Commons:Deletion requests/2024/03/28

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
27 March 2024
29 March 2024
Deletion requests on 28 March 2024

March 28[edit]

File:Armoiries Guy Desrochers Coat of Arms.png[edit]

Une nouvelle version, citant correctement le travail d'autrui, a été publiée. Jmpv Nau (talk) 00:45, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Jungle Jingles (1929).ogv[edit]

This was actually renewed under R192732. Undelete in 2025. Unsure about its title card since that matches a public domain one minus the text. SDudley (talk) 02:08, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


File:Demonstration in Bamyan April 24, 2012.jpeg[edit]

This file was initially tagged by 61.5.198.226 as no source (No source) Krd 02:26, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Alfonso Genaro Calderon as Governor of Sinaloa in the 1980s..JPG[edit]

The claimed license is that it is public domain in Mexico, but I'm a bit doubtful on that. The photo is from an anonymous individual and was taken in the 1980s, but I can't identify any particular rationale in the licensing tag that would apply to this case. The best guess is that the uploader claims the work is anonymous, but the source "Sinaloa State" implies to me that this is likely a government photo, which would be copyrighted. In line with COM:PRP, I'm bringing this file here. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 03:11, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kath-ld.png[edit]

This file was initially tagged by Swatjester as Logo (above threshold of originality). Derivative of File:NBC Peacock (2020).png, so we may want to take a look at this at DR rather than actioning a speedy. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 03:31, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Logo Familiada.png[edit]

This file was initially tagged by 185.172.241.184 as Logo. Fairly simple logo, though COM:TOO Poland is relatively low. As such, sending to DR rather than actioning the speedy straightaway. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 03:35, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Close-up of Baphometic Bowl of Wisdom with plaque.tif[edit]

This file was initially tagged by ProfGray as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: photo of artwork in a museum. If copyrightable, this would be a COM:FOP issue, as the United States does not have FOP for sculpture art. I lean towards this being copyrightable, as COM:TOO USA indicates that relatively simple sculptures (such as Chicago's "The Bean") are granted copyright protection, and I thus lean towards deletion. But I don't think it's quite enough for a speedy, so I'm sending it to DR rather than actioning the speedy. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 03:37, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I do wonder if the accompanying plaque would be allowed with just a cropped section of the sculture (helmet). FWIW, I've contacted The Satanic Temple for copyright permission.
In addition, I have an image of a Salvatore Dali print (Black Devil, 1963) as installed at the TST headquarters. I think this could be claimed as fair use for informational purposes and to add significantly to public understanding of how TST hq serves also as an art gallery in Salem MA. Thoughts? ProfGray (talk) 13:29, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Images uploaded under claims of fair use are not allowed on Wikimedia Commons. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 23:29, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Update: I already heard back from The Satanic Temple. Their initial response (two hours ago) is favorable to images such as this Baphometic Bowl of Wisdom. They will get back to me and, at this stage, I still do not have direct written permission. ProfGray (talk) 16:46, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:N612JD - KHPN - 5-10-23.jpg[edit]

Violation of my company policy, asking to be removed. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 03:59, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:N780TW - KHPN - 4-10-23.jpg[edit]

Violation of my company policy, asking to be removed. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 03:59, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:N8CP - close, KHPN - 3-10-23.jpg[edit]

Violation of my company policy, asking to be removed. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 04:00, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:N120AH - KHPN - 20-12-23.jpg[edit]

Violation of my company policy, asking to be removed. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 04:00, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:N780P - KHPN - 22-10-23.jpg[edit]

Violation of my company policy, asking to be removed. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 04:01, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:N698V - KHPN - 11-10-23.jpg[edit]

Violation of my company policy, asking to be removed. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 04:01, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:N7GF - KHPN - 11-10-23.jpg[edit]

Violation of my company policy, asking to be removed. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 04:01, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:N125CH side - KHPN - 2-11-23.jpg[edit]

Violation of my company policy, asking to be removed. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 04:02, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:N7GF - KHPN - 28-12-23.jpg[edit]

Violation of my company policy, asking to be removed. Coldstreamer20 (talk) 04:02, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Jazz Jennings 2024.jpg[edit]

