User talk:Yann/archives 35

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search


ABDO2008.DZ

Hello thank you for your alert. It's true that there are some copyright infringements I have requested to delete but no one has done so. But most of the deleted pictures belong to me, meaning I own them. You participated in the 2015 Earth Wiki Contest. So check yourself before you block my account. If it is about the quality of the pictures, the opinion is yours. Thank--ABDO2008.DZ (talk) 12:49, 28 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
For undeletion, please see COM:UDR. Generally please upload the original pictures, not small versions. Regards, Yann (talk) 21:01, 29 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Adryanvinicius123

Eu atualizei, mas um moderador desfez tudo me acusando de violar regras, e agora a página voltou a ter a falta de informações que tinha antes. Adryanvinicius123 (talk) 23:36, 28 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I have posted some pictures and informations in my city page on wikipedia, and you deleted all.

The page needs to be recycled, i did, i updated the page, i added new photos about my city, i added informations about the prefecture of my city, and you just deleted all my work, I need clarification. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Adryanvinicius123 (talk • contribs) 23:55, 28 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Adryanvinicius123: Hi,
I deleted your pictures as they don't seem to be taken by you. If you have the permission from the photographer, please see COM:OTRS for the procedure. Regards, Yann (talk) 20:19, 29 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kjiva marathi rapper.jpg

Hi, I nominated this for deletion a while ago as being out of scope, but you denied this as the file was still in use on Wikidata. However, it hasn't been for several weeks now. Should I nominate it again? --Randykitty (talk) 07:56, 29 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Randykitty,
Yes please do. Yann (talk) 20:17, 29 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Warner Music Norway

Hi, all the photos I've uploaded to commons are by instructions from Warner Music Norway, seeing as I'm a trainee here. I might've put down the wrong license, but were told by the photographer and my co-workers that I were to treat the photos as if they were mine. Could you not have them deleted? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Beckyallis (talk • contribs) 09:24, 29 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Beckyallis: Hi,
A legal representative from Warner Music Norway will have to send a formal written permission for a free license. Please see COM:OTRS for the procedure. Regards, Yann (talk) 20:49, 29 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to serve as a judge

I would like to have you as of one the judges of Commons:Wiki Loves Uniformed services (India). Wiki Loves Uniformed services (India) (WLUS) is a public photo competition on Wikimedia Commons for use on Wikipedia and other project websites of the Wikimedia Foundation. With the inspiration drawn from Wiki Loves Monuments (WLM) and Wiki Loves Food (WLF), this is first iteration of its kind in 2017. For this year, the predominant aim of the the project is the improve the quality of images of different uniformed services of the Indian sub-continental region. We're having two streams of judges, subjective and qualitative. The subjective judges will look into the subject of the image, whom we're considering from services background and two qualitative judges, who would look into the various image parameters such as saturation, focus, lighting etc. The first filtration will be done by the coordinators, then goes a subjective analysis, followed by a qualitative one, which will be done by you (if you wish to serve) and Diego Delso (User:Poco a poco), then followed by fine filtration of images which tells us the best story. So would you like to help us. As the motto of WMF, this would be a volunteer work, but however, you will receive a "Certificate of Acknowledgement" and special gifts if possible. Please reply as soon as possible. --Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk · mail) 15:02, 29 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Copyright violations

Can you explain me how to upload correctly? Because most of pictures I have upload are my own work. Thanks. Igho (talk)

Hi Igho,
You need a formal written permission for a free license before uploading anything you didn't create yourself. Please see COM:OTRS for the procedure. Regards, Yann (talk) 20:51, 29 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I'll try to be careful the next time with future pictures

You contacted me in my talk page, you noticed me I violated copyright many times, those mistakes were made by uploading pictures of "mobile devices". My intention is not violating copyright, but I always fail when I upload some pictures. ViperSnake151 contacted me about a picture of the Galaxy S8 taken from official website, the work wasn't mine but I didn't think the use of those images is a violation, he explained me why it was considered a violation (you can check my talk page). My first uploads were license-less, so, they were deleted. It's the first time I have a notice in my talk page. Again, my intention is not violate the Commons guidelines, but my uploads of "mobile devices" ends being deleted for different reasons, "it's license-less, or it's copyrighted". In order to avoid mistakes like that, I'll try to check if the picture is valid (in case of taking a picture from Internet), and ask for help if necessary. TheWikiContributor (talk) 00:27, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Curious Alice (1971).webm

Hello Yann, j'ai un remords : ce film me semblait être PS-UsGov, mais le catalogue NARA précise "Some or all of this material may be restricted by copyright or other intellectual property rights restrictions". Pourrais-tu y jeter un coup d’œil et l'effacer ou ajouter le truc qui irait bien (il me semble qu'il y a un modèle pour préciser que certains éléments peuvent être sous copyright), selon ton jugement auquel je me remets ? D'avance merci. Cordialement, — Racconish ☎ 19:19, 28 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Up Clin — Racconish ☎ 19:23, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Bonjour, Je suppose que les matériaux potentiellement sous copyright sont les dessins et la bande son. Mais sans plus d'informations, il m'est impossible de savoir ce qui a été emprunté et ce qui a été réalisé sous contrat pour le film. Désolé. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 19:50, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Garder ou supprimer ? Qu'en penses-tu ? Cordialement, — Racconish ☎ 20:19, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Je suis un irréductible inclusioniste, donc... ;oP Yann (talk) 20:22, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Et moi ça me fendrait le cœur, mais bon. Merci pour ton avis ici Clin. Cordialement, — Racconish ☎ 20:26, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Rite-Aid and Walgreens merger photo collage

Hello, Yann You deleted this: File:Photo_Collage_for_Walgreens_and_Rite_Aid_Merger.jpg But email request was sent by owner to confirm all rights to OTRS. Should I provide ticketID?? That photo collage was added to article to appropriate place(now removed): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rite_Aid — Preceding unsigned comment added by NickDP (talk • contribs) 19:19, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@NickDP: Hi,
Yes, please what is the ticket ID? Regards, Yann (talk) 19:23, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Yann: Hello,
On 20th of March there was an email to Permissions - Wikimedia Commons from website-owner, Ticket:2017032010026424
Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by NickDP (talk • contribs) 22:04, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done Yann (talk) 08:37, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleting images because of copyright errors

Hi Yann I posted my request some time ago but missed that you wanted to receive only messages in English an French, sorry about that. I repeat my question therefore in English: On 18 December 2016 you informed me that I uploaded images violating licenses. Thank you for informing me because that was of course not my intention. As I am not yet very experienced with Wikipedia I may have missed something. And as I uploaded a whole bunch together I did not see in time the first message by Ras67. It was not my intention to ignore your hints. As I can't check the licenses I indicated at the time, I don't know exactly what the error was. Maybe there was a problem with the images from the Hungarian Mint as they gave me permission to include these photos in Wikipedia but did not express clearly permission to release them as completely free content. I will check that with them. As for the images from Coin Invest Trust I made sure that they definitely agree to publish all their photos under by-nc-sa3.0 and 4.0 licenses. I think that should be fine, no? And I think that I don't need a written permision to include, do I (although I have it)? I would appreciate it very much if you came back to me briefly as I don't want to violate any Wikimedia procedure. Thank you very much! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dupond2011 (talk • contribs)

@Dupond2011: Hi,
The files you uploaded are derivative works. Therefore you need a permission from the artist or designer of these works to upload them here. Please see COM:OTRS for the procedure. Regards, Yann (talk) 13:10, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kutas

Hello. About this - Commons:Requests for checkuser/Case/Serafimdmitriev --НоуФрост (talk) 20:12, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi НоуФрост,
OK. Thanks for notifying me. However there is no justification for speedy deletion. Better to wait for the result of the CU. Regards, Yann (talk) 20:15, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Then it is necessary and to restore this - File:Alexandra Kutas runway show VIY 2017.jpg? --НоуФрост (talk) 20:21, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
OK done. I would suggest to write to Ulyana Pashkova if she doesn't confirm her account after a few days. Regards, Yann (talk) 20:23, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

VI

Désolé mon programme de vote était déréglé, j'ai corrigé mais j'ai oublié ce vote. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:52, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Нупе аджамі

