Commons:Deletion requests/2024/05/08

7 May 2024

9 May 2024

Deletion requests on 8 May 2024

May 8[edit]

Files uploaded by Eacorlor (talk · contribs)[edit]

Uploader's random personal fantasy art - out of scope

The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:13, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per COM:NOTWEBHOST David Fuchs (talk) 17:31, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Triângulo.jpg[edit]

Random personal AI image (logo)? Out of scope. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:16, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. No conceivable educational use. Omphalographer (talk) 00:54, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:My english teacher who likes weezer.jpg[edit]

small, blurry photo of unidentified person Krok6kola (talk) 01:17, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No conceivable use, out of scope. grendel|khan 08:29, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Metrolink icon small.png[edit]

unused, vague, not educational icon. Lemonaka (talk) 01:48, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete redundant & low quality: We have already File:Metrolink icon 2022.svg. --Achim55 (talk) 19:15, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. Bedivere (talk) 22:01, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete It appears (based on the discussion at en:WP:HD#Updating a symbol used in an infobox) that the uploader was trying to create an updated version of File:Metrolink icon.svg for use in various English Wikipedia templates. This appears to have been done using File:Metrolink Icon 2022.png, which is much better in quality (though the file's license and description probably needs tweaking); so, this file is no longer really needed. -- Marchjuly (talk) 01:12, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:CFC Media Lab's Pearl Chen, Patrick Naval, Aylwin Lo, Jacqueline Nuwame, Ana Serrano, Leonardo Dell'Anno and Andrea Mallozzi at the Bata shoe museum (6210871503).jpg[edit]

As one of the individuals captured in this photo, I did not consent to its release online. [[Special:Contributions/North6318 (talk) 00:09, 14 May 2024 (UTC)|North6318 (talk) 00:09, 14 May 2024 (UTC)]] 01:55, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

First, {{Flickrreview}} confirmed that this image was properly licensed, almost 9 years ago.
Note: The Canadian film centre released over 6,000 photos taken at its events, during the early 21st century. This image, like the other 6,000 images, was taken at an event organized by the CFC. The individuals invited to these events knew that designated photographers were circulating at these events. I suggest that agreeing to pose for a photo taken by one of the CFC's photographers indicated the invitee's consent for the CFC to do whatever it wanted with the photos, including releasing it under a license that allowed the WMF to make use of it for educational purposes.
Second, User:North6318 (talk) 00:09, 14 May 2024 (UTC), the WMF commons, and other WMF projects, do make provisions for people to request the deletion of properly licensed images. We do so as a courtesy. Its discretionary. If you consider your request to be serious, please:[reply]

Send an email to the committee of trusted volunteers who confidentially confirm the real world identities of outsiders like yourself. We should never delete material based on an anonymous request. permissions-commonswikimedia.org
I recommend you offer a meaningful explanation for this image's deletion. This image has been viewed 2000 times, since it was uploaded here. This represents considerable effort on the part of the projects volunteers. Your explanation for your deletion request should be significant enough to justify ignoring the efforts volunteers made in the uploading and curation of this image.
If the real reason for your deletion request is, well, no offense, simple vanity, your request is most likely to win approval if you honestly own up to this.
You could upload a superior image. Go to the Barber or hair-dresser, take a selfie of yourself that you think is superior to this image. Upload it, using what we consider a "free" license.
User:North6318 (talk) 00:09, 14 May 2024 (UTC), at this point some people who are making a request for courtesy deletion get anxious, feel confused, because they want to know what they should do to make sure they can guarantee the image that triggered their concern gets deleted.[reply]
There is no guarantee. You are requesting this properly licensed image's deletion as a courtesy - a favor. The success of your request rests on the strength of your request. Everyone here is supposed to be courteous. We are supposed to be courteous to you. And this courtesy rule applies to you too. So, make sure you remain courteous during this discussion.
Note: if you upload an additional image, that selfie I recommended above, any WMF member who writes about you, and wants to use an image of you, will choose the best image of you. So, if your selfie is a good image, you can trust that that is the one that will be used. Geo Swan (talk) 09:01, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
What if the reason you want the image deleted ISN'T vanity? Over the years I have thought about the other reasons someone might prefer we delete an image of themselves. Alternative reason have included...
1. Since this image was taken I observed a serious crime, and I am now in an official witness protection program, and I request a courtesy deletion to help protect my safety...
2. Since this image was taken I have undergone a religious conversion. I am now a member of a church that believes cameras capture an individual's soul, and I request courtesy deletion so I can comply with my church's doctrine...
3. Since this image was taken I have developed a serious case of body dismorphia. Images of my own body make me ill, and my therapist has written a letter, to you, and everyone else who has an image of me, requesting you delete it to help protect my mental health...

If an individual finds the reason for their request for courtesy deletion embarrassing, should they confine the explanation to their letter to the confidential committee?

It is an option, but I don't think it is a good idea. The committee member could come here, and state the nominator shared a confidential reason for their request. But the decision as to whether to keep or delete lies with the people participating here, not with the committee member. I think that, if the nominator is serious, they would be best served by voicing their true reason here. Geo Swan (talk) 09:32, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Geo Swan Something to note is that the image shows several people. If one of them has a good reason to request the image to be deleted (do we have an official list of reasons? Second one cited above does not sound serious to me, unlike the two others - but the first one should require some proof, like the third one states...), then it should not affect the others; the main image should be replaced with one that blurrs/blanks the face of that one person, and the extracted image of theirs could be deleted. I can think, however, of no good reason for the deletion of multiple extracted faces. Yet see for example File:Aylwin Lo, a CFC Media Lab alumnus, at a CFC event at the Bata shoe museum, in 2011 (6210871503) (cropped).jpg and File:Pearl Chen, a CFC Media Lab alumnus, at a CFC event at the Bata shoe museum, in 2011 (6210871503).jpg; the IP seems to be claiming to be each and every single person in the photo... this cannot be correct. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus ^Talk 09:53, 13 May 2024 (UTC) PS. I see this was explained later, feel free to ignore the second part of my message. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus ^Talk 09:56, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Piotrus, WRT the reasons to request courtesy deletion... Fifteen or sixteen years ago I participated in a DR where the justification of the individual requesting courtesy deletion was that she was young, inexperienced, and did not understand all the implications of a CC license. She had gone on a field trip, with fellow students, to Pond Inlet, one of the half dozen smallest, most isolated and most northerly communities in Canada. It is on the North Coast of Baffin Island. She had a great camera, and was a talented photographer, and had taken six dozen or so truly amazing photos. After I uploaded those photos from flickr she had a kind of moral panic, as her six dozen photos included a dozen or so images of Inuit children. These happy energetic children seemed very excited to have visitors to their community. Her moral panic was mainly over having uploaded these images of happy children. I don't know if she would still have felt this panic if the children's parents had explicitly given permision. In fact, she requested all six dozen photos be deleted. The DR decided to only delete those images that showed the Inuit children. Geo Swan (talk) 08:10, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - My keep is probably implied, but I will explicitly state that I, the uploader, favor keeping this image, for the reasons I stated above.

Since I noticed this nomination I cropped the File:Aylwin Lo, a CFC Media Lab alumnus, at a CFC event at the Bata shoe museum, in 2011 (6210871503) (cropped).jpg, File:Pearl Chen, a CFC Media Lab alumnus, at a CFC event at the Bata shoe museum, in 2011 (6210871503).jpg, File:Patrick Naval, a CFC Media Lab alumnus, at a CFC event at the Bata shoe museum, in 2011 (6210871503).jpg, File:Jacqueline Nuwame, a CFC Media Lab alumnus, at a CFC event at the Bata shoe museum, in 2011 (6210871503).jpg, File:Leonardo Dell'Anno, of the CFC Media Lab, at a CFC event at the Bata shoe museum, in 2011 (6210871503).jpg, File:Andrea Mallozzi, a CFC Media Lab alumnus, at a CFC event at the Bata shoe museum, in 2011 (6210871503).jpg. This is an example of the curation I described to nominator, above. I spent close to two hours on that, cropping the images, repeating my original research on the individuals, and creating wikidata entries for them.

Curation represents significant work. Geo Swan (talk) 09:11, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the clarification @Geo Swan To be honest, I wasn't entirely sure how the processes at Wikimedia Commons worked, so I really appreciate your help. I'm reaching out to request consideration for the deletion of the image due to my personal privacy concerns. However, I understand that this is merely a request and I respect the community's decision-making process. I also didn't realize how much effort had been put into curating the file.

Thank you for your time and consideration. [[Special:Contributions/North6318 (talk) 00:09, 14 May 2024 (UTC)|North6318 (talk) 00:09, 14 May 2024 (UTC)]] 01:19, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You are welcome.

Your next step, IMO, would be to write to the confidential committee, permissions-commonswikimedia.org, and ask them to confirm you are one of the people in the photograph.
Upload your favorite selfie, releasing it under what we consider a "free" license.

Could you clarify what you mean by "personal privacy concerns"?
What legal obligations do organizations like the Canadian Film Centre have to respect the privacy of people who accept invitations to the events they organize? Legally, I don't know, because I am not a lawyer, and the law can be highly counter-intuitive. My suspicion is that they have no legal obligation to honor attendees privacy concerns, so long as there was a note in the invite, or at the door, reminding attendees that official photographers would be circulating...
What moral obligations do organizations like the Canadian Film Centre have to respect the privacy of people who attend their events? If I were the CFC, I would have a pile of stickers, at the door, next to the name tags, that had one of those circles with a diagonal stripe through it, on top of a camera, and said something like, "I would like to opt out of having my picture taken at this event".

I'd have my official photographers try to avoid including individuals wearing this tag in group photos.

I'd have the photographers go through their photos, prior to printing them, looking to see if they ended up including people wearing the opt-out sticker, in spite of their best efforts. If that individual can be cropped out, or if there is an alternate photo, without them, Great.

