Commons:Deletion requests/2024/04/15

14 April 2024

16 April 2024

Deletion requests on 15 April 2024

April 15[edit]

File:Karte Gemeinde San Agustín (Gran Canaria) 2022.png[edit]

Temporarily uploaded duplicate file (with different name) to analyze probems with a de.wikipedia template. Please delete, thanks. Joschi71 (talk) 01:38, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Diese Karte kann gelöscht werden, ist ausser der Grösse ein Duplikat von File:Karte Gemeinde San Bartolomé de Tirajana 2022.png. Gruss --Tschubby (talk) 05:59, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lusitiana Image (6).jpg[edit]

Source country is UK. The two main photos were taken by David McCormack, reported to be aged 20 at the time of the 1915 sinking. Unless he died before 1954, are they not still in copyright period?

(The quality of the newspaper image is very poor - if this is in fact eligible to be uploaded, a somewhat clearer version is available.) Davidships (talk) 03:31, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete From what I could find, he was born David Craig McCormick (not McCormack) on 7 December 1894 in Ayr and died in the 2nd quarter of 1966 in Haverfordwest, Wales. He's identified as Marconi operator or radio engineer in some documents, so that should be him. Undelete in 2037. --Rosenzweig τ 07:01, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

See also [1] which confirms what I found. --Rosenzweig τ 07:05, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Davidships: If the clearer version you have is this exact page, you could upload it as a 2nd version of this file so that it is already in place for undeletion of the file in 2037. --Rosenzweig τ 07:22, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Tried to do that via "Upload a new version of this file" but it stops with a notice to use upload wizard requiring licensing entry (but no field to add it), or defaults to overwriting page (for which I do not permission). Should I just upload it as a fresh image and then provide the link here? Davidships (talk) 10:08, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Davidships: Yes, it'd probably be easiest if you did that; I can then merge the two files. --Rosenzweig τ 12:21, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks again, it's at [2], though I made a mess of it, and I have requested change to "last photographs..." (ironic, given the mis-spelling in the file discussed here). Davidships (talk) 22:39, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I've merged the files. The undeleted file can be moved to File:The last photographs of "Lusitania" 1915.jpg or another suitable name in 2037. --Rosenzweig τ 04:16, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:A Sampling of Montreal's Exterior Walls - 2 (313733639).jpg[edit]

Photo of 2-D thing. -- Asclepias (talk) 05:13, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Looks to be graffiti. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:45, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files in Category:Gallery Place (WMATA station)[edit]

Recent (2000) artwork - the US does not have freedom of panorama for artworks.

Pi.1415926535 (talk) 05:25, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pelzmoden Schülke, Hilden (Web-Einnäh-Etikett).jpg[edit]

This file was initially tagged by Wdwd as no license (No license since) Kürschner (talk) 07:05, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Info License for the photo is missing, because the photo meet the threshold of originality; If you are the author/photograph of this photo, I assume so, please choose a valid license tag like {{Cc-zero}} so we can close this DR, thanks.--Wdwd (talk) 08:46, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pelzmoden Schülke, Hilden (Web-Einnäh-Etikett).jpg[edit]

Missing license for photograph. The shown logo may be below COM:TOO; We are missing a correct license for the photo. (Remark: User:Kürschner (uploader) removed the missing license tag, see history, so I stared a regular DR) Wdwd (talk) 07:39, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Own photo,I gave a second license now: {{Cc-Zero}}. -- Kürschner (talk) 07:50, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Old Oswestry Hillfort (aerial).jpg[edit]

Uncertain validity of Creative Commons License; possible copyright violation. Although licensed on Geograph under CCA2.0 (from where the image has been uploaded to Commons), the image is credited on Geograph to Oswestry Borderland Tourism so may not have been uploaded by or with the permission of the copyright holder[3][4],. Rupples (talk) 08:58, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Scheveningen-Pier1.jpg[edit]

ce fichier m'appartient Normann Szkop 212.63.117.20 09:13, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mohamedu Shitta Mosque.jpg[edit]

