• File:Logotype de l'association 40 millions d'automobilistes.png

Bonjour,

Ce logo que j'ai inclus cette nuit dans l'infobox de l'article 40 millions d'automobilistes a été supprimé pour violation de copyright.Sur ma PDD SUR cOMMONS, un message a été posté par 大诺史 indiquant comme problème : COM:CSD#F4.

Mon niveau d'anglais dans ce domaine étant très limité, je ne sais pas trop ce qui cloche : ai-je mal renseigné quelque chose lors de l'upload de l'image.

Il s'agit bien du logo de l'association, et on voit de nombreux logos sur Wikipedia francophone, pour d'autres associations, des constructeurs automobiles, etc.

Cdt SRLVR (talk) 09:31, 24 August 2019 (UTC)

@SRLVR: Bonjour,

Il faut l'autorisation du détenteur des droits d'auteur pour publier ce logo sur Commons. Vous pouvez importer le logo localement sur Wikipedia en français en suivant ces règles : fr:Wikipédia:Exceptions au droit d'auteur. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 10:20, 24 August 2019 (UTC)

Merci pour la réponse rapide, et désolé pour la "fausse manip". Je vais regarder comment faire cela. Bonne journée ! SRLVR (talk) 10:25, 24 August 2019 (UTC)

Delete request

Hello Xann this is a User with a abusive Username and is only active for abuse see delete edits--WikiBayer (talk) 11:31, 24 August 2019 (UTC)

@WikiBayer: This may be a valid reason for a block, but we don't delete talk page anyway. The 2 deletion requests were correct, so in what way this user name is abusive? Regards, Yann (talk) 11:35, 24 August 2019 (UTC)

Name is Susi and fotze is a German word for Cunt--WikiBayer (talk) 11:40, 24 August 2019 (UTC)

OK, I blocked the account. I don't speak German, so I couldn't know. Next time, please report of COM:ANU. Thanks, Yann (talk) 12:02, 24 August 2019 (UTC)

Not a copyvio

Please restore File:Screenshot of Google Images search for 'Daguerreotype ' - 2019-04-01.jpg, which was not regarded as a copyvio when I asked on the copyright noticeboard. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 20:31, 24 August 2019 (UTC)

Hi, OK, I restored it, and created a DR instead. The images themselves are obviously OK. There is a little uncertainty about the arrangement and the interface. Regards, Yann (talk) 02:20, 25 August 2019 (UTC)

Deletion of images without any basis

Good day, 19 Sept, the following images and their pages have been removed, ALTHOUGHT there was not any copyright issues. This is a hussle and I do not understand why that is the case when there is literally no problem with the images and their rights, the owner gave permission for them to be used. YES written permission to wiki and uploaded both of them. Please explain the cause for the deletion of the images, here we see a few hours after document was published you deleted the page; https://prnt.sc/p07jz1 https://prnt.sc/p07jz1 Thank you, Ask https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Nineta2.jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Nineta1.jpg — Preceding unsigned comment added by AskWhy (talk • contribs) 02:27, 1 September 2019 (UTC)

@AskWhy: Hi,

These files are copied from the Internet, so they are copyright violations, unless you prove that you are the author. If that's the case, upload the original files from your camera, or send a permission via COM:OTRS. Regards, Yann (talk) 06:44, 1 September 2019 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/Files found with insource:cannes-aero-patrimoine.net

Bonjour Parrain, voir le problème auquel je suis confronté, explications données dans le cours de la discussion. Au passage peux-tu me dire comment supprimer le bandeau affublant le tableau du Creator ?--Caspien06 (talk) 17:11, 31 August 2019 (UTC)

@Caspien06: Bonjour,

C'est une situation complexe, car il y a plusieurs auteurs impliqués : l'auteur des images de fond, l'auteur des graphismes de premier plan, etc. Comme ces images ont été publiées auparavant, il faut que chacun d'eux apportent une confirmation par écrit d'une publication sous une licence libre. Et c'est très peu probable pour les images de fond, qui sont en vente sur Internet. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 20:14, 31 August 2019 (UTC)

