Commons:Deletion requests/2024/05/03

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

May 3[edit]

File:1907-ci ildə B.jpg[edit]

1907 photograph that appears to have been created in the UK. Possibly public domain but uploader would need to show that they did research and could not find the author. Abzeronow (talk) 00:28, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Quotation from the Template:PD-UK-Unknown:
This UK artistic or literary work, of which the author is unknown and cannot be ascertained by reasonable enquiry, is in the public domain because it is one of the following:
  • A photograph, which has never previously been made available to the public (e.g. by publication or display at an exhibition) and which was taken more than 70 years ago (before 1 January 1954); or
  • A photograph, which was made available to the public (e.g. by publication or display at an exhibition) more than 70 years ago (before 1 January 1954); or
An artistic work other than a photograph (e.g. a painting), or a literary work, which was made available to the public (e.g. by publication or display at an exhibition) more than 70 years ago (before 1 January 1954).
This photograph of a first of its kind event in England was certainly distributed to the Scouts in the photo and others, which in the United States is considered "publication." So, PD in the U.S. and above PD in the U.K.
Why is this a Deletion Request @Abzeronow? You wrote, "uploader would need to show that they did research and could not find the author." Where are the written guidelines for an "uploader" "to show that they did research"? Please, link to an example of an old photo that shows such research.
 Keep per above. Am I missing something here @Richard Arthur Norton (1958- )? Ooligan (talk) 16:40, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Ooligan, The line "cannot be ascertained by reasonable enquiry" means research beyond a web search because the copyright law on this was written before the widespread adoption of the Internet. We also lack a source to establish when this was published. Abzeronow (talk) 16:46, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Reasonable enquiry: Asking for more research beyond Google Image search and Tineye is demanding a higher level of burden of proof than has been required in the past. You can always move the goalposts further no matter what we find, because it is impossible to prove a negative. No matter how many rocks we look under, you can always demand we keep looking under more rocks. I think searching 14 billion images with Tineye and Google meets the due diligence legal requirement of the license as a "reasonable enquiry", and the Precautionary Principle requires positive evidence that the image violates the license. --RAN (talk) 17:35, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    • I only just noticed that you did add a source that wasn't there before, which does support publication in the UK from 1907 to 1910. This is good, it helps establish that this may in fact have an unknown author, although why you couldn't have mentioned that you added a source is beyond me. Web searches alone are not sufficient for the simple reason that not all photographic works are on the Internet and for some photographs, identifying information is on the photo itself but in too low a resolution to be legible. And for the record, usually we have a reliable source tell us something has an unknown, untraceable author or the uploader gives us enough information to reasonably determine that a work is in fact anonymous. Abzeronow (talk) 16:55, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:LG Twin Tower in Yeouido (cropped).jpg[edit]

Violation of architectural copyright, No commons allowable FOP in South Korea. Seawolf35 (talk) 01:19, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rob Louw 2024.jpg[edit]

Photo on Flickr has a Cornerstone Institute watermark, and the photo also says "courtesy Cornerstone Institute". We would need VRT permission from Cornerstone since PDMark is not a license (and this is not an own work by the Flickr uploader). Leoboudv (talk) 02:00, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:4 Șoseaua Pavel D. Kiseleff, Bucharest (05).jpg[edit]

Copyrighted image Neoclassicism Enthusiast (talk) 02:21, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:8567 19 a.k.a.a.f.alf.jpg[edit]

Out of scope: unused photograph of a QR code linking to http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Main_Page. Omphalographer (talk) 03:26, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Omnirooms.png[edit]

COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by company; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 03:28, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bydzyne logo.jpg[edit]

COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by likely company rep; no usage outside spammy sandbox, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 03:41, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Mb.veratics (talk · contribs)[edit]

COM:SPAM, promotional images uploaded by likely company rep; no usage, out of scope

Gnomingstuff (talk) 03:41, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

logo of a company that seems to exist ( https://nvsbc.org/govets/ ) is in com:scope. RZuo (talk) 07:26, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Farmthru Logo.jpg[edit]

COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by company; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 03:42, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Logo isa pantaleao fundo preto.jpg[edit]

COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by company; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 03:42, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:CyrusCraftrs Logo.png[edit]

COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by likely company rep (username suggests paid article writing); no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 03:43, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gral Albania.jpg[edit]

COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by company; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 03:46, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Anak Sago (talk · contribs)[edit]

Doubt these are own work. Varying sizes and quality, no metadata. Uploader has a history of works of others as own work.

--Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 03:54, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Aether Logo small.jpg[edit]

Non-photographs should not be in JPG. Redundant to File:Aether Logo.png. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 04:08, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:AGT-digital-transparent.jpg[edit]

Non-photographs should not be in JPG. Redundant to File:AGT-digital-transparent.png. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 04:10, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Akfa logo.png[edit]

Unused, superseded by File:AKFA logo-01.svg. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 04:11, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Laianatura (talk · contribs)[edit]

Seems out of scope

--Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 04:15, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Apelby logo.jpg[edit]

Non-photographs should not be in JPG. Redundant to File:Apelby logo.png. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 04:19, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by BJNPROPERTY (talk · contribs)[edit]

Used for spam on th.wp

--Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 04:22, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:河内成幸.jpg[edit]

simlr https://twitter.com/Seiko_Kawachi eien20 (talk) 04:22, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Appota-logo.png[edit]

Unused, redundant to File:Appota logo.svg. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 04:26, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Appota official logo.jpg[edit]

Unused, redundant to File:Appota logo.svg. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 04:26, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Oreitravel.png[edit]

COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by company; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 04:38, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Lea.anthonioz (talk · contribs)[edit]

COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by likely company rep; no usage outside spam user sandbox, out of scope

Gnomingstuff (talk) 04:39, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ahmet Cetin Yazilim (Software).png[edit]

COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by company; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 04:40, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:R.A.R.E logo.svg[edit]

COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by likely company rep; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 04:41, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Logo VINADY goREISE.jpg[edit]

COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by company; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 04:51, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Uddy vances (talk · contribs)[edit]

COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by likely company rep; no usage outside spammy sandbox, out of scope

Gnomingstuff (talk) 04:52, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Metolite1032 (talk · contribs)[edit]

COM:SPAM, promotional images uploaded by likely company rep; no usage, out of scope

Gnomingstuff (talk) 04:59, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by SiliconnValley (talk · contribs)[edit]

COM:SPAM, promotional images uploaded by likely company rep; no usage, out of scope

Gnomingstuff (talk) 05:01, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Best Red Magnum.png[edit]

COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by company; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 05:16, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Landious travel logo.jpg[edit]

COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by company; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 05:22, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Leader finder logo.jpg[edit]

COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by company; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 05:23, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Suraj2610 (talk · contribs)[edit]

COM:SPAM, promotional images uploaded by likely company rep; no usage, out of scope

Gnomingstuff (talk) 05:24, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ryan Bundy.png[edit]

Not sure if license is valid; website does not state anything about it being public domain, only that it is available to the public. New Jersey is not a state where government works are public domain reppoptalk 05:37, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Camille Etienne.jpg[edit]

Not the uploader's original work; a similar shot have been posted on several websites ([1] [2]), which credit Solal Moisan. This file also lacks EXIF data. doclys (❀) 06:15, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:鬼羅連合白龍九十九里総本部.jpg[edit]

無断転載が発覚した為。 KILLER.Group.in.CHIBA (talk) 11:52, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 21:08, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:鬼羅連合白龍九十九里総本部.jpg[edit]

どうしても削除したい KILLER.Group.in.CHIBA (talk) 06:54, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:鬼羅連合 白龍 九十九里総本部 2.jpg[edit]

無断転載が発覚した為。 KILLER.Group.in.CHIBA (talk) 11:53, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 21:08, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:鬼羅連合 白龍 九十九里総本部 2.jpg[edit]

どうしても削除したい KILLER.Group.in.CHIBA (talk) 06:55, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:鬼羅連合 白龍 九十九里総本部.jpg[edit]

無断転載が発覚した為。 KILLER.Group.in.CHIBA (talk) 11:51, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@KILLER.Group.in.CHIBA: どういう意味ですか?誰かがこの写真を無断につかっていますか?そうなら、それは消す理由ではありません。(English: What does this mean? Is someone using this photo in an unauthorized manner? If so, that's not a reason to delete it.) holly {chat} 01:14, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 21:07, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:鬼羅連合 白龍 九十九里総本部.jpg[edit]

どうしても削除したい KILLER.Group.in.CHIBA (talk) 06:56, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Fresque en hommage à Federico Martín Aramburú au stade Aguilera de Biarritz.jpg[edit]

Possible copyvio: Il n'y a pas de liberté de panorama en France CoffeeEngineer (talk) 08:06, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Même avis que sur Commons:Deletion requests/File:Fresque en mémoire de Federico Martín Aramburú rue du Centre à Biarritz.jpg : copyvio probable (Commons:Copyright rules by territory/France). - Daxipedia - 達克斯百科 (d) 18:29, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pablo Picasso, 1923 (51531863156).jpg[edit]