The original image in the in public domain. We don't have permission for cc-by-sa for the digital restoration. Either the restoration didn't add additional originality and is in the public domain, too, or the image has to be deleted. Krd 10:20, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Previous discussions regarding this image: A thread at the English Wikipedia and a thread here. Felix QW (talk) 10:25, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep it's probable that the "restoration" was mere cropping, but in any case the uploader is the person who did that, and they uploaded the results themself, as CC by-sa. This is a bad deletion nomination. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 10:46, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The thread discussing this on English Wikipedia can be found at en:WP:MCQ#Can a PD picture be put back into copyright? (the link added above is incorrect). The uploader has been indefinitely blocked on English Wikipedia for making legal threats, but they still can edit on Commons. They were advised by quite a few people at WP:MCQ that this needed to be discussed on Commons, but they never never did even after a discussion was opened at COM:HD about this file. The uploader hasn't denied uploading the file under the CC license, and their main issue seems to to do with how they're being attributed in Wikipedia articles where the file is being used. The uploader wants to be attributed directly in the file's caption, but this is contrary to en:MOS:CREDITS. When this was explained to the uploader, they started accussing others of piracy and demanding Commmons either compensate them for using the image or delete the image. If someone wants to delete this as courtesy just to put an end to the drama once and for all, I don't think that'll be any real loss since an uncropped version of the same image was subsequently found and uploaded as File:Prince Oyekan - Oba of Lagos and others, photo by Neils Walwin Holm, 1894-2.jpg by someone else. -- Marchjuly (talk) 07:37, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for pointing that out - I have now also corrected the link in my previous comment. Felix QW (talk) 12:32, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delting this file - which is in use on multiple projects - would indeed be a "great loss". The face of the individual in question is obscured by a printing error or damage in the lower-resolution alternative version to which you refer. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 15:18, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for clarifying both the usage and quality of the file. It seemed possible (at least) to me that a new crop could be made from the larger image, but that might not be the case. FWIW, I think the uploader is just unhappy that the file isn't being attributed as they like and their posts requesting its deletion are sort of en:WP:PRAM-like. I don't think there's a valid COM:L or COM:SCOPE related reason for deleting the file; it should only be deleted as a courtesy to the uploader if that's what the community decides it wants to do in order to put an end to any drama associated with the image. I do think that the uploader's claim of copyright over the crop is a misunderstanding of copyright law, but in some jurisdications this might not be so clear. Commons policy, however, seems to largely follow en:Bridgeman v. Corel in that a slavish reproduction (including a crop) of another image isn't sufficient to generate a new copyright for the reproduction. Given the way the file is currently licensed and attributed to the uploader (at least the restoration part), I think it's probably not a problem for Commons to keep this if that's what the community decides to do. -- Marchjuly (talk) 00:41, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Courtesy deletion applies to unused files only. This one is used at the moment. Ankry (talk) 13:47, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:2 MELIN Opus N°5.jpg[edit]

This file was initially tagged by Habertix as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: La formulation "Je suis l'ayant droit de l'artiste." n'est pas suffisante -- voir Placer des images sous une licence : quand contacter VRT ? . Yann (talk) 11:38, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:3 MELIN EcritureEnluminée-11.tif[edit]

This file was initially tagged by Habertix as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: La formulation "Je suis l'ayant droit de l'artiste." n'est pas suffisante -- voir Placer des images sous une licence : quand contacter VRT ? . Yann (talk) 11:38, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Claude MELIN, sans titre, Trait de plume.jpg[edit]

This file was initially tagged by Habertix as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: La formulation "Je suis l'ayant droit de l'artiste." n'est pas suffisante -- voir Placer des images sous une licence : quand contacter VRT ? . Yann (talk) 11:38, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files in Category:Coats of arms of House Targaryen[edit]

copies or derivatives of the design created by HBO for Game of Thrones per special:diff/868475274.