But, ultimately, I'd let it be the responsibility of the opt-out person to keep an eye out for photographers. Geo Swan (talk) 21:51, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep A properly-licenced, posed, photograph taken at a public event, with no reasonable expectation of privacy. No valid reason for deletion given. [I also note that all of the derived images, of one individual each, are tagged for deletion with the same "I did not consent" rationale.] Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 13:29, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Andy Mabbett - that is an artifact. When I created headshots cropped from the original they inherited the DR. Sorry if I didn't make that clear when I mentioned them above. Cheers! Geo Swan (talk) 21:26, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Per above, multiple images of different people, claiming they are one of them. --RAN (talk) 01:02, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Interesting attempt at w:censorship by copyright. Deny censorship. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus ^Talk 09:42, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

More time

This edit looks like the nominator took the time to create their own wiki-ID. I think this could be because they are going to write to permissions-commonswikimedia.org, and then make a more detailed request.

So, I suggest we keep this DR open for at least an extra week, to give them a chance to do that.

Cheers! Geo Swan (talk) 08:15, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kolumbus buss.jpg[edit]

copied from https://www.aftenbladet.no/lokalt/i/EoVlja/bomringen-fungerer-8000-flere-reiser-med-bussen-hver-dag Jarekt (talk) 01:58, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Per nomination, copied from a news article. grendel|khan 08:44, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Caltex Records - Logo.png[edit]

COM:REDUNDANT to File:Caltex Records - Company Logo.png. Please ping if kept so I can fix the licensing/source. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 02:22, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Updated Caltex Records logo as shown in reference links. M-infoarchives (talk) 17:29, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:2006 July 24, Harbor near Athens 5.jpg[edit]

This file was initially tagged by Εὐθυμένης as no source (No source since) Syced (talk) 02:41, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Given that the source of the file already contains source={{own}} , I think this is a false positive. Syced (talk) 02:48, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Syced: Looks like some scanned material from third party (press/newspaper material?) to me. 😕🤷‍♂️ 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ^{ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ} 08:20, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Let's continue the discussion on the other one to avoid duplication. Syced (talk) 02:55, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:2006 July 24, Harbor near Athens 6.jpg[edit]

This file was initially tagged by Εὐθυμένης as no source (No source since) Syced (talk) 02:47, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Given that the source of the file already contains source={{own}} , I think this is a false positive. Syced (talk) 02:48, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Syced: Looks like some scanned material from third party (press/newspaper material?) to me. 😕🤷‍♂️ 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ^{ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ} 08:20, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I shot those pictures in that street in Greece. In 2004 most digital cameras produced pictures that looked like this 😅. I bought that Kyocera SL300R in 2004 but it was released in 2003. It was a great camera in terms of FPS but not in terms of resolution. Also, it was average for subjects exposed to direct sun light but anything in shadows came out very grainy/noisy. Syced (talk) 01:32, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files found with Special:Search/Port Vila - The Seafront's Park - panoramio[edit]

Same copyrighted public monument of Vanuatu as the one nominated at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Memorial to Vasiliy Golovnin (Russian) (23230894010).jpg.

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 03:19, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:230513-A-WN705-077 (53007024228).jpg[edit]

duplicate of File:2023 XFL Championship post-game celebration.jpg SecretName101 (talk) 05:11, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bonnie Anderson Is My 4 Year Old Daughter But In Toy Doll Form.png[edit]

Violation of COM:TOYS. Copyrighted character. (Oinkers42) (talk) 05:22, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:The Olsen Family.jpg[edit]

Delete Web photo, very likely not the uploader's. grendel|khan 08:48, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by User:CmdrDan[edit]

News screenshots[edit]

Emails and texts[edit]

Contracts and other legals[edit]

Cohen's media[edit]

Most of those uploaded in Category:Evidence presented in New York (criminal) trial of Donald Trump (and subcats) are not in the public domain, even though entered into the court docket. The WSJ and National Enquirer screenshots are copyrighted. The private correspondences between people are, presumably, copyrighted too. Contracts and legal documents, wordy, are also presumably copyrighted. Unless Cohen has released the audio recordings he made, they are protected by copyright (as with, I believe, the transcripts). There's one photo of Cohen that has an unknown author.

Some emails/texts, marked by (?), are so short I am unsure of their existence here being a copyright infringement. I am not sure about them and would like input. Please let me know of any mistakes in this large request. SWinxy (talk) 05:50, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:LGBTIQ+, intersex, trans, nonbinary, POC, sex work, HIV & AIDS, pink triangle, disability, inclusive diversity pride flag.png[edit]

Transphobic troll. see here https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/newest-pride-flag/ Kinopiko (talk) 06:03, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wyenra20240503.jpg[edit]

likely cd jacket https://twitter.com/wyenra/status/1751448182998081768. eien20 (talk) 06:12, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Creative Design Solution Logo.jpg[edit]

COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by company; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 06:18, 8 May 2024 (UTC) Template:Subst : delete2 Андреев Валерий Владимирович (talk) 11:54, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Композиция "КООРДИНАЦИОННЫЙ ЦЕНТР".jpg[edit]

Этот файл созданный мной уже 1,5 года используется мной на другой платформе Андреев Валерий Владимирович (talk) 06:25, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:ตราสัญลักษณ์จ.ภ 20240502134155.png[edit]

dfghjtrf JordanGlass37 - Alyssa May (talk) 06:35, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:ไม่มีชื่อ 488 20240502123203.png[edit]

kihhhuhuh JordanGlass37 - Alyssa May (talk) 06:35, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:ไม่มีชื่อ 473 20240502123114.png[edit]

79iokiiiki JordanGlass37 - Alyssa May (talk) 06:36, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:ไม่มีชื่อ 501.jpg[edit]

deletion 15 May JordanGlass37 - Alyssa May (talk) 06:46, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:ไม่มีชื่อ 473 20240501091104.png[edit]

I don't want to editing this in Wikimedia Commons anymore (requested by uploader) JordanGlass37 - Alyssa May (talk) 06:59, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Nominator is not the uploader. --Rosenzweig τ 08:16, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:ไม่มีชื่อ 501 20240501093205.png[edit]

I don't want to editing this in Wikimedia Commons anymore (requested by uploader) JordanGlass37 - Alyssa May (talk) 06:59, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Nominator is not the uploader. --Rosenzweig τ 08:16, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:ไม่มีชื่อ 488 20240501091206.png[edit]

I don't want to editing this in Wikimedia Commons anymore (requested by uploader) JordanGlass37 - Alyssa May (talk) 07:00, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Nominator is not the uploader. --Rosenzweig τ 08:16, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mapa Eleitoral Brasil Fictício - TESTE.png[edit]

Fictional and out of scope N Panama 84534 07:34, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Julianaplein 08 - 12.jpg[edit]

I posted this jpg-photo myself and find it to be of low resolution. Now I have improved the quality and want this one deleted to upload the better png-version. Profar (talk) 16:13, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Landhuis San Nicolaas, front facade.jpg. --Materialscientist (talk) 05:27, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Julianaplein 08 - 12.jpg[edit]

This image has been reposted yet again, this time without the watermark Profar (talk) 08:00, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Julianaplein 08 - 12 and 02 - 04.jpg[edit]

I posted this jpg-photo myself and find it to be of low resolution. Now I have improved the quality and want this one deleted to upload the better png-version. Profar (talk) 16:13, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Materialscientist (talk) 05:27, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Julianaplein 08 - 12 and 02 - 04.jpg[edit]

This image has been reposted yet again, this time without the watermark. Profar (talk) 08:01, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Scharlooweg 86 - 88, windows front facade.jpg[edit]

I posted this jpg-photo myself and find it to be of low resolution. Now I have improved the quality and want this one deleted to upload the better png-version. Profar (talk) 16:12, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Landhuis San Nicolaas, front facade.jpg. --Materialscientist (talk) 05:27, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Scharlooweg 86 - 88, windows front facade.jpg[edit]

This image has been reposted yet again, this time without the watermark. Profar (talk) 08:02, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Scharlooweg 53, front door.jpg[edit]

I posted this jpg-photo myself and find it to be of low resolution. Now I have improved the quality and want this one deleted to upload the better png-version. Profar (talk) 16:10, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Landhuis San Nicolaas, front facade.jpg. --Materialscientist (talk) 05:22, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Scharlooweg 53, front door.jpg[edit]

This image has been reposted yet again, this time without the watermark. Profar (talk) 08:03, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Werfstraat 08, side.jpg[edit]

I posted this jpg-photo myself and find it to be of low resolution. Now I have improved the quality and want this one deleted to upload the better png-version. Profar (talk) 16:11, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Landhuis San Nicolaas, front facade.jpg. --Materialscientist (talk) 05:28, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Werfstraat 08, side.jpg[edit]

This image has been reposted yet again, this time without the watermark. Profar (talk) 08:03, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Mbdev29 (talk · contribs)[edit]

not useful, some of the videos don't add anything over their image version, misgeneration issues, some are nearly static videos; if the AI used is not specified the remaining files could also be nominated separately

Prototyperspective (talk) 08:30, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete both per nominator. What's with that watermark from the (online) video convertor/editor on the top right there? - THV | ♂ | U | T - 23:07, 8 May 2024 (UTC); edited: 23:30, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Taras Hladun i Elżbieta Witek.jpg[edit]

Przestaję wyrażać zgodę na jego udostępnianie w internecie. Jestem autorem pliku i właścicielem praw autorskich. Taras Sh123 (talk) 08:31, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Taras Hladun i Jarosław Kaczyński w Rocznicę Katastrofy Smoleńskiej.jpg[edit]

Ponieważ jestem na nim ukazany, jestem jego autorem i właścicielem praw autorskich. Cofam zgodę na pokazywanie tego w internecie. Taras Sh123 (talk) 08:35, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:T29 Shikenjo-Mae (rail).png[edit]

JaWiki内において、画像の変更が反映されていないため。上島さくら (talk) 08:41, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Three Servicemen Statue.jpg[edit]

Unfree monument: see Category talk:Three Soldiers (statue)#This is a copyrighted work. Commercially-licensed image infringes the sculptor's posthumous copyright. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 09:05, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Creator died in 1999, undelete in 2070, I Believe. grendel|khan 08:54, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Luftaufnahme Kuhn Eugendorf.jpg[edit]

Appears to be taken from https://www.digando.com/vermieter/kuhn-baumaschinen but I am not 100% sure whether the Commons version pre or post dates the web version. This means I am opening a full discussion rather than tagging it as a copyvio. COM:PCP applies. Even though there are full camera details I believe formal permission shoudl be given via COM:VRT 🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 09:06, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Vietnam Veterans Memorial Statue 2023.jpg[edit]

Unfree monument: see Category talk:Three Soldiers (statue)#This is a copyrighted work. Commercially-licensed image infringes the sculptor's posthumous copyright. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 09:06, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That's a pity. I apologize for the mistake, there was no intention of breaking the copyright laws of the US. It's a beautiful scene, though.