Hello. Can you, please, delete File:Нупе_аджамі.png and restore File:Нупе_аджамі.pdf (I wanted to replace png-version with pdf-version, because png-image has much bigger size, than pdf-document). --صلاح الأوكراني (talk) 09:54, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, The PNG is of much better quality, and a better format for this. That's why I kept the PNG and deleted the PDF. Regards, Yann (talk) 09:56, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I have created PNG version from the PDF document. If we open PDF-document at a high zoom level (for example, 550%), quality of PDF will be the same, as of PNG image. But the size of PDF is only 63 kB; while the size of PNG is 4,37 MB. --صلاح الأوكراني (talk) 10:19, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
OK, then the PNG should be reduced back to its original size, but it remains that PNG is a better format than PDF for this. Regards, Yann (talk) 10:38, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

delete

Im thinking in a excuse for delete some files here, but, I dont care, people here are so powerful... Please delete https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Texhnolyze-small-logo.gif

Its clear this logo is only shapes and basic fonts, this file have been for years in other wikis and its dont been deleted. Then now delete this files as well: https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Texhnolyze.jpg https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Datei:Texhnolyze_logo.gif

Regards, Cybermaid (talk) 05:51, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Cybermaid,
I don't think so, but you are free to ask for undeletion on COM:UDR. Regards, Yann (talk) 03:37, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mughal Historical Map.png

Hi @Yann, The above map was retained in 2015 because it is in use in wiki pages. However the map is highly inaccurate. It has no external data or other source to back it up. The map creator and uploader of Mughal Historical Map.png left me message yesterday admitting so. Should this be renominated for deletion? Is there a wikimedia policy about not deleting images of no educational value or other issues if they are in use? Removing a problem image from multiple wiki pages is best done with a bot (or is there a commons tool). Thank you, Ms Sarah Welch (talk) 16:11, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ms Sarah Welch,
It can't be deleted right now, since it is widely used. It first needs to be replaced, then nominated for deletion. Regards, Yann (talk) 16:20, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Replaced with? empty map or something? Thanks for the guidance, Ms Sarah Welch (talk) 16:42, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Ms Sarah Welch: A map you or someone else create. You can ask for help on the Map workshop on Commons, or on the Map workshop on the English Wikipedia. Regards, Yann (talk) 17:00, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I updated it a bit and uploaded a new one to replace it. It is a bit more accurate, yet remains flawed in all three periods. It still deserves to be deleted. Which reason should I cite with deletion nomination? Thanks for the continued guidance, Ms Sarah Welch (talk) 17:29, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
There is no way a deletion request to succeed until it is replaced. Regards, Yann (talk) 17:57, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I replaced it. I had to clear the cache to see the replacement. Ms Sarah Welch (talk) 15:30, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:AVİM LOGO.png

I'm sorry, but I don't agree that PD-text is applicable here. Yes, the right hand side is text only, but the left hand side is a proprietary logo. Could you perhaps have another look? Thanks! --Randykitty (talk) 12:34, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I think it is fine, but if you don't agree, please create a request for deletion. Regards, Yann (talk) 12:36, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pictures / Changall

Hello, Yann!

Hi Changall,

1. File:Picture of Ināra Petrusēviča.jpg. - I am an author of picture

This is a derivative work. You need the permission from artist.

2. File:Ināra Petrusēviča.jpg - I am a legal owner of picture. A picture was done for one exhibition, all copyrights belong to me

Idem above.
It from after that on a background a photo there are pictures? --Changall (talk) 05:51, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, but there are quite prominent here. It would be OK with a crop around the artist. Regards, Yann (talk) 09:19, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

3. File:Cecīlija Dinere.50g..jpg - I do not remember, prompt me what stood license? --Changall (talk) 13:32, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Old picture from 1950, author mentioned is Lilija Dinere. Permission from her (or her heirs) is needed. Regards, Yann (talk) 18:09, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
On my request she put on the web-site CC-BY-SA. But such mark is not present(. Lilija Dinere is in my Skype, I will ask her to deport permission.--Changall (talk) 05:51, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Please see the procedure at COM:OTRS. Regards, Yann (talk) 09:19, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bengal famine of 1943.jpg ... Not!

Lingzhi: Oh thanks! I deleted these 2 as duplicate. And what about this one from the same source? Regards, Yann (talk) 14:22, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Bystander Selfie

Hello Yann, You seem to be positively involved in the “bystander selfie” discussion. The reason I ask is that in 2012 I created a page for Chas Gerretsen and uploaded an image taken in Santiago, Chile in 1974 by a bystander with Chas’s camera and his film; “Chas Gerretsen and Caribinero”. The image is kept in Chas’s archives in the Nederlands Fotomuseum in Rotterdam. The image was deleted today. Reason: the subject could not possibly have photographed himself. Chas tried to get in touch with some acquaintances from 43 years ago who possibly might have pushed the button on his camera that day, to no avail. I asked Chas if he had any other photos of himself during his working life (1967-1989) in the jungles of Burma, Cambodia, Vietnam and Chile or during his time in Hollywood. His reply was that he only had photos of himself taken by bystanders presently unknown to him. What is the Wiki Commons policy at the present? --Pfmoni (talk) 18:32, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Pfmoni,
There is no clear policy, that's why I propose to create one. Submit the image for undeletion on COM:UDR, with the details. It may be undeleted. Regards, Yann (talk) 18:51, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Permission

Dear Yann,

I received your message about permission for these images:

What can I do now to upload these images to my article? Artur Szolc and Aneta Szolc are my family members, Annalist was the my Brother Artur Szolc band (I'm writing about him this wikipedia article) and Piotr Ratajski is also our family member. I understand everything about permission but now I didn't see these images now because they are delate. Be so kind and help me. I'm new here. It is very complicated for me and too much information.

Best, Ewa — Preceding unsigned comment added by Eszolc (talk • contribs)

@Eszolc: Hi,
Please ask each of the authors to send a permission for the respective files via COM:OTRS. The files can be restored once the permission is accepted. Regards, Yann (talk) 22:14, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

So when I'll get the agreements then I'll see these images one more time in my article?

Valued Images of women

Hello Yann. Here's 7 more VIs, with more to come: User talk:Daphne Lantier#Valued Image Promotion. Daphne Lantier 09:33, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
Please feel free to add them in Commons:Illustrating Women and Girls, Filling the Gaps, and remove the oldest ones. Regards, Yann (talk) 09:43, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Zanders.png

Hi Yann,

sorry to annoy you. But I am no Wikipedia Pro, so I simply don't know what to do now to get the new/current Zanders logo into the article. Maybe you can help me? You can download the logo here: http://zanders.de/lib/logos/zanders_logo.jpg http://zanders.de/lib/logos/zanders_logo.png

If you could help, it would be great.

Thanks in advance

Tobias — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hesselacht (talk • contribs)

@Hesselacht: Hi,
I suppose you want to edit the German Wikipedia? I can't help much as I don't speak German, and each language has its own rules. You may be able to get some help on Commons:Forum. Regards, Yann (talk) 13:10, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

OTRS licensing removal

Hello, these following files had sended OTRS because of a missing information about origins of originals, it was nominated for deletion for bad submitted sources and for missing permission information, so I've send vectorization OTRS, but then I took up through research that they are actually also in PD-old-70 and PD-old-EU license. Can you please remove these OTRS notifications, because they were already resolved by administrators in undeletion process.

Thanks, --ThecentreCZ (talk) 20:08, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done Yann (talk) 20:15, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User problem

Hi An account insulted me as a troll an said that it is the truth. He should be sanctionned. Regards. --Panam2014 (talk) 13:49, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done Yann (talk) 14:10, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Yann, Panam asked me. Otherwise I would never call anybody a troll.--Tostman (talk) 14:11, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
He continue to provok me. --Panam2014 (talk) 14:14, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pictures

Hello, Yann,

Thanks for making the controls. I did not intend to violate privacy policies. I'm training on the Wikipedia platform and I'm learning. I'll try to be much more careful with the photos. Thanks for correcting me, and sorry. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SelimDavidMusali (talk • contribs) 19:29, 02 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Restore photos

All my photos were created by me, and I approve of them being here, please restore them.

