User talk:Yann/archives 45

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search


Jan-Hendrik Pelz

Dear Yann, to our discussion: My name is Jan-Hendrik Pelz, one of my assistants is Balint Goldenstein. If he is doing a picture in my name, I have the copyright also like I would do the picture. Im working in a bigger studio and that's how it works. So, sure I can be subject of the picture and have the copyright. I have not so much knowledge here with wikipedia. but Balint Goldenstein told me there is a problem of erasing, so I created my own account. I can send you a copy of my passport or whatever you need, but to be honest, its not a good feeling if you tell me that I have now no copyright of my own picture! Please, I want a proof that I still have the rights about my own pictures! And if you would help me a bit, just to handle here, would be very friendly. I just want upload some pictures to complete the article about myself and my art, so that it is complete! Thank you and best Jan Hendrik

the picture File:Jan-Hendrik Pelz & Johanna Mangold, Zaubertrank, Performance 2018.jpg, got erased. Its made by myself. Whats wrong please? Thank you and best regards Jan-Hendrik Pelz Jan-Hendrik Pelz (Diskussion) 14:13, 26 March 2019 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jan-Hendrik Pelz (talk • contribs) 23:17, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Jan-Hendrik Pelz: Hi,
Since you are not the photographer, please send a permission for a free license to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org (see COM:OTRS for the detailed instructions), including a proof that the photographer transfered the copyright to you. Regards, Yann (talk) 22:38, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Request for undeletion of infographics 'Electoral Bonds for Political Party Funding in India' and 'Infographic on NOTA None of the Above'

Hi Yann, Thanks for your reply. Should I then start the submission of new .png files altogether? Will there be issues of copyright again? Basically can I start the whole process afresh for these files, or will I have to do things differently because a version of the files was already posted on wikimedia commons? Also, may I confirm the procedure with you once? I individually post each .png file and send the letter of permission to the specified email address and that's it, right? Thanks again! Kshiti — Preceding unsigned comment added by KayMish (talk • contribs) 09:58, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@KayMish: Hi,
Yes, you can upload the files in PNG format. You may add any information about the source(s) you used. Please ask if you have any more questions. Regards, Yann (talk) 22:40, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Johnabook

Hello, every picture that I have uploaded belongs to me and I own the full copyright. I have uploaded 3 pictures of Princess Vitarah and every single one of them has been removed and I don't understand why. I took the photos myself as I am her photographer and social media manager, and I own full rights to all the photos I have uploaded. I would never intentionally upload something I did not have the rights to.

I requested an undeletion and a user informed me that if an image is uploaded somewhere else before Commons then I have to show free license from where it was originally uploaded. Does this mean that I have to take a picture of Princess Vitarah and then upload it to Commons first before we post it anywhere else in order to avoid copyright confusion?

--Johnabook (talk) 19:36, 3 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Johnabook: Hi,
If a file has been published elsewhere before being imported here, a formal written permission is necessary. Please see COM:OTRS for the instructions. Altenatively, you can add a mention of a free license (CC-BY-SA-4.0) on the external source. Regards, Yann (talk) 20:36, 3 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Yann!!

You have a lovely picture of the Taj Mahal on Wikimedia and you mentioned if I would like to use the picture to email you so I am doing that. I am editing a commercial for the Taste of India here in America. I am pressed as the spot airs 4/12/19

Hopefully you can get back to me before then. Thank you so much

The link to the photo is File:Taj_Mahal_(Edited).jpeg — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kimberley Lambert (talk • contribs) 15:10, 5 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Kimberley Lambert: Hi,
Thanks for your message. I am glad that you would use my picture. Please credit me as "© Yann Forget / Wikimedia Commons / CC-BY-SA-3.0". Regards, Yann (talk) 15:18, 5 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Buddha deletions

Hi Yann, can you revert all changes to File:Buddha 1950s postcard.jpg and File:Buddha 1950s postcard 2.jpg?

  1. Whilst they are from the same photograph, they are from a different source and have different quality. I was unable to find a good resolution copy of the photo, so both are useful until that time.
  2. The border is part of the original scan, and is typical post card design, see File:Postcard of Lendava 1943.jpg, File:Postcard of Postojna 1943.jpg, File:1943 postcard of Kranj.jpg. Cropping the border removes the meaning of the file. Why ignore the template?

Duplicate deletion is clearly viewed differently, for example I tagged the following files File:Bundesarchiv Bild 146-1981-025-18A, Auschwitz, Luftaufnahme, fallende Bomben.jpg, File:Bundesarchiv Bild 146-1981-025-17A, KZ Auschwitz, Luftaufnahme.jpg, File:Bundesarchiv Bild 146-1981-025-04A, Auschwitz, Luftaufnahme.jpg.--BevinKacon (talk) 11:51, 6 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, OK, I restored the file, and created a DR instead.
Yes, the black border is part of the original, but it is useless for Wikimedia projects. Regards, Yann (talk) 12:36, 6 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Yann. You warned this editor last December about uploading copyvios, but that doesn't seem to have slowed them down and they've continued to uploaded logos inappropriately. -- Marchjuly (talk) 14:00, 10 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done Yes, long overdue. Thanks for looking. Regards, Yann (talk) 14:26, 10 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Besoin d'une affiche

Coucou, Il me faudrait cette affiche avec une licence libre... (c'est à la base un film américain...) Comment faire pour l'importer sur commons sans problème  ? Merci Datsofelija (talk) 15:39, 10 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Datsofelija: Bonjour,
C'est un film récent, l'affiche est donc encore sous droits d'auteur (et pour longtemps), et donc non acceptée sur Commons. Il est possible de l'importer localement sur Wikipedia en anglais avec les règles de "fair use". Généralement, cela dépend de chaque Wikipedia d'accepter ou non le "fair use". Cordialement, Yann (talk) 15:44, 10 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Merci de ta réponse mais je voulais l'importer sur le WP:FR... et ils n'acceptent pas vraiment le fair use. Donc il n'y a pas de possibilité du tout de l'importer sur commons ? Cette image ou une autre puisqu'il y a 3 affiches officielles... Datsofelija (talk) 15:47, 10 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Datsofelija: Pas possible sans autorisation. Désolé. Yann (talk) 15:52, 10 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Merci quand même. Datsofelija (talk) 15:57, 10 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pronunciation of Buttigieg

This is the source (press conference): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NT36PvjxbRA — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vital Transistor (talk • contribs) 13:48, 11 April 2019 (UTC) (UTC)[reply]

@Vital Transistor: Hi,
OK for the source, but what about the license? Regards, Yann (talk) 13:48, 11 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
File:Pather Panchali film poster.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Kailash29792 (talk) 09:02, 13 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Yann - DELETION

why you delete all of my OWN WOKS and paintings? About what reason? User:Loboda.linux works:

please give them back — Preceding unsigned comment added by Loboda.linux (talk • contribs) 10:49, 19 April 2019 (UTC) (UTC)[reply]

@Loboda.linux:
1. Please sign your post.
2. Use the "add section" to, so that your message gets at the bottom of the page.
3. As for all works previously published elsewhere, a formal written permission is necessary. In addition, your files are derivative works, so you are only allowed to publish them here with a permission of the original author. See COM:OTRS for the instructions. Regards, Yann (talk) 10:53, 19 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Regards, Yann (talk) 10:49, 19 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

RFA Support

Hi. Since I cannot edit on Commons:Administrators/Requests/Jeff G. 3 anymore, I wanted to reach out and thank you for your support on my recent RFA. Even though it didn't end the way I wanted, I appreciate your support.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 00:02, 20 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Velleda

Merci pour pour Velleda! Je n'oubli ,pas que je te dois un cauchemars mais le Musée est toujours en travaux. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:35, 20 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Create protection

