Commons:Deletion requests/2024/04/21

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
20 April 2024
22 April 2024
Deletion requests on 21 April 2024

April 21[edit]

Files uploaded by Quentinoaux08 (talk · contribs)[edit]

COM:SCOPE/COM:NOTHOST - unused images of non-notable persons/restaurant. Related article, fr:Burgouzz already deleted.

Эlcobbola talk 00:11, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep the third one. A restaurant does not need to be notable to keep it in Commons. 191.125.32.12 00:35, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It isn't even a very good photo. There's nothing distinctive associated with the restaurant visible in the photo, just a generic storefront with a plain lettered sign. Omphalographer (talk) 03:52, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:HK NP 北角站 North Point MTR Station passageway ads Food Penda 黃子華 Wong Tze Wah Dayo September 2021 SS2.jpg[edit]

copyrighted posters in Hong Kong. Solomon203 (talk) 00:47, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Picture on the wall is likely {{De minimis}}, and if not, it can be blurred. TheImaCow (talk) 19:39, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I think a crop is probably better than a blur, but generally I agree. IronGargoyle (talk) 20:23, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:HK CWB 銅鑼灣 Causeway Bay Great George Street 金百利商場 Island Centre (Island Beverley) 花園餐廳 Sweetheart Garden Restaurant September 2021 SS2 03.jpg[edit]

Copyrighted food menus in Hong Kong. Solomon203 (talk) 01:04, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

How can letters be copyrighted? Keep. 191.125.32.12 01:06, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep A generic listing of products and their prices does not have any creative aspect and {{PD-text}} applies. TheImaCow (talk) 19:40, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:HK CWB 銅鑼灣 Causeway Bay Great George Street 金百利商場 Island Centre (Island Beverley) 花園餐廳 Sweetheart Garden Restaurant September 2021 SS2 04.jpg[edit]

Copyrighted food menus in Hong Kong. Solomon203 (talk) 01:06, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep A generic listing of products and their prices does not have any creative aspect and {{PD-text}} applies. TheImaCow (talk) 19:40, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:HK CWB 銅鑼灣 Causeway Bay 景隆街 Cannon Street 535 Jaffe Road 535 Tower basement mall shop Thai restaurant September 2021 SS2 food menu.jpg[edit]

Copyrighted food menus in Hong Kong. Solomon203 (talk) 01:06, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep A generic listing of products and their prices does not have any creative aspect and {{PD-text}} applies, the product pictures are likely {{De minimis}}, and if not, they can be blurred. TheImaCow (talk) 19:40, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete. As this image is deliberately capturing the menu, I don't think de minimis applies. Beyond that, I think a random restaurant menu like this is probably out of project scope. IronGargoyle (talk) 20:27, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:HK SW 上環 Sheung Wan 皇后大道中 270 Queen's Road Central Mansion shop 莉苑鍋貼美食 New Lily's Food restaurant breakfast September 2021 SS2 02.jpg[edit]

Copyrighted food menus in Hong Kong. Solomon203 (talk) 01:08, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep A generic listing of products and their prices does not have any creative aspect and {{PD-text}} applies, the product pictures are likely {{De minimis}}, and if not, they can be blurred. TheImaCow (talk) 19:41, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete. As this image is deliberately capturing the menu, I don't think de minimis applies. Beyond that, I think a random restaurant menu like this is probably out of project scope. IronGargoyle (talk) 20:28, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:HK SW 上環 Sheung Wan 皇后大道中 270 Queen's Road Central Mansion shop 莉苑鍋貼美食 New Lily's Food restaurant breakfast September 2021 SS2 06.jpg[edit]

Copyrighted food menus in Hong Kong. Solomon203 (talk) 01:09, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep A generic listing of products and their prices does not have any creative aspect and {{PD-text}} applies, the product pictures are likely {{De minimis}}, and if not, they can be blurred. TheImaCow (talk) 19:41, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:HK SYP 西營盤 Sai Ying Pun 均益大廈 Kwan Yick Building 名星海鮮酒家 Star Seafood Restaurant June 2021 SS2 06.jpg[edit]

Copyrighted food menus in Hong Kong. Solomon203 (talk) 01:13, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep A generic listing of products and their prices does not have any creative aspect and {{PD-text}} applies, the product pictures are likely {{De minimis}}, and if not, they can be blurred. TheImaCow (talk) 19:41, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:HK KT 觀塘道 418 Kwun Tong Road APM mall bookshop 三聯書局 JP Books June 2021 SS2 05.jpg[edit]

copyrighted book covers in Hong Kong. Solomon203 (talk) 01:16, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep The two book covers that are visible are likely {{De minimis}}, and if not, they can be blurred. TheImaCow (talk) 19:42, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete. I think the covers take up enough of the image that they are not de minimis. What was already an image of dubious scope becomes even less likely to be used with the covers blurred. IronGargoyle (talk) 21:42, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:HK STT 石塘咀 Shek Tong Tsui 皇后大道西 Queen's Road West shop 唐順興 Tong Shun Hing Tang's Roast char siu rice August 2021 SS2 01.jpg[edit]

copyrighted food menus in Hong Kong. Solomon203 (talk) 01:18, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep A generic listing of products and their prices does not have any creative aspect and {{PD-text}} applies, the product pictures are likely {{De minimis}}, and if not, they can be blurred. TheImaCow (talk) 19:43, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:HK SW 上環 Sheung Wan 皇后大道中 270 Queen's Road Central Mansion shop 莉苑鍋貼美食 New Lily's Food restaurant breakfast September 2021 SS2 07.jpg[edit]

copyrighted food menus in Hong Kong. Solomon203 (talk) 01:19, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep A generic listing of products and their prices does not have any creative aspect and {{PD-text}} applies, the product pictures are likely {{De minimis}}, and if not, they can be blurred. TheImaCow (talk) 19:43, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:HK SW 上環 Sheung Wan 皇后大道中 270 Queen's Road Central Mansion shop 莉苑鍋貼美食 New Lily's Food restaurant breakfast September 2021 SS2 08.jpg[edit]

copyrighted food menus in Hong Kong. Solomon203 (talk) 01:20, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep A generic listing of products and their prices does not have any creative aspect and {{PD-text}} applies, the product pictures are likely {{De minimis}}, and if not, they can be blurred. TheImaCow (talk) 19:43, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Moi dans un mariage.jpg[edit]

per COM:NOT Riad Salih (talk) 01:21, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:HK SW 上環 Sheung Wan 皇后大道中 270 Queen's Road Central Mansion shop 莉苑鍋貼美食 New Lily's Food restaurant breakfast menu May 2021 SS2.jpg[edit]

