Commons:Deletion requests/2024/04/25

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

April 25[edit]

File:Caminhos1.jpg[edit]

and

not suitably identified location; and without context has little educational value  — billinghurst sDrewth 00:14, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep. They are almost certainly taken at Ilha do Mel State Park in Brazil. It was a simple question of googling/translating what is on the signs and seeing where a battery of cannons and a "Morro de Baleia" (Whale Mountain) exist in the same place. The latter image was taken on the same day by the same photographer (and is on the coast) so it would follow that it is in the same place. IronGargoyle (talk) 05:05, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:2023 Hong Kong District Council Election Publicity in Tai Po.jpg[edit]

Like the UK terms, No FOP for "graphic works" in Hong Kong. Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 00:15, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


File:Vivat Slovakia art.png[edit]

copyrighted image straight copied from the official website Matroxko (talk) 00:21, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I think, that if I would message the entire Vivat Team, they would agree that the image can stay. I am not claiming this art and even credited the author. And it is not even from the official website. Roman Tička (talk) 13:21, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That is not how this site works. You need explicit permission, not forgiveness. If you really think they would allow the works, you are more than welcome to consult COM:VRT and look into actually getting permission. @Matroxko Copyright violations should get the {{copyvio}} tag, as they qualify for speedy deletion rather than needing to go through the request process. detriaskies 18:01, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Никита Михайлис.jpg[edit]

As per description, the uploader is not the author. 188.123.231.69 00:25, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Alikhan Asetov.jpg[edit]

As per description, the uploader is not the author. 188.123.231.69 00:25, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Benda, Marion ca. 1924.webp[edit]

The person is misidentified--she in not Marion Benda; she is Mary Lange Bixly777 (talk) 00:38, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:International Village Kyrgyzstan (Alilz x Bek).jpg[edit]

This file is used by attackers to blackmail the author Alilzz (talk) 00:40, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


File:International Village Kyrgyzstan 2 (Alilz x Bek).jpg[edit]

This file is used by attackers to blackmail the author Alilzz (talk) 00:41, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


File:Frances Marion, 1918 in uniform during WWI as a war correspondent.jpg[edit]

This is a real image with AI extending out the edges with... well... nonsense. The random fog and squiggles doesn't add anything. Unused and unlikely to be used. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 00:41, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I do not agree. It is very useful for possible insertions into other online content, such as research, presentations, social content. The photo we are analyzing, now having much more "air" around it, makes it much more usable unlike the original version. the fact that the "neutral" background is so as not to alter the original content. adding elements would have been anachronistic and this was not done here. Jack Il Corvo (talk) 08:07, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment. I don't think the AI version should be kept, but could this just be cropped back to the historical photo or replaced with it directly? An image of a WWI war correspondent in uniform is likely in scope. IronGargoyle (talk) 05:15, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Flaks Merowitsch.jpg[edit]

Nonsense PD rationale, this must be treated as per COM:Russia. 188.123.231.69 01:00, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This work was originally published anonymously between January 1, 1943 and January 1, 1946, and the name of the author did not become known during 70 years after publication, counted from January 1 of the year following the year of publication. Now also licensed by COM:Russia. Venzz (talk) 12:05, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Monogram Canvas.jpg[edit]

This file was initially tagged by Wcam as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: G4|Commons:Deletion requests/File:Louis Vuitton portemonnee.JPG; this is definitely not the same image from that discussion, so putting before the community for discussion  — billinghurst sDrewth 02:24, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete as multiple variants of the Louis Vuitton Monogram pattern are registered with U.S. Copyright Office [1] including that shown in this image. Wcam (talk) 02:28, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Erzurum büyükşehir belediyesi logo.jpg[edit]

There is no appropriate copyright authorization information, and it is impossible to determine whether the coat of arms is protected by copyright based on the information provided by COM:TOO Turkey. Fumikas Sagisavas (talk) 02:39, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Nike Air Max 2090.jpg[edit]

image owner(me) requests deletion Doge24190 (talk) 02:46, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:HH-200760444-scaled.jpg[edit]

Copyright violation. This photo is copied from https://www.spoorpro.nl/spoorbouw/2020/06/15/grote-spoorwerkzaamheden-bij-amsterdam-amstel/?gdpr=accept&gdpr=accept (visible with Firefox), where is written: "Bron: Hollandse Hoogte, voor éénmalig gebruik!" (Source: Hollandse Hoogte, for single use only!) I do not see a VRT ticket. JopkeB (talk) 03:17, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Đèn tìn hiệu giao thông đường bộ phố Hoàng Đạo Thúy.jpg[edit]

I (Stvk Công Cuối (VN)) am the author of this media and i want this to be deleted for privacy reasons, sorry for uploaded it in the first place, please forgive me -Stvk Công Cuối (VN) (talk) 15:14, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Đèn tìn hiệu giao thông đường bộ phố Hoàng Đạo Thúy.jpg[edit]

