Commons:Deletion requests/2024/05/10

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

May 10[edit]

File:Western cometery-GizaG4000.jpg[edit]

Bing Maps screenshot Einsamer Schütze (talk) 00:03, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Giza-Western-cometery-group.jpg[edit]

Bing Maps screenshot Einsamer Schütze (talk) 00:04, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:East wall of the chepel- G2155 above the entrance.tif[edit]

Probably not PD Einsamer Schütze (talk) 00:17, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pele (1078204278).jpg[edit]

Unidentified apparent work of art Krok6kola (talk) 00:17, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:South wall of the chapel G2155.tif[edit]

Probably not PD Einsamer Schütze (talk) 00:17, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Merchant barges - east wall chapel G2155.jpg[edit]

Probably not PD Einsamer Schütze (talk) 00:19, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mastaba G2155-chapel east wall.png[edit]

Probably not PD Einsamer Schütze (talk) 00:19, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mastaba G2155-chapel west wall.tif[edit]

Probably not PD Einsamer Schütze (talk) 00:19, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Giza nekropole map G 2155 Keninisut I.tif[edit]

Bing Maps screenshot Einsamer Schütze (talk) 00:19, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Keninsut-Neferhanisut G2155.tif[edit]

Not PD yet, creator Hermann Junker (1877-1962) died less than 70 years ago Einsamer Schütze (talk) 00:20, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Giza-west- necropolis G4160-4260street.tif[edit]

Not PD yet, creator Hermann Junker (1877-1962) died less than 70 years ago Einsamer Schütze (talk) 00:20, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Coat of arms of a new Yugoslavia (alternate version 2).svg[edit]

No educational use, fictional coat of arms Zoupan (talk) 22:37, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It definitely should not be used in a Wikipedia article, but it's pretty harmless (similar to a number of other such files). AnonMoos (talk) 11:37, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: In dubio pro reo as the file is used in it wp Sanandros (talk) 22:39, 1 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


File:Coat of arms of a new Yugoslavia (alternate version 2).svg[edit]

This is supposedly a fictional cart of arms for a so called "new Yugoslavia", whatever that is. So the image should be deleted as OOS since it doesn't serve any educational purpose. Adamant1 (talk) 00:22, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pedro e Simão.jpg[edit]

blurry photo of unidentified people Krok6kola (talk) 00:36, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Leipziger Volkszeitung 9.5.2012 Zeman.jpg[edit]

not in PD, not published under CC Einsamer Schütze (talk) 00:38, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Zhenis Qasymbek.jpg[edit]

gov.kz does not publish its images with CC0 1.0. Malik Nursultan B (talk) 00:59, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Fictional flag of Rhodes.svg[edit]

Out of COM:SCOPE fantasy flag; COM:NOTHOST. GPinkerton (talk) 13:15, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, per nomination. Veverve (talk) 09:58, 16 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep INUSE, and (yet another) highly pejorative nomination from this editor who stretches "invention" (this does appear to be a flag which has been invented, perhaps by this uploader) into dismissive terms like "fantasy" and citing NOTHOST. It is hardly breaching use of Commons as a personal web host when this image in INUSE across Wikipedia.
There is no WP:OR rule here at Commons. The creation of a flag like this, with Rhodes as a charge upon an existing national flag, has a long vexillogical tradition to represent regions. It's being used for that purpose at Wikipedia; this is legitimate and we should support it. Andy Dingley (talk) 11:39, 16 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Andy Dingley: no-one is citing WP:OR. Your allusions to it are a strawman argument. You have not presented any plausible reasons as to why you believe Commons policies should be ignored in this case, and instead you make misplaced references to irrelevant rules on other Wikis. This is not a reasonable course of argument to attempt. GPinkerton (talk) 12:04, 16 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: is in use and I don't see it as a fake, it is a compilation of real images that could have value in illustrating. --rubin16 (talk) 07:18, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Fictional flag of Rhodes.svg[edit]

This is a fictional flag that's only being used on a couple of random user galleries. And I don't think it's inherently has any educational value just because it's a combination of elements from real flags either. So the image should be deleted as COPYVIO as OOS unless someone can provide evidence to the contrary. Adamant1 (talk) 01:00, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete original keep arguments are absurd, amounting to “Andy Dingley uses the Chewbacca defense and rubin16 agrees”. This is clearly OOS and the value of decorating some userpages is outweighed by the bad precedent set by this egregious case of admin supervoting. Dronebogus (talk) 11:45, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep For exactly the same reasons as last time. Andy Dingley (talk) 19:26, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Your argument was nonsense back then and it remains nonsense almost three years later. Dronebogus (talk) 08:37, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete per nom. WikiCommons is not your free webhost for your original artistic creations (COM:SCOPE, COM:HOST). Veverve (talk) 10:38, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Heit el-Ghurab Workers Town.jpg[edit]

Bing maps screenshot Einsamer Schütze (talk) 01:01, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cattle Butchering Scene from Saqqara.jpg[edit]

Copyrighted material Einsamer Schütze (talk) 01:02, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Flag_of_Canadian_History.PNG[edit]

This flag never existed, and it being used in a semi-official manner , that's not appropriate. Fry1989 (talk) 19:59, 25 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have checked the Stub it's in on Wikipedia-EN, it was just added earlier today, without any discussion anywhere regarding it. I have since undone that insert, as this is completely inappropriate. It should be deleted. Fry1989 (talk) 22:04, 25 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
What makes it inappropriate? It's the Canadian flag with two colors instead of one. The first one proposed in 1966 had two blue bars representing the Atlantic and Pacific oceans.--Harfang (talk) 20:23, 28 March ::2011 (UTC)
I do like what you did with the history stub, but it doesn't explain why having this two coloured flag on file is wrong!--Harfang (talk) 20:27, 28 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
This is the flag proposed in 1964, and it's quite different from this file. It was never adopted, or even used unofficially. It's not appropriate for those reasons. Fry1989 (talk) 01:09, 29 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
 Question Are we quite sure this was not one of the choices in the design process? -- Given that it is halfway between the Pearson flag and the final choice, that seems at least possible. If that is true, then we should keep it to illustrate the process.      Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 15:55, 1 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: in use Jcb (talk) 14:44, 3 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Flag of Canadian History.PNG[edit]

The file was previously nominated for deletion since the flag is fictional but it was kept due to being in use on Wikipedia at the time. That doesn't seem to be the case anymore though. So the image should be deleted as OOS unless someone can provide evidence to the contrary. Adamant1 (talk) 01:09, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mcas iwakuni a insig.jpg[edit]

This is an old logo for MCAS Iwakuni. Iwakunicommstrat (talk) 01:41, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:'Noodles' në Shqipëri.webp[edit]

Seems like it is a copyvio of https://www.freepik.com/free-photo/top-view-delicious-noodles-concept_11381863.htm Bawolff (talk) 02:07, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:SZ 深圳 Shenzhen 龍崗 Longgang 吉華路 Jihua Road 坂田北站 Bantian North Station drink vending machine May 2024 R12S.jpg[edit]

COM:PACKAGING, also Copyrighted Vita Smiley World. see: Commons:Deletion requests/File:维他柠檬茶Smiley World瓶装.jpg メイド理世 (talk) 02:18, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Files in Category:Golden Fire Dog[edit]

Copyvios, taken from website with "all rights reserved"; moreover, hoax or personal ranks, out of scope.

