Commons:Deletion requests/2024/04/24

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
23 April 2024
25 April 2024
Deletion requests on 24 April 2024

April 24[edit]

File:Arc-triomphe-cristo-3.jpg[edit]

COM:FOP France Seawolf35 (talk) 00:07, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Thai road sign R 43.png[edit]

A vector file of traffic signs has been replaced.This removal reorganized the traffic signs. Mongolia44 00:32, 24 April 2024 (UTC)

File:Thailand road sign R-33 10 ton.png[edit]

A vector file of traffic signs has been replaced.This removal reorganized the traffic signs. Mongolia44 00:33, 24 April 2024 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Thailand road sign N13.png[edit]

The traffic sign will not be repeated with the svg file and the traffic sign is a png. File or a gif file, which is not the clearest image, so I have to delete the traffic sign that is wrong from that country's standard. Please allow everyone with respect. มองโกเลีย๔๔ 01:24, 23 April 2019 (UTC)

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 11:55, 20 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Thailand road sign N13.png[edit]

A vector file of traffic signs has been replaced.This removal reorganized the traffic signs. Mongolia44 00:40, 1 November 2022 (UTC)

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Wdwd (talk) 15:12, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Thailand road sign N13.png[edit]

A vector file of traffic signs has been replaced.This removal reorganized the traffic signs. Mongolia44 00:37, 24 April 2024 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:No overtaking THA B-3.png[edit]

A vector file of traffic signs has been replaced.This removal reorganized the traffic signs. Mongolia44 01:58, 10 November 2022 (UTC)

Kept: per discussion. --Krd 06:58, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:No overtaking THA B-3.png[edit]

A vector file of traffic signs has been replaced.This removal reorganized the traffic signs. Mongolia44 00:38, 24 April 2024 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:155NMMOK.jpg[edit]

Out of scope Picture​ on sign. มองโกเลีย๔๔ 09:52, 26 December 2018 (UTC)

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 18:07, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:155NMMOK.jpg[edit]

The traffic sign will not be repeated with the svg file and the traffic sign is a png. File or a gif file, which is not the clearest image, so I have to delete the traffic sign that is wrong from that country's standard. Please allow everyone with respect. มองโกเลีย๔๔ 04:37, 4 August 2019 (UTC)

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --DMacks (talk) 03:24, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:155NMMOK.jpg[edit]

A vector file of traffic signs has been replaced.This removal reorganized the traffic signs. Mongolia44 00:40, 24 April 2024 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Priority road sign PW 03 R3-04.png[edit]

The traffic sign will not be repeated with the svg file and the traffic sign is a png. File or a gif file, which is not the clearest image, so I have to delete the traffic sign that is wrong from that country's standard. Please allow everyone with respect.Svg file Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! มองโกเลีย๔๔ 01:52, 26 February 2020 (UTC)

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 19:00, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Priority road sign PW 03 R3-04.png[edit]

A vector file of traffic signs has been replaced.This removal reorganized the traffic signs. Mongolia44 00:44, 24 April 2024 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Priority road sign PW 03 R3-04 1.png[edit]

The traffic sign will not be repeated with the svg file and the traffic sign is a png. File or a gif file, which is not the clearest image, so I have to delete the traffic sign that is wrong from that country's standard. Please allow everyone with respect.Svg file Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! มองโกเลีย๔๔ 01:51, 26 February 2020 (UTC)

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 19:00, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Priority road sign PW 03 R3-04 1.png[edit]

A vector file of traffic signs has been replaced.This removal reorganized the traffic signs. Mongolia44 00:45, 24 April 2024 (UTC)

File:Nieto Sobejano Arquitectos CORDOBA © Roland Halbe.jpg[edit]

nonfree image - has copyright Krok6kola (talk) 01:43, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Paul Landowski - Die Söhne Kains 1900 - Paris, Cour du Carrousel 1968.jpg[edit]

The depicted sculpture has been created by Paul Landowski who died in 1961. Because there is no freedom of panorama in France (confer COM:FOP France) it is unfortunately not free until 2032, and the file has to be deleted. Speravir 01:52, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note, that there are also two redirects: File:Paul LEWANDOWSKY - Die Söhne Kains 1900 - Paris, Cour du Carrousel 1968.jpg and File:Paul Landowsky - Die Söhne Kains 1900 - Paris, Cour du Carrousel 1968.jpg.


File:Orion Confectionery.jpg[edit]

Low-quality JPG images replaced by SVG format Fumikas Sagisavas (talk) 02:27, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Awaiting eclipse at clock 2024 jeh.jpg[edit]

F8: Exact or scaled-down duplicate of File:Eclipse party RU a 2022 jeh.jpg DanielPenfield (talk) 03:08, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, please. I uploaded the same photo by both phone and tablet. Jim.henderson (talk) 14:31, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


File:Margaret Warner Graduate School of Education and Human Development.jpg[edit]

F8: Exact or scaled-down duplicate of File:Margaret Warner Graduate School of Education and Human Development 2022 jeh.jpg DanielPenfield (talk) 03:10, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete please. I uploaded the same photo by both tablet and phone. Jim.henderson (talk) 13:57, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


File:Carlson Library.jpg[edit]

F8: Exact or scaled-down duplicate of File:Carlson Library 2024 jeh.jpg DanielPenfield (talk) 03:13, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete please. I uploaded the same photo by both tablet and phone. Jim.henderson (talk) 13:53, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


File:Schlegel Hall 2024 jeh.jpg[edit]

F8: Exact or scaled-down duplicate of File:William E. Simon Graduate School of Business Administration 2024 jeh.jpg DanielPenfield (talk) 03:14, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Yes, it's my error; I uploaded the same photo both by phone and by tablet. Jim.henderson (talk) 13:45, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


File:Mordecai Richler, guanyador del Premi Llibreter 2013 per "El cas d’en Barney Panofsky” "La versión de Barney" (Crèdit Foto National Film Board of Canada). (9033472584).jpg[edit]

Likely license laundering. Flickr account says that they obtained the photo from the National Film Board of Canada, which indicates that this is not their own work. Additionally, a crop found here credits the photo to Ron Diamond. Johnj1995 (talk) 03:27, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:B.E.H.S (1) Thingangyun.jpg[edit]

unlikely to be own work due to small file size and resolution. probably from Facebook per FBMD metadata Ninja✮Strikers «☎» 03:51, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Flag of Cecil County, Maryland.gif[edit]