Copyrighted food menus in Hong Kong. Solomon203 (talk) 01:22, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep A generic listing of products and their prices does not have any creative aspect and {{PD-text}} applies, the product pictures are likely {{De minimis}}, and if not, they can be blurred. TheImaCow (talk) 19:44, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:HK SW 上環 Sheung Wan 皇后大道中 270 Queen's Road Central Mansion shop 莉苑鍋貼美食 New Lily's Food restaurant breakfast September 2021 SS2 12.jpg[edit]

copyrighted food menus in Hong Kong. Solomon203 (talk) 01:25, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep A generic listing of products and their prices does not have any creative aspect and {{PD-text}} applies, the product pictures are likely {{De minimis}}, and if not, they can be blurred. TheImaCow (talk) 19:43, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:HK KT 觀塘道 418 Kwun Tong Road APM mall Cinemas Palace June 2021 SS2 01.jpg[edit]

copyrighted screenshot in Hong Kong. Solomon203 (talk) 01:26, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep everything that could potentially be copyrighted is {{De minimis}} TheImaCow (talk) 19:46, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:HK Quarry Bay 太古城中心 CityPlaza mall shop Eslite Bookstore July 2021 SS2 01.jpg[edit]

copyrighted book covers in Hong Kong. Solomon203 (talk) 01:29, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep the few copyrightable covers that are visible are likely {{De minimis}}, but can be blurred if nessescary. TheImaCow (talk) 19:48, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:HK Quarry Bay 太古城中心 CityPlaza mall shop Eslite Bookstore July 2021 SS2 12.jpg[edit]

copyrighted book covers in Hong Kong. Solomon203 (talk) 01:30, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep the few copyrightable covers that are visible are likely {{De minimis}}, but can be blurred if nessescary. TheImaCow (talk) 19:48, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete The image is likely not in scope and it certainly wouldn't be in scope if the covers were blurred. Several of the books with clearly copyrightable covers take up a large chunk of the image. IronGargoyle (talk) 21:32, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:HK Quarry Bay 太古城中心 CityPlaza mall shop Eslite Bookstore July 2021 SS2 11.jpg[edit]

copyrighted book covers in Hong Kong. Solomon203 (talk) 01:32, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep the few copyrightable covers that are visible are likely {{De minimis}}, but can be blurred if nessescary. TheImaCow (talk) 19:48, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete. The image is likely not in scope and it certainly wouldn't be in scope if the covers were blurred. Two of the books with clearly copyrightable covers take up a large chunk of the image. IronGargoyle (talk) 21:30, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:HK SW 上環 Sheung Wan 德輔道中 Des Voeux Road Central Nam Kee noodle shop July 2020 SS2 03.jpg[edit]

Copyrighted food menus in Hong Kong. Solomon203 (talk) 01:47, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep A generic listing of products and their prices does not have any creative aspect and {{PD-text}} applies, the product pictures are likely {{De minimis}}. TheImaCow (talk) 19:46, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:2011 tsutani pic11.jpg[edit]

similr https://book.morinomiya.ac.jp/pages/shirota eien20 (talk) 01:51, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:AndyCruz.png[edit]

No free license given at the instagram link here: https://www.instagram.com/p/Cr_ZlCGtwb3/?img_index=1 Leoboudv (talk) 01:53, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:HK YL Yuen Long 青山公路 Castle Peak Road 元朗廣場 Yuen Long Plaza March 2021 SSG 104.jpg[edit]

copyrighted posters in Hong Kong. Solomon203 (talk) 01:57, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:HK YL Yuen Long 青山公路 Castle Peak Road 元朗廣場 Yuen Long Plaza March 2021 SSG 07.jpg[edit]

copyrighted food menu in Hong Kong. Solomon203 (talk) 01:57, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep A generic listing of products and their prices does not have any creative aspect and {{PD-text}} applies. TheImaCow (talk) 19:50, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:HK hiking Yuen Long District side road Lau Fau Shan March 2021 SSG 28.jpg[edit]

copyrighted posters in Hong Kong. Solomon203 (talk) 01:58, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Foto citra kirana hasil pemotretan sendiri.jpg[edit]

Taken from copyrighted commercial advertisment video: https://youtube.com/watch?si=24ai5MlQap8vi6FO&v=P4sf3McMQpo&feature=youtu.be Urang Kamang (talk) 02:01, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pekka ja Pätkä.jpg[edit]

nonfree: from film of 1950s Altenmann (talk) 02:03, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:HK CWB 銅鑼灣 Causeway Bay 溫莎大廈 Tao Heung Restaurant menu August 2022 Px3 01.jpg[edit]

Copyrighted food menu in Hong Kong. Solomon203 (talk) 02:25, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep A generic listing of products and their prices does not have any creative aspect and {{PD-text}} applies, the product pictures are {{De minimis}}. TheImaCow (talk) 19:52, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:HK SYP 西環 Sai Ying Pun 水街 Water Street August 2022 Px3 29 King Prawn Restaurant menu.jpg[edit]

Copyrighted food menu in Hong Kong. Solomon203 (talk) 02:26, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep A generic listing of products and their prices does not have any creative aspect and {{PD-text}} applies, the product pictures are {{De minimis}}. TheImaCow (talk) 19:52, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete. Random menu is likely out of scope and the pictures on the menu, while small, remain a focal point of the image. Likely not de minimis because the intent was to capture the menu. IronGargoyle (talk) 21:46, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:HK SYP 西環 Sai Ying Pun 明星海鮮酒家 Star Seafood Restaurant August 2022 Px3 008.jpg[edit]

Copyrighted food menu in Hong Kong. Solomon203 (talk) 02:29, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep A generic listing of products and their prices does not have any creative aspect and {{PD-text}} applies, the product pictures are {{De minimis}}. TheImaCow (talk) 19:52, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:HK SYP 西環 Sai Ying Pun 明星海鮮酒家 Star Seafood Restaurant August 2022 Px3 009.jpg[edit]