And stop this shit. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Elimnator (talk • contribs) 21:01, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violations on pictures

Hi Yann,

As i am new to wikipedia, i am still learning about the different copyright rules and exceptions and etc..You guys have a fairly strict and sometimes confusing rules for internet content. I thought mentioning the website and naming the artist would be enough... But I'm learning from my mistakes, i'm seeking for artists authorization now. Anyway, sorry for the the inconvenience.

Sylvia Ines H — Preceding unsigned comment added by SYLVIA INES H (talk • contribs) 18:31, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

hardgaza

hi yann sorry they are my photos of me y can delete them if you want .

i thought tey might help other men like me with Klinefelter syndrome and a micro penis thanks for contacting me — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hardygaza (talk • contribs) 07:21, 30 January 2017 (UTC) yann no one has contacted me just delete them if you want thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hardygaza (talk • contribs) 07:26, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

dear Yann

Greetings, my friend Apologize to you for my poor English, but the pictures of the community and everywhere! In any case, I will work on what you said to me, i promis you ^^ Thank you so much for connect to me. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rayanx93 (talk • contribs) 01:14, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Разрешение на загрузку фото

Добрый день. Не знаю куда мне писать в "обсуждениях", чтобы мне позволили вернуть фото на страницу Гюли Камбарова

Я не опытный пользователь, но стараюсь выполнять указанный правила. Подскажите пожалуйста, если я загружаю фото из своего компьютера с разрешения автора, как ещё я могу доказать, что у меня есть это разрешение? Речь идёт о нескольких документах, подтверждающих информацию и о фотографии для самой статьи. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Анна Барсукова (talk • contribs)

Bilderlöschung wegen Lizenzfehler

Hallo Yann, Du hast mich am 18.12.2016 darauf aufmerksam gemacht, dass ich durch das Hochladen von Bildern Lizenzen verletzt habe. Zunächst einmal vielen Dank für Deinen Hinweis. Ich bin leider immer noch nicht so erfahren mit Wikipedia, wie ich mir das wünschen würde und brauche für manche Sachen ewig (ich komme auch nicht so oft in meinen Account, daher die späte Antwort). Und dann bin ich nicht einmal sicher, ob ich es wirklich richtig gemacht habe. Die Bilder hatte ich alle direkt hintereinander hochgeladen, also bevor ich von Dir und Ras67 benachrichtigt wurde. Ich weiß nicht mehr, was ich damals gemacht habe, aber ich habe mit den Rechteinhabern das Hochladen abgesprochen. Ich habe mich noch einmal versichert, es sollen als Lizenzen by-nc-sa3.0 und 4.0 angegeben werden. Benötige ich eine Art schriftliche Erklärung, oder eine andere Art von Beleg? Was war mein Fehler damals? Vielleicht kannst Du mir das noch einmal kurz schreiben, damit ich die Bilder erneut, aber diesmal lizenzkonform, einstellen kann. Vielen Dank! Dupond2011

Photo Affiche du manuel d'histoire critique du MONDE diplomatique au Festival International de 2014

Bonjour Yann,

Je suis l'auteur, avec mon appareil personnel, de la photo de l'affiche précitée du Monde diplomatique (comme le précise la mention "travail personnel". Merci de ne pas supprimer son insertion sur Wiki. J'envoie une demande formelle d'autorisation d'emploi (de mes photos par moi-même, on nage en plein ridicule !). Cordialement — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jihelpé (talk • contribs)

Photo Vitrine déodatienne durant le FIG 2016

Je suis l'auteur, avec mon appareil personnel, de la photo de l'affiche précitée du Festival international de Géographie (comme le précise la mention "travail personnel". Merci de ne pas supprimer son insertion sur Wiki. J'envoie une demande formelle d'autorisation d'emploi (de mes photos par moi-même, on nage en plein ridicule !). Cordialement — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jihelpé (talk • contribs)

Photo Salon du Livre des Balkans

Je suis co-organisateur du Salon du Livre des Balkans comme fondateur de l'Association Albania. Merci de ne pas supprimer l'insertion de l'affiche sur Wiki. J'envoie une demande formelle d'autorisation d'emploi.

Cordialement — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jihelpé (talk • contribs)

voir ma réponse sur la page d'aide

apparemment, la notif discrète ne marche pas sur la page d'aide. Merci de vous y reporter. Cordialement--Anglo-norman (talk) 22:17, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yann, Comme il est plus facile de discuter sur votre page, je vous joins, sur le conseil de mon administrateur, la liste des photos et leur statut : ...

Voilà le détail que Moumou82 me conseillait de lister. Il définit la licence PD-France comme à utiliser entre autres pour les photos de plus de 70 ans dont l'auteur est inconnu. Mes questions restent les mêmes, surtout pour les own work. Ellin me dit de passer par Commons OTRS, et eux que je peux enregistrer directement ! Bien sincèrement --Anglo-norman (talk) 05:24, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Anglo-norman : Inutile de répéter les informations à plusieurs endroits. Continuez ici : Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Anglo-norman‎. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 09:38, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Why "convert to DR" is disabled in Copyvio and Speedydelete?

Hi Yann, I wonder why "convert to DR" is disabled in {{Copyvio}} and {{Speedydelete}}? I can see them in their source. Jee 16:16, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, No idea. Was the template changed recently? Yann (talk) 16:18, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Not sure. Will ask at AN. Jee 16:29, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Message from Atomksk

Dear Yann, thank you for the message. I realize the licence is very difficult to choose, that is why I ask for your help. I had sent many files, but after, when the author of the files, Juliusz Multarzynski, sent me the mail with the permissions for using the files. I already sent the mail to Zezwolenia - Polskie projekty Wikimedia <permissions-pl@wikimedia.org>, due to previous instructions. What else should I do then?

I can send the files to other address, but let me know, what should I do - I have the written permission of the author.

The very best, Atomksk — Preceding unsigned comment added by Atomksk (talk • contribs) 19:43, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Atomksk: Hi,
If you have the ticket number, you can add {{OTRS received|id=<ticket number>}} to the description of each file, so the files won't be deleted for a while. Regards, Yann (talk) 21:56, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Yann, Thank you for the answer, but what is ticket number? I have the permission from the author and each file is signed, eg. Zdzislawa Donat 796-S6©Juliusz Multarzynski. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Atomksk (talk • contribs) 22:02, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Atomksk: Hi,
You don't need to ping me on my talk page.
I am not sure about the OTRS queue in Polish, but when you send a permission, you usually receive an automated message with a number. I can't understand Polish, but it seems it is 2017040810010828. Regards, Yann (talk) 22:15, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bogdan Zadorozhny, Writer and Entrepreneur cropped.jpg Deletion

Hi there,

I have sent in a Declaration of Consent as provided by the copyright owner to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org. Please advise how I should forward it to you to resolve this issue and restore the image file.

Cheers. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TorontonianOnlines (talk • contribs)

Template:Personality rights

Bonjour Yann,

Serait-il possible de corriger une faute de français sur le {{Personality rights}} fr ? Dans le texte orginal iles écrit 

« ...ou dans le domaine public, le ou les personnes représentées... »

par 

« ...ou dans le domaine public, la ou les personnes représentées... ».