P 1 9 9   02:29, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:KY-16-senate-districts.svg[edit]

This file has been superseded by c:File:KY-16-senate-districts accurate vs.svg, which contains corrected information. Mad Mismagius (talk) 02:32, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ants 2.jpg[edit]

Sorry this picture is not interesting for an encyclopedia Perfectodefecto (talk) 03:08, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quite interesting for me though. Keep. 186.174.37.27 19:19, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Miss teen universe corp (talk · contribs)[edit]

Spam files depicting common and generic subjects

Dronebogus (talk) 03:24, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Flag of Communist California.jpeg[edit]

Activist art. No context within any article. Not used with exception of a few user pages. DevinCook (talk) 06:37, 10 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Images primarily or only used on user pages are allowed -- consult {{User page image}}. This is a "Special or fictional flag". Commons has many hundreds of them, and they usually aren't deleted just for being "Special or fictional" -- only if they're maliciously hoaxing or hatemongering.... AnonMoos (talk) 14:20, 13 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
In the case of this image, I would favor the "maliciously hoaxing or hatemongering" argument. -DevinCook (talk) 21:18, 13 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Really? en:User:Kelapstick/UBX/CommieCali says "This User doesn't think California is the First Communist State of America, he just likes this flag." -- AnonMoos (talk) 22:11, 13 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: In use. Hopefully communist witch hunt is past. Yann (talk) 09:20, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Flag of Communist California.jpeg[edit]

Out of COM:SCOPE user-generated flag; violation of COM:NOTHOST, COM:SELFIE, COM:EV. A realistic educational purpose is a policy requirement for all Commons files. All files with no such purpose must be deleted: "Wikimedia Commons is not your personal free web host". GPinkerton (talk) 20:16, 20 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Mysterymanblue: COM:INUSE states: "If an image is in use on another project (aside from use on talk pages or user pages), that is enough for it to be within scope." (emphasis added) Being in use on a talk page or user page does not mean it is within COM:SCOPE. COM:SPAM suggests "Artwork without obvious educational use, including non-educational artwork uploaded to showcase the artist's skills" … "are not realistically useful for an educational purpose" and "An otherwise non-educational file does not acquire educational purpose solely because it is in use on a gallery page or in a category on Commons, nor solely because it is in use on a user page". If a file – such as this one – is out of scope; it should be deleted. GPinkerton (talk) 01:24, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@GPinkerton Might be {{User page image}}? Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 22:57, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. "The uploading of small numbers of images (e.g. of yourself) for use on a personal user page of Commons or another project is allowed as long as that user is or was an active participant on that project.". —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 17:53, 6 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Flag of Communist California.jpeg[edit]

This is a fake flag for "Communist California." The only usage outside of file logs seems to be on a user talk page along with the caption "This User previously lived in the Shit-Hole State of California, and believes it to be the First Communist State of America." So at least IMO it doesn't follow the "good faith" part of the guideline about a file being kept if it's in use. There's no educational value to it outside of that either. So the image should be deleted as OOS, if not also due to the clearly malicious nature of it. Adamant1 (talk) 03:55, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Flag of the Horizon Islands.png[edit]

Out of COM:SCOPE user-generated fantasy flag; violation of COM:NOTHOST, COM:SELFIE, COM:EV. A realistic educational purpose is a policy requirement for all Commons files. All files with no such purpose must be deleted: "Wikimedia Commons is not your personal free web host". ThomasFan707 (talk) 04:32, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep Just like almost every other fantasy flag deletion, this claim comes without merit. The project scope does not exclude depictions of fantasy, and the nominator has not clearly articulated a reason why this file falls out of the project scope (citing several policies is not a reason). This flag, in fact, is not just the random creation of some user but an image asset from ARMA 3, a notable video game, and therefore has potential illustrative value for articles about that game.  Mysterymanblue  07:36, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 21:01, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Flag of the Horizon Islands.png[edit]

This image was nominated for deletion a while ago since it's fictious. Although it was kept. Presumably because it was in use at the time. That doesn't seem to be the case now though. So the image should be deleted as OOS since it clearly lacks any kind of educational value. Adamant1 (talk) 04:22, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete SVG available. – Illegitimate Barrister (talkcontribs), 04:38, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:“Flexeed”.jpg[edit]

COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by user banned for spamming; no use and out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 04:40, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files in Category:Khoriphaba[edit]

These are historically inaccurate AI generated images of the mythological god Khoriphaba. So the files should be deleted as OOS due to serving no educational purpose what-so-ever.

Adamant1 (talk) 05:03, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete implausible interpretations of ancient mythology Dronebogus (talk) 11:13, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep The artworks were created using numerous explanations in the prompts, for which considerable amount of research in the topic has been done. Merely saying historically inaccurate in a deletionist perspective without understanding anything about the topic, just because it's AI, is really shocking. Regarding scope too, the files are used in numerous projects. Haoreima (talk) 19:18, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Haoreima: The images should at least be slightly plausible and realistic if your going to claim this is all about me an ignorant, AI hating deletionist or whatever. The "numerous explanations" aside, you'd have to at least agree that Khoriphaba clearly wasn't a white Aryan who looks like a modern anime character like he's being portrayed in some of these images. --Adamant1 (talk) 19:25, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Files in Category:Koupalu[edit]

These are historically inaccurate AI generated images of the mythological god Koupalu. So the files should be deleted as OOS due to serving no educational purpose what-so-ever.

Adamant1 (talk) 05:06, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep The artworks were created using numerous explanations in the prompts, for which considerable amount of research in the topic has been done. Merely saying historically inaccurate in a deletionist perspective without understanding anything about the topic, just because it's AI, is really shocking. Regarding scope too, the files are used in numerous projects. Haoreima (talk) 19:16, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Numerous explanations aside, if we're going to host AI generated images of mythological gods they should at least be plausible and Koubru clearly wasn't an Aryan white guy who looked like a modern western cartoon character. It's an insult to Asian folklore to act like these images are at all representative of how Koubru probably looked in traditional depictions of him. --Adamant1 (talk) 19:40, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Please understand what is meant by Aryan look and white people's look first of all. By the way, I am not here for a debate or an argument. I have done considerable research in the very topic about their descriptions reading sacred scriptures. You are free to express your comments but in a calm way. Btw, my comment isn't the final. Haoreima (talk) 19:45, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I'm actually pretty calm about this. So lets make this about me or your perceptions of my emotions. The fact is that Koubru didn't look like a white Aryan cartoon character. Just because you've done considerable research doesn't mean it will be or is reflected in the AI generated images of him. Although if you have evidence of him looking like that in traditional texts be my guest and present it. I'm more then willing to retract this if the images are in fact historically accurate representations. --Adamant1 (talk) 19:59, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Great! I can provide you the books, if you are interested. However, those are written in Indian languages, not in English. Haoreima (talk) 20:14, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I was hopping more for actual images of him from traditional texts. Basing it purely on textual descriptions doesn't work because we don't generally host fantasy amateur artwork. I'd probably fine with this types of images if they were reflective of actual artwork from reliable Tibetan sources though. --Adamant1 (talk) 20:19, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Files in Category:Marjing[edit]

These are historically inaccurate AI generated images of the mythological god Marjing. So the files should be deleted as OOS due to serving no educational purpose what-so-ever.