--Mojnsen (talk) 12:20, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Mojnsen that's OK. In fact, in real life there was a more serious case, involving US Postal Service and the now-deceased sculptor of the Korean War Veterans Memorial (Gaylord v. United States), concerning the USPS' use of a former Marine's image of the said monument in their 2003 commemorative stamps as part of the 50th anniversary of the Korean War ceasefire. All deleted images of the said monument are categorized at Category:Korean War Veterans Memorial-related deletion requests/deleted.

Your image of the Three Soldiers will be undeleted 70+1 years after the sculptor's death, provided that the U.S. law is still restrictive with regards to the right of netizens/content creators to freely use or exploit images of copyrighted public art. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 14:17, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If it helps, in forty-six years the image will be restored here on Commons, when that sculpture is in the public domain. It's a good picture, and it's not being deleted forever. grendel|khan 08:58, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Undelete in 2070. grendel|khan 08:56, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Uid 0378221ce7a049c8ab2430a945a13dbb width 320 play 0 pos 0 gs 0 height 100.png[edit]

Uid_0378221ce7a049c8ab2430a945a13dbb_width_320_play_0_pos_0_gs_0_height_100.png Kziomi (talk) 09:07, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Церемониальная цепь мэра города Рязани.jpg[edit]

This file was initially tagged by Vladislav Khebnikov as Speedy (db-advert) and the most recent rationale was: |2=Не имеет никакой образовательной ценности. Не используется в других проектах Викимедиа. This could have some educational uses. Yann (talk) 10:01, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Eneritz Iturriagaetxebarria Tokikom Anboto.org 20220610.jpg[edit]

Unused image with bad quality. Source does not state that this would be not copyrighted. Velma (talk) 10:02, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Zakir Hosen Musician.jpg[edit]

This file was initially tagged by Tanbiruzzaman as Copyvio (db-copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Author is in the image|help=off Yann (talk) 10:05, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom (can we delete all the images uploaded by this account as F10? All the best -- Chuck ^Talk 22:30, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:النادي الرياضي أتلتيك بلونتار 2024.png[edit]

Personal photo for non-Wikipedian. Out of scope Mohammdaon (talk) 10:13, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Fridde+vårkonsert+1992.jpg[edit]

A self-made photo of a non-free photo does not become a free image. Tournesol (talk) 10:13, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by WikkiHow1245 (talk · contribs)[edit]

Personal/Private photo. COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST.

Mitte27 (talk) 10:13, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:النادي الرياضي أتلتيك بلونتار.png[edit]

Personal photo for non-Wikipedian. Out of scope Mohammdaon (talk) 10:14, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:جدول الترتيب و أتلتيك بلونتار في الصدار حائز على البطولة شومبيون.png[edit]

Personal photo for non-Wikipedian. Out of scope Mohammdaon (talk) 10:15, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Mayuresh Mawlankar (talk · contribs)[edit]

Personal/Private photo. COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST.

Mitte27 (talk) 10:17, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Skrif 12 (talk · contribs)[edit]

Flictional flags, out of scope + one small image without EXIF data, unlikely to be own work.

Yann (talk) 10:36, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Edmund Burke.jpg[edit]

No proof that this archive was made available to the public more than 50 years ago and Poland extended Berne onvention. 178.37.205.142 10:47, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Nawel Wapi ñi azentu.png[edit]

suspected CopyVio: satellite map claimed as own work Enyavar (talk) 10:49, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:حسن اشرف.jpg[edit]

Personal photo for non-Wikipedian. Out of scope Mohammdaon (talk) 10:50, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:سيرة ذاتية عن المخرج خالد قداح.jpg[edit]

Personal photo for non-Wikipedian. Out of scope Mohammdaon (talk) 10:51, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:TW 台灣 Taiwan TPE 台北市 Taipei City 中正區 Zhongzheng District Taipei City Mall morning August 2019 IX2 02.jpg[edit]

Copyrighted map in Taiwan. Solomon203 (talk) 11:23, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, COM:De minimis. メイド理世 (talk) 14:51, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by User:AureIio[edit]

Out of scope. Files uploaded for a user sandbox page on enwiki, since deleted. These images are either AI generated photographs or fictional logos for a fantasy transportation system in the UK. --Dogfennydd (talk) 11:30, 8 May 2024 (UTC) Template:Subst : delete3[reply]

Files uploaded by OrHaifler1 (talk · contribs)[edit]

COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST.

Mitte27 (talk) 12:03, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:ConstantinLuser.jpg[edit]

possible copyvio (c) markusroessle.com M2k~dewiki (talk) 12:14, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kevin prudente.jpg[edit]

Delete this photo only because its fake Kevinprudente (talk) 12:15, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete out of courtesy & lack of COM:EDUSE. --Achim55 (talk) 14:17, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Constantin luser.jpg[edit]

possible copyvio (c) markusroessle.com M2k~dewiki (talk) 12:15, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cocoportrait.jpg[edit]

possible copyvio (c) Markus Roessle M2k~dewiki (talk) 12:15, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Patna City Bihar India shams home - Oct 2014.jpg[edit]

also redirect file:Patna City Bihar India shams home - Oct 2014.jpg.jpg
Unused so-called selfie, out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 12:31, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:AMH-6424-NA Map of Bali and Lombok.jpg[edit]

Maps are not accurate, untidy, wrong, looks not real and some people use it for vandalism purposes. — Preceding unsigned comment added by JavaTigers (talk • contribs) 12:02, 8 May 2024‎ (UTC)[reply]

Keep, no valid reason for deletion. If you don't like it, make a new map from a free source or free sources, and get the projects to prefer it. — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 13:00, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, i don't see any valid reason to delete this file. Husky ^{(talk to me)} 13:22, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Husky: Thanks, but per COM:SIGN#Images in signature "Images of any kind must not be used in signatures". — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 14:01, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Tahaturkmenitc (talk · contribs)[edit]

Personal/Private photo. COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST.

Mitte27 (talk) 12:51, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:B1G B Wikipedia.pdf[edit]

Plain text document outside of COM:SCOPE. Marbletan (talk) 12:54, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Panoramalpdn.jpg[edit]

Neither CC-BY-SA, nor public domain. See for instance https://guialugaresturisticos.com/america-latina/brasil/minas-gerais/leopoldina/ and https://dioceseleopoldina.com.br/festa-de-sao-sebastiao-e-celebrada-em-toda-a-diocese-de-leopoldina/ Py4nf (talk) 13:06, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Это я.jpg[edit]

Unused personal photo. Out of scope. XXN, 18:11, 25 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 17:17, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Это я.jpg[edit]

Файл более не используется нигде Karenchik Kasabian (talk) 13:10, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:ابوالفضل منصوری.jpg[edit]

Personal/Private photo. COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Mitte27 (talk) 13:15, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Vezyah (talk · contribs)[edit]

Personal/Private photo. COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST.

Mitte27 (talk) 13:15, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Kuchen 01.jpg[edit]

Not useful for educational purposes Henehot13666 (talk) 12:38, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:23, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kuchen 01.jpg[edit]

Not useful. Personal photo. Garbage and peanuts in the background. Henehot13666 (talk) 13:26, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps this photo might be used to show how ordinary people cut cakes and what kind of cakes, that they use a cake server and how that looks like, and perhaps even how their kitchen looks like, what they put on their counter. But I recommend to have more categories that reflect those aspects. JopkeB (talk) 15:00, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Logo CBSP.jpg[edit]

No evidence of CC license at the source page: [1] . Maybe the license should be {{Attribution}} per [2], but unsure if this permission allows derivative works. Ankry (talk) 13:30, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Also, per metadata, the author is Krzysztof Sabak, not CBŚP, so the clause "W serwisie zamieszczane są także utwory, co do których prawa autorskie przysługują osobom trzecim. Ich wykorzystanie przez internautów wymaga zgody właścicieli tych materiałów." (The website also includes works whose copyrights belong to third parties. Their use by Internet users requires the consent of the owners of these materials.) may apply. Ankry (talk) 13:34, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Estero Country Club in the city of Estero, Florida.png[edit]

Not original work. This picture is the photo carousel at https://www.naplesgolfguy.com/estero-country-club/ Niteshift36 It is also found here: https://www.google.com/maps/uv?pb=!1s0x88db16842d5268e7%3A0xff8d0ed937f2c96b!3m1!7e164!15sCgIgARICEAE&hl=en&viewerState=ga&imagekey=!1e10!2sAF1QipMpRGAdN9mVbEnsyJd2Pzs-6FEV6ckc4X80iLR5# where it is listed as being placed by the owner. (talk) 13:40, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am a multi decade, national media professional. ALL the images I have uploaded fall into one of 3 categories. I either created it, commissioned it or secured all rights to it. In other words , I 100% have the legal right to do with the images as I please. (Though, to be clear, the images were obtained as part of a project for the area in question.) I have been dealing with image rights since before most of you were born and do not appreciate the FALSE anonymous allegations that place me in a situation where to defend the truth I would have to disclose who I am. If I have to disclose who I am, that is fine, but the FALSE nominator should disclose themselves as well. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Esteroinfo (talk • contribs) 16:46, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You aren't the uploader. Unless you are now going to admit that you operate multiple accounts that you haven't disclosed. Niteshift36 (talk) 20:47, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am not an expert on uploading images to wikipedia and even now do not exactly recall how we got all the images up, except that it took more than a single day and several tries. I recall that I had help from several members of our wikipedia group at the club house but none of us had ever uploaded images to the site before, so we were figuring it out together. Whether all or a portion of the images went up using my account, some other members account, while login in or not logged in, while in the club house, at my home, the library or Starbucks, if the process of uploading each image inadvertently created a new account each time, or any combination of the proceeding, I have absolutely no idea. If I had to upload images right now I am certain I would once gain run into all sorts of issues. If anything about the way the images were finally uploaded broke some secret unwritten rule than that is because we are new to this stuff and are not technologically proficient in the ways of the website. That is it, nothing more nefarious than that. Wikipedia is for everyone to use and for everyone to contribute to. I should not, and do not, have to defend my contributions against anonymous FALSE assertions. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Esteroinfo (talk • contribs) 21:05, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Well, it does have to be 'defended'. I would think that as "a multi decade, national media professional" you would value Wikipedia's practice of rigorously protecting the copyright holder's rights. As a professional, would you want me to be able to upload any picture you've taken and simply say "it's mine" without any evidence of that? Especially when the images have been used commercially. You have admitted that some of the images are ones you "secured all rights" to. That, in and of itself, requires some "defending". You uploaded the images under a different account. Either it is your account or the person who uploaded them essentially lied on the licensing. Log into YOUR account to start verifying that you are the uploader. Also, read the CC licensing you agreed to. Weren't some of these images part of commercial jobs? Stop being indignant and start supporting the claim. BTW, your whole 'before you were born' line gives me a laugh. Niteshift36 (talk) 12:42, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Karte Probestellen Landau.jpg[edit]

