Commons:Deletion requests/2024/04/06

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
5 April 2024
7 April 2024
Deletion requests on 6 April 2024

April 6[edit]

File:Pavilhão Russia - Expo Dubai 2020 (51613195170).jpg[edit]

No freedom of panorama in the United Arab Emirates A1Cafel (talk) 02:49, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Really? :/ I've uploaded many pavillions
Today I'm on a hurry, but tomorrow I can send them to deletion on a bacth.
Sorry for this. Sintegrity (talk) 10:29, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Sintegrity no choice, copyrighted works of art and architecture found permanently in public spaces in U.A.E. cannot be hosted commercially; COM:FOP UAE states the law only permits commercial distributions through "broadcasts", not through photos.  Delete the image here unless U.A.E. changes their obsolete law not fitting to Internet and I.T. age. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 05:45, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files from File:Visit of Josep Borrell to Agadez, Niger 06-07-2023 (1).jpg[edit]

Twitter post has no indication of CC-BY-SA license for this photo. Borrell works for the European Union but cannot assume EC-Audiovisual Center CC-BY license applies

// sikander { talk } 🦖 03:17, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the alert @Sikander: . The photo was posted by the official twitter account of Borrell, and is reported as owned by the Commission also by other reputable media, e.g. Politico. The media advisory about the visit states that "Audiovisual footage of the visit will be provided by Europe by Satellite". The EbS website features the original picture, and to its right the link "copyright" points to CC BY-SA 4.0. I am thus fully confident that the EC license CC-BY does apply. --Dans (talk) 18:48, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Dans: Ah OK, it's good that the same photo is on AudioVisual website. However the copyright section on the page states "Scopes: Information and education only" and EC staff has confirmed that files with that restriction cannot be licensed as CC-BY-SA. Unfortunately this file and cropped images will have to be deleted. // sikander { talk } 🦖 12:53, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
thanks @Sikander: ; are you saying that that "scope" implies an additional NC condition, incompatible with Wikicommons? I find it legally flimsy that an additional sentence on the website would be enough to derogate the overall EU copyright regime of CC BY-SA and the Commission's reuse policy. I cannot access the VTRS ticket you mention on the other page. --Dans (talk) 13:00, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Dans: Yes, that is my understanding of the the legal notice which states: "Unless otherwise indicated (e.g. in individual copyright notices), content owned by the EU on this website is licensed under CC BY 4.0."
I don't have VTRS access either (maybe someday I will apply :)) and the email response from ec.europa.eu (with VTRS team cc'd) stated, "if the scope information remains at it is, the image is in deed disqualified for a publication in Wikimedia, which requires a free license such as cc-by-sa-4.0." Regards. // sikander { talk } 🦖 16:28, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:صورة من حديقة في قمة جبل ببلدية بني صاف بولاية عين تموشنت بالجزائر.jpg[edit]

per COM:NOT Riad Salih (talk) 03:43, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:176thAirControlSqdnRadar.jpg[edit]

The file is an image hosted on the website of 176th Air Control Squadron. Its EXIF documentation stated that it is photographed by Mark Farmer and provides a dead link to his personal website. According to his archived resume there, at 2005-05-09, he was a freelance photographer instead of an US Federal Government employee.

As only works of US Federal Government employees made for official duties are in U.S. public domain, it is likely that Mark Farmer still holds the copyright for his works. Unless we can reach out to him to obtain an explicit free license, the file is copyrightable and likely to be unfree. 廣九直通車 (talk) 05:06, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:الخماسي الخطير 💯 💪.png[edit]

this *seems* like a generic personal out of scope image, but given the stated subject matter am opening a deletion request on the slim chance this is actually a real organization Gnomingstuff (talk) 06:45, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tillie Walden. Saló del Còmic de Barcelona 2018.jpg[edit]