Merci — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 15:03, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done Yann (talk) 15:28, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Vélodrome Brest Ponant Iroise

Which is the copyright violation? --Nicola (talk) 08:18, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Nicola,
Could you please precise which file you are talking about? Thanks, Yann (talk) 10:34, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Erawan Shrine, Ratchaprasong, May 2015.jpg

Hi Yann, you closed the undeletion review for this one as "not done : not deleted". You may have missed my previous note there in small print though, where I stated that I had undeleted this only for the sake of review. It was deleted before, so we still need to find out if this should permanently be deleted or if it can stay undeleted. De728631 (talk) 15:21, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
Right. A DR is better anyway: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Erawan Shrine, Ratchaprasong, May 2015.jpg (Commons:Undeletion requests/Archive/2017-04#File:Erawan Shrine, Ratchaprasong, May 2015.jpg). Regards, Yann (talk) 17:46, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, thank you. This is probably the best solution. De728631 (talk) 16:25, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding File:SereneAir AP-BNA at Boeing Field, Nov 2016.jpg

Hello, I noticed that you deleted File:SereneAir AP-BNA at Boeing Field, Nov 2016.jpg. However, I had placed {{subst:OP}} on the page because I had communicated with the photographer by e-mail; he told me which license to upload the photo under, and I provided him this link to complete. He then stated that he had completed that linked process. So I'm confused; did OTRS not get an e-mail from him granting permission? Regards — Sunnya343✈ (háblame • my work) 23:03, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Sunnya343,
There was an OTRS pending tag since February 6th, and the queue is "only" about 50 days old. Do you have the ticket number? Regards, Yann (talk) 10:36, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
That is interesting. No sorry I do not have the ticket number, as I had interacted with the photographer outside of Commons and I'm not on the OTRS team. I thought that the photographer had completed the process here as he had told me. If I forwarded my e-mail conversation with him to OTRS, would that help them see if he had released his permission? — Sunnya343✈ (háblame • my work) 14:35, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Sunnya343,
I did some research in OTRS, and I can't find any ticket related to this file or this author. The easiest way would that the author mentions a free license at the source. Regards, Yann (talk) 18:23, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your time. I will try reaching out to the photographer again. — Sunnya343✈ (háblame • my work) 16:05, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Drapeau de la Régence

Salut Nous avons besoin d'un médiateur. Pourriez-vous nous aider à parvenir à un compromis ? J'ai été insulté de vandale. --Panam2014 (talk) 14:08, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Salut. J'ai posté en PDD mais les contributeurs en question ne se justifient pas et ils m'insultent de vandale alors que je n'ai pas vandalisé. Ca ne dépend plus de moi. --Panam2014 (talk) 14:12, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Au passage, il a créé une requête aux opérateurs et il n'a pas voulu discuter en page de discussion. J'ai fait un signalement. --Panam2014 (talk) 14:27, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:KIJ ToToGa2.jpg

Salut, Yann. You deleted this file following a speedy deletion request with the only rationale "The source website re-uploaded photos belonging to third parties and can't claim any copyright on them." The file was originally posted at Tistory which hosts user-generated content. I think without solid evidence like a link to another page where the file was posted earlier without a free licence, it should not have been deleted at all. At least the speedy deletion should have been converted to regular DRs to claim evidence for this alleged licence laundering like you did with other files from this uploader. So please consider restoring this file. De728631 (talk) 14:58, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
OK, I restored the file and created a DR instead. I suspect all uploads by this user to be copyright violations, via license washing. Please see also Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Lovelovelove681. Regards, Yann (talk) 15:01, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. Let's see what we can find out with regards to licence laundering. And as far as it concerns you, I'd like to wish you a Happy Easter Weekend. De728631 (talk) 15:10, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Photo request copyright

The issue of copyright when one gives a camera to someone else to take a photo (usually of oneself) has been discussed I'm sure several times. Can you point me to where we have any guideline or FAQ on the issue? Is it a resolved question? -- Colin (talk) 19:53, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Colin,
Please see Commons:Own work/Bystander selfie and Commons:Village pump/Proposals#Bystander selfie. It is quite noticeable that there is no legal argument against this proposal. A few people oppose it, and Jcb is the first of them, but without any valid argument. Most of the others are not Commons contributors. On the other side, Carl Lindberg, who is much more knowledgeable about copyright issues supports the proposal with a complete and detailed legal analysis. Revent was the only one with a legal argument, but he was also refuted by Carl. IMHO Jcb is just being disruptive there, and try to enforce his own version of Commons policies against everyone else. Regards, Yann (talk) 00:11, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Missing Permission??

Hi there,

You tagged File:'15 Ford F-150 Crew Cab.jpg, File:'14-'15 Chevrolet Camaro RS Convertible.jpg and File:'05-'08 Toyota Corolla Laval Fire Department.jpg by Bull-Doser as "missing evidence of permission".

Perhaps I'm missing something, but I don't see the basis for that. It appears to me that Bull-Doser clearly claims that they're his (her?) own work and has released them as public domain. Unless any of that's in dispute, I don't see the issue.

All the best, Ubcule (talk) 21:41, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ubcule,
"All Rights Released." is a contradiction with the free license. In addition, these files are small and copied from Facebook. That's why a permission is needed, unless we get the original images. And please do not remove warnings on your own. If you disagree, please create a DR instead. Regards, Yann (talk) 00:03, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
(1) "All rights released" is entirely consistent with the free license. Perhaps you are confusing it with "all rights reserved", which means the complete opposite?
(2) How did you find out they were on Facebook? There don't seem to be any matches on Google Images or TinEye. Are you sure that they weren't uploaded there after they were uploaded here a couple of years ago?
I've never come across a case so far where an upload that Bull-Doser claimed as their "own work" could be shown not to be. (There were some problems with insufficient demonstration of permission for some uploads he made from other people, but those were all clearly labelled as being the work of someone else). As far as I'm aware, Bull-Doser has their own Facebook page, but even that doesn't prove where it was uploaded first.
(3) Please note that it wasn't me who removed the warnings- it can be clearly seen from [1], [2] and [3] that this was done by Wikicology. If you disagree with these edits, you should take it up with him/her instead. Ubcule (talk) 12:18, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Ubcule: Sorry about Released vs. Reserved, you are right. See the EXIF data with Facebook mark. Regards, Yann (talk) 12:23, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, I assume the "special instructions" are a proprietary Facebook tag? As I mentioned, Bull-Doser apparently uses Facebook and- I think- has uploaded some of his own stuff via there, but I've never come across anything to suggest that he's uploaded other people's images from there as "own work". Ubcule (talk) 12:42, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Review maybe

Yann would you consider reviewing your block of Lovelovelove681 (talk · contribs)? I have to say in your position I would have done exactly as you did however I also think it is possible that some of the files in the DR could be properly licensed (not all and I've added two I deleted speedily which I still think are probably copyvios). Equally if the people contributing to the source website would simply upload the files here they could be hosted without all this trouble. As to the block, I got an email from the user which looks like it explains one of the files licensing and I've posted on their talk page however actually dialogue from the user on the DR might help? If you aren't happy I assure you I would not mind at all - as I said I would have done the same as you. --Herby talk thyme 11:53, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Herbythyme,
I think I already answered on the user's talk page. Yes, I would remove the block if we have some proof that the licenses are valid, i.e. with a mail to OTRS, or the original images. Regards, Yann (talk) 12:01, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Yes thanks Yann - I saw your post after I posted here. Sorry to trouble you. --Herby talk thyme 12:02, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Communication

Your comment "You make a lot of bad assumptions here, and any collection of bad idea doesn't make a good one. I suggest you stop doing anything like this." is unspecific, unconstructive and dismissive. Please don't communicate like that with me. If there are specific facts I've got wrong, then detail them. People (yourself included) are making assumptions because we have not been told the whole story about the photographs. Commons relies on honesty and disclosure, not pretence and covering up. It is not the end of the world to admit you made a mistake. -- Colin (talk) 16:47, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Colin: Don't give me communication lesson. You are wrong on all points, no matter how you phrase it. Yann (talk) 16:50, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
If Mardetanha lent the camera to someone else to take some photos of their own choosing during the edit-a-thon, as they have stated earlier, then the photographer is the full copyright owner. You know this. I know this. Which part of that is "wrong on all points". -- Colin (talk) 18:03, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Featured picture closing mistake

Check the votes on this nomination. You can clearly see the bot made a mistake. How can a vote of 5 support and 1 oppose lead to a nomination not succeeding? I'm giving you the benefit of the doubt and say that you probably rushed this and didn't give it enough time to properly review the score before closing it as not featured, as ridiculous as that seems... -- PhilipTerryGraham (talk) 13:37, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

PhilipTerryGraham: Yes, you need at least 7 support votes to succeed. Regards, Yann (talk) 15:16, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

about you report that photo is not my own work

Hello, Yann,

Thanks for making the controls. I am authorized this photo by Chien Huan-Tsung, I ensure that I have 100% copyright. If you still confuse, welcome to dial number +886 7 551 5100 or +886 7 571 0035 to city councilor office. They will be very happy to answer you. Please restore Your" Deletion requests/File:簡煥宗.jpg"— Preceding unsigned comment added by Phoebe8674 (talk • contribs) 13:45, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Phoebe8674: Hi,
If an image was previously published elsewhere, a formal written permission is needed. Anyway, you have to provide evidence that the image is under a free license. If you are the photographer, please upload the original image with full EXIF data. Otherwise, please see COM:OTRS for the procedure. Regards, Yann (talk) 15:19, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Yann: hi, I quite understand your words. I am still learning about the different copyright rules and exceptions and etc.. You mean I have to upload my free license, where should I upload my massage? Could you give me a clue?

