User talk:Yann/archives 18

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search


File:Son Servera 03 ies.jpg

Hello, you wrote [1] that you kept one image. But you deleted the image for which I wrote that it falls under FoP-Spain. As I remember the deleted File:Son Servera 03 ies.jpg only shows a part of File:Son Servera 01 ies.jpg (which was not nominated for deletion by nobody, but you added "kept" [2]). I think this is confusing a bit. Can you look again and restore perhaps? Holger1959 (talk) 19:41, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ah ok. Effectively, I was confused. Restored. Yann (talk) 19:49, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
thank you! Holger1959 (talk) 03:25, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Vanoot59

Thanks. I reached the same conclusion you did in your comment -- that the DR was a mess and I was slowly working though them.

When we get DRs like this one, I'd like to do a speedy keep and tell the nom to bring it back in pieces with a little more research. Trouble with that, though, is that the nom may not bother to bring it back, in which case the problems that are in the DR will remain on Commons. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:48, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Etnoscienses.png

Ready, pelase see if all is Ok. Thanks for your advise Ezarateesteban 13:43, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Images de Temoudje sans licence

Bonjour,

Je viens de voir le message que tu as laissé sur la PDD de Temoudje à propos d'images sans licence. Cette utilisatrice a à priori quitté Commons mais je suis repassé sur la plupart des versement qu'elle a réalisés quand elle était en stage à la bibliothèque de Brest et j'ai pu supprimer un bandeau de licence par inadvertance (on m'a signalé un cas ce midi). Ta remarque concernait-elle un autre fichier que File:Rhodymenia palmata.jpg ? J'ai lancé un CatScan mais je n'en ai pas trouvé d'autre. --EdouardHue (talk) 18:24, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

@EdouardHue: Oui. cf. Category:Media without a license: needs history check. Perso, je prefererai que le modele {{Album de plantes marines naturelles}} soit substitué ({{subst:Album de plantes marines naturelles}}). Tu devrais pouvoir trouver les fichiers sans licence avec [3]. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 18:46, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Bonjour à vous,

Je n'ai pas vraiment quitté Commons, j'ai juste un peu mis mon activité entre parenthèses, pour cause de travail intense (et de changement d'emploi). Je vais corriger ces problèmes de licence. Temoudje [Oook ?] 10:54, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Biografía.pdf

Concerning this — it was a misworded closing remark: This file should be deleted because it is a PDF, outside the narrow scope of acceptable PDF files. It is not out of scope (subject is a documentary film director mentioned in several articles of w:es), and its contents would have been accepted as in scope should they had been presented as separate images files and text in w:es. -- Tuválkin ✉ 19:40, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Suppressions

Merci beaucoup, par contre, j'avoue ne pas comprendre certaines suppressions :

Merci de votre attention, Vanoot59 (talk) 15:28, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

@Jameslwoodward: Do you agree to restore some these pictures? Se above. Thanks? Yann (talk) 16:12, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I have commented above in italics. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:21, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
@Vanoot59: Certaines images ont besoin d'information supplémentaires :
Cordialement, Yann (talk) 16:12, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Pour Pacifique de Valigny, je sais qu'il est mort en 1943, mais c'est tout... Pour Sixte-Henri de Bourbon Parme je vais facilement retrouver mais pour Emmanuel Lafont, j'avais eu l'autorisation sur un chat puis par mail, mais je pense l'avoir supprimé, je vais voir... merci encore ! Vanoot59 (talk) 16:28, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

La License est bien en bas, à gauche, non ? http://www.sylmpedia.fr/index.php/Fichier:Renouvin.jpg Vanoot59 (talk) 16:38, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

@Vanoot59: Cette photo vient de [4], d'ou elle a été copiée sur sylmpedia.fr. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 16:43, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

2014 restorations

If you're going to do more than a very few of these -- like Commons:Deletion requests/File:The-head-of-the-holy-loch.jpg‎, could you mark them as minor, please? I can see my watchlist with hundreds of restorations.....

Thanks, .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:59, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You were a little bit early with restoring the Vigeland pictures, there is still 18 minutes left right now. :-) But then I will upload my bunch now as well. Happy new year. Haros (talk) 22:43, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Photos sur la page du général PE Jacquot sans licence

Bonjour,

je me permets de vous contacter (avec du mal, je n'ai pas l'habitude d'utiliser les outils de discussions)car je ne comprend toujours pas pourquoi vous avez fait supprimer 7 photos qui illustraient la page sur mon grand-père depuis maintenant 3 ans.

Comme je l'avais indiqué dans ma réponse, ces photos appartenaient à la collection privée de mon grand-père et ont été prises en général soit par un membre de la famille, par son photographe militaire attitré, à des fins purement personnelles. Sauf pour les deux coupures de journaux, vielles de + de 40 ans.

Merci de m'indiquer en quoi ces photos familiales enfreignaient un quelconque copyright et m’indiquer si possible ce que je peux faire pour que vous les restauriez ? Il m'est bien évidemment impossible de demander une quelque autorisation écrite, puisque ces photos m'appartiennent.

Merci d'avance Bien cordialement PH George — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vrecourt88 (talk • contribs)

@Vrecourt88: Selon le droit français, toutes les photos ont un copyright par défaut, même si l'auteur est inconnu. Ce droit d'auteur expire habituellement 70 ans après la mort du photographe. Pour les photos publiées anonymement, ce droit expire 70 ans après la publication. En conséquence, aucune photo prise après 1943 ne peut être déposée sur Commons sans une permission expresse du photographe. Je sais que retrouver ce photographe peut être difficile, mais c'est indispensable pour les photos prises après 1943. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 15:57, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Les photos en question ont été prises entre 1952 et 1960, il y a donc environ 60 ans. Vous me demandez d'obtenir une "autorisation expresse et écrite" de quelqu'un de ma famille qui est décédé depuis plus de 30 ans ? C'est bien comme cela qu'il faut que je comprenne votre réponse ? En résumé, il est impossible de publier la moindre photo familiale sur Commons si le photographe n’est plus vivant ? Cordialement Ph GEORGE Vrecourt88
@Vrecourt88: Je suis désolé de votre problème, et je serais le premier heureux si une solution est trouvée. Voyez ce message sur le bistro pour une situation similaire : Commons:Bistro#Question des droit sur des photos relativement anciennes.. Yann (talk) 07:10, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Bonjour, j'ai été lire l'article sur le bistro. Mais la situation n'est pas identique puisque dans mon cas, c'est moi qui ai hérité des photos de mon grand-père. Etant propriétaire de ces photos, que voulez-vous que je fasse de plus ? Cordialement Ph GEORGE Vrecourt88

File:Ziemia Polska w piesni 287.jpg

Please undelete the 2nd revision of this file. The category ([5]) was there intentionally. Only the first (initial) revision should wait till 2019. Ankry (talk) 23:23, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Ankry (talk) 10:55, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Flickr licenses

I did check, and it was written: "Some rights reserved". What does it mean to you? To me, if some rights are deserved, then the image is not useful for Wikipedia.

Same user had another image deleted, in the same conditions.

Yanguas (talk) 19:57, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Yanguas: "Some rights reserved" might be OK. This is different than "All rights reserved." You have to check the license: CC-BY and CC-BY-SA are OK, but CC-BY-SA-NC or CC-BY-ND are not OK. Regards, Yann (talk) 20:01, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Афиша. Турнир Неформалов 3. Дворовые бега.jpg

Why did you delete this image? This is my own work, Sviatlana Jermakovič How should I improve it ?!!!??? I wrote a message on this pages talk. Why did't you answer smth????? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Svetit (talk • contribs)

OK, moved to a regular DR. Regards, Yann (talk) 20:33, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Bentley 4½-litre 1930

It is easy to see why you sent me the message you did on my talk page. However the only alternative is Bentley four-and-a-half-litre 1930. A Bentley 4,5-litre is a meaningless name to anyone with a knowledge of the subject. You throw away a famous (perhaps not to you) name and replace it with merely a common classification.