— 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 12:28, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A few are just a three-headed dragon with no (copyright) relation to the show's coat of arms -- File:A Song of Ice and Fire arms of House Targaryen blanked scroll.svg, File:A Song of Ice and Fire arms of House Targaryen no scroll.jpg, File:A Song of Ice and Fire arms of House Targaryen yellow scroll.jpg, File:Targaryen 001.png. Don't see any reason to delete those. The rest do look problematic. Carl Lindberg (talk) 13:58, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete for 3-headed dragon in circle. Agree with Clindberg files that should be kept. Glrx (talk) 15:04, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Agree that the ones cited appear to be original artwork put under a valid license. --RAN (talk) 22:51, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, I'm the one who originally uploaded the "GoT shirt - Fire and Blood.jpg" on Commons. Just wanted to disclose that it's a picture of me wearing that shirt, and I currently use it as my Wikipedia user page profile picture. I named it as such because I felt that the most way direct way to address it. May I know exactly how it warrants deletion? Thank you. Espresso (talk) 02:33, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Sapphirewhirlwind: The image on the shirt is a DW of the design created by HBO for Game of Thrones per special:diff/868475274. — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 03:09, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Noted on that. Vice Chairman of the Tortured Poets Department (talk) 15:35, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Sapphirewhirlwind: The photo appears to be focusing on the design on the shirt. If the focus was something wider, it would probably be "incidental". If it's more meant to be a profile pic, maybe the design could be slightly blurred. Carl Lindberg (talk) 03:30, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Okay then, so do I need to reupload the photo (to the existing file) with that edit in mind? Or will the deletion proceed and I should upload a new file that doesn't count as a derivative work? Vice Chairman of the Tortured Poets Department (talk) 15:37, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Sapphirewhirlwind: Either one, just make sure you have a copy to blur or crop. — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 03:54, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mediapart wordmark.svg (OLD VERSIONS ONLY, KEEP CURRENT)[edit]

The two old versions of this logo, imported from Wikipedia FR, are too complex for PD-textlogo and therefore copyvio. The current version, wordmark only, has been uploaded to remedy to this and should be kept. ~ nicolas (talk) 12:58, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:WikinotizieL.jpg[edit]

Microscopic JPEG version of File:Wikinews-logo.svg. Replacement requested. Yann (talk) 13:02, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This jpg icon has a size of 10k, the svg has 425k. --Achim55 (talk) 20:53, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:2020-10-10 台中捷運綠線加值售票機.jpg[edit]

Copyrighted screenshot. Solomon203 (talk) 13:05, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Aaa000000 (talk · contribs)[edit]

Per COM:PACKAGING: Chocolate bar wrappers featuring drawings/photographs which are most likely copyrighted.

Rosenzweig τ 19:12, 30 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 19:48, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Aaa000000 (talk · contribs)[edit]

i'm sceptical whether planet dark owns permission to the movie.

File:Petra Dubayova.jpg

RZuo (talk) 13:58, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Тэхніка ў масы.jpg[edit]

Wrong license. More information about the copyright status. Yann (talk) 14:02, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Да здаляйце, чаго ўж там, якасць фоткі дрэнная, сфоткана на прас. Yozas gubka (talk) 15:06, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Escudo de Güinope.svg[edit]

No valid license. Yann (talk) 14:05, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

PD-COA-Honduras does not exist yet SpinnerLaserzthe2nd (talk) 15:39, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Escudo de Talanga.svg[edit]

No valid license. Yann (talk) 14:05, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

it appears that PD-COA-Honduras does not exist SpinnerLaserzthe2nd (talk) 15:38, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Escudo del Cuerpo de Bomberos de Honduras.svg[edit]

No valid license. Yann (talk) 14:06, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

PD-COA-Honduras does not exist yet SpinnerLaserzthe2nd (talk) 15:39, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Varde-Kommune-logo-smal-RGB-blaa.png[edit]

No valid license. Yann (talk) 14:10, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tim Hortons US Logo.jpg[edit]

No valid license. Yann (talk) 14:16, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You can just add public domain cause the logo is not suitable for copyright. 166.48.119.67 18:09, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

And why not? It is complex enough to have a copyright, so unless there is some evidence that it is in the public domain due to age, lack of notice or renewal, we can't keep it here. Yann (talk) 18:13, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Raczek44 (talk · contribs)[edit]

Unused logos, no educational value, out of scope.

