Commons:Deletion requests/2024/04/18

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
17 April 2024
19 April 2024
Deletion requests on 18 April 2024

April 18[edit]

File:Comunidad de Atzitzintla, Puebla.pdf[edit]

Out of scope: plain text. Para crear una pagina en Wikipedia, lee es:Ayuda:Tu primer artículo. Omphalographer (talk) 01:32, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Abhishek Anil Mishra.jpg .jpg[edit]

Another Abhishek 186.175.82.204 01:43, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dr. Mark T. Esper appears before the Senate Armed Services Committee for his confirmation hearing to become Secretary of Defense.webp[edit]

https://www.c-span.org/about/copyrightsAndLicensing/ states that recordings of committee hearings can only be used for non-commercial purposes. Pursuant to Commons:Licensing, the file should be deleted. Sdrqaz (talk) 03:02, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Makwangsoo.png[edit]

Although the video was released under a Creative Commons license, the collection of photos used within are not the work of eDaily. They can not be freely licensed without permission from the original photographer(s). ✗plicit 03:53, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Reynesocoeloceras.jpg[edit]

This file is from Jean-Louis et al. (2011). The link is here. No declaration is made that this document is licensed under a Creative Commons license or any other commercially available license. ノボホショコロトソ (talk) 03:57, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

supplement: See Fig. 8.--ノボホショコロトソ (talk) 04:06, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Chapter 2 XHTML CSS JavaScript - XHTML.pdf[edit]

Out of scope: plain text. Omphalographer (talk) 04:55, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Flying High (110101329).jpeg[edit]

Unidentifiable aircraft - not realistically useful for an educational purpose PeterWD (talk) 06:53, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You need to understand what is deletion on a wiki... -- Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton m 00:03, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by CroatiaElects (talk · contribs)[edit]

Photos from https://www.sabor.hr don't fall within PD-Croatia-exempt. Similar example of deleted photo from same source: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Davorko Vidovic portrait.jpeg

Smooth O (talk) 07:32, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I still don't get completely how these work, sorry. What do they fall under then? Sabor clearly doesn't have anything against it, source is indicated.
From sabor.hr:
Copyright protection
"Contents authored by the Croatian Parliament can be downloaded without special permission, with the source indicated, and publicly published without changing their original content."

Should they be uploaded through Wikipedia like the Davorko Vidović portrait? Or like Pedja_Grbin.jpg? It would be a shame to not have them. CroatiaElects (talk) 09:16, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Logo collecteam.jpg[edit]

Logo d'entreprise, non libre de droit, téléversé par erreur Lurk004 (talk) 09:18, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:The infant Simera.jpg[edit]

Out of scope: No realistic educational value. Very low resolution, blurry image of a baby sitting. Much better example of subject matter on Commons. Headlock0225 (talk) 09:21, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Yonug Simera.jpg[edit]

Out of scope: No realistic educational value. Very low resolution, blurry image of a man. Much better example of subject matter on Commons. Headlock0225 (talk) 09:23, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:20240314 Athens 253.jpg[edit]

The building in question was only built in 2016. As a result and since there's no FOP in Greece this photo should be deleted. 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 09:48, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


File:20240314 Athens 248.jpg[edit]

The building in question was only built in 2016. As a result and since there's no FOP in Greece this photo should be deleted. 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 09:48, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


File:20240314 Athens 241.jpg[edit]

The building in question was only built in 2016. As a result and since there's no FOP in Greece this photo should be deleted. 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 09:49, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


File:20240314 Athens 266.jpg[edit]

The building in question was only built in 2016. As a result and since there's no FOP in Greece this photo should be deleted. 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 09:50, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


File:20240314 Athens 258.jpg[edit]

The building in question was only built in 2016. As a result and since there's no FOP in Greece this photo should be deleted. 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 09:50, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Can Commons:De minimis apply? JopkeB (talk) 16:55, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


File:SNFCC Kanal und Gebäude.jpg[edit]

The building in question was only built in 2016. As a result and since there's no FOP in Greece this photo should be deleted. 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 09:52, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


File:Stavros Niarchos Foundation Cultural Center - 52035681022.jpg[edit]

The building in question was only built in 2016. As a result and since there's no FOP in Greece this photo should be deleted. 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 09:52, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


File:Scott Devours1.jpg[edit]