Privacy reasons Stvk Công Cuối (VN) (talk) 05:58, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep and revert to non-blurred version. There is nothing here that violates privacy. Original file version not uploaded in the last 7 days. IronGargoyle (talk) 05:18, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Do the deletion request still open or are now closed/inactive? Stvk Công Cuối (VN) (talk) 07:23, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • I'll upload this (original, non-blurred one) on my alt account after this got deleted, i did not think wisely before upload this on the main account which linked to all of my other internet identity, now i have to delete this for the safety of my life and anonymity of my internet identity before anyone traced this. I plan to upload more of similar photos but that would be too dangerous to upload those on my main account Stvk Công Cuối (VN) (talk) 00:49, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


File:Taffy Dare by thekingofart16.png[edit]

The artwork was originally posted under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported license, but unfortunately it was removed from the source without any evidence of thie author using this license. 💚Kelly The Angel (Talk to me)💚 06:00, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Muslim Wojak Detailed with Obscured.png[edit]

Derivative work of [2] 💚Kelly The Angel (Talk to me)💚 06:12, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Писатель Грибов Юрий Тарасович 4.jpg[edit]

Probably not own work, permission missing. 188.123.231.69 06:12, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Orthodox Christian Wojak.png[edit]

Derivative work of [3] 💚Kelly The Angel (Talk to me)💚 06:12, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Muslim Wojak Detailed.png[edit]

Derivative work of [4] 💚Kelly The Angel (Talk to me)💚 06:13, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Muslim wojak with upper facial features obscured.png[edit]

Derivative work of [5] 💚Kelly The Angel (Talk to me)💚 06:14, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Muslim wojak with face.png[edit]

Derivative work of [6] 💚Kelly The Angel (Talk to me)💚 06:14, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Intuitive-machines-nova-c-lunar-lander.jpg[edit]

Source website credits the image to Intuitive Machines. As such, it is unlikely to be in public domain. Ixfd64 (talk) 06:30, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File talk:Gaetano Salvemini.jpg[edit]

This person is not Gaetano Salvemini but Mario A. Fei. The wrong person has been extracted. DonCalo (talk) 07:23, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Google plus it is END?.png[edit]

Out of scope: low-quality ungrammatical illustration, unused outside userspace. Omphalographer (talk) 07:31, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep. Given the context, I think this is an allowable personal image from a Wikipedia editor with a decent number of mainspace contributions on the Ukrainian language Wikipedia. IronGargoyle (talk) 05:22, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gaetano Salvemini.jpg[edit]

This person is not Gaetano Salvemini but Mario A. Fei. The wrong person has been extracted. DonCalo (talk) 07:32, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Some more engine noise (4276530323).jpg[edit]

This appears to be a low quality image and out of Common's scope. Leoboudv (talk) 07:33, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's a screenshot from a freely licensed video. Honestly, the video would have been a better upload. Abzeronow (talk) 18:11, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:موقعیت موناکو در کره زمین.jpg[edit]

copyvio from Maphill.com - That website offers free images under CC BY-ND 3.0 but those are marked with the word "Free" in the url as per that info page.,
This map can be found under http://www.maphill.com/monaco/monaco/location-maps/shaded-relief-map/ note how the link doesn't denote it as free. Enyavar (talk) 07:47, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ibrahim Sagna2.jpg[edit]

I doubt the license on Flickr is valid. Probably license washing. Yann (talk) 09:12, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, why are you doubting the license on Flickr? 6eeWikiUser (talk) 11:09, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This user has only a few pictures of people, and no follower. Typical account created for license washing. Yann (talk) 11:30, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Okay. I do not know much in the use of Flickr, also account seems to be new at the platform. 6eeWikiUser (talk) 19:19, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Missak Manouchian 1940.png[edit]

Better version at File:Missak Manouchian sous les drapeaux.png RSVartanian (talk) 09:39, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files found with Special:Search/MarsMad97[edit]

Crappy MS paint doodles used on some long-inactive user’s vanity page

Dronebogus (talk) 10:17, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:2020CanadaUSA.png[edit]

Imaginary map, useless Dronebogus (talk) 11:12, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Autonomous Megacities.png[edit]

Only used in a non-contributor’s sandbox Dronebogus (talk) 11:23, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:American way of life.jpg[edit]

See [7]. Life Magazine issues for February 1937 were registered and renewed, i.e. [8]. Yann (talk) 11:26, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


File:1999-12 - 'L'Aiguille et la Porte d'Aval à Etretat' - Marie-Claire Lefébure.JPG[edit]

Marie-Claire Lefébure is not dead since more than 70 years (was still painting in 2000). Therefore not PD-old and not in public domain. No authurisation given Zen 38 (talk) 11:30, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:1999-12-15 - 'Barques sur la Plage et Porte d'Amont à Etretat' - Marie-Claire Lefébure.JPG[edit]

