Commons:Deletion requests/2024/04/12

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
11 April 2024
13 April 2024
Deletion requests on 12 April 2024

April 12[edit]

File:《宣統皇帝朝服像》.png[edit]

1.此图像裁剪自附有电脑字体的现代粗劣伪作。
2.上传者声称此图创作于1908年4月2日，但彼时溥仪年仅2岁，亦未成为皇帝，绝不可能是图中青少年皇帝的形象。
3.经检索，此文件的来源指向了一个欺诈性网站。
4.上传者在上传此图后，旋即在多个语言的维基百科的“溥仪”条目中引用此图，有施行破坏和传播欺诈网站的嫌疑。 注荼 (talk) 02:39, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Aprilsnar 2001.png[edit]

Image from a Danish newspaper in 2001. Nothing indicates that the uploader is the copyright owner. grillo (talk) 15:49, 3 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I took the picture in 2001 with my Pentax SFX model 1988 roll film camera. April 9th 2007 I scanned and uploaded the picture. You're right that it has been in a Danish newspaper later. AFAIK it was the tabloid B.T., and the scumbags didn't give credit to Wikipedia. --Necessary Evil (talk) 08:20, 4 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Ok. I understood it as this picture was taken for the 2001 article and then scanned from that article. Maybe I should have noticed that the quality seems to be better than can be accomplished from newspaper scans though. Maybe the image description needs a source though, because there seems to be some debate whether this was a simple april fool's joke or a marketing ploy in form of an april fool's joke by Gevalia. /grillo (talk) 16:22, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Well, it involves a lot of red tape (and I don't mean the cordon) to place a supposedly strayed subway car in the middle of the town hall square surrounded by loose tiles. It involves a lot of planning, but I don't know how involved the journalists were. I'll guess it's "a marketing ploy in form of an April fool's joke by Gevalia". The story was told in a newspaper, but I don't recall if there were any pictures. --Necessary Evil (talk) 22:08, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I don't think you can publish photos of artwork in Denmark, see Template:FoP-Denmark. Danrok (talk) 10:48, 9 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: If anyone thinks this is also a FOP case, please renominate it, but the concern about ownership has been answered. –⁠moogsi (blah) 11:35, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Aprilsnar 2001.png[edit]

No FoP for 3D works in Denmark A1Cafel (talk) 04:25, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hold your horses, the company has been contacted for consent. Necessary Evil (talk) 00:44, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


File:TV Cello (1966).jpg[edit]

Per COM:FOP US, photographs of 3D art taken in the US are considered copyrighted Adeletron 3030 (talk) 05:00, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


I should add, the photograph was taken at the San Francisco Museum of Modern Art. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 12:57, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rosinger Wappen.jpeg[edit]