Copyrighted food menu in Hong Kong. Solomon203 (talk) 02:29, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep A generic listing of products and their prices does not have any creative aspect and {{PD-text}} applies, the product pictures are {{De minimis}}. TheImaCow (talk) 19:53, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete. Random menu is likely out of scope and the pictures on the menu, while small, remain a focal point of the image. Likely not de minimis because the intent was to capture the menu. IronGargoyle (talk) 21:45, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:HK SYP 西環 Sai Ying Pun 第二街 Second Street shop DCH food store frozen meat August 2022 Px3.jpg[edit]

COM:PACKAGE Solomon203 (talk) 02:31, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep The product pictures are {{De minimis}}. TheImaCow (talk) 19:53, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Glans of the human penis.jpg[edit]

Commons:Nudity#New uploads of penis photo, not special enough to be educationally useful A1Cafel (talk) 02:31, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


File:HK SYP 西環 Sai Ying Pun 德輔道西 Des Voeux Road West 大頭蝦餐廳 King Prawn Restaurant menu August 2022 Px3.jpg[edit]

Copyrighted food menus in Hong Kong. Solomon203 (talk) 02:31, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep A generic listing of products and their prices does not have any creative aspect and {{PD-text}} applies, the product pictures are likely {{De minimis}}, and if not, they can be blurred. TheImaCow (talk) 19:51, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:HK SYP 西環 Sai Ying Pun 德輔道西 Des Voeux Road West shop Tak Lee Chiu Chow Restaurant evening August 2022 Px3 02.jpg[edit]

Copyrighted food menus in Hong Kong. Solomon203 (talk) 02:32, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep A generic listing of products and their prices does not have any creative aspect and {{PD-text}} applies, the product pictures are likely {{De minimis}}, and if not, they can be blurred. TheImaCow (talk) 19:51, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Emblem of Kobаyashi, Miyazaki (1923–2006).svg[edit]

File:Emblem of Kobаyashi, Miyazaki (1923–2006).svg is a duplicate of File:Emblem of Kobayashi, Miyazaki (1923–2006).svg OperationSakura6144 (talk) 02:40, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:José Bruno Cépeda Ruiz.jpg[edit]

Is it an own work? 191.125.32.12 03:04, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Download-5.jpg[edit]

From where did you download this? 191.125.32.12 03:14, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This photo is publicly listed on Paul's IMDb page, which can be found in this link: https://www.imdb.com/name/nm3731362/?ref_=ttfc_fc_cl_t11
The link has also been added to the image source for clarification. Surayeproject3 (talk) 11:36, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Paul Elia.jpg[edit]

See source please. 191.125.32.12 03:16, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sources has been updated to include a link to the original webpage Surayeproject3 (talk) 11:33, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:おまけ (3351564646).jpg[edit]

COM:PACKAGE Solomon203 (talk) 03:17, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Which package?! Keep. 191.125.32.12 03:22, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete – Invalid deletion rationale. This is just a low-resolution photo of a bottle that has text on it. However, it's low quality and doesn't seem useful so I think it should be deleted except if there is a good case for keeping it.
Prototyperspective (talk) 10:22, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files in Category:Hackers[edit]

Out of scope: unused logos and promotional graphics of non-notable "hacker" groups; unused screenshots of defaced web sites.

Omphalographer (talk) 03:36, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Niall Eclipse.png[edit]

Since the sky isn't darkened and the Sun and Moon is larger in the photo than in real life, the image is a very obvious hoax that doesn't have any educational value (because it's a hoax). Sqrt of 2 (talk) 04:18, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ingenious Artifacts (12751101065).jpg[edit]

Per COM:TOYS A1Cafel (talk) 04:31, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:DungeonsMC.png[edit]

Copyright violation, exceeds COM:TOO IagoQnsi (talk) 04:34, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


 Support per nominator Sebbog13 (talk) 11:46, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Appointment of the Ministry in 2023 of the Sixth National Government.jpg[edit]

duplicate of File:Appointment_of_the_new_Ministry_2023.jpg TheLoyalOrder (talk) 05:08, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have requested overwriting permission on the File:Appointment_of_the_new_Ministry_2023.jpg file so that I can upload the version with the colour looking better. Then the wikipedia articles can be changed over to it. Kiwiz1338 (talk) 05:39, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, I support delete now. Kiwiz1338 (talk) 02:39, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dealer's Table (1221500837).jpg[edit]

anime magazine covers from Japan. Solomon203 (talk) 05:25, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dealer's Table (1222358750).jpg[edit]

anime magazine and manga covers from Japan. Solomon203 (talk) 05:26, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Electabro (talk · contribs)[edit]

Fictional electoral maps. Out of scope.

The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:06, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah that's fair. Electabro (talk) 19:49, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:A quiet corner within Salisbury Cathedral - geograph.org.uk - 1903616.jpg[edit]

Image is blurred, details are unreadable. Of little exemplar or educational value. Richard Avery (talk) 06:31, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Chandungsongyi.jpg[edit]

These pictures are taken and released by the artiste's management for promotion in 2022, not taken by Vietnamese user Hihahohe. https://k.sina.com.cn/article_1790550774_6ab9a2f604000yy6m.html NoCringe (talk) 06:34, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:P3091398 k ice.jpg[edit]

unused file, no location given, out of scope Estopedist1 (talk) 07:19, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Shuuro.jpg[edit]

not "own work", see https://tineye.com/search/0eec48f940180c1c63ae3032d758707f93c51a63?sort=score&order=desc&page=1 Mateus2019 (talk) 07:43, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Innahango (talk · contribs)[edit]

Old photo(s). Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.

Estopedist1 (talk) 07:49, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gen. dyw. Wojciech Ziółkowski.png[edit]

Unlikely to be own work (low res, sus exif, present on copyrighted site: https://www.wojsko-polskie.pl/16dz/dowodca16dywizji/ ) 178.37.205.142 07:50, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Armatohaubica K-2.jpg[edit]

copyvio from https://tech.wp.pl/modernizacja-armatohaubic-k9-thunder-koreanczycy-maja-pomysl-jak-je-ulepszyc,6915705949260448a 178.37.205.142 08:01, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Photo of Sheikh Tonmoy Bagerhat.jpg[edit]

Is it an own work? See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Sheikh Tonmoy New Look.jpg. 186.173.196.243 08:24, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dsc 2366k.jpg[edit]

Photograph of a photograph; authorship / copyright unclear. Source indicated is not available online anymore Dans (talk) 08:28, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sheikh Tonmoy New Look.jpg[edit]

Unlikely to be own work, i.e. [1] ([2]) and others. Yann (talk) 08:48, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What about File:Sheikh Tonmoy MP.jpg? 186.173.196.243 09:03, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That's probably the source... but I wonder if the Flickr license is valid. There is a mention "© 2018-2022 Faisal Photography; All rights reserved." And other images of this stream are not under a free license. Yann (talk) 09:36, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Andries Pretorius Statue - VMT.jpg[edit]

Sorry, but sculptor Coert Steynberg died only in 1982, whereby his works are in copyright til 2032 (50 years pma). As South Africa has no freedom-of-panorama exception, image needs to be deleted now, but can be undeleted in 2033. -- Túrelio (talk) 09:21, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Same problem with:

Files uploaded by Dafzzz (talk · contribs)[edit]

YouTube license washing, the YT user is not the author of the portraits.

