Commons:Deletion requests/2024/04/16

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
15 April 2024
17 April 2024
Deletion requests on 16 April 2024

April 16[edit]

Files uploaded by ChSePe (talk · contribs)[edit]

These photos are very unlikely to be own work of the uploader, as claimed. If the uploader is actually the copyright owner of one or more of these works, I think they'll need to follow the procedures at COM:VRT.

—RP88 (talk) 00:31, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Biểu tình ngân hàng SCB trước phố đi bộ Nguyễn Huệ.jpg[edit]

The source is an advertisement and there are no related pictures shizhao (talk) 01:53, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

shizhao I had a mistake updating the YouTube link in the source. This is the source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mswSsxWlMdE&t=2m56s. Can you check and correct it for me?Khangdora2809 (talk) 05:34, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Apatin within Serbia.png[edit]

Bad quality, unused. Ђидо (talk) 01:59, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Тупые.jpg[edit]

alleged copyright infringement . https://dzen.ru/a/YFRyb1N5HgIbhelm - The photo belongs to Mikhail Grushin, there is no information about free licenses. Miikul (talk) 02:53, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Logo-instituto-aaron-swartz.png[edit]

The logo is on CC-BY-NC-SA Vitorperrut555 (talk) 02:56, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What's wrong with the logo?Fvr sm (talk) 16:49, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Files uploaded by Drminc (talk · contribs)[edit]

Out of scope

--Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 03:50, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Soulium (talk · contribs)[edit]

Out of scope

--Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 03:51, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:David Sinclair.jpg[edit]

Lacking photographer permissions and details. The photo predates the upload date of 2023, as shown in articles in 2021 or 2020. In addition, the upholder has been editing content on the David Sinclair English Wikipedia, suggesting this is individual is probably not the original photographer. A tag for deletion should be applied unless details and permissions of the original photographer are provided. Zenomonoz (talk) 09:17, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Raghava Lawrence.jpg[edit]

The image is way older than what the author has claimed. September 2014. The metadata shows that the image belongs to 'Ganesh' but the uploader's name is Manikandan. COM:EVID: In all cases the uploader must provide appropriate evidence to demonstrate either that the file is in the public domain or that the copyright owner has released it under a suitable licence. Jeraxmoira (talk) 05:07, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Vz. 98 2.0.jpg[edit]

This appears to be a photoshopped image (mortar rounds removed) of this image from https://kotadef.sk/projekty/minomety-2/?lang=en, which has a "Ⓒ 2024 KONŠTRUKTA-Defence, a.s." notice. MKFI (talk) 06:45, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Partiality.jpg[edit]

Screenshot per Metadata, dubious claim of own work A1Cafel (talk) 06:47, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

From the owner: I travelled to Utah to photograph this eclipse. This is my own work and I would never ever ever post someone else’s work and list it as my own. I have no idea why someone would think this is not my own work. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 50.215.56.25 (talk) 17:32, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Aronskelk2404.jpg[edit]

Privacy bc exact location was included I upload a new version without
Already uploaded version without EXIF-location name 'Aronskelk240415.jpg'
 Klaas `Z4␟` V:  10:19 16 April 2024 (CEST)

File:افضل شيف في الوطن العربي من بين 50 طاه محترف.jpg[edit]

Personal photo for non-Wikipedian. Out of scope Mohammdaon (talk) 07:33, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Upplands runinskrifter 628.png[edit]

The image depicts another runstone, Upplands runinskrifter 627, not 628. And it is also exactly the same image as the file uploaded under the name Upplands runinskrifter 627.png My mistake when I uploaded it. Matanb (talk) 07:34, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:سفير الطهاة الأردنيين في الوطن العربي.png[edit]

Personal photo for non-Wikipedian. Out of scope Mohammdaon (talk) 07:34, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:عبدالناصرعليوي العبيدي.png[edit]

Personal photo for non-Wikipedian. Out of scope Mohammdaon (talk) 07:36, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:علي صبيح احمد.jpg[edit]

Personal photo for non-Wikipedian. Out of scope Mohammdaon (talk) 07:36, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Chabilal Upadhyaya.jpg[edit]

Chabilal Upadhyaya died in 1980, meaning this is almost certainly not old enough for PD status. The "calender" (sic) it came from is probably copyrighted anyway. - Sumanuil. (talk to me) 07:38, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:ننىمنلاماؤغفنلاؤابهغن.jpg[edit]

non-Wikipedian. Out of scope Mohammdaon (talk) 07:44, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