The act you request / endorse is not unlike a Wikipedian renaming of an article formerly Frenchman Napoleon to Frenchman Corsican - is that not where the man came from? Are there other famous Corsicans? He could still be found couldn't he. This is an encyclopaedia. Any reader just needs to think about it for a moment or two. Could any readers mind that? Well, I think a lot of them do. Very warmly, Eddaido (talk) 23:42, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Eddaido: Well, as you like. Please keep a redirect, because ½ doesn't exist on most keyboard. Regards, Yann (talk) 06:10, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you, Eddaido (talk) 22:41, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Hello, Yann. You have new messages at Cube00's talk page.
You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ English ∙ español ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ हिन्दी ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ Tagalog ∙ Türkçe ∙ 简体中文 ∙ 繁體中文 ∙ +/−

Photo of the High School "Dante Alighieri" - Rome

Hallo! I have noticed that you have just deleted the following file: File:Liceo Dante Alighieri-Roma.jpg. The image that I had loaded is taken directly from the web page of the High School "Dante Alighieri" of Rome, where I am a teacher. It is not subject to any copyright and may be used freely. In particular, it has been extracted from the following URL: http://www.liceodantealighieri.it/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/Where-we-are1.pdf . I hope that you could reconsider your decision. Greetings. Teo Orlando

@Teo Orlando: Every image has a copyright. Please send a permission. See COM:OTRS for the procedure. Regards, Yann (talk) 17:31, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
@ Yann: as a permission, is it sufficient a letter by the headmaster of the school, also attached to an email? Whom should I send this letter to?
@Teo Orlando: The permission should come from the copyright owner. That's usually the photographer, or whoever the copyright was transfered. The permission should be sent to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org Regards, Yann (talk) 18:29, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings mate! I have recently uploaded File:Universitatea de Vest din Timişoara logo.png and it got marked because of copyright violation. This is the logo of West University of Timişoara and I'm willing to use it for university's infobox. It is free to use because you can find it on other Romanian websites as a visual identification of the university. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Andreialba (talk • contribs)

@Andreialba: Well, it is not free of copyright. You need the permission from the copyright owner before uploading it here. Regards, Yann (talk) 23:39, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
@Yann: Hello mate. I've uploaded another one and provided a website of the author ( DCI ). As you can see, logo for UVT ( University ) it's free to use as you may download it by your will. There is also a manual with instructions of how you can and can not use it. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Andreialba (talk • contribs)
@Andreialba: Please do not do that. The image is a duplicate, and does not have a license again. Anyway, you may not copy images without a permission from the photographer or the designer. Regards, Yann (talk) 06:30, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User:Murilo Grillo

Hi Yann, a happy new year. I have seen that you have blocked User:Murilo Grillo for two weeks. However, after doing some research about his recent 2 uploads, for results see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Suzie Zeldin The Narrative 9 de agosto de 2011.jpg and Commons:Deletion requests/File:Banda uo.jpg, IMO we should consider a longer, if not an indef block, due to the rather malignant behaviour. What's your opinion? --Túrelio (talk) 09:42, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Túrelio: Nothing against that. Please do. Yann (talk) 09:46, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Periodic table simple fr.svg

Hi, I have added the permission and the categories. Many thanks, Nl74 (talk) 07:15, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:André Malraux, Pic, 22.jpg

On peut récupérer des images en haute résolution depuis Gallica à l'aide de ce script de ma composition qui recolle des morceaux obtenus à l'aide du zoom. Ça devrait toujours marcher si Gallica n'a pas changé son API. Pmx (talk) 13:09, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@User:JLPC et User:Jebulon : Vous connaissiez ce script ? Si non, je suis sur qu'il vous intéressera. ;o) Bonne Année à tous les deux ! Yann (talk) 14:09, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Merci ! Bonne année à toi itou ! --Jebulon (talk) 17:58, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Logo Armentières

Bonjour,

Vous avez accepté ma speedy deletion pour File:Logo Armentieres.png. Par contre, celle pour File:Logo.armentieres.png a été refusée avec ce message :

Hi. You nominated File:Logo.armentieres.png for speedy deletion. I reverted that edit. The file seems to me ineligible to copyright. You can nominate it for regular deletion request. This lasts a week. Taivo (talk) 14:37, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Comme il s'agit de 2 variantes d'un même logo, je ne sais plus quoi faire. Est-ce vraiment utile de faire une "regular deletion request" pour le deuxième fichier ou au contraire faut-il restaurer le premier ? Merci.

Habertix (talk) (et PU sur WP:FR) 02:28, 7 January 2014 (UTC).[reply]

OK, j'ai restauré ce logo. Yann (talk) 09:23, 7 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Photo "Sec Estado Berta Cabral.jpg"

Dear Yann,

This is an oficial photo of Berta Cabral, a member of the Portuguese Government. Everyone can download it at "http://www.portugal.gov.pt/pt/os-ministerios/ministerio-da-defesa-nacional/conheca-a-equipa/secretarios-de-estado/berta-cabral.aspx", using the link "Descarregar imagem". It is free and available for everyone. Thank you. Oscarazores — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.94.226.20 (talk • contribs)

All images have a copyright by default. Regards, Yann (talk) 03:05, 8 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Screenshot

Hello, Yann. Tell me please, if I will upload screenshot depicting hero of film, I break copyright? If yes, tell me please, how I can upload pictures with hero of film, without breaking copyright? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Leni18 (talk • contribs)

@Leni18: Yes, the copyright of the screenshot is owned by the film producer. You can only upload it on the English Wikipedia under fair use. Regards, Yann (talk) 08:43, 8 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Diolch yn fawr!

A BIG thank you for your work on the Book of Aneirin, which I've linked to on the Welsh Wicidestun (Wikisource) here. Now we have 3 books! Llywelyn2000 (talk) 15:23, 8 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hella Lordi.jpg

Excuse me, I do not understand anything. Why delete my pictures? What license can be if these pictures freely available? I read the rules, but they are not clear even in my language. I do not need to block, I'm not special. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jorjiana Kempl (talk • contribs)

Hello.

I speak Russian. But what can I do, if I write an article about a celebrity. I can not make her own photo. Decided to find on the Internet.

I do not even know where to write a response to the letter. T_T

Deletion

Thanks for the message Yann, will try to find a picture within approved usage limits. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Balachand (talk • contribs)

Commons:Deletion requests/File:1898 Dewar.jpg

Salut Yann. J'ai effacé le fichier, mais j'ai vu que le 30 december tu as deplacé la modèle a supprimer de fichier en citant la meme discussion. Est ce que tu peux regarder de nouveau. Merci.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:19, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Curiosité en VI

Salut Yan, j’ai un problème : en VI avec un nouvel arrivant, il ne présente pas d’image, mais il vote. Déjà je ne sais pas à quel moment on peut voter, le règlement dit « quand on est inscrit ». Mais le curieux c’est le pôle d’intérêt très ciblé de ce personnage, ça ressemble à une marionnette. Quel est ton avis ? --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 11:30, 14 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Physical_maps_of_Madhya_Pradesh_and_Gujarat

I need your feedback/information to be able to complete your request Commons:Graphic_Lab/Map_workshop#Physical_maps_of_Madhya_Pradesh_and_Gujarat. --Goran tek-en (talk) 14:25, 23 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Images

Monsieur, j'ai telechargé beaucoup des images des souverains alaouites du Maroc, mais voici le source embmarrocos.org.br/dynast.html je veu seulement ajouter les photos dans les article de ces souverains. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Moulayanass.alaoui (talk • contribs)

@Moulayanass.alaoui: Bonjour,
Vous ne pouvez pas uploader ces images sur Commons sans une permission du photographe ou du peintre. Merci de lire COM:L/fr. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 22:03, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Mais le peintre est mort, cela signifie que les articles des rois resteront sans images, ces images sont dans le roi de l'Etat marocain et non d peintre , et tous ont le droit de les utiliser car ce sont les photos officielles de sultans et rois du maroc, et vous pouvez les trouver juste sur google ou un autre moteur de recherche (image), et merci monsieur. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Moulayanass.alaoui (talk • contribs)
@Moulayanass.alaoui: Les droits d'auteur pour les peintures subsistent jusqu’à 70 ans après la mort de l'auteur. Les photos sont dans le domaine public 50 ans après la première publication. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 13:29, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Mais ces peintures sont en roi de l'Etat marocain et la famille royale et tous les marocains, car le peintre a fait ces peintures en tant que service au Hassan II, Roi Du Maroc, et ce sont maintenant les peintures officiel des Rois du Maroc. le peintre n'a fait que son travaille apres avoir un salaire financier par La Court Royale du Maroc, j'attends votre réponse et Merci.

n'oubliez pas de voir le site officiel de la Famille Royale du Maroc (Roi Mohammed V) pour bien comprendre http://www.mohammed5.ma/dynastie.asp

From Emad Kayyam

Hello Sir...

I carefully read your letter along with other letter from other Wikimedia Instructor and administrator I received before telling me that you delete my work because it has a copy right violation.

Kindly if you please check the last ten items (for example) I upload to Wikimedia Commons you will find that they are an artwork painting I entirely draw by my self and I upload by my self so they are obviously an (entirely my own work as I read in the upload page software).

I read the Wikimedia instructions and I am a person who is work hard to contribute to the wikimedia and you will not find a person like me in my country nation that has this intention to contribute and help, only have to live up to all human society all around the world and has a strong motive to work hard to develop humanitarian issue and contribute to the renaissance of science and art as mush as I can.

I work hard and all what is I am uploading are my paintings art work and my pure thoughts and new views of ideas and novel insights of my own thoughts production.

Kindly please don’t delete my work. I respect you and I hope you see how mush time I spend to work on this, I have sacrificed my time at the expense of my work and my livelihood and daily living pension in order to work this ideas, Novel insights, new views idea, my own Art work paintings, and I hope that it will benefit people in all Countries.