Bad GIF, superseded by identical PNG. – Illegitimate Barrister (talk • contribs), 05:31, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kertu Orro.jpg[edit]

Not own work. VRT-permission from the creator/photographer is needed. Estopedist1 (talk) 05:55, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Flag of Flagstaff, Arizona.svg[edit]

There was no correct copyright information before. I used fandom to check that the flag was designed in 1985, but it is not a reliable source, so it is difficult to confirm its copyright status. If the flag was designed on or after March 1, 1989, it should be deleted Fumikas Sagisavas (talk) 06:05, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Source given on the file page supports date as stated on the page. HapHaxion (talk / contribs) 13:51, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Hi, the Flagstaff flag was not designed in 1985 but rather 1983. If you have access to an Arizona Daily Sun archive, there is an image of its flag being hoisted that year. Its details are the same as the one used today. Flagvisioner (talk) 01:01, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Keep:The license is valid and there is clear evidence that the flag was designed as early as February 28, 1989, in 1983 to be precise, so the flag is considered a public domain work and can be kept. Fumikas Sagisavas (talk) 11:06, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dr.Toth Tibor Slachta Margit Nemzeti Szociálpolitikai Intézet főigazgató.jpg[edit]

It's not immediately clear whether this is an AI image (in which case it should never be used as AI images of real people will never be as accurate as photos) or not (in which case it's a copyvio). The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:21, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete per nom
Prototyperspective (talk) 15:54, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Szeretném megtudni, hogyan kellene javítanom, hogy megfeleljen a feltételeknek!? Köszönöm. Idihnab2024 (talk) 12:04, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rita Ray.jpg[edit]

Not own work. VRT-permission from the creator/photographer is needed. Estopedist1 (talk) 06:51, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:VisualStudioCodeHTML.png[edit]

I do not want this on wikipedia, please have it deleted permanently. ShowyMC (talk) 04:45, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Uploaded 6 years ago and in use on 3 projects. Please provide a reason for deletion. --Achim55 (talk) 06:48, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 08:20, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:VisualStudioCodeHTML.png[edit]

This file should be deleted because I am the original owner of this document and I do not want it on wikipedia anymore as I am insecure of it being on this platform. ShowyMC (talk) 07:04, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep Per previous, currently in use in multiple projects, first request years after upload, unclear why uploader is requesting deletion -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:03, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    What projects is this currently being used on?
    I am requesting deletion of this file since it contains personal info on the top left hand site (Website-Showy). It has my name on it that is why I am requesting for it to be deleted.
    I would also like to have my Wikipedia account deleted if that is possible and all of the associated data/information alongside to be deleted as well.
    Thank you! ShowyMC (talk) 06:49, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Пам'ятник Лідії Ліпковській у с.Бабин.jpg[edit]

There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine and the photos violate sculptors and architects copyright. Created 20090. No Permission from the sculptor uk:Салевич Іван Миколайович. Микола Василечко (talk) 07:08, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Личаківське, Могила Івасюка В. М., українського композитора.jpg[edit]

And also

There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine and the photos violate sculptors and architects copyright. Created after 1979. No Permission from the sculptor. Микола Василечко (talk) 07:13, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

And also files from Category:Grave of Volodymyr Ivasiuk

File:Monument to V.Ivasyuk.JPG[edit]

There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine and the photos violate sculptors and architects copyright. Created after 1990. No Permission from the sculptor. Микола Василечко (talk) 07:15, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kitsman Muzey Expozycia.jpg[edit]

Illustrations, photos, newspapers, all with own work claim, but they aren’t. Derivatives of works with unclear copyright status. Museum exposition with author's works. File is a derivative work and sources or permission of the original works are not given. Микола Василечко (talk) 07:17, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Vlag van de VNH.png[edit]

no author given clearly no permission no metadata no offical flag, used for promotion on nl-wiki Hoyanova (talk) 07:36, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:E881.png[edit]

Rendered from a 150px thumbnail of File:Tabliczka E881.svg, unused, redundant Nutshinou Talk! 07:46, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Slimak1.jpg[edit]

Unused low quality version of File:Slimak.png Nutshinou Talk! 07:46, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Peticaunlimited (talk · contribs)[edit]

Out of scope. Collection of personal photos, not in use.

Smooth O (talk) 08:11, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is the most followed sport influenser, tv host, footballer, tournament host and person in Croatia, Serbia, Bosnia and Macedonica with milions of views and very contributing projects. Peticaunlimited (talk) 14:28, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hanger 'Orchidée ailée'.tif[edit]

Missing metadata CollectieDIVA (talk) 08:23, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:President de la republique de madagasikara 2.jpg[edit]

Not free of rights, not own work Aréat (talk) 08:59, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Cette photo illustre mieux les choses car elle fait partie de la déscription que nous voulons montrer RRMiandrisoa (talk) 09:04, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tom Parks (left) Frankie Knuckles (right) at Carol's Speakeasy Feature in Gay Chicago.jpg[edit]

This is a derivative image; a photo of a photo. Who holds the rights to the original photograph? Leoboudv (talk) 09:28, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Logo CoD.jpg[edit]

This file was initially tagged by StomboyCarGeek as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Other version has been deleted in past for the same reason (File:Call of Duty2 Logo.jpg, File:Call of Duty 3.jpg and File:Logo Franchise CoD.png), 3D metallic logo are not simple text. Proper DR is better in this case. Yann (talk) 10:00, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Ese logo no se puede remover porque es simple (too simple) qué contiene solamente con letras como indica el {{PD-textlogo}}. AbchyZa22 (talk) 21:18, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Distorted Force Timeline 2024.png[edit]

This file was initially tagged by Nutshinou as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: G10 Yann (talk) 10:02, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is not exactly advertisement. This file may be out of scope, but it is a different rationale. Yann (talk) 11:48, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Distorted Force Timeline 2024 (2).png[edit]

This file was initially tagged by Nutshinou as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: G10 Yann (talk) 10:03, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Uploader's sandbox says the band was founded by themselves and the article on the relevant band had previously been deleted for being non notable. -- Nutshinou Talk! 10:22, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
OK, but this is not exactly advertisement. This file may be out of scope, but it is a different rationale. Yann (talk) 11:48, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hx49ATct4LU.jpg[edit]