FAKEWAPPEN OHNE QUELLENANGABE UND RELEVANZ Rovere (talk) 09:06, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Picture is also a copyright violation, its obivous not from a historic book, but a new painting, artist or source not mentioned. --Rovere (talk) 11:05, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Die Relevanz der Finanzdynastie Rosinger dokumentiert eindeutig der Videomitschnitt einer Ehrung für Herrn Gregor Rosinger und den Finanzkonzern Rosinger Group durch Frau Outi Slootboom, Direktorin der Generaldirektion der Europäischen Kommission, auch hier wird das Wappen in einem von der Europäischen Kommission zusammengestellten Vorstellungsvideos mehrfach gezeigt. Das Video dauert ca. 6 Minuten und ist hier zu finden: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HbUn-V0peE8
Weiters dokumentieren eine Reihe von Veröffentlichungen von Wertpapierbörsen, usw. eindrucksvoll die Relevanz der Finanzdynastie, z.B. auf der Wiener Börse - bitte Indexkapitalisierung mit mehr als 3,7 Milliarden Euro im Link beachten - der Rosinger Index Rosgix https://www.wienerborse.at/indizes/aktuelle-indexwerte/uebersicht/?ISIN=AT0000A1YXV6&ID_NOTATION=201653404&market=wbag&typo3=0&news=0&products=1&cHash=cdbff4ea6b23263826687f0e2b12576f oder https://www.wienerborse.at/listing/boersegang-ipo/capital-market-coach/rosinger-group/
Es ist verständlich, dass ein gänzlich anders orientierter User wie Rovere (dessen bürgerlicher Name bekannt ist) sich in Ortschaften wie z.B. Drasenhofen oder in der Bezirksstadt wo er 1972 geboren ist, besser orientieren kann als in der Finanzwelt, dann muss er aber auch die Größe haben zu seinem Nichtwissen zu stehen. Wallstreet Fighter (talk) 09:24, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Der Löschantrag ist zu daher unverzüglich zu entfernen. Wallstreet Fighter (talk) 09:38, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Wir sind hier nicht bei der Wikipedia, folglich ist das dortige Relevanzprinzip nicht entscheidend. Hier gilt: Ist die Datei von einem Copyright geschützt? Ist die Datei vom Projektrahmen gedeckt? COM:PRP und COM:EDUSE. Selbst gemalte Fantasiewappen sind in der Regel nicht davon abgedeckt. Die Beweislast hat der Hochlader.--GerritR (talk) 05:51, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Das Geschäftswappen ist schon viel länger in Verwendung als dieses Wappenbild (die Finanzdynastie geht auf das Jahr 1530 zurück). Das Fotografierte Exemplar ist Teil einer Serie, die 1919 zur Ausstattung von weiteren Geschäftsstandorten gemalt wurde. Der deutsche Wappenmaler (Name mir nicht mehr in Erinnerung, als Kind hatte mir mein Großvater diesen aber genannt) hat 1919 somit etwas bereits bestehendes und lange im Geschäftsverkehr verwendetes nachgemalt/vervielfältigt. Der Urheberrechtsschutz ist somit schon seit vielen Jahren abgelaufen. Somit kann sich nur die Frage nach dem Urheberrechtsschutz der Fotografie des Wappenbildes stellen. Der Fotograf des hochgeladenen Fotos bin ich und ich habe dieses zur Verwendung freigegeben. Wallstreet Fighter (talk) 21:32, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Wenn Du Dir die obigenen Links (wo Du gemeint hast, das sind nur Relevanzen für Wikipedia) ansiehst, dann ist der Beweis für die geschäftliche Relevanz der Rosinger Group als einer der bedeutendsten Finanzkonzerne Europas erbracht (und zwar durch eine Aussage der Europäischen Kommission https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HbUn-V0peE8 ). Ein altes Geschäftswappen ist so etwas wie die Urform von Logos, Du findest das im Bild dargestellte Geschäftswappen sowohl auf Websites der Rosinger Group in Verwendung, z.B. auf www.rosingerfinance.com (gleich im obersten Foto der Startseite siehst Du das fotografierte Wappenbild in einem Rosinger Besprechungsraum hängen) oder auf www.gregor-rosinger.at ganz oben auf allen Seiten, usw.
Dass Logos von bedeutenden Finanzkonzernen für Wikimedia relavant sind beweist z.B. das Logos der Alchemy Partner ( File:Alchemy Partners logo.svg), somit ist es nur logisch, das fotografierte Wappenbild in Wikimedia zu behalten. Wallstreet Fighter (talk) 22:03, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Хрэстаматыя па беларускай народнай музычнай творчасці.pdf[edit]

This file was initially tagged by Gleb Leo as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Compilator's copyright of this book Yann (talk) 09:25, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is no author's work in this document --Чаховіч Уладзіслаў (talk) 14:41, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Danmark.jpeg[edit]

Sourced from the 17:34, 7 October 2006 version of File:Christian III of Denmark.jpg, should be a redirect Nutshinou Talk! 13:53, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:PBSKIDSSprout.png[edit]

This file was initially tagged by Krd as no permission (No permission since)

COM:TOO? King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:37, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: below ToO (per discussion). Ruthven (msg) 14:19, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:PBSKIDSSprout.png[edit]

Complex logo, surpasses threshold of originality. The blue part is text only, but the green leaf is complex. 207.241.245.200 15:02, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:PBS Kids Sprout.png[edit]

Complex logo, surpasses threshold of originality. The blue part is text only, but the green leaf is complex. 207.241.245.200 15:04, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Yodo1 logo.png[edit]