Not in public domain : Picasso died less than 70 years ago Zen 38 (talk) 08:07, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


File:Pablo Picasso's ceramic1.jpg[edit]

Not in public domain : Picasso died less than 70 years ago Zen 38 (talk) 08:08, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


File:Pablo Picasso's ceramic2.jpg[edit]

Not in public domain : Picasso died less than 70 years ago Zen 38 (talk) 08:08, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


File:Open Window on the Rue de Penthièvre (1920) Pablo Picasso - TMoCA, Tehran.jpg[edit]

Not in public domain : Picasso died less than 70 years ago Zen 38 (talk) 08:09, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


File:TeteDeTaureauPicasso.png[edit]

Not in public domain : Picasso died less than 70 years ago Zen 38 (talk) 08:11, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


File:Borah Productions logo.png[edit]

Possible copyvio: Logo of a company CoffeeEngineer (talk) 08:23, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Layout-of-FreeCell-Solitaire-game.jpg[edit]

Unlikely to be own work; probably self-made (or not even self-made) screenshot of an application developed by someone else. We don’t know what application this is, so we can’t be sure if it’s freely licensed (probably it isn’t). Tacsipacsi (talk) 08:27, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Thomas Weikert.jpg[edit]

see EXIF: Copyright holder "Michael Reichel / DOSB", no permission via COM:VRT DCB (talk) 08:36, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Torsten Burmester Foto DOSB Frank May 52 FM6 6738.jpg[edit]

see EXIF: Copyright holder "DOSB/Frank May", no permission via COM:VRT DCB (talk) 08:37, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files in Category:Brazil Pavilion at EXPO 2020[edit]

The only thing in these images of note is the screens, so this is a DW of the images on those screens.

The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:41, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kwong Siew Association of Thailand Emblem.gif[edit]

Above COM:TOO logo Wutkh (talk) 08:41, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kınalıada Kedisi (20230127).jpg[edit]

Scope. Commons is no repository for cute cat images. (Auto import from flickr) 82.135.82.154 08:42, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Burgazada - panoramio (5).jpg[edit]

SCOPE. (Imported automatically from panoramio) 82.135.82.154 08:48, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Recueil - de - Diverses pieces - Sur la - Musique - btv1b105391047 (056 of 391).jpg[edit]

Empty page. Possibly out of scope. Jarash (talk) 08:56, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Boushra Yahya Almutawakel.png[edit]

Copyright violation, this image is traced from the photograph shown i.e. here https://hauteliving.com/2015/02/boushra-almutawakel/549211/. There is no proof that the original photograph is under a free license. The previous deletion request was because it was unclear whether the uploader was the person who painted the picture - this is a different cause. Ailura (talk) 09:11, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion was denied by @Yann: --Ailura (talk) 16:39, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep This is sufficiently different to be OK. Please note that this is not copied from the Internet. The uploader is the artist. Yann (talk) 16:43, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The Uploader is the tracer. The Photographer who created this image is not named. Ailura (talk) 17:18, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Ailura: What are you talking about? The Photographer of what? Yann (talk) 21:45, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The Photographer of the copied image [3]. Ailura (talk) 07:01, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The image is not copied, that is the point. Yann (talk) 09:05, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
So you suggest that the uploader met Mrs. Almutawakel together with the photographer and painted her in the very same moment the photographer took the picture? Painting from photographs is copyright infringement, see e.g. here [4]. --Ailura (talk) 19:12, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This is not the only source of the artwork. Painting from several sources can be done if artwork is not an exact copy of the source. We have many examples of that on Commons. Yann (talk) 21:00, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I don't see any part of this image that could possibly be from any other source. This is clearly a copy with some very small inaccuracies from the painting process, probably even too small for being a derivative work. Your other wrong decisions should be reviewed too. Ailura (talk) 08:26, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Norwegian Harbour Oslo Opera Sculpture.JPG[edit]

Copyright violation. No FOP in Norway for sculptures, not so prominent as in this photo. JopkeB (talk) 09:13, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Nightlovellt.jpg[edit]

May be a publicity photo, doubtful that the uploader was a publicist wanting this image attributed to a Commons username: https://www.inkedauthentics.com/products/night-lovell-signed-autographed-8x10-photo-beckett-bas-authenticated-3 Belbury (talk) 09:43, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Angela Barnes Comedian.jpg[edit]

Previously posted online without a free licence at https://twitter.com/AngelaBarnes/status/1458218088575475713/photo/1, requires a clear statement of permission (see COM:VRT) if Barnes is now releasing this selfie under a CC licence. Belbury (talk) 09:50, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:JRW 227-500 interior.jpg[edit]