File from https://hapkido-russia.ru/%d0%bc%d0%b5%d0%b6%d0%b4%d1%83%d0%bd%d0%b0%d1%80%d0%be%d0%b4%d0%bd%d1%8b%d0%b9-%d1%82%d1%83%d1%80%d0%bd%d0%b8%d1%80-%d0%b8-%d0%b2%d1%81%d0%b5%d1%80%d0%be%d1%81%d1%81%d0%b8%d0%b9%d1%81%d0%ba%d0%b8/ without a permission. Ignatus (talk) 10:06, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:2024 Iranian consulate airstrike in Damascus.jpg[edit]

Creatur unknown. Even if rajanews licenses under CC it is not their right to upload photos from their sites. Nicola (talk) 10:41, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Knowledge of the creator is not required. If the creator works for Rajanews or if the creator grants rajanews the CC-license, they have the right to upload the photo.
Do you have any indications that Rajanews doesn't have the license? --Eulenspiegel1 (talk) 11:09, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
But is not clear if the creator works for did. Too many "ifs".
We have to have indications that Rajanews has the right to upload this photo - not the other way round. --Nicola (talk) 11:14, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Please see in this subjekt the specialpage of the Wikipedia in germany, because the request by user@Zartesbitter there was: the licence ist no violence of the law. Triomint69 (talk) 11:15, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This question has to be cleared HERE, not in the German speaking Wikipedia. And what is the "specialpage"? Diff? --Nicola (talk) 11:29, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
1-2 users in de.wiki wanted to remove this picture from this article. First the cc license was questioned then the picture was removed because of "rajanews = bad"??
Both removals where opposed from several editors.
Now they try to remove the picture altogether as they had no success in de.Wiki.
  • Keep the picture
,as this will not only affect de.wiki but also several other wikis. The pictures show no sign of alteration as far as I can see. 176.4.199.66 11:50, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The mentioned specialpage is the de.Wiki "license review" page: Result: license is OK. 176.4.199.66 11:55, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
... and the result on this specialpage licence review (page Urheberrechtsfragen) is based on good arguments there and should be known and to be noticed here too. The description "creator unknown" ist the regular procedere in this kind of case, specials in areas like here. Triomint69 (talk) 15:55, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
keep, a nonsense request due to some nonsense discussions on German wiki. The license is OK, the picture fits the content of the article. With these arguments we would have to delete the most pictures of the most dictators and the most documentaries on dictatorship regimes as they mostly are published by a dictatorship agency. Nonsense, sorry keep anyway. -jkb- (talk) 12:51, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This is not the point - the point is, that we do not know, who the creator is and if he or she licensed it. Until now it is only a claim. It has nothing to do with political implications. --Nicola (talk) 12:58, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
+1 delete it. Zartesbitter (talk) 13:39, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Rajanews states on the relevant website: “Content on this site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license”. If no strong reasons can be given, then it can be assumed that Rajanews has the rights to the image. Keep -- Hans Koberger (talk) 14:32, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
By all accounts, Raja News was founded by Meghdad Nili, the son-in-law of Ebrahim Raisi, the current Iranian president. The CEO is Nili's brother. Given this degree of closeness to Iran's centre of power, the assumption that Raja News has the ability to effectively assert a CC licence seems reasonable to me. Keep. Andreas JN466 20:15, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. This image is clearly published under the CC licence by rajanews, so it's perfectly fine. It would be nice if we knew the name of the photographer, but it is not a requirement. BTW there are about 2.7 million images on Commons with Unknown author so it's really not that uncommon. --MatthiasGutfeldt (talk) 14:43, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This refers normally to historical photos and not to those, which are just one week old. --Nicola (talk) 16:58, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment Image comes from IRNA[2], reposted by other Iranian media.[3][4][5] — kashmīrī TALK 15:25, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    I can only translate that the post of rajanews was published on 9:03 p.m. but which date? It it is 1st april 2024 (or later) than it would be a clear copyviolation of rajanews. If the date signature is clear I'll change from keep to delete.
    But the strange think (on both pages) is the left edge of this image, because you can see an completly other images. So this means also for IRNA that this could be a screenshot and not the original image. Alabasterstein (talk) 18:55, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    FWIW, the rajanews page was first saved on archive.org on the morning of 2 April: [6] (All this tells us of course is that it must have been published before that time, but we don't know when.) Andreas JN466 19:40, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Per [7], Ali Naderi, the current head of IRNA, was the editor of Raja News before his move to IRNA in late 2021. Even if the image appeared first on IRNA, these Iranian media outlets are under such close ideological control, so intertwined and aligned in their daily work that I find it hard to believe that Raja News' CC policy would be unknown to IRNA, or something they would want to dispute. Andreas JN466 21:01, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • [8] "Only upload Rajanews images that are from Rajanews photographers (with explicit attribution, usually watermarked). "khamenei.ir", "president.ir", and "Received" images should be uploaded from their source." --Nicola (talk) 16:56, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Keep ... in the description of file of the image is included an amendment to conditions of licence with this wording:
    "This image may have previously contained a watermark, which has been removed from the image and its author and source attributed in the file page description instead. To use this image, ensure that you comply with its licensing conditions and attribute the original author appropriately."
    And it means a special rule of exception for this category of images. The licence is fine and there is no reason to delete. Triomint69 (talk) 19:25, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    .. and Rajanews never told in the description of an image the name of the author/creator - perhaps is to dangerous for this author/creator in the area with the violence conflics there. Your can read this in the answer of the request (special page de.Wiki "license review"): Rajanews publish never the true name and only the description unknown author. Triomint69 (talk) 19:46, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment. A Tineye search finds 31 results elsewhere. The oldest of these is this article from defence24.pl dated 3 April; it already cites Rajanews and Wikipedia as its source. --Andreas JN466 19:28, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment:Rajanews publication date was:
دوشنبه 13 فروردين 1403 21:03 ساعت
That is Monday, April 13, 1403, 21:03 Iranian date = April 1, 2024, 21:03 Gregorian date
The IRNA date is Gregorian April 1, 2024, 19:33... --Tusculum (talk) 06:15, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. This means IRNA was first. However, there are inconsistencies anyway. See my comment above. Alabasterstein (talk) 06:24, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
In my point of view you can see the reflection of a window facade on a protruding building on the left edge of the picture, and not a part of another picture. However, the image may have been taken from a video. --Tusculum (talk) 06:37, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