I've never requested page protection on Commons before, but can something like this be semi-create protected? - FlightTime Phone (open channel) 14:55, 20 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, ✓ Done Yann (talk) 14:58, 20 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you :) - FlightTime Phone (open channel) 15:14, 20 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Barbier

Merci pour la nomination !--Jebulon (talk) 14:04, 21 April 2019 (UTC) -Je ne suis jamais contre les améliorations, et je n’ai plus d’amour propre d’auteur. Merci pour l’avis.--Jebulon (talk) 23:28, 21 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Fotografías eliminadas

Estimado

Las fotografias eliminadas de Category: Rodolfo Opazo las subí hace más de 2 años o 3 años. Como tú dices he tenido mas cuidado en subir cosas liberadas de derecho de autos. Espero nunca más volver a equivocarme, Muchas gracias --Historiadormundo (talk) 15:51, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Edgar Allan Poe, portrait photograph (daguerreotype "Annie").
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Valued Image Promotion

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Edgar Allan Poe, portrait photograph (daguerreotype "Annie").
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Valued Image Promotion

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Edgar Allan Poe, portrait photograph (daguerreotype "Annie").
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Valued Image Promotion

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Edgar Allan Poe, portrait photograph (daguerreotype "Annie").
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Review of images uploaded with valid license

Hello Yann, I am Adithya. I have uploaded several images of the judges of the Supreme Court of India with accordance to Government Open Data License - India (GODL) after consultation with you a few months back (https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Yann&direction=next&oldid=324336724#Clarification_on_the_extent_of_free_use_of_Images). But now another administrator has said that the license is not valid and the images are subject to deletion. Hence I ask you to intervene and solve the problem or else nearly 100 of my uploads will be deleted within a weeks time. Please visit my talk page for his notice to my uploads and my subsequent reply. I once again request you to save my uploads from deletion. Adithya pergade (talk) 16:57, 24 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Edgar Allan Poe, portrait photograph (daguerreotype "Annie").
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Valued Image Promotion

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Edgar Allan Poe, portrait photograph (daguerreotype "Annie").
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Please restore this image for which we now have an OTRS ticket Ticket#2019042410005836. Thanks in advance. Ww2censor (talk) 10:33, 25 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Ww2censor: ✓ Done Yann (talk) 10:49, 25 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Edgar Allan Poe, portrait photograph (daguerreotype "Annie").
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Valued Image Promotion

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Edgar Allan Poe, portrait photograph (daguerreotype "Annie").
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Thanks

Didn’t know those gadgets:tools existed. Appreciate your feedback. Dan arndt (talk) 14:31, 26 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleting a photo

The author has given permission. No copyright was not. --Takhirgeran Umar (talk) 20:52, 26 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Gae Liberati

Excuse-moi, Yann, je n'arrive plus à retrouver la page sur Nina de Padova que j'étais en train de préparer - j'ai fait beaucoup de modification dans les deux dernier jours, mais maintenant elle est à peu près définitive, et je ne voudrais pas perdre le travail fait... Merci beaucoup. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gae Liberati (talk • contribs) 06:52, 27 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Gae Liberati: Elle est ici : it:Utente:Gae Liberati/Sandbox. Il faut une autorisation pour File:Schermata 2019-04-25 alle 23.55.10.png. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 09:59, 27 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Images

Hi, Im sorry but Im still understanding how to proceed regarding permissions and so on. I have the permission from image owners, just dont know how to do it in the right way. Could you please guide me? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fcgaldino (talk • contribs) 13:29, 27 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Fcgaldino: Hi,
It is explained on your talk page here: User talk:Fcgaldino#File:IDEAsinger.jpg. The detailed instructions are here. The easiest way is to use Commons:Wikimedia_OTRS_release_generator. Alternatively, the images could be accepted if they are published with a mention of a free license (e.g. CC-BY-SA-4.0) on the owner's website. This is also faster, as there is always a long queue in OTRS. Regards, Yann (talk) 13:52, 27 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Photo de Nina de Padova.

Salut Yann. Finalement j'ai décidé d'éliminer la deuxième photo: je ne connais pas le nom du photographe, je n'ai aucune idée du propriétaire des droits d'auteur, c'est une photo d'il y a soixante ans et Dieu sait d'où elle vient. Penses-tu qu'on peut publier la page maintenant ? Merci pour ton aide. GL — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 109.41.3.233 (talk) 15:25, 27 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour,
Pourriez-vous vous loguer, et indiquer de quelle image vous parlez ? Yann (talk) 16:24, 27 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Excusez-moi, Yann, mais je viens de recevoir encore un fois la même notice sur le copyright - maintenant j'ai éliminé cette photo de la page, où est le problème? — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 109.41.3.233 (talk) 07:22, 28 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Yann, je m'explique mieux. Dans la page de Nina de Padova que j'ai rédigée j'avais chargé deux photos : la première (celle qu'y figure maintenant) n'a jamais crée de problèmes. La deuxième a été éliminée aussitôt. En croyant avoir fait une fausse manoeuvre, je l'ai rechargée, et à partir de là on a commencé à me demander l'autorisation pour le respect du copyright. Comme je n'ai aucune autorisation parce qu'il s´agit d'une vieille photo pour laquelle aucune information sur les propriétaires officiels n'est disponible, je l'ai éliminé de la page en laissant la première. Maintenant je ne comprends plus : c'est aussi la première photo à créer de problèmes de copyright ? Puisque si c'est ça le cas, svp éliminez cette photo de la page et procédez avec la publication. Excusez-moi, mais je ne suis ni un technicien du web ni un avocat, et je trouve extrêmement compliqué entretenir une conversation avec un système qui n'est pas trop user-friendly - à tous le moins si le user est très peu doué comme moi. Je voudrais tout simplement voir la page publiée, et il vaut mieux le faire sans photos que pas du tout. Merci pour votre compréhension. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gae Liberati (talk • contribs) 07:51, 28 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Gae Liberati: Bonjour,
Le fichier File:Nina de Padova.png a été supprimé car vous l'avez copié depuis Facebook sans donner une licence. Pour quelle raison cette image serait-elle acceptable sur Commons ? Pour les questions liées à l'article proprement dit, il faut voir sur Wikipedia. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 08:33, 28 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Maintenant, je vois que vous l'avez réimportée. Je l'ai renommée : File:Nina de Padova, 1970.png, et j'ai ajouté la licence. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 08:39, 28 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Restauration File:Service public d'électricité en France.jpg.

Bonjour. Le fichier File:Service public d'électricité en France.jpg est un document réalisé par mes soins suite à une interview le 19/04/19 effectuée avec Nicolas Chiron, responsable EDF de l'usine marémotrice la Rance. Je souhaite donc conserver ce fichier (il me semble qu'il respecte bien les consignes imposées par Wikimedia Commons). Cordialement,

MargotDEP — Preceding unsigned comment added by MargotDEP (talk • contribs) 14:42, 28 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@MargotDEP: Bonjour,
Avez-vous réalisé cette interview et ce document dans le cadre de votre travail ? Si c'est le cas, les droits d'auteur appartiennent probablement à votre employeur. Il serait préférable d'envoyer une confirmation par écrit via COM:OTRS/fr. Et il vaudrait mieux utiliser le format SVG (ou eventuellement PNG) pour ce type de document, ici la qualité est passable. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 14:59, 28 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nsmutte

See en:Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Nsmutte. Should block and carry on. I blocked them four days ago at Wikiquote as Kromiom. Same MO. Register an account on a random project, unredlink their user page and immediately post at the local administrator's noticeboard. GMGtalk 18:58, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, This account is already globally locked. What do you want me to do? Regards, Yann (talk) 19:02, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry. I meant Karandei. You had replied to the thread they started at COM:AN. But it looks like someone else blocked them two minutes after I posted here. GMGtalk 19:05, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I was just looking at this, but Elcobbola was faster. Regards, Yann (talk) 19:07, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Headings