Yann (talk) 09:30, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Dafzzz (talk · contribs)[edit]

User blocked for copyvios, bogus license.

Yann (talk) 09:32, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Կիլիկիա նավի ուղևորության ժամանակացույց.png[edit]

Potential copyvio: bottom right states "© Author of the map: G. Beglarian", which does not look at all like the uploader's username (Anahit Aghoyan), so the claim of "own work" is likely false. HyperGaruda (talk) 09:35, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:JeugdvanTegenwoordigSterrenstof.png[edit]

Just text, OOS, No encyclopedic use CoffeeEngineer (talk) 09:35, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Marcel Mauss 3.jpg[edit]

No evidence the work was released under CC0 licence. The photograph was taken from a commercial encyclopedia. No evident connection between uploader and copyright holder. Bujo (talk) 09:55, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Drawn map of William Island.jpg[edit]

Out of scope (Artwork without obvious educational use, including non-educational artwork uploaded to showcase the artist's skills): map of a fantasy island, probably meant for use at en:User:JohnCook02/sandbox, describing said made-up island (made up because there is nothing but ocean between Rapa Iti and Antarctica). HyperGaruda (talk) 10:19, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ju Jingyi in 2024.jpg[edit]

It is a reposted image (weibo watermark on bottom right corner) taken from a fan image (original watermark on top left hand corner). Original copyriight holder is Sugar·Kiku on weibo (https://weibo.com/5944420108/O7ftyxkra) NoCringe (talk) 10:22, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Per COM:NETCOPYVIO. 0x0a (talk) 02:48, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Véronique Laveau en 2023.jpg[edit]

The person photographed messaged me stating that she wanted the picture removed. AulusPersiusFlaccus (talk) 18:43, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

evidence of your statement? --Zenwort (talk) 20:23, 3 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Why does she want to remove the photo? What is her interest in not wanting her photo being on Commons? It is a good and decent photo, she is not depicted in a compromising position and she has an occupation (cineast and filmmaker) that goes along with some publicity, she is not anonymous. What does Canadian law say about this matter? JopkeB (talk) 04:43, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep in use. --Zenwort (talk) 20:23, 3 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: COM:INUSE; if she offers a freely licensed picture of herself that she would like better, then we can talk about courtesy deletion. —holly {chat} 21:09, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Véronique Laveau en 2023.jpg[edit]

The person shown on the picture, Véronique Laveau, asked me to remove the picture from wikimedia. She is not ok anymore with having a public picture of herself AulusPersiusFlaccus (talk) 10:28, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Véronique Laveau en 2023.jpg[edit]

The user/autor of the picture asked for deletion on wiki commons. The subject of the picture also ask for deletion. Both agree for deletion of the picture. Lonichi091423 (talk) 11:17, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:StKataev.png[edit]

Not own work, but Copyvio, screenshot of a Web Map Service. hm, Yandex maps? Enyavar (talk) 11:46, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by SnowKang (talk · contribs)[edit]

Possibly copyright violation. Source video is YouTube CC-BY, but the original video has ajunews blur.

Syunsyunminmin (talk) 12:02, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Manarhist (talk · contribs)[edit]

File:Leila Tael.jpg is from Facebook. Other image is also thumbnail-like and unllike that own work

Estopedist1 (talk) 12:48, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Lorry2000 (talk · contribs)[edit]

Out of scope, the person is not notable.

XenonX3 (talk) 13:13, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Arefjlyr (talk · contribs)[edit]

Used for self promo on multiple wikis

--Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 13:15, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:LL-Q188 (deu)-Michael Schönitzer (WMDE)-Weiden in der Oberpfalz.wav[edit]

Contains a blooper. 2003:CB:3747:438F:8F1B:B963:2532:C56A 13:21, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion request is from me (accidentally not logged-in), the author of the file. Michael F. Schönitzer 13:22, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment COM:INUSE. --Rosenzweig τ 21:40, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Flag of Austr.svg[edit]

Duplicate of File:Flag of Australia (converted).svg. Fry1989 eh? 13:38, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Skopelos at night-2024.jpg[edit]

poor quality Xocolatl (talk) 13:56, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files in Category:Donald Trump in July 2022[edit]

Bogus {{PD-CQ Roll Call}} claim. PD-CQ Roll Call applies only to images in a specific collection (per the Library of Congress, "The Economist Group dedicated to the public all rights it held for the photographs in this collection upon its donation to the Library" (underline added) and per the template itself "This work is from the Congressional Quarterly or Roll Call portion of the CQ Roll Call photograph collection at the Library of Congress." (underline added)) This image is not part of that collection and, indeed, is tellingly sourced to Getty (not the LoC) where it is indicated to be rights managed.

Эlcobbola talk 14:11, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete It seems the Roll Call collection includes a certain list of photographers, but that does not imply that everything they ever shot is included. Also, isn't the Roll Call collection all pre-2000? 173.89.213.12 12:44, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete per nom. I'll copy some of what I have at Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Born Isopod (which is about the same claim): "Permission section for many of the images state that the photographers are "recognized on the list of public domain CQ authors", but as I see it, they only apply to the work that is hosted in the collection, not for any future photographs taken by them." reppoptalk 15:53, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Haumea brilla con hielo cristalino.jpg[edit]

The image doesn't come with a valid free license, because SINC adds additional license terms that are not compatible with CC. This has been established at Commons:Deletion requests/File:EightTNOs.png and Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Haumea SINC files. This applies to all images that have been added to Category:Haumea SINC files since the files in that category have last been removed. Relevant discussion can also be found at User_talk:Antonsusi#The_license_of_File:Haumea_y_sus_lunas.png. The legal owner of the image (SINC, or Pedro Lacerda personally) is unclear, and we should err on the safe side. As far as I can tell, since the previous deletion discussions, the Haumea image has been removed from all other relevant derivative images on Commons, so the deletion should have minimal impact. Renerpho (talk) 14:37, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The other images affected are:
Renerpho (talk) 14:39, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bresci monument[edit]