If you could help, it would be great. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Phoebe8674 (talk • contribs) 03:10, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Missing permission instead of copyright violations

Hi Yann,

You have tagged 10 of my images as copyright violations and nominated them for deletion. All these photos were uploaded with with the permission of their owners. So could you please use "missing evidence of permission" tags instead of the deletion requests for all the images that you mentioned on my talk page? So I will have 7 days to get a proof that the author agreed to license the file under the given license. Otherwise the file can be deleted in a week without discussion. Have agreed? Alexandra Goncharik (talk)

Yann, truly speaking, I doubt that we need "missing evidence of permission" tag here. Wikipedia Commons requires to show evidence of permission by either providing a link to a site with an explicit release under a free license or by sending a declaration of consent. My images were published on a site with an explicit release under a free license. As far as I understand, this website don't have to comply with all the requirements to a reliable source for Wikipedia articles. For example, a portrait of a person could be published in his/her Facebook, Flickr or Pinterest profile with a free license notice. All these websites are not reliable sources for Wikipedia, however they are OK as an evidence of permission. The same for archive.org that I used as a source. You can contact all copyright owners that I indicated on archive.org to be sure that they granted their permission. We have no signs of copyright infringement here. Please let me know how we can solve this issue and leave the images in Wikipedia Commons. Alexandra Goncharik (talk) 23:26, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Alexandra Goncharik,
Anyone can upload anything under any name to Internet Archive. So IA is not a valid source for free content unless it can be demonstrated by another mean that it is in the public domain or under a free license. That's why a permission via OTRS is necessary. In addition you need a formal written permission when you upload any content created by somebody else. Yes, I could also use "missing evidence of permission", but the result is the same: you have a week to send a permission. Once it is done, please add {{OTRS pending}} in the description of each file. Please tell me if you need any help. Regards, Yann (talk) 23:59, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I see. Thanks for the explanation, Yann. So I will ask for the written permission to save these images.Alexandra Goncharik (talk) 15:04, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Dear Yann, thank you again for the detailed instructions, they helped me a lot. I got the written permission for 8 images of 10 and added {{OTRS pending}} in the description of these 8 files. I will need a few more days to reach the copyright holder of the last 2 images. Please, let me know how to proceed. Should I just wait until somebody marks each "pending" photo as "OTRS received". Right? Best regards, Alexandra Goncharik (talk) 23:08, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pictures which not allowed

Hay, I red your comment on my value שרה גלבוע I got many difficalties to write in English. All the rights of the pictures belong to me and my sister. We saw the contract and it says that we agry everybody to use the pictures - we can not accept making other use out of wikipedia. I did not had the time to look for another agriment that can protect our rights. I spend a lot of effort to write the value and I will do much work on it. I am new and it is very difficalt to make the first steps. I hope the value will not be deleted. I have to find the solution. Thank you for understanding. Liora Gilboa--ליאורהגלבוע (talk) 07:07, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi ליאורהגלבוע,
Please see a permission via COM:OTRS. Regards, Yann (talk) 21:07, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I have had the copyright document for all recent uploads that i made

I have had the copyright document for all recent uploads that i made

Will use them in future along with images.

Regards, Anjunaid — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anjunaid (talk • contribs) 06:10, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Anjunaid: Hi,
The copyright is owned by the photographer, unless there is a specific written contract saying otherwise. Please send a permission via COM:OTRS. Regards, Yann (talk) 21:05, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Renommages en cascade

Salut Yann,

Je suis à la recherche d'un administrateur francophone pour répondre à une requête que j'avais posé en mars dernier sur Administrators' noticeboard et sur le Bistro et qui était resté sans suite. Je te la retranscris ici:

Pour corriger des erreurs, à la suite du renommage du fichier File:Nathan Beaulieu WJC12 press conference.jpg en File:Ryan Murray WJC12 press conference.jpg, il faudrait supprimer la redirection pour pouvoir corriger le nom du fichier File:Jonathan Huberdeau WJC12 press conference.jpg (qui représente en fait Nathan Beaulieu), puis en faire de même avec ce dernier pour renommer le fichier File:Quinton Howden WJC12 press conference.jpg (qui représente Jonathan Huberdeau).

En résumé, il faudrait faire:

Pourrais-tu t'en charger?

Cordialement.--Bounè rodzo (talk) 08:25, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done Yann (talk) 21:17, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

copyright approval in Ticket#: 2017040510019932

Yann, please take a look at Ticket:2017040510019932 and undelete the images. I've no idea howto undelete files. As a result the wiki article makes no sense without the images. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rweldam (talk • contribs) 11:42, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done Yann (talk) 21:13, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

João Víctor Bomfim da Silva

Hi Yann, I uploaded six images from the internet and I was warned about the copyright terms because I was not aware of it before. And that last image I uploaded was made by myself from a screenshot while I was watching a game. So I didn't used an image made by someone else. — Preceding unsigned comment added by João Víctor Bomfim da Silva (talk • contribs) 14:50, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment User blocked for repeated copyvios. Yann (talk) 21:13, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Suppression

Bonjour,

aucun souci sur les suppressions, j'étais en lien avec le club des Dragons Catalans et leurs services de com', au final ils ont reculé et j'ai oublié de faire supprimer les photos, mes excuses. --Chaps the idol (talk) 19:53, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Krzysztof Pastor, photo Łukasz Murgrabia.tif

Hello, I would like to ask, what was wrong with the permission I have sent? I have followed the instructions on polish Wikipedia sites, the file appeared again, but with a note that the permission was not sufficient. Please let me know, what should I do about it. --Bebronka (talk) 20:58, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Bebronka,
Please wait for the permission to be processed. There is always quite a backlog, so it can take some time. I don't read Polish, so I can't help you more. Regards, Yann (talk) 21:03, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Picture removed because of copyright violations?

I don't understand why my photos of actor Duncan Chow were removed by Wiki? You required me evidence for copyrights?? How can I find it? I am just a normal fan and I just took photos of my idol. Because Duncan Chow's profile does not have any picture so I upload my photo of him to WIKI. Can you tell me how can I add a profile picture for him? Much appreciate! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nguyenthikimhoa (talk • contribs) 06:51, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Nguyenthikimhoa: Hi,
These pictures were copied from Facebook, so they are not your pictures. You are not allowed to upload images without a formal written permission from the copyright owner, i.e. usually the photographer. Please see COM:OTRS for the procedure to send a permission. Regards, Yann (talk) 09:07, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Adolf de Meyer

Salut, Yann. For your information, I have undeleted all files in Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:L´après-midi d´un faune by Adolf de Meyer because they have become PD this year. De728631 (talk) 12:43, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Remove Images

Hi Yann!