What are you intending to do here? I was about to revert these as vandalism, but then I saw that it was you and I presume you have a good intention. Can you please explain these apparently weird edits with no clear summaries? - Jmabel ! talk 20:03, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I think short clear headers are much better to managge the whole page. Regards, Yann (talk) 03:30, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
But these headings give no idea at all what the person is asking about. Also (secondarily), normally there has been a strong tendency to leave the original questioner's header alone, sometimes even if it is barely literate. I'm a little worried where it will go if people start changing these arbitrarily. - Jmabel ! talk 05:07, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I did it many times, but OK, I won't do it now. Regards, Yann (talk) 06:28, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

I know you tried, and if you or I even thought of attempting to do what just happened, we'd probably be ... well, you know. Atsme Talk 📧 23:54, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

There is no need to remove any image in that document. Let them discuss. Regards, Yann (talk) 03:33, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Request

Please, restore this one: File:Ancient Mosul, a Yezidi shrine to the left and the Nouri Mosque minaret to the right.jpg. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 20:08, 1 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
I am pretty busy now. I will look at this later. Regards, Yann (talk) 11:54, 2 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Srsval

Dear Yann, please could you explain why you deleted File:Michele Renee Salzman.jpg? You linked to the Commons: Licensing Page, but I do not understand how this image was a violation of copyright when it was uploaded by the copyright holder. Thank you Srsval (talk) 13:41, 2 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Srsval: Hi,
According to the uploader, it is a copy from the University of California Website, so a formal written permission from the copyright holder (probably the photographer) is needed via COM:OTRS. No license was provided. In addition, this is very small, therefore not very useful. It would be much better to uplaod a large image, or even the original unmodified version from the camera. Regards, Yann (talk) 16:16, 2 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Dear Yann, thanks for getting back to me. The subject of the photograph is the copyright holder and leant the University of California the image. Just to check, surely the size of an image would not be reason enough for an image to be deleted? Thanks in advance, Srsval (talk) 20:20, 2 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Srsval: The copyright holder is the photographer, not the subject, unless a contract says otherwise. We need a proof for this. We could also accept it if it is published under a free license (e.g. CC-BY-SA-4.0) on the source website. Regards, Yann (talk) 04:16, 3 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Further questions

Good day Yann, i am new uses in WiKi, please help me understand. What rull was used administrator or reviewer when skipped this picture with CC0 license, but they is guard? -- NEO 22:08, 2 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@NeoKKV: This logo could be argued to be {{PD-textlogo}}. The manga character is under a copyright, and you need a permission from the copyright holder. Regards, Yann (talk) 04:30, 3 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Yann, I published this image because on wikipedia italia it is not available. What changes should I make? Ramon5201 00:26, 3 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Ramon5201: You need the permission from the copyright holder when you are not the creator. If you have it, please see COM:OTRS for the instructions. Regards, Yann (talk) 04:13, 3 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Just noticed that a user you had warned two months ago has uploaded a copyrighted image again (and as his own work as well—I have corrected the source parameter at the image's description template). Dimsar01 (talk) 18:18, 3 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Dimsar01: Blocked. When you tag a file for copyright violation, please inform the uploader. Thanks, Yann (talk) 05:16, 4 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Question

Hello Yann. How did you do that ? CalalC99 (talk) 09:25, 4 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@CalalC99: I reverted you because you misplaced your nomination, and deleted part of the text there. Please read the instructions. You have to add your nomination in the adequate section. Thanks, Yann (talk) 09:29, 4 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked a user

Sorry for my poor english. I use google to translate: You have disabled the user Zebra dog guy without restriction. => Using multiple accounts. This user has nominated my image "File:Berlin, Siegerehrung WLM 2016 NIK 4517.jpg" as QI. I would never have done it. But it was waved through. Question: Has one of the "multiple accounts" given the positive rating? Greeting --Nightflyer (talk) 21:52, 4 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Nightflyer: Hi,
I don't know. May be you could ask on Commons talk:Quality images candidates‎. You can write in German there. Regards, Yann (talk) 04:56, 5 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour, L'image est celle d'une pochette de disque 45 tours. Elle se trouve sur d'autres sites : https://www.discogs.com/fr/Parachutistes-Du-3%C3%A8me-RPC-Chants-De-Marche-Et-De-Bivouac/release/8587573 https://www.multi-collection.fr/disques-militaires-politiques/2173-disque-45-tours-chants-de-marche-et-de-bivouac.html https://fr.shopping.rakuten.com/offer/buy/2948720511/chants-de-marche-et-de-bivouac-mon-algerie-a-douce-france-rien-ne-saurait-t-emouvoir-marie-suzon.html

Comme les couvertures de livres, les pochettes de disques sont considérées comme libres de droits. Avez-vous un texte de loi qui interdit d'utiliser ces documents ? Cordialement. ThB — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 90.87.211.170 (talk) 10:51, 5 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour,
Non, ni les couvertures de livres, les pochettes de disques ne sont libres de droits (ce qui ne veut rien dire par ailleurs).
Comme tous les œuvres originales, ces documents sont soumis au droit d'auteur, jusqu’à 70 ans après la mort de l'auteur, ou pendant 70 ans après la publication si l'auteur est inconnu. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 13:40, 5 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Salut Yann, thank you for closing this. I think though you forgot a few images. Regards, De728631 (talk) 20:00, 6 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

OK, done. Thanks for noticing. Regards, Yann (talk) 04:16, 7 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion requests

Hello! In response to your warning about my deletion requests, I would like to clarify that I uploaded those pictures in 2006 (13 years ago) with the idea that Wikimedia Commons was just a free cloud service with unlimited space to upload photos, and that goes against the spirit and the mission of Wikimedia Commons. Also, as you can see, they have quite a personal character. I myself and my friends appear in those photos and I would like to have them deleted to protect our privacy. Thanks for your consideration. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Isra00 (talk • contribs) 15:41, 8 May 2019 (UTC) (UTC)[reply]

@Isra00: Hi,
OK, fine, but this is not a valid reason for a speedy deletion. That's why I moved them to regular deletion requests. Some may eventually be deleted, specially if not used, but you should better argue about your point in these DRs. Regards, Yann (talk) 15:41, 8 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
PS: Please sign your messages.

Vandalism

Hi. Can you please make a revdel on my TP? Merci beaucoup. --E4024 (talk) 16:43, 8 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Admin, will you kindly do something about my request? Thanks for an anwer. --E4024 (talk) 02:58, 9 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done Sorry, this escaped me. Regards, Yann (talk) 03:09, 9 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion requests

Hello! In response to your warning about my deletion requests, I would like to clarify that I uploaded those pictures in 2006 (13 years ago) with the idea that Wikimedia Commons was just a free cloud service with unlimited space to upload photos, and that goes against the spirit and the mission of Wikimedia Commons. Also, as you can see, they have quite a personal character. I myself and my friends appear in those photos and I would like to have them deleted to protect our privacy. Thanks for your consideration. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Isra00 (talk • contribs) 15:41, 8 May 2019 (UTC) (UTC)[reply]

@Isra00: Hi,
OK, fine, but this is not a valid reason for a speedy deletion. That's why I moved them to regular deletion requests. Some may eventually be deleted, specially if not used, but you should better argue about your point in these DRs. Regards, Yann (talk) 15:41, 8 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
PS: Please sign your messages.

Vandalism

Hi. Can you please make a revdel on my TP? Merci beaucoup. --E4024 (talk) 16:43, 8 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Admin, will you kindly do something about my request? Thanks for an anwer. --E4024 (talk) 02:58, 9 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done Sorry, this escaped me. Regards, Yann (talk) 03:09, 9 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Loves Earth France 2019 a commencé !