اعتذر على اضافة الصورة صوتوا على حذفها، شكرا Yoousef.ali.2 (talk) 09:33, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:South Bank, Leeds.jpg[edit]

This picture looks like a montage. Indications are some shadows, reflections, and stilted postures. Buildings and structures on the ground cannot be found on aerial photographs. If this is just an architectural concept, it should be marked as such. Schlosser67 (talk) 08:10, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Scotti-highlands Travel Series with John Thompson's beautiful piano views 4th Player Jason M. C., Han.jpg[edit]

Blurred photo of unidentified trees. Only vague location given. No educational value. Malcolma (talk) 09:49, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Support - there does not seem to be any compensating significance to the photo. -- Schlosser67 (talk) 07:48, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Delta Macacu Mapa.jpg[edit]

GoogleMaps CopyVio Enyavar (talk) 09:58, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lipu tenpo nanpa kasi - mama.png[edit]

Copyright status is unclear. Source quoted points to a Web page on which there is a link to a PDF. Image appears in PDF document. No copyright statement on either the website or the PDF. No indication that on either website or PDF that this image is licensed as claimed. Headlock0225 (talk) 10:31, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Headlock0225: the source is the monthly zine lipu tenpo (their website), all of their issues and illustrations are licenced under CC BY-SA 4.0 as per their website and the back of issue (here, p. 14). I can confirm as I am a volunteer in the associtation. Juwan (talk) 10:39, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Please edit the File's Source a link to the image. Under permissions put a link to where the the image has been licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0. Headlock0225 (talk) 11:19, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
or use Commons:Volunteer Response Team Headlock0225 (talk) 11:21, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
the image was extracted manually from the PDF. another thing I found is that the website itself has the licence stated at "sona" (in English), I also contacted the website managers and they said that they will add disclaimers at the footers of the website. Juwan (talk) 11:26, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
changes made are more than satisfactory. I withdraw the nomination for deletion. Headlock0225 (talk) 12:07, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
lovely! I will make similar changes across other files. Juwan (talk) 12:37, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ma pona pi toki pona - banner (2023).png[edit]

Copyright status unclear. Source quoted does link to a Website containing the image but no indication that the image is licensed as claimed. Headlock0225 (talk) 10:36, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have contacted the original creator (kala pona Tonyu) and she gave me permition to upload it to Commons, how may I prove this to the wider community? as I really don't need so many deletion requests thrown my way ahah. Juwan (talk) 10:41, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Please contact Volunteer Response Team - for more information see Commons:Volunteer Response Team Headlock0225 (talk) 11:12, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
hello i am kala pona Tonyu and i am the creator of this banner! i am happy to have it here under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license Bucketfishy (talk) 11:21, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
thanks but you need to do this directly with the Commons:Volunteer Response Team Headlock0225 (talk) 12:09, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Computerbladen 2011.jpg[edit]

Derivative work of copyrighted magazine cover A1Cafel (talk) 11:42, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


File:Bonami beurs Schiedam.jpg[edit]

Per COM:PACKAGE A1Cafel (talk) 11:42, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


The packaging only contains technical descriptions of the contents and pictures of the computers. Falls below the threshold of originality and is used deminishedly. Someone Not Awful (talk) 18:52, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Nederland naar de finale 2010.jpg[edit]

Derivative work of a copyrighted newspaper A1Cafel (talk) 11:42, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


File:Orhan Çerkez.png[edit]

Telif hakkı belirsiz görsel Afakii (talk) 12:02, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cekmekoy-orhan-cerkez-logo.png[edit]

daha kalitelisini svg olduğundan farklı bir dosya olarak ekledim. Bu gereksiz olarak duracak. Hızlıca silinirse sevinirim. Afakii (talk) 12:23, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Beldanga railway station.jpg[edit]

Hi! I'm the author of this image and I want it to be deleted if it is possible. Reason - Wikimedia displays author's name and it is revealing my identity. Because of this privacy reason I want this particular file to be deleted. Thanks M66JX (talk) 13:15, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:A Vida Secreta da Sua Mente Abertura.png[edit]

Sem permissão indicada Cosmo Skerry (talk) 13:26, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:El Vellón.jpg[edit]

Cropped using a loss method Triplecaña (talk) 13:41, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. File created by me, cropping the original by wrong method which drastically reduces the quality. I assume my mistake and apologise.
Manolo (desfógate) 14:41, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


File:Ben Calvin Hary.jpg[edit]

I am the creator of the video this screenshot was taken from. I hold the rights to this. You CAN NOT take a screen shot from any of my videos and just put it under a CC license without my knowledge. Remove it please. 95.88.113.122 13:56, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