肖像権上の理由であまり望ましくない画像であったため Keeteria (talk) 10:29, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Le imprese associate a Federdistribuzione.jpg[edit]

Out of the project scope, unused collection of logos Nutshinou Talk! 10:36, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Muhammad Mehdi Pukhtoon.jpg[edit]

No indicatioɳ, EXIF or otherwise, that this user has rights to this image. A fairly obvious AI generated, or heavily computer manipulated image, which may be suitable for discussion as to its validity or usefulness. Acabashi (talk) 10:41, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:DYLAN COLLINS - NOBILITY HISTORY TEXTBOOK REFERENCE- NEW YORK CITY HISTORY TRUST.jpg[edit]

Previously deleted vanity image of an obvious posturing nonentity. We are not a depository for spam personal pictures Acabashi (talk) 10:44, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have attached the New York City History Trust and Commission in the link. https://www.linkedin.com/in/richard-pyszczek-80375a79?utm_source=share&utm_campaign=share_via&utm_content=profile&utm_medium=ios_app You may email him directly and ask about my notoriety. I’m an elite family. I’m a direct descendant of John Collins - founding father of the United States and can provide geanologicai proof. I’m also a celebrity working with Disney on my own show. You can follow me on Twitter @dylancollins95 I have a previous tour history with Justin Biebers first girlfriend, Austin Mahone, Justin’s friend circle, and Mitchel Musso Disney Channel Hannah Montana Tour. [5]https://glamourfame.com/celebrity-entertainer-dylan-collins-mitchell-musso-spill-tea-their-south-american-tour#google_vignette
Please be very professional with your emails with any questions you may have to NYC History Trust captrsp@gmail.com Dylancollins1995 (talk) 10:54, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Also add these for deletion for broadly the same problemː

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:DYLAN_COLLINS_-_NOBILITY_HISTORY_TEXTBOOK_REFERENCE-_NEW_YORK_CITY_HISTORY_TRUST.png

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Noble_Dylan_Collins_-_Bloodline.jpg

 Delete per nom. --Achim55 (talk) 20:30, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete No evidence of notability. https://www.imdb.com/name/nm4848966/ is his IMDB page, but isn't exactly impressive. Being one of the 100,000 (back of the envelope calculation) descendants of a signer of the Articles of Confederation isn't notable, either.--Prosfilaes (talk) 22:41, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Schronisko skałka pożar.jpg[edit]

Copyvio from the mountain hut's very own website, see: [6]. Aʀvєδuι + 10:59, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pavarie logo.svg[edit]

This file was initially tagged by Billinghurst as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Work has artistic merit; incorrect to claim that geometric only Yann (talk) 11:19, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Even though this logo is created by simply curves.
Luke atlas (talk) 13:48, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Abdul Gaffar.jpg[edit]

No indication that the uploader has rights to the two elements in this mash-up image. Default position is probably copyvio. Acabashi (talk) 11:19, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Abdul Gaffa2.jpg[edit]

No indication that the uploader has rights to the two elements in this mash-up image. Default position is probably copyvio Acabashi (talk) 11:20, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:FitbitcloCls.jpg[edit]

Photo of File:Fitbitclocksapp.jpg, low quality, unused, etc. Nutshinou Talk! 11:24, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ashish lodhi 2.jpg[edit]

Out of scope 'some happy moments' personal album style vanity pick. Acabashi (talk) 11:30, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Also nominated for deletion for the same reasonː

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Uv_2.jpg

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Tv_4.jpg

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Ashish_lodhi.jpg

File:ז. מ. מימון.jpg[edit]

Per COM:SCOPE doclys (❀) 11:35, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Funkin Combat.gif[edit]

Seems to be out of scope, only one result (of a video with <100 views) for "Funkin Combat" "Strexx" Nutshinou Talk! 11:55, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:GraevenitzEngelDesGerichts.JPG[edit]

copyvio; artist died in 1959; no fop. Martin Sg. (talk) 12:03, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Podmiotowość prawa w państwie konstytucyjnym.pdf[edit]

This is my own work. I do not want it to be public anymore. Mrozinskijj (talk) 12:28, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Statues of Olmedo[edit]

Alberto Olmedo lived from 1933 to 1988, and he became a hit in the 1980s. There's no need to check the sculptors of these statues and busts: there is just no way they could have died more than 70 years ago for PD-old to apply, the dates just don't allow it. --Cambalachero (talk) 12:33, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Libraa2019 (talk · contribs)[edit]

unlikely own work . the user is socking on English WP

Saqib (talk) 13:04, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Osei Sumaila (talk · contribs)[edit]

Personal files only uploaded for use in a now-deleted self-promotional page on Wikipedia (w:en:Draft:Kulxt). Outside of COM:SCOPE.