Low quality, unused Mewhen123 (talk) 10:03, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete This file is licenced under CC-BY-NC-ND licence, which is not for Commons. Michalg95 (talk) 08:34, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete originally licenced under cc-by-sa 2.0, then changed, however CC licenses are irrevocable. However this file is redundant to File:Roger Daltrey No Plan B Band Royal Albert Hall 2011 (Scott Devours).jpg. —Matrix(!) {user - talk? - uselesscontributions} 16:26, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Blurred Karada.jpg[edit]

Blurry and unused image, can be replaced by alternatives A1Cafel (talk) 11:13, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


File:Blurred Coloured Lights (2320218399).jpg[edit]

Blurry and unused image, unlikely to be useful A1Cafel (talk) 11:20, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


File:Altersdurchschnitt pro Jahr graphische Darstellung.gif[edit]

The first frame of the animation shows a GoogleMap --> CopyVio unless that frame can be deleted Enyavar (talk) 11:30, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Volodymyr VB (talk · contribs)[edit]

Obvious copivio by new user

Stolbovsky (talk) 19:32, 14 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, a series of obvious copyright violations: trophies, team pictures, etc. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:30, 15 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Volodymyr VB (talk · contribs)[edit]

The author of all these images is the hoaxer Volodymyr Banyas, who was indefinitely blocked in Ukrainian Wikipedia for creating dozens of hoax articles. These photos were also removed from the UPL website. With a high degree of probability they are also fake.

Mitte27 (talk) 11:39, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:20191116-Semmarit-@-Lahden-sibeliustalo-©-Ville-Huuri-@huuricreative-74-scaled.jpg[edit]

not own work per file title. VRT-permission from the creator/photographer is needed. Estopedist1 (talk) 11:46, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Riitta Piistari (talk · contribs)[edit]

not own work. VRT-permission from the creator/photographer is needed.

Estopedist1 (talk) 11:54, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bettina WitteVeen "5 Wounds," The Christa Project.jpg[edit]

Copyright violation. No Freedom of Panorama for 2D or 3D artworks in the United States Headlock0225 (talk) 12:00, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The licensing info was submitted to me by the artist Bettina Witteveen. Here's the info from her:
ImageTitle: Bettina_WitteVeen-5_Wounds-The_Christa_Project-St_John_the_Divine-Photo01_by_Jeffrey_Sturges
5 Wounds Installation by Bettina WitteVeen (01) by Jeffrey Sturges is licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0
HTML:

5 Wounds Installation by Bettina WitteVeen (01) by Jeffrey Sturges is licensed under <a href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/?ref=chooser-v1" target="_blank" rel="license noopener noreferrer" style="display:inline-block;">CC BY-SA 4.0<img style="height:22px!important;margin-left:3px;vertical-align:text-bottom;" src="https://mirrors.creativecommons.org/presskit/icons/cc.svg?ref=chooser-v1"><img style="height:22px!important;margin-left:3px;vertical-align:text-bottom;" src="https://mirrors.creativecommons.org/presskit/icons/by.svg?ref=chooser-v1"><img style="height:22px!important;margin-left:3px;vertical-align:text-bottom;" src="https://mirrors.creativecommons.org/presskit/icons/sa.svg?ref=chooser-v1"></a>

Sherryleehoward (talk) 14:00, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Sherryleehoward,
This looks like a solution but you will have to submit details via the Volunteer Response Team. Follow the following link for more details Commons:Volunteer Response Team
Headlock0225 (talk) 15:46, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


File:Bettina WitteVeen "When We Were Soldiers ... once and young".jpg[edit]

Copyright violation?? No Freedom of Panorama for art works in the United States. Headlock0225 (talk) 12:06, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The photo with licensing was submitted to me by the artist Bettina Witteveen. Here's the licensing info from her:
ImageTitle: Bettina_WitteVeen-When_We_Were_Soldiers_once_and_young-Crosses_Of_Suffering-BrooklynNavyYard
Crosses of Suffering from "When We Were Soldiers once and young" by Bettina WitteVeen is licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0
HTML:

Crosses of Suffering from "When We Were Soldiers once and young" by Bettina WitteVeen is licensed under <a href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/?ref=chooser-v1" target="_blank" rel="license noopener noreferrer" style="display:inline-block;">CC BY-SA 4.0<img style="height:22px!important;margin-left:3px;vertical-align:text-bottom;" src="https://mirrors.creativecommons.org/presskit/icons/cc.svg?ref=chooser-v1"><img style="height:22px!important;margin-left:3px;vertical-align:text-bottom;" src="https://mirrors.creativecommons.org/presskit/icons/by.svg?ref=chooser-v1"><img style="height:22px!important;margin-left:3px;vertical-align:text-bottom;" src="https://mirrors.creativecommons.org/presskit/icons/sa.svg?ref=chooser-v1"></a>

Sherryleehoward (talk) 13:58, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Sherryleehoward,
This looks like a solution but you will have to submit details via the Volunteer Response Team. Follow the following link for more details Commons:Volunteer Response Team Headlock0225 (talk) 15:10, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Phones of old times.jpg[edit]

Unused redirect OperationSakura6144 (talk) 12:12, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:G219-路线图.svg[edit]

This map includes Arunachal Pradesh within the borders of China, while it is actually a disputed territory at the very least, if not an inalienable state of India which has even been acknowledged by world leaders. Therefore, the map needs to either be revised, or taken down. 2406:7400:B9:A33E:10E3:1173:5D1B:45E7 12:12, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think this map matches any of the reasons in Commons:Deletion policy and Commons:Project scope. Neutral point of view is the policy in Wikipedia, but not in Wikimedia Commons. 瑞丽江的河水 (talk) 13:57, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This map matches the following reasons of the Commons Deletion Policy: "Self-promotion or vandalism/attack" part of the "Out of scope" Wikimedia commons policy. One of the clauses under this is "self promotion". There is also "vandalism" for "nationalistic" causes of the map - showing a disputed territory within the map as part of Chinese territory. 2406:7400:B9:A33E:291D:9ABC:2A6:203D 13:57, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Indeed. Wikimedia Commons intends to support all possible points of view so if you wish, you can upload another map, without Arunachal Pradesh as a part of China and convince Wikipedia Communities to use it. You can also change the file description (and maybe the filename - but keep it in Chinese) to show there the doubts you raised. Ankry (talk) 13:42, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Banshees heittokortit.jpg[edit]

copyrighted COM:PACKAGING. Permission is needed Estopedist1 (talk) 12:14, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Columbia River rapids ASMR - great for study and sleep - by JD Savanyu.webm[edit]

10 hours (1.5 Gb) of white noise, and unverified source of river audio: the Columbia River has few remaining exposed rapids, with most historic rapids submerged in reservoirs. Myasuda (talk) 14:58, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It's actually the White Salmon River, nearby the Columbia. Jarrod stanley (talk) 14:45, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Can you rename (i.e., "Move") the file so it reflects the actual content? Then I'd regard it as acceptable. Myasuda (talk) 02:16, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: No issues with copyright or scope, though it may be desirable to change the file name. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 20:54, 14 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Columbia River rapids ASMR - great for study and sleep - by JD Savanyu.webm[edit]

10 h video without any content, out of scope. Yann (talk) 12:28, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Could be re-uploaded as a true sound file and used to "illustrate" how river rapids sounds in an educational scope. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 16:04, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Seeing the uploader, we don't even know if they recorded this. If we don't know more (location, date and time of recording, etc.), it is useless. Yann (talk) 18:08, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Jarrod stanley (talk · contribs)[edit]

Videos without content, out of scope.