Can you remove my uploaded Images, please? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Malek79i (talk • contribs) 16:31, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Malek79i: Hi,
Please create a deletion request. Regards, Yann (talk) 20:31, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Margaret (Małgorzata Jamroży) By Daniel Åhs Karlsson (edited).jpg

Hi, you have decided to keep that photo, however there is a very similar version of it under that link, which is in use, so I don't see a point of actually keeping it. ArturSik (talk) 18:04, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi ArturSik,
OK very similar. Now that we have it, deleting it would not save any place. Actually I find this crop slightly better (more space in the direction she is looking). Regards, Yann (talk) 20:29, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Konzentrazionslager.png

Hi, please be careful when to refer to and when not to refer to {{Grandfathered}}. In this case it obviously cannot be applied. The grandfathered guideline is not a blank permission to prevent deletion of any old upload. Jcb (talk) 22:02, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Do you have any evidence that this map is not self-made? Yann (talk) 16:14, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The base map seems scanned from a book. See e.g. the coastlines of Sweden showing that the way of printing in different colors was not yet so sophisticated as what you would see with the current equipment. The skulls and bones may well have been added by the uploader. I have seen many 'own work' claims where they uploader in fact made a DW. Jcb (talk) 16:22, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Permission

Hi, can you tell me why you think there is "obviously" no permission required for pictures like this file and this one? According to the metadata the photographer (not the same as the one who uploaded this pic) even claims copyrights for this one and yet you decide it doesn't need permission. Ronn (talk) 15:50, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ronn,
These are very simple utilitarian objects, which are not under a copyright in most part of the world. So unless there is a real proof of a copyright, I don't think a permission is necessary. There was recently a similar case on COM:UDR with Italian furniture, and it was decided that a permission is not needed. Regards, Yann (talk) 15:54, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The images themselves seem to have been grabbed from the web though, see e.g. here. Jcb (talk) 16:07, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
OK, so I created a DR: Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Sannevanengen. Regards, Yann (talk) 16:13, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Koppelman images

Hello,

I looked though the other uploads from Carl Koppelman's art and have requested that he send permission for all of the remaining images that are in the same situation as the ones you nominated recently. Please hold off on the deletion nominations - OTRS permission is in the works. Thanks, Gourami Watcher (talk) 19:15, 2 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Demande de supression

Bonjour Yann, pourrais-tu supprimer ce fichier File:Glam_on_Tour_Fribourg_Musée_Gutemberg_01.jpg. Je ne sais pas comment faire et je l'ai importé par erreur..--Nattes à chat (talk) 08:41, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Fait Yann (talk) 10:30, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks ever so much… --Nattes à chat (talk) 10:51, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Undeletion request

Hello, Yann— have an undeletion request for you: File:Out of the Ordinary.jpg. We now have a permission statement under OTRS ticket:2017040610004615. Ping me if you would to let me know you have undeleted so that I can check out the uploader's details and assign the image its ticket number. Thanks! KDS4444 (talk) 10:19, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@KDS4444: OK, done. Yann (talk) 10:34, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright owner for photos

I'm sorry you feel I am being belligerent. I am the owner of these photographs. I am a professional commercial photographer. am not completely familiar with Wikipedia nor its terms. I am simply trying to contribute to this article. If you'd like proof of ownership of the images, just let me know what you need. Good day, Rick Lohre — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 2605:A000:161D:C068:CC56:A19C:97A4:6848 (talk) 00:43, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
Please send a permission via COM:OTRS. Regards, Yann (talk) 07:07, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Photos de Orrling

Tu te souviens de Orrling?

Bien. Donnes un coup d'oeuil à ticket:2017031210011401 : j'ai l'impression que les photos exotiques qu'il a publié à son nom sont en fait prises d'autres sources et auto-attribuées. Avant d'ouvrir un signalement général, il serait bien d'évaluer l'étendue des dégâts potentiels avant. À la limite on reprends la discussion sur OTRS-wiki ou sur IRC un de ces soirs. --Ruthven (msg) 12:26, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour Ruthven,
Merci pour le message. Problématique en effet. Beaucoup de ses images n'ont pas de données EXIF, ça ne va pas être simple de faire le tri... :/ Bon courage. Yann (talk) 13:19, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

license photos File:Operafest.jpg

Good evening. You have marked my photos as copyright infringement and nominate them for deletion. All these pictures have been uploaded with the permission of their owners. Since my organization is a partner of this festival (the logo is available on the poster). Materials downloaded from the site http://operafest-tulchyn.blogspot.com (which I am). Tell me what kind of license should I use in the future. I'm still not good in the variety of licenses and have problems with the English language. Thank you very much. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Oliko1 (talk • contribs) 16:53, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Oliko1: Hi,
As for any content previously published elsewhere, a formal written permission is needed. Please see COM:OTRS for the procedure. The files can be restored once the permission is validated. Regards, Yann (talk) 17:22, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of authorship information

In this edit you replaced the name of the creator of the depicted artwaork with «Artwork : to be identified». Why? -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 21:36, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I reverted your removal of the license, but I changed also this by error. Regards, Yann (talk) 22:27, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violations

Hi Yann, I saw your message on my talk page and I have some questions.. even if I uploaded lot of images on WikiCommons, they were often election maps and potraits of politicians, with a clear and simple copyright. Probably your warning was about the last logos that I uploaded and, about this, my question: is how can I know which copyright is the correct one? And why "PD-textlogo" and "trademarked" weren't correct? Thank you -- Nick.mon -- 11:57, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Nick.mon: The source link for File:Enrico La Loggia.jpg is dead. Are you sure this was released under a free license? The logos may indeed be PD-textlogo. Please ask for undeletion on COM:UDR. Unless @Daphne Lantier: agree to undelete them? Regards, Yann (talk) 12:03, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Well, the source link for La Loggia I think was this one from the official website of Italian Chamber of Deputies; otherwise it was my fault. Anyway thank for you explanation :) -- 12:47, 6 May 2017 (UTC)
@Nick.mon: OK, it working now, but I don't see any evidence of a free license. Regards, Yann (talk) 13:40, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The correct license is "dati.camera.it" which is used for all the official portraits of Italian deputies. -- Nick.mon 16:25, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Nick.mon: "dati.camera.it" is not a license. We need a free license (see it:Licenza libera). Regards, Yann (talk) 16:31, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted files: Ewa Podles 816-158©Juliusz Multarzynski.jpg and other files

Dear Yann, why you removed my uploaded files (Ewa Podles by Juliusz Multarzynski)? The written permission was sent already DIRECTLY by the author, Juliusz Moltarzynski to a OTRS (permissions-commons-pl@wikimedia.org)? I wrote it few times and I have resent the written permission. Why you deleted the files? What else I should do? Do you want the copy of permission?

Let me know, please,--Atomksk (talk) 10:01, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Atomksk,
The files I deleted didn't have any permission. @Ankry: Do you know what's going on? Also Jcb deleted some files which were mentioned as copyright by Juliusz Moltarzynski, which is very unlikely, seeing the date (early 20th century). These could be restored if you provide some information. Regards, Yann (talk) 10:24, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
There is backlog in the permissions-pl queue. And the permissions are mostly not trivial. Ankry (talk) 10:54, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I have re-sent the written permission of the author, Juliusz Multarzynski, to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org. Please undelete and restore the files
@Ankry: Ankry, can you please help? I know there is a queue, but it really takes too much time and there is a misunderstanding. The permission is written by the author of the photos. --Atomksk (talk) 17:17, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Atomksk: You don't need to ping me on my own talk page. Ankry is an admin, so he can undelete the files when he validates the permission. Regards, Yann (talk) 22:53, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Atomksk: Tickets with attachements, without clickable links to files in permissions and especially if there is more than one ticket concerning single file are painful and require more time than I can spend for OTRS. I am sorry, but they need to be sorted out by somebody else. Ankry (talk) 05:49, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Ankry: The files were sent with the permission. Should I send it once again file by file? I understand it needs time, but who can help me? Can you as admin manage the process, please? Can anybody help? --Atomksk (talk) 08:36, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Atomksk: No idea. Ask me in June. Preferably on my talk page, not Yann's. Or ask another OTRS agent. Ankry (talk) 08:55, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Aus der Tiefen and the Lewis image

Hi, Yann!! Hope all is well on your end. My purpose in contacting you now is in regards to the image File:HarryRLewis_Harvard_demonstrating_SHAPESHIFTER_1967or1968.jpg and I ask that you please read my comment on EEng's TP. Under copyright laws that were in effect before 1978, a work that was published without copyright notice fell into the public domain. As I explained at the user's TP, the image which is owned by Harry R. Lewis per the image upload information was actually published courtesy of Harry R. Lewis in the Harvard Magazine back in 1974, I believe. The image did not have any copyright notices on it, therefore it is considered a published work (See Kernal Records Oy v. Mosley,794 F. Supp.2d 1355, 1364 (S.D. Fla. 2011). Citing Getaped.com, Inc., the Eastern District of Arkansas found that photographs that were accessible online to others who could download them freely were published.) That image is in the public domain because it failed the requirements for copyright. Atsme 📞 02:49, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Atsme,
That could very well be a reason to be in the public domain, but it is not what EEng says until now, and it is not the license mentioned in the file page. Regards, Yann (talk) 07:19, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I'll see if he will be amenable to having it uploaded under such a license. Thank you. Atsme 📞 09:15, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Another undeletion request