This monument was erected c. 1990 per w:en:Gaetano Bresci and Italy does not have freedom of panorama.

czar 14:51, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This work does not reach the level of originality necessary to trigger copyright protection: it is simply a freshly carved block of marble on the sides. The sculptor, in fact, died shortly after beginning to carve it (which is why the marble block was dedicated to the deceased sculptor, as stated at the base). Furthermore, even if it were a creative work, the economic rights would belong to the commissioner, and the commissioners are the anarchists of Carrara, who, not recognizing the state law, release their works into the public domain. 79.32.62.89 09:30, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The design is simple but it is more than a block of marble. Why would the creative rights belong to anyone but the creator (life + 70 p.m.a. in Italy) especially without further proof of rights assignment? czar 13:50, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sanjo.JPG[edit]

The text suggests that the explanation board is no older than 1967 (昭和四十二年 = 42nd year of the Showa era); text is not yet in PD, thus possible infringement of literary copyright. Yasu (talk) 14:56, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files in Category:US National Archives series: Sanitized Version of Project Blue Book Case Files on Sightings of Unidentified Flying Objects, 1947 - 1969[edit]

Redundant: These 40 files of UFO sighting reports are part of a larger collection, which consists of ~10,600 such reports.

All those 10000 reports have already been uploaded to subcategories of Category:Project Blue Book - therefore, these 40 randomly chosen reports out of 10000, which have been uploaded by another bulk upload, are redundant and out of scope.

TheImaCow (talk) 14:59, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files in Category:Incident Number 48 in Wilmington, Ohio[edit]

Duplicate of File:Project Blue Book report - 1948-01-9669786-Wilmington-Ohio-48-.pdf, no reason to use individual page JPGs, PDF version is sufficient.

TheImaCow (talk) 15:04, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Carlillasa.jpg[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons:What Commons is not#Wikimedia Commons is not your personal free web host. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:22, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Eugene.I I uploaded that picture because I was a member of the WMF's Latin American Funds Commitee from 2021 to 2023, as you can see here: https://diff.wikimedia.org/2022/09/16/meet-the-latin-america-and-the-caribbean-regional-funding-committee/. They asked me to upload it. Carlillasa (talk) 21:56, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Student in chair in shared university garden.jpg[edit]

random person portrait, out of COM:SCOPE Mateus2019 (talk) 16:03, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Spoonbridge and Cherry.jpg[edit]

This sculpture is in the United States. According to an article on the English Wikipedia, the sculpture was made in 1988. Freedom of Panorama in the United States only applies to buildings. I suggest that this file be deleted. --Rockfang (talk) 06:13, 22 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted. High usage, saddens me. ZooFari 00:39, 29 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Spoonbridge and Cherry.jpg[edit]

1988 sculpture in Minneapolis, MN, US, no FOP in USA unfortunately. Bobamnertiopsis (talk) 15:45, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Closed as Kept per IronGargoyle. (May wish to file undeletion request for discussion) -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 03:51, 5 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Spoonbridge and Cherry.jpg[edit]

Copyrighted public art in the United States that does not grant Freedom of Panorama for copyrighted sculptures and monuments. See also Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Spoonbridge and Cherry and the discussion at this failed undeletion request. Bobamnertiopsis (talk) 17:02, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:STS-112 launch.ogv[edit]

The video will not play when it is clicked on. Tigerdude9 (talk) 17:08, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:SUTERMEISTER H M. Summa Iniuria (cover).jpg[edit]

scaled-down duplicate of https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Grundbegriffe_der_Psychologie_von_heute.pdf 178.197.234.235 21:17, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:44, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Restored per [3]. --Rosenzweig τ 14:25, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:SUTERMEISTER H M. Summa Iniuria (cover).jpg[edit]

Higher resolution duplicate File:Summa Iniuria.jpg 194.11.202.158 17:24, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Premio Fuente de Castalia (2018) logotipo.png[edit]

text is simple but background of text may be copyrighted. Grandmaster Huon (talk) 17:31, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Este logotipo realmente es solo el texto y el rectángulo. El fondo no es parte del logotipo, como se puede comprobar en la fotografía de donde está tomado ( https://www.artezblai.com/maria-ruiz-premio-fuente-de-castalia-del-18-festival-clasicos-en-alcala/ ). He eliminado el fondo para evitar problemas, dejando sólo el texto y el rectángulo. Raimundo Pastor (talk) 20:33, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Closed discussions from Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Cloud Gate
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Cloud Gate

No COM:FOP in the US for sculptures.

russavia (talk) 09:52, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete. -> Commons:FOP#United_States--Wdwd (talk) 11:04, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete, especially Cloud Sphere1.jpg was deleted before (see Commons:Deletion requests/Image:Cloud Sphere.jpg), transferred to de.wikipedia (with a note "deleted on commons") but nevertheless transferred back to here... --Isderion (talk) 11:52, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete. I can't find his email or other way to contact the sculptor or we could ask him if he wants to join my fledgling project.--Canoe1967 (talk) 22:20, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I found an email for one of his galleries and asked if they would contact him to release images of some or all of his works.--Canoe1967 (talk) 16:10, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I received a quick reply that my email will be forwarded to the sculptor. Hopefully he will provide OTRS. --Canoe1967 (talk) 18:24, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
that would be really cool --Isderion (talk) 19:30, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Without OTRS permission after 9 days Alan (talk) 11:25, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Cloud Gate 2

No COM:FOP in the US for sculptures.

russavia (talk) 16:25, 19 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted -FASTILY 07:40, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Cloud Gate 3

As per this decision.