GoogleMaps CopyVio Enyavar (talk) 13:47, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Karte Probestellen Landau + Umgebung.jpg[edit]

GoogleMaps CopyVio Enyavar (talk) 13:48, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Shadow Wood Country Club in the city of Estero, Florida.jpg[edit]

Not original work. This picture is from the designers website: https://www.peacockandlewis.com/our-work/shadow-wood-country-club/ Niteshift36 (talk) 13:48, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am a multi decade, national media professional. ALL the images I have uploaded fall into one of 3 categories. I either created it, commissioned it or secured all rights to it. In other words , I 100% have the legal right to do with the images as I please. (Though, to be clear, the images were obtained as part of a project for the area in question.) I have been dealing with image rights since before most of you were born and do not appreciate the FALSE anonymous allegations that place me in a situation where to defend the truth I would have to disclose who I am. If I have to disclose who I am, that is fine, but the FALSE nominator should disclose themselves as well. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Esteroinfo (talk • contribs) 16:48, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You aren't the uploader. Unless you are now going to admit that you operate multiple accounts that you haven't disclosed. Niteshift36 (talk) 20:46, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am not an expert on uploading images to wikipedia and even now do not exactly recall how we got all the images up, except that it took more than a single day and several tries. I recall that I had help from several members of our wikipedia group at the club house but none of us had ever uploaded images to the site before, so we were figuring it out together. Whether all or a portion of the images went up using my account, some other members account, while login in or not logged in, while in the club house, at my home, the library or Starbucks, if the process of uploading each image inadvertently created a new account each time, or any combination of the proceeding, I have absolutely no idea. If I had to upload images right now I am certain I would once gain run into all sorts of issues. If anything about the way the images were finally uploaded broke some secret unwritten rule than that is because we are new to this stuff and are not technologically proficient in the ways of the website. That is it, nothing more nefarious than that. Wikipedia is for everyone to use and for everyone to contribute to. I should not, and do not, have to defend my contributions against anonymous FALSE assertions. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Esteroinfo (talk • contribs) 21:08, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Well, it does have to be 'defended'. I would think that as "a multi decade, national media professional" you would value Wikipedia's practice of rigorously protecting the copyright holder's rights. As a professional, would you want me to be able to upload any picture you've taken and simply say "it's mine" without any evidence of that? Especially when the images have been used commercially. You have admitted that some of the images are ones you "secured all rights" to. That, in and of itself, requires some "defending". You uploaded the images under a different account. Either it is your account or the person who uploaded them essentially lied on the licensing. Log into YOUR account to start verifying that you are the uploader. Also, read the CC licensing you agreed to. Weren't some of these images part of commercial jobs? Stop being indignant and start supporting the claim. BTW, your whole 'before you were born' line gives me a laugh. Niteshift36 (talk) 12:42, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Genova in Estero.jpg[edit]

Not original work. This picture is from the Naples Daily News website: https://www.naplesnews.com/story/money/real-estate/2020/02/29/living-genova-walk-nearby-park/4871870002/ It has been used several times by that paper. Also used by : https://naples.floridaweekly.com/articles/fourth-building-at-genova-nears-completion/ Niteshift36 (talk) 13:51, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am a multi decade, national media professional. ALL the images I have uploaded fall into one of 3 categories. I either created it, commissioned it or secured all rights to it. In other words , I 100% have the legal right to do with the images as I please. (Though, to be clear, the images were obtained as part of a project for the area in question.) I have been dealing with image rights since before most of you were born and do not appreciate the FALSE anonymous allegations that place me in a situation where to defend the truth I would have to disclose who I am. If I have to disclose who I am, that is fine, but the FALSE nominator should disclose themselves as well. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Esteroinfo (talk • contribs) 16:50, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You aren't the uploader. Unless you are now going to admit that you operate multiple accounts that you haven't disclosed. Niteshift36 (talk) 20:46, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am not an expert on uploading images to wikipedia and even now do not exactly recall how we got all the images up, except that it took more than a single day and several tries. I recall that I had help from several members of our wikipedia group at the club house but none of us had ever uploaded images to the site before, so we were figuring it out together. Whether all or a portion of the images went up using my account, some other members account, while login in or not logged in, while in the club house, at my home, the library or Starbucks, if the process of uploading each image inadvertently created a new account each time, or any combination of the proceeding, I have absolutely no idea. If I had to upload images right now I am certain I would once gain run into all sorts of issues. If anything about the way the images were finally uploaded broke some secret unwritten rule than that is because we are new to this stuff and are not technologically proficient in the ways of the website. That is it, nothing more nefarious than that. Wikipedia is for everyone to use and for everyone to contribute to. I should not, and do not, have to defend my contributions against anonymous FALSE assertions. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Esteroinfo (talk • contribs) 21:08, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Well, it does have to be 'defended'. I would think that as "a multi decade, national media professional" you would value Wikipedia's practice of rigorously protecting the copyright holder's rights. As a professional, would you want me to be able to upload any picture you've taken and simply say "it's mine" without any evidence of that? Especially when the images have been used commercially. You have admitted that some of the images are ones you "secured all rights" to. That, in and of itself, requires some "defending". You uploaded the images under a different account. Either it is your account or the person who uploaded them essentially lied on the licensing. Log into YOUR account to start verifying that you are the uploader. Also, read the CC licensing you agreed to. Weren't some of these images part of commercial jobs? Stop being indignant and start supporting the claim. BTW, your whole 'before you were born' line gives me a laugh. Niteshift36 (talk) 12:41, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bridge-at-koreshan-state-park-estero-florida-timothy-lowry copy.png[edit]

Not original work. https://fineartamerica.com/featured/bridge-at-koreshan-state-park-estero-florida-timothy-lowry.html?product=wood-print Here: https://www.gypsyjournalrv.com/2019/10/koreshan-state-historic-site/ and here: https://estero-fl.gov/wp-content/uploads/library-ada/financials/2017-2018%20Budget%20Village%20of%20Estero.pdf Niteshift36 (talk) 13:56, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am a multi decade, national media professional. ALL the images I have uploaded fall into one of 3 categories. I either created it, commissioned it or secured all rights to it. In other words , I 100% have the legal right to do with the images as I please. (Though, to be clear, the images were obtained as part of a project for the area in question.) I have been dealing with image rights since before most of you were born and do not appreciate the FALSE anonymous allegations that place me in a situation where to defend the truth I would have to disclose who I am. If I have to disclose who I am, that is fine, but the FALSE nominator should disclose themselves as well. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Esteroinfo (talk • contribs) 16:50, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You aren't the uploader. Unless you are now going to admit that you operate multiple accounts that you haven't disclosed. Niteshift36 (talk) 20:45, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am not an expert on uploading images to wikipedia and even now do not exactly recall how we got all the images up, except that it took more than a single day and several tries. I recall that I had help from several members of our wikipedia group at the club house but none of us had ever uploaded images to the site before, so we were figuring it out together. Whether all or a portion of the images went up using my account, some other members account, while login in or not logged in, while in the club house, at my home, the library or Starbucks, if the process of uploading each image inadvertently created a new account each time, or any combination of the proceeding, I have absolutely no idea. If I had to upload images right now I am certain I would once gain run into all sorts of issues. If anything about the way the images were finally uploaded broke some secret unwritten rule than that is because we are new to this stuff and are not technologically proficient in the ways of the website. That is it, nothing more nefarious than that. Wikipedia is for everyone to use and for everyone to contribute to. I should not, and do not, have to defend my contributions against anonymous FALSE assertions. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Esteroinfo (talk • contribs) 21:09, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Well, it does have to be 'defended'. I would think that as "a multi decade, national media professional" you would value Wikipedia's practice of rigorously protecting the copyright holder's rights. As a professional, would you want me to be able to upload any picture you've taken and simply say "it's mine" without any evidence of that? Especially when the images have been used commercially. You have admitted that some of the images are ones you "secured all rights" to. That, in and of itself, requires some "defending". You uploaded the images under a different account. Either it is your account or the person who uploaded them essentially lied on the licensing. Log into YOUR account to start verifying that you are the uploader. Also, read the CC licensing you agreed to. Weren't some of these images part of commercial jobs? Stop being indignant and start supporting the claim. BTW, your whole 'before you were born' line gives me a laugh. Niteshift36 (talk) 12:41, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Map of all lands under fakhrudin dynasty Mogadishian sultanet.jpg[edit]

GoogleMaps CopyVio. Also, obviously falsified map of history Enyavar (talk) 14:01, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mads Lausten.jpg[edit]

out of project scope / possible copyvio (not a selfie) M2k~dewiki (talk) 14:03, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:SSN-758 Patch.jpg[edit]

unused, superseded by a PNG – Illegitimate Barrister (talk • contribs), 14:03, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Coconut-Point-Mall Coconut-Point.jpg[edit]