Category:Missiehuis Sint Michaël, Tegelen is no longer empty; please undelete it. --R'n'B (talk) 13:15, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done Yann (talk) 13:46, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Excuse me, I am the one who took this picture's original photograph

File:A_beach_at_Port_Dickson_1.jpg

I was this picture's original photographer. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yjfstorehouse (talk • contribs) 15:25, 9 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Yjfstorehouse: Hi,
Yes, but since it was previously published on Facebook, you need to send a permission, or better, upload the original picture on Commons. Regards, Yann (talk) 15:34, 9 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy del request vs. DEL request process vs. COM's AN

I never thought until now that AN is the quickest and most efficient way to handle a lot of images. However, how do I at discretion handle one image or multiple images? Some or many DEL request pages receive very little attention. --George Ho (talk) 21:24, 10 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi George,
There is no definitive answer. Do you know Help:VisualFileChange.js? Commons is severely understaffed, and we always have a huge backlog of copyright violations, detected and waiting to be deleted (less now that it used to be), or waiting to be detected. So yes, may DEL requests are not reviewed by anyone, except the admin closing it. Comparing to the English Wikipedia which has a similar traffic, we have around 5 times less admins, and many of them are not active. I saw recently that we have around 70,000 files copied from Facebook, and most of them are either copyvios or out of scope, or both. BTW you should candidate for adminship. Regards, Yann (talk) 23:13, 10 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Hmm... not just OTRS understaffed... but Commons too? I see some mentioning of "understaffed" and "backlog". I already raised the backlogging of OTRS at Meta-wiki. May I go to Village Pump or Meta-wiki to address the Commons backlogging? Thanks for giving me the admins offer, but... I think I must pass for now. I have a lot in my mind and must find ways to ease my activities here. --George Ho (talk) 00:39, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Regarding the backlogging and understaffing, Commons and other projects are interdependent on each other. Seems that such issue will severely affect the projects because local wikis have been encouraging free content as always. --George Ho (talk) 00:57, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Undeleted some files uploaded by Vpe (suite)

Bonjour Yann,
Je me permet de revenir vers toi concernant le sujet des affiches électorales. Le but de ma démarche n'étant ni politique, ni personnel mais dans un esprit de clarification pour la communauté et dans ce cas dans adapter les règles se référant au sujet dans la mesure où il peut évoluer. J'ai été rechercher dans nos textes administratifs ce qui pourrait nous être utile pour mieux comprendre ce sujet, dans l'ordre :

  • La réglementation du Cncc, qui nous rappelle les principaux textes fondateurs ;
  • Chapitre III : L’affichage du conseil-constitutionnel, qui nous fournit des indications sur la liberté de la presse en application de la Loi du 29 juillet 1881 ;
  • l'article 15 suivant la Loi. Heureusement pour nous le texte est court et précise les modalités sur l'affichage et les dégradations ;
  • le traitement et valorisation d'un fonds d'affiches qui représente un mémoire sur le sujet traitant en page 57 du « paradoxe des affiches électorales » et conclut par : En effet, au nom de la liberté d’information, la jurisprudence considère que « la publication de personnes directement impliquées dans un évènement est licite », sous la seule réserve du respect de la dignité de la personne humaine. On peut donc considérer que les affiches politiques illustrées de la photographie des candidats entrent dans ce cadre-là.

Entre temps, le fichier Affiches électorales 2012.JPG, pour lequel j'avais demandé une révision de situation a été effacé pour cause de copyright.

Concernant, le fichier Montpellier montage couv.jpg : Je l'ai repris sur la base de certains fichiers sources (pour ne pas les avoir tous trouvé) et j'y ai adjoint des fichiers complémentaires mais le résultat ne me convient pas pleinement à cause de la photo Hôtel de Ville de Montpellier dont je ne suis pas sûr de la légalité. A ce titre, j'ai été reprendre des photos en ville pour trouver dans les architectures anciennes un sujet représentatif et valorisant pour la ville, que je pense avoir trouvé à cette heure. Juste quelques manipulations pour régénérer un fichier viable !

Concernant, le fichier Montpellier-fac droit bat2.jpg : J'ai été reprendre des photos mais d'importants feuillages empêchent une prise de vue adaptée.
Concernant, le fichier Cloitre fac droit montpellier.jpg : J'ai également pris quelques photos mais pas depuis l'étage comme sur la photo en cours car cette personne travaille sur les lieux.

Actuellement, je suis en train de faire les plans d'accès et de représentations des bâtiments des facultés de Montpellier afin d'établir une meilleure représentation des sites. Et, j'ai quelques dizaines de photos, dont certaines intéressantes, à uploader !

Voici, mes petits nouvelles d'actualités sur les sujets ! Cordialement, —— DePlusJean (talk) 16:48, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour DePlusJean,
Mais la loi sur la liberté de la presse n'est pas le problème. Et donc tous les textes que tu cites n'ont rien à voir. Il s'agit uniquement de la question du droit d'auteur sur 1. les sujets photographiés, 2. les photos elles-mêmes. Si Vpe ne donne aucune information, les images ne seront de toute façon pas restaurées. Il vaut donc mieux que tu refasses les montages à partir de tes propres images. Si elles incluent des bâtiments récents, il faut mettre les photos et le montage sur Wikipédia en français et non sur Commons. Et oublie les affiches électorales, elles ne peuvent pas être publiées sans un accord des auteurs, ce qui est quasiment impossible. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 18:45, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Bonsoir Yann,
Je te remercie des informations ci-dessus dont j'en prends bonne note. J'ai refait le photo montage pour la ville de Montpellier en restant sur l'idée de base de Vpe et en modifiant les photos litigieuses ou ambiguës. Effectivement, je confirme que : trier, déposer, géolocaliser, décrire, catégoriser, traduire, annoter, lier… représente un plein temps d'activité et non une anecdote de quelques minutes. J'ai été reprendre des photos de quelques lieux parmi la liste ci-dessus et je les déposerai sur Commons dès que possible. Merci encore de ton amabilité et disponibilité.
Cordialement, —— DePlusJean (talk) 17:15, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Salut.

Un mot pour signaler Commons:Deletion requests/File:Monument aux morts Aranc 01.jpg. Bonne journée.--Classiccardinal (talk) 05:20, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour Yann,
Je développe un peu le signalement de Classic. Comment ne pas faire de rapprochement avec ce débat que tu connais bien Commons:Deletion requests/File:Monument aux morts Aranc 01.jpg alors même que Classic y a participé et que l'auteur de la photo n'est autre...que Classic. Si encore les monuments ciblés avaient quelques originalités...il y a des monuments aux morts, y compris dans l'Ain (le département de toutes ces demandes intempestives), pour lesquels le maintien ou non dans Commons est une question qui peut se poser. Mais là ? (???).
Mon opinion est que le temps des mesures coercitives est venue au risque sinon de voir diminuer l'implication de contributeurs investis en particulier sur ce territoire (l'Ain particulièrement couvert par Chabe01, Classiccardinal, moi même...voir à ce propos Category:April 2017 in Ain), contributeurs pourtant très respectueux des règles. Nous n'avons aucun mal à comprendre la suppression de nos photos quand la contravention au droit d'auteur dans le pays concerné est manifeste : j'ai le cas en ce moment avec une ou deux de mes photos ici Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Your Rainbow Panorama, je les supprimerais moi même si je le pouvais.
Bref. Après avoir développer une nécessaire patience et ouverture, je suggère de mettre un coup d'arrêt à ce qui ressemble de plus en plus à de la désorganisation.
Bien à toi, --Benoît Prieur (d) 05:40, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Bonjour Classiccardinal, Benoît Prieur,
C'est un nouvel utilisateur qui n'a pas compris le concept de de minimis, ni de seuil d'originalité. Je lui ai mis un mot. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 14:06, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I'm working on getting copyright for my images!