Adamant1 (talk) 05:09, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep The artworks were created using numerous explanations in the prompts, for which considerable amount of research in the topic has been done. Merely saying historically inaccurate in a deletionist perspective without understanding anything about the topic, just because it's AI, is really shocking. Regarding scope too, the files are used in numerous projects. Haoreima (talk) 19:19, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Files in Category:Korouhanba[edit]

These are historically inaccurate AI generated images of the mythological god Marjing. So the files should be deleted as OOS due to serving no educational purpose what-so-ever.

Adamant1 (talk) 05:11, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Shame there's no prompt specified. In what way are they inaccurate? Belbury (talk) 10:09, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I assume the file names were the prompts. In what way do these images look like the mythological god

Korouhanba? Because there's a few images of him out there and he looks nothing what-so-ever like this guy. --Adamant1 (talk) 10:15, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Numerous descriptions of the deities are mentioned in sacred scriptures, which exist in varying degrees. These descriptions are not always available in the internet. And we do not promote uploading pictures looking similar to ones already present in internet because those already present ones might be copyrighted. And also, please be respectful while commenting regarding religious topics.
  •  Delete fanciful reimagining of mythological figure seemingly made without any historical material, not that an AI can even be trusted to faithfully render such material. Dronebogus (talk) 10:41, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep The artworks were created using numerous explanations in the prompts, for which considerable amount of research in the topic has been done. Merely saying historically inaccurate in a deletionist perspective without understanding anything about the topic, just because it's AI, is really shocking. Regarding scope too, the files are used in numerous projects. Haoreima (talk) 19:25, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


File:इंटरनेटचे-उपयोग-महत्त्व-आणि-फायदे.jpg[edit]

Out of scope: meaningless AI-generated "infographic" full of gibberish ("comminnication", "inforginmon", "soccial work", "glod almoctimg", etc). Omphalographer (talk) 06:10, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Flag of the President of the Confederate States.svg[edit]

This image was nominated for deletion back in 2021 since it's a fictional flag but was kept due to being in use at the time. Although it's not being used anywhere now. So the image should be deleted as OOS. Adamant1 (talk) 06:11, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


File:HeteroFlag.jpg[edit]

This seems to be a user created fictional flag for heterosexuals. So it should be deleted as OOS due to having absolutely no educational value what-so-ever. Commons isn't a personal file host. Adamant1 (talk) 06:15, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete as personal, promotional content per Commons:Deletion requests/Files found with Hetero Flag.png. Omphalographer (talk) 06:24, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
What product is being advertised here, exactly? Trade (talk) 13:55, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


File:Super straight Google Trends 14-Feb to 28 March 2021.jpg[edit]

This image is probably copyrighted due to being taken from Google. So it should be deleted as COPYVIO unless someone can provide evidence to the contrary. Adamant1 (talk) 06:18, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please see "How to use and cite Trends data" at Google Trends support. Thanks, Mathglot (talk) 07:15, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep data and facts, not copyrightable. Dronebogus (talk) 07:42, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I could be wrong but I'm pretty sure the interface of their website and styling of data can both be copyrighted. Even if said data is ultimately just some factual numbers. --Adamant1 (talk) 08:50, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Interface is clearly beneath US TOO. Dronebogus (talk) 10:33, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Dronebogus: I don't necessarily disagree and I probably wouldn't have nominated the image for deletion if it were just of the interface. I think it's above US TOO taken as a whole though and that's usually how it works with images of software. You can't just say a screenshot of a document opened in Microsoft Word is below US TOO because the X in the top corner is to simple to be copyrighted. --Adamant1 (talk) 22:36, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I don’t see a single thing here that passes TOO since it’s all mundane and purely utilitarian. I assume this was auto-generated so even if there’s somehow a “sweat of the brow” clause for producing charts and data visualizations there is no human author to credit. Dronebogus (talk) 08:57, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


File:003 Merging 70X50cm 27,4X19,6.jpg[edit]

Image metadata states the copyright holder is "Peter Polyak". On the site https://www.polyakart.com/ referenced no CC license is mentioned, under which user:Polygo13 has uploaded this painding. 92.117.128.26 06:51, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dr. Daniela Sommer, SPD Fraktion im Hessischen Landtag © Christof Mattes CC BY-SA 4.0.jpg[edit]

Das Foto wurde fälschlicherweise als freigegeben eingestuft. Die abgebildete Person bittet um eine Rücknahme der Veröffentlichung. Daraufhin wurde das Foto wurde von der Ursprungswebsite www.spd-fraktion-hessen.de gelöscht. SPD-Fraktion im Hessischen Landtag (talk) 06:52, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Joel Merkler.png[edit]

Not in the public domain Daehan (talk) 08:13, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Drneki.jpg[edit]

From https://m.famousfix.com/list/indian-psychiatrists with no indication that the image is free to use, therefore for us defaults to copyvio. Also uploader has given no information as to authorship, other than "I made this myself". So if not copyvio, it's an out of scope personal vanity shot of no use to the project. Acabashi (talk) 08:18, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Shot is useful for Wikipedia as it has been used in an article on English Wikipedia “Jaswant Singh Neki”. I have just imported file on commons from English Wikipedia which you rightly say that loader has mentioned made myself. It could also be possible that famousfix itself has used this photo and not the original copyright holder. No doubt subject is a noted psychiatrist doctor and Sikh scholar and material is useful should not be deleted. Guglani (talk) 08:36, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Austria autobahn verbindungsspange rothneusiedl.png[edit]

Not in use - vector version available HLFan (talk) 08:19, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Austria bodenseeschnellstrasse 2005.png[edit]

Not in use - vector version available HLFan (talk) 08:20, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Austria brennerautobahn 2005.png[edit]

Not in use - vector version available HLFan (talk) 08:20, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Austria kremser schnellstrasse 2005.png[edit]

Not in use - vector version available HLFan (talk) 08:21, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Steve's Camaro Cory's GTO (17112684766).jpg[edit]

Image is too out of focus to be of use for Commons Leoboudv (talk) 09:20, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The original on Flickr is actually a video, should that be imported instead or would it still be too low quality? Somegreenguy (talk) 23:24, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tres Hanley 2017 NY Fashion Week.jpg[edit]

Orphan image, article where the image was used, was deleted recently: (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trés Hanley). Delete per COM:NOTUSED (file used in Commons only) and COM:SPAM (self-promotion). Mika1h (talk) 09:22, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files in Category:Superstraight[edit]

All of these images are for a fictional flag having to do with a fake, transphobic sexual orientation that never went anywhere outside of a single online message board. There's no reason we need to host images of fictional flags for every random meme or online message board posting out there. In fact we don't as the upwards of three hundred deletion requests for fictional flags that were deleted in Category:Fictitious symbol related deletion requests/deleted shows. The clear consensus is against hosting these types of images on Commons. So they should be deleted as OOS since they clearly serve absolutely no educational value what-so-ever.

