Commons:Deletion requests/2024/03/29

28 March 2024

30 March 2024

Deletion requests on 29 March 2024

March 29[edit]

File:Ymg 000.jpg[edit]

User duncanssmith claims authorship at the same time as noting photograph was taken by Wendy Smith, who doesn't appear to have given permission to use. Quilt Phase (talk) 00:28, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There are other files from the same people in this condition. 186.174.168.209 02:25, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

True, I would like to see how this request goes before tackling the others. Quilt Phase (talk) 03:33, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I imagined and wanted to help you. 186.174.168.209 13:23, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Have discovered a previous successful deletion request for the same user for the same reason: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Possibly_unfree_files/2016_March_7#File:Ymg_003.jpg Quilt Phase (talk) 00:50, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Britanico lineas de tren principal diagrama.PNG[edit]

Es una imagen de baja calidad visual y con faltas de ortografía, que tiene un equivalente SVG traducido al castellano Marion Moseby (talk) 01:09, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Miliziani a Avdiivka 2024.jpg[edit]

Is the uploader a war correspondent? If not, there are several own work claims like this... 186.174.168.209 01:10, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Screenshot from a video, probably copyright violation. 0x0a (talk) 14:57, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Helen Avery.jpg[edit]

Is this an own work? 186.174.168.209 01:23, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

this is my own work Highvoltage113 (talk) 01:47, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:PFLP Logo.png[edit]

Possibly exceeds TOO * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 01:29, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There's no COM:TOO Palestine. Which country's TOO would be relevant? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:38, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep It's still a very simple logo, though Commons:Copyright rules by territory/State of Palestine has nothing about TOO. --SHB2000 (talk) 09:40, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This does not look like a "very simple logo" to me. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 20:00, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Irrelevant. You were asked about TOO for Palestine which has none. I ask for this to be a speedy keep. - Chris.sherlock2 (talk) 21:32, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The fact that Commons has no information on a country's TOO does not mean that said threshold is infinity. It means we don't know what the threshold is. Per COM:PCP if we lack information we err on the side of deleting. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 03:43, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It appears we do have material on this after all. I change my vote to delete after having read Commons:FOP Saudi Arabia. - Chris.sherlock2 (talk) 05:43, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

How is that relevant? Pppery is right, though I don't like it at all when files are deleted just because we're ignorant of whatever legal standard they use - or simply none. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:33, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, if we don't know the TOO we assume it is low. Besides Palestine was a crown dependency and its copyright law was made in 1924 and modelled on British law. This would imply that Palestinian TOO would be quite low since British TOO is quite low (though there are exceptions, such as COM:TOO INDIA). —Matrix(!) {user - talk? - _uselesscontributions} 11:07, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Also COM:TOO Malaysia, COM:TOO Canada, COM:TOO Israel, and probably others. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:02, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think so. Israel abolished "skill and labor" standard in 1989 and now it depends on the Feist ruling, which is quite high as US threshold of originality. Canada also rejected "sweat of the brow" standards. Kys5g^talk! 09:10, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Don't their COM:TOO pages need to be updated, if their criteria are more cramped now? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:53, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Although I don't understand what you mean by "quite high as US threshold." If you're saying their thresholds are high, that's what I said. What else would the word "and" refer to, other than "there are exceptions"? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:55, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mark avery.jpg[edit]

Is this an own work? Has the uploader any real own work? 186.174.168.209 01:29, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is my own work. Highvoltage113 (talk) 01:44, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per above. --SHB2000 (talk) 11:25, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Qasımov Emin Rasim oğlu.jpg[edit]

Likely not own work: scan of existing photo, missing original author, source, date, and permission. P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:51, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed, also adding the very similar File:Emin Qasımov.jpg. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:38, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files in Category:Statue of Mannerheim in Helsinki[edit]

These three images are intentionally focused on the monument. Commercial Freedom of Panorama in Finland does not apply to copyrighted sculptural works. For the date and authorship of the monument, see Commons:Deletion requests/Images of the Equestrian statue of Marshal Mannerheim.