Marie-Claire Lefébure is not dead since more than 70 years (was still painting in 2000). Therefore not PD-old and not in public domain. No authurisation given Zen 38 (talk) 11:31, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:2000 - 'Etretat' - Marie-Claire Lefébure.JPG[edit]

Marie-Claire Lefébure is not dead since more than 70 years (was still painting in 2000). Therefore not PD-old and not in public domain. No authurisation given Zen 38 (talk) 11:31, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Étretat - Les barques.jpg[edit]

Marie-Claire Lefébure is not dead since more than 70 years (was still painting in 2000). Therefore not PD-old and not in public domain. No authurisation given Zen 38 (talk) 11:33, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Île-de-Bréhat - La petite maison fleurie - MCL.jpg[edit]

Marie-Claire Lefébure is not dead since more than 70 years (was still painting in 2000). Therefore not PD-old and not in public domain. No authurisation given Zen 38 (talk) 11:33, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:At the Time of the Louisville Flood- Bourke-White photo 1937 (colorized).png[edit]

See [9]. Life Magazine issues for February 1937 were registered and renewed, i.e. [10]. See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:American way of life.jpg. Yann (talk) 11:33, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


File:Jules Coenegracht (Jonathan Vos Photography).jpg[edit]

no own work, but work of a photographer Thieu1972 (talk) 12:14, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files in Category:Jeremy Brett[edit]

Uncredited, copyrighted photograph by Marcus Tylor, taken from the book https://www.blurb.co.uk/books/1613794-a-roll-with-jeremy-brett (confirmed at https://jeremybrett.livejournal.com/88385.html which includes several photos from it, including this one).

Belbury (talk) 12:22, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok if the uploader was not the copyright holder, then please delete. Judithcomm (talk) 12:44, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:APM (1).jpg[edit]

Not own work 186.172.210.92 12:31, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Abdullah-rushdy.jpg[edit]

Not own work 186.172.210.92 12:47, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Islamic Estelada Blava.svg[edit]

Only used virtually, not a really used flag Brunnaiz (talk) 13:32, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Virtually? It is being used as political symbols on posters throughout Catalonia. SnowieLuna1212 (talk) 21:11, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Image of a non-existent, unused flag, unknown author, and terrorist connotations. Miguel Perdiguero (talk) 12:28, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Adai tribe flag.jpg[edit]

An unhistoric, fictitious flag made for a Kazakh tribe, that, when used, may create intertribal conflicts between Kazakhs. Simply not a file worth having on this website, it will only cause confusion and division. 2001:4BC9:A45:4D27:34D1:4BFF:FE68:2612 13:48, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Leverage Redemption title card.jpg[edit]

I take it that the initial upload was copyrighted or something. Then the uploader added a white page to cover it up? Can we delete both? -- Deadstar (msg) 13:50, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tessa June MerelvanDooren.jpg[edit]

This photo was taken by professional photographer Merel van Dooren, not by the uploader. And the photo was made for this website: https://www.sena.nl/nl/event/artiesten-aan-het-woord-tessa-june No permission has been given by Merel van Dooren. Mondo (talk) 14:31, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AI modified paintings uploaded by User:Fecece[edit]

All these files were uploaded by User:Fefecece, who was blocked last February 26, when it was proven to be a sockpuppet of User:Giorgio Pallavicini, who had already been blocked in March 2023. All the files have the same problem: they are photos of paintings that have been upscaled and 'enhanced', using AI. While it is true that some of the original files are not exactly ideal (small photos), the result of those modified with AI is totally contrary to the intentions of our project. As the PD-Art disclaimer precisely states, the photo of a painting must be "a faithful photographic reproduction of a two-dimensional, public domain work of art". This issue was recently discussed by our community precisely because of another one of these modified paintings uploaded by User:Fefecece. The comment of @Omphalographer: is particularly poignant for me: "Using AI upscaling on a low-resolution photograph of a painting will inevitably result in an image which differs from the original work. No matter how good an upscaler is, it'll never know the difference between a detail which was blurry because it's working from a low resolution photo and a detail which was blurry because the original painting was indistinct (for example). Worse, a lot of AI upscalers are primarily trained on photographs, and will frequently add details in an inappropriate style, like inferring photorealistic, smooth-shaded faces in engravings where those details should have been rendered with patterns of lines". To give a clear idea of how much the AI-edited images differ from the originals, you will find below a table comparing the incriminated files with the source files and, if available, an additional file showing the original painting with correct color grading/details. A final note: the source of some of the files is admittedly incorrect and there is almost never a link back to the original file that was modified. --Kaho Mitsuki (Dis-moi) 14:41, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete. These upscaled images are materially worse than the originals. Whatever tool is being used here is inappropriately boosting contrast, causing detail to be lost. Probably the most obvious example is File:Portrait of Gian Gastone de' Medici, Grand Duke of Tuscany.jpg, where a lot of detail in the background (particularly in the dome to the left of the Duke's face) has been crushed to black; there's similar issues with most of the images listed, as well as some questionable color shifts. Some of these paintings could use higher-resolution images, but they need to be sourced from the actual painting, not machine inference. Omphalographer (talk) 17:02, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Files comparison
File to delete Source file Extra comparative file
 Delete per PD-Art. These so-called "enhancements" are a waste of storage space. - Sumanuil. (talk to me) 03:24, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:BVPRASADTEWIKI.jpg[edit]