A reflection with a very straight vertical line although the other vertical lines are not that straight? But also optical it doesn't look like a reflection for me. The concrete facade do not even have the ability to reflect. Alabasterstein (talk) 08:31, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Good point, the more doubt there should be about the copyright of Rajanews. --Tusculum (talk) 08:37, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This is basically original research and has no relevance here. --MatthiasGutfeldt (talk) 14:41, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Despite a lengthy discission, the community has not been able to establish beyond reasonable doubt that the image is in public domain, hence we must err on the side of caution. — kashmīrī TALK 23:46, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
In my opinion, in many cases the community cannot definitively determine whether an image is in the public domain. We are generally not lawyers, detectives or prosecutors. We do not know any possible contracts, compensation etc. between the photographer and IRNA or between IRNA and Rajanews. Rajanews guarantees that the image is under free license. As long as there is no accurate indication of legal irregularities, there is no reason to delete the image. -- Hans Koberger (talk) 07:23, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Rajanews's CC tag should be disregarded IMO, or at least construed as applying only to their own generated content. It certainly does not apply to all content – e.g., logotypes of Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, content of advertisements they run, and so on, are not under CC. Additionally, Rajanews carries adverts of sites with pirated content (e.g., cooldl.net), which sort of exemplifies they attitude to copyright. Frankly, I doubt Rajanews is at all willing to pay for artwork or even employs a photographer. — kashmīrī TALK 10:57, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
We are not talking about logos of Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, content of advertisements they run, etc. This image, used by numerous language versions of Wikipedia, should IMO only be deleted based on clear, proven facts. I don't see it at the moment. -- Hans Koberger (talk) 12:03, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
According to the German legal situation and according to Paragraph 10 of the Copyright Protection Act (https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/urhg/__10.html), a rebuttable presumption suggests that the specified author or publisher in the absence of an called actor in the legal sense, the claimed also has the licence until a mistake has been proven. It must be clarified whether this German law applies and whether there may be similar regulations in another applicable legal system. Triomint69 (talk) 12:26, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
In addition to my previous edit of myself, it should also be noted that this is a question of international private law with regard to copyright. In this respect, the protection principle of the country must also be observed, in this case syria. Triomint69 (talk) 13:01, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Service: Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Syria/de. --Tusculum (talk) 13:25, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the service (german translation). With regard to the original page in English of WP Commons published here now (Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Syria), it should be noted that in the overview there have no reference to no indication of the invalidity of the license can be found. Only: The question remains, the free license also exists in the USA and why this is necessary... Triomint69 (talk) 14:00, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The head of the state news agency IRNA used to be at Rajan News, and Raja News was founded by the son-in-law of Iranian President Ebrahim Raisi. The assumption that Raja News steals images from IRNA seems to me about as plausible as the assumption that RT would steal his images from TASS. Triomint69 (talk) 14:32, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Quite. If Russia Today hosted a picture and asserted a CC licence, but the same image had appeared on TASS an hour before, would we question it? Or would we just say it's the Russian government media machine doing its thing? This is much the same. These are autocratic governments and there is much one can say about that but what is relevant here is that they have, and exercise, control. Andreas JN466 18:49, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, that's how I see it too. -- Hans Koberger (talk) 05:53, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete. --Tusculum (talk) 13:27, 26 April 2024 (UTC) What is relevant here is the fact that Rajanews apparently does not have the copyright. That's why the picture is sometimes referenced with IRNA, sometimes with PressTV as a source, and only in individual cases - also with reference to Wikipedia - with Rajanews. In addition, the picture was published on Twitter before Rajanews or more or less at the same time. The fact that Rajanews claims that all the material on its website is under a CC license is just an assertion. And the fact that the {{Template:Rajanews}} explicitly states that you can only use the template to upload images that name the Rajanews photographer speaks for itself (Only upload Rajanews images that are from Rajanews photographers (with explicit attribution, usually watermarked). Almost all images uploaded using the template credit the author in the original source on the website (see Category:Photos from Rajanews.com). --Tusculum (talk) 16:36, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    PressTV is another Iranian state source. Just like IRNA and Raja News. It's all pretty much the same thing. The idea that Raja News, founded by the Iranian president's "beloved and precious" son-in-law Meghdad Nili and run by his (the son-in-law's) brother Meysam Nili (see [9]), would not have permission to use PressTV content just does not compute for me.
    For reference, in addition to being the CEO of Raja News and being the brother of the president's son-in-law, Meysam Nili is described by iranintl.com as "an advisor to the Minister of Islamic Guidance Mohammad-Mehdi Esmaili" and "a shadowy figure with much influence in many government and state bodies including the state broadcaster (IRIB) and the Supreme Council of the Cultural Revolution where he heads the Hijab and Chastity taskforce." (See [10], published yesterday.)
    Again, this is not a dude in a basement playing fast and loose with CC licences but a powerful figure at the centre of the Iranian government. When his media outfit, Raja News, asserts they have the right to use and license state TV (PressTV) content, I would believe them. Andreas JN466 23:14, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
If "dude" or not, if son-in-law or not - this family business and some people's imagination from what might be has nothing to do with copyright regulations and proper licences. --Nicola (talk) 11:29, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It looks like the picture comes from IRNA. In your opinion, does what you said also apply to IRNA? -- Hans Koberger (talk) 16:56, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Not sure about IRNA, but most Iranian websites don't bother to give credit as Iran is not a member of the Berne convention and there won't be legal consequences for them for that matter. Hanooz 17:42, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for the answer and Rajanews give the information they are the copyright holder, implicitly in the communicated license itself and they never publishes the name of the image. The license seems to be in order, there are no thorough considerations. Triomint69 (talk) 17:10, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ko Omm.jpg[edit]

Copyrighted logo. Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 12:01, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:許志雄大法官.jpg[edit]

Same with File:大法官許志雄.jpg but with lower resolution. S8321414 (talk) 12:02, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Helluvamustache (13916960125).jpg[edit]