Hi, Yann!

Thank you for notifying me that my message violate copyright. I will contact the owners (I work with them directly), and they will send permission via email.

If you could update my profile considering this update, that would be greatly appreciated! Solutiondropsam (Solutiondropsam) 14:51, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Solutiondropsam,
The files can be restored when the permission is accepted. Regards, Yann (talk) 06:38, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright ownership

Dear Yann,

I' am writing to you concerning copyright ownership. Photos File:Linda Liepiņa.jpg, File:Atis-Zakatistovs.jpg with all the articles I've put into Wikipedia have been deleted, because I do not have the right to make copies. How can I get this right, or should I format Wiki articles somehow differently, because these photos have sources, they are authentic.

Yours Faithfully, Eduards776 — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 46.109.37.200 (talk) 22:00, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Eduards776: Hi,
File:Linda Liepiņa.jpg is copied from Twitter, and File:Atis-Zakatistovs.jpg has a watermark. Please the copyright owners of these pictures to send a permission via COM:OTRS. Regards, Yann (talk) 06:37, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:David Epston.jpg‬

Bonjour Yann, j'ai demandé à David Epston de transmettre un copyright agreement à permissions-commons@wikimedia.org en mettant la photo en pièce jointe. Il l'a fait cette nuit, sachant qu'il habite en Nouvelle-Zélande, c'était peut-être demain :) Donc, quelle est l'étape suivante ? Puis-je finalement uploader et utiliser cette photo ? Cordialement, Fabrice Faimetti (talk) 17:23, 10 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour Faimetti,
OTRS a une longue liste d'attente, particulièrement en anglais (environ 50 jours). Merci d'être patient. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 17:26, 10 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Faimetti (talk) 07:03, 13 May 2017 (UTC)Merci Yann ![reply]

Triborg

Hi, Yann - I have a question about File:Triborg.png which says it was uploaded by the image owner. Can you tell me if permissions received the necessary information to clear this image of potential copyvio? A new user created the article Triborg (En WP) which is totally unsourced, and uses that particular image. Thanks in advance for your help. Atsme 📞 00:24, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Atsme,
Yes, this image looks a bit suspicious to me. Please create a deletion request. Regards, Yann (talk) 14:02, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Yann, I did as you advised. Question - if the image is being used on en.wikipedia, is it allowed to remain in light of a potential copyvio? I attempted to remove the image from the Triborg article, but an IP and a new user with 19 edits played the revert game. I don't have time for games. The article Mortal Combat X uses quite a few "fair use" images, so maybe that would be an alternate route for this one? Atsme 📞 15:19, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, I don't edit much Wikipedia, so you have to see there by yourself. Regards, Yann (talk) 17:05, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Antonino Fogliani

Dear Yann, I'm Antonino Fogliani, I have the copyright of photos that I upload in my wiki pages. I want to update the photos of my page.

Thanks

Antonino Fogliani — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 51.175.146.166 (talk) 23:19, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Do you call this edit good customer service?   — Jeff G. ツ 23:49, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Musikaf: Hi,
Sorry, but no. Metadata of File:Antonino Fogliani.jpg shows that the author is Pietro Rocchetta Casadio, and it is tagged as "Foto Casadio © 2017". So please ask this person to send a permission via COM:OTRS. Regards, Yann (talk) 06:33, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I'm very sorry, but I pay Casadio for this photos and I have the permission to use this without other steps... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Musikaf (talk • contribs) 08:22, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Musikaf: Hi,
A formal written permission is needed for any content when the uploader is not the author. Thanks, Yann (talk) 08:31, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pandurahk

all the pictures that I upload is given by the actress herself. i didn't break any rules ,only i am not familiar to use wikipedia — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pandurahk (talk • contribs) 09:01, 13 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Pandurahk: Hi,
Please ask the photographer to send a permission via COM:OTRS. Regards, Yann (talk) 09:26, 13 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dsk11.jpg

Dear Sir, The photo of Daya Shankar Kulshreshtha that I loaded up with his permission, at his request, with his transfer of all rights on the photo to me, Asympto, has been removed several times. Please leave it in. Here is the Wiki ticket:2017012010011792. I hope and wish the deletion would stop. Please, Sir, help us!!!1 Thank you very much!!!! Yours sincerely, Asympto/Harald J.W. Müller-Kirsten, May 13, 2017. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Asympto (talk • contribs) 15:41, 13 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I do not have access to this ticket. There is a huge backlog in the OTRS queue, so please be patient. Regards, Yann (talk) 16:30, 13 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

my pics

Hello Yann, i answered on my discussion page https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Ziltoidium#Urheberrechtsverletzungen--Ziltoidium (talk) 18:33, 13 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete request for ABC 7 News Crew

The image in question was captured personally by me. I do not know what you mean when you say "It was copied fro Facebook". Could you please be clear? I can upload it to Flickr and provide proper rights if that's what you mean. Please get back to me on this ASAP.

This is the request I'm talking about: Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Abc7nyc.jpg --Deadly437 (talk) 05:10, 14 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Deadly437,
The EXIF data shows that it is copied from Facebook (FBMD* is added by Facebook). Please upload the original file, or send a permission via COM:OTRS, as for any content previously published elsewhere. Regards, Yann (talk) 09:40, 14 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I have sent an email to OTRS releasing the copyright. For your reference, this is the ticket number: #2017051510022087. For a temporary time I have a placeholder image of a lower resolution. When my request is approved, I will restore my previous image. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Deadly437 (talk • contribs) 23:09, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Modernrocker4

Hello, Why did you delete my pic? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Modernrocker4 (talk • contribs) 13:37, 14 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Modernrocker4: Hi,
Because 1. You didn't answer in Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Modernrocker4; 2. These are small files without EXIF data. 3. At least 2 of them are copyright violations: File:YUSC.jpg, File:Maxcement.jpg.
Please get a permission from the copyright owner before uploading files. Then send the permission as explained on COM:OTRS.
For your own pictures, upload the original unmodified images with complete EXIF data. Regards, Yann (talk) 18:34, 14 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

New account wants to upload a new version

I've encouraged the author of File:Matterhorn sunset 2016 (Unsplash).jpg to join Commons and he's willing to upload a higher resolution / higher quality version of the file. He's created an account User:SamuelFerrara but when he goes to the page is says "You cannot overwrite this file". Is this because their account is too new? Is there a way to give them permission, or do they have to simply make other edits for a while until their account matures? What's the rule? -- Colin (talk) 21:08, 14 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Yes, new account can't overload files. The account needs to be autoconfirmed to do so. Regards, Yann (talk) 21:28, 14 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:® DENIA F.G.F. MONTGO PANORAMA - panoramio (9).jpg

Why you deleted good image? Even in your uploads easy to find much worse photos... /St1995 22:57, 14 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Good image? You must be joking... Yann (talk) 14:07, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ticket:2017032410021583

Salut, j'ai remarqué que ce ticket n'a pas reçu de réponse, mais tu as inséré l’autorisation dans les fichiers. C'est un oubli ou tu voulais répondre plus tard? J'ai aussi vu que permissions-fr avait pas mal de tickets non répondus, quand il y a quelques semaines elle était "en bonne santé" ; tu sais ce qui se passe?

Bonne journée! :-) Ruthven (msg) 10:58, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour,
Je ne me souviens pas, mais c'est probablement un oubli, maintenant réparé. Curieusement, le client dit que le logo a été effacé, mais ce compte n'a importé aucun logo.
L'équipe OTRS francophone est très réduite. Si par hasard, les volontaires sont absents en même temps, la liste s'allonge soudain. Heureusement, il n'y a pas tant de tickets que ça, et tout est rapidement rentré dans l'ordre. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 14:13, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Copyrighted material without permission

Hello,

I don't think you saw my notification about some pictures that should have been deleted, since the material is copyrighted and the uploader doesn't know if this could be released under a free license since the photographer is unknown.

BR, --AntonierCH (d) 20:10, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, There are DRs for which we assume good faith from the uploader, and this is one of the case. Thanks, Yann (talk) 10:25, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Yann/archives_35&oldid=246227165"