Adamant1 (talk) 09:27, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep to start with, at least one is COM:INUSE. Next, if by “a single message board” you mean /pol/, a very notable board on the very notable website 4chan, then that is enough to both make it marginally notable and notable enough for commons’ extremely low standards. Finally, there is a difference between a made-up thing that originated outside WM and a thing made up one day. This is the former. Dronebogus (talk) 10:29, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The only in use file I saw was being used in a 2 old draft article that clearly isn't going to be put in mainspace anytime soon, if ever. So I don't think the usage is a valid reason to keep the image. As far as the where this orginated from, your correct that 4chan is notable. That obviously doesn't mean every single random thing that gets posted there is notable, eductional, or otherwise worth hosting on Commons though. Files don't get a free pass from Commons:Project scope just because someone might have posted them to 4chan once. --Adamant1 (talk) 10:37, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
File:Super Straight Flag.svg is in extensive use (and if you game the system by going to every single wiki it’s on and removing it you will be reported). You should actually check these things before indiscriminately nominating everything in a category. And I don’t get why you seem to think this is just some random thing that never received any media attention— it’s discussed on the w:/pol/ article of enwiki— I quote, “ Colors associated with ‘super straight’, often used in the form of flags, were black and orange.” (Emphasis mine) It’s also discussed extensively at w:Straight flag, where one of these files is in use. Dronebogus (talk) 10:46, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, I must have missed checking that one. I don't plan on removing it from anywhere and I'd appreciate it if you laid off the needlessly confrontational, accusatory tone about this. Its really not helpful. I explained why I don't think its a thing in the other DR. Plenty of random, benial facts are mentioned in Wikimedia articles. That doesn't make them "things" though, whatever that means. Do you have any evidence of these flags actually beinf IRL or refered to outside of the transphobic angle? If not then at least IMO these images clearly aren't worth keeping. Although their eductional usefulness would still be questionable regardless. But actual usage of the flags IRL would at least be better then your claim that they should be kept simply "because 4chan." --Adamant1 (talk) 11:01, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You are living in some kind of alternate universe where a pride flag must be used in real life by some kind of legitimate sexual or gender minority to be in-scope. I have literally presented extensive evidence that these are non-trivially COM:INUSE and you just keep repeating the same arguments over and over when they have nothing to do with what I just said. Dronebogus (talk) 11:06, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Are you really going to argue this is at all comparable to the pride flag? Come on. You know they aren't at all comparable to each other. Regardless, just because one image is in use doesn't automatically mean the other 9 images I nominated for deletion should be kept. You clearly have no actual arguement for keeping the imaged outside of making bad faithed, personal accusations though. I hear what your saying perfectly fine. I just think your wrong. Get over it and spare me the defense bad attitude about this. There's really no need for it. --Adamant1 (talk) 11:18, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
“If superstraight isn’t a pride flag then you must delete” isn’t a coherent argument. I really don’t care what happens to the unused ones as long as the ones that are actually being legitimately used are kept. That’s literally all I’m vouching for here. Dronebogus (talk) 11:23, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Good thing none of the reasons I said the images should be deleted have anything to do with the pride flag then. Your the one who brought it up to begin with. The only noncoherent argument here is you bringing up the pride flag and then treating me like it has anything to do with why I think the images should be deleted. "the Chewbacca defense is a legal strategy in which a criminal defense lawyer tries to confuse the jury rather than refute the case of the prosecutor. It is an intentional distraction or obfuscation." That's literally all you've been doing. I guess there's nothing more to say about it if you don't care about the unused files being deleted though. Although I think the one that's in use should be deleted to, but I'm more then willing to leave it up to whomever closes this. Maybe drop it on your end going forward in the meantime. --Adamant1 (talk) 11:31, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I’m still completely baffled about why you think your reasons to delete make any sense whatsoever, but I’m more baffled by your resistance to acknowledging COM:INUSE applies to File:Super Straight Flag.svg and multiple others. Dronebogus (talk) 11:37, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Since your apparently incapable of dropping this for some reason how exaxtly is me saying I just missed that the one file was being used in a Wikipedia article not an acknowlegement of COM:INUSE? With the other file, I could be wrong but I thought COM:INUSE didn't apply in cases were the image is being used on a draft article that has essentially no chance of ever being put into mainspace. The standard here isn't just "use" after all. There's also "realistic utility" and that's kind of negated by it being used in a draft article that's been stalled out for multiple years. --Adamant1 (talk) 11:45, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
If you want to convince me that you actually understand what INUSE is, just remove File:Super Straight Flag.svg, please. Dronebogus (talk) 11:49, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I'll remove it if you promise not to come in so hot about things next time ;) --Adamant1 (talk) 12:09, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Deal Dronebogus (talk) 12:11, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I just looked and most of them aren't being used. One file File:Super Straight Flag.png is being used in a draft that's been there for 2 years and I'm pretty sure we delete images in that case since it doesn't have "realistic utility" at that point. Then there's a couple of random uses with other files in bot galleries, which again, doesn't meet the whole ""realistic utility" thing. That's all the usage I can find though. So can you point out which file is used in at least 13 pages across all projects since I'm not seeing it on my end for some reason? --Adamant1 (talk) 22:23, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep COM:INUSE Prototyperspective (talk) 15:42, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


File:Main Building of University of Computer Studies (Myeik).png[edit]

claim as own work, photo is from university's website (Direct link) NinjaStrikers «» 09:54, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Valenzuela400 (talk · contribs)[edit]

Some post-1972 works of architectures in the Philippines, not eligible for {{PD-Philippines-FoP work}}. Furthermore, the uploader seems to exhibit Judgefloro (talk · contribs)-like uploading habit.

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 09:56, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


File:Consumer reports 02 86.jpg[edit]

Not public domain — this is a page from a 1986 issue of Consumer Reports. Trivialist (talk) 10:03, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Haimen Ekiben.jpg[edit]

Very low resolution and the fact that a nearly identically named image uploaded by the same user was speedied as a copyvio suggest this probably isn’t own work Dronebogus (talk) 10:10, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Max Liebermann Liebesszene.jpg[edit]

Not PD in the US Dronebogus (talk) 10:15, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Why? The work was created around 1926, and in the US no works seems not to be copyrighted that were created before 1929.
Commons:URAA-restored copyrights#Preliminary tests Paradise Chronicle (talk) 13:04, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


File:Promises of Izumo.jpg[edit]

Low quality version of File:Couple standing in shallow water by Terasaki Kogyo.jpg Dronebogus (talk) 10:18, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bath City squad in 1916 during ww1.jpg[edit]

Poor quality image that I should't have uploaded, heavily edited and messed around with it Joseph1891 (talk) 10:26, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bath City at The Belvoir Castle Ground in 1914.jpg[edit]

Really bad quality image that I uploaded, For some reason when I uploaded it I photoshoped it heavily and changed some parts of the image to make it appear clearer and smoother but its just looks bad. Should be deleted. Joseph1891 (talk) 10:28, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:SZ 深圳 Shenzhen 福田 Futian 孖嶺站 Maling Metro Station map sign May 2024 R12S 01.jpg[edit]