This upload by a banned user has no context or identifiable individual. It seems to be a random upload with no educational use for Commons. Leoboudv (talk) 12:18, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep and categorize for type of moustache, and never forget that old photos are almost always in scope. 186.172.105.133 14:28, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:عبد الرزاق سبقاق.jpg[edit]

copyrighted image Riad Salih (talk) 12:56, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:مصطفى ياحي خلال إشرافه على تجمع شعبي.jpg[edit]

copyrighted image Riad Salih (talk) 12:56, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:سيدي علي بلعرابي.jpg[edit]

copyrighted image Riad Salih (talk) 12:56, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Zefzef.jpg[edit]

copyrighted image Riad Salih (talk) 12:56, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Zamek Golesz - Stęczyński.png[edit]

I uploaded a better version of the same picture. Filipny (talk) 13:03, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Butterfly Gardening.jpg[edit]

Own work? Does the user have the copyright of the photos on the bookcover? Wouter (talk) 13:56, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Agrupacion Guayacan Orquesta.png[edit]

Promo shot. A formal written permission for a free license from the copyright holder is needed. Please see COM:VRT for the procedure. Yann (talk) 14:02, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:HHL Logo.svg[edit]

Google prefers the logo file from Wikipedia, which is why the outdated logo file is always pulled into the Google entry. As the trademark owners, we therefore no longer tolerate the old logo being displayed here. HHL Pressestelle (talk) 14:25, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rk.png[edit]

appears to be personal logo; out of scope, no project usage Gnomingstuff (talk) 14:25, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Illustration Whistled Occitan old shepherd 2.jpg[edit]

Malformed AI-generated image; it's intended to depict a style of whistling performed with just the fingers and the mouth, but the AI has put a few random wooden pipes in there. The finger positions also look incorrect. Belbury (talk) 14:36, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Any opinions on the realism of File:Illustration_Whistled_Occitan_old_shepherd_1.jpg? It doesn't have the wooden pipes, but the hands don't make a lot of sense either. Omphalographer (talk) 18:03, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It seems wrong to me for a mountain whistling language, it looks more like someone making a soft bird call than sending a piercing whistle across mountains. https://www.gettyimages.co.nz/photos/occitan-whistle certainly only shows finger-in-mouth whistles. But I'm no expert. Belbury (talk) 06:14, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


File:Amanda Vettorazzo com Manifestantes.jpg[edit]

Olá, eu havia feito o upload dessa imagem e de algumas outras na época porque quis fazer minha primeira contribuição na Wikipédia, só que na época a página dessa moça , que era política, não foi aceita e tudo certo porque entendi as diretrizes. Porém recentemente eles entraram em contato comigo e me solicitaram a exclusão dessa imagem em específico. Como tenho receio de qualquer medida legal pelo uso da imagem dela contra mim, eu gostaria de solicitar a exclusão. Agradeço a leitura e aguardo um retorno. Re4ction7 (talk) 14:49, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:A2D Logo.jpg[edit]

Out of scope --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 14:56, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,
I have created the page and the photo too. It is just a photo of my personal synthetizer that I have myself done. I do not understand why there is an issue ?
Thank you A2DLive (talk) 17:15, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:ASI pubic hair.jpg[edit]

COM:PENIS Spam, Seawolf35 (talk) 15:10, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Part of a ridiculous amount of penis spam on a simple article. Seawolf35 (talk) 15:16, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Files uploaded by GTKRIZ (talk · contribs)[edit]

Credited to Christoph Gruber | BOKU-IT. Unclear if this is the same person as the uploader.

Adeletron 3030 (talk) 15:18, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Christoph Gruber is not the same Person as the uploader. He is one of BOKU's photographers. GTKRIZ (talk) 11:49, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Đèn tìn hiệu giao thông đường bộ phố Hoàng Đạo Thúy.jpg[edit]

I (Stvk Công Cuối (VN)) am the author of this media and i want this to be deleted for privacy reasons, sorry for uploaded it in the first place, please forgive me -Stvk Công Cuối (VN) (talk) 15:14, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Đèn tìn hiệu giao thông đường bộ phố Hoàng Đạo Thúy.jpg[edit]

Privacy reasons Stvk Công Cuối (VN) (talk) 05:58, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep and revert to non-blurred version. There is nothing here that violates privacy. Original file version not uploaded in the last 7 days. IronGargoyle (talk) 05:18, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Do the deletion request still open or are now closed/inactive? Stvk Công Cuối (VN) (talk) 07:23, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • I'll upload this (original, non-blurred one) on my alt account after this got deleted, i did not think wisely before upload this on the main account which linked to all of my other internet identity, now i have to delete this for the safety of my life and anonymity of my internet identity before anyone traced this. I plan to upload more of similar photos but that would be too dangerous to upload those on my main account Stvk Công Cuối (VN) (talk) 00:49, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Files uploaded by Jleaguer (talk · contribs)[edit]

Copyright violation. I doubt whether all of these photographs are "own work". Whatever photo I try, I always get matches with Google lens and Tiney and they were always published before the dates mentioned in the files.

JopkeB (talk) 15:30, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:PICTURES BENOIT TORDEURS Palace Abou dhabi.jpg[edit]

No FOP in UAE. Mosque completed in 2007 Minoraxtalk (formerly 大诺史) 08:14, 14 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: nothing really copyrightable: architecture is not shown, just a candélabre. Ruthven (msg) 18:37, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


File:PICTURES BENOIT TORDEURS Palace Abou dhabi.jpg[edit]

I don't think the chandelier (claimed as the main object by the closing admin) is just a plain chandelier. It is an elaborate one with artistic design, and it does not appear to be more than 70 years old, since the mosque itself is fairly recent. Needs commercial license permission from the chandelier designer. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 15:34, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Vivinho.jpg[edit]

According to the photographer, this photo has not been published until 2006, which means it is copyrighted at least in the United States. Antti T. Leppänen (talk) 15:52, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gravelbike joe.jpg[edit]

Likely not own work, see EXIF data, Facebook photo. Seawolf35 (talk) 15:52, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Files in Category:Buildings in Belgium illuminated as memorials to the 2016 Nice attacks[edit]

EC - Audiovisual Service source says "Information and education only, Non-commercial use"

// sikander { talk } 🦖 16:05, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete, per @Sikander. All three links have "European Union, 2016
Scopes : Information and education only, Non-commercial use" -- Ooligan (talk) 01:00, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Venn Diagram of Intersectionality.png[edit]