P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:17, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:LL-Q12107 (bre)-Erell An Danteg-banet.wav[edit]

erreur d'orthographe et de prononciation Erell An Danteg (talk) 14:54, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Микола Пукач - Другий праворуч. Вишкіл боївки УНС в селі Рудавка в 1942 р. .jpg[edit]

There never was a valid license. Yann (talk) 15:25, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kourage Beatz NSI.jpg[edit]

If this is a photo of someone Justinbenji is writing on English Wikipedia, then I wonder how and why they said "Own work". I also found this picture at https://open.spotify.com/artist/01wazsLDLOeJgUmj3306u3 Vanderwaalforces (talk) 15:30, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:10 - 2022-02-14 toko session labo (30).jpg[edit]

Possible copyvio: The uploader is not the author, as per metadata CoffeeEngineer (talk) 15:39, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Aziouz Raïs (1954 - 2022) عزيوز رايس.jpg[edit]

Possible copyvio: File from the internet, The uploader is not the author CoffeeEngineer (talk) 15:45, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Arash-Bayat-Music (talk · contribs)[edit]

Possible copyvio: The model is marked as the author, F10

CoffeeEngineer (talk) 15:46, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ernst Enzensperger.jpg[edit]

The artist of this 1950 painting, German painter de:Rudolf Schlichter, died in 1955, so it is not in the public domain in Germany yet and also still protected in the US. The file should therefore be deleted. It can be restored in 2046 (URAA). Rosenzweig τ 15:48, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I see that the uploader now claims in the image description that the author is Enzenberger himself – which is hardly plausible, Enzensberger was not a painter.

In the edit commentary, they claim it's uncertain if Schlichter was the author. But that does not mean that the painting is "anonymous" or similar. Even if the artist's name were not credited in the original publication, that does not mean we can treat this as an anonymous work under German law, because pre-mid 1995 German works of the bildende Künste, like this one, cannot be anonymous or pseudonymous works because the old German copyright law, still relevant in these cases, said so. See Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Germany#Anonymous and pseudonymous works. So the file should be deleted. Per [5], the book it was taken from was published in 1951. So the file can be restored in 2072 with {{PD-old-assumed-expired}}. --Rosenzweig τ 09:18, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Flipturn at House of Blues Orlando.jpg[edit]

Possible copyvio: The uploader is not the author, as per metadata CoffeeEngineer (talk) 15:53, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Arashel1991 (talk · contribs)[edit]

Derivative works or copyright violations. Also may be out of scope, not used, no category, etc.

Yann (talk) 15:55, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Olympia Theatre Facade.jpg[edit]

Way too recent as a bulding/structure in order to fall out of copyrights, since there's no FOP in Greece. 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ^{ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ} 16:23, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kenny Brooks Upload.jpg[edit]

unlikely to be own work. only upload by this user and not categorized despite a category for Brooks existing. Seems to be the same image as used in this post SDudley (talk) 16:25, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tpac-donors-dinner 16803545471 o.jpg[edit]

portrait not in the public domain, and is not de minimus SecretName101 (talk) 16:45, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Whitman-field-office-visit 20964992896 o.jpg[edit]

portrait actually quite evidently appears not to have been taken as part of photographers duties as a state employee; but rather likely taken on commission for the campaign or for some other non-state capacity SecretName101 (talk) 16:46, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Whitman-field-office-visit 20804429069 o.jpg[edit]

portrait actually quite evidently appears not to have been taken as part of photographers duties as a state employee; but rather likely taken on commission for the campaign or for some other non-state capacity SecretName101 (talk) 16:46, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:New-portrait-in-the-office 16681139536 o.jpg[edit]

portraits not in public domain, and are not de minimus SecretName101 (talk) 16:46, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Salem-new-hampshire-field-office-visit 20368601754 o.jpg[edit]

portrait actually quite evidently appears not to have been taken as part of photographers duties as a state employee; but rather likely taken on commission for the campaign or for some other non-state capacity SecretName101 (talk) 16:46, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]