Unused personal selfie, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9   14:51, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It is purely Educational , Social, Information value , BVPRASAD is an Editor in the TV satellite Channel , Asst Editor in a Print News Paper and highly qualified . He did MPhil in Communication, MPhil in Education, MSc in Psychology , MSc in Maths, LLM in Law, MEd in Education, MCJ in Journalism
He wrote more than 500 articles in Wikipedia under IIIT Project, His articles Published in News Papers More than 3000, we are uploading un necessary photos in Wikipedia, when we upload useful photos , with no time objection raises , I don't know how can we upgrade our wiki commons in the coming days Bvprasadtewiki (talk) 14:59, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Қазақстанның Еңбек Ері.jpg[edit]

So blurry as to be unusable. Zenwort (talk) 15:13, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:04-13-2019 TAAL VOLCANO DISTANCE FROM TAGAYTAY.jpg[edit]

Trabajo propio? 186.173.20.117 15:31, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Well, my mom took photo of me when i was going home from vacation to Calatagan with my family on April 2019, so please don't delete it. Ryansean071 (talk) 04:27, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:10-15 cm photo.jpg[edit]

Trabajo propio? Escope? 186.173.20.117 15:33, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:18913WhatsApp Image 2021-09-08 at 08.38.33.jpg[edit]

WhatsApp 186.173.20.117 15:34, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kurmanchal kingdom,a medieval himalayan kingdom.jpg[edit]

File not useful for educational context:
The map is untitled, undated and unexplained; the red smear is supposed to show the greatest extent of medieval Kurmanchal / Kumaon (in which year though - 560? 1420?). The talk page claims that it lacks parts of Tibet; and in the west there seems to be missing territory in Afghanistan.
No sources given, and abysmal-looking from a cartographer's viewpoint.
Unused.

(Please also delete the talk page.) Enyavar (talk) 15:38, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Château de la Jayère 1.JPG[edit]

Il s'agit d'une ancienne photo du château qui ne le met pas en avant. Merci de la supprimer. De nouvelles photos ont été déposées sur commons prises depuis la propriété. Pierre Bailleul (talk) 15:42, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour,
Pouvez vous donner des nouvelles si la demande est acceptée ou si il y a d'autres problèmes qui empêche la suppression s'il vous plaît? Merci bonne journée. Pierre Bailleul (talk) 08:51, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cartiera Mediterranea di Barletta.jpg[edit]

copyviol from http://www.comitatoprocanne.com/public/mini/CARTIERA%20CCI01032017.jpg Fresh Blood (talk) 15:44, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wiki rmc estrecho.jpg[edit]

Screenshot of Wikipedia infobox All the best -- Chuck Talk 15:49, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Stable Diffusion AI-generated painting of nude woman.png[edit]

This picture is the user's own work and used for harassment but I deleted this file with F10 criteria because I do not think that this file is in scope. By the reason of User:Dronebogus's request in my talk page, I undeleted it and nominated for deletion. Kadı Message 04:41, 24 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep as uncommon subject— how many pictures of AI generated nude women do we have, let alone ones that actually look this good? Dronebogus (talk) 05:19, 24 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete (on behalf of uploader Benlisquare, who is blocked – see their reply to the DR notification on their talk page) Brianjd (talk) 14:02, 24 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Dronebogus and Kadı: The AI prompt includes names (of artists?). See Commons:Deletion requests/Algorithmically generated AI artwork in specific styles by User:Benlisquare for scope and copyright concerns. Brianjd (talk) 14:14, 24 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete Per Dronebogus, it sounds like there's a lot more that'll need deletion review. ~ Pbritti (talk) 23:11, 24 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Um, I voted keep? And my argument was that it was in scope because it was not a common subject, so why are you seemingly suggesting I said it was common? Dronebogus (talk) 01:49, 25 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Pbritti I agree that your comment makes no sense. Brianjd (talk) 07:21, 25 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

dont remove, i liked it ----modern_primat ඞඞඞ TALK 04:17, 25 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: same as Commons:Deletion requests/Algorithmically generated AI artwork in specific styles by User:Benlisquare. --GPSLeo (talk) 12:10, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Stable Diffusion AI-generated painting of nude woman.png[edit]