Bonjour ,

J'ai le plaisir de vous annoncer que la cinquième édition du concours Wiki Loves Earth en France est ouverte !

Le concours concernera 368 zones de toute la France, des parcs nationaux jusqu’aux réserves naturelles régionales englobant ainsi des paysages et biotopes variés.

Pendant le mois de mai, n'hésitez pas à mettre en ligne des photos de ces zones que vous auriez sur vos disques durs ou à vous rendre dans une zone concernée près de chez vous (à l'aide de la carte). Le règlement est disponible sur la page du concours.

Les plus belles photos seront sélectionnées par un jury national composé de commonistes, d'acteurs de l'environnement et de photographes professionnels. Un jury international constituera ensuite une sélection des meilleures photographies mondiales. Vous pourrez retrouver toutes les informations détaillées sur le site du concours


P.S. : si vous ne pouvez pas participer au concours cette année, faites passer le message autour de vous pour que de nouveaux et nouvelles photographes rejoignent l'aventure !

Bonne journée, Sarah Krichen WMFr (talk) 08:58, 9 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Yann. You've already deleted this same photo a few days ago as File:Jason haider.webp, but it's been uploaded by the same uploader again and still has the same issues. I was going to tag it again with {{Copyvio}}, but wanted to see if might be better to tag with {{Npd}} instead on the off chance that it might be the uploader's own work. -- Marchjuly (talk) 11:28, 10 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

As you can tell, the file has been deleted by another admin. Would you suggest {{Npd}} if it's by chance reuploaded again? -- Marchjuly (talk) 23:07, 11 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Toghrul Rahimli

Hi! I stumbled upon an image, which i think might be a PD photo. Please take a look: link. This is a promotional photo used to be sold with its envelope. You can see its price on it: Цена: 7 коп.

If it's possible to upload this file here, what templates would you recomment to use? Sincerely, --Toghrul Rahimli (talk) 07:35, 11 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Toghrul Rahimli: This looks like a recent image, so you need the permission from the copyright holder before uploading it here. Regards, Yann (talk) 11:31, 11 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

DRs

Your morning coffee from Turkey. :)

Hi there. Someone cut a chunk here; better corrected by an admin. --E4024 (talk) 23:54, 11 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

OK, fixed. Thanks for noticing. Regards, Yann (talk) 04:04, 12 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Many thanks, but your edit shows at page history minus 3.835 characters. I think you should look there again; it must be a "plus" edit. Regards. --E4024 (talk) 04:31, 12 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
OOPS, right. Thanks for the coffee, I need it. ;oD Yann (talk) 04:40, 12 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Request for removing the images that I have uploaded in Wikimedia Commons

Yann, I request you to help me remove the images that I have uploaded in the Wikimedia Commons. It is due to some personal legal issues that I need to get those images removed (also from being used under CC lisence). Please, it is my request. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sarthakm71 (talk • contribs) 05:45, 12 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Sarthakm71: CC licenses are irrevocable, so images are deleted only with a valid reason, and you didn't provide one. Regards, Yann (talk) 06:39, 12 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
PS: Please sign your messages.


Yann, please help me with the reason that I can provide that shall remove the images i uplpaded on Wikimedia commons. I have some legal issues that are not covered under the reasons provided for usage for delete request. Please help me. These are the image files I had uploaded -

The stones on the shores.jpg The Waves.jpg The Dusk.jpg The Shores.jpg Sea-shells.jpg — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sarthakm71 (talk • contribs) 09:42, 12 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Sarthakm71: Please read what I said above. Regards, Yann (talk) 11:31, 12 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Preview of images

Hi, just posting this here, as I'm not sure it's not just my browser or something. Perhaps you can tell me. Recently, when I click on an image to get a better look, it opens as a tiny thumbnail, and when I click on it again, it still does not go full size (it goes window-sized maybe). Anyone else report this? (I couldn't find it, but it's hard to describe I guess). Also, could you remove the personal information from Commons:Help_desk#logo_Univé - I'm sure the person would appreciate not getting random calls? I don't want to mess with it, not really active on the helpdesk... Thanks in advance for your help. -- Deadstar (msg) 21:04, 13 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Merci

Merci de m'avoir initié — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vincent Granouillac (talk • contribs) 05:12, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Vœux

Meilleurs vœux pour 2019 !
Hello Yann/archives 45,

Je te souhaite une année légère et joyeuse,
avec de belles et gratifiantes contributions !
Au plaisir de te recroiser,
Cordialement,
— 
Racconish💬 1 janvier 2019 à 13:21 (CET)

MiguelEspiau

Perdona, no entiendo muy bien el funcionamiento de la página. No parece nada lógico. No entiendo que los avisos los pueda editar o borrar cualquier usuario. De cualquier forma, no los quitaré, pero si no se deben quitar no debería de existir la opción de editarlos. Es absurdo.

Segundo: las imágenes y textos por los que se me denuncia, han sido subidos por mí a la web de la que se me acusa d eplagio en el artículo de la wikipedia que he editado. Yo soy el gestor y editor de la web https://fedv.es y todo el contenido que en ella hay ha sido subido y editado por mí. No entiendo por qué ese mismo contenido que he subido yo, no lo puedo compartir y subir también a un artículo de la wikipedia.

Solicito se retiren los avisos, y se restituya el artículo por mí editado. He mandado un correo desde la dirección de la FEDV para que la wikipedia corrobore que soy el propietario y editor de los textos que allí se alojan y que tengo los derechos de las imágenes y textos. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MiguelEspiau (talk • contribs) 15:07, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

No Problem

Hi Yann, Bugaku was my first extension because of a work for University. Don worry if I cant use image for others to learn more about Bugaku Ballet, there is no problem. I will not put again a picture, I thought just mention de Ballet company was enought. I don´t want troubles. Thank you for advice. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nazareth Garcia Jaksetic (talk • contribs) 23:34, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kristalina Georgieva headshot

Hi Yann

Kristalina Georgieva has requested that her photo is changed to the one in the red jacket. For this to happen do I need to send an email from her office to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org?

Thanks

Alex — Preceding unsigned comment added by Macsteree (talk • contribs) 10:37, 23 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Restauration « ‪File:Logo-camerdish.jpg‬ ».

Bonjour Yann. Le fichier « ‪File:Logo-camerdish.jpg‬ » est un logo utilisé uniquement dans le cadre d'une démarche historique. Dans un article, j'ai vu que wikimedia commons en français autorisait le téléchargement de logo dans cette optique. Peut-être, je n'ai pas utilisé la bonne procédure par ignorance. Merci de corriger la démarche pour que ce soit itilusable — Preceding unsigned comment added by Elns (talk • contribs) 08:44, 28 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Merci beaucoup, Yann. Donc maintenant la page peut être publiée. A qui dois-je m'adresser pour ça ? Merci encore, bonne journée. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gae Liberati (talk • contribs) 09:56, 28 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Photo de Nina de Padova.

Merci beaucoup, Yann. Donc maintenant la page peut être publiée. A qui dois-je m'adresser pour ça ?

Merci encore, bonne journée. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gae Liberati (talk • contribs) 16:52, 28 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Olimasy

thank you for letting me know about the licence issues. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Olimasy (talk • contribs) 11:50, 2 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Copyvio

Yann, I request you to delete the images that were uploaded by in Wikimedia Commons due to some copyright and legal issues as these images were not copyrighted as per the laws in my country, India. Please delete them asap.