Ça a été dit dans la discussion : Manu (Emmanuel Briot) a produit un mail d'autorisation de publication de ses oeuvres sous licence libre il y a plusieurs mois. Je l'ai envoyée à Commons administration qui m'ont donné un feu vert sous réserve de faire référence à l'illustration produite dans CASPWiki. D'où des copies de plusieurs illustrations de CASPWiki vers Commons, selon la formulation que vous notez dans celles-ci. Or il y a un mois, deux Utilisateurs ont mis des bandeaux de proposition de suppression sous prétexte que ces illustrations contenaient des fonds provenant d'une certaine banque de données qui n'avaient pas de copyleft. Comme par hasard ce genre d'opération a toujours lieu pendant les vacances rendant difficile de se justifier. J'ai quand même réussi à joindre Manu qui m'a dit que sa base n'était pas celle citée mais une autre, dont il payait les droits rendant ceux-ci libres de droit. J'ai produit ce mail dans la discussion. Et là plus rien ne s'est produit. J'ai alors créé un article sur Manu dans les Wikidata, doublé d'un dans les commons Creator. Et dans le wikdata j'ai mis dans une rubrique les deux références à ces mails d'autorisation. Puis j'ai envoyé le second mail aux Commons administrateurs, sachant que, comme ils sont peu nombreux de bénévoles, la réponse est longue à venir. Voilà où j'en suis et me suis décidé à demander l'aide d'un administrateur parrain. J'ajoute que je suis en contact avec la DirCom de Thales Alenia Space qui va me confirmer que, comme elle l'avait fait pour les illustrations de Manu, elle va mettre en oeuvre une procédure semblable pour les photos de satellites prises dans le Centre spatial de Cannes - Mandelieu (que vous pouvez découvrir dans CASPWiki) pour que Wikipédia puisse enfin être illustré de belles photos de satellites européens, ne laissant pas seule la Nasa pour le faire. Bonne nuit, bien cordialement. --Caspien06 (talk) 22:57, 31 August 2019 (UTC)

@Caspien06: J'ai ajouté le numéro du ticket dans les pages des images, et dans la demande de suppression. De cette façon, toutes les informations seront examinées en détail avant de prendre une décision.

Sur le fond : quand on achète des images à une agence, on n'obtient en général pas le droit de les rediffuser sous une autre licence. Seul le detenteur des droits d'auteur possède en principe ce privilège. Il y a peut-être une exception ici, mais il faut avoir une copie de l'accord entre Emmanuel Briot et l'agence. Je vais le lui demander. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 07:30, 1 September 2019 (UTC)

J'ai lu ton message envoyé à Manu. Je rappelle que dans son mail il a dit : j’utilise des arrières plan Istock photo je paye de abonnement mensuel ces images sont libres de droits. Mais maintenant il s'agit d'une autre banque de données. Travaillant pour le compte de Thalès, qui sont des gens sérieux, je pense qu'il doit être en règle. Mais attendons sa réponse. Bravo et merci pour le gros travail que tu as déjà fait. Je rappelle une "petite" demande : comment faire pour régler le problème du bandeau de Creator Manu?--Caspien06 (talk) 08:45, 1 September 2019 (UTC)

@Caspien06: Au vu des informations dont je dispose, je pense que Emmanuel Briot est mal informé sur les droits que lui donne la licence donnée par Shutterstock, qui utilise volontairement des termes ambigus. Le terme "libre de droit" n'a aucune valeur juridique, et ce n'est pas forcement la même chose que "domaine public". Canstockphoto ne fait que reproduire Shutterstock. Je ne trouve pas cette image, chez Istock, mais elle est aussi vendue par d'autres sites :[2], [3]. Une solution serait d'avoir une autorisation directe de l'auteur, Romolo Tavani. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 09:13, 1 September 2019 (UTC)

C'est bizarre car il y a des sites qui ont l'air de donner ces droits (Bienvenue sur Shutterstock : des images pour tous les projets, sans problème de licence), d'autres faisant payer!? Aujourd'hui dimanche, je laisse Manu tranquille et je lui envoie un mail demain à la première heure. Est-ce que tu peux être parrain aussi pour WP francophone et anglophone ?--Caspien06 (talk) 09:38, 1 September 2019 (UTC)

@Caspien06: Non, ces sites ne donnent que des droits d'utilisation, pas de diffusion. Honnêtement, je vais être de moins en moins disponible dans les jours et les semaines qui viennent, aussi je préfère ne pas m'engager. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 18:34, 1 September 2019 (UTC)

Oui, j'avis vu que tu devais être très pris. A quel autre administrateur puis-je m'adresser ?--Caspien06 (talk) 18:55, 1 September 2019 (UTC)

@Caspien06: Voila la liste des admins par langue : Commons:List of administrators by language. Tu as l'embarras du choix. ;oD Cordialement, Yann (talk) 18:59, 1 September 2019 (UTC)