Run-of-the-mill AI image. No realistic educational purpose, fails COM:SCOPE. This image seems to have been deleted and undeleted twice before, first because of a request for a full deletion discussion and second due to premature closure of the deletion discussion. Please let this discussion run its proper course. Nosferattus (talk) 15:52, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Porn without any educational value as far as I can see. Don't know why it's still there when the outcome above seems to be delete. Prototyperspective (talk) 16:14, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@GPSLeo: Rhododendrites talk13:44, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:181004 GOSA Dr Baumgärtner Insp Kdo SanDstBw Dittrich 018.jpg[edit]

Contrary to the license tag used, this photo is not in the public domain as an official work in Germany, as it is NOT "part of a statute, ordinance, official decree or judgment", but a random photo from a government (military) web site. I also don't see a free license or similar at the Bundeswehr web site, and the Exif data explicitly claim a copyright. The file is therefore a copyvio and should be deleted. Rosenzweig τ 16:00, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Keksikeke (talk · contribs)[edit]

Not own works. VRT-permission from the creator/photographer is needed.

Estopedist1 (talk) 16:07, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, all those pictures are uploaded by me and they are pictures of me. I am singer, songwriter. I have pay all those pictures and I own copyright for them. so there should not be any problem. Maybe " Estopedist1" want to make some harm for me? Am I right?

Here are my artist links so You can see I am real person and real singer & songwriter and my songs really are played in finnish radio stations so that wikipedia has for example used by radio persons in their speaks when my music is played on the radio. So my pictures are mine and they are free to use when It is about my music and so on...

Wikipedia: https://fi.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antti_Kuosmanen_(muusikko)
Sincerely, Antti Kuosmanen — Preceding unsigned comment added by Keksikeke (talk • contribs) 16:33, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This is obviously false: EXIF in File:Antti Kuosmanen.jpg says Author Jussi Eerola, Copyright holder: Jussi Eerola. Yann (talk) 16:43, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Arminas Stočkus Gabija Domarkaitė.jpg[edit]

from Facebook. Unlike that own work Estopedist1 (talk) 16:08, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Aatu Itkonen 2.jpg[edit]

Not own work. VRT-permission from the creator/photographer is needed. Estopedist1 (talk) 16:14, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ubawin (cropped) (cropped).jpg[edit]

This file should be deleted because it is an AI-enhanced image. KhantWiki (talk) 16:16, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


File:Maxhütte 1900.jpg[edit]

Very likely copyright violation Arnd 🇺🇦 (talk) 16:16, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Maxhütte 1930.jpg[edit]

Very likely copyright violation Arnd 🇺🇦 (talk) 16:17, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Grundsteinlegung Elektrostahlwerk 1992.jpg[edit]

Very likely copyright violation Arnd 🇺🇦 (talk) 16:17, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:CO2-reduzierter Stahl SWT Stahlwerk Thüringen.jpg[edit]

Very likely copyright violation Arnd 🇺🇦 (talk) 16:18, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Algirdas Vrubliauskas.jpg[edit]

unused file, single uploading by the user. Small image. Unlike that own work. Deletion per COM:PCP Estopedist1 (talk) 16:21, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Eberhard Daerr.jpg[edit]

Contrary to the license tag used, this photo is not in the public domain as an official work in Germany, as it is NOT "part of a statute, ordinance, official decree or judgment", but a random photo from a government (military) web site. I also don't see a free license or similar at the Bundeswehr web site. The file is therefore a copyvio and should be deleted. Godihrdt (talk) 16:22, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ernst Rebentisch.jpg[edit]

Contrary to the license tag used, this photo is not in the public domain as an official work in Germany, as it is NOT "part of a statute, ordinance, official decree or judgment", but a random photo from a government (military) web site. I also don't see a free license or similar at the Bundeswehr web site. The file is therefore a copyvio and should be deleted. Godihrdt (talk) 16:27, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Herbert Hockemeyer.jpg[edit]

Contrary to the license tag used, this photo is not in the public domain as an official work in Germany, as it is NOT "part of a statute, ordinance, official decree or judgment", but a random photo from a government (military) web site. I also don't see a free license or similar at the Bundeswehr web site. The file is therefore a copyvio and should be deleted. Godihrdt (talk) 16:27, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Albert Klotz (Sanitätsoffizier).jpg[edit]

Contrary to the license tag used, this photo is not in the public domain as an official work in Germany, as it is NOT "part of a statute, ordinance, official decree or judgment", but a random photo from a government (military) web site. I also don't see a free license or similar at the Bundeswehr web site. The file is therefore a copyvio and should be deleted. Godihrdt (talk) 16:27, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kurt-Bernhard Nakath.jpg[edit]

Contrary to the license tag used, this photo is not in the public domain as an official work in Germany, as it is NOT "part of a statute, ordinance, official decree or judgment", but a random photo from a government (military) web site. I also don't see a free license or similar at the Bundeswehr web site. The file is therefore a copyvio and should be deleted. Godihrdt (talk) 16:27, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wilhelm Albrecht.jpg[edit]