-- Tuválkin ✉ 09:09, 13 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

--TonyTheTiger (talk) 05:25, 16 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
TonyTheTiger, copyright law is aggressive, and shark lawyers of famous architects and powerful city halls are aggressive even more. These deletion requests are defensive. Since some images are used in some articles of English Wikipedia, a good case could be made for their retention as fair use, according to the rules of the English Wikipedia; ditto, m.m., for any other Wikipedia or Wikimedia projected that is contaminated with a fair use clause. (But these images would still have to be deleted in Commons.) -- Tuválkin ✉ 11:09, 16 August 2014 (UTC) (revised: -- Tuválkin ✉ 01:35, 18 August 2014 (UTC))[reply]
I think the principle of Commons:De Minimis applies to File:2005-10-13 2880x1920 chicago above millennium park.jpg and File:The Bean and McCormick Tribune Plaza.jpg. I think the FAC for CLoud Gate on en addressed the reflection picture. Ruhrfisch (talk) 14:10, 16 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I  agree with Elcobbola above and therefore  withdraw the nomination for those images. -- Tuválkin ✉ 01:35, 18 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted some, kept some. For File:The Bean and McCormick Tribune Plaza.jpg, since it's being used to illustrate the plaza, it would be a better to crop out The Bean rather than deleting the whole thing. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 07:11, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Cloud Gate 4

Obviously, it's time for another Cloud Gate DR. I've tried to be as generous as I felt was reasonable about only including the images that violate the copyright in this sculpture.

For context, en:Cloud Gate is a public sculpture erected in 2006 in McCormick Park in Chicago. It is not only copyrighted (with no FOP for sculpture in the US), but the City of Chicago has licensed it from the artist, and requires permission for any commercial use of photographs (which is incompatible with Commons).

I've tried to weed out the ones where either the Bean is a de minimis aspect of an image of the park itself, or where it's shape is not visible and it's only 'a mirrored object'. Most of these are simply not okay.

Reventtalk 12:21, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • I have sought permission via email from the author (Anish Kapoor) to retain my photo, as there is no FoP for sculpture in the US. The attempt to remove nearly all remaining depictions of Cloud Gate is sudden and troubling. -- adsitm 16:48, 15 Dec 2016 (UTC)
I'm sorry that you find this 'sudden and troubling', but I suggest looking at the history of this DR page. As you will see, nearly all images of this work have been deleted on a periodic basis for half a decade now (previously, 'all' images were deleted, but those DRs were filed for the 'category' instead of just files in it, and are thus not here). That copyvio images are sent to DR is nothing novel, this is just something that most people don't realize is copyrighted and like to photograph, to the extent that photography of it is discussed in it's article. Reventtalk 03:38, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:57, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Cloud Gate 5

Regular cleaning of this category of new uploads of images that depict too much of this copyrighted work of art.

- Reventtalk 22:04, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:22, 3 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Cloud Gate 6

No COM:FOP for sculpture in the US, as per Commons:Deletion requests/Category:Cloud Gate and the above.

  — Jeff G. ツ 04:07, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

In File:The Bean and McCormick Tribune Plaza.jpg, the bean is de minimis, image hardly even has the bean in the photo. The sculpture is not even visible in File:Tented cloud gate.jpg. File:Cloud gate construction.jpg is simply a photo of a construction site, the sculpture had yet to be erected. It is inarguably de minimis in File:2005-10-13 2880x1920 chicago above millennium park.jpg. It is also minimus in File:Millennium park,chicago.JPG. It is hardly even visible in File:Millenium Park (7391867314).jpg. Seems to be de minimus in File:Bean from Kemper Tower (14958184744).jpg. Also, hardly the primary focal point of the image File:Chicago Bean.jpg. Not at all included in the image File:Cloud gate, Chicago skyline.jpg, as far as I can tell (not sure why it is in this category). Certainly not included in the image File:2008TIBE Day5 Hall1 ThemeSquare On the Road with Cloud Gate.jpg (should not be in this category at all). Not the primary focal point of the image File:The Bean - Millennium Park - panoramio.jpg.

Some of these certainly should be spared, and the category itself should not be deleted. SecretName101 (talk) 04:13, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@SecretName101: Considering File:Cloud gate construction.jpg, in this photo, I see a cross section of what looks like one of the sculptor's ribs, with cross-supports. This looks to me like derivative work of the sculptor's copyrighted mechanical drawings.   — Jeff G. ツ 01:20, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
However, this segment essentially (from what is visible in this image) takes a spoke-and-wheel shape, a physical form that has existed since early human history. It would be hard to argue that a photograph of this structural element violates his unique intellectual property. SecretName101 (talk) 01:45, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The deletion of File:2005-10-13 2880x1920 chicago above millennium park.jpg would be particularly catastrophic, and utterly unnecessary. This is a valuable (and widely-used) image, in which the sculpture inarguably is de minimus. SecretName101 (talk) 04:28, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • I've got to disagree with this. If the image were just a distorted picture of the public space, it should be deleted as out of scope. The value of the image is that it's not just the space but a reflection in the sculpture. — Rhododendrites talk |  22:26, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I agree with Rhododendrites on this one. That one is indefensible, as its sole focus is the reflection on the sculpture. SecretName101 (talk) 01:31, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • I would like to add another image to this discussion. It was not in the category at the time of the nomination (I have since added it), but it does feature the sculpture. File:ParkGrill.jpg. Should this be deleted or re-cropped (with the original version deleted) to remove the Bean, or is the image fine as is. Thoughts??? SecretName101 (talk) 19:05, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: most per nom. 'kept some due to de minimis or similar. --JuTa 09:47, 13 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Cloud Gate 7

still copyrighted, noting here so that it may be undeleted someday

Jon Kolbert (talk) 05:54, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: speedily deleted as copyvios. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 05:54, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Cloud Gate 8

Copyrighted work, no freedom of panorama for public art in the US.

— Rhododendrites talk |  16:43, 26 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:25, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Cloud Gate 9

No FOP for sculpture in the US, and per Commons:Deletion requests/Category:Cloud Gate and the above.

  — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 16:35, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep File:The Bean Chicago United States Travel Photography (112096191).jpeg is just a reflection on a surface, I don't see anything copyrightable there. This photograph also shows such a simple and usual object: File:The Bean (30263803).jpeg that I have difficulty understanding why it would be above the threshold of originality. Was there some case on court about it, or something similar?-- Darwin Ahoy! 22:22, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@DarwIn: Please see COM:FOP US and Commons:Public art and copyrights in the US.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 22:36, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Jeff G.: I know, but there is also TOO. You can't simply declare something is art and expect protection. Something that looks like a mere ellipse in a reflective material look way below the TOO for the US. But for File:The Bean Chicago United States Travel Photography (112096191).jpeg it's obviously  Keep, there's nothing copyrightable there, at least that I can see.-- Darwin Ahoy! 01:14, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete all as blatant derivative work copyvios. DarwIn TOO is no longer relevant if this sculpture by its copyright-conscious artist w:Anish Kapoor has caused hot water to several users in the past, most notably NRA (National Rifle Association) when they included an image of this artwork in their video. See [4], [5], and [6], which I used as sources for another entry under "United States" in w:Freedom of panorama enwiki article and its Tagalog Wikipedia translation. All non-trivial images of this sculpture must be removed (US de minimis is much sharper, see COM:DM United States, it uses "triviality" concept than "incidental"). JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 02:30, 2 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@JWilz12345: TOO does matter here; I could for example extract one of the squiggly lines from Donald Duck's head and it would suddenly fall below TOO. So just because the work as a whole is above TOO, doesn't mean that a small portion of the work is necessarily also above TOO. For images like File:The Bean Chicago United States Travel Photography (112096191).jpeg, the shape of the outline is almost certainly below TOO. So the artist here has essentially created an algorithm to transform the surrounding Chicago skyline, in the form of a mirror reflection. The question becomes: Does the creator of this algorithm have enough creative input to have a copyright stake on its output, which was chosen by the photographer? -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:39, 14 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@King of Hearts: it seems we are entering another part of the gray area of the no U.S. freedom of panorama for any protected public artworks concept. The sculpture may be a simple kidney-shaped bean that is "ordinary" in the eyes of most people, though it has created headaches for one end-user (National Rifle Association). Kapoor himself is a noted litigous artist, and one attorney asserts that only the City of Chicago has the right to commercially use images of this copyrighted work. Perhaps COM:Project scope/Precautionary principle may roll in? JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 04:48, 14 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Part of PCP is that the likelihood of the creator suing should not be taken into account in these decisions. That's why we kept the monkey selfie. In some of these closeups, I just don't see anything copyrightable. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:00, 14 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Looks like the U.S. Copyright Office considers it creative enough to be copyrighted. [7] Ixfd64 (talk) 17:44, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Some of them can be cropped or have the work of art blurred out of them, and still be useful. I deleted the obvious cases, though.-- Darwin Ahoy! 16:39, 3 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Cloud Gate 10

Another set of derivative work copyvios: of a sculpture protected by copyright by its living artist w:Anish Kapoor. Previously these were categorized under Category:Millennium Park so they got undetected. See [8] and [9] for the basis of nomination for these perhaps last non-trivial images of the copyrighted sculpture. There is no freedom of panorama for all copyrighted artworks in the United States, see COM:FOP US. US de minimis is sharper (COM:DM United States), as it uses "triviality" concept instead of "incidental".

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 02:43, 2 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete all per COM:FOP US, Commons:Deletion requests/Category:Cloud Gate, and the above.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 10:12, 2 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Cloud Gate 11

Still another set of derivative work copyright violations. No FOP of any sort for copyrighted public works in the U.S. except architecture, and sculptor Anish Kapoor does not allow free culture (commercial) reuses of visual appearances of "his" artwork! See also above nominations. American de minimis uses triviality concept instead of incidental/accessory concept like those in Europe or much of Asia.

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 05:53, 14 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment: Has the sculpture actually been determined to meet the threshold of originality? I know Kapoor filed for copyright registration, but it's not clear if the registration was granted. Ixfd64 (talk) 17:14, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Looks like it is copyrighted. [10] Ixfd64 (talk) 17:38, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete all per COM:FOP US, Commons:Deletion requests/Category:Cloud Gate, and the above.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 11:27, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Cleaned up the nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:24, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Cloud Gate 12

There is no freedom of panorama for copyrighted public art in the United States, and none of the nominated images show the sculpture in a trivial manner (U.S. de minimis is too narrower than European ones). This sculpture has been the subject of a copyright lawsuit by its living sculptor, Anish Kapoor, against a commercial user, NRA. See also the following resources regarding Kapoor's lawsuit against NRA: Artnet, The Guardian, and BBC.

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 09:41, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete all per COM:FOP US, Commons:Deletion requests/Category:Cloud Gate, and the above.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 11:35, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete all per Jeff G. File:The Bean Reflecting (pingnews) (222198126).jpg may be considered de minimis as it only shows a reflective surface, but the quality of the image is so poor that it is not worth keeping IMO. Ixfd64 (talk) 18:11, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted all but one per DM. — Racconish 💬 15:04, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Files in Category:Cloud Gate 13[edit]

Several new files have been added that populate this category. I'm also tagging several older files that haven't been discussed before to gather consensus on whether they should be kept on de minimis grounds.

At issue is that these files depict Cloud Gate, a copyrighted sculpture permanently installed in the US where there is no freedom of panorama for public art. Quoting an earlier successful deletion request, "this sculpture has been the subject of a copyright lawsuit by its living sculptor, Anish Kapoor, against a commercial user, NRA. See also the following resources regarding Kapoor's lawsuit against NRA: Artnet, The Guardian, and BBC." IMO the litigousness of the copyright holder should not affect our consistent application of standards around copyright law but it's been brought up before so I suppose it's worth bringing up again.

First, there is one photo that is entirely of Cloud Gate for which a de minimis rationale would not apply:

Second, there are several photos in which Cloud Gate appears at a distince within the larger context of the setting. A de minimis arguement could be made for these, and we have kept two files in the past (File:2005-10-13 2880x1920 chicago above millennium park.jpg and File:Millennium park,chicago.JPG) on these grounds. However, in both of those cases Cloud Gate is a significantly smaller and less focal portion of the image.

Third, several photos depict a portion of Cloud Gate up close, often with the inclusion of other elements in the foreground or background. Do these files qualify as de minimis inclusion of the copyrighted work? Consider this file which had most of Cloud Gate coropped out to focus on the background elements instead.