This file was initially tagged by Johnj1995 as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: F6|Doubtful own work.
Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion, as no evidence was provided.-- Túrelio (talk) 06:52, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi User:Túrelio, well, in fact evidence was provided, Kind of. User Johnj1995 apologised and said he had not seen the metadata information about the camera.
On the other hand my comment was as follows:
Hello, I am the author of this picture. Tillie Walden was in Barcelona in 2018, invited to the International Comic Festival from Barcelona. I have been attending this event for years and I have done hundred of pictures of comic authors, if you have a look at my uploaded pictures. Why user User:JohnCWiesenthal asked for a fast deletion because of copyright issues, is not understadable to me. By the way, that year I borrowed a Canon camera belonging to Wikimedia Deutschland. If you have questions, just ask to me. Thanks.
--Ferran Cornellà (talk) Ferran Cornellà (talk) 08:19, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Evidence meant to support deletion, which had been requested by another user. I also wonder why then you tagged it (incompletely) for deletion. --Túrelio (talk) 08:27, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi User:Túrelio, I did not want to tag it for deletion. Unfortunatelly, it seems to be that according to the policy, if I wanted to cancel the Speed Deletion request, the only way was to change it for a regular deletion request, according to the message I got, which I found very strange, cause anyway I was always against the deletion. Maybe the warning was a bad translation from the english original text, as I read it in catalan, or maybe the text was obsolete, it is possible, don't know. But it seemed that once there is a deletion request from a user -even if by mistake- you cannot just undo it and cannot avoid the discusion procedure. If there was some mistake, I apologize. The procedure remains unclear to me. Thanks
Ferran Cornellà (talk) 10:25, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
As the initial speedy-tagger seems to have retracted (see User talk:JohnCWiesenthal) his suspicion, and as no copyvio-supporting evidence has been presented, I vote  Keep. --Túrelio (talk) 18:44, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mixalakopoulou.jpg[edit]

Way too recent as a bulding/structure in order to fall out of copyrights, since there's no FOP in Greece. 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 07:53, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


File:DivingAt2004SummerOlympics-1.jpg[edit]

Way too recent as a bulding/structure in order to fall out of copyrights, since there's no FOP in Greece. 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 07:57, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


File:Ketoconazole STADA©.jpg[edit]

File:Ketoconazole STADA©.jpg AnVuong1222004 (8) (talk) 10:05, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete AnVuong1222004 (8) (talk) 10:05, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bodø lufthavn.jpg[edit]

Fbodø havn 2001:464D:7919:0:12E:AFED:EA30:D9C0 10:30, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mark Kern.jpg[edit]

I'm not convinced that this is the uploaders own work, as it looks like a selfie by Kern. Additionally I've been able to find this image used several years before the given date (e.g. 29 Mar 2020), and while I can't find the original source it surgests that the uploader doesn't have this data. Cakelot1 ☞️ talk 10:47, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Caron état civil.png[edit]

This file was initially tagged by Gyrostat as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Scan of an official document, not own work. |source= No copyright, but why is this useful for Wikimedia projects? Yann (talk) 11:15, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:RPC Panama logo.svg[edit]

This file was initially tagged by Taichi as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: see source link Yann (talk) 11:16, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Download9.png[edit]

Small version of File:MYOB Logo.png, not in use Nutshinou Talk! 12:53, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Рельсотрон патрон.jpg[edit]

Possible/probable copyvio.

Similar in style to professionally shot and modified commercial image. Google shows numerous different language versions of this with otherwise near-identical setup (i.e. battery positioning and fake shading), something that would be unlikely if uploader had created this themselves. Also, this is uploader's only image, which tends to fit in with the "one-off copyvio uploader" pattern.

Also quite possibly derivative copyvio due to rabbit on pack. Ubcule (talk) 12:57, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Templates start with Template:Adm.nnov.ru[edit]

Template deleted in 2018. Should the subpages be deleted?

Phương Linh (talk) 13:26, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Medri Bahri.png[edit]

Reason: I don't know if this should be deleted, merged with FIle:Mereb Melash.png and used as a redirect or if there are any other options but the person who created this map made it believing the Medri Bahri was a separate polity from the Ethiopian Empire. I created my own version with it as a region of the larger state not realizing this. I don't think I can add my image from 8 days ago to this one and overwrite the article seeing as I didn't create it and would have to ask for permission, but that would mean I have to get that upload deleted otherwise there would be two, no? So this image is both mislabeled as the area is called Mereb Melash on English Wikipedia and it is not an actual historical kingdom so the image is false. The only time it could have been considered independent is during the Ottoman conquest of Eritrea when the leader Bahr Negus Yishaq sided with the ottomans but they had already set up a base in Massawa and taken control of surrounding environs so that makes this map's territory false, along with that it's supposed to be based on the regions extent in the 1520s (on the eve of the Ethiopian-Adal war, which according to most sources, the Medri Bahri either remained a part of the Ethiopian Empire or assisted their Muslim foes during. MotorolaBoy (talk) 23:56, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dervish somali flag.webp[edit]