These are the follwing images The stones on the shores.jpg The Waves.jpg The Dusk.jpg The Shores.jpg Sea-shells.jpg

Regards. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sarthakm71 (talk • contribs) 11:41, 12 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, my name is Vladimir. I am an assistant of Arman Davletyarov. At his request, I change the information on his personal page (https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%94%D0%B0%D0%B2%D0%BB%D0%B5%D1%82%D1%8F%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B2,_%D0%90%D1%80%D0%BC%D0%B0%D0%BD_%D0%98%D0%BB%D1%8E%D0%B1%D0%B0%D0%B5%D0%B2%D0%B8%D1%87) under the Assist937 account. Previously, at the request of my manager, I changed his personal information as it was not reliable and I also replaced the old photo with a new one. But, the system, or perhaps your bot has blocked this photo and referred to the fact that I am violating copyright (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:%D0%94%D0%B0%D0%B2%D0%BB%D0%B5%D1%82%D1%8F%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B2_%D0%90%D1%80%D0%BC%D0%B0%D0%BD.jpg) Please tell me how can I return this photo in order not to violate copyrights? What should be done? I myself work on the Muz-TV channel and received this photo from our press service. We work at events at the photographers who work under the contract and after all the events they pass all the photos with copyright to our press service. I even found the author of this photo (https://vk.com/palshkov) Nikita Palshkov. He is in touch with us and is ready, if necessary, to sign all the necessary documents and grant the right to publish this photo to you. Only I have one question, what should I do? What documents to sign? What to send and where to send. This is my first experience, and I do not know how to do it. I would be grateful for your help in my situation.

I’m looking forward to your reply.

Best regards, Vladimir — Preceding unsigned comment added by Assist937 (talk • contribs) 08:54, 13 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Assist937: Hi,
The copyright holder has to send a formal written permission. Please see COM:OTRS for the instructions. If the copyright holder is an organisation, the permission must come from someone entitled to release it (legal department, etc.). Or the image should be published with a free license on the organisation website. This would also be faster, as there is a big backlog in OTRS. Regards, Yann (talk) 10:33, 13 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
PS: Please sign your messages with ~~~~
Hi, this photo is published in the public domain on our official website of Muz-TV channel http://muz-tv.ru/pic/8/1/8132a8b864e13b083e719886f1db592b.jpg, photo is in this sectionhow http://muz-tv.ru/static/about/, can it be used in Wikipedia for his personal page? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Assist937 (talk • contribs) 13:17, 15 May 2019 (UTC) (UTC)[reply]
@Assist937: Hi,
Please sign your messages with ~~~~
This website fails to load for me right now, and I don't read Russian. May be you can ask undeletion on COM:UDR. Regards, Yann (talk) 13:19, 15 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
File:Star Sports 2.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

De728631 (talk) 16:03, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Uploads by Florent2B

Florent2B (talk · contributions · Statistics · Recent activity · block log · User rights log · uploads · Global account information)

Hi Yann, could you please clarify the series of "Jeanne Hauville" uploads by this user? The username doesn't quite match the name of the painter, so we might have a bunch of derivative photos here needing OTRS. De728631 (talk) 08:17, 14 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done All of his uploads need s fix. :( Yann (talk) 10:04, 14 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@De728631: No answer after 2 warnings, so I nominated all the files for deletion. Regards, Yann (talk) 08:19, 21 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Merci beaucoup! De728631 (talk) 19:07, 21 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Yann! Please restore File:Godslave_Promofoto_2018.jpg due to a permission in OTRS ticket: 2019052010002701. Thank you, Doc Taxon (talk) 11:00, 20 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Doc Taxon: Are you an OTRS member? Regards, Yann (talk) 11:48, 20 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
yes I am, otherwise I couldn't read the ticket ... Doc Taxon (talk) 19:50, 20 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, I now categorized my user account in Category:Commons OTRS volunteers -- Doc Taxon (talk) 19:53, 20 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done @Doc Taxon: You should use {{User OTRS}}. Regards, Yann (talk) 08:12, 21 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Self portrait deletions

Hello Yann, would it be possible for you to close the discussions (it's long overdue) and delete a couple of my self-portraits (this and this) that I no longer require? I hope I'm not jumping the gun in making these requests. In any case, do let me know what you think. Thanks --AVasanth (WMF) (talk) 07:34, 23 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done Yann (talk) 12:37, 23 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright Violation

Hi Yann, how are you doing ? Regarding your message, of copyright violation, I have the permission to use this material. Not sure how should I proceed to confirm that, but I have all rights to publish this material. Let me know, if there is anything I should do, to confirm that. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fcgaldino (talk • contribs) 09:10, 24 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Fcgaldino: Hi,
Please ask the copyright holder to send a permission. Never pretend that the works are your own, or that you are the copyright holder. We will probably ask for the original images from the camera. Please see COM:OTRS for the detailed instrutions. Regards, Yann (talk) 09:40, 24 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Need some help

Hey Yann,

Can you please move the file File:Periodic table cup cakes 2.jpg to File:Periodic table cup cakes.jpg ? I need to test some redirection problems with the FPCBot. I don't know if it's a valid reason for moving the file but I see a very old issue at https://github.com/Zitrax/FPCBot/issues/4 that needs to be fixed. -- Eatcha (Talk-Page) - ping me 17:15, 26 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done Yann (talk) 17:30, 26 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ajout d'oeuvres de Cézanne à partir du catalogue raisonné...

Yann,

En travaillant méthodiquement, musée par musée, je constate que pour certains d'entre eux nous n'avons que très peu de leur collection (Cézanne) dans Wikidata...

Que dirais-tu de créer en série (avec QuickStatements) les éléments pour les œuvres manquantes, avec lien vers le catalogue, + Cézanne + peinture (ou dessin) ?

Ou bien préfères-tu d'abord terminer d'ajouter les images à ceux qui sont déjà là ? --Hsarrazin (talk) 15:30, 30 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Hsarrazin: Oui, j'y pensais, mais comment faire pour éviter les doublons ? Ce qui est intéressant aussi dans le Catalogue, c'est l'historique des œuvres qui est très détaillé. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 15:46, 30 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
une fois que j'ai terminé d'ajouter les liens sur un musée, il est facile de voir les tableaux de ce musée qui ne sont pas encore dans wikidata... --Hsarrazin (talk) 16:26, 30 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
exemple : pour l'Albertina, on n'a que 2 tableaux https://w.wiki/4UJ
alors qu'il y en a 15 sur https://www.cezannecatalogue.com/collections/entry.php?id=1536 ;)
@Hsarrazin: OK, très bien. Vas-y si tu arrives à importer les données sans y passer des années, super. Yann (talk) 17:10, 30 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Demande

Je demande l'annulation de mon blocage sur Wikimedia Commons qui dure plus de 40 jours maintenant, j'étais nouveau et je ne saisissais pas vraiment comment importer des fichiers (ce qu'on peut faire et ce qu'on peut pas), et je n'ai pas vu les avertissements que je recevais. Cordialement. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Oussama 499 (talk • contribs) 04:19, 31 May 2019 (UTC) (UTC)[reply]

@Oussama 499: Vous n’êtes plus bloqué. Le bloc a expiré le 27 mai. Merci de signer vos messages. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 04:19, 31 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Does this logo look like the Paramount logo of File:Paramount01131923ad.png? Just want to check if at least one from Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by ParamountLogoMaker was actually public domain or not. Abzeronow (talk) 16:24, 1 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Abzeronow: It is the same idea, but not exactly the same logo. Most importantly, it is of very poor quality, so I don't see the need. Regards, Yann (talk) 16:26, 1 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Ah, OK. I'll just wait until 1926 stuff is public domain in the US and upload a better scan then. (Will also try to see if I can get better scans than extracting from Internet Archive) Thanks Abzeronow (talk) 16:30, 1 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Removed pictures of Bollywood Hungama

@Yann: Hi, please give your opinion at Commons:Deletion requests/Bollywood Hungama Copyright. Thanks and Regards! --CptViraj (Talk) 06:19, 6 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@CptViraj: There is no reason for deleting these files. The CC-BY-SA is irrevocable. Please withdraw your request. Thanks, Yann (talk) 07:21, 6 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Yann: Hmm Okay! --CptViraj (Talk) 07:23, 6 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

PoliticoIndian uploaded pics - Undeletion requests

Hi,

I am referring this discussion regarding GODL applicability - https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Undeletion_requests/Archive#Files_uploaded_by_PoliticoIndian

I was under the impression that I could utilize these files under the copyright policy as mentioned in the Loksabha site.