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 03:16, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for filing a considerate deletion request and not just blankly submitting all of the category's files for deletion. I've blurred the statue out of File:2021-06-30 Elokapina Queerkapina 04.jpg. The purpose of this photo is only to inform about the slogans used in a political demonstration. Please withdraw this photo from the deletion. Nemo 18:15, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Nemo bis the blurring is still inadequate IMO. Another blurring may be required. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 22:11, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:สนามบินเชียงใหม่.png[edit]

This work is not original and not own work Pomznp (talk) 04:57, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Max Fischman.jpg[edit]

Copy of File:Max Fishman.jpg same copyright issues Drakosh (talk) 05:14, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:7Feb06Low9thMuralDwonedStopsign.jpg[edit]

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 07:02, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm the photographer/uploader. I uploaded this in 2006 as illustration of the aftermath of a disaster, mural inclusion incidental. (Were I photographing the scene today, I would have made more effort to make photos including as little of the painting as possible.) I'll let others judge this one. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 13:41, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Should the painting be blurred? Thoughts? -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:31, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Never mind. Whatever "the others" say the closing admin will find a way to keep the colleague's work. KEEP per the admin-uploader. 186.174.84.65 16:18, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
If kept please rename, correcting at least the typing mistakes. 186.174.84.65 16:20, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Anon @186.174.84.65: Snark, I'll guess? I've had a number of my uploads deleted as DW problems - mostly from the earlier years of the project when I was less strictly aware of potential problems and the project as a whole seemed to be less often looking for them. It has included a few that I vigorously protested against deletion - very unlike this one. Are you really voting keep? And if so, on what criteria? -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:31, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Anon @186.174.84.65: - artefact of early years of the project, I'm not sure if it was Commons software at the time or interaction between my computer and Commons, but titles with more than 2 blank spaces wouldn't upload, and sometimes 1 or 2 were problems, so I generally didn't use spaces in titles. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:31, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep peer Infrogmation AbchyZa22 (talk) 12:49, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Peer connect? 186.175.112.114 23:43, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:NCAHP Logo.jpg[edit]

The logo of NCAHP used here is not genuine because government of India not released any logo yet. Citizen arindam (talk) 07:23, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
There is a logo contest, but I can't find any winner yet. This image is also copyrighted. -- Valjean (talk) 19:25, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:RN Submarine H-49 in 1919. (50656727252).jpg[edit]

This image is from a blacklisted account. Leoboudv (talk) 09:32, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Is there a problem with the image itself? From the subject matter, it seems pretty clear that it is out of copyright. -- WikiPedant (talk) 17:50, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly public domain. Would need research done on whether it had a known author or an author that cannot be found. Abzeronow (talk) 21:11, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Евгений Деев.jpg[edit]

Unknown author, no reason why this file should have a free licence. Leokand (talk) 10:13, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Thessalonica Montage L.png[edit]