Not original work. This picture is from https://www.esterotoday.com/the-future-of-esteros-malls-brighter-than-the-national-outlook/ and https://bonitasprings.floridaweekly.com/articles/three-new-stores-are-open-at-coconut-point-in-estero/ Niteshift36 (talk) 14:04, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am a multi decade, national media professional. ALL the images I have uploaded fall into one of 3 categories. I either created it, commissioned it or secured all rights to it. In other words , I 100% have the legal right to do with the images as I please. (Though, to be clear, the images were obtained as part of a project for the area in question.) I have been dealing with image rights since before most of you were born and do not appreciate the FALSE anonymous allegations that place me in a situation where to defend the truth I would have to disclose who I am. If I have to disclose who I am, that is fine, but the FALSE nominator should disclose themselves as well. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Esteroinfo (talk • contribs) 16:51, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You aren't the uploader. Unless you are now going to admit that you operate multiple accounts that you haven't disclosed. Niteshift36 (talk) 20:44, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am not an expert on uploading images to wikipedia and even now do not exactly recall how we got all the images up, except that it took more than a single day and several tries. I recall that I had help from several members of our wikipedia group at the club house but none of us had ever uploaded images to the site before, so we were figuring it out together. Whether all or a portion of the images went up using my account, some other members account, while login in or not logged in, while in the club house, at my home, the library or Starbucks, if the process of uploading each image inadvertently created a new account each time, or any combination of the proceeding, I have absolutely no idea. If I had to upload images right now I am certain I would once gain run into all sorts of issues. If anything about the way the images were finally uploaded broke some secret unwritten rule than that is because we are new to this stuff and are not technologically proficient in the ways of the website. That is it, nothing more nefarious than that. Wikipedia is for everyone to use and for everyone to contribute to. I should not, and do not, have to defend my contributions against anonymous FALSE assertions. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Esteroinfo (talk • contribs) 21:09, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Well, it does have to be 'defended'. I would think that as "a multi decade, national media professional" you would value Wikipedia's practice of rigorously protecting the copyright holder's rights. As a professional, would you want me to be able to upload any picture you've taken and simply say "it's mine" without any evidence of that? Especially when the images have been used commercially. You have admitted that some of the images are ones you "secured all rights" to. That, in and of itself, requires some "defending". You uploaded the images under a different account. Either it is your account or the person who uploaded them essentially lied on the licensing. Log into YOUR account to start verifying that you are the uploader. Also, read the CC licensing you agreed to. Weren't some of these images part of commercial jobs? Stop being indignant and start supporting the claim. BTW, your whole 'before you were born' line gives me a laugh. Niteshift36 (talk) 12:40, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Franklin VA sign.JPG[edit]

I don't doubt this file's provenance, but as a slavish reproduction of substantial prose originally published by the Department of Conservation and Historic Resources in 1988, this is nonetheless a derivative work of whomever originally wrote it. Fourthords | =Λ= | 14:07, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Coconut Point Mall af15828e-1a5a-40e4-8c24-b51386213432.png[edit]

Not original work. Used at https://www.visitflorida.com/travel-ideas/articles/shopping-estero-coconut-point-fort-myers/ and https://www.simon.com/mall/coconut-point/about Niteshift36 (talk) 14:11, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am a multi decade, national media professional. ALL the images I have uploaded fall into one of 3 categories. I either created it, commissioned it or secured all rights to it. In other words , I 100% have the legal right to do with the images as I please. (Though, to be clear, the images were obtained as part of a project for the area in question.) I have been dealing with image rights since before most of you were born and do not appreciate the FALSE anonymous allegations that place me in a situation where to defend the truth I would have to disclose who I am. If I have to disclose who I am, that is fine, but the FALSE nominator should disclose themselves as well. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Esteroinfo (talk • contribs) 16:52, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You aren't the uploader. Unless you are now going to admit that you operate multiple accounts that you haven't disclosed. Niteshift36 (talk) 20:44, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I am not an expert on uploading images to wikipedia and even now do not exactly recall how we got all the images up, except that it took more than a single day and several tries. I recall that I had help from several members of our wikipedia group at the club house but none of us had ever uploaded images to the site before, so we were figuring it out together. Whether all or a portion of the images went up using my account, some other members account, while login in or not logged in, while in the club house, at my home, the library or Starbucks, if the process of uploading each image inadvertently created a new account each time, or any combination of the proceeding, I have absolutely no idea. If I had to upload images right now I am certain I would once gain run into all sorts of issues. If anything about the way the images were finally uploaded broke some secret unwritten rule than that is because we are new to this stuff and are not technologically proficient in the ways of the website. That is it, nothing more nefarious than that. Wikipedia is for everyone to use and for everyone to contribute to. I should not, and do not, have to defend my contributions against anonymous FALSE assertions. Esteroinfo (talk) 21:10, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Well, it does have to be 'defended'. I would think that as "a multi decade, national media professional" you would value Wikipedia's practice of rigorously protecting the copyright holder's rights. As a professional, would you want me to be able to upload any picture you've taken and simply say "it's mine" without any evidence of that? Especially when the images have been used commercially. You have admitted that some of the images are ones you "secured all rights" to. That, in and of itself, requires some "defending". You uploaded the images under a different account. Either it is your account or the person who uploaded them essentially lied on the licensing. Log into YOUR account to start verifying that you are the uploader. Also, read the CC licensing you agreed to. Weren't some of these images part of commercial jobs? Stop being indignant and start supporting the claim. BTW, your whole 'before you were born' line gives me a laugh. Niteshift36 (talk) 12:40, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:BRRCS RECORDS.png[edit]

delete wrong file Brrcsrecords (talk) 14:12, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Miromar-Outlets-Estero-FL.jpg[edit]

Not original work. Used at: https://www.mustdo.com/fl/naples-bonita-springs-marco-island-everglades/shopping/miromar-outlets/ and https://www.happeningsmagazine.net/miromar-outlets-reopening-may-4/ Niteshift36 (talk) 14:13, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am a multi decade, national media professional. ALL the images I have uploaded fall into one of 3 categories. I either created it, commissioned it or secured all rights to it. In other words , I 100% have the legal right to do with the images as I please. (Though, to be clear, the images were obtained as part of a project for the area in question.) I have been dealing with image rights since before most of you were born and do not appreciate the FALSE anonymous allegations that place me in a situation where to defend the truth I would have to disclose who I am. If I have to disclose who I am, that is fine, but the FALSE nominator should disclose themselves as well. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Esteroinfo (talk • contribs) 16:53, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You aren't the uploader. Unless you are now going to admit that you operate multiple accounts that you haven't disclosed. Niteshift36 (talk) 20:43, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I am not an expert on uploading images to wikipedia and even now do not exactly recall how we got all the images up, except that it took more than a single day and several tries. I recall that I had help from several members of our wikipedia group at the club house but none of us had ever uploaded images to the site before, so we were figuring it out together. Whether all or a portion of the images went up using my account, some other members account, while login in or not logged in, while in the club house, at my home, the library or Starbucks, if the process of uploading each image inadvertently created a new account each time, or any combination of the proceeding, I have absolutely no idea. If I had to upload images right now I am certain I would once gain run into all sorts of issues. If anything about the way the images were finally uploaded broke some secret unwritten rule than that is because we are new to this stuff and are not technologically proficient in the ways of the website. That is it, nothing more nefarious than that. Wikipedia is for everyone to use and for everyone to contribute to. I should not, and do not, have to defend my contributions against anonymous FALSE assertions. Esteroinfo (talk) 21:10, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Well, it does have to be 'defended'. I would think that as "a multi decade, national media professional" you would value Wikipedia's practice of rigorously protecting the copyright holder's rights. As a professional, would you want me to be able to upload any picture you've taken and simply say "it's mine" without any evidence of that? Especially when the images have been used commercially. You have admitted that some of the images are ones you "secured all rights" to. That, in and of itself, requires some "defending". You uploaded the images under a different account. Either it is your account or the person who uploaded them essentially lied on the licensing. Log into YOUR account to start verifying that you are the uploader. Also, read the CC licensing you agreed to. Weren't some of these images part of commercial jobs? Stop being indignant and start supporting the claim. BTW, your whole 'before you were born' line gives me a laugh. Niteshift36 (talk) 12:40, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Nizwa Fort in the interior of Oman attacked by British RAF fighter jets during Jebel Akhdar War.png[edit]

Originally incorrectly released under CC license. The only way to keep this file would be if it was PD, but I am not aware of any PD license that fits it. Jarekt (talk) 14:13, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Miromar-Outlets-Estero-FL2.jpg[edit]

Not original work. Used here: https://miromar.com/2020/05/06/miromar-outlets-opens-this-monday/ and here: https://southwestfloridatraveler.com/miromar-outlets/ Niteshift36 (talk) 14:16, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am a multi decade, national media professional. ALL the images I have uploaded fall into one of 3 categories. I either created it, commissioned it or secured all rights to it. In other words , I 100% have the legal right to do with the images as I please. (Though, to be clear, the images were obtained as part of a project for the area in question.) I have been dealing with image rights since before most of you were born and do not appreciate the FALSE anonymous allegations that place me in a situation where to defend the truth I would have to disclose who I am. If I have to disclose who I am, that is fine, but the FALSE nominator should disclose themselves as well. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Esteroinfo (talk • contribs) 16:54, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You aren't the uploader. Unless you are now going to admit that you operate multiple accounts that you haven't disclosed. Niteshift36 (talk) 20:43, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I am not an expert on uploading images to wikipedia and even now do not exactly recall how we got all the images up, except that it took more than a single day and several tries. I recall that I had help from several members of our wikipedia group at the club house but none of us had ever uploaded images to the site before, so we were figuring it out together. Whether all or a portion of the images went up using my account, some other members account, while login in or not logged in, while in the club house, at my home, the library or Starbucks, if the process of uploading each image inadvertently created a new account each time, or any combination of the proceeding, I have absolutely no idea. If I had to upload images right now I am certain I would once gain run into all sorts of issues. If anything about the way the images were finally uploaded broke some secret unwritten rule than that is because we are new to this stuff and are not technologically proficient in the ways of the website. That is it, nothing more nefarious than that. Wikipedia is for everyone to use and for everyone to contribute to. I should not, and do not, have to defend my contributions against anonymous FALSE assertions. Esteroinfo (talk) 21:11, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Well, it does have to be 'defended'. I would think that as "a multi decade, national media professional" you would value Wikipedia's practice of rigorously protecting the copyright holder's rights. As a professional, would you want me to be able to upload any picture you've taken and simply say "it's mine" without any evidence of that? Especially when the images have been used commercially. You have admitted that some of the images are ones you "secured all rights" to. That, in and of itself, requires some "defending". You uploaded the images under a different account. Either it is your account or the person who uploaded them essentially lied on the licensing. Log into YOUR account to start verifying that you are the uploader. Also, read the CC licensing you agreed to. Weren't some of these images part of commercial jobs? Stop being indignant and start supporting the claim. BTW, your whole 'before you were born' line gives me a laugh. Niteshift36 (talk) 12:39, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:江戸時代の眼鏡.JPG[edit]

This file was initially tagged by Licsak as no permission.