Copyvio. See https://www.usmagazine.com/celebrity-body/news/jazz-jennings-feels-happier-and-healthier-after-70-lb-weight-loss/ EvergreenFir (talk) 04:23, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Coa fam DEU ratibor herzoge.jpg[edit]

fehlerhaft, vgl. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Coats_of_arms_of_Duchy_of_Ratibor GerritR (talk) 06:39, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Logo-topsport-a-lyga.png[edit]

Non-free logo of Lithuanian football league cannot be {{PD-Old}} and does not like too simple to be {{PD-Trivial}} WindEwriX (talk) 06:42, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:A thengal kachari girl.jpg[edit]

Wrong information, this is not the traditional dress of Thengal Kachari's . This is creating wrong information among the public Aandyou (talk) 09:54, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Filenames and image descriptions can be changed easily. You could even do this yourself! Herbert Ortner (talk) 18:01, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


File:TameOne.png[edit]

Small image of a personality without EXIF data, PNG format, probably a screenshot, unlikely to be own work. Yann (talk) 10:06, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Consistent with the relatively few other photos claimed as own work by User:Penndyl, who seems generally good about indicating the provenance of photos that are not their own. Penndyl, can you explain the low resolution and lack of EXIF data (here and elsewhere)? - Jmabel ! talk 10:12, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, it is my own image, however I utilized the snipping tool to crop out others faces before uploading, which is probably why the EXIF is non-existent. That also accounts for the low resolution. Penndyl (talk) 12:18, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:August Neuhaus.png[edit]

wrong date, wrong source, wrong author, wrong license Xocolatl (talk) 10:12, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sergeant 1 Maters (38), Flight Dispatcher (C2S).jpg[edit]

i never give permission to share my name or picture on this site. Bartmaters01 (talk) 12:25, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

From https://magazines.defensie.nl/binaries/large/content/gallery/magazines/03-vliegende-hollander/2019/12/01_papa/car09.jpg. https://www.defensie.nl/copyright reads Tenzij anders vermeld is op de inhoud van deze website de licentie Creative Commons naamsvermelding/gelijk delen (CC BY-SA 4.0) van toepassing. --Achim55 (talk) 13:47, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bjorn Remmerswaal.jpg[edit]

no author given, no permission stated Hoyanova (talk) 13:26, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:TrainingSkanna.jpg[edit]

no author no metadata no permission, depicts minors, used for advertising on nl-wiki Hoyanova (talk) 13:52, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files in Category:Gaietà Renom[edit]

In each case we have an unknown photographer. The subject lived 1913-1997. They are of Spanish origin, which means that they would have to have been published before 1929 to miss the URAA cutoff date and before 1955 to be out of copyright in Spain. In 1929, he would have been 16, which is clearly not the case. In 1955 he would have been 42, which is possible.

.     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:03, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Arezzo-Scudi Medioevali-03.jpg[edit]

Errore nel Titolo (farò il caricamento dello stesso file un'altra volta con il titolo corretto) Ivan.Petrović.Poljak.001 (talk) 14:07, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Munal Chaudhary (talk · contribs)[edit]

The file names and in one case metadata suggest that these files are copyvios taken from Facebook, like several other already deleted uploads by this user. So the files should be deleted per the precautionary principle.

Rosenzweig τ 22:55, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:04, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Munal Chaudhary (talk · contribs)[edit]

Commons:Derivative works from background. Should be removed to keep.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:17, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Вася Ложкин за Пушкина!.jpg[edit]

Commons:Derivative works from modern art. Should be removed to keep. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:36, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Here we have the painter posing for the photographer in front of his work (about a third part of which is hidden behind him). Formally it's not de minimis as far as about 2/3 of the painting is visible. But I would still keep it. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 02:27, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mian Tahir Jameel.jpg[edit]

This is offensive image..and i am sure this is also copyvio Saqib (talk) 14:41, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The "teapot" would appear to refer to a lota. See en:Lota (vessel)#Idioms and literature. Adakiko (talk) 12:01, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Aerial view of Port Alice.jpg[edit]

Historical photo, missing essential info: original author, source, date, and permission. P 1 9 9  ✉ 15:45, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Justice For George Floyd billboard over homeless encampment.jpg[edit]