All copyrights are reserved with the Lok Sabha Secretariat. The material listed may be reproduced without formal permission for the purposes of non-commercial research, private study and for criticism, review and news reporting provided that the material is appropriately attributed. For any other re-use of the material you are required to seek permission by sending a mail to us.Under Section 2 (k) of the Copyright Act (No. 14 1975), the copyright for the reproduction of any material from the debates and ancillary publications vests with the Lok Sabha Secretariat. A member desirous of reproducing any material from the Lok Sabha Debates or even his own speeches is required to seek formal permission from the Speaker giving specific details of the matter to be reproduced. The copyright matters are examined by the Editorial Branch.

However I was not clear of which copyright clearance I should use, hence had used the GODL notification as was recommended to me by certain users. So could you please still tell me as to why I cannot use these pics as their use does fall under reproduction for non-commercial purposes.

Please assume that I was using them in good faith. --Politicoindian (talk) 07:03, 9 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Politicoindian: The license at the Lok Sabha website is not OK for Commons. For Commons, files must be available for any use, including commercial ones.
GODL would be OK, but it is not clear how these files would be covered by GODL. You could ask on Template talk:GODL-India. Actually we are trying to get a lawyer's opinion about this. Regards, Yann (talk) 07:13, 9 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Shobha Rao.jpg

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Shobha Rao.jpg says you deleted the file, but the file did not delete. Can you please revisit. Thanks. Nv8200p (talk) 00:09, 10 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Nv8200p: Another file was reuploaded with the same name. Regards, Yann (talk) 04:23, 10 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Verif OTRS

Bonjour Yann, Pourrais tu me confirmer que l'autorisation OTRS existe bien pour cette photo File:Peter Smith.jpg étant donné que la personne ayant rajouté le bandeau n'est pas membre OTRS. Merci d'avance ! Olivier LPB (talk) 12:02, 11 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Olivier LPB: The ticket is partly in German, so I will let someone reading it to confirm. I removed the permission. Regards, Yann (talk) 12:51, 11 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Structured Data - testing qualifiers for depicts

As you might have seen, testing is underway for adding qualifiers to depicts statements. If you have not left feedback already, the Structured Data on Commons development team is very interested in hearing about your experience using qualifiers on the file page and in the UploadWizard. To get started you can visit Test-Commons and chose a random file to test out, or upload your own file to try out the UploadWizard. Questions, comments, and concerns can be left on the Structured data talk page and the team will address them as best as they can. Thank you for your time. -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 19:08, 11 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Request for Deletions

Hi, Can you delete Template:Potd/2019-08-29, Template:Potd/2019-08-29 (en), Template:Potd/2019-08-29 (es), and Template:Potd/2019-08-29 (fr)? I decided that featuring it on the date that it occurred would be a better choice.

Thank you so much,

--Boothsift 02:21, 13 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done Yann (talk) 06:43, 13 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Yann. If you are confident with the speedy deletion of this file, should all derivatives also be speedy deleted? Special:Search/insource:"File:The Book of Börk.png".

Also same question for File:Rolf Schilling und Ernst Jünger (edit).jpg is from File:Rolf Schilling und Ernst Jünger.jpg.--BevinKacon (talk) 11:43, 15 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
Thanks for your message. I deleted the second one.
For the first one, it could be argued that the individual files are too simple to get a copyright. However the composition doesn't. Please open a DR if you think it necessary. Regards, Yann (talk) 13:11, 15 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Just delete anything problematic you see

As easy like that. (I mean, from my uploads.) --SNAAAAKE!! (talk) 14:47, 15 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Or else give a "proper attribution", or whatever, just do as you wish. --SNAAAAKE!! (talk) 15:02, 15 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I mean, you might also point to a few originals (on flickr) and explain to what exactly was wrong witch each of them. I'm avoiding now turned on screen displays and images of huge posters and nothing else, that much I did understand, but maybe it's something else besides that. --SNAAAAKE!! (talk) 15:32, 15 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@SNAAAAKE!!: OK, fine. For the future, please read COM:DW. Thanks, Yann (talk) 16:17, 15 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Incomplete_deletion_requests_-_missing_reason are my own tags on deletion - I didn't even mean to upload them. --SNAAAAKE!! (talk) 16:28, 15 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

After https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Stand_de_Paysafecard_(15532843397).jpg&oldid=prev&diff=354765856 I'd really appreciate if you explained to me what kind of computer screen imagery is okay, on my talk page. --SNAAAAKE!! (talk) 16:48, 15 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@SNAAAAKE!!: Yes, this one is probably OK, because it is mostly an empty screen. I deleted most of the files you nominated. Please read also COM:DR to learn how to do a deletion request properly. Regards, Yann (talk) 16:51, 15 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It would be cool if you automatically changed "201" into "2016" (an already existing category) here: https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Category:PAX_South_201 --SNAAAAKE!! (talk) 17:38, 15 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done Yann (talk) 17:41, 15 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

[1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10] to be deleted and I just aborted this upload altogether. --SNAAAAKE!! (talk) 06:56, 16 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I'd only contest the PAX logos at PAX's own events because they're quite really obvious. But you may delete if you really want. And speaking of PAX, I'm not sure of the value of this empty category: [11] I haven't seen any photos from this one, too. --SNAAAAKE!! (talk) 07:32, 16 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@SNAAAAKE!!: You should select carefully the images you upload. Otherwise, it just gives more works to reviewers and admins. Thanks, Yann (talk) 07:36, 16 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I'm trying. I really thought PAX logos at PAX events should be okay. --SNAAAAKE!! (talk) 07:39, 16 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Could you get everyone at https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Category:Promotional_models_at_video_game_trade_shows moved to "Female" sub-category? --SNAAAAKE!! (talk) 12:31, 16 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Also I'd like you to check out https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:The_Art_of_Video_Games - it's an actual museum here and so I don't know what goes. --SNAAAAKE!! (talk) 13:27, 16 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I'd also request all the "GDC 2010" images from https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Game_Developers_Conference_2012 to be moved to the the 2010 edition, if it's possible to be done in an easy way. --SNAAAAKE!! (talk) - I'm going with to you because I think you have topols for that stuff to be made with few an an instant, if not I'll do it manually myself. 13:46, 16 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Image not displayed with Artwork template

Hi! Do you know why image (P18) no longer renders its value as an image in the top-right corner for files using the Artwork template with Wikidata? Among the files now affected are those you listed here. AlbanGeller (talk) 04:51, 16 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@AlbanGeller: Sorry, I have no idea, but may be @Jarekt: may know. Regards, Yann (talk) 05:57, 16 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I noticed it too that for some rare files, the image does not shows up. I was debugging it yesterday, but did not figure it out yet. --Jarekt (talk) 12:06, 16 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@AlbanGeller and Yann: , I never figured out what was wrong with the new version of the Module, so I did partial revert of this section to the previous working version. --Jarekt (talk) 02:30, 17 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your previous UDR

Hello, just want to let you know that in Commons:Village pump/Copyright#Number 10 Flickr, some users believed that the File:Red in No. 10 Downing Street.jpg can't apply the OGL. OGL can only apply for those images appears in the UK Government website. --B dash (talk) 09:12, 16 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Images de valeur