Copyrighted maps in China. Solomon203 (talk) 10:42, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:SZ 深圳 Shenzhen 福田 Futian 孖嶺站 Maling Metro Station map sign May 2024 R12S 08.jpg[edit]

Copyrighted maps in China. Solomon203 (talk) 10:42, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:SZ 深圳 Shenzhen 福田 Futian 孖嶺站 Maling Metro Station map sign n B C D E exit signs May 2024 R12S.jpg[edit]

Copyrighted maps in China. Solomon203 (talk) 10:42, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:SZ 深圳 Shenzhen 龍崗 Longgang 吉華路 Jihua Road 坂田北站 Bantian North Station floor plan sign May 2024 R12S 08.jpg[edit]

Copyrighted maps in China. Solomon203 (talk) 10:44, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:SZ 深圳 Shenzhen 龍崗 Longgang 吉華路 Jihua Road 坂田北站 Bantian North Station map sign May 2024 R12S 09.jpg[edit]

Copyrighted maps in China. Solomon203 (talk) 10:44, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:SZ 深圳 Shenzhen 龍崗 Longgang 星河 Galaxy Coco Park mall 客戶服務處 service counter intro sign May 2024 R12S.jpg[edit]

Copyrighted poster in China. Solomon203 (talk) 10:46, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:SZ 深圳 Shenzhen 龍崗 Longgang 星河 Galaxy Coco Park mall sign May 2024 R12S 04.jpg[edit]

Copyrighted maps in China. Solomon203 (talk) 10:46, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:SZ 深圳 Shenzhen 龍崗 Longgang 星河 Galaxy Coco Park mall sign May 2024 R12S 03.jpg[edit]

Copyrighted maps in China. Solomon203 (talk) 10:46, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:SZ 深圳 Shenzhen 龍崗 Longgang 雅寶站 Yabao Metro Station map sign May 2024 R12S 02.jpg[edit]

Copyrighted maps in China. Solomon203 (talk) 10:46, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:SZ 深圳 Shenzhen 龍崗 Longgang 雅寶站 Yabao Metro Station Smartphone ads Harmony OS May 2024 R12S 01.jpg[edit]

Copyrighted poster of Huawei. Solomon203 (talk) 10:47, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:SZ 深圳 Shenzhen 龍崗 Longgang Metro 光雅園站 GuangYaYuan Station floor plan sign May 2024 R12S 02.jpg[edit]

Copyrighted maps in China. Solomon203 (talk) 10:47, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:SZ 深圳 Shenzhen 龍崗 Longgang Metro 光雅園站 GuangYaYuan Station map sign May 2024 R12S 01.jpg[edit]

Copyrighted maps in China. Solomon203 (talk) 10:48, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Bath city at Lambridge 1919.png[edit]

This file was initially tagged by Krashaon19 as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Poorer quality duplicate, will not be used on Wikipedia, and will likely never be used on any related Bath City F.C. article. Yann (talk) 12:55, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep Properly licensed and we are past courtesy deletion period. The other version is a different file type. We keep both, pngs make poorer thumbnails but use less compression. --RAN (talk) 19:11, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per RAN. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 13:14, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Bath city at Lambridge 1919.png[edit]

This a redundant and low quality image that bloats commons, it will likely never be used in any Bath City related articles. Bathwelshman19 (talk) 13:42, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per previous listing. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 14:37, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bath city at Lambridge 1919.png[edit]

Poor quality image that I uploaded. Stupidly, I heavily altered and even drew some parts of the image in editing software's. Should be deleted. Joseph1891 (talk) 10:48, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:SZ 深圳 Shenzhen 龍崗 Longgang Metro 光雅園站 GuangYaYuan Station map sign Wuhe Blvd May 2024 R12S 01.jpg[edit]

Copyrighted maps in China. Solomon203 (talk) 10:48, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:SZ 深圳 Shenzhen 龍崗 Longgang Metro map sign Wuhe Blvd Bantian North Station n Wuhe Station May 2024 R12S.jpg[edit]

Copyrighted maps in China. Solomon203 (talk) 10:49, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:BJ 北京首都國際機場 Beijing Capital International Airport BCIA location map directory sign Floorplan Aug-2010 You Are Here.JPG[edit]

Copyrighted maps in China. Solomon203 (talk) 10:49, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:SZ 深圳市 Shenzhen 福田區 Futian District 上梅林站 Metro Shangmeilin Station map sign May 2024 R12S 08.jpg[edit]

Copyrighted maps in China. Solomon203 (talk) 10:49, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:SZ 深圳市 Shenzhen 福田區 Futian District 上梅林站 Metro Shangmeilin Station map sign May 2024 R12S 09.jpg[edit]

Copyrighted maps in China. Solomon203 (talk) 10:49, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files in Category:Files by Wikivoyage user Luchs[edit]

No evidence of permission: all links to uploader and sourcefile are dead

A.Savin 11:10, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep There is just as much evidence here as there is if you or anyone upload a file to Commons and write "own work". When Wikivoyage was introduced as a member of the Wikimedia community thousands of old files were transferred from the old website to Commons. It was transferred with a bot and it copied all the information from that website to Commons. Just like if it was copied from Wikipedia to Commons. --MGA73 (talk) 13:08, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Ping User:Multichill and User:Magog the Ogre. Magog helped clean up files from Wikivoyage after the transfer. Multichill untroduced me to the Pywikipedia bot that could move files to Commons. Both have transferred files to Commons with a bot. --MGA73 (talk) 13:15, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep absolutely no reason to doubt the orginal upload logs. Multichill (talk) 15:17, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep these images were on Wikivoyage which was its own project before merging into Wikimedia. The project was shut down after all images were transferred to Commons. MGA73 and I personally went and reviewed each of them. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 22:55, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Taide - panoramio.jpg[edit]

Dervative work of Finnish sculptor Matti Mönkäre. Sculpture Ahjo ("Furnace") unveiled in 1981. No Freedom of panorama in Finland for sculptures, not in PD. Htm (talk) 11:35, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


File:Aluminium cyanide.png[edit]

This compound is not ionic wih all the anions clustered, but instead has a definite octahedral-center framework (doi:10.1006/jssc.2001.9192). The typography of the minus-signs masking part of one of the three bonds in each is also distracting). DMacks (talk) 11:36, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete, also delete File:Ytterbium(III) cyanide.png for the same typographic reason. Perhaps File:Prussian-blue-simplified-motif-from-xtal-xray-3D-bs-17.png can be the replacement for Al(CN)3, as they both have a similar structure. Nucleus hydro elemon (talk) 14:39, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Agree with both comments. User:Mfernflower disagrees about use of the prussian-blue image in the infobox. DMacks (talk) 05:51, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pyrkon 2015 06.jpg[edit]