However I respect your view and promise Free man promise and pledge not to Upload ,and publish more Work , until you and other administrator in wikimeda & Distinguished colleagues in wikimedia commons give me a permission for that.

Thank you very much & great gratitude


Emad Kayyam

--EMAD KAYYAM (talk) 12:58, 28 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Britannic sinking.jpg

Hello Yann. How do we know this image is more than 70 years old, or otherwise complies with PD-UK? What is the source? Kablammo (talk) 17:51, 28 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Kablammo: Well, it's quite obvious, unless you are looking for very improbable reasons. This case is very well covered in the template. Yann (talk) 17:55, 28 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Yann, this is not a photograph; it is a drawing, which for all we know could have been created recently. The date listed for the image is actually the date of sinking, not the date of image creation. We need provenance here to assert that it fits within PK-UK. Regards, Kablammo (talk) 18:02, 28 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
As I said above, this case is very well covered in the template: An artistic work other than a photograph (e.g. a painting), which was made available to the public (e.g. by publication or display at an exhibition) more than 70 years ago. This is not a modern drawing, and there is all reason to believe that it was created and published shortly after this event. Do not try to look for problems where there is none. Yann (talk) 18:10, 28 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Where is the support for the belief that it was created and published shortly after this event? We have recent examples, in fact in the very history of this image (when a recent painting by Ken Marschall was substituted for this image), of recent works of art of historic events being claimed to be public domain. Personally I would like to be able to use this image, but a belief that is is old does not make it so. Kablammo (talk) 18:19, 28 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
You can believe that it was created recently, or you can look at the reasonable probabilities than it was created and published shortly after the event. Yann (talk) 18:29, 28 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Urgentes razones de Borrado Gran Oriente de Chile.png

Hola Yann. Quisiera saber porqué usted borro el archivo Gran Oriente de Chile.png. Quedo atento a sus comentarios, Saludos. Deucaleon (talk) 15:43, 29 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Foreign-policy-magazine-cover.jpeg

Dear Yann.I am going to use that file as cover page for Magazine in its own page in a low res. picture and non-free content. would you please help me about the rules.Anvar11 (talk) 08:10, 31 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Anvar11: Hello,
That's a fair use exception, which is not accepted on Commons. You have to upload this file on a local Wikipedia if it accepts fair use. The English one does. Regards, Yann (talk) 09:03, 31 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
thanks. I understand it.Anvar11 (talk) 09:19, 31 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Doré by Nadar

Deux points au sujet de ce fichier. D'abord, il me semble impossible à retoucher... à l'exception, peut-être d'une ou deux grosses poussières en forme de S (ou de méandres). Donc, OK pour le sujet et pour l'auteur, imporetants tous les deux. Mais pourquoi ne pas proposer une version alternative en sépia puisque l'original n'est pas en N & B., et puisque la pratique du virage était courante à l'époque ? (voir photo de la Commune proposée par Paris16 en FP)... Pas très important, mais à toi de voir. -- Deuxièmement : j'ai plongé dans mes livres (presque aussi vieux que moi) et trouvé deux reproductions de cette image (mais pas du même tirage). Elles sont datées de 1854. Mes références datent de trente ans, la plus sérieuse étant le n° 1 de la collection "Photo-Poche" (1982). Je pense donc que tu peux ajouter "ca 1855" à ton scope et qu'il sera ainsi recevable. Cordialement. --JLPC (talk) 14:58, 31 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@JLPC: Oui, les tirages sépia étaient courant à l'époque. Mais je pense que cette mode n'a plus de raison d'être. Les photos noir et blanc devraient être en ton de gris aujourd'hui. J'ai ajouté "ca. 1855". Cordialement, Yann (talk) 16:24, 31 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fotografia Indugel ( Barras Indugel) Articulo con igual nombre.

Yann he notado que has eliminado la imagen de las barras en el articulo si logro de alguna forma conseguir un permiso escrito por la comapania que publico la imagen, para que esta pueda ser usada de forma publica en Wikipedia Commons. Cual seria el procedimiento para regresar la imagen a su lugar original! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Judiu (talk • contribs)

Addition of U.S. Navy photo of USNS Montford Point

Yann,

I'm sorry that I have not responded to you earlier concerning the USNS Montford Point issue. I believe the photo is not under copyright because it was a government image. The original can be found at:

http://navylive.dodlive.mil/2013/03/01/navy-to-christen-its-first-mlp-usns-montford-point/

If possible, please restore the image. If not because it is copyrighted, please let me know and I will find an image that is not copyrighted.

Ross

about File:PictureofDrSalzhauer.jpg

hello,

email has been sent on permissions-en@wikimedia.org! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vishal1811 (talk • contribs)

Promo sockmaster

User:DJ Gerardo Sanchez has been using socks to upload mass self-promo images. This was his latest Confirmed sock. If you see another, let me know. INeverCry 23:59, 31 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Removed Photos

Hello Yann, I'm a medical student and I've created this page: https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ex_Manicomio_Santa_Maria_della_Pietà for an university exam, using photos from my professor and his students published in http://himetop.wikidot.com and copyrighted to him. Why have you removed these photos? Could you gently re-insert them? Thank you, Chiara. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chiara.dibello (talk • contribs)

@Chiara.dibello: : Hello,
As these images were previously published on the Internet, we need a permission. See COM:OTRS for the procedure. Regards, Yann (talk) 17:05, 2 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Banknotes from India

Hi Yann- If I'm not mistaken you once asked about images of Indian Banknotes. I am scheduled to be digitizing at the Smithsonian the last week in February. Was there anything in particular you were interested in seeing, or just an assortment of earlier (better) notes?--Godot13 (talk) 21:37, 1 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Godot13: Yes, old Indian bank notes would be nice. I am also interested by portraits of Gandhi, Tolstoy, and Ruskin. Yann (talk) 07:08, 2 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Interesting. I think I have seen a proof engraving of Gandhi by the American Banknote Company, but I need to find it. I'll see what I can do regarding banknotes or other engraved portraits for the others.-Godot13 (talk) 19:00, 3 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Image retirée

Bonjour Yann,

Une de mes photos a été retirée et j'aimerais savoir quelles sont les raisons qui sous-tendent cette décision? Tel que mentionné dans mes justifications, cette photo ne s'agit pas d'une oeuvre dérivée selon les dispositions de du droit de la propriété intellectuelle... et surtout, il s'agit d'une photo prise par moi d'une pancarte sur laquelle j'apparais moi-même. D'autres photos de pancartes électorales affichées dans la rue se retrouvent déjà sur Wikipédia et ne sont pas retirées. Commons:Deletion requests/File:Affiche électorale - Cédrick Beauregard.jpeg

Merci beaucoup de bien vouloir m'éclairer à ce sujet. Cordialement, --cyb (talk) 20:11, 2 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@cyb: Si, la photo est bien une oeuvre dérivée de l'affiche. Voir Commons:FOP#Canada. Pour les autres photos mentionnées, l'affiche ne comprend qu'un logo, qui peut-être considéré comme de minimis. Si vous connaissez le créateur de l'affiche, vous pouvez envoyer une permission, et la photo sera restaurée. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 20:25, 2 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Noaptea Muzeelor (Romania)

Hello Yann, I'm a volunteer and I've created this page: ro.wikipedia.org/wiki/Noaptea_Muzeelor ‎ for the teem Museums at Night from Romania. For this page I've created the photo Logo eveniment Noaptea Muzeelor - România, ediţia 2014, File:Header_NoapteaMuzeelorRomania_2014.jpg using photo from Angela Iacob (coordinator Bucharest) representing logo edition 2014. Why have you removed these photo? Could you gently re-insert them? Thank you, PheonixRo. — Preceding unsigned comment added by PheonixRo (talk • contribs)

@PheonixRo: Because you forgot to add a license, and this seems to be a poster. I think it would be best if you send a permission for this file. See COM:OTRS for the procedure. Meanwhile, I restored it and created a proper DR. Regards, Yann (talk) 05:41, 5 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Dinman Arya.jpg

Hi, Yann. I have been thought about people, who use Wikipedia only for self-promotion and uploading personal files without other useful contribution. I have nominated their all uploads for deletion and generally they get all deleted. But this request you closed as kept. Formally, yes, you are right, the file is used. But the user has not made any useful edits in Wikipedia. As much as I know, Commons has no policy about persons who make nothing in Wikipedia except userpage and uploading selfies for them. What do you think about that? Maybe you want to alter you decision? Taivo (talk) 13:35, 5 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Taivo: Yes, I understand your point of view. As you said, we don't have a policy against people uploading a few pictures of them. In fact, this is explicitly allowed. It would be better if people contribute, but deleting this image won't help about that. May be he will contrbute in the future. AGF. On this very same day, I deleted 10 images uploaded for self-promotion. My opinion is one image is OK, 10 are too many. So let it be. Yann (talk) 14:22, 5 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleting ryanleafdraft.png

Hello,

I'm just curious as to why the photo that I uploaded, File:Ryanleafdraft.png, was deleted. It says that there was some copyright problems, but as far as I know, the copyrights checked out since the photo was freely published on the internet, and the owner not only did not give proper info in the source, but also did not explicitly say that it was copyrighted. However, my investigation skills are not ideal, so I would like some input. Please reply to me message on my talk page on the English wiki, which can be found here.