Keep: What permission is needed for PD images? ネイ (talk) 14:19, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image is a derivative of the digitized material of "Sanpoutaizenshinanguruma" （算法大全指南車）by the National Institute of Japanese Literature https://kokusho.nijl.ac.jp/biblio/100300497/107, but according to their usage guide, it is licensed under the license: "Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License CC BY-SA". According to the Wikimedia Commons'S basic rules, Commons:2D copying should be applied to faithful reproductions of old books whose copyrights have expired, but the original scan data is watermarked with 「小泉吉永作成」(created by Yoshinaga Koizumi) and is inconsistent with the Commons license terms. See File talk:江戸時代の眼鏡.JPG. Licsak (talk) 14:25, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the explanation - then, my opinion is still keep because (1) adding a watermark without creativity does not create new copyright, (2) the uploaded image does not contain the watermark at all. ネイ (talk) 15:36, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: I think that File:江戸時代の眼鏡.JPG is not from https://kokusho.nijl.ac.jp/biblio/100300497/107 . They seem to be different copies printed from the same woodblock. For example, the teardrop-shaped pattern on the foot of the upper right screen (byōbu) is slightly different. Several prints/re-issues of this book survived eg. [3]. For this File:江戸時代の眼鏡.JPG , only the uploader User:写真家 knows which print it came from. My citation in :ja:眼鏡 2024-05-06T14:26:02 merely proves that the original picture did indeed exist by 1801, not necessarily the same print or website. --Wotheina (talk) 00:47, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Aerial view of sun setting over Estero Bay.jpg[edit]

Not original work. Used here: https://www.theresidencesesterobay.com/location and here: https://naples.floridaweekly.com/articles/benefit-from-blue-zone-living-at-the-ritz-carlton-residences-estero-bay/ Niteshift36 (talk) 14:24, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:NGC 7244 SDSS.jpg[edit]

Image aujourd'hui en double et inutilisée. L'utilisateur Donald Pelletier en a créé une nouvelle version, bien mieux recadrée. Pour ces raisons, je demande la suppression de cette image créée par mes soins en 2022, si possible. Merci. GommeMagique (talk) 14:27, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hertz arena in Estero2.jpg[edit]

Not original work. Used here: https://www.facebook.com/HyattPlaceCoconutPoint/photos/hertz-arena-has-some-of-the-best-events-on-the-southwest-coastwelcome-to-all-our/813521547461233/ Attributed to Florida Weekly. Niteshift36 (talk) 14:28, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files in Category:EC-Audiovisual Center review needed[edit]

Unfortunately source says "Scopes: Information and education only" so these photos cannot be licensed under CC.

https://audiovisual.ec.europa.eu/en/copyright states: Unless otherwise indicated (e.g. in individual copyright notices) ...

// sikander { talk } 🦖 14:41, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I maintain that such a limitation violates the law of the European Commission, and is therefore not applicable, because of the rationale I laid out in Commons:Deletion requests/Template:EC-Audiovisual Center (which, I will note, was accepted by the closer). I will add that that same copyright page, after the aforementioned discussion occured, has been updated to state that "The audiovisual material (still images, moving images and sound sequences) owned by the EU and made available on the website of the Audiovisual Service of the European Commission is subject to the Commission’s reuse policy, set out by the Commission Decision of 12 December 2011 on the reuse of Commission documents," which explicitly prohibits the limitations mentioned above. Zoozaz1 (talk) 15:19, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mary of Rosary church Portoroz1.jpg[edit]

Per COM:FOP Slovenia: non-free modernist architecture from 1984 by Ivan Bregant (d. 2015) and Jože Marinko (living). TadejM ^(t/p) 14:55, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Also File:Mary of Rosary parish church Portoroz bells.jpg. --TadejM ^(t/p) 14:57, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep File:Mary of Rosary parish church Portoroz bells.jpg. Very little of the architecture is shown here. What can be seen is a de minimis portion of the larger architectural work. The image focuses on the bells, which are utilitarian objects. IronGargoyle (talk) 01:40, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Minecraft Map.png[edit]

Out of scope: Personal fiction Enyavar (talk) 14:57, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Zgornja Rečica (26317727652).jpg[edit]

Per COM:FOP Slovenia: non-free modern architecture by Janez Valentinčič (d. 1994). TadejM ^(t/p) 15:00, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Masa1996 (talk · contribs)[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagrams.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:01, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Coat of arms of Kabylia.png[edit]

fictious and hoax 2A01:CB08:ADB:E00:35B9:6775:89A0:7E14 15:01, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:JS Kabylie logo.png[edit]

fictious and hoax 2A01:CB08:ADB:E00:35B9:6775:89A0:7E14 15:02, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Drapeau Kabylie, Algérie.png[edit]

fictious and hoax 2A01:CB08:ADB:E00:35B9:6775:89A0:7E14 15:02, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Drapeau officiel de la Kabylie (région autonomiste du nord de l'Algérie).png[edit]

fictious and hoax 2A01:CB08:ADB:E00:35B9:6775:89A0:7E14 15:03, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Drapeau regional non officiel de la Kabylie (Région autonomiste du Nord de l'Algérie).png[edit]

fictious and hoax 2A01:CB08:ADB:E00:35B9:6775:89A0:7E14 15:03, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Blue and yellow flag.svg[edit]

fictious and hoax 2A01:CB08:ADB:E00:35B9:6775:89A0:7E14 15:04, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Flag of Tamurt Leqbayel.svg[edit]

No source 83.200.72.7 17:55, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. source seems not required for such a simple design, anybody can reproduce this. --Ellywa (talk) 23:06, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Flag of Tamurt Leqbayel.svg[edit]

fictious and hoax 2A01:CB08:ADB:E00:35B9:6775:89A0:7E14 15:05, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Kabyle People Flag.svg[edit]

No sources 83.200.35.234 22:17, 30 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I support this demand: counter-educational, pure personal work claiming to represent a part of the Amazigh people, with no supporting source. --Fanfwah (talk) 18:01, 2 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: COM:INUSE. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:03, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kabyle People Flag.svg[edit]

fictious and hoax 2A01:CB08:ADB:E00:35B9:6775:89A0:7E14 15:05, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:KABYLIE KABYLIE-DRAPEAU DE LA KABYLIE.jpg[edit]

fictious and hoax 2A01:CB08:ADB:E00:35B9:6775:89A0:7E14 15:06, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Kabylie flag.png[edit]

No source 83.200.72.7 17:56, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Reasonable to assume this is own work. --Ellywa (talk) 23:12, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kabylie flag.png[edit]

fictious and hoax 2A01:CB08:ADB:E00:35B9:6775:89A0:7E14 15:07, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kabyle Flag.png[edit]

fictious and hoax 2A01:CB08:ADB:E00:35B9:6775:89A0:7E14 15:07, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Amazigh flag 1.png[edit]

fictious and hoax 2A01:CB08:ADB:E00:D5FE:E544:9E48:3E0B 15:36, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Amazigh Zenaga flag.svg[edit]

fictious and hoax 2A01:CB08:ADB:E00:D5FE:E544:9E48:3E0B 15:36, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Annay n Tmurt Iqbayliyen.jpg[edit]

No sources 83.200.35.234 22:15, 30 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I support this demand: the file is pure personal work and not educationally useful, the claim to represent a part of the Amazigh people is supported by no source. --Fanfwah (talk) 17:13, 2 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: COM:INUSE. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:02, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Annay n Tmurt Iqbayliyen.jpg[edit]

fictious and hoax 2A01:CB08:ADB:E00:D5FE:E544:9E48:3E0B 15:37, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Drapeau associé aux Maghraouas.jpg[edit]

fictious and hoax 2A01:CB08:ADB:E00:D5FE:E544:9E48:3E0B 15:37, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Drapeau chenoui Ichenwiyen flag.jpg[edit]

fictious and hoax 2A01:CB08:ADB:E00:D5FE:E544:9E48:3E0B 15:38, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Drapeau des Chenouis.jpg[edit]

fictious and hoax 2A01:CB08:ADB:E00:D5FE:E544:9E48:3E0B 15:38, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Mozabite People Flag.svg[edit]

No sources 83.200.35.234 22:17, 30 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I support this demand: counter-educational, pure personal work claiming to represent a part of the Amazigh people, with no supporting source. --Fanfwah (talk) 17:28, 2 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: COM:INUSE. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:02, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mozabite People Flag.svg[edit]

fictious and hoax 2A01:CB08:ADB:E00:D5FE:E544:9E48:3E0B 15:40, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ichenwiyen flag Drapeau chenoui.jpg[edit]

fictious and hoax 2A01:CB08:ADB:E00:D5FE:E544:9E48:3E0B 15:40, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Amazigh Mzab Flag.jpg[edit]

No sources 83.200.35.234 22:12, 30 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I support this demand: counter-educational, pure personal work claiming to represent a part of the Amazigh people, with no supporting source. --Fanfwah (talk) 17:27, 2 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: COM:INUSE. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:01, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Amazigh Mzab Flag.jpg[edit]

fictious and hoax 2A01:CB08:ADB:E00:D5FE:E544:9E48:3E0B 15:41, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Britta-Peters-2023-c-Silke-Briel.jpg[edit]

possible copyvio (c) Silke Briel M2k~dewiki (talk) 15:46, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The credit names the photographer but it is no copyright violation since we have the rights to use the photo. I am re-checking with the photographer to get her explicit consent in writing and otherwise will remove it myself immediately. UKR Presse (talk) 16:04, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:White logo of Imagine Digital Studio.png[edit]

We updated to a new logo Airids (talk) 16:08, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Logo of Imagine Digital Studio.png[edit]

We updated to a new logo Airids (talk) 16:09, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Nauvoo Leigon Band.jpg[edit]

No info provided that this photo was indeed published before 1929. Only that it was used (and taken from) a relativily recent publication. The Banner (talk) 16:09, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It was taken from a from an 1865 series of pictures regarding the Utah Milita in the Civil War. LuxembourgLover (talk) 16:14, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