One of the file components of this photo collage (File:Thessaloniki music Hall4.jpg) was deleted for copyrights violation due to the absence of FOP in Greece. As a result, this montage should either be remodeled with the problematic-deleted photo in question deleted or replaced with another more appropriate one. 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ^{ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ} 11:17, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I wish I was notified prior to its nomination for deletion so that I would be given the chance to update it to remove the problematic source. Because it was nominated for deletion without notifying me beforehand, now I am not able to replace/overwrite with a new version. If can we cancel this deletion nomination, so that the option to replace becomes available (this option is unlocked only when a file isn't under nomination for deletion) so that I can replace it with this one: https://i.imgur.com/yAcTh1X.png. This will be appreciated. Edit: my comment was incorrect: turned out the ability to replace photo was due to not being logged-in at the moment I was trying to do so. My apologies for the confusion. --SilentResident (talk) 13:54, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The file has been updated and the issue that had caused the nomination for deletion, has been addressed. My apologies for taking so long. I would appreciate if an admin can disable the earlier revisions of the image, so that no editors may revert back to the problematic versions of that file containing removed photos, in the future. --SilentResident (talk) 14:18, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@SilentResident: Unfortunately, there's still an issue with the file in question as the question here is not necessarily the copyrights status of the file itself, but rather the fact that Greece has no FOP. As a result, no photo of the Thessaloniki Music Hall can be uploaded, or even included in a photo montage as in this specific case, due to copyrights violation. Unless, of course, any law change happens in Greece regarding this issue, something, which, to be really honest, I don't really think that there is any chance to happen. PS. Here's the page with the relevant policy in order for you to get a better grasp of what FOP / Freedom of Panorama is all about ➡️ Commons:Freedom of panorama. 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ^{ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ} 14:47, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi User:Εὐθυμένης, thank you for informing me, the Concert Hall has already been removed and replaced with the Science Museum. Feel free to check it out and let me know if there is anything else I can do. Have a good day!--SilentResident (talk) 15:43, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@SilentResident: Same thing, unfortunately. This museum, as well, is way too recent and unique in its overall design conception in order to fall out of copyrights. Maybe, some building from the "Golden Era" of the city, around the beginning of the 20th century, or something Byzantine, such as the Rotunda or the Eptapyrgion fortress, both of them being some very recognizable landmarks of the city... 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ^{ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ} 17:27, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I believe you, however, from a policy-based perspective, the collage isn't the proper place for contesting each of its individual sources; you will have to raise your concerns in their respective deletion discussions, not here. And if the admins or volunteers who will evaluate your points see there a problem with the landmark's photo, then I am positive they will remove them. If this happens, I will try find some time to update the collage to remove the Science Museum and replace it with one of your excellent recommendations such as the Rotunda. In all case, the collage itself is merely is based on pictures that were not found violating the policies and remain readily available for use, so the collage shouldn't remain nominated for deletion for as long as any of its sources isn't reportedly violating the policies. However, even if the Science Museum isn't nominated for deletion, please feel free to edit and update the collage by yourself to replace the Museum with another landmark of your choice using an image editor of your choice. You are more than welcome to make edits to the collage and my permission isn't required, at all. Have a good weekend! --SilentResident (talk) 00:08, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Patra - CTI (Snowing day - Feb 2006) - panoramio - Michael Paraskevas (2).jpg[edit]

A modern architectural creation. No FOP in Greece. 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ^{ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ} 11:25, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Patra - CTI (Snowing day - Feb 2006) - panoramio.jpg[edit]

A modern architectural creation. No FOP in Greece. 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ^{ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ} 11:25, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Επιστήμη των Υλικών graffiti - panoramio.jpg[edit]

A modern art creation / work of art. No FOP in Greece. 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ^{ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ} 11:26, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Επιστήμη των Υλικών graffiti2 - panoramio.jpg[edit]

A modern art creation / work of art. No FOP in Greece. 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ^{ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ} 11:26, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Logo WTC Nieuwendijk.svg[edit]

no permission no author copied from https://www.wtcnieuwendijk.be/ Hoyanova (talk) 11:54, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sony SL-MV1 and RMT-117 20051001.jpg[edit]

Obviously incorrect license, this is a scan/crop of Sony promotional material. Source is here: https://bouya.officew.jp/sl-mv1/ Hbent (talk) 12:26, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:S-Peterburg Poch gr.png[edit]

Original source of the photo is not provided, no indication the photographer released their photo of the 3D object under a free license, Quick1984 (talk) 13:06, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Reto.jegher@sek1march.ch.jpg[edit]

Suspected copyright infringement: The person depicted cannot be the author at the same time. XoMEoX (talk) 13:26, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files in Category:MacOS logos[edit]

Derivative work of copyrighted logo: en:File:MacOS original logo.svg#Licensing

Nutshinou ^Talk! 14:37, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wappen der Familie Wecken.png[edit]

Wirklich eigenes Werk, also eigenhändig gezeichnet? Oder aus einer Quelle (welcher?) entnommen? Oder aus Elementen unbekannter Herkunft zusammengestellt? GerritR (talk) 14:38, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files in Category:US National Archives series: Card Index of Moving Picture Theaters in Missouri, ca. 1917 - ca. 1919[edit]

Unused files, out of scope. The files contain nothing more than a single cinema name and the corrospondening town the cinema is in. The files are part of a NARA archive series, and the purpose of those records is/was to create a "database" of cinemas. However, we have only 11 27 of those index cards uploaded on commons - the entire set consists of 581 cards. (see https://catalog.archives.gov/id/5397795) Purpose of those cards is to create an index of all existing cinemas - entirety matters in this context. Therefore, those 11 files are out of scope, as they are utterly useless for any educational purpose on their own. Either the entire (linked) collection should be uploaded (althrough the educational value of this is still questionable), or those files deleted.