Contrary to the license tag used, this photo is not in the public domain as an official work in Germany, as it is NOT "part of a statute, ordinance, official decree or judgment", but a random photo from a government (military) web site. I also don't see a free license or similar at the Bundeswehr web site. The file is therefore a copyvio and should be deleted. Godihrdt (talk) 16:27, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Jean Ackerman Life 12-05-1938.jpg[edit]

Copyright notice p. 11: [11]. Yann (talk) 16:28, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


File:Karl Wilhelm Demmer.jpg[edit]

Contrary to the license tag used, this photo is not in the public domain as an official work in Germany, as it is NOT "part of a statute, ordinance, official decree or judgment", but a random photo from a government (military) web site. I also don't see a free license or similar at the Bundeswehr web site. The file is therefore a copyvio and should be deleted. Godihrdt (talk) 16:28, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:1968 FAdm Ostertag.jpg[edit]

Contrary to the license tag used, this photo is not in the public domain as an official work in Germany, as it is NOT "part of a statute, ordinance, official decree or judgment", but a random photo from a government (military) web site. I also don't see a free license or similar at the Bundeswehr web site. The file is therefore a copyvio and should be deleted. Godihrdt (talk) 16:28, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Flottillenadmiral Wilhelm Tobias Abry.jpg[edit]

Contrary to the license tag used, this photo is not in the public domain as an official work in Germany, as it is NOT "part of a statute, ordinance, official decree or judgment", but a random photo from a government (military) web site. I also don't see a free license or similar at the Bundeswehr web site. The file is therefore a copyvio and should be deleted. Godihrdt (talk) 16:28, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Generalarzt Dr. Gesine Krüger (l.) übernimmt die Führung der Sanitätsakademie der Bundeswehr von Generaloberstabsarzt Dr. Michael Tempel (r.).jpg[edit]

Contrary to the license tag used, this photo is not in the public domain as an official work in Germany, as it is NOT "part of a statute, ordinance, official decree or judgment", but a random photo from a government (military) web site. I also don't see a free license or similar at the Bundeswehr web site. The file is therefore a copyvio and should be deleted. Godihrdt (talk) 16:28, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Volker Grabarek.jpg[edit]

Contrary to the license tag used, this photo is not in the public domain as an official work in Germany, as it is NOT "part of a statute, ordinance, official decree or judgment", but a random photo from a government (military) web site. I also don't see a free license or similar at the Bundeswehr web site. The file is therefore a copyvio and should be deleted. Godihrdt (talk) 16:28, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Jean Ackerman, Indian Princess Life 12-05-1938.jpg[edit]

Copyright notice p. 11: [12]. Yann (talk) 16:28, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


File:Michael Tempel.jpg[edit]

Contrary to the license tag used, this photo is not in the public domain as an official work in Germany, as it is NOT "part of a statute, ordinance, official decree or judgment", but a random photo from a government (military) web site. I also don't see a free license or similar at the Bundeswehr web site. The file is therefore a copyvio and should be deleted. Godihrdt (talk) 16:28, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hans-Georg Stemann.jpg[edit]

Contrary to the license tag used, this photo is not in the public domain as an official work in Germany, as it is NOT "part of a statute, ordinance, official decree or judgment", but a random photo from a government (military) web site. I also don't see a free license or similar at the Bundeswehr web site. The file is therefore a copyvio and should be deleted. Godihrdt (talk) 16:29, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bernhard Häfner.jpg[edit]

Contrary to the license tag used, this photo is not in the public domain as an official work in Germany, as it is NOT "part of a statute, ordinance, official decree or judgment", but a random photo from a government (military) web site. I also don't see a free license or similar at the Bundeswehr web site. The file is therefore a copyvio and should be deleted. Godihrdt (talk) 16:29, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Georg Finger (Sanitätsoffizier).jpg[edit]

Contrary to the license tag used, this photo is not in the public domain as an official work in Germany, as it is NOT "part of a statute, ordinance, official decree or judgment", but a random photo from a government (military) web site. I also don't see a free license or similar at the Bundeswehr web site. The file is therefore a copyvio and should be deleted. Godihrdt (talk) 16:29, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Matthias Jaeger.jpg[edit]

Contrary to the license tag used, this photo is not in the public domain as an official work in Germany, as it is NOT "part of a statute, ordinance, official decree or judgment", but a random photo from a government (military) web site. I also don't see a free license or similar at the Bundeswehr web site. The file is therefore a copyvio and should be deleted. Godihrdt (talk) 16:30, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Theodor Joedicke.jpg[edit]

Contrary to the license tag used, this photo is not in the public domain as an official work in Germany, as it is NOT "part of a statute, ordinance, official decree or judgment", but a random photo from a government (military) web site. I also don't see a free license or similar at the Bundeswehr web site. The file is therefore a copyvio and should be deleted. Godihrdt (talk) 16:30, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Flottillenadmiral Jens Nemeyer.jpg[edit]