Extended content

Yann (talk) 12:34, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep – These should all be converted to audio. Considering them for the audio / as audio, they are some of the most useful audio files on WMC when excluding music (additionally I think they also are the only files on here I used so far). These are soundscapes, of which there are few and these are good-quality. If the uploader indeed created them it was very constructive and brought some quite valuable useful things to WMC. Prototyperspective (talk) 14:34, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Didn't notice they were looped. They should have been non-looped audio files. Maybe the user doesn't know how to convert webm to audio files. I think some info on that is missing at the page linked at Commons:Audio#Converting audio. Prototyperspective (talk) 00:02, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment I would like more information on the works, especially as if they're legitimate recordings of what they say they are, created by the user, they would have taken a lot of time and travel to gather. If they are, then reuploading them as audio files does seem reasonable. There doesn't seem much reason for them to stay as is, though.--Prosfilaes (talk) 15:36, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
They're looped audio recordings, created to maximize play time on Youtube. For example, File:Small Waterfall.webm is a loop about 6 minutes long, played about ten times; there's a distinctive "splooshing" noise around 0:30 which repeats around 6:30, 12:30, 18:30, etc. I haven't reviewed the other videos, but given their "perfect" lengths (2 hours, 6 hours, 10 hours) it's almost a certainty that they're loops as well. I wouldn't be surprised one bit if some of the claims of provenance (e.g. "Hudson River rapids") are inaccurate as well. Omphalographer (talk) 19:43, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yes. In addition, I don't see these "relaxing" audio/videos are in scope in any way. Yann (talk) 20:00, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Audio recordings of a river are just as in scope as photographs of the same river.--Prosfilaes (talk) 20:15, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not so sure.
  • First of all, mmost of these videos aren't even attributed to a specific body of water, let alone a location (e.g. "Waterfall Running Water Sound", "Bubbling Water Sound", "Asian Whirlpool", "River and Brown Noise", etc). An image with that vague of a description would probably be deleted; in fact, there's a couple groups of photos nominated today for that exact reason ("Low quality photos of generic landscapes").
  • Second, I'm not convinced that audio recordings are a useful way of illustrating rivers. The way an actual river sounds depends heavily on how much water is in it, where on the river you are, and how the recording is made. A microphone right by the water on a calm summer day will sound much different from a recording made from a distance during a spring flood, for example. And unlike a photo where these conditions can be ascertained from the image itself, an audio recording (and especially an edited recording, like these are) provides no context.
Omphalographer (talk) 21:10, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Are there any sounds nominated for that reason? I'm happy to delete mediocre examples of something we have many copies of, but recording reality in all of its various forms and mediums is useful, and we should have files letting us see, hear, smell and touch just about everything. Touch can partially be done with 3D recordings, but smell is currently out of reach; audio, on the other hand, is easily recorded and played back.--Prosfilaes (talk) 00:14, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete These files should be deleted. In theory the unlooped audio of many of these could be in scope, but there's too many questions of sourcing for me; I'm skeptical that they're free samples by the uploader and correctly described.--Prosfilaes (talk) 20:15, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 I agree with Prosfilaes and Jeff G.. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 20:21, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete per Jeff G. I've no objection to them as audio files, but blank video is pointless. Andy Dingley (talk) 20:41, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete and ask the user to upload non-looped audio only files with proper licensing evidence. --Mrb Rafi (talk) 05:10, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


File:Location marker for roads.jpg[edit]

Copyvio? This picture may be from https://arc-nohara.co.jp/products/traffic_other.html 運動会プロテインパワー (talk) 12:48, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Umberto Cascone (talk · contribs)[edit]

i'm sceptical of claims of original authorship of these files, because:

  1. no exif
  2. filenames of #2,3 suggest they were most likely downloaded from websites.
    1. File:Vittoria di Savoia Louis Vuitton 2019.png
    2. File:F a1a07de99a.jpg
    3. File:La-giornata-della-marina-a-civitavecchia-405042.660x368.jpg

RZuo (talk) 13:12, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Raúl Leoni 1965.jpg[edit]

Raúl Leoni (1905-1972) was president of Venezuela from 1964-1969. The Venezuelan rule for anonymous works is 60 years from publication, so if the date in the file name is correct, this is still under copyright in Venezuela. In any case, in order for it to be free of the URAA copyright, it would have to have been published before 1936, when the subject was only 31. That seems very unlikely -- he appears to be at least 20 years older than that.

The image from which this is extracted has a CC-0 license. There is no evidence why a Dutch museum would have the right to freely license a work from an anonymous Venezuelan photographer. And there is no basis at all for the CC-BY-SA license on the extracted image .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:14, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep We have no evidence of the nationality of the photographer, only the sitter. In the absence of that knowledge, I would accept the Dutch CC-0 license. For instance we have images of US presidents released under a CC license by the German National Archives. Presumably taken by German photographers, or first published in Germany. --RAN (talk) 21:16, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ataköy9.10.kısım www. truvaemlak.com - panoramio.jpg[edit]

Ads on the pictures title.(Truva emlak com) Lucky34C (talk) 13:16, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


File:Act+Fast Anti Choking Trainers.jpg[edit]