Complex logo, surpasses threshold of originality. The text part is under TOO, but the orange fish is complex. 207.241.245.200 15:11, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Isn't there proof of VRT permission from the copyright owner in the license description section? Even though the logo meets the threshold for copyright protection, because VRT permission has been granted, the copyright owner should be allowed to use the logo freely, and the logo may also be shared on Wikimedia Commons. 114.10.101.15 16:13, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Vénusz.jpg[edit]

Probable copyright violation. The file was uploaded as "own work" dated 2015 by Ruboaron, but the subject died in 2000 and this is obviously a copy of a printed photo. The original photo isn't old enough to be obviously in the public domain. bjh21 (talk) 15:28, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


File:The view south from a footpath towards a mural on Gilbert Daniel House and also towards other adjacent buildings situated between Brick Lane and Allen Gardens, London E1.jpg[edit]

No FoP for "graphic works" in the United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 16:49, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


I have no problem whatsoever if this image is deleted. There are other more complete photographs of this particular mural online even if possibly not on Wikimedia. Though my view is probably not relevant here, and while I greatly appreciate the wonderful work of street artists, I do think the law regarding FOP in public spaces in the UK, which I think was drafted over 30 years ago, is outdated, unduly restrictive and potentially questionable in cases where a mural or street art forms just a part of a wider panorama in a public space but I realise and appreciate that Wikimedia may not wish to take any risk whatsoever in that regard and I've personally no problem at all with this particular image being deleted. Alisdare (talk) 20:42, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Scottish Premier League.jpg[edit]

Duplicate of File:Scott McDonald (Celtic) and Graeme Smith (Motherwell).jpg Crowsus (talk) 19:55, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:ClareLopezActor.jpg[edit]

copyright violation? photographer is Scott Dentinger Xocolatl (talk) 20:44, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lomas de Zamora, Buenos Aires Province, Argentina - panoramio.jpg[edit]

No FOP for art works on public spaces in Argentina. Banfield - Amenazas aquí 21:03, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


File:Lomas de Zamora, Buenos Aires Province, Argentina - panoramio (25).jpg[edit]

No FOP for art works on public spaces in Argentina. Banfield - Amenazas aquí 21:03, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


File:Lomas de Zamora, Buenos Aires Province, Argentina - panoramio (26).jpg[edit]

No FOP for art works on public spaces in Argentina. Banfield - Amenazas aquí 21:03, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


File:2023-07-16 13-25-50 ILCE-7C DSCHQ3570 DxO (53207159831).jpg[edit]

Derivative work, copyrighted sculpture and character Di (they-them) (talk) 21:09, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


File:Croatia P8134651 (3937574864).jpg[edit]

Low quality, no identifiable subject for educational purposes, out of scope. Gauss (talk) 21:41, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:KC Logotype RU Ver.png[edit]

Non-trivial logo of a hardly notable institution. I don't know what is Khazakh copyright law for this case but surely it is not not an "own work". Ignatus (talk) 21:54, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:ChatGPT Homepage.png[edit]

Copyrighted image with Windows and Google Chrome; Better to use it with PD Shapes on Linux (Such as Ubuntu), and a free as freedom web browser (such as Firefox). Alejitao123 (talk) 23:24, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep. Icons in this screenshot are de minimis. The use of non-free software does not inherently make an image of that software non-free. Omphalographer (talk) 00:18, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Elmer Lappalainen.jpg[edit]

stupid joke, random photo with absourd description Bestalex (talk) 23:27, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files in Category:Documenta 14[edit]

copyright violation; contemporary artworks; no freedom of panorama.

ok; sorry. Martin Sg. (talk) 18:43, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Martin Sg. (talk) 19:54, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Some of these don't show copyright protected artwork but buildings from the outside that are perfectly ok. Please check again! Herbert Ortner (talk) 20:21, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I have removed some on which no-one has commented on yet. This doesn't mean I have checked all, though. On the series starting with File:Documenta 14 Der Parthenon der Bücher bei Nacht 01.jpg there was an interesting precedent about the wrapped Reichstag by Christo, which then was deleted as well even though it was an exterior of a building. Paradise Chronicle (talk) 08:03, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Deletion_requests/2024/04/12&oldid=876112659"