So you claim that the photo were coming out of a (linked) publication but in fact the source is different? The Banner (talk) 16:56, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

So we fix the source, no need for a deletion. You constantly want to delete my work instead of fixing the problems. LuxembourgLover (talk) 17:00, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That picture has a watermark and a statement "copyright not evaluated". So IMHO not suitable. The Banner (talk) 18:54, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep A higher quality version of the image is available here: https://catalog.churchofjesuschrist.org/assets/c98020f9-7890-4a79-9fed-39095894991d/0/12?lang=eng The reverse of the card -- https://catalog.churchofjesuschrist.org/assets/c98020f9-7890-4a79-9fed-39095894991d/0/13?lang=eng -- makes it clear the images were published in the 1860s. (The card's publisher, Savage & Ottinger, was dissolved in 1870.) The higher quality version of the image should be used and the information updated. —Tcr25 (talk) 19:18, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

So a new picture to be uploaded, with corrected licenses and a corrected name? The Banner (talk) 21:00, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The current image could be retained (with improved information), but a better quality version exists so I would think we'd rather have that. It could overwrite this file or be uploaded separately and this one then gets deleted as a lower quality duplicate. —Tcr25 (talk) 23:12, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Due to questionable sourcing, a new upload would be the best option. The Banner (talk) 09:45, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tcr25 said it is fine, I have a felling you just don't like me uploading stuff. LuxembourgLover (talk) 11:14, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@LuxembourgLover: , it's not quite fine. The file information needs to be improved and using the higher quality image would be preferred. —Tcr25 (talk) 11:46, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@LuxembourgLover: I have no problem with factual correct uploads of you. The Banner (talk) 15:07, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File information updated. —Tcr25 (talk) 11:46, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Robert Taylor Burton Military (1821–1907).jpg[edit]

No info provided that this photo was indeed published before 1929. Only that it was used (and taken from) a relativily recent publication. The Banner (talk) 16:10, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Alternate print of the same image here -- https://catalog.churchofjesuschrist.org/assets/baf0cfcb-2f58-427b-b444-391d6c01fc59/0/0?lang=eng . Photo is from 1901 and the repository notes no known copyright restrictions. File info should be updated. —Tcr25 (talk) 19:27, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Under USA copyright law an image loses its eligibility for a copyright at 120 years old from creation. --RAN (talk) 23:16, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep As uploader, no problems with copyright. Also, better a version were found. LuxembourgLover (talk)

The file information should still be updated/corrected based upon the information in the Church catalogue linked above. Tcr25 (talk) 20:15, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

So again everything needs to be replaced. The Banner (talk) 09:26, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The quality of this is image is pretty good, so just updating the info and making sure the license is properly described would be fine. —Tcr25 (talk) 21:13, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've updated the file information. —Tcr25 (talk) 11:36, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Study Permit of Canada Issued to Thai Citizen in 2016.jpg[edit]

Work of the Government of Canada, published in 2016. Document is not over 50 years, still under Crown Copyright - not yet Public Domain. Will expire January 1, 2067. One could make the argument it is PD-text but it includes some graphics, crest and such that would go beyond COM:TOO. PascalHD (talk) 16:15, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Mehmet Ali ( Mali ) Ünal (talk · contribs)[edit]

a) Article pages as PDF are out of scope, b) probably copyvios as they seem to be taken from a non-wikimedia encyclopedia.

Achim55 (talk) 16:24, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Atlantia logo.jpeg[edit]

SVG version existing; orphan Bruce The Deus (talk) 16:33, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:BERNOCCHI LOGO.jpg[edit]

SVG version uploaded; orphan Bruce The Deus (talk) 16:46, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Fairoz Khan Congress.jpg[edit]

Placed in Category:Photo agencies. Is this an own work or a press photo? 186.172.107.34 17:05, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Look at uploader's talk page please. 186.172.107.34 23:43, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files in Category:PostCardExpo 2008[edit]

There's zero evidence these postcards or stamps are in the public domain. The original artwork certainly isn't and the stamps don't seem to be official. So these images should be deleted as COPYVIO unless someone can provide evidence to the contrary.

Adamant1 (talk) 17:24, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Vesta in natural color.jpg[edit]

Image was not solely created by NASA, so PD can't be presumed here. The source page has no evidence of it being under a free license either. 179.221.200.5 17:37, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Centro Comercial Tolón Fashion Mall en Caracas.png[edit]

Low-quality duplicate of File:Centro Comercial Tolón Fashion Mall, Caracas.jpg Adeletron 3030 (talk) 17:52, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wikimedia Hackathon 2024 20240505 RSKY 02.jpg[edit]

Hackathon participant with red “no photo” lanyard is clearly visible (a bit to the left of the center of the image); COM:PEOPLE#House rules applies. Lucas Werkmeister (talk) 17:59, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. No issues from me on this. Robertsky (talk) 18:08, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Similar situation at File:Wikimedia Hackathon 2024 20240505 RSKY 17.jpg, I hope it’s okay to treat that as the same deletion request. --Lucas Werkmeister (talk) 18:00, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The person with the red lanyard is out of focus though. I can't make them out at the actual resolution. Robertsky (talk) 18:07, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

IMHO they’re recognizable enough – I don’t remember their name, but I feel confident I’d be able to pick them out if I was back at the hackathon. I recognize the person to the left of them, who’s about equally blurry, as Subbu Sastry. (But some more blur could be enough to make the photo acceptable, if you want to keep the photo of the person in focus.) Lucas Werkmeister (talk) 18:19, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have uploaded a couple of versions with increasing blurriness to the participant in question. Robertsky (talk) 18:37, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I think I’m okay with both of those (though I’d prefer only “more blur” staying). Lucas Werkmeister (talk) 18:38, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done (only 17.jpg – 02.jpg still requires action) Lucas Werkmeister (talk) 19:46, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I blurred out the first two versions of Wikimedia Hackathon 2024 20240505 RSKY 17.jpg. Disclosure: The uploader sent me a PM on Discord asking me to do so. Since it seemed uncontrovertial I did so, though I'd prefer all messages about admin actions be done on wiki going forward. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 19:54, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@The Squirrel Conspiracy: Thanks! Would you mind also deleting the other image linked above (where the photographer already agreed to deletion)? (Additional “red lanyard” deletion requests are here and here.) Lucas Werkmeister (talk) 22:55, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:George Nicolls.jpg[edit]

This file was initially tagged by Magog the Ogre as no license (No license since)

It does have a license for the US, but not for Ireland. Circa 1910s photo, could be public domain. Abzeronow (talk) 18:01, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per Template:PD-Ireland-anon CeltBrowne (talk) 18:04, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Do you have proof this was published anonymously? Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 20:04, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The same photo can be found (indirectly) on the official website of the National Library of Ireland here. They date the image to 1911. They are unable to attribute a photographer to the image.

If an academic authority as high as the NLI cannot identify a photographer, I think it's reasonable to assume it was published anonymously. NLI notes the version they have was amongst photographs found in the collection of Arthur Griffith. CeltBrowne (talk) 21:33, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep You cannot prove a negative. Tineye and Google searched 16 billion images and found no one claiming an active copyright for the image. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) (talk • contribs) 01:47, 9 May 2024‎ (UTC)[reply]
- I'm inclined to agree with keep since as above, NLI cannot identify the photographer, which is why sources are important, not just web search and reverse web search. Abzeronow (talk) 17:08, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by GmodKing4444 (talk · contribs)[edit]

Out of scope

Trade (talk) 01:04, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: in use. --Krd 06:45, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by GmodKing4444 (talk · contribs)[edit]

Out of scope: fictitious flags, unused outside a Wikipedia user sandbox which is clearly not intended to become an encyclopedia article ("Warning: The Veestian Union is not a real country this is only for fun").

I realize these files have been discussed previously, but the previous nomination was closed as "in use", and these files do not appear to be legitimately in use.

Omphalographer (talk) 18:11, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Karezi.jpg[edit]

not published before 1929 – person wasn't born then. picture from 1962 according to https://www.protothema.gr/stories/article/298868/tzeni-tzeni-theatrina-me-thita-kefalaio/ and widely used on the web – license and source unclear, but probably not CC or copyright free https://www.listal.com/viewimage/6536199 — https://www.thetoc.gr/politismos/article/tzeni-karezi-i-ksexwristi-star-tou-ellinikou-kinimatografou/ Albinfo (talk) 19:00, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wikimedia Hackathon 2024-29-.jpg[edit]

Hackathon participant with red “no photo” lanyard is visible on the table behind and to the right of the “main” one (between me in the teal/pink shirt and Mahir with the face mask); two or three more red lanyards (I think) at the right edge. COM:PEOPLE#House rules applies. Could probably be solved with a judicious blur / crop and deleting the original version. Lucas Werkmeister (talk) 19:36, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The same participants are also visible on File:Wikimedia Hackathon 2024-28-.jpg, reusing this deletion request for both photos. --Lucas Werkmeister (talk) 19:37, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Photographer uploaded a new version of Wikimedia Hackathon 2024-29-.jpg. The old (original) version can now be deleted. Kruusamägi (talk) 19:36, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

With Wikimedia Hackathon 2024-28-.jpg, that face is not identifiable. So I see no problem there. Kruusamägi (talk) 19:38, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I can easily recognize the person, and the red lanyard is clearly visible even if you ignore the face. I maintain that this must be addressed. Lucas Werkmeister (talk) 22:54, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

When you where there and know the person, then you are obviosly able to recognize the person. Not so for anyone else. Kruusamägi (talk) 15:11, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Yassine Oubihi Photo.jpg[edit]

This photo is an out-of-scope portrait being used by the uploader for promotional purposes. TornadoLGS (talk) 19:41, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Shebinsaleem08 (talk · contribs)[edit]

Out of scope: plain text. As previously, if you are trying to edit a Wikipedia article, you need to enter the text into the Wikipedia edit page. You cannot edit a Wikipedia article by uploading PDF documents.