Reason: Not only is this image not in use, which I have informed disqualified files from being put under the criteria of speedy deletion, but every aspect of it is patently false. First, the Dervish state was never referred to as the "Huwan,' nor was it split in two. that name belongs to the arid region in between Ethiopia and the De-facto independent state of Somaliland, which is only one part of the territory controlled by the Dervish althugh this is due to edits by another user and wasn't on the original map. Second, it was never as large as this, nomadic in nature and centered in the deep interior of the Somali peninsula, they were able to threaten Ethiopian controlled Jijiga to the east and British controlled Berbera to the north but took neither. The rebellion was strictly centered in a landlocked region and didn't border Dire Dawa or Harar to the was, nor did it have a perfectly straight border to the north as is shown.. A more accurate map of the Somali Dervishes would be something such as File:Somali Dervish Map.png, File:Mullah.PNG, or File:Beesha Daraawiish (Dhulbahante).png which were created by User:Axnooqabonooh, who seems to have exclusively uploaded content related to the Dervish in the past. On top of all that, the map is misnamed as "Somali Flag," when the veracity of the other flag upload is debatable. Much like other images by creator User:Joshuamatt20 such as File:Oromo migration.png, File:Dervish Somali flag.png, and File:Ajuran Empire map.jpg‎, this map should be deleted as it isn't based on historical evidence but rather personal research and has multiple flaws. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MotorolaBoy (talk • contribs) 23:54, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ajuran Empire map.jpg[edit]

Reason: Not only is this image not in use, which I have informed disqualified files from being put under the criteria of speedy deletion, but every aspect of it is patently false. First, Ajuran was never referred to as the "Ajuuran Empire,' which is why that name was removed from the Ajuran Empire's English Wikipedia page. Second, it was never spelled "Ajuuran," just "Ajuran" or the Somali spelling of "Ajuuraan." Third, many of the cities shown on the map do not date back to the Ajuran state at it's peak. Finally, the Ajuran state never extended that far north along the Somali coast and this image has it's western border as far as harage or Bale in Ethiopia, which conflicts with all historical sources in regards to Ethiopia or Adal. That is a mistake on the map of the polity on the wikipedia page too. A map such as File:Ajuuraan & Adal map.png which was previously in use would be more accurate. Much like other images by creator User:Joshuamatt20 such as File:Oromo migration.png, File:Dervish Somali flag.png, and File:Dervish somali flag.webp, this map should be deleted as it isn't based on historical evidence but rather personal research and has multiple flaws. MotorolaBoy (talk) 23:58, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Afriqueest05.gif[edit]

Reason: This is just the Turkish version of File:Ajuran Empire map.jpg, which is already not in use (what I have informed disqualifies files from being put under the criteria of speedy deletion) but every aspect of it is also patently false. First, Ajuran was never referred to as the "Ajuuran Empire,' which is why that name was removed from the Ajuran Empire's English Wikipedia page. Second, it was never spelled "Ajuuran," just "Ajuran" or the Somali spelling of "Ajuuraan." Third, many of the cities shown on the map do not date back to the Ajuran state at it's peak. Finally, the Ajuran state never extended that far north along the Somali coast and this image has it's western border as far as harage or Bale in Ethiopia, which conflicts with all historical sources in regards to Ethiopia or Adal. That is a mistake on the map of the polity on the wikipedia page too. A map such as File:Ajuuraan & Adal map.png which was previously in use would be more accurate. Much like other images by creator User:Joshuamatt20 such as File:Oromo migration.png, File:Dervish Somali flag.png, and File:Dervish somali flag.webp, this map should be deleted as it isn't based on historical evidence but rather personal research and has multiple flaws. MotorolaBoy (talk) 23:59, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Kwozyn (talk · contribs)[edit]

Per COM:FOP Vietnam.

Phương Linh (talk) 15:03, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tôi không quan tâm. Cứ tiếp tục như những gì mà bạn muốn. Tôi hiểu Wikipedia có rất nhiều điều luật để đảm bảo tôn trọng quyền và lợi ích tối đa của các bên, nên nếu các bạn thấy việc này là đúng thì cứ xóa. Tôi không có ý kiến và tôi không quan tâm (như đã nói ở trên). Kwozyn (talk) 15:17, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment Has to be decided case by case. Not all of them are FOP issues. -- Herbert Ortner (talk) 17:39, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Files uploaded by Tharindu Dias Official (talk · contribs)[edit]

Unless the uploader has drawn these logos from scratch, the copyright belongs to the original creators.

See COM:SEAL.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 15:19, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Almaz Zaripov (talk · contribs)[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused screenshots of software of questionable notability.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:04, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Discord Wordmark.png[edit]

Identical to File:Discord colour textlogo (2021).svg, not in use Nutshinou Talk! 17:06, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Cahit.obruk (talk · contribs)[edit]

Unused personal files

Nutshinou Talk! 17:10, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lurasidone 2.png[edit]

Unused render from a 1200px thumbnail of File:Lurasidone.svg, no use Nutshinou Talk! 17:18, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Paptilian (talk · contribs)[edit]

Out of scope screenshots of personal project.