Arguably out of scope. Low quality photo of two unidentified people, according to description attending a sf convention in Poland - but nothing related to the event can be identified in the background. This photo has next to no educational or encyclopedic value, it is pretty much a selfie of two random people. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 12:24, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tuxedowhereareyou!?.jpg[edit]

out of scope: Commons is not the platform for "who has seen my pet" searches Enyavar (talk) 12:53, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I apologise for making it seem like I was looking for tuxedo and needed help finding him on Wikipedia XD. As it turns out, I uploaded it for my user page. I named the file that way because I was missing my boy. But, hes been lost for months now and we have concluded his death. So, it was not meant to be a search for a lost pet, and now we have given up. It was meant to be used on my user page. Jayson (talk) 13:18, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
recategorized as user page image,  I withdraw my nomination --Enyavar (talk) 14:58, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Foto Francisco Savio.jpg[edit]

wrong date, wrong author, wrong source... Xocolatl (talk) 13:03, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Parswa Debadevi of Swapneswar Temple Kendusahi.jpg[edit]

potential copyvio and entirely unusable due to multiple unnecessary watermarks Psubhashish (talk) 13:05, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Grosseto calcio.jpg[edit]

copyright violation and duplicate Alienautic (talk) 13:04, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Setnickij n a.jpg[edit]

wrong date, no source link Xocolatl (talk) 13:05, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mila Schiavo.jpg[edit]

wrong author, copyright violation, see metadata Xocolatl (talk) 13:06, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:เพลงมาร์ชโรงเรียนองค์การบริหารส่วนจังหวัดกระบี่.jpg[edit]

I, as an uploader and had no experience at that time, found that this picture is not for uploading as my own work. I apologize for my mistake. I have found out a long time ago but not remember that I still have some pictures to get them removed. Pakorn Wongaroon (talk) 13:08, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by 完颜吴乞买 (talk · contribs)[edit]

Out of scope and unsourced: Maps used to promote revisionist history based on dubious sources. The land in the crudely redlined areas is not "gone" or "missing" (the maps even show it as land), it was just determined by historians (on whose research the original maps are based on) to have not been under direct rule of the Tang dynasty back in the day.

Enyavar (talk) 13:09, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by 完颜吴乞买 (talk · contribs)[edit]

Suspected CopyVio: Satellite images are generally implausible as "own work"; so this is at best a screenshot of an undisclosed free satellite image which needs to be named. Otherwise, CopyVio.

Enyavar (talk) 13:34, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:โลโก้ทรู 5G.png[edit]

I, as an uploader and had no experience at that time, found that this picture is not for uploading as my own work. I apologize for my mistake. I have found out a long time ago but not remember that I still have some pictures to get them removed. (เดืมทีสับสนระหว่างเนื้อหาเสรี และเนื้อหาไม่เสรี จึงอัปโหลดไฟล์ของผู้อื่นลง wikimedia commons ซึ่งส่วนมาก ผมจะอ้างอิงตลอด แต่ใช้วิกิมานานแล้วพบว่ามันไม่ได้ทำแบบนั้น แล้วเพิ่งนึกออกว่ายังมีไฟล์ที่ยังไม่ลบ) Pakorn Wongaroon (talk) 13:10, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Anubankrabi school.jpg[edit]

I, as an uploader and had no experience at that time, found that this picture is not for uploading as my own work. I apologize for my mistake. I have found out a long time ago but not remember that I still have some pictures to get them removed. (ไม่ใช่ผลงานตัวเอง เกิดความสับสนระหว่างเนื้อหาเสรีกับเนื้อหาไม่เสรี เมื่อตอนเข้าวิกิใหม่ ๆ) Pakorn Wongaroon (talk) 13:11, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Филарет.jpg[edit]

probably wrong author, date, source Xocolatl (talk) 13:14, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep. Obviously in the public domain, no reason to delete, please just slap on a {{Wrong license}} in the file description for now Nutshinou Talk! 18:59, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:1 Spesmilo.jpg[edit]

Superseded by .PNG: File:1_Spesmilo.png. All .jpg instances changed to .png, no longer used on Wikis. I am the copyright holder and consent with the deletion of the file. Fouky (talk) 13:21, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:1 Stelo.jpg[edit]

Superseded by .PNG: File:1_Stelo.png. All .jpg instances changed to .png, no longer used on Wikis. I am the copyright holder and consent with the deletion of the file. Fouky (talk) 13:22, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:5 Steloj.jpg[edit]

Superseded by .PNG: File:5_Steloj.png. All .jpg instances changed to .png, no longer used on Wikis. I am the copyright holder and consent with the deletion of the file. Fouky (talk) 13:23, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:10 Steloj.jpg[edit]

Superseded by .PNG: File:10_Steloj.png. All .jpg instances changed to .png, no longer used on Wikis. I am the copyright holder and consent with the deletion of the file. Fouky (talk) 13:24, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:25 Steloj Ag.jpg[edit]

Superseded by .PNG: File:25_Steloj_Ag.png. All .jpg instances changed to .png, no longer used on Wikis. I am the copyright holder and consent with the deletion of the file. Fouky (talk) 13:25, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:25 Steloj Cu-Ni.jpg[edit]

Superseded by .PNG: File:25_Steloj_Cu-Ni.png. All .jpg instances changed to .png, no longer used on Wikis. I am the copyright holder and consent with the deletion of the file. Fouky (talk) 13:26, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:25 Steloj Au.jpg[edit]

Superseded by .PNG: File:25_Steloj_Au.png. All .jpg instances changed to .png, no longer used on Wikis. I am the copyright holder and consent with the deletion of the file. Fouky (talk) 13:27, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files in Category:KaZantip, 2008[edit]

Personal/Private photo. COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST.

Mitte27 (talk) 13:55, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Judge Isaac Parker Fort Smith AR.jpg[edit]

 Delete No freedom of panorama in the U.S. for 3D works of art. No indication the rights of the image are available under a license compatible with Commons. Copyright violation. Hammersoft (talk) 14:07, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by NordMaps (talk · contribs)[edit]

Suspected CopyVio: Uploader declared unsourced satellite images as "own work" - Sources (like Landsat) need to be stated, and if it's just GoogleMaps, it needs to get deleted.

Enyavar (talk) 14:09, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Flag of Germany.png[edit]

Duplicate of File:Flag of Germany.svg. Fry1989 eh? 14:09, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Flag of Italian Country.png[edit]

Duplicate of File:Flag of Italy.svg. Fry1989 eh? 14:10, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:2014 İstanbul LGBT Pride (58).jpg[edit]

Exif and file size imply it's not own work but taken from somewhere else. 186.174.134.132 14:25, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Yamira Xiomara (talk · contribs)[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons:What Commons is not#Wikimedia Commons is not your personal free web host. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:41, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Feliijotapege (talk · contribs)[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons:What Commons is not#Wikimedia Commons is not your personal free web host. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:42, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by PottyBot (talk · contribs)[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused logos.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:44, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Billy Mok.2014 (talk · contribs)[edit]

unlikely to be own work

Didym (talk) 05:00, 9 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:19, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Billy Mok.2014 (talk · contribs)[edit]

This group of images are claimed to be copied from a website, however the website has no drawings or illustrations on it only text. This uploader has been blocked for uploading copyrighted images. This series of poor quality black and white logos look like they were photocopied and faxed two or three times prior to upload. Even if these are the logos of these various outfits, surely better quality ones could be provided than this group of tiny, blurry, poor quality images.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:56, 23 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Kept, so this is not a question of copyright, but a question of scope. As all those files are used, they are apparently in scope. Taivo (talk) 08:34, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Billy Mok.2014 (talk · contribs)[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagrams and logos.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:57, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files in Category:Wonka (film)[edit]

These photos show miniature versions of movie posters, therefore these are derived works. And we need permission of all production companies, which we most likely will never get

Mbch331 (talk) 15:12, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by WalterKlaus3 (talk · contribs)[edit]

Flickrwashing. The source flickr account was created on March 2023 and the about on flickr shows it is "walterklaus315", a similar user name a the uploader. March 2023 is also when this editor created an article on Danny Lauter on the English Wikipedia. The photostream has images with varying EXIF information crediting different copyright holders, none of which are the uploader. Also has a history of copyright violations.