Thank you for your time and I hope to hear back from you. Aerospeed (talk) 01:07, 7 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Aerospeed: There is nothing freely published on the internet. All documents have a copyright by default. You need the permission from the photographer before uploading anything here. Regards, Yann (talk) 08:24, 7 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Dreiländerbrücke.jpg

Hello Yann,

I have made a DR on an image which is made in France. We have here a special case because the bridge, which is the main object of the image, is situated on the german-french border. But from my comprehension this bridge (build 2006-2007) is protected by copyright of the architect. Images from Germany are coverd by the Freedom of Panorama, so no problem. Images from France are not, so they have to be deleted. Please look carefully at this case. Thanks, best regards --Wladyslaw (talk) 07:28, 7 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Wladyslaw: Well, I personally think that our interpretation of the no-FOP restriction on pictures of architecture and buildings is completely exaggerated, so I won't comment on this matter. I know that most other admins think differently. Regards, Yann (talk) 08:31, 7 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Can you argue why? --Wladyslaw (talk) 10:33, 7 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Either because the copyright is quite dubious or nobody really care. This is the typical arbitrary rule put against ordinary people: a completely inapplicable rule is created. Almost nobody care, but time to time, somebody brings this rule out of the box. Commons should not follow this kind of rules. Regards, Yann (talk) 16:59, 7 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion requests for image uploads at Wikimedia - User:Mansoor Ijaz

REPLY TO: Copyright violations

Hello Mansoor Ijaz,

You have uploaded several files that are copyright violations and you have done so despite our requests not to do so, and despite our instructions. If you do not stop uploading files that are not free, your account will be blocked. See Commons:Licensing for the copyright policy on Wikimedia Commons. You may also find Commons:Image casebook useful. Please leave me a message if you have further questions.

Yann (talk) 15:05, 7 February 2014 (UTC)

Hello User Yann
Your admonition is misplaced. I have not knowingly or willingly violated any copyright rules of Wikimedia Commons or any other entity associated therein. In fact, I have done my utmost to correctly and credibly source each entry that was not from my personal archives. I have only added those images that I thought would improve the texture and understanding of written words in the articles I edit. Those images that were from my personal archives for which you added Deletion Requests on my Talk page have been directly justified with clear evidentiary statements in my responses to you on your Talk page.
Would it not serve the Wiki community better for you to offer help BEFORE you make judgment, then to mark-up, delete and then after the fact offer your help?
As a result of your wholesale deletion of everything I tried to do to improve the articles I have edited, I have decided not to use Wikimedia to upload anything until I have resolved my dispute with you directly with the editorial community. Wikipedia and Wikimedia Commons are supposed to be a collegiate exercise in helping each other, not mocking and not treating us as if everything we have done is wrong. I strongly object to what you did today - if this is what Wiki is all about, I no longer wish to participate in this project.
Mansoor Ijaz (talk) 18:50, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
One more point -- I asked for help on January 26th. TWICE!!! No one helped and no one gave any proper advice about how to do any of this. You of course had access to the same HELP request as anyone else visiting my Talk page to see that I was having some difficulty understanding the rules and wanted clarification. You certainly did not help me then, nor before you took your hostile actions today without even trying to understand my rationale in how I chose the licensing of each upload. I again ask, what agenda do you have against me, and from what source does your bias arise?
Mansoor Ijaz (talk) 18:58, 7 February 2014 (UTC)


Dear Yann, I have responded now to each of the deletion requests you made. The obvious violations that were deleted (Jones Chamber of Commerce or Jones Atlantic Council), which I did not understand were such because when I uploaded, I made clear that I did not know what the licensing was and that I found these images on the internet, which images I thought enhanced the articles I was editing.

Your subsequent deletion requests of materials that are genuinely my own (my weightlifting photos or my All-American certificate, etc) show bias and malice in the wholesale manner in which your deletion requests were made. If there is something I have genuinely done to violate Wikimedia rules, I will voluntarily delete or ask something to be deleted. I am even happy to just stop contributing in positive ways to Wikimedia and Wikipedia altogether if I am deemed to be violating the rules so unceremoniously. But this is not at all what I have done. I have made contributions from my private archives that are my own to give and license for the benefit of the public at large because most of the uploaded contributions have historical value and give important context to the articles I am editing.

Your cavalier assertions simply ignore all that, as if you know better than I do what is mine to give, and what is under my authority to license to the public domain. I am perhaps not as seasoned an editor as you are, but rather than taking the stance you did, you could have also placed a note on my talk page to ask me why I licensed something the way I did, and if I was wrong because I do not understand something, either we jointly agree to delete it or I re-upload with proper licensing. I am willing to learn. I am not prepared to let someone's agenda against my person be played out in public.

Sincerely Yours,


REPLY TO: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Memorandum & Judicial Commission Report.png

Not own work, no source, bogus license. Yann (talk) 14:59, 7 February 2014 (UTC)

It is publicly documented that I transmitted the Memorandum from Pakistan's ambassador to the United States at that time to Admiral Mullen through Gen. James L. Jones. The memorandum image uploaded is from my own files. The Memorandum was typed on my computer from instructions given to me by the ambassador.

Mansoor Ijaz (talk) 15:31, 7 February 2014 (UTC)

REPLY TO: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Bill Clinton & Mansoor Ijaz at the White House, 1997.jpg

Not own work, no source, bogus license. Yann (talk) 14:59, 7 February 2014 (UTC)

This image was given to me as a gift from the president at the time it was taken. It is my personal property and I believe I have the right to license this as my own work. It also exists in the public domain.

Mansoor Ijaz (talk) 15:25, 7 February 2014 (UTC)

REPLY TO: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Lt. Gen. Ahmad Shuja Pasha (ret'd).jpg

No publication date to prove this license is valid. Yann (talk) 15:00, 7 February 2014 (UTC)

Am I allowed to determine from the Pakistan Armed Forces the publication date and resubmit?

Mansoor Ijaz (talk) 15:07, 7 February 2014 (UTC)

REPLY TO: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Supreme Court of Pakistan IJAZ WITNESS STATEMENT.pdf

Not own work, no source, bogus license. Yann (talk) 15:01, 7 February 2014 (UTC)

I am the source of the Witness Statement. It is MY WITNESS STATEMENT and I created the document. Please read and see for yourself.

Mansoor Ijaz (talk) 15:32, 7 February 2014 (UTC)

REPLY TO: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Gen Abe & Reagan (SDI).png

Not own work, no source, bogus license. Yann (talk) 15:01, 7 February 2014 (UTC)

This photograph was personally given to me by Gen. Jim Abrahamson in 1997. I own the photo as part of my personal private property. I scanned a copy in and placed it in the Abrahamson article to give it context in pictorial form. The original photograph signed by President Reagan to Gen. Abrahamson was given to Abe by the president. I believe I have the right to license this as my own work since it exists in my private archives.

Mansoor Ijaz (talk) 15:07, 7 February 2014 (UTC)

REPLY TO: Commons:Deletion requests/File:2000.08.17 KASHMIR Sayed Salahuddin Letter to Clinton on Peace Offer.jpg

Not own work, no source, bogus license. Yann (talk) 15:02, 7 February 2014 (UTC)

This image was also created by me personally from the copy of the original letter which I hand carried from Syed Salahuddin to President Clinton. This document exists in my personal archives and the image was generated by me to emphasize existence of the peace offer made by a Kashmiri leader that requested the American president's personal support. This letter proves important assertions in the Kashmir section of article "Mansoor Ijaz". I scanned a copy of the letter into a JPEG image and placed it in the article to give a controversial subject matter verifiable context in image form. The original letter exists in the archives of the United States government. I believe I have the right to license this as my own work since I personally delivered the letter and it exists in my private archives and is also in the public domain.

Mansoor Ijaz (talk) 15:25, 7 February 2014 (UTC)

REPLY TO: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Bashir letter to Hamilton.jpg

Not own work, no source, bogus license. Yann (talk) 15:02, 7 February 2014 (UTC)

This image was created by me personally from the copy of the letter which I hand carried from President Bashir to Congressman Hamilton. This document exists in my personal archives and the image was generated by me to emphasize important language that supports assertions in the article "Mansoor Ijaz". I scanned a copy of the letter into a JPEG image and placed it in the article to give a controversial subject matter verifiable context in pictorial form. The original letter exists in the archives of the United States government. I believe I have the right to license this as my own work since I personally delivered the letter and it exists in my private archives.