(ticket:2024041610007214) You licensed your video under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license (CC BY 3.0). This irrevocable license permits reuse, including derivative works (with or without your permission). — JJMC89 (T·C) 16:40, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Шералиев М МОЛОДОЙ.jpg[edit]

Person died in 1985, can not be own work of 2023. Original date? Author? Source? Copyright status? Drakosh (talk) 14:46, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sheraliev Murad.jpg[edit]

Person died in 1985, can not be own work of 2023. Original date? Author? Source? Copyright status? Drakosh (talk) 14:46, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Drakosh. Yes the person Sheraliev MuraT died in 1985. The User in Wikipedia Sheraliev MuraD (born 1972) is the grandchild of MuraT SHERALIEV MURAD. I am right now working with others Wikipedia users help to add source, copyright statues and etc. Please recall your deletion request SHERALIEV MURAD (talk) 15:05, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:20190825 225 amersfoort.jpg[edit]

Out of scope. It looks like a failed photo. How will this photo be reusable? There is a better one: File:20190825 224 amersfoort.jpg JopkeB (talk) 15:15, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unintentional, but sometimes God allows us to make good pictures without our knowledge :-) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jeanhousen (talk • contribs) 16:32, 16 April 2024‎ (UTC)[reply]

File:Limestone statue of Djehuti represented as a scribe.jpg[edit]

Suspect copyviol, looks scanned from an unspecified book, the given source seems unrelated to the picture. Lone-078 (talk) 15:16, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Caryn Navy.jpg[edit]

Appears to be a photograph of a photograph, possibly not Flickr user's work A1Cafel (talk) 16:19, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


 Keep, This DR is unwarranted and speculative. The photographer was a college professor. This file is in use at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caryn_Navy [1]. Thanks, -- Ooligan (talk) 14:42, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Caryn Navy (cropped).jpg[edit]

Appears to be a photograph of a photograph, possibly not Flickr user's work A1Cafel (talk) 16:19, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


 Keep, This DR is unwarranted and speculative. The photographer was a college professor. This file is in use at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caryn_Navy [2]. Thanks, -- Ooligan (talk) 14:43, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:HELINA (Dhruvastra).png[edit]

Incorrect image. InSameer (talk) 16:37, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sang 1.png[edit]

Not own work, taken from blog posting: see https://th.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E0%B8%AA%E0%B8%B1%E0%B8%87%E0%B8%82%E0%B9%8C_%E0%B8%9E%E0%B8%B1%E0%B8%98%E0%B9%82%E0%B8%99%E0%B8%97%E0%B8%B1%E0%B8%A2#/media/%E0%B9%84%E0%B8%9F%E0%B8%A5%E0%B9%8C:%E0%B8%AA%E0%B8%B1%E0%B8%87%E0%B8%82%E0%B9%8C_1.PNG C.Fred (talk) 17:21, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Atlanta1906.jpg[edit]

This file was initially tagged by Alachuckthebuck as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: No evidence of a free license at the claimed source.

Design is consistent with something from 1906. A few years away from PD-old-assumed. Author is possibly Juan José Enrich. Abzeronow (talk) 18:47, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Part of mass tag of uploads from nonfree source, missed this one. Sorry for the mess.
All the best - Chuck Talk 19:29, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Atlanta1921.webp[edit]

This file was initially tagged by Alachuckthebuck as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: No evidence of a free license at the claimed source.

Design is attested to be from 1921. Converting to DR since it could be public domain. Abzeronow (talk) 18:49, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep missed this one. A user uploaded a bunch of these, and I missed this one.
All the best - Chuck Talk 19:27, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:תמונת השמלה מהויקי האנגלית.png[edit]

Not in the commons מקף־עברי (talk) 18:57, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Liebesfrühling-im-Herbst-von-Rudolf-Lavant.ogg[edit]

Taken from [3]. While the text of the poem that is read is in the public domain, the audio recording is not, nor is it under a free license like the {{Cc-zero}} license claimed by the uploader. Rosenzweig τ 19:20, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by BFlamer99 (talk · contribs)[edit]

I'm not certain if this user is Cody Belles, so we need to review them to ensure that these colorizations are actually allowed on here. Also need to make sure there is proper tagging of the files in that case. One for the colorization and one for the underlying black and white image. There is just a lot of poor data associated with these images.

SDudley (talk) 19:22, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Şıxəliyeva Ərkinaz (talk · contribs)[edit]

Out of scope: plain text; poems written by the uploader.