A meaningless diagram about how AI relates to gender and race, previously used on a Wikipedia article that claimed it was a figure that showcases how the system is affecting each group and how it creates an intersectionality. The diagram does not do this, it's just a red-yellow-blue Venn diagram where the three circles are "AI SYSTEM", "RACE" and "GENDER" and none of the overlaps are labelled. (How is the overlap of race and gender relevant?) Belbury (talk) 16:17, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete per nom
Prototyperspective (talk) 15:43, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete per nom Palemeditation (talk) 19:59, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Waterton Lake from the top of Bear's Hump.jpg[edit]

License on Flickr is currently non-free. It was licensed PDM for a very short time but Flickr user may have licensed freely by a mistake. File is unused so I suggest to delete. MGA73 (talk) 16:18, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep Dear MGA73, There are 3 images on Commons from this flickr account which tells me that the flickr account licensed his or her images freely in the past. Three images is not an error or a mistake. Finally, all 3 images have the same uploader which suggests that the images were all licensed freely and the uploader noticed this. Moreover two of the images here and here are still licensed freely on the source flickr account. --Leoboudv (talk) 10:46, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment: This evidence suggests that the flickr account owner agreed to license 3 images freely for the uploader since all the other images on his flickr account are not free. I suggest the image be passed. --Leoboudv (talk) 10:52, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment: Sounds like a good reason for the change of license. So I agree that its very likely the Flickr user wanted file to be free to upload on Commons. --MGA73 (talk) 20:15, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Anderson-EA-1-Kingfisher.jpg[edit]

Photo comes from [11] as per the very visible watermark, with the page dated 2019 and the page marked © Aeropedia · 2019- no evidence that the uploader is the creator of the original photo or that the photo has been originally released under a compatable licence by someone who has the rights to do so. Nigel Ish (talk) 16:39, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Brummkreisel BW 2011-08-12 20-37-51.JPG[edit]

Per the fine print on the toy, this humming top was produced in "W-Germany", so after 1948, and this page dates a very similar top to ca. the 1960s. Which means the drawing reproduced on the top is almost certainly still protected by copyright in both Germany and the US, and the file should be deleted per the precautionary principle. Rosenzweig τ 17:12, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by WolfJones (talk · contribs)[edit]

Unlikely to be own works. We need a formal written permission from the copyright holder via COM:VRT.

Yann (talk) 17:16, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Selfie von Flavio Fermi.png[edit]

keine Freigabe - Source: https://www.gaultmillau.ch/starchefs/und-wo-essen-sie-in-basel-gern-flavio-fermi-675397 Mef.ellingen (talk) 17:26, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:طابع ملوك العراق.jpg[edit]

the license on this is clearly wrong and stamps of Iraq are copyrighted for 50 years after the date of publication Mohammdaon (talk) 17:58, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:طابع فيصل الأول2.jpg[edit]

the license on this is clearly wrong and stamps of Iraq are copyrighted for 50 years after the date of publication Mohammdaon (talk) 18:00, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:طابع جمال عبدالناصر.jpg[edit]

the license on this is clearly wrong and stamps of Iraq are copyrighted for 50 years after the date of publication Mohammdaon (talk) 18:01, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Airesolutionone.jpg[edit]

Out of scope: unused AI-generated fantasy image (a sci-fi robot using a computer). Omphalographer (talk) 18:02, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep Good enough, good-quality, no barely any misgeneration (if there is a little it can be fixed in a new version), useful for educational content on several subjects, better than most scifi art / digital art here, and useful in regards to future interface devices (or interface devices in science fiction as a subject for example). Not extremely valuable but useful enough to keep and no valid deletion rationale.
Prototyperspective (talk) 16:06, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete Totally pointless amateur artwork. Commons isn't a personal file host and according to at least one user in this discussion AI artwork is no different then someone creating the same image in Photoshop. So I don't really see any reason to treat it any differently then other types of amateur artwork that we delete on a daily basis as OOS. --Adamant1 (talk) 00:01, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


File:مجلس التعاون العربي2.jpg[edit]

the license on this is clearly wrong and stamps of Iraq are copyrighted for 50 years after the date of publication Mohammdaon (talk) 18:03, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:طابع صدام.jpg[edit]

the license on this is clearly wrong and stamps of Iraq are copyrighted for 50 years after the date of publication Mohammdaon (talk) 18:04, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:مجلس التعاون العربي1.jpg[edit]

the license on this is clearly wrong and stamps of Iraq are copyrighted for 50 years after the date of publication Mohammdaon (talk) 18:05, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:طابع مئوية الدولة العراقية.jpg[edit]

the license on this is clearly wrong and stamps of Iraq are copyrighted for 50 years after the date of publication Mohammdaon (talk) 18:05, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:طابع عدنان خير الله.jpg[edit]

the license on this is clearly wrong and stamps of Iraq are copyrighted for 50 years after the date of publication Mohammdaon (talk) 18:06, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:طابع فرنسيس وسيستاني.jpg[edit]

the license on this is clearly wrong and stamps of Iraq are copyrighted for 50 years after the date of publication Mohammdaon (talk) 18:07, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:طابع فؤاد سالم.jpg[edit]

the license on this is clearly wrong and stamps of Iraq are copyrighted for 50 years after the date of publication Mohammdaon (talk) 18:08, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:طابع الجواهري.jpg[edit]

the license on this is clearly wrong and stamps of Iraq are copyrighted for 50 years after the date of publication Mohammdaon (talk) 18:09, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hokushinetsu Football League 2022.svg[edit]

This file was initially tagged by Grandmaster Huon as Logo Yann (talk) 18:09, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

虽然在日本属于公有领域(简单的字母和图形)，但目前来看没有太大保留的必要，可以删除 Tpch32 (talk) 00:23, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Google Translate: Although it is in the public domain in Japan (simple letters and graphics), there is currently no need to retain it and can be deleted. Yann (talk) 08:52, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It is in use, so it can't deleted without a valid reason. Yann (talk) 08:53, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:طابع فرنسيس.jpg[edit]

the license on this is clearly wrong and stamps of Iraq are copyrighted for 50 years after the date of publication Mohammdaon (talk) 18:10, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:طابع جعفر العسكري.jpg[edit]

the license on this is clearly wrong and stamps of Iraq are copyrighted for 50 years after the date of publication Mohammdaon (talk) 18:10, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kayak Club, Liget Street, 2016 Dunakeszi.jpg[edit]