Bonjour, merci de promouvoir plusieurs de mes images en Images de valeur, je ne me suis pas intéressé jusqu'à maintenant à ce sujet, étant plutôt sur les Images de qualité. Je dois avoir 4 ou 5 VI à l'heure actuelle et n'ai pas créé de catégorie spéciale pour l'instant mais je suis surpris de voir que pour 3 images (File:Armand duc de Guiche 1900.jpg, File:Cavalier Gaulois Pont D'Iena RG am.jpg et File:Cavalier grec by François-Théodore Devaulx, Paris 23 May 2012.jpg elles ont été catégorisée en Category:Valued images by Yann Forget ce qui porte à confusion. Je vous demande aussi de bien vouloir me prévenir quand une de mes image est promue par vous car je ne peux le découvrir que par hasard. Merci à l'avance et bien. cordialement. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Siren-Com (talk • contribs) Yann (talk) 14:46, 16 June 2019 (UTC) (UTC)[reply]

@Siren-Com: Bonjour,
OK, désolé de ne pas vous avoir prévenu. Category:Valued images by Yann Forget est pour les images que j'ai nominées. La plupart viennent de photographes extérieurs à Commons. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 14:46, 16 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Merci de cette réponse rapide. J'en profite pour vous demander un renseignement : quelle différence y-a-il entre Image remarquable (Featured pictures) et Image de Valeur (Valued image) ? Category:Valued images of Paris et Category:Featured pictures of Paris on s'y perd ! Une image peut-elle être dans les 2 catégories ? - Cdlt - Siren-Com (talk) 14:58, 16 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Siren-Com: Les critères sont différents, et beaucoup plus faciles pour les "Images de valeur". Une image remarquable peut être aussi une image de valeur, mais ce n'est pas automatique, et inversement. En bref, une image de valeur est la meilleure image disponible sur Commons pour un sujet donné. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 15:10, 16 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry

I am very late and very sorry. I did not thank you for this answer Commons:Village_pump/Copyright/Archive/2019/04#GFDL_and_authors. I appreciate it very much. Thanks a lot. Regards--Pierpao.lo (listening) 10:15, 18 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted content 19/06

Hello Yan,

You deleted my pictures. I think i uploaded them in the wrong category. They were stills from television series, more detailed, the logo's (opening titels) of the series. There are many opening titles and logo's stills on Wikipedia and Wiki commons on pages about television series, and it being used under the term fair use. That's what i also wanted to do. So i think i uploaded them wrong and what should i do to bring them back under the right terms?

Best regards — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dassenman (talk • contribs) 15:55, 19 June 2019 (UTC) (UTC)[reply]

@Dassenman: Hi,
Fair use is not accepted on Commons. You have to upload your files on the Wikipedia project you want to use them. Regards, Yann (talk) 15:55, 19 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
PS: Please sign your messages.

Hello, can you tell me how to that? Wikipedia says i have to use Commons Upload Wizard. So now i am a bit confused. Regards, Dassenman

@Dassenman: I suppose you mean the English Wikipedia, so please read en:Wikipedia:Non-free content criteria. The upload page is here: en:Wikipedia:File Upload Wizard. Regards, Yann (talk) 17:07, 19 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

No, it's the Dutch Wikipedia. And they say i have to upload the pages in Commons with the same explantion i had done yesterday. https://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Upload Regards, Dassenman

@Dassenman: Fair use policy depends on each local project. I have no idea about the Dutch Wikipedia. I don't speak Dutch. You have to ask there. Regards, Yann (talk) 05:00, 20 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! If I remember correctly, this file is a part of this photo. Please bring back the file and correct its description. Greetings, Wiktoryn (talk) 12:38, 20 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Wiktoryn: Yes, but there is no reason to use PNG format. Crops are best done with the CropTool. That way all information from the source is preserved. See in your preferences, gadget section, and then the link in the left column. Regards, Yann (talk) 12:47, 20 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of and File:AjahnSundara.jpg

Hello. I received a copyright violation notice for both these images from User:Patrick_Rogel on the grounds that these photos exist already at

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jaoZyUf2QEk

https://thefulcrum.ca/features/leslie-weir-from-the-university-of-ottawas-librarian-to-canadas/

In fact, both these photographs were given to me by the subject of the photographs and are out of copyright.

This is the first time I have encountered this situation and I will be appealing the deletion by whatever the process is, once I've figured it out.

In the meantime I was curious about Patrick Rogel and discovered that he was banned from the Wikipedia for similaly overzealous page removals

https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Discussion_utilisateur:Patrick_Rogel

I thought you might want to know if you didn't already. {{unsigned|Vellino|Yann (talk) 14:49, 20 June 2019 (UTC)}[reply]

@Vellino: Hi,
Patrick Rogel is an experienced user. He was right to tag your files since they were published elsewhere without a free license.
Anyway, your are not allowed to upload files, when you are not the author, without a formal written permission from the author.
In that case, the copyright holder has to confirm the free license by email. Please see COM:OTRS for the instructions. Regards, Yann (talk) 14:49, 20 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
PS: Please sign your messages with ~~~~.
@Yann: Thanks for your feedback. I will follow the instructions and get back to you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vellino (talk • contribs) 19:07, 20 June 2019 (UTC) (UTC)[reply]

File:Чеченский котёл.jpg

Hey. Author gave permission in the comments File:Чеченский котёл.jpg. You can check?--Takhirgeran Umar (talk) 18:02, 20 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

possible vandalism

Hamidrezamousavi (talk · contributions · Statistics · Recent activity · block log · User rights log · uploads · Global account information)

Hi, I found User:Hamidrezamousavi have re-uploaded an confirmed violation image, please kindly comfirm if this account is doing vandal.--Hamish (talk) 05:39, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

OK, deleted, last warning sent. Thanks for your help. Regards, Yann (talk) 07:09, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
He comes again, please kindly check. And please tell me where I should go to report vandal except IRC.--Hamish (talk) 16:34, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done OK, blocked. By the way, we don't call that "vandalism", but "copyright violations". Regards, Yann (talk) 16:48, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for that notice, but where I should go to report the user who do the thing as Hamidrezamousavi? I think IRC is not a regular way.--Hamish (talk) 16:57, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
In that case, the correct forum is COM:ANU. Regards, Yann (talk) 17:54, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pride GO Bus photo that was deleted

I took the photo myself, it was copied from my Instagram feed. It may have appeared on facebook also, uploaded both to Insta and FB at the same time. Is it not ok? Oaktree b (talk) 13:44, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Oaktree b: EXIF data shows that it was uploaded to Instagram and/or Facebook first, and then to Commons. Please upload again the original file from your camera. Regards, Yann (talk) 13:48, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Vinicius Damir

Could you help me to keep this page Wikified?

https://pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vin%C3%ADcius_Damir — Preceding unsigned comment added by Victor Silva 16 (talk • contribs) 05:12, 22 June 2019 (UTC) (UTC)[reply]

@Victor Silva 16: Sorry, but no. You have to ask on the Portuguese Wikipedia. Regards, Yann (talk) 05:12, 22 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for deleting the deletion request. The text of the deletion requests referred to content that was no longer present in the current state of the article, Special:Diff/355594338, Special:Diff/355605241, Special:Diff/355665746, Special:Diff/355665868. So probably vandalism is not the best summary ;-), but I agree that the talk page should be kept. Thanks! –Simon04 (talk) 07:42, 22 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Some Henri Gautreau files I want you to check..