Omphalographer (talk) 20:12, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Drsamir3 wordpress.pdf[edit]

Out of scope: screenshot of a likely spam blog (articles in Arabic about various medical conditions). Omphalographer (talk) 20:13, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's not a spam it's a blog for a well known doctor Tabeb21 (talk) 13:21, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:TheSocialOrganization.pdf[edit]

Out of scope: plain text. Omphalographer (talk) 20:15, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Flag of Myanmar Border Guard Forces.png[edit]

Reasons for deletion request -နေနီဝန်း (talk) 20:16, 8 May 2024 (UTC) I wrongly created this flag based on a single photo of BGP(police) meeting with Bangladesh. It's not BGF flag, neither of BGP nor any forces. I, the author of this file, request to delete it.[reply]

File:Ductless Fume Hood Unit.jpg[edit]

Copyright violation from https://www.tion.co.uk/core/ductless-fume-cupboard/ Reconrabbit (talk) 20:19, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ducted Fume Cupboard.jpg[edit]

Copyright violation from https://www.tion.co.uk/core/ducted-fume-cupboards/ Reconrabbit (talk) 20:19, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:MG 6467 (42238624734).jpg[edit]

I checked a random number of photos on Flickr and they say photo Mtur. This photo say "Foto: Governo do Distrito Federal/Bento Viana" so I think it is likely that this photo is not taken by Mtur. MGA73 (talk) 20:20, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, per COM:PCP. RodRabelo7 (talk) 23:28, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wikimedia Hackathon 2024-31-.jpg[edit]

COM:PEOPLE#House rules, hackathon participants with red “no photo” lanyard are clearly visible (on the right, and in the background in the middle). Taavi (talk!) 20:29, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Photographer uploaded a croped version. The old (original) version can now be deleted. Kruusamägi (talk) 19:30, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:View from above of the St. Sotir Church in Korçë.jpg[edit]

most probably Wikimapia is not the origianl source as this image was posted on FB and online forums in April 2019 https://www.facebook.com/welcometokorca/photos/a.1106110616098256/5410058655703409/?type=3 Albinfo (talk) 20:40, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Aromanian St. Sotir Church of Korçë.jpg[edit]

I don't know if WIkimapia is the orginal source as this image was posted more or less at the same time on FB https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File%3AAromanian%5FSt.%5FSotir%5FChurch%5Fof%5FKor%C3%A7%C3%AB.jpg Albinfo (talk) 20:42, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Aromanian Church St. Sotir.jpg[edit]

I'm not sure if Wikimapia was the original source as on this site is a reference to Instagram Albinfo (talk) 20:44, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pavla Mrňousová.jpg[edit]

This file was initially tagged by Harold as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: COM:CSD#F10 Fine portrait. Yann (talk) 22:05, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"A personal image of a user who has no constructive global contributions" (per COM:CSD#F10), see meta:Special:CentralAuth/Pavla_Mrňousová and cs:Pavla Mrňousová (three times deleted as "non-notable"). --Harold (talk) 22:12, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Je to moje soukromá fotka Pavla Mrňousová (talk) 09:20, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wamp 3.2.0.png[edit]

Possible copyvio: Screenshot of a software CoffeeEngineer (talk) 22:14, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. The software in this screenshot is freely licensed. Omphalographer (talk) 00:53, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Borduria-shield.PNG[edit]

This was included in a deletion request by User:PseudoSkull in 2023 but without adding the DR template to the file, and not addressed by the closing admin User:Ellywa who deleted the Syldavia flags. This case is different from the Syldavia flag, as this purported "Bordurian symbol" apparently wasn't designed by Hergé for the Tintin comics but is the uploader's own invention as "a possible Bordurian symbol based on the Nazi German Eagle", per the file's description. As I commented in the previous deletion discussion, I think that it is therefore misleading, not educationally useful and out of scope. This particular file is not in use in any Wikimedia project at the time of nomination. Unfortunately, there's also an SVG version File:Borduria-shield.svg which is in use in three projects and which we therefore, if we apply COM:INUSE strictly, can't delete. It's an example of the dangers of such inventions, however, if we look at es:El cetro de Ottokar and tr:Bordurya, where the symbol is unquestioningly used as if it were part of Hergé's work; as if it were appearing in King Ottokar's Sceptre, which it is not. The third use is in a German Wikinews article where it's used as an example of a "not Nazi, but Nazi-like symbol", so this seems like a legitimate use - maybe we could remove the file from the Spanish and Turkish articles where it's mistakenly used, and rename it to something like "fictional Nazi-like symbol" for uses such as in Wikinews, to avoid confusion in the future...? Gestumblindi (talk) 22:20, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Lesothan Freedom of Panorama does not cover free uses of photographs of copyrighted public art and architecture of that country. The new Parliament Building was inaugurated in 2012 and authored by China Northeast Architectural design and Research Institute. Needs commercial licensing permission from the author of the depicted architecture. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 23:52, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Flag of York County va.jpg[edit]

File:Chinese Lesotho project Lesotho Parliament II.jpg[edit]

Same as Commons:Deletion requests/File:Parliament Building In Maseru.jpg. No indication that the Flickr uploader, "OER Africa", has been given licensing clearance from the author of the building, China Northeast Architectural design and Research Institute. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 23:57, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/2024/05/08

May 8[edit]

Files uploaded by Eacorlor (talk · contribs)[edit]

File:Triângulo.jpg[edit]

File:My english teacher who likes weezer.jpg[edit]

File:Metrolink icon small.png[edit]

File:CFC Media Lab's Pearl Chen, Patrick Naval, Aylwin Lo, Jacqueline Nuwame, Ana Serrano, Leonardo Dell'Anno and Andrea Mallozzi at the Bata shoe museum (6210871503).jpg[edit]

File:Kolumbus buss.jpg[edit]

File:Caltex Records - Logo.png[edit]

File:2006 July 24, Harbor near Athens 5.jpg[edit]

File:2006 July 24, Harbor near Athens 6.jpg[edit]

Files found with Special:Search/Port Vila - The Seafront's Park - panoramio[edit]

File:Arif2007.jpg[edit]

File:All members of our family.webp[edit]

File:Momtaj begum 1978.jpg[edit]

File:Karim Uddin 1972.jpg[edit]

File:Md. Al amin 2002.jpg[edit]

File:Md. Yeamin 12 05 2017.jpg[edit]

File:230513-A-WN705-077 (53007024228).jpg[edit]

File:Bonnie Anderson Is My 4 Year Old Daughter But In Toy Doll Form.png[edit]

File:The Olsen Family.jpg[edit]

Files uploaded by User:CmdrDan[edit]

News screenshots[edit]

Emails and texts[edit]

Contracts and other legals[edit]

Cohen's media[edit]

File:LGBTIQ+, intersex, trans, nonbinary, POC, sex work, HIV & AIDS, pink triangle, disability, inclusive diversity pride flag.png[edit]

File:Wyenra20240503.jpg[edit]

File:Creative Design Solution Logo.jpg[edit]

File:Композиция "КООРДИНАЦИОННЫЙ ЦЕНТР".jpg[edit]

File:ตราสัญลักษณ์จ.ภ 20240502134155.png[edit]

File:ไม่มีชื่อ 488 20240502123203.png[edit]

File:ไม่มีชื่อ 473 20240502123114.png[edit]

File:ไม่มีชื่อ 501.jpg[edit]

File:ไม่มีชื่อ 473 20240501091104.png[edit]

File:ไม่มีชื่อ 501 20240501093205.png[edit]

File:ไม่มีชื่อ 488 20240501091206.png[edit]

File:Mapa Eleitoral Brasil Fictício - TESTE.png[edit]

File:Julianaplein 08 - 12.jpg[edit]

File:Julianaplein 08 - 12.jpg[edit]

File:Julianaplein 08 - 12 and 02 - 04.jpg[edit]

File:Julianaplein 08 - 12 and 02 - 04.jpg[edit]

File:Scharlooweg 86 - 88, windows front facade.jpg[edit]

File:Scharlooweg 86 - 88, windows front facade.jpg[edit]

File:Scharlooweg 53, front door.jpg[edit]

File:Scharlooweg 53, front door.jpg[edit]

File:Werfstraat 08, side.jpg[edit]

File:Werfstraat 08, side.jpg[edit]

Files uploaded by Mbdev29 (talk · contribs)[edit]

File:Taras Hladun i Elżbieta Witek.jpg[edit]

File:Taras Hladun i Jarosław Kaczyński w Rocznicę Katastrofy Smoleńskiej.jpg[edit]

File:T29 Shikenjo-Mae (rail).png[edit]

File:Three Servicemen Statue.jpg[edit]

File:Luftaufnahme Kuhn Eugendorf.jpg[edit]

File:Vietnam Veterans Memorial Statue 2023.jpg[edit]

File:Uid 0378221ce7a049c8ab2430a945a13dbb width 320 play 0 pos 0 gs 0 height 100.png[edit]

File:Церемониальная цепь мэра города Рязани.jpg[edit]

File:Eneritz Iturriagaetxebarria Tokikom Anboto.org 20220610.jpg[edit]

File:Zakir Hosen Musician.jpg[edit]

File:النادي الرياضي أتلتيك بلونتار 2024.png[edit]

File:Fridde+vårkonsert+1992.jpg[edit]

Files uploaded by WikkiHow1245 (talk · contribs)[edit]

File:النادي الرياضي أتلتيك بلونتار.png[edit]

File:جدول الترتيب و أتلتيك بلونتار في الصدار حائز على البطولة شومبيون.png[edit]

Files uploaded by Mayuresh Mawlankar (talk · contribs)[edit]

Files uploaded by Skrif 12 (talk · contribs)[edit]

File:Edmund Burke.jpg[edit]

File:Nawel Wapi ñi azentu.png[edit]

File:حسن اشرف.jpg[edit]

File:سيرة ذاتية عن المخرج خالد قداح.jpg[edit]

File:TW 台灣 Taiwan TPE 台北市 Taipei City 中正區 Zhongzheng District Taipei City Mall morning August 2019 IX2 02.jpg[edit]

Files uploaded by User:AureIio[edit]

Files uploaded by OrHaifler1 (talk · contribs)[edit]

File:ConstantinLuser.jpg[edit]

File:Kevin prudente.jpg[edit]

File:Constantin luser.jpg[edit]

File:Cocoportrait.jpg[edit]

File:Patna City Bihar India shams home - Oct 2014.jpg[edit]

File:AMH-6424-NA Map of Bali and Lombok.jpg[edit]

Files uploaded by Tahaturkmenitc (talk · contribs)[edit]