Mansoor Ijaz (talk) 15:19, 7 February 2014 (UTC)

REPLY TO: Commons:Deletion requests/File:1982 All-American Powerlifting Certificate.jpg

Not own work, no source, bogus license. Yann (talk) 15:03, 7 February 2014 (UTC)

Note to User Yann: this is indeed my own work because I earned the All-American status, and I own the certificate, and I scanned the certificate in from the original copy in my possession. Under those rules that I read and understood from Wikimedia, this is indeed properly licensed and my work. The cavalier manner in which you have questioned every single one of my uploads indicates bias and prejudicial motivation. Why?

Mansoor Ijaz (talk) 15:07, 7 February 2014 (UTC)


Thank you for your response.

Is there a way to correct the ones that may be problematic then? Meaning, can they be corrected after the fact? Certainly, of the ones above, the Bashir letter, the Kashmir letter, the Clinton photo (White House), the GenAbe and Reagan photo qualify as US Government public materials. The weightlifting is my personal material from my personal archive. I don't see any way in which you can question that.

Mansoor Ijaz (talk) 15:56, 7 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Help Request with Redundant Image Upload

Hi Yann,

Can you help me figure out how to re-upload this particular image? It was originally uploaded by another user that I had asked to do so when I was not aware of how to upload images. The Wikimedia Upload Wizard now makes that process so much easier. I do not know how to delete that image, and still wish to use the image in my Wikipedia Article.

I thought I uploaded it correctly this afternoon but it still shows when I log in to my account as some sort of problem.

https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Upload&wpUploadDescription={{subst%3AUpload%20marker%20added%20by%20en.wp%20UW}}%0A{{Information%0A%7CDescription%20%3D%20

English: Mansoor%20IJAZ%20Lotus%20F1%20Grid%20Monaco%20GP%202013

%0A|Source%20%3D%20PDA%20Photo%3Cbr%2F%3E%0A%27%27%27Previously%20published%3A%27%27%27%20None%0A|Date%20%3D%2025%20May%202013%0A|Author%20%3D%20CzechBot%0A}}%0A%0A%3BOther%20information%3A%0A

English: No

%0A&wpLicense=self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-3.0|migration%3Dredundant&wpDestFile=M%20IJAZ%20Lotus%20F1%20Grid%20MC.

Thanks for your assistance.

Mansoor Ijaz (talk) 19:08, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

DELETION OF File:Sandha Nodutu Tharaka.jpg AND OTHER IMAGE

on what based you taken steps to delete those my own images? these images are taken by me. uploaded on other websites by me. did you spend at least a minute to read them? please take necessary steps to undelete them.

as i have explained to you, these images are taken by me. please restore them. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Eeriyaka (talk • contribs)

@Eeriyaka: This is a poster. You need a permission from the copyright owner. Regards, Yann (talk) 05:44, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

French/German bridge copyrighted?

Hi Yann, could you give an opinion about whether the bridge, subject of this DR Commons:Deletion requests/File:Dreiländerbrücke.jpg, would likely be copyrighted or not in France, as the image has been shot from the French side. --Túrelio (talk) 08:45, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Owlle image

Bonjour,

J'ai reçu votre message mais je ne comprends pas car les photos que j'avais au départ téléchargé étaient en effet pas valides. Je ne le savais pas je débutais.

Entre temps j'ai utilisé commons via flikr d'ailleurs et j'ai troué une photo toutà fait utilisable par wikipédia. ma page a été restauré et tout va bien. Je ne comprends pas pourquoi je reçois ce message alors que les photos qui avaient été mauvaises n'ont jamais été utilisées au final... Ces photos je ne les utiliserai jamais. Je n'utilise que la photo valable et qui figure sur la page que j'ai crée. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yoliney (talk • contribs)

@Yoliney: Bonjour,
File:Owlle Portrait.jpg semble venir de myspace.com et n'a pas de licence.
File:Owlle France.jpg est la couverture d'un album, et il faut donc une autorisation du producteur.
File:Owlle.jpg semble venir de playingtheangel.com et n'a pas de licence.
Cordialement, Yann (talk) 15:30, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Images uploaded by Rcamacho

Dear Yann,

File:LOGO-World-Art-Day.jpg can be used "free" a per http://iaaworldartday.com/download/ File:Arias Murueta y otros artistas.JPG can be used "free" because it is a photo that I took from a public newspaper which date is 1968. File:El mural colectivo, 1968.JPG can be used "free" because it is a photo that I took form a public newspaper which date is 1968. File:Gustavo Arias Murueta.jpg I am an Art Curator, and I personally took this photo to Master Gustavo Arias Murueta; by the way I am the Agent of Master Arias. File:Manglar Tampamachoco.JPG As I mentioned, I am an Art Curator and I took this photo the very same moment of the exhibit day form that painting of Master Jorge Carral, which I also represent as his Agent. File:Luz tras el cristal.jpeg Same as Master Arias Murueta and Master Jorge Carral, this photo that I took is from a painting of Master Magda Torres Gurza, which I am her Agent.

So please do not modify the status of these images.

Thank you so much --Rcamachoo (talk) 15:17, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Rcamachoo: Hello,
All images which were published elsewhere before (newspapers, web sites, etc.) need a permission. Regards, Yann (talk) 15:32, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I'll have a letter from the World Art Day. The newspapers DO NOT exists any more and as I mentioned are from 1968! As far as I noticed you already deleted many photos, including those of my own, that is, I took them and I authorize any one to use them freely. So, could you please reactivate File:Gustavo Arias Murueta.jpg, File:Manglar Tampamachoco.JPG and File:Luz tras el cristal.jpeg. And could you tell me what to do about those newspapers? Thank you, --Rcamachoo (talk) 17:56, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
@Rcamachoo: Please send a copy of your letter to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org. See COM:OTRS for the details of the procedure. For the newspapers, depending of which country they were published, the copyright can last from 30 years after publication upto 70 after the death of the photographer. Regards, Yann (talk) 19:22, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Avan Jogia photo

Hello I received your message in my email. Maybe you can help me out, I find Wikipedia so confusing. :) I'm trying to upload a photo of Avan Jogia that reflects him at 22 (the last photo is from him when he 17 ) and all the copyright rules are baffling me. I am employed by him and have many of our own photos. But this is a Wikipedia for his work. so I thought a red carpet JPEG is what I thought would reflect this best. Any suggestions would be helpful Thanks so much in advance Yann — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.84.179.38 (talk • contribs)

Hello,
You picture needs a permission. See COM:OTRS for the procedure. Yann (talk) 05:12, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yann,

I'm sorry that I have not responded to you earlier concerning the File:Tubby logo.jpg. I believe the photo is not under copyright because it was low resolution small logo under free license . The original can be found at: http://www.flickr.com/photos/117119805@N07/12443740853/

If possible, please restore the image. If not because it is copyrighted, please let me know and I will find an image that is not copyrighted.

Muhammad Ahmad Ayoub

This seems not to be uploaded on Flickr by the company, and therefore that license might not be valid. I also think that it is probably out of scope. Please request undeletion at COM:UDR. Regards, Yann (talk) 13:46, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
yann,The owner of the company who uploaded it (Anthony Keeling). You can look at this website for confirmation http://www.tubby.co.nz/page/meet-team-tubby/ Regards. Muhammad Ayoub
OK, fine. I restored it. Regards, Yann (talk) 15:02, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Stations of the Cross

Hello Yann, I notice that you have uploaded very fine pictures of many of the Stations of the Cross at Notre-Dame, Geneva. One of the ones which is missing, and in which I would have a particular interest, is Station 6 (the "Veronica" station). Do you by any chance have an image of it – and if so, would you consider uploading it? I should be most grateful. Of course, if you do not have it, I apologise for troubling you. Vilcxjo (talk) 18:34, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Vilcxjo: Hello,
Thanks for your message. I probably have it on another hard drive which is not with me at this time. It never finished this, and it still bothers me... Sorry. Yann (talk) 19:01, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Para agradecer y comentarle

Hola, Yann partiendo de su acertado y muy válido comentario, así como las sugerencias sobre mi archivo: Sistema de regadío circular; , y por la importancia e interés que considero pueda tener esta maquinaria para la agricultura, (además de su impacto visual por su forma y tamaño), donde pudiera ayudar apoyando algún proyecto de la comunidad, he decidido subir una nueva foto del mismo, pero donde puede verse el equipo en toda su magnitud con otra perspectiva, , e igualmente la he nominado a candidata a FP. Le hago saber esto pues agradecería y apreciaría mucho si usted pudiera pasar y dar su nueva valoración y opinión sobre esta foto actual. Muchas gracias. Un saludo cordial Ivan2010

Agradeciendole

Muchas gracias por su voto a favor y su comentario sobre mi archivo. Sistema de regadío circular en toda su magnitud. , Un saludo cordial. Ivan2010

File:Hon.Minister Weerakumara Dissanayaka.jpg

whats wrong with you? this image taken from my camera. please undelete it. this image was in wikimedia more than 2-4 years as i remember? are you bored? nothing to do? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Eeriyaka (talk • contribs)

Red Army Star; deletion request

Yes, please delete the two media files that I uploaded; I as was not able to confirm the proper copy right on the two images.