This file was initially tagged by Adeletron 3030 as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: G4|Re-upload of File:Act Fast Med Anti Choking Trainer.jpg Yann (talk) 13:39, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment The file is a re-upload of File:Act Fast Med Anti Choking Trainer.jpg so I thought it qualified as COM:SPEEDY#G4 but the uploader has submitted permissions to COM:VRT so I'm fine with removing the speedy tag. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 14:13, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Per https://www.actfastmed.com/terms-of-use/ the contents do meet the required standards. I hope this helps Serrwinner (talk) 17:02, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bisi Osundeko.jpg[edit]

This file was initially tagged by Smooth O as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: F10 Nice portrait. Yann (talk) 13:41, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mitrailleuse a 224 coups, cal 8.jpg[edit]

The photo is extremely grainy. LucasBrown (talk) 14:02, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Very rare weapon, photo made in a dark corner.Szilas (talk) 11:56, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sites sondés par Louis Jourdain.jpg[edit]

Not own work: No source for basemap provided. If this is GoogleMaps, it is a CopyVio (Com:PCP) Enyavar (talk) 14:49, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour, effectivement je me suis basé sur Google Maps sur lequel j'ai rajouté les sites sondés par mon arrière grand-père.
Que faut-il faire pour ce soit indiqué et donc acccepté
Merci 1943jcv (talk) 17:31, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Eelis,Rotso.jpg[edit]

unused file, too scarce info (no location etc.) to be useful for Commons Estopedist1 (talk) 14:50, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:JORDI FERRER BELTRAN, 23-06-1992.jpg[edit]

wrong date - copyright violation? Xocolatl (talk) 14:50, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This photograph was taken by Wikimedia Commons user Carolina Latorre Canet. She took this portrait on 06-23-1992. He has currently scanned the negative and done digital work. It is the author of the photo who has published her work on Wikimedia Commons and does not violate any copyright. In addition, she is currently the resident Wikipedian of the Jordi Ferrer-Beltran photographic archive, and with this photograph she provides a portrait of the photographer when he was young, improving the new Wikiproject of the Catalan Wikipedia.--Vicenç Salvador Torres Guerola (talk) 17:28, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep per Vicenç Salvador Torres Guerola.--TaronjaSatsuma (talk) 18:06, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Vicenç's explanation is correct.--Carolina Latorre Canet (talk) 18:25, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bischwiller pierre tombale église st nicolas hanhoffen5.jpg[edit]

This file was initially tagged by Didivo67 as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: F7

This is a .jpg file and it opens quickly and displays properly. There was no detailed reason given for this speedy deletion nomination.  Keep. Ooligan (talk) 14:53, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Territory of the Mullagori Tribe in Nangarhar Province, Afghanistan.jpg[edit]

GoogleMaps CopyVio Enyavar (talk) 14:54, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Drkells.jpg[edit]

copyright violation. see metadata Xocolatl (talk) 14:55, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:For The CLAIMANT'S-KNOWLEDGE of This LIVE-LIFE is with This CLAIMANT..jpg[edit]

unused file, no description. Seems like an hoax document? Estopedist1 (talk) 14:58, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep. This is actually a great example of a Category:Sovereign citizen movement document, something which we don't seem to have many other images of. I've categorized it thus; the file description could use some updates to put it into context. Omphalographer (talk) 19:24, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Map of the Hammersmith Sea.png[edit]

Out of scope: Personal fiction Enyavar (talk) 14:58, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rozuhause.jpg[edit]

no own work Dirk Lenke (talk) 15:00, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ausstellungmussbach.jpg[edit]

no own work Dirk Lenke (talk) 15:01, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Guiloviu (talk · contribs)[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logos.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:07, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:JeMoederHeetHenk.pdf[edit]

No educational value. Description makes no sense. It is the user's only contribution. Wouter (talk) 15:13, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Conversano Isabella (talk · contribs)[edit]

Unlikely to be own work. Small images, File:Favory Pallavicina.jpg even has a watermark. The uploader also has some PD files incorrectly labeled as own work.