Are these File:1877 Henri Gautreau 18 ans.jpg & File:1898 carte de visite H. Gautreau.jpg, the same files as File:1877 HG Gautreau 18 ans.jpg & File:1898 carte de visite HG 2Mo.jpg? Abzeronow (talk) 22:02, 18 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Abzeronow: Yes, they are the same files. Regards, Yann (talk) 05:45, 19 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, Yann. Is this file a drawing of a patent or a model of one of Gautreau's inventions? File:Planche du brevet Henri Gautreau 1893 modèle Le Démontable.jpg Abzeronow (talk) 15:59, 19 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Abzeronow: It is a drawing. When did the author died? Regards, Yann (talk) 16:02, 19 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Henri Gautreau died in 1947. Abzeronow (talk) 16:04, 19 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Good, restored. Yann (talk) 16:11, 19 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Abzeronow: What about the other files in this DR? Do we have them already? They seem to be all in the public domain. Regards, Yann (talk) 06:46, 20 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Some of the files already are on Commons like File:Facture HG 1932.jpg, File:1897 - HG Gautreau au 30 rue des Amandiers.jpg, File:HG 1902 portrait retouché.jpg, File:Carton publicitaire 1899 HG.jpg , File:1901 Henri Gautreau en Mise point d'un nouveau modèle.jpg , File:Le Volcan, extrait du catalogue HG 1903.jpg and File:Les deux paniers catalogue HG 1948.jpg. The rest that I haven't named above are ones that Commons doesn't have. Abzeronow (talk) 15:38, 20 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
OK, I restored the other files. Regards, Yann (talk) 06:27, 23 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Yuri Gagarin

The photo of Gagarin has been restored. How do we delist and replace it as a valued image. File:Yuri Gagarin (1961) - Restoration.jpg. Thank you for nominating! Coffeeandcrumbs (talk) 03:10, 24 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Coffeeandcrumbs: Commons:Valued image candidates/Most valued review is the procedure. Regards, Yann (talk) 08:01, 24 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File to restore

Here it is the file, I try uploading in XCF but ocurred an error on the server so I can't do it in that file format. Regards!! Ezarateesteban 23:51, 24 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Incorrect deletion

Hello!

We have 8 pictures that have been proposed for deletion and 2 pictures that have already been deleted even though the copyright holders have emailed their permission to Wikimedia in April 2019. Case no. ticket:2019032910004053. See list of the pictures below.

Can you help us correcting this and removing the deletion data? Should I contact someone else?

Kind regards Gunnar Lindgren

8 images proposed for deletion: • Christallen (a photo of the group) • Christallen 1965 • Christallen 1966 • Christallen 1967 • Christallen 1968 • Christallen 1969 • Christallen 1970 • Christallen 1971

2 images deleted • Christallen records • Christallen-lang

--Bertil hammarkrans (talk) 10:31, 23 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Bertil hammarkrans: Are you also Riggwelter? The permission is in Swedish, so I can't do much. Maybe you can ask on Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard. Regards, Yann (talk) 11:29, 23 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I'm looking in to this, due to message on svwp's Village pump. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 21:59, 23 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Yann: No, I am not Hammarkrans. Riggwelter (talk) 19:50, 26 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"Popeye" image

Hello, I saw that you removed an image that I recently uploaded to commons. As I am not savvy to all the little justifications, could you please explain why an image such as this: [12] a clear copyrighted photo is allowed, but mine was not? and could you then please explain how I might be able to upload the image? there is no other image of the subject. It clearly has no copyright or ownership. It is low resolution. Used only one time. Etc. I think the formality of requirements on Commons is the reason for its removal? Thanks. Much appreciation. Maineartists (talk) 12:19, 25 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Maineartists: Hi,
As you can read here, this image is uploaded locally on the English Wikipedia under a fair use rationale, while fair use is not allowed on Commons. Please read en:Wikipedia:Non-free content, and reupload your files on the English Wikipedia. Thanks, Yann (talk) 07:05, 26 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks so much! I really appreciate it! I'm still learning all the ins-and-outs! best, Maineartists (talk) 11:26, 26 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

VI of Manuel Ramírez Sánchez

Hi Yann,

Thank you for your comment in this nomination to valued image. However I think I shouldn't have made what I did... I see your oppose vote and something in my mind, maybe a neck pain that I have, said me that I should renominate it. But then I realized that I shouldn't renominate because the nomination wasn't closed.

Now the nomination is available with the correct scope, but I am going to fix it because now I remember that the previous scope should be striked and then use the new, if I am not wrong; however, now there is a previous reviews section with my comment and your comment. I don't know if it should be fixed or not, but I wanted to notice you, as reviewer, this incident to avoid a misunderstanding of the situation.

Excuse me the inconvenience.

Regards, Ivanhercaz (talk) 14:50, 27 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I tried to fix everything. I think I didn't forget nothing. Again, excuse me the inconvenience.
Regards, Ivanhercaz (talk) 15:09, 27 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Bystander selfies

Commons:Village pump/Proposals/Archive/2017/01#Bystander selfie

Seems like m:Wikilegal/Authorship and Copyright Ownership#The Example of the Third Party Photographer wasn't even linked there. Maybe it's worth considering to propose it again? - Alexis Jazz ping plz 04:01, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ah yes, sure! I am in a middle of a Wikimedia workshop, so not this weekend. Regards, Yann (talk) 04:10, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Yann. This file has been tagged {{Licensereview}} by you. However, the site is lost now and its permission can not be confirmed. I want to make the tag correct, but can I use the reviewer's notation as your name? Kind regards.--Y.haruo (talk) 15:18, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Y.haruo: Yes, that is the problem. I have advised Fae to add a license review at the time of upload, but he didn't do it. Now I can't help. Regards, Yann (talk) 15:28, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I understand.--Y.haruo (talk) 15:36, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Commons Undeletion Request

hi Mr. yann, thank you very much for your intervention regarding my request for recovery, I'm checking files by file, the uploads of this abuser and I undertake you to submit only those of which still have useful information regarding copyright, because I saw in the archives that his requests for restoration were being canceled constantly, but now I want to see clearly, they are not convinced that in that tide of files there are of files in good faith, and I bet they will not be few. I feel it will be very interesting--NNEPEL12 (talk) 11:44, 30 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar
You are very helpful. Thank you. Roshanshaik5555 (talk) 19:44, 30 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Photo walk in Stockholm

It's only a few weeks until Wikimania 2019 in Sweden. I'd like to invite you to the Commons Photographer's photo walk. If you're planning on going to Stockholm in August, please consider joining this event. This is an opportunity to connect with other photographers, have fun together, and explore the beauty of an iconic Scandinavian city… All the best, --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 03:37, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated

Regarding [13]

The file is my own work as indicated so I'm not sure what needs to be added. I downloaded the data from ESA https://scihub.copernicus.eu/dhus/#/home and processed it using QGIS. Pieceofmetalwork (talk) 18:27, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Pieceofmetalwork: This is a copy from some other work, so not entorely your work. That's why you need to provide the source. I did it for you this time. Thanks, Yann (talk) 06:40, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted images

Hello Yann,

You deleted the photos that I have uploaded. I filled all the information, including the name of the photographer.

Can you please help me with telling what was missing/wrong, so that I can upload them again correctly?

Thank you! Vanessa — Preceding unsigned comment added by Manolova 366 (talk • contribs) 18:44, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Manolova 366: Hi,
You need to show that Vladimir Kokuzanov gave his permission to publish his pictures under a free license. He can do that by email. Please see COM:OTRS for the instructions. Regards, Yann (talk) 09:16, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

questions about copyright violation

Hello, Yann. I'm so sorry im uploading too much photos that are copyright violation. i am a beginner of wikipedia and wikimedia so im not that expert in this thing. but i really wanted to upload the image to tell about the movie. can i know how to upload photos from facebook without having copyright violations — Preceding unsigned comment added by Daycodin (talk • contribs) 05:27, 5 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Daycodin: Hi,
Basically, you can't. You need a formal written permission from the author to upload an image if you are not the photographer. Just in case, see COM:OTRS for the instructions. Regards, Yann (talk) 05:33, 5 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]