--Factor01 (talk) 21:34, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done Yann (talk) 21:51, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Zdjęcia

Nie było moim celem naruszenie praw autorskich. Dostałem komunikat, że jeżeli nie znam źródła pliku, to mam podać adres strony, z której pochodzi plik. Zamierzałem przesyłać kolejne pliki, ale teraz już jestem zdezorientowany. Nie wiem w takim razie, jakie źródło jest dobre. Przepraszam, że piszę po polsku, ale nie znam biegle angielskiego :) Adek 4028 (talk)

@Adek 4028: Hello,
For all images where you are not the photographer or which were published elsewhere before being uploaded to Commons, you need a permission. Regards, Yann (talk) 09:33, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Undeletion

Hi,

There is a proper agreement for two recently deleted files sent to OTRS [6]:

Could you undelete it?

Cheers,

Polimerek (talk) 18:47, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Polimerek: ✓ Done Please add a source and a license. Regards, Yann (talk) 18:59, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

typo: Katyn media file wrong date

Hello, please change the description date of the File:Katyn1943.ogv; a typo has the date of 1973, it should be 1943, also the file name should say .gov on .ogv. --Factor01 (talk) 01:24, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Factor01: Actually, the date might be right: it says "Central Intelligence Agency (09/18/1947 - 12/04/1981)". OGV is the file format. You can't change it. And you can edit the description yourself. Regards, Yann (talk) 08:52, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Copyrights violation

FYI: All of these files have copyrights violation. --AntonTalk 07:53, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Archivos eliminados

Hola Yann los siguientes archivos que me han borrado, son de uso libre ya que fueron tomados de páginas de uso público, además de todas formas los mismos indican la página web de donde se tomaron para poder hacer mención a los autores de las fotografías. Agradezco tomar en cuenta lo anterior y con esto permitirme publicar las imágenes ya que son sin fines de lucro.

File:AlejandroMoreraSoto.jpg File:Costa-rica-national-stadium-1.jpg File:Renovacion-EstadioRicardoSaprissa.jpg File:Edgardobaltodano.jpg

Gracias. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jovargas17 (talk • contribs)

@Jovargas17: Hello,
Sorry, I don't speak Spanish. You may get some help on Commons:Café. Regards, Yann (talk) 18:54, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong removing

This files FOR PUBLIC USE:

I know what dowloading. This companies make agriment to use this logos. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ‎SlavaBest (talk • contribs)

@‎SlavaBest: Hello,
These files need a permission. Please see COM:OTRS for the procedure. Regards, Yann (talk) 18:52, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The Hotchkiss picture is the correct class, date is 1923. It is a scan from yearbook in public domain. I put as owner as I did not see any option for out of copyright public domain work. Feel free to change accordingly, but class year is correct.

File:Yoshiki OfficialPhoto GGTheme.jpg

Hi Yann, I just wanted to ask you about this. I'm still the baby admin here and most of my uses of the tools are either uncontroversial copyvios or OTRS-related so I'm very happy to take advice from more experienced admins, but your suggestion of creating a DR and immediately closing it is not something I've heard of before. Is that normal practice? And do you not feel that the permanent link to the OTRS/N thread in the deletion log is sufficient context? Thanks, HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 13:14, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@HJ Mitchell: Hello,
Sorry for not answering before. I don't think there is a policy about special cases like this one, but I know that creating a DR and closing it immediately has been done by several admins. I do it regularly. It's just a matter of keeping a record of special cases. Best regards, Yann (talk) 18:58, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Fair enough; thanks. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 22:16, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Surjendranil

Since when has obvious sockpuppet crap not been speedy deletable? See the tracking category on en-wp and my deletion nomination history here in Commons. File:Tabumonerekho2.jpg and its other versions have been uploaded here by vandal countless times. Somebody should start blocking the many Surjendranal socks in Commons. Jni (talk) 07:34, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It was used. Now that it is not, we can delete it. Yann (talk) 07:42, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! This guy persistently creates and tries to hide versions of same autobio to obscure locations in multiple wikis so his images here are in use before pages get deleted, which might take some time as deletion processes are different in different parts of wiki-universe and no global sysop is checking this regularly. Jni (talk) 11:16, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Apostolos Serletis Photo deletion

Why did you delete this image? it is my photo that I took of my supervisor. I have the copyright. Perrygogas (talk) 11:21, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Perrygogas: Hello,
According to the EXIF data, the copyright owner of this picture is an agency (David H. Brown, UCalgary LCR Photo Services). Since you are not the photographer, you need to send a permission. See COM:OTRS for the procedure. Regards, Yann (talk) 13:32, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour Yann, Étant donné que vous m'aviez proposer de m'aider sur Wikimedia Commons il y a quelques temps, je me permet de vous demander de l'aide afin d'importer un logo, je sais que l'on ne peut pas l'importer directement sur wikimedia à cause du copyright mais je ne sais pas comment cela se passe...

Merci !

Amicalement, Vanoot59 (talk) 11:35, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Vanoot59: Bonjour,
Si le logo ne peut être importé sur Commons, il faut l'importer sur Wikipedia : fr:Aide:Importer un fichier. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 13:27, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Merci beaucoup ! Vanoot59 (talk) 15:06, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of Jose_Amparado_Rosabal.jpg

10:59, 17 February 2014 (UTC) Hi Yann,

The photo File:Jose_Amparado_Rosabal.jpg belongs to the family, however, it was taken by someone some years ago who can no longer be located (I would very much like to continue using it in the article). Also we have several pictures that are of my great-grandfather, some going as far back as the 1930's... what would be the best license to place these photos under?

Thank you for your time in advance. Sincerely, GoldCertificate

@GoldCertificate: Hello,
Family pictures are a bit of a problem here. Commons is very strict, and requires a permission from the photographer, or that there are in the public domain. Even pictures from the 1930's are not readily accepted. If the photographer is not known, it then depends if they were published, and where. Sorry. Regards, Yann (talk) 07:48, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Yann,

The particular picture that has been deleted was placed on the internet already; we gave permission for an obituary website to display it. So in regards to File:Jose_Amparado_Rosabal.jpg, how can I have it reverted back to wiki without a problem?

In regards to the photos from 1930's, I suppose the best bet would be to place them as photos for the public domain? I really would much rather have them placed as family property (we are very certain they have not been published by anyone).

Thank you again for the assistance.

Regards, GoldCertificate, 09:41, 18 February 2014 (UTC)

@GoldCertificate: Hello,
Try to send a permission fo OTRS. They may be able to give you a better advice. See COM:OTRS for the procedure. Regards, Yann (talk) 14:46, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tajkeratul_Maizbhanderia_Maizbhanderi_Academy_1st_Issue_2008.jpg

Yann, there is a message for you at File:Tajkeratul_Maizbhanderia_Maizbhanderi_Academy_1st_Issue_2008.jpg. --Jarekt (talk) 13:08, 19 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not being a sysop any more, which rights should I ask for?

Hello Yann, can I ask for your advice? Here are some figures:

Source

User "Zyephyrus" has 539 images.
Site Images used
fr.wikisource 13552
en.wikisource 1069
la.wikisource 136
es.wikisource 74
fr.wikipedia 34
it.wikisource 16
en.wikipedia 12
de.wikipedia 10
sources.wikipedia 9
ru.wikipedia 8
es.wikipedia 8
it.wikipedia 6
uk.wikisource 5
el.wikisource 5
eo.wikisource 5
ja.wikipedia 5
ca.wikisource 4
te.wikisource 4
ml.wikisource 3
he.wikipedia 3
pt.wikipedia 3
vi.wikipedia 3
pl.wikipedia 3
fa.wikisource 2
sv.wikipedia 2
bg.wikiquote 2
uk.wikipedia 2
mk.wikisource 2
bn.wikisource 2
outreach.wikipedia 2
sh.wikipedia 2
no.wikipedia 2
ru.wikiquote 2
mzn.wikipedia 2
id.wikisource 2
ro.wikipedia 1
ru.wikisource 1
uk.wikiquote 1
bg.wikipedia 1
pt.wikisource 1
is.wikisource 1
kk.wikipedia 1
tr.wikipedia 1
ast.wikipedia 1
gl.wikipedia 1
pl.wikiquote 1
nn.wikipedia 1
fi.wikipedia 1
la.wikipedia 1
incubator.wikipedia 1
pcd.wikipedia 1e right
id.wikipedia 1
sk.wikipedia 1
hu.wikipedia 1
en.wikiquote 1
da.wikipedia 1
ca.wikipedia 1
cs.wikipedia 1
nl.wikipedia 1
Total image usages 15025
Distinct images used 508 (94.25% of all images of user)

My 539 images have met 15,025 usages; 94.25% of my work has proved to be useful; I may have been right when not stopping nor deleting vandalisms no vandalism having happened in the files I watch; but when vandalisms do occur, I need tools at hand: which ones? Sysop's tools? and if not, which tools do you think I should require? Thanks for your advice if you have some. --Zyephyrus (talk) 15:58, 19 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker)If you are looking for tool can revert vandal in one-click, you are looking for COM:Rollbacker, and admins have it in default. —레비Revi 16:02, 19 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! --Zyephyrus (talk) 16:43, 19 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright Tags on My Images.