Didym (talk) 15:23, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Affiches présidentielle française 2022.jpg[edit]

Commons:Derivative works from posters. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:24, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Stoitzner-Podhajsky.jpg[edit]

Siegfried Stoitzner died in 1976, so not PD until 2047. Obviously not own work. Didym (talk) 15:25, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Capture d’écran 2022-01-20 084613.png[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused screenshot of questionable notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:26, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mannequin manufacturing in Egypt.jpg[edit]

I have another account Doaa211 (talk) 15:32, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hönöys.jpg[edit]

unused, seems that out of scope Estopedist1 (talk) 15:33, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:بيت الكريتليه او متحف جاير أندرسون.jpg[edit]

I have another account Doaa211 (talk) 15:33, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:دير الانبا سمعان الخراز.jpg[edit]

I have another account Doaa211 (talk) 15:34, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:مسجد الرفاعي 11.jpg[edit]

I have another account Doaa211 (talk) 15:34, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Minecraft Legends Logo.jpg[edit]

Too complex, exceeds COM:TOO IagoQnsi (talk) 15:40, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


File:D5b86d7b3a04824008c6573d5e2353c3c011f804-500x281.png[edit]

Exceeds COM:TOO IagoQnsi (talk) 15:46, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Someone could remove the cobblestone texture and it would be fine I suppose. Sebbog13 (talk) 11:44, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support deletion now tho, that edit has not been made. Sebbog13 (talk) 11:44, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


File:Virginia 2nd Amendment Rally (2020 Jan) - 49416135411.jpg[edit]

The Reddit mascot is copyrighted Trade (talk) 16:07, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


File:Bishōjo game store in Akihabara 20090413.jpg[edit]

This file was initially tagged by Grandmaster Huon as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Derivative work of copyrighted material. Made up of entirely copyrighted material. Yann (talk) 16:21, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The heart of the matter is what the photo (as it was uploaded to Flickr by the author) fundamentally represents – it is a clear showcase of the interior of a store, focusing primarily on the entrance and not on any specific copyrighted elements, such as products or promotional materials. I would like to note that ~40% of the image was cropped to further emphasize the store's entrance (or aisle), with the shelves in the background, which inherently does not center on any identifiable products. This modification has de-emphasized the presence of larger posters and a TV screen, which could potentially distract from the main subject of the photo. The cropping has also inadvertently made smaller posters and portions of posters at the entrance more noticeable. However, these elements do not change the overall intent of the photo – highlighting the bishōjo game store's interior – and they do not somehow become the photo's subject. They are part of the store's character, yes, but they are not why the photo was taken or what it seeks to show.
The principle of {{De minimis}} exists for situations exactly like this – where the copyrighted material is not the main subject of the work and does not substantially affect the work's value. Even if these elements (temporary promotional materials) were replaced or removed, it would not alter the photo's theme. It is still about the store's overall interior. → This has already been demonstrated by the initial cropping: the removal of posters located above the entrance and a TV screen did not degrade the photo's value; instead, it reduced the number of copyright elements visible in the frame and better highlighted the photo's intended subject. And if the presence or absence of any identifiable product does not change the subject of the photo, these copyright elements are incidental and de minimis to the overall image. Santer (talk) 19:45, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Denis Flannery (1952, Sydney).jpg[edit]

Crop from (an identical earlier enwiki version of File:Queensland state rugby league team (1952, Sydney).jpg, which was deleted due to restored US copyright (Commons:Deletion requests/File:Queensland state rugby league team (1952, Sydney).jpg). Felix QW (talk) 16:22, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:A protester against the confirmation of U.S. Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh outside the Warren E. Burger Federal Building in St. Paul, Minnesota (29600407857).jpg[edit]

Derivative work of a copyrighted banner A1Cafel (talk) 16:23, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


File:Santos Iñurrieta Signature.jpg[edit]

This file was initially tagged by Docosong as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: previously deleted File:Firma santos.jpg Yann (talk) 16:23, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This seems too simple for a copyright, and it is in use. Yann (talk) 16:24, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Alişer and Zarife.jpg[edit]

This image is the property of the Kalan Müzik company and can be sued by the company for copyright infringement. You can find information about this on the following sources: 1. https://tr.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kalan_M%C3%BCzik 2. https://kalan.com/ 3. https://www.indyturk.com/node/281936/t%C3%BCrki%CC%87yeden-sesler/83-y%C4%B1l-%C3%B6nce-idam-edilen-seyit-r%C4 %B1za-hakk%C4%B1nda-birka%C3%A7-farkl%C4%B1-not MamBarzani (talk) 16:24, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


File:Ansicht Luftreiniger.jpg[edit]