TheImaCow (talk) 15:56, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

temporarly I withdraw my nomination. I see there are a bunch more uncategorized images which are part of this series within Category:Media contributed by National Archives at Kansas City. I'll go through & categorize, and we'll see if it is complete of not. TheImaCow (talk) 17:04, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've went through all 8000 files at the linked category, and now we're at 27 files which exist of this collection on commons - way too few to be useful for anything, and consider the nomination reopened for those 27 files. TheImaCow (talk) 17:35, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files in Category:US National Archives series: Card Index of Licensed Bakers, ca. 1918 - ca. 1918[edit]

Unused files, out of scope. The files contain nothing more than a single baker's name and the corrospondening address. The files are part of a NARA archive series, and the purpose of those records is/was to create a "database" of issued baking licences. However, we have only 13 36 of those index cards uploaded on commons - the entire set consists of 706 cards. (see https://catalog.archives.gov/id/5111276) Purpose of those cards is to create an index of all issued licences- entirety matters in this context. Therefore, those 11 files are out of scope, as they are utterly useless for any educational purpose on their own. Either the entire (linked) collection should be uploaded (althrough the educational value of this is still questionable), or those files deleted.

TheImaCow (talk) 15:56, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

temporarly I withdraw my nomination. I see there are a bunch more uncategorized images which are part of this series within Category:Media contributed by National Archives at Kansas City. I'll go through & categorize, and we'll see if it is complete of not. TheImaCow (talk) 17:04, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've went through all 8000 files at the linked category, and now we're at 36 files which exist of this collection on commons - way too few to be useful for anything, and consider the nomination reopened for those 36 files. TheImaCow (talk) 17:35, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Amar Bendjama, APS, 20240325.png[edit]

While the video is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution licence, the image in question is not taken by "Algérie Presse Service", but rather the UN Web TV, which clearly indicate that all rights are reserved, as mentioned by Reda benkhadra Riad Salih (talk) 16:07, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with him on certain aspects regarding the origin of the images from the UN WEB. It is true that agencies possess the complete right to purchase, utilize, and distribute content from other media sources globally, which is the case as it is explained in the UNTV website (UN footage is not in the public domain, therefore, any use of the footage must be authorized by the United Nations and a license agreement must be signed between the UN and the requesting client. Licensing fees may apply). If the official agency APS published the content under a Creative Commons license, I believe that the government's official media is primarily focused on compliance with legal regulations. By including the screenshot with the company logo, I intended to signify that the images are being republished under the authority of that particular agency. Regards Riad Salih (talk) 16:13, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Amar Bendjama, APS, 20240325 (cropped).png[edit]

While the video is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution licence, the image in question is not taken by "Algérie Presse Service", but rather the UN Web TV, which clearly indicate that all rights are reserved, as mentioned by Reda benkhadra Riad Salih (talk) 16:08, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with him on certain aspects regarding the origin of the images from the UN WEB. It is true that agencies possess the complete right to purchase, utilize, and distribute content from other media sources globally. If the official agency APS published the content under a Creative Commons license, I believe that the government's official media is primarily focused on compliance with legal regulations. By including the screenshot with the company logo, I intended to signify that the images are being republished under the authority of that particular agency. Regards Riad Salih (talk) 16:13, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Saint-Maurice-sur-Moselle armoiries CG 39 45.svg[edit]

pour améliorer le dessin Rojac55 (talk) 16:35, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Censor steam example.png[edit]

This depicts Yui Hirasawa from the anime K-ON! and is therefore derivative work. ㆀ (talk) 16:54, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep it’s true I did use a free unofficial depiction of Yui as the base, but her hair has been changed from brown to black. I think that’s sufficient to differentiate the two characters since a particular style is not copyrightable and she has no other copyrightable traits of the character in question. For reference far more visually distinct characters explicitly referred to as the character in question have been kept as being below TOO, like File:Marisa get out.png. Dronebogus (talk) 18:57, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:S00 108 Abzw Bulnes, Wegweiser.jpg[edit]