This file was initially tagged by Grandmaster Huon as Logo Yann (talk) 18:11, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 KeepNo valid reason. Sport venue sign. - - Globetrotter19 (talk) 18:21, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:طابع أحمد راضي.jpg[edit]

the license on this is clearly wrong and stamps of Iraq are copyrighted for 50 years after the date of publication Mohammdaon (talk) 18:11, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:طابع نادية مراد.jpg[edit]

the license on this is clearly wrong and stamps of Iraq are copyrighted for 50 years after the date of publication Mohammdaon (talk) 18:11, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:طابع كريم العراقي.jpg[edit]

the license on this is clearly wrong and stamps of Iraq are copyrighted for 50 years after the date of publication Mohammdaon (talk) 18:12, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:طابع علي هادي.jpg[edit]

the license on this is clearly wrong and stamps of Iraq are copyrighted for 50 years after the date of publication Mohammdaon (talk) 18:12, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Henrilelabel (talk · contribs)[edit]

Very unlikely to be own works.

Yann (talk) 18:13, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:طابع محمد سعيد الحكيم.jpg[edit]

the license on this is clearly wrong and stamps of Iraq are copyrighted for 50 years after the date of publication Mohammdaon (talk) 18:13, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:طابع محمد خضير.jpg[edit]

the license on this is clearly wrong and stamps of Iraq are copyrighted for 50 years after the date of publication Mohammdaon (talk) 18:13, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:W. & L. Jordan GmbH.jpg[edit]

This file was initially tagged by Grandmaster Huon as Logo Uploaded in 2015, in use. Proper DR is better. Yann (talk) 18:14, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:WildBrain Spark logo.svg[edit]

This file was initially tagged by Grandmaster Huon as Logo Yann (talk) 18:15, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:KenDickson.jpg[edit]

This is a photo of a photo. Dickson died on 15 February 2013. This is also a crop of a larger version. See here. Copyright? It is the only contribution of the user. Wouter (talk) 19:32, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Chapelle Notre-Dame-du Haut de Ronchamp[edit]

No FOP in France.

JurgenNL (talk) 10:07, 4 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 04:04, 11 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Files in Category:Chapelle Notre-Dame-du Haut de Ronchamp[edit]

No FoP in France and the church is one of the most famous buildings of modern architecture. Its architect is Le Corbusier who died in 1965 and France has a standard of life + 70 years. I suggest to undelete in 2036

Paradise Chronicle (talk) 19:40, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Peter Christian Riemann (talk) 14:36, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • File:Inarguably. - Flickr - Ben Ledbetter, Architect.jpg Information for Paradise Chronicle: This permission dates of: 02:19, 20. Aug. 2020, so I think in terms of a violation, somebody else or a bot might have noticed that immediately. (This image file was originally uploaded to Flickr by Ben Ledbetter, Architect at https://flickr. com/photos/53041695@N00/48939501512. It was reviewed by the FlickreviewR 2 bot on August 20, 2020 and the file was licensed under the terms of cc-by-2. 0)
Peter Christian Riemann (talk) 14:55, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Dear Peter Christian Riemann (PCR), Flickrreview checks whether the photographer released the rights on the photograph, but it cannot (yet) see if the work depicted in the photograph is still protected by copyright or not. The building is still protected by copyright.
On the file depicting parts of the roof, well that's a point of view, one can see much better the structure of the roof on that file than on the files where the whole chapel is depicted. I won't withdraw the DR on that file.
And on the Pino Musi file: There the whole chapel is depicted in prime focus, if kept, it would likely be the only file of a whole Le Corbusier building in France after it was nominated for deletion. Paradise Chronicle (talk) 17:21, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Paradise Chronicle (Diskussion) I don't understand, that your main effort seems to be the extinction of a lot of images which are important for the visual understanding of architecture, thus reducing the quality of Wikipedia as Encyclopedia. Most of these files (uploaded under the Wikipedia articles: Saint Marie e la Tourette and Notre Dame du Haut) sustained for different reasons any deletions since years, despite the surveillance of bots and the supervision of competent users and admins. Everybody who is struggeling in search of exceptions for image-publishing within the limits of French legislation is forced to interpret the code de la propriété intellectuelle (CPI), is bound to a shaky French FoP and has to be regardful towards the Wikimedia rules, which allow commercial usage of files, even if the author has no such usage in mind. Another dramatic handicap for Wikimedia/Wikipedia interests is the existence of the French ADAGP Society, which undermines a European solution and the improvement of FoP. Therefore riding only "No FoP in France" horses and the bureocratic use of "author´s death plus 70 years" as tunnel vision, does not help to develop and broaden worldwide knowledge. In that respect i would argue that the Pino Musi file as derivated work of art (series of photographs) is compatible to French Law and should not be deleted. Peter Christian Riemann (talk) 13:50, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Paradise Chronicle Concerning the Pino Musi File: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pino_Musi Peter Christian Riemann (talk) 13:54, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files in Category:Chapelle Notre-Dame-du Haut de Ronchamp[edit]

No FoP in France and same as above. One has the mention it is in the PD but this can only be for the photograph and not for the building and the scenery of light.

Paradise Chronicle (talk) 19:46, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The photos
show a minor part of the building (altar), are absolutely trivial and non representative for the building as such.
In my view the photo belongs to the de minimis category and shows a technical aspect of how the light is catched. Peter Christian Riemann (talk) 15:05, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files in Category:Chapelle Notre-Dame-du Haut de Ronchamp[edit]