This file was initially tagged by XenonX3 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Stolen from [1] or elsewhere and edited without permission by the original author. Yann (talk) 16:25, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:След.slad.png[edit]

This file was initially tagged by Drakosh as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: https://www.imdb.com/title/tt8803304/. COM:TOO? King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 16:29, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Signature of Frederick William Franz.gif[edit]

Possible copyright infringement. GIF-File at https://web.archive.org/web/20210127122305/http://www.strictlygenteel.co.uk/tracts/1958resolution.html (scroll down) in slightly smaller resolution. The commons uploader "Junkönig" can't prove that he was the owner of said website. Maybe he just stole the picture. As long as he can not prove it, I propose deleting it. 176.126.81.102 16:29, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I will not try to prove it, as it would require giving personal data about my past Strictly-Genteel Theocratic website, which I don't want to do. So, fine, delete it. I'll try to find a new one in some other publications later. Junkönig (talk) 22:30, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ehaam.logo.jpg[edit]

Logo of a music band, creative art, protected by copyright Huji (talk) 16:54, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lin ovoz aktirisasi.png[edit]

Unknown source, hard to believe the uploader own the image's copyright. Mısaka✨M1koto 17:14, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Capefarewell1 (talk · contribs)[edit]

Possible copyvio: The band is marked as the author; Different authors in metadata

CoffeeEngineer (talk) 17:23, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Copain LACLE.jpg[edit]

Possible copyvio: The model is marked as the author, F10, Watermark on the picture CoffeeEngineer (talk) 17:36, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Jonas Rannila.jpg[edit]

not own work. VRT-permission from the creator/photographer is needed. Estopedist1 (talk) 17:45, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Juozas Mazeika 2020.jpg[edit]

single uploading by this user, thumbnail-like, unlike that own work Estopedist1 (talk) 17:47, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Jurbarko katalikų bažnyčia.jpg[edit]

Old photo(s). Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. Estopedist1 (talk) 17:49, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Ka7ander33 (talk · contribs)[edit]

not own works. VRT-permission from the creator/photographer is needed.

Estopedist1 (talk) 17:50, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:DJScouseTrap.jpg[edit]

Possible copyvio: The model is marked as the author, F10 CoffeeEngineer (talk) 17:52, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tour de France 2020 Stage Profiles[edit]

See content in Category:Tour de France 2020 - Stage Profiles. This is not an original work, this is a creation by Le Tour de France (https://www.letour.fr/) and commonly used by other medias. Concerning previous years, profiles have been created by uploaders. --Gemini1980 (talk) 17:52, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:KUB 3019-1.jpg[edit]

not own work. VRT-permission from the creator/photographer is needed. Estopedist1 (talk) 18:04, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:DP .jpg[edit]

Possible copyvio: The uploader is not the author, as per metadata CoffeeEngineer (talk) 18:06, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:IceTre, Derek Luh, Mark Battles at the Kid Ink concert. 2014.jpg[edit]

Not relevant. Outdated. Bunkytrap34 (talk) 18:11, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Files uploaded by MyrhaanWarrior (talk · contribs)[edit]

Not own works, proper source, date, author, and license must be provided.

Yann (talk) 18:45, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete File:Garad Hirabu Goita Tedros.jpg It is a public domain image (artist died in 1899), but a better quality version without the watermark already is here, File:Schreyer Adolf The Warrier Oil On Canvas.jpg —Tcr25 (talk) 19:20, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment My pet peeve here are the falsified maps. A lot of the stuff is old enough to be in PD noW, I am just not comfortable with the wording (everything "must be provided") of the DR: If an uploader can be reasonably certain of PD, is it really necessary to exactly pinpoint the creation date to 1881 and name Fitzgerald Artist Johnson as the creator? Sure these are not own work, and the uploader should rectify that attribution in all images they want to keep. But let us be frank with the uploader: What Commons doesn't need are low-res scans where someone scribbled arrows on top with MS paint, and neither do we need self-made maps that provide no sources at all. Please stay away from images you find anywhere on the web, instead upload high-res scans of the whole work like you seemed able to provide (in the detail sections), don't smear crude arrows on the pictures, and if possible state the creation date and author to the best of your knowledge. This will avoid deletion in the future. --Enyavar (talk) 07:31, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:SJK171 3.png[edit]