Possible Derivative Work of copyrighted sign. Grandmaster Huon (talk) 17:40, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What about {{FoP-Spain}}? I'm quite sure this applies. Regards, --Kleeblatt187 (talk) 08:19, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per COM:FOP Spain and the work is de minimis anyway. The text is illegible and the map is dark, blurry and unusable. IronGargoyle (talk) 04:03, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Past the automatic courtesy deletion period and looks useful, but did you really take this photo in 1970? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:32, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
No! :) I think the date is wrong... Kızıldeniz (talk) 19:24, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Did you take the photo? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 16:02, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files in Category:Ernst Heller[edit]

Martin Sg. (talk) 21:46, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Matthias Heller is the son of Ernst Heller and so should have the rights to license derivatives of these sculptures. IronGargoyle (talk) 14:55, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kompilatorr.tiff[edit]

This image is almost a duplicate of File: Kompilator.tiff uploaded about ten minutes earlier. The nominated image, however, redacts the user name partially matching the uploader’s username User: Beban. I have now removed this image’s only use. ‑‑ Kays (T | C) 22:05, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Germany Trade and Invest Logo new.svg[edit]

Maybe above COM:TOO Germany. Grandmaster Huon (talk) 22:14, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete on a precautionary basis per COM:TOO Germany, unless additional information indicates it's not above that standard. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:30, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Nothing but text. Yes, the text has a couple of different colors, but this is arranged in a simple geometric pattern. This is below COM:TOO Germany. IronGargoyle (talk) 14:36, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Flag of Hampton va.jpg[edit]

I uploaded a higher quality version of this image Eehuiio (talk) 22:25, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:11-07-31-helsinki-by-RalfR-020.jpg[edit]

There is no commercial Freedom of Panorama in Finland for non-architecture. The author of the plaque, sculptor w:en:Kain Tapper, died in 2004, so this work is still under his posthumous copyright. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 22:31, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files in Category:Sarastus by Daybreak av Wäinö Aaltonen[edit]

There is no commercial Freedom of Panorama in Finland for sculptural monuments. The work dates to 1956 and was authored by sculptor w:fi:Wäinö Aaltonen who died in 1966.

File:Gryning - Sarastus - Daybreak av Wäinö Aaltonen 01.png
File:Gryning - Sarastus - Daybreak av Wäinö Aaltonen 02.png
File:Statue (41792997630).jpg - if the statue is removed, then the image becomes useless as the Flickr file name indicates the statue as the only interesting object

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 22:48, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Aleksis Kivis minnesmärke 01.png[edit]

Intentional / non-de minimis image of w:en:Aleksis Kivi Memorial, which dates to 1939 and authored by sculptor w:en:Wäinö Aaltonen. As the sculptor is not yet dead for more than 70 years, the monument is still under his posthumous copyright. Finland does not have commercial Freedom of Panorama for copyrighted sculptural monuments. See also this past deletion request: Commons:Deletion requests/Statue of Aleksis Kivi. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 22:56, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files in Category:Statue of Pehr Evind Svinhufvud[edit]

These are the non-incidental images of the statue, first publicly-displayed in 1961. The author was w:fr:Wäinö Aaltonen (died 1966). Still under his posthumous copyright, and Finland does not grant commercial Freedom of Panorama for sculptural monuments.

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 23:27, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep File:Stop Fueling War - We Stand with Ukraine 022 Helsinki (51990809639).jpg as I have removed the statue and now the focus is on the placard. --A1Cafel (talk) 07:59, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Why did you upload this in the first place? If you want to upload from Flickr, you need to know the copyright laws of the country of the photo. - Chris.sherlock2 (talk) 05:40, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete the file name is about the state, I don’t see the correlation with the file name. If A1Cafel wants to upload the cropped images under an appropriate file name, go ahead. But this one is needs to go. - Chris.sherlock2 (talk) 05:42, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files in Category:Veijo Rönkkönen[edit]

There is no commercial Freedom of Panorama for copyrighted public art in Finland. The sculptors' author, w:fi:Veijo Rönkkönen, died in 2010. File:Veijo Ronkkonen.jpg is not included as it bears COM:VRTS authorization, whereas these two images don't have.

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 23:53, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]