Omphalographer (talk) 19:33, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hamburg - Kunsthalle Hamburg (7).jpg[edit]

copyright violation; contemporary artwork; no freedom of panorama. Martin Sg. (talk) 19:37, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files in Category:Pedro Cabrita Reis - One after another, a few silent steps[edit]

copyright violation; contemporary artwork; no freedom of panorama.

Martin Sg. (talk) 19:41, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep File:Pedro Cabrita Reis - One after another, a few silent steps - panoramio (1).jpg which doesn't really explain what it is, it might a part of the wall or a part of an artwork, we don't know.
 Delete the rest Paradise Chronicle (talk) 10:27, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


File:Sommerschwüle-von-Rudolf-Lavant.ogg[edit]

Taken from [4]. While the text of the poem that is read is in the public domain, the audio recording is not, nor is it under a free license like the {{Cc-zero}} license claimed by the uploader. Rosenzweig τ 20:03, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Robert Blum - Abschiedsbrief an Carl Cramer.webm[edit]

Taken from [5]. While the text of the letter that is shown is in the public domain, the video and the music are not, nor are they under a free license like the {{Cc-by-sa-4.0}} license claimed by the uploader. Rosenzweig τ 20:10, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Peter Zaffino.png[edit]

This file was initially tagged by Alachuckthebuck as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: COM:CSD#F1, Possible copyright violation: Found elsewhere on the web and unlikely to be own work: Google search Yann (talk) 20:21, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

correct link sorry for the mistake. I thought I fixed that ajaxquickdelete button. @Jeff G, do you know if this is the same issue as before, or this something new?
All the best - Chuck Talk 20:28, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Alachuckthebuck: That's not your fault, they didn't fix the "Challenge speedy deletion" logic yet.   — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 22:20, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:WCK poster.jpg[edit]

For me it's a license laundering - making a derivative of a poster, which itself is not freely licensed. Including (c) logo. Masur (talk) 20:23, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Stefan Hartmann spricht auf einem Landesparteitag von Die Linke Sachsen.jpg[edit]

possible copyvio © Christopher Colditz Lutheraner (talk) 20:24, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Das Foto wurde durch Christopher Colditz im Auftrag von Die Linke Sachsen erstellt. DIE LINKE. Sachsen (talk) 20:43, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@DIE LINKE. Sachsen: In diesem Fall sollte der Urheber (= der Fotograf) oder Rechteinhaber eine Genehmigung per E-Mail an Wikimedia Commons schicken. Details, E-Mail-Adresse, zu verwendender Text etc. siehe COM:VRT/de. --Rosenzweig τ 06:43, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Albania ethnic.jpg[edit]

map of 1941 or so – definitely not own work: https://cartography-gis.com/docsbca/iccgis2016/ICCGIS2016-44.pdf Albinfo (talk) 20:24, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Der-Landbriefträger-von-Rudolf-Lavant-Gedicht-Hörbuch.ogg[edit]

Taken from [6]. While the text of the poem that is read is in the public domain, the audio recording is not, nor is it under a free license like the {{Cc-zero}} license claimed by the uploader. Rosenzweig τ 20:25, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dem-alten-Jahr-von-Rudolf-Lavant-Gedicht-Hörbuch.ogg[edit]

Taken from [7]. While the text of the poem that is read is in the public domain, the audio recording is not, nor is it under a free license like the {{Cc-zero}} license claimed by the uploader. Rosenzweig τ 20:26, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:John Mills in The Truth About Spring (1965).jpg[edit]

The uploader's assertion of copyright notice omission is incorrect. There is the copyright notice: "Copyright (C) 1965, Universal International". Under current US law, works first published in 1965 with a copyright notice are still copyrighted, especially after the law no longer requires renewal registration to extend copyright for such works. George Ho (talk) 20:29, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cafo Beg Ulqini - Regent.jpg[edit]

wrong license, see File:Cafo Beg Ulqini (standing portrait).jpg Albinfo (talk) 20:32, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is colored version of his portrait as regent. EuropaUlqini (talk) 23:57, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I can see that. But I can't see any correct information regarding source and author. Albinfo (talk) 15:17, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:SpongeBob SquarePants character montage.png[edit]