Sadly unlikely to be own work. Only upload by this user. SDudley (talk) 19:03, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:000.Ottoman empire flag chronology.000.jpg[edit]

Incorrect Overvecht3301 (talk) 19:59, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


File:Blanc-Sablon-Sector of Lourdes de Blanc-Sablon-Overview in landscape-2013 (original from Magicpiano) (banner).jpg[edit]

Redundant. I created this with the crop tool but then realized its width was too small for a banner image and so i created a better one here. Brycehughes (talk) 20:11, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Dnalsrhdwn (talk · contribs)[edit]

Unused logos, out of scope

TheImaCow (talk) 20:22, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:LRG DSC07062.jpg[edit]

not own work. VRT-permission from the creator/photographer is needed. Estopedist1 (talk) 20:41, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:LA-171020-alvils-ronalds-bijons-f-35-2.jpg[edit]

not own work. By alvils-ronalds-bijons. VRT-permission from the creator/photographer is needed. Estopedist1 (talk) 20:43, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kramins Edgars 4.jpg[edit]

not own work. VRT-permission from the creator/photographer is needed. Estopedist1 (talk) 20:48, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Koti promo3.jpg[edit]

unused file. Seems like promotional Estopedist1 (talk) 20:51, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by JustinaMili (talk · contribs)[edit]

book covers. Permission from the illustrator is needed

Estopedist1 (talk) 20:53, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kevät 2020.jpg[edit]

unused file. Private image. Out of scope Estopedist1 (talk) 20:54, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Latvijas Nacionālo bruņoto spēku struktūra.jpg[edit]

unused file. Blocked user Estopedist1 (talk) 21:06, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:IMG-20220324-WA0012(5).jpg[edit]

Who is the photographer? The uploader? Don't think so... 200.39.139.20 21:37, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Erkkon paragliding.jpg[edit]

Possible copyvio: The model is marked as the author, F10 CoffeeEngineer (talk) 21:51, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cole Williams photographed by Bill Wadman in NYC, 2012.jpg[edit]

Possible copyvio: The uploader is not the author CoffeeEngineer (talk) 21:54, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Norm Ender Enderground.jpg[edit]

Copyrighted image ⲔⲖⲞⲢⲠⲒⲔⲢⲒⲚ (talk) 22:34, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Vilnius Feather 2012 - 8.JPG[edit]

bad quality KaiKemmann (talk) 22:39, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Logo Antiguo de Redbus.png[edit]

Solicitud de borrado solicitada por el autor Aroblesm (talk) 22:38, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment The courtesy deletion period ended years ago, so if this is in scope, it should be kept. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:26, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Nico Alexander und sein Vater.jpg[edit]

This file was initially tagged by 83.215.127.140 as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Urheberrechtsverletztung. Abgebildete Personen haben das Bild nicht freigegeben.  — billinghurst sDrewth 23:16, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Martin-Gruber-54-(c)-Helge-Bauer.jpg[edit]

possible copyvio (c) Helge Bauer M2k~dewiki (talk) 23:49, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files in Category:Interior of the Gasteig[edit]

There is no FoP for interior views in Germany. The buildings architects was a team around Eike Rollenhagen who is still alive and Germany has a standard of life + 70 years.

Paradise Chronicle (talk) 09:46, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Das wäre eine ganz neue Auslegung des deutschen Urheberrechtsgesetzes. Hier ist nach meiner Kenntnis die Abbildung von Architektur nicht urheberrechtsgeschützt. Und wenn man es dann, wie hier geschehen, auch noch als ein Verbot von Aufführungen in dem Gebäudesaal ausdehnen wollte, das wäre schon recht absurd. -- Kürschner (talk) 11:25, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ich möchte gerne hervorheben, dass Aufnahmen bei denen die Musiker absolut im Fokus sind wie etwa hier und keine nennenswerten architektonischen Erkennungsmerkmale zu sehen sind habe ich nicht zur Löschung nominiert. Auf den Files zu den Woody Allen Konzerten ist (für mich gar) kein Musiker auszumachen. Paradise Chronicle (talk) 12:46, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, this is technically true, but really NO ONE CARES or has ever cared in cases like this. Paradise Chronicle is on some kind of cruseade here and does not help anyone with it. --AndreasPraefcke (talk) 14:23, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Deletion_requests/2024/04/18&oldid=875973943"