Good morning. I have received a plethora of Copyright claims, sent by you, on works that Me, Myself and I have created and uploaded onto Wikimedia Commons for use on Wikipedia. I would kindly like to ask why this is? Why do I need to provide permission information for something that I created and uploaded? Am I really that famous that I need to prove it's me? I'm pretty sure a lot of people have never heard of me or my works! :P Also, that February 19 expiration date is pretty harsh! It's 3am in the morning on February 20 here, and I'm starting to think this is both a conspiracy to kick me of Wikimedia and a conspiracy to keep me awake with 11+ email notifications! RazorEyeEdits (talk) 16:39, 19 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:18e trou GV.jpg

Dear Yann,

could you explain to me what do i need to do in order to have the image accepted. If i had the name of the person qho took, will it be ok?

Thank You — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fred bel (talk • contribs)

@Fred bel: Hello,
The photographer needs to send a permission. Please see COM:OTRS for the procedure. Regards, Yann (talk) 17:15, 19 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion_requests/File:SUDHA_SONI.JPG

Hi, Yann. At first I kept the file speedily and categorized it, then you deleted it speedily. I am not sure, who is correct. Probably is now the best to wait until end of regular request, one week? What do you think? Taivo (talk) 18:38, 19 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Taivo: I think there is a serious privacy issue with this image, and it is not used, so if the uploader want it deleted, I don't see any reason to refuse that. Regards, Yann (talk) 18:43, 19 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I do not see privacy issues with version I kept. Let's imagine, that she will become a famous scientist or politician and some newspaper finds the photo and publishes it: when she was younger, then she looked like that. And so? But encyclopedic value was weak, nothing irreplaceable here, valuable only as stock photo, so ... this was not big loss for Commons. For me, case closed. Taivo (talk) 19:01, 19 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Concerning an image

Hello I have an important question. How do people upload game covers to the wiki pages without getting them removed? Also, the image File:Bokujou-monogatari-tsunagaru-shin-tenchi.jpg was deleted, how do I know when I can use such images? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Judgementwolf (talk • contribs)

@Judgementwolf: Hello,
Game covers are only accepted on the English Wikipedia under fair use. Regards, Yann (talk) 16:58, 19 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
@Yann Hi again, so can I use the image here or some where else? I'm a new editor and I would not like to make the same mistake twice and please provide a link. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Judgementwolf (talk • contribs)
@Judgementwolf: See en:Wikipedia:Non-free content. Regards, Yann (talk) 06:59, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
@Yann so by Wikipedia's non free policy I'm allowed to use the image in question under the rules that no substitute cannot be used.
This rule(No free equivalent. Non-free content is used only where no free equivalent is available, or could be created, that would serve the same encyclopedic purpose) and Template:Non-free video game cover—for video game covers.) so can I re-upload the image using these rules and guidelines?
@Judgementwolf: Hello, You have to do it here: en:Wikipedia:File Upload Wizard. Regards, Yann (talk) 08:19, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Nana Ntumba

Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Nana Ntumba

Hello! I’m not sure you noted that two hours after your closing of Commons:Undeletion requests/Current requests#Commons:Deletion requests.2FFiles uploaded by Nana Ntumba a new DR was filed on the same images, with the same rationale. -- Tuválkin ✉ 16:41, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Some admins have a weird understanding of Commons policies. :( Yann (talk) 16:59, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I didn't reopen the DR, but I might have. Tuvalkin did not bother to tell me that he was posting an UnDR and misrepresented my comments in the UnDR. I think your undeletion was premature. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:17, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Apologies to Jameslwoodward for not having explitedly linked to the undeletion request; I assumed that the ping from {{U}} would be enough. However I’m sure I didn’t misrepresented his role in the original deletion — as I even linked to his own characterisation of it: Indeed, he didn’t ignore the keep-vote argumentation (not this time), he simply didn’t notice it. -- Tuválkin ✉ 21:24, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
For reasons I don't understand, your reference to the specific discussion on my talk page did not create a ping -- I think for a ping to happen you must refer to a user, not link a talk page.
It is true that I didn't notice your comments when I closed the DR. However, your misrepresentation comes with failing to mention that at your instigation I went back to the DR and considered each of your comments in detail, including making comments.
Your comments in the 1st DR — interspersed among mine with no distinguishing formatting and no signature or date (just like the one above by the way; something wrong with your tilde key?) — were added after the DR was closed by you. (Also an unorthodox thing, to add stuff to the blue area.) In the undeletion request I stated that when you closed the DR you were not aware of my expanded keep-vote rationales, because I created a subheader, something I learned from you. Your subsequent comments simply confirm your opinion, but the process allowed more views to be given to the matter and the fate of these images doesn’t depend on any legality about the closing of the 1st DR. I will in turn consider each of your replies in detail and comment them in the current DR. (And applogies to Yann to be squatting like this in his talk page.) -- Tuválkin ✉ 07:33, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Jim, I maintain that deleting these was a bad idea, and Fastily reopening the DR is doubly wrong. Regards, Yann (talk) 04:22, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Bullshit. Your closure of the UD request is a blatant violation of COM:SCOPE. I recommend familiarizing yourself with that policy before humiliating yourself in public like you currently are. Cheers, FASTILY 09:11, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Fastily, first stay polite. You may have different opinions, but you are quite wrong here. No need to display bad words, it won't change that fact. Yann (talk) 09:15, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Besoin d'aide

Salut Yann, Merci pour le pére Espinasse que tu as fait promouvoir en FP. J'ai un problème avec cette image file:Paracentrotus lividus MHNT France.jpg‎ Le nom de départ été erroné, j'ai fais les différente modification. Mais reste la promotion en VI qu'il faudrait annuler. Peux-tu le faire ou me dire comment le faire. Merci...--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:15, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour,
Enlève simplement le modèle. Tu pourrais la renominer avec un nouveau scope. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 10:48, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Bibliothèque humaniste de Sélestat

Bonjour Claude,

Je viens de découvrir tes superbes photos de cette bibliothèque. Je pense que tu pourrais en soumettre plusieurs comme images remarquables. Mon quota est déjà rempli, je ne peux donc pas les proposer moi-même. J'aime particulièrement File:Bibliothèque humaniste de Sélestat 21 janvier 2014-97.jpg. J'ai vu aussi qu'il y a un projet de photographier les "ouvrages les plus importants qui y sont conservés". Y a-t-il une liste ? Cordialement, Yann (talk) 18:53, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Bonsoir Yann,
Merci mais je ne suis pas fana de ces labels, vu la manière dont certaines mafias se sont emparées de la chose.
J’ai d‘ailleurs décidé de mettre un vignettage sur toute la série parce que trouve que ça les améliore et surtout parce que lesdites mafias ont horreur de ça ! Clin
Je ne ferais donc pas la démarche, mais libre à quiconque de le faire.
Il n’y a pas de liste établie pur le moment concernant les ouvrages à photographier, mais ce seront en priorité les manuscrits et incunables.
Je te signale par ailleurs une série sur la Bibliothèque du Grand séminaire de Strasbourg.
Merci pour ta proposition, cordialement, --Claude Truong-Ngoc (talk) 19:06, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Merci Yann et bon dimanche. Très cordialement, --Claude Truong-Ngoc (talk) 09:55, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Igor_Birman_for_Congress_photo.jpg photo wrongful removing

Yann,

This photo (File:Igor Birman for Congress photo.jpg) comes from a United States congressional campaign and is considered public domain. I am in contact with the campaign itself to verify that it is available for public sharing, and I have explicit approval that the photo is duly qualified to be included into the Wikimedia Commons. Please undo this removal as soon as possible.

Respectfully, Hubbardc

@Hubbardc: Hello,
This picture was copied from Facebook, so we need a permission. Please see COM:OTRS for the procedure. Regards, Yann (talk) 21:50, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Consultation on deletion of a picture "File:Jorge-Felipe de Sajonia-Gessaphe.jpg"

Dear Yann, you are right in delete the other photo (named: "File:Hereditary+Prince+Hubertus+Saxe+Coburg+Gotha+qqvx0r42zIhl.jpg"), although it is freely available on internet, she has a copyright by his author. I really misunderstood the Wikimedia Commons rules about that.

In the other photo that I upload (named: "File:Jorge-Felipe de Sajonia-Gessaphe.jpg") although all the pics of the website whence comes the aforementioned are copyrighted, the photo in question was edited by me and is not the same to the one that is shown in the original website. Does this fact have any impact in the deletion made by you? or do not have the lowest importance...