No FoP in France

Paradise Chronicle (talk) 19:47, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello User:Paradise Chronicle, the description of the image is as follows: The Serapeum in the Vila Adriana in Tivoli near Rome was an early model for Le Corbusier for indirect lighting. His sketches date from October 1910. He used this type of "periscopic" tool for a diffused incidence of light in the three chapels of the pilgrimage church in Ronchamp. That means, together with a PD-picture from the "Serapeum" I explain the technical precedent of the lighting system in the side-chapels. Those three photos, belong a) to the de minimis category and form together with the other photo of the Serapeum a context of technical knowldege. In this setting of which the work of art is a mere part, the right of the artist (Le Corbusier) is not violated. If we only follow the rules (author´s/creator`s death + 70 years) and do not inteprete the law (which in France allegedly reads: Zero FoP), then WIKIPEDIA loses the potential of a worldwide Encyclopedia. Peter Christian Riemann (talk) 15:43, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It says at the top of the category that this: a category of a copyrighted architecture and/or artistic work in public space from a country that does not provide Wikimedia Commons-acceptable freedom of panorama (that permits free licensing of images of such works). Please do not upload more photographs or videos of such works, unless their presence is incidental or trivial to the overall image. The Peugeot files, where the chapel is in the background have not been nominated for example. Paradise Chronicle (talk) 17:03, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
To me this is a good example of a trivial image: File:Chapelle intérieure de la chapelle de Ronchamp octobre 2019.jpg (see green lines). And what are "Peugeot files"? Peter Christian Riemann (talk) 12:01, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
With Peugeot files the two files with Peugeot in the filenames are meant here and here. The file you say is trivial depicts a part the believers prays to. And the light coming from the skylight likely symbolizes some sort of the Holy Spirit (or the godsent energy from heaven) or in Le Corbusiers words: the ineffable space. Thats not trivial in my opinion and also quite a popular focus in articles on the chapel like here or here. Paradise Chronicle (talk) 14:03, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The altar as such is trivial to the overall well known building of le Corbusier in the context of the Wikipedia article, no matter how and if it is published in other media. The general problem is that tons of photos and drawings are published in books, blogs and magazines of Le Corbusiers work and that thousands of copyright violations of those publications are floating the internet, whereas Wikimedia act as the good guy. Peter Christian Riemann (talk) 18:37, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Building in Durham, North Carolina.jpg[edit]

Reflections damage already low-quality photo; original author requests deletion. DiscoA340 (talk) 19:55, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Cité radieuse, Marseille[edit]

No FOP in France

— Racconish ☎ 16:32, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, built by Le Corbusier. Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:08, 16 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Cité radieuse, Marseille[edit]

The building was completed in 1952 by Le Corbusier (1887–1965). There is no freedom of panorama in France. The copyright length is 70 years, and the image can be undeleted in 2036.

A1Cafel (talk) 16:49, 18 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:34, 25 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Files in Category:Cité radieuse, Marseille[edit]

No FoP in France, and Le Corbusier, the architect of the building died in 1965. France knows a standard of life + 70 years. I suggest to undelete in 2065

Paradise Chronicle (talk) 20:02, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

OK with the deletion. Sorry. Triplecaña (talk) 14:37, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Genealogia parental.png[edit]

File unused. Mulhomem (talk) 20:16, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Janssens, Abraham - The Agrippine Sibyl.jpg[edit]

very bad quality, very low resolution better File:Van den Hoecke Sibylla Agrippina.jpg, File:Attributed to Abraham Janssens I - The Sibyl Agrippina - Google Art Project.jpg Oursana (talk) 20:18, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Immeuble Molitor[edit]

No FoP in France. Architect Le Corbusier (died in 1965) and Pierre Jeanneret (died in 1967)

A1Cafel (talk) 03:43, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:17, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Immeuble Molitor[edit]

These are some of the more elaborate interior architecture of the building. As France does not permit commercial Freedom of Panorama, these images infringe the posthumous copyright held by Le Corbusier's heirs, or heirs of the furniture and fixture designers.

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 06:13, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I would save at least 08, 09, 14 and 17 as they show quite generic details or furniture under Commons:UA. --Sailko (talk) 15:15, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Sailko the #14 one is problematic. We see the relatively-artistic curved wall. I suspect it is also under Le Corbusier's authorship. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 22:39, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: most as they show distinctive enough architecture. 14 and 17 show that too. Kept 8 and 9 because the architecture shown is too simple for a copyright. --Abzeronow (talk) 20:08, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files in Category:Immeuble Molitor[edit]

No FoP in France. The architect Le Corbusier died in 1965. France knows a standard of life + 70 years and I suggest to undelete in 2036.

Paradise Chronicle (talk) 20:22, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:HILTER logo.jpg[edit]

Possible copyvio: logo of a band CoffeeEngineer (talk) 20:31, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Achimowicz-biography.pdf[edit]

Out of scope: plain text. Please refer to en:Help:Your first article, and be aware that the English Wikipedia does not accept AI-generated content. Omphalographer (talk) 21:11, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. The old guy is an admin. 186.172.4.76 21:53, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete: Clearly out of scope. --Achim55 (talk) 22:01, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:JOJ Plus Logo (2021).svg[edit]

File:Fotos de la sesión 30 de marzo 2024 17.jpg[edit]

Soy el autor y subí esta fotografía por error. Quisiera que fuera borrada porque se ve la cara de una menor de la cual no tengo autorización de padres o tutores ni de ninguna persona que esté a su cargo Manuelgtzf (talk) 21:36, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:1-3 FAR HIMARS.jpg[edit]

Trabajo propio? De quien? 200.39.139.29 21:39, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Es probable acercarse tanto a un area militar, durante unas pruebas de misiles? Si no, borrar ya. 200.39.139.29 20:36, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:KKPark.jpg[edit]

There is no free license for FoP in Myanmar, and buildings are protected by copyright by default, unless it is an illegal building that would disqualify it from copyright protection, or the building is insignificant to the image itself. In addition, the completion of the front and rear construction of KKPark will begin around 2020. There is currently no indication that the building is illegal. Although the owner of the building is involved in multiple transnational crimes, it is still assumed to be a legal building in Myanmar and should enjoy copyright. Fumikas Sagisavas (talk) 23:37, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep. I'm not convinced that there's any distinctive work of architecture visible in this photo. There's very little of the buildings visible, and what is visible is extremely generic. Omphalographer (talk) 01:30, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:2Q2A5399.jpg[edit]

COM:SCOPE, unused personal file Seawolf35 (talk) 02:07, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, categorized. 186.175.1.151 02:53, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept - I close this as it's a clear case. 186.175.1.151 02:57, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:2Q2A5399.jpg[edit]

Reopening: High quality professional photographs worth to be kept. But given source site "metinuca.com.tr" is down and we do not know if a) the license is correct and b) the uploader User:Kubrakalembaykara had a permission for uploading and licensing. Also affected: File:Metin Uca fotoğraf.jpg. --Achim55 (talk) 06:32, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I closed it on the basis of scope, as was clear enough. I think a new Deletion request should be dated as of today for these two files with full Exif. 186.175.1.151 12:17, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Deletion_requests/2024/04/24&oldid=876632258"