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 15:48, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Additionally I have added a "De minimis" ("The law does not concern itself with trifles") template/warning on the photographs page.Myotus (talk) 13:30, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The title suggested that the billboard of George Floyd is the reason of taking this photo. Also, if you removed the banner, then nothing interested would be left. --A1Cafel (talk) 03:53, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The homeless are not interesting?! There would be no reason to include the billboard if it was not for the homeless encampment. The issue appears to be with the title rather than with any actual violation of copyright. Again claims of copyright violation in this instance are excessive as De minimis applies and no rebuttal on the matter has been offered. Myotus (talk) 16:29, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Guideline #5 "Copyrighted work X is identifiable and an unavoidable part of the subject, and is essential to the subject (e.g. blacking it out would make the file useless) but the work is shown in insufficient detail and/or with insufficient clarity, so de minimis may apply." In this case it is not clear cut but I would argue it passes. Additionally, I would be happy to change the title to make it less George Floyd-centric if that is the issue. Myotus (talk) 17:00, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@A1Cafel: Why the photo you uploaded to Wikimedia okay, but this photo is not?! It is from the same photographer and of the same place and time with nearly the same framing only the billboard has changed.Myotus (talk) 16:33, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That one is below TOO. --A1Cafel (talk) 05:31, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
??? Myotus (talk) 15:01, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
There is no copyrightable content visible on the billboard in that photo, only the plain text "Twin Cities Curfew / 10:00 pm / Please stay home". Omphalographer (talk) 21:38, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Geen resultaten in deze categorie gevonden, SFA001004583.jpg[edit]

Please delete, since there is already a good version on wiki Mr.Nostalgic (talk) 16:29, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Template:JB2-Moved[edit]

Unused, Category:Files moved by John Bot II to the Commons is empty, bot has not been active since 2009 TheImaCow (talk) 16:36, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

TimedText:Voiced uvular fricative.ogg.fr.srt[edit]

Firstly, subtitles for individual spoken sounds have been deleted uncontroversially before, but from a quick look I can't find the one I was involved in. It might have been on English Wikipedia. Let me know if you want me to unearth it.

This makes a popup show up even in other languages. For example, if you go to Wikipedia:Voiced uvular fricative and play the audio in the "Voiced uvular fricative" infobox, a popup appears even though there are no English subtitles. On the other hand, if you play the audio in the "Voiced uvular approximant" infobox, no popup appears. And for that matter, I'm not aware of any other sounds that have subtitles.

Secondly, I don't think these subtitles even need to exist in the first place. I'm not quite sure how to explain it, but basically, the point of the audio is to demonstrate what a sound sounds like, and normally it's going to be placed on a page that already has a transcription of the sound it's demonstrating ([ʁ]), so there's no need for an additional transcription in the subtitles. At best, for a deaf person, it conveys what vowel is being used, but the vowel is not what's being demonstrated, so I don't see the point.

— W.andrea (talk) 17:21, 28 March 2024 (UTC) [Previously posted prematurely at 16:46][reply]

I would like to add TimedText:Qc-fête.oga.fr.srt to this deletion request. For example, go to wikt:fête#French and play this audio (Abitibi) compared to the others. The same sort of idea applies: Normally this is going to be placed in context (like "this is a Quebecois pronunciation of
fête
") and the file itself is labelled accordingly. — W.andrea (talk) 22:15, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete. I concur - these aren't useful subtitles; they convey no information which isn't already implicit in the filenames. Omphalographer (talk) 21:37, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sheikh Mansur Ushurma.jpg[edit]

No evidence to be free image Ориенталист (talk) 16:52, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dick monaza grafity.png[edit]

Duplicate of File:Monza-graffiti-w020.jpg uploaded 11 years later, supposedly for vandalism purposes ("Uploaded while editing "Joe Biden" on en.wikipedia.org") Nutshinou Talk! 17:31, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I admit to uploading this, and I did not intend to actually make the edit at all to the article, even though I did upload it. I wholeheartedly endorse its deletion and apologize for doing this. ShticktatorTal (talk) 17:54, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:JulieBishop2009.jpeg[edit]