Whpq (talk) 15:23, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Nokian taistelu (Nuija sota 1596 - panoramio.jpg[edit]

URAA-case. Derivative work of Finnish sculptor Gabriel Engberg (Wikidata:Q5711671). Engberg died in 1953. Memorial to Battle of Nokia was unveiled in 1933. It was copyright protected in Finland at Uraa-date (1996-01-01). Because of URAA restored copyright this memorial is copyright protected in United States until 2029-01-01. There is no freedom of panorama for sculptures in Finland. Htm (talk) 16:01, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


File:Tay kewei.jpg[edit]

Likely not own work, small crop of unknown source with transmission code in EXIF data. P 1 9 9   16:04, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Jan-Joosten-van Lodensteyn-and-William-Adams-with-Ship-Liefde-first-encounter-in-Kyushu-Japan-1600.png[edit]

This seems like a modern painting of historical event. Likely no in PD Jarekt (talk) 16:13, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:SMWsolr-small.png[edit]

No evidence this nontrivial logo is available under the claimed license - the license of the code of an extension does not necessarily apply to its logo * Pppery * it has begun... 16:32, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment: I have no problem with anyone wanting to push this back on the MediaWiki wiki where it came from. —Uzume (talk) 16:57, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That doesn't help if there's a licensing problem. * Pppery * it has begun... 19:13, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Draykaay.jpg[edit]

out of scope, possible promotional content CoffeeEngineer (talk) 16:34, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Uzume (talk · contribs)[edit]

Screenshots of mw:Extension:FCKeditor (by Mafs) which has been abandoned for over a decade. Out of scope, and also derivative works of the drawing in the center, of which we have no idea of the license.

* Pppery * it has begun... 16:35, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment: I have no problem with anyone wanting to push these back on the MediaWiki wiki where they came from. —Uzume (talk) 16:57, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
They should be nowhere IMO - they're out of both wikis' scope, in addition the licensing issue. * Pppery * it has begun... 19:12, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Akt z gramofonem by Wacław Palessa (1931).jpg[edit]

Still copyrighted. Painter Wacław Palessa died in 1976. Botev (talk) 16:46, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This painting is state owned (The Szczecin National Museum) and it is in public domain. Oleo (talk) 05:10, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The fact that the painting itself is state-owned doesn't mean that it is in public domain. Do we have any evidence that it was somehow released to the public domain by its author? --Botev (talk) 08:45, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Probably, you`re right. But using royal we? That makes me laugh. Oleo (talk) 10:48, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
On the contrary, that was pluralis modestiae. --Botev (talk) 19:24, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Chyba jest Pan fajnym gościem i raczej Pana polubię. Pozdrawiam. Oleo (talk) 05:28, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:FSO na Żeraniu by Wacław Palessa (1952).jpg[edit]

Still copyrighted. Painter Wacław Palessa died in 1976. Botev (talk) 16:47, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This state published postcard comprises the state owned painting/image (The Warsaw Museum) which is in public domain. Oleo (talk) 05:16, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The fact that the state published it as a postcard doesn't mean it's not copyrighted. Although photographs published prior to 1994 may qualify as {{PD-Polish}}, this is not a photograph but a painting. So no - still no evidence of copyright-free status. --Botev (talk) 08:50, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
So delete it. I don`t care. Oleo (talk) 11:04, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:RiAFAr1zaGY.jpg[edit]

This file was initially tagged by Ahri.boy as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: Out of scope, just some text: Not a valid SD criterion, file is currently in use. —Matrix(!) {user - talk? - uselesscontributions} 16:54, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The draft article in enwiki is already deleted as it is unambiguous advertising. I tagged the photo as Out of scope.  Speedy delete as it contains only some text that is considered an advertisement Ahri.boy (talk) 21:24, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:La Mort du Cygne 1 Anna Pavlova 2 Yvette Chauvire 3 Natalia Makarova.mpg.GIF[edit]

Derivative of 3 videos (the latter one is of 1970s), sources are missing, copyright status is unclear. Quick1984 (talk) 17:03, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:La Mort du Cygne 1 Anna Pavlova 2 Yvette Chauvire 3 Natalia Makarova..mpg.ogv[edit]

Derivative of 3 videos (the latter one is of 1970s), sources are missing, copyright status is unclear. Quick1984 (talk) 17:05, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ekaterina Maksimova Fouette.mpg.ogv[edit]

Derivative of the video of 1970s, source is missing, copyright status is unclear. Quick1984 (talk) 17:06, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:La Mort du Cygne 1 Anna Pavlova 2 Yvette Chauvire 3 Natalia Makarova.mpg.ogv[edit]

Derivative of 3 videos (the latter one is of 1970s), sources are missing, copyright status is unclear. Quick1984 (talk) 17:21, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Le Corsaire Drigo Adajio Debut enregistrement spectacle.ogg[edit]

As per description, Recorded in 2011 during a rehearsal with the ballet orchestra. Performers' copyright status is unclear. Quick1984 (talk) 17:24, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Le Corsaire Adan Danse enregistrement spectacle Forban.ogg[edit]

As per description, Recorded in 2010 during a rehearsal with the ballet orchestra. Performers' copyright status is unclear. Quick1984 (talk) 17:25, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mravinsky Valse in Serenade.ogg[edit]

The perfomer, Yevgeny Aleksandrovich Mravinsky, died in 1988. Quick1984 (talk) 17:26, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Slepaya Yakobson Music Manuel M. Ponce 0.35.ogg[edit]

The performer, Leonid Veniaminovich Yakobson, died in 1975. Quick1984 (talk) 17:28, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:131117 jumex def 121.jpg[edit]

Uncertain why uploader would have rights to license. Author and copyright holder "Moritz Bernoully" per EXIF. Reverse image search shows multiple versions on line more than 2 years before Commons upload. Note: Currently in use, but we have multiple good alterative images of this building. Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:05, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ugartsberg f.png[edit]

suspected CopyVio: satellite image claimed as own source Enyavar (talk) 18:06, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Saving Mango - A Cat's Story (Promotional Material).jpg[edit]

This file was initially tagged by Günther Frager as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Photo by Oren Peled - © All rights reserved Yann (talk) 18:17, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello
My name is Oren Peled and I am the owner of the rights to the photo you wish to delete. I am the one who uploaded the photo to Wikipedia (it is a page that provides information about an English-speaking Israeli film I made - you can get more details about it on SAVINGMANGO.COM). I am aware of the importance of copyright and respect it, and it is important for me to emphasize that I am the owner of the rights to this image.
I will be more then happy to prove it in any way that needed.
Thank you
Oren ORENPELED (talk) 20:14, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Marizza liechtenstein 1923 2.png[edit]