Contrary to the license tag used, this photo is not in the public domain as an official work in Germany, as it is NOT "part of a statute, ordinance, official decree or judgment", but a random photo from a government (military) web site. I also don't see a free license or similar at the Bundeswehr web site. The file is therefore a copyvio and should be deleted. Godihrdt (talk) 16:30, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Karsten Ocker.jpg[edit]

Contrary to the license tag used, this photo is not in the public domain as an official work in Germany, as it is NOT "part of a statute, ordinance, official decree or judgment", but a random photo from a government (military) web site. I also don't see a free license or similar at the Bundeswehr web site. The file is therefore a copyvio and should be deleted. Godihrdt (talk) 16:30, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Roland Hemeling.jpg[edit]

Contrary to the license tag used, this photo is not in the public domain as an official work in Germany, as it is NOT "part of a statute, ordinance, official decree or judgment", but a random photo from a government (military) web site. I also don't see a free license or similar at the Bundeswehr web site. The file is therefore a copyvio and should be deleted. Godihrdt (talk) 16:31, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gunter Desch.jpg[edit]

Contrary to the license tag used, this photo is not in the public domain as an official work in Germany, as it is NOT "part of a statute, ordinance, official decree or judgment", but a random photo from a government (military) web site. I also don't see a free license or similar at the Bundeswehr web site. The file is therefore a copyvio and should be deleted. Godihrdt (talk) 16:31, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Erika Franke.jpg[edit]

Contrary to the license tag used, this photo is not in the public domain as an official work in Germany, as it is NOT "part of a statute, ordinance, official decree or judgment", but a random photo from a government (military) web site. I also don't see a free license or similar at the Bundeswehr web site. The file is therefore a copyvio and should be deleted. Godihrdt (talk) 16:31, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mit einem Handschlag besiegelt Generaloberstabarzt Dr. Michael Tempel (M.) die Kommandoübergabe von Generalstabsarzt Dr. Erika Franke (l.) an Generalarzt Dr. Gesine Krüger (r.).jpg[edit]

Contrary to the license tag used, this photo is not in the public domain as an official work in Germany, as it is NOT "part of a statute, ordinance, official decree or judgment", but a random photo from a government (military) web site. I also don't see a free license or similar at the Bundeswehr web site. The file is therefore a copyvio and should be deleted. Godihrdt (talk) 16:31, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ingo Patschke.jpg[edit]

Contrary to the license tag used, this photo is not in the public domain as an official work in Germany, as it is NOT "part of a statute, ordinance, official decree or judgment", but a random photo from a government (military) web site. I also don't see a free license or similar at the Bundeswehr web site. The file is therefore a copyvio and should be deleted. Godihrdt (talk) 16:32, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wolfgang Krawietz.jpg[edit]

Contrary to the license tag used, this photo is not in the public domain as an official work in Germany, as it is NOT "part of a statute, ordinance, official decree or judgment", but a random photo from a government (military) web site. I also don't see a free license or similar at the Bundeswehr web site. The file is therefore a copyvio and should be deleted. Godihrdt (talk) 16:32, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hubertus Grunhofer.jpg[edit]

Contrary to the license tag used, this photo is not in the public domain as an official work in Germany, as it is NOT "part of a statute, ordinance, official decree or judgment", but a random photo from a government (military) web site. I also don't see a free license or similar at the Bundeswehr web site. The file is therefore a copyvio and should be deleted. Godihrdt (talk) 16:32, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Jürgen Blätzinger.jpg[edit]

Contrary to the license tag used, this photo is not in the public domain as an official work in Germany, as it is NOT "part of a statute, ordinance, official decree or judgment", but a random photo from a government (military) web site. I also don't see a free license or similar at the Bundeswehr web site. The file is therefore a copyvio and should be deleted. Godihrdt (talk) 16:32, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Title- Life - Oil (8553952439).jpg[edit]

Copyright notice p.7: [13]. Life Magazine issues for 1937 and 1938 were registered and renewed, i.e. [14], [15]. Yann (talk) 16:38, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:JRussell.jpg[edit]

Maybe this can be kept; but uploader wrote on Wikipedia ([16]) "I hired the photographer that took the photo and have rights to the image." - so it is not "own work" Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 16:47, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I just got off the phone with the photographer and he said I own the image and that I created the file that was uploaded. He confirmed we have permission to post. GableGotwalsLaw (talk) 16:53, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@GableGotwalsLaw, that's not how this works. Was there a signed legal document transferring ownership to you personally? 57.140.16.48 17:19, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Someone who claims to be the photographer has now posted here. They seem to be saying there is joint ownership. I'm not sure how that would work. 57.140.16.48 19:43, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A duplicate copy of the image (albeit at lower resolution) has been uploaded, at File:Russell John.jpg. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 14:15, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:André Rolet 1937.png[edit]