Creative commons release is extremely unlikely to be valid. The rights situation is almost certainly governed by extensive contracts. It is unlikely in the extreme that the person uploading stuff to youtube has the power to alter those contracts in the way needed for a CC release. That the release was not authorised is supported by it being removed after the foundation contacted Nickelodeon  Geni (talk) 21:47, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment - This argument, if upheld, would probably apply to most of the items in Category:NickRewind. For my issues with the argument, see below.
 Keep - This reasoning is based on a combination of speculation and problematic principles.
  • "The rights situation is almost certainly governed by extensive contracts. It is unlikely in the extreme that the person uploading stuff to youtube has the power to alter those contracts in the way needed for a CC release."
    • I'm not entirely sure what you mean by the "rights situation" being "governed by extensive contracts." Nickelodeon (that is, Viacom and its successors) isn't a licensee, but the sole copyright owner of the work (as indicated in copyright registrations for SpongeBob SquarePants). The copyright owner of a work normally has the right to license it however they want. For example, they have granted various licenses to make SpongeBob toys, etc. There's no reason they can't grant another license applying to this material. This license doesn't invalidate any other separate licenses they have given to various SpongeBob-related copyrighted materials.
    • The person uploading this item to YouTube isn't acting in an individual capacity, but on behalf of their employer (that is, the copyright holder).
    • There is a form of corporate responsibility when a license is offered online through the corporation's official channels with a certain license. The fact that the license remained this way for months would only reaffirm its validity. If you accept the argument that any public license offered on a website by a corporation is just the work of a foolish (or rogue) employee, then you'd have to reject most free licenses for corporate-owned material. (You'd also be creating a standard of evidence far above that used for anything else.)
  • "That the release was not authorised is supported by it being removed after the foundation contacted Nickelodeon"
    • This doesn't really hold up, either. While we can say that they didn't reaffirm the license, we also know that they didn't contest the Wikimedia Commons items' hosting in any way, either. Since they certainly have actual knowledge now, you could take this as a tacit admission that the license was always valid, too. Remember, CC licenses remain valid even if the work is no longer distributed by the original copyright holder under that license.
D. Benjamin Miller (talk) 02:02, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
If a company has given a company a exclusive (even for a limited time period) right to produce a toy featuring a character they then can't do a CC release without violating that contract. The person uploading it will have been told to upload it. So all the stuff you have to agree to upload to youtube is probably valid. The person will not have been told to release it under a CC license so that will not be valid.Geni (talk) 09:47, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep That problem has already been resolved by the administrator @Yann and the original video where the image comes from was preserved. Aurelio de Sandoval (Mensajes aquí please) 18:27, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete I still doubt that Nickelodeon or Paramount would have actually allowed their characters to be used in this way. There is an argument that, even if the video as a whole is licensed as such, isolating this frame may not be, in a similar manner to COM:DM. -BRAINULATOR9 (TALK) 01:00, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Nickelodeon or Paramount can't decide how the law is applied. They can only decide on what license they publish the works. And they have decided to publish their videos under a free license. Then we only have to determine if the license allows to separate one frame or a part of a frame. Yann (talk) 09:43, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Reid headshot sweater.jpg[edit]

Potential copyright infringement - source is not PD, and is likely not the author of the image. See this link for exact image match Packer1028 (talk) 21:49, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I work for Delegate Reid and am authorized to use the photo on his Wikipedia page. This photo is also readily and commonly available on other websites. Danielpbnc (talk) 02:45, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment::That is what is known as a conflict of interest, and is not a good thing. - Sumanuil. (talk to me) 06:42, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Amanda Plummer 1987 CBS.jpg[edit]

"© CBS Inc. 1988" on the back as seen at https://historicimages.com/products/dfpy72485. Notice appears to be chopped off the copy which was uploaded to the Commons. Can be undeleted 95 years after publication (Jan 1, 2084). PascalHD (talk) 22:23, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ochilov coat of arms.png[edit]

Never had any educational purpose, was published in order to put to the Wikimedia userpage, and hasn't been used there for years. Fordaemdur (talk) 22:39, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Linkrafin.jpg[edit]

Possible copyvio: The band is marked as the author, G10 CoffeeEngineer (talk) 22:57, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Load cropped resized.jpg[edit]

Possible copyvio: The band is marked as the author CoffeeEngineer (talk) 22:58, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Logo de la banda kÖnige.jpg[edit]

Possible copyvio: Logo of a band CoffeeEngineer (talk) 22:59, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Thony-Ferro (talk · contribs)[edit]

Possible copyvio: Several pictures of the band and logos on a fake cover, Screenshot of an app

CoffeeEngineer (talk) 23:13, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mr eazi hollup vid pix.jpg[edit]

Low resolution image missing full EXIF data, dubious claim of own work CoffeeEngineer (talk) 23:24, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Marché Medong 2.jpg[edit]

Because it is totally blurry steveprutz (talk) 01:24, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Deletion_requests/2024/04/16&oldid=872453844"