This file was initially tagged by Alabasterstein as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: no permission visible, see: https://jqadams.art/werke/marizza-liechtenstein-1923 Yann (talk) 18:20, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sprout logo.svg[edit]

Complex logo, surpasses threshold of originality. The blue part is text-only, but the green leaf is complex. 66.65.58.236 18:20, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:خىمغ.jpg[edit]

Personal photo for non-Wikipedian. Out of scope Mohammdaon (talk) 18:21, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:دكتور عمر مشهور الجازي.jpg[edit]

Personal photo for non-Wikipedian. Out of scope Mohammdaon (talk) 18:21, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:رانده سعيد.jpg[edit]

Personal photo for non-Wikipedian. Out of scope Mohammdaon (talk) 18:22, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:عبدالله بن راشد الخالدي4.jpg[edit]

Personal photo for non-Wikipedian. Out of scope Mohammdaon (talk) 18:22, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:عبدالله بن راشد الخالدي1.jpg[edit]

Personal photo for non-Wikipedian. Out of scope Mohammdaon (talk) 18:23, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:عبدالله بن راشد الخالدي2.jpg[edit]

Personal photo for non-Wikipedian. Out of scope Mohammdaon (talk) 18:23, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:عبدالله بن راشد الخالدي3.jpg[edit]

Personal photo for non-Wikipedian. Out of scope Mohammdaon (talk) 18:23, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:القمرh.jpg[edit]

Personal photo for non-Wikipedian. Out of scope Mohammdaon (talk) 18:25, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:المعز الفاطمى 2024.jpg[edit]

Personal photo for non-Wikipedian. Out of scope Mohammdaon (talk) 18:25, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:ثفتا.png[edit]

Personal photo for non-Wikipedian. Out of scope Mohammdaon (talk) 18:26, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:“Medieval Agsu City” State Historical-Cultural Reserve.pdf[edit]

Out of scope / copyvio: plain text, possibly copied from a copyrighted book Omphalographer (talk) 18:32, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Baptiste Garcia.jpg[edit]

Trabajo propio? 186.174.69.38 18:54, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I own the rights to the work and took the photo. 82.7.63.119 20:20, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It’s perfectly fine for it to be on Wikipedia and has been considered “in the public domain” for such purposes by me 82.7.63.119 20:21, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Vd? 186.174.69.38 20:28, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Basistov-ag.jpg[edit]

Unlikely to be own work. It's a derivative work of a photograph by an unknown author from a family archive. Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 18:55, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Logo manggarai timur.png[edit]

Logo no simple 186.174.69.38 18:58, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:TGU1910b.jpg[edit]

This file was initially tagged by Figure19 as duplicate (duplicate) and the most recent rationale was: 040 Томск Императорский томский университет (cropped).jpg. Not an exact COM:DUPE, but requested by uploader. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:17, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Now I have doubts upon which image is primary, so I'm withdrawing my request.  Keep --Figure19 (talk) 17:40, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:1910 07872 comice à Vitry.jpg[edit]

1910 French postcard, author appears to be "M. B, edit. a Vitry-le-Francois". Not an anonymous work, but too young for PD-old-assumed. Abzeronow (talk) 19:23, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Anatoly Berezin (cropped).jpg[edit]

Insufficient or doubtful author and license. It's a derivative work of a photograph by an unknown author from a family archive. Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 19:27, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Deniz koncert.jpg[edit]

Upload por un violador de derechos de autor 186.174.69.38 19:43, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image represents me and I own the rights to the image Denizemszi (talk) 19:46, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Como lo va a demostrar? 186.174.69.38 19:51, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
My name is Rizner Dénes nickname: Deniz. This is my facebook page: https://www.facebook.com/deniz.official and my website: https://deniz.hu Denizemszi (talk) 09:00, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Albert MOGHOMAYE.jpg[edit]

copy of linkedin https://fr.linkedin.com/posts/albert-moghomaye-b028115_%C3%A9nergie-assurance-opportunit%C3%A9-activity-6997851459765555200-3O-R?trk=public_profile_like_view Habertix (talk) 19:59, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gadd.jpg[edit]

Copyright violation - the creator of this photograph (Pip - bypip.co.uk) has not given permission for the use of this photograph. Photograph was taken from an article by The Times. https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/richard-gadd-i-was-stalked-for-four-years-8r2vdpd9r TheGoodEndedHappily (talk) 20:23, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Support Per the nominator. Mondo (talk) 20:27, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Visucreativ (talk · contribs)[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:46, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 05:22, 12 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Visucreativ (talk · contribs)[edit]

Self-published ebooks, likely not in COM:SCOPE.

Günther Frager (talk) 20:39, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Weak delete. Applying Google Translate to the file descriptions suggests that these are indeed out of scope, but it'd be nice if someone who knows Tamil could take a look at the contents and confirm that. Omphalographer (talk) 20:46, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:2019 Cerimônia de entrega habitacional do Residencial Quinta dos Paricás.jpg[edit]

Copyrighted artworks. RodRabelo7 (talk) 20:59, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Olive34830 (talk · contribs)[edit]

There is no freedom of panorama in France.

Günther Frager (talk) 21:09, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


File:Πολεοδομικό Σχέδιο - Φυλακές Κορυδαλλού, 3 Οκτωμβρίου 1960 01.jpg[edit]

This file was initially tagged by Günther Frager as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: The source link states: © Copyright 2022-2024 Εθνικό Τυπογραφείο - Δ/νση Ζ Πληροφορικής . All Rights Reserved. Converted to DR to allow discussions. Günther Frager (talk) 21:29, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Сторгозия Плевен.png[edit]

GoogleMaps CopyVio Enyavar (talk) 23:03, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Сэвид.jpg[edit]

Out of scope: Personal fantasy Enyavar (talk) 23:25, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Спутниковая карта. П. Карповский.png[edit]

suspected YandexMaps CopyVio Enyavar (talk) 23:30, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files found with Special:Search/Turkiskauppiaat[edit]

These Panoramio imports depict Turkiskauppiaat (authored by sculptor Ossi Somma[1] who died in 2020[2]) in a non-incidental or intentional manner (that is, the sculpture is the important element in these Panoramio images). As there is no commercial Freedom of Panorama in Finland for public art, these Panoramio imports infringe the late sculptor's posthumous copyright.

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 23:31, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Files in Category:Walt Disney World Resort in 2008[edit]

I feel like these standee photo-spots would violate c:COM:FOP US.

(Oinkers42) (talk) 23:31, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Jacque.jpg[edit]

Unlikely to be own work, and there is no evidence that this is a free photo. Tineye is displaying results from w:The Exterminating Angel which is still copyrighted. FlyingAce (talk) 23:39, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files found with Special:Search/Harri Hedman Ossi[edit]

These Panoramio imports from a Panoramio photographer all depict various artistic works made by Ossi Somma (died 2020). The Panoramio photographer claims on his website that there was a permission from the sculptor (the images date to 2012); however, it is just a blanket statement that cannot be ascertained – if the permission is only confined to photography or if it extends to publication on Panoramio under commercial CC licensing. Finland has no commercial Freedom of Panorama for public art.

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 23:48, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]