This file was initially tagged by TheImaCow as no permission (No permission since) bjh21 (talk) 17:31, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

see https://tineye.com/search/2599bd193c7907de372a9af8cdf631b3e0cc93a3?sort=crawl_date&order=asc&page=1 - image can be found on the internet since 2008, before being uploaded to wikipedia in 2009 TheImaCow (talk) 17:33, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete: Yes, I think you're correct. Our picture has a background that none of the external pictures has, and is of much higher resolution. On the other hand, Edwinski claimed in 2009 to have taken it "earlier this year" (en:User_talk:Timeshift9/Archive7#Your_Bishop_pic), which is inconsistent with the dates reported by TinEye. And then I spotted en:User talk:Edwinski#Bishop pic which links to a file archived at https://web.archive.org/web/20080727103807/https://www.liberal.org.au/_gm/20080121160945_Bishop120.jpg. Not the same photo, but the same outfit and hairstyle and a very similar background, and dated 2008 in two different ways. Well caught, TheImaCow! --bjh21 (talk) 17:51, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep: I can't see any reason to doubt the licence applied by BotMultichill when it imported the file from English Wikipedia. --bjh21 (talk) 17:33, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
According to the "Original upload log" it was uploaded 2009, but as shown above, the image is already on the internet since 2008 (while without the background, the pose of the women is 1:1 the same. Also the fact that this professionally shot looking photo has a very low resolution and missing exif makes it very unlikely to be own work. Also, the image is not used within articles, and many much higher quality photos exist at Category:Julie Bishop, so I see no reason to keep this one with very questionable sourcing. TheImaCow (talk) 17:41, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:SpaceX rockets.svg[edit]

Image is a fake SVG converted from a png Ergzay (talk) 17:32, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Ergzay, nice ti meet you after a long time. Its not fake i gave cited ehere i got it. I have matched heights. What I have on Wikimedia Commons, I utilized it Chinakpradhan (talk) 09:08, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
If its fake, then, @Ergzay I propose to delete File:SuperHeavyLaunchers.png, File:Falcon rocket family7 - 副本.png, File:Falcon9 rocket family.svg too also bro. Chinakpradhan (talk) 09:11, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Those images are fine as they are not horribly distorted. Also I'm surprised you still have your commons account as I thought you were banned. Ergzay (talk) 17:09, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Code of arms letter germany.JPG[edit]

Vermutlich nicht eigenes Werk, sondern Abbild einer Grafik unbekannten Alters, könnte noch geschützt sein GerritR (talk) 18:27, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Probably cropped from this image: File:Letter From Germany.JPG, dated as 1939. Nakonana (talk) 07:32, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The uploader has uploaded several images and documents of the Leschhorn family, including personal documents such as a certificate of citizenship. The above coat of arms appear to be the family's coat of arms. The uploader's wiki name is also Alex Leschhorn (not that it proves anything, but they might be at least authorized to use those coat of arms; whether they are the copyright holder is a different question). Nakonana (talk) 07:40, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hosenbandorden KursächsischesWappen Honi Soit Qui Mal Y Pense 2023-min.jpg[edit]

Die Zusammenstellung und die Beschriftungen lassen mich zweifeln, ob es sich wirklich um ein "eigenes Werk" handelt oder ob das aus irgendeiner Quelle (Heft? Buch?) entnommen wurde. GerritR (talk) 19:52, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nachtrag: Als vermutliche Quelle kommt auch eine Postkarte in Frage, ein ähnliches Layout ist mir neulich begegnet.--GerritR (talk) 11:04, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:2024-Formula1-Aston-Martin-AMR24-001.jpg[edit]

Infracción de derechos de autor (https://www.wsupercars.com/wallpapers/formula-1/2024-aston-martin-amr24/) XxAlanEZExX (talk) 20:30, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Quiet on Set logo.png[edit]

The scratched effect and torn letters don't exactly make it a simple design and it may reach COM:TOO. Taichi (talk) 21:14, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - The filters and the torn letters on the logo push it past the COM:TOO. Too many elements for commons. Yoshiman6464 (talk) 14:15, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Inmate children at the Rab concenctration camp.jpg[edit]

Wrong description. The photo is of children at the Sisak concentration camp in Croatia, run by Ustaše. Original of the photo available from the Museum of Yugoslavia in Belgrade (inventory number 4846) and the Museum of the Revolution of the Peoples of Croatia in Zagreb (A-255/2). A replacement, higher-quality photo available on request. Everythingaboo (talk) 21:17, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That is photograph from Italian concentration camp on Rab Island

Source is from 1946 Slovenian book Don't delete these photo — Preceding unsigned comment added by Someone897555 (talk • contribs) 10:54, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Deletion_requests/2024/03/28&oldid=876271880"