Thanks for ur time and patience with my poor english! — Preceding unsigned comment added by GaboPV (talk • contribs)

@GaboPV: Hello,
As it was published on another web site, we need a permission. Please see CO:OTRS for the procedure. You can send it in your language. Regards, Yann (talk) 07:26, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Asit Kumar Haldar 1913 The Beginning Tagore.jpg

Yann, I think you incorrectly removed the speedy tag from File:Asit Kumar Haldar 1913 The Beginning Tagore.jpg. This file was deleted per Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_in_Category:Asit_Kumar_Haldar as it's only PD in the US, not in its source country, it was then temporarily undeleted and tagged with {{PD-US-1923-abroad-delete}} so that the bot User:Commons fair use upload bot would transfer it the appropriate local wikis. The bot did the transfer, and when done, the bot tagged the image for speedy deletion. For some reason that I can't figure out you declined the bot's speedy. —RP88 05:37, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@RP88: Hello,
Actually this reproduction was also published in USA, so it is OK on Commons. Regards, Yann (talk) 07:31, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Yes it's PD in US. That's the point -- we know it was published in the US in 1913, but we don't have any evidence that is PD in it's source country (India). See the DR discussion. Presumably this is why Fastily deleted it at Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Asit Kumar Haldar. —RP88 07:53, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Also, if you're going to overturn the DR, shouldn't you undelete all of the images that were deleted in the DR? It seems inconsistent to keep the one, but delete the other two. —RP88 07:59, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
@RP88: Hello,
I requested undeletion of the last one in Commons:Undeletion requests/Current requests. As I said there, the original might not be in the public domain in India, but this reproduction is in the public domain where it was published. Regards, Yann (talk) 08:12, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
To keep things simple, I'll reply over at the undeletion request, so the commentary is all in one place. —RP88 08:17, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Mumbai Monorail RDs

Hi! This is in relation with following 15 RDs. I don't quite understand how you have decided to keep all these images. Do you mean it's okay to host images on Commons that do not allow derivation? COM:L says "Publication of derivative work must be allowed." (italics in original text)

In case we are permitting this, we have many other sources of Indian Government websites which can be used. Earlier some user had asked me a doubt about [7] and reading and interpreting it i had asked him that we can not host images from pib.nic.in. But can we actually host them? §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 06:52, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Dharmadhyaksha: Hello,
As I said, this does not forbide creating derivative, but only using the documents in a misleading manner. BTW, you should not create 15 different DRs when the issue is identical for 15 different files. Please create a mass DR in this case. Thanks, Yann (talk) 08:36, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
1. It says that it should be "reproduced accurately". 2. You created the DRs after i had requested speedy deletion. I was going to come here and FYI you that you should have created mass DR. But what was done could not have been undone anyways. In addition third point, when you yourself have voted for keeping the images, you shouldn't actually be closing the DR. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 17:20, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Hi again! Whats your say? If there is no change in your opinion, i would like to take others' views on this issue. If you are still working on it, its fine and i won't bother others yet. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 08:13, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
@Dharmadhyaksha: OK, I asked the question here: Commons:Village_pump/Copyright#License_and_copyright_for_Indian_government_documents. Regards, Yann (talk) 08:27, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for opening the discussion. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 10:20, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/File:I.G.P. Khadgajeet Baral (fourth from right) observing the inauguration of the Nepal Police Flying Squad..JPG

Hello Yann, I would like to known why the file I had uploaded was nominated for deletion although the date is correct, and the work is genuine. Regards, User:PurNep (talk) 04:06, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@PurNep: Hello,
"Genuine" doesn't mean anything. You need a permission from the photographer to upload images here. Regards, Yann (talk) 14:30, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Hello Yann,
I have full permission from the photographer. Please reconsider your decision to nominate my files for deletion.
Regards, User:PurNep (talk) 04:06, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
@PurNep: Hello,
Please send the permission to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org. See COM:OTRS for details of the procedure. Thanks, Yann (talk) 09:48, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Picture upload of Ankita Makwana

Dear Yann, I was writing the article for Ankita Makwana for which I uploaded the picture first without having the rights. That's when you took them off. Another editor who was helping me with the article, anupmehra, then suggested me to contact her office for the rights as he has done that before for an actress. I did that and now I do have the right to use her picture for wikipedia. Can you please help me now as to how I should go about it? Would really appreciate your guidance. Thank you so much. Tanja0081 (talk) 22:34, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Tanja0081: Hello,
Please send a permission. See COM:OTRS for the procedure. Regards, Yann (talk) 07:51, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Bandeau de suppression inapproprié

Bonjour Yann,

J'ai bien reçu ton avis de refus concernant le fichier Pinda Sveda ayurvédique.jpg suite à ma demande d'authentification de droits d'auteur effectuée ce 21 février sur Commons : Service d'aide et le comprends parfaitement puisque je me posais moi-même la question. Je m'étonne simplement qu'une simple demande de renseignements aboutisse pour la deuxième fois à l'apposition sur ma page de discussion du même bandeau de violation de droits d'auteur qu'une véritable violation car il contient cette phrase inadmissible dans mon cas : "Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing". Ce qui fait très « mauvais genre » sur une page de discussion personnelle.

N'y aurait-il pas moyen dans l'avenir de distinguer les deux procédures et d'utiliser un autre type de bandeau de suppression afin de ne plus se voir affligé d'une telle horreur après une innocente demande de renseignements ou bien ce procédé est-il destiné à décourager de telles demandes ?

Un grand merci d'avance pour ta réponse. Cordialement : --Anandali (talk) 09:17, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Anandali: Bonjour,
Désolé, mais c'est la procédure habituelle, quand on trouve une image copiée depuis Internet, dont, en plus, il manque la licence. Dans au moins 99% des cas, c'est une violation des droits d'auteur, et nous n'avons aucun moyen de le savoir sans autre information de l'auteur. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 09:26, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of Rick_Berry_Painting_in_his_Studio.jpg?

This picture has explicit consent from Neil Gaiman to be used on this wikipedia page. The picture if from his twitter feed how would I go about getting this image to stay on Rick Berry's wiki page with this permission granted. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by BrittanyInglese (talk • contribs)

@BrittanyInglese: Hello,
You need to send a permission. See COM:OTRS for the procedure. Regards, Yann (talk) 15:06, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

RJ Balaji photo

I have sent OTRS the following mail. Hope it will look acceptable:

The Chennai-based photographer Vithun Ravindran shot a picture of two men: RJ Balaji (the man with glasses) and rapper Aadhi. I have attached the picture to this mail. Although he has given me permission to use the picture on Wikimedia Commons, he has refused to mail OTRS. As a result, I have photographed the written permission he gave and attached it to this mail. Because Balaji is the main subject in the image, I have also attached to this mail a cropped version of Vithun's picture that shows only Balaji.

And attached to the mail are three photos: Vithun's permission, the image of Balaji and another man, and the third one is the cropped version featuring only Balaji. Have I done right? Kailash29792 (talk) 16:28, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Don Suisse reproduction photos

Bonjour Yann, Merci de votre message. J'aimerai compléter l'article existant sur Wikipedia relatif au Don Suisse pour les victimes de la guerre. Pour ce faire, j'ai eu accès récemment au Rapport général sur cette action qui s'est déroulée entre 1944 et 1948. Ce rapport date de 1949 et présente un certain nombre de photographies d'époque dont j'ai cité les crédits des auteurs indiqués dans le rapport. Merci de me dire exactement ce que je dois faire pour utiliser ces documents pour illustrer l'article précité. Dans l'attente de vos nouvelles, avec mes remerciements et mes meilleurs messages. --Swami Prabhu Alol (talk) 20:15, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Swami Prabhu Alol: Bonjour,
Les photos sont dans le domaine public en Suisse 70 ans après la mort du photographe. En conséquence, il faut une permission pour les photos datant d’après 1943. Voyez COM:OTRS/fr pour la procédure. N’hésitez pas à me demander si vous avez besoin d'aide. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 10:30, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yann, re-bonjour, Je me suis renseigné auprès du responsable auprès de la bibliothèque du Parlement à Berne et voici sa réponse: Est-ce que cela suffit ou faut-il faire encore une autre démarche? Merci de vos conseils. Bonjour Monsieur Mayor,

Vous pouvez sans autre utiliser cet ouvrage tant que, en effet, vous citez les références de cet ouvrage. Le droit d’auteur ne serait contrarier que si vous dupliquiez des passages sans en mentionner la provenance ; c’est-à-dire les références de l’ouvrage source. Le livre vous appartenant à présent, la Bibliothèque du Parlement ne peut en aucun cas être impliquée dans l’utilisation que vous faites du contenu de ce document.

Je vous remercie pour votre question et reste à votre disposition pour toute autre information.

Cordialement

Rachel Maturo Bibliothécaire Bibliothèque du Parlement Services du Parlement, CH-3003 Berne --Swami Prabhu Alol (talk) 20:20, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Yann/archives_18&oldid=119069087"