William Graham (talk) 17:30, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Céško.png[edit]

Low-quality cropped screenshot of letters. It has no value, especially since we have much better images covering the topic. Filipny (talk) 17:40, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pow Wow 2016 Wendake in Quebec Canada.jpg[edit]

Dieses Bild habe ich versehentlich ein zweites Mal auf Wikimedia geladen. Es ist bereits vorhanden unter File:Pow-Wow Wendake Canada 2016.jpg Marc-Lautenbacher (talk) 18:46, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Uploader says it's a duplicate, but it's still COM:INUSE at en:Dance in Canada as well as some Commons pages. --Rosenzweig τ 18:48, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Rosenzweig, yes I know. But I will replace thé crurent image with the duplicate - File:Pow-Wow Wendake Canada 2016.jpg Marc-Lautenbacher (talk) 18:52, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Better do it now, or the file will probably be not deleted. --Rosenzweig τ 19:46, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by ImaViking (talk · contribs)[edit]

Possible copyvio: Logo of a band

CoffeeEngineer (talk) 19:13, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:EifachBEN Hauptbild.jpg[edit]

Possible copyvio: Seems suspectly close to its picture on the Sony website https://www.sonymusic.ch/eifachben-veroffentlicht-seine-neue-single-ozean/ CoffeeEngineer (talk) 19:16, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gibão de prata.jpg[edit]

Possible copyvio: The band is marked as the author CoffeeEngineer (talk) 19:25, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by ImoteSokoli (talk · contribs)[edit]

These files, showing drawings of Croatian kings and dukes, were apparently taken from a web site named as njuškalo.com, which is probably [1], a Croatian web site where stuff is sold. Something like Ebay or Amazon Marketplace perhaps. So they're probably taken from some book, map or print sold there, but that book/print/whatever is not named, so there is no proper source for the images.

They're said to be from 1925 and were uploaded with {{PD-US}} tags. While they most likely are in the PD in the US if published in 1925, they don't look like they are from a US publication, so that is not enough, they also must be in the public domain in their source country, presumably Croatia. If the artist who created these died after 1953 (entirely possible), they are still protected by copyright in their source country.

The files should therefore be deleted per the precautionary principle unless we get proper and satisfacory information about the actual source and author and it is demonstated that they are in the public domain in their source country (or under a free license).

Rosenzweig τ 19:45, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Kaykrause (talk · contribs)[edit]

Possible copyvio: Pictures for music albums

CoffeeEngineer (talk) 19:53, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Die Fotos sind beide von mir persönlich und dem Ensemble IOCULATORES aufgenommen worden. Kaykrause (talk) 21:47, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Aber haben Sie die Rechte? Wenn Ja, könnten Sie ein OTSR Request öffnen bitte: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Wikimedia_VRT_release_generator]? CoffeeEngineer (talk) 23:19, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Altaf Hussain cropped.jpg[edit]

Does VOA have the copyright of this painting?! 200.39.139.14 21:14, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello? Anyone there? 200.39.139.14 21:24, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sapung cartoon.svg[edit]

In retrospect, the image does not add any encyclopedic value Psubhashish (talk) 21:26, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:India P1130327 (6579654363).jpg[edit]

Out of Scope Perumalism (talk) 21:47, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:India P1130328 (6579655143).jpg[edit]

Out of Scope Perumalism (talk) 21:47, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:India P1130361 (6579657501).jpg[edit]

Out of Scope Perumalism (talk) 21:48, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:India P1130363 (6579658345).jpg[edit]

Out of Scope Perumalism (talk) 21:48, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:India P1130321 (6579652083).jpg[edit]

Out of Scope Perumalism (talk) 21:48, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, she is not Indira Gandhi. 200.39.139.14 21:32, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:India P1130322 (6579652745).jpg[edit]

Out of Scope Perumalism (talk) 21:48, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Arba Kokalari, Member of the European Parliament.jpg[edit]

possible copyvio (c) Stavros Tzovaras M2k~dewiki (talk) 22:58, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Then the author is not Moderate Party of Sweden. Delete. 200.39.139.14 21:50, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Steamos-big-picture.png[edit]

Unlikely to be screenshot of own work Trade (talk) 23:33, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Carte départements France.png[edit]

This map has a bad projection, a wrong title, and is an unused file. Damouns இ 12:49, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Deletion_requests/2024/04/06&oldid=874721350"