Copyright notice p.21: [17]. Life Magazine issues for 1937 were registered and renewed, i.e. [18]: B354341. Yann (talk) 16:48, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Life attributes the photograph to "European" [19]. Possibly the name of a photo agency active at that time. The contest itself was on 19 September 1937 in Paris and was backed by two Parisian newspapers. The photo was likely first published in France in September 1937 but the publication in Life on 11 October 1937 probably makes this publication a U.S. publication for the U.S. law. -- Asclepias (talk) 16:16, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


File:Silesaurus Silhouette.png[edit]

Explicitly has non-commercial license IJReid (talk) 17:45, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:PMT Logo 2000x1000px Purple.png[edit]

This file was initially tagged by Grandmaster Huon as Logo: Not above COM:TOO US but maybe above COM:TOO UK. —Matrix(!) {user - talk? - uselesscontributions} 17:49, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:COLDSPLAY (32816990783).jpg[edit]

This file was initially tagged by Grandmaster Huon as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Derivative work of copyrighted material. Derivative of copyrighted prints in clothing.: Some of these prints are below TOO, also the ones that aren't might be COM:DM. —Matrix(!) {user - talk? - uselesscontributions} 17:51, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Проф. Мати Пинкас.jpg[edit]

Явно ложные сведения об авторстве, времени создания и лицензии: https://digilib.nalis.bg/xmlui/handle/nls/26076; фото сделано в 1950-60-е годы -- Tomasina (talk) 18:31, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Jonathan Seagullis.jpg[edit]

Disparaging image collage of living person. COM:IDENT says "Images must not unfairly ridicule or demean the subject". Counterfeit Purses (talk) 19:43, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's a bad pun at worst, to illustrate a (minor) newsworthy event. I think it's a lot harder to understad without the photograph you unilaterally removed. Do I think it should be used outside the reporting? Probably not unless this becomes a much bigger event than it currently is. But it's extreme hyperbole to call it "unfair ridicule" or "demeaning" in a country with the Liz Truss lettuce Adam Cuerden (talk) 22:36, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You literally recreated schoolboy ridicule of a teacher. Counterfeit Purses (talk) 04:28, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
A newsworthy one, though. Not by any means advocating for it to go on his page or anything. Adam Cuerden (talk) 12:39, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Circulatory system.jpg[edit]

Low quality diagram and photograph. Jmarchn (talk) 20:38, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:2024-04-25 2Фрида Биллиет в Мейсе с Philodendron billietiae, май 2019 г. Фото Эними ван Стинберге.png[edit]

неправильный перевод Ko tamakami (talk) 21:10, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Clause 63 Warning[edit]

Unused template funplussmart (talk) 21:15, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ґодзілла 2014.jpg[edit]

Clear copyright violation Dronebogus (talk) 21:48, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Godzilla King of the Monsters Fan Poster.jpg[edit]

Copyright violation Dronebogus (talk) 21:48, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ґодзілла 2014 Білий Фон.png[edit]

Copyvio. Dronebogus (talk) 21:49, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Templar (sign), Leeds. 2011.jpg[edit]

Historic pub sign in the UK. No FoP in the UK for 2D graphical works, but if the sign is old enough, it could be public domain. Abzeronow (talk) 21:58, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Abzeronow: What would be the age theshold on PD in this instance? Rcsprinter123 (talk) 23:38, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Definitely would have to be from before 1954 for the UK Before 1929 for the US. Abzeronow (talk) 23:41, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:General Arnaldo Ochoa.png[edit]

Definitely not an own work but might be free according to COM:ANGOLA. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 23:15, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Temple of Ehécatl - México 2024.jpg[edit]

Likely copyright violation as images and text are not de minimis. Redtree21 (talk) 23:46, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Please refer to Mexican Freedom of Panorama. "Reproduction, communication and distribution by means of drawings, paintings, photographs and audiovisual processes of works that are visible from public places (lugares publicos)." José Luiz disc 04:58, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Temple of Ehécatl - México 2024 (2).jpg[edit]

Likely copyright violation as images and text are not de minimis. Redtree21 (talk) 23:47, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Please refer to Mexican Freedom of Panorama. "Reproduction, communication and distribution by means of drawings, paintings, photographs and audiovisual processes of works that are visible from public places (lugares publicos)." José Luiz disc 23:51, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:China-6764 - Pilgrim (2213518170).jpg[edit]

I haven't seen Disney drawings on the bag Sintegrity (talk) 23:49, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Walk the Labyrinth.jpg[edit]

Contents of the sign are the main subject of the photograph and therefore are not de minimis. Redtree21 (talk) 23:58, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Having the sign allowed me to avoid transcribing its contents and allows naming an open street map entity. Iragersh (talk) 00:32, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]