Finally, one photo is simply a selfie taken by way of the mirrored surface of Cloud Gate. This might be argued to be entirely a photo of the sculpture, or to be a completely de minimis usage. In either case, I'm nominating it here for consensus:

Any of these files that aren't deleted (or that are partially cropped and saved) can be added to Category:Incidental views of the Cloud Gate. Thanks! Bobamnertiopsis (talk) 17:37, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


I disagree that the statue is a "clear focal point" of either File:Chicago skyscrapers on a rainy night (52036718532).jpg or File:Bilde(62) (801715).jpg. I would keep both of those. SecretName101 (talk) 19:48, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep File:Bean Selfie.jpg - here is a reflective surface. Reflections are not subject to copyright. The artist did not invent a mirrored surface. The copyright object cannot be distinguished as different from a mirror by this close up image. -- Ooligan (talk) 13:34, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Toyota Sprinter Trueno (E80) in Initial D.jpg[edit]

Derivative work of copyrighted photo. Grandmaster Huon (talk) 17:49, 21 April 2024 (UTC) file[reply]

Is file:藤原豆腐店２ - panoramio.jpg de minimis or should it also be nommed? Arlo James Barnes 17:52, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Had already nominated that. Grandmaster Huon (talk) 02:08, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:藤原豆腐店２ - panoramio.jpg[edit]

Derivative work of potentially copyrighted photos that are too significant to be de minimis. Grandmaster Huon (talk) 17:50, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Logo de There Is No Game Wrong Dimension.png[edit]

Borderline TOO case. Grandmaster Huon (talk) 17:55, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:WLM14ES - Puerta de Alcalá - Hugo Díaz-Regañón.jpg[edit]

Sorry, I fail to see educational value. Out of project scope? Taivo (talk) 18:21, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Request speedy delete. As (massive) uploader, I don't see the scope in our project. Please, don't blame me for this upload, it was already 10 years ago, and my mission was only upload it, not make the filtering for WLM contest. Thanks. Superzerocool (talk) 18:50, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Matzot1.png[edit]

not "own work", but "own copied" product graphic, see de:Diskussion:Seder#Sedertisch H7 (talk) 18:26, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pac-Man.jpg[edit]

Poster too big to be de minimis. Grandmaster Huon (talk) 18:44, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files found with Special:Search/Comecocos.jpg[edit]

Derivative work of copyrighted plush and game.

Grandmaster Huon (talk) 18:47, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pac-Man Memorabilia.jpg[edit]

Derivative work of copyrighted plush toys, board games and pac-man video game. Grandmaster Huon (talk) 18:47, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Taiyo Yuden Solfille logo.png[edit]

Laurel wreath maybe above TOO. Grandmaster Huon (talk) 18:56, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Authen's cat but jolly hashtag awesome.jpg[edit]

Out of scope, personal file Seawolf35 (talk) 19:00, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Fanacsp (talk · contribs)[edit]

above TOO france.

Grandmaster Huon (talk) 19:04, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rocket City Trash Pandas logo.png[edit]

tail may be above TOO. Grandmaster Huon (talk) 19:09, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Logo san diego clippers 1982 bis 1984.png[edit]

Basketball depiction borderline TOO. Grandmaster Huon (talk) 19:10, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:1 demarcus cousins 2019 (cropped) (cropped).jpg[edit]

Derivative work of copyrighted logo. Grandmaster Huon (talk) 19:11, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:San diego clippers logo 1982-84.jpg[edit]

Per this. Grandmaster Huon (talk) 19:11, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Schlagzeilen-Logo 2012.png[edit]

Chains may be above TOO DE. Grandmaster Huon (talk) 19:14, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pola Negri i polska reprezentacja olimpijska w hokeju na lodzie, 1932 r.jpg[edit]

No evidence provided that the "unknown author" died more tham 70 years ago. Ankry (talk) 20:02, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dobry wieczór, inny administrator poinformował mnie już o problemie. Chodzi o to, że popełniłem błąd przy uzupełnianiu formularza licencji.
Pytanie, czy jest szansa poprawić ten formularz, czy będę musiał ponownie wgrywać to zdjęcie? Alex-TrTr (talk) 20:15, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sonja Henie i Polska reprezentacja olimpijska w hokeju na lodzie, 1932 r.jpg[edit]

No evidence that the photographer died more than 70 years ago. Too new for PD-old-assumed. Ankry (talk) 20:04, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dobry wieczór, inny administrator poinformował mnie już o problemie. Chodzi o to, że popełniłem błąd przy uzupełnianiu formularza licencji.
Pytanie, czy jest szansa poprawić ten formularz, czy będę musiał ponownie wgrywać to zdjęcie? Alex-TrTr (talk) 20:14, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sweatergxd mugshot.jpg[edit]

Questionable provenance. Wikipedia notes at en:WP:SPORTSKEEDA that the source website used here is generally unreliable due to a consensus that there is little or no editorial oversight over the website's content, which is largely user-written; would need some confirmation that this was a genuine Florida police mugshot and not a photo from some other context. Uploader has run into copyright issues before with non-free pictures of streamers uploaded to Commons to be the lead image for enwiki articles like "Nerd"; this one was uploaded as the first, best, most representative photo for the "Mugshot" article. Belbury (talk) 20:19, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:VfB Fortuna Biesdorf Logo.png[edit]

This logo shouldn't be deleted. The text is simple, the footballs are simple and the bear is the not protected by copyright, because it's the bear from the coat of arms of Berlin. Welkend (talk) 20:24, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

public domain status of the bear is not inherited to its derivative works. Grandmaster Huon (talk) 16:51, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ben Schrader at launch of The Big Smoke, 2016.jpg[edit]

Requesting a courtesy deletion. The subject's wife has asked for this image, uploaded by the subject's sister 3 days ago, to be deleted as it is not a suitable representation of him. The subject's family is working on opening the licensing of a professional author headshot to use instead. This image is only being used on the subject's Wikidata item and Wikipedia article. Thank you. Avocadobabygirl (talk) 21:44, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep. The image is of fine quality and has clear consent (taken in public place by the sister of subject). The image also has scope value beyond the other image because it was taken at a book launch of the subject. IronGargoyle (talk) 11:59, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dzungar Khanate and Qing Empire ca. 1688.jpg[edit]

Not an own work. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 21:59, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kalmyk-torghut.jpg[edit]

Not an own work. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 22:00, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Geomuseo Monte Arci "Stefano Incani".jpg[edit]

ho un file migliore che può sostituirlo Nicothepowersonw (talk) 22:14, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gumbly or Graggle Simpson.jpg[edit]

I would argue "free-to-use; just remove the signature first" does not mean "Public Domain" in any legal way, so we should evaluate if it's appropriate to keep that image Sciking (talk) 22:40, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Հայ ձկնորսներ, մանրանկարչություն.jpg[edit]

Own work it's not. Is the book PD? 200.39.139.11 22:51, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Армянская Миниатюра.tif[edit]

Own work it's not, old or new book? 200.39.139.11 22:53, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:«Կիլիկիա» նավը Վենետիկում.jpg[edit]

21 years old file, own work? 200.39.139.11 22:55, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Deletion_requests/2024/04/21&oldid=876948412"