Marbletan (talk) 13:13, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pencil Dick.jpg[edit]

Revenge porn Kskensinrtrograd (talk) 13:49, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Amoniche M Madadulah (Amo Tz).jpg[edit]

Unused and out of scope personal album style vanity image. Acabashi (talk) 14:01, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:NPG-NPG 87 210Williams-000001.jpg[edit]

Seems to be under copyright of Man Ray Trust (not published until after 1929 perhaps?) according to National Portrait Gallery:

© 2000 Man Ray Trust / Artists Rights Society, NY / ADAGP, Paris

Reproduction, including downloading of Man Ray works is prohibited by copyright laws and international conventions without the express written permission of Artists Rights Society (ARS), New York AbsoluteWissen (talk) 14:15, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Alamanoeducacionfinanciera (talk · contribs)[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:25, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Ikertelle (talk · contribs)[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagrams.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:56, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Yuliana Slashcheva, 2018.jpg[edit]

Professional photo, missing original EXIF, uploaded by single edit account, likely not own work. Available at [7] 188.123.231.2 15:00, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Kaqersky (talk · contribs)[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons:What Commons is not#Wikimedia Commons is not your personal free web host. Not used or used in vanity draft. =

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:01, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category talk:Carl Wilhelm Holdermann[edit]

No discussion. Established 1620 (talk) 15:09, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jade Ping-ay (talk · contribs)[edit]

Subject of these images is an unnotable individual, see w:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Waldimar Ping-ay. May fall out of COM:SCOPE and fail COM:EDUSE. Also, I suspect these are not self-photographed images of User:Jade Ping-ay: who is /are the real photographers? File:Ping-ay Waldimar.jpg seems to be COM:ADVERT too, uploaded for purpose of promotion (not educational value). Same as File:Action Man Jaguar Joe A Biography.pdf which promotes the subject, especially our next elections is nearing.

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 04:14, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted other than one in use in en:w. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 03:56, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Jade Ping-ay (talk · contribs)[edit]

COM:DW, missing original author, source, date, and permission.

P 1 9 9   15:29, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ilocano Volleyball Player.png[edit]

Unused photo of non-notable person, no educational value, out of scope. And likely screengrab, note the border at bottom. P 1 9 9   15:31, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by MissUniverse 19 (talk · contribs)[edit]

Likely not own works: low-res/web-size screengrab images with disparate quality and styles, missing or inconsistent EXIF data, several with watermark crediting someone else. Too many found on other websites with Google Lens or TinEye - I gave up checking...

P 1 9 9   15:41, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Logo de Yerson Baena.jpg[edit]

out of scope, logo of non-notable musical group. Grandmaster Huon (talk) 15:41, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cookpad logo.svg[edit]

chef's hat is a borderline TOO case. Grandmaster Huon (talk) 15:42, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:SouvCard 1981 GDR 20yearsAKLD pm B002.jpg[edit]

Per Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Germany German stamps are copyrighted per the normal term of 70 years after the publication date or artist's death. It's possible the photograph in this stamp is PD since the person died in 1964, but the artwork of the plane flying in front of the buildings likely wouldn't be anyway. So the image should be deleted as COPYVIO unless someone can provide evidence to the contrary. Adamant1 (talk) 16:02, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


File:Mario Galindo Rojas.jpg[edit]

No free license. Copied directly from: https://galindoingenieria.com/?page_id=216 Wikidasher (talk) 16:15, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bayrakdbnfrber nre brghe.webp[edit]

Duplicate of File:Flag of Turkey.svg. Fry1989 eh? 16:18, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Flag of the People's Republic of China 2.webp[edit]

Duplicate of File:Flag of the People's Republic of China.svg. Fry1989 eh? 16:42, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Zee hamid.png[edit]

Image of unverifiable copyright status. It's claimed as CC/own work, but it was copied directly from the subject's own campaign site at https://milton.ontariopc.ca/ , with absolutely no verification provided that the uploader was the rightful holder of any copyrights on it (as opposed to just downloading it from a Google search). Even if they are a representative of the campaign, they'd still have to file confirmation of that with OTRS before we could use it here, and since they've also recently uploaded photos through the same "taken directly from campaign materials or the legislative assembly itself" process of a couple of former MPPs for a different party than Hamid's, it's not patently obvious that they're a representative of the campaign. Bearcat (talk) 16:44, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Uspensky-media (talk · contribs)[edit]

Low-res photos: given the descriptions, made by different people. Uploaded by user whose nickname matches with the modern media agency name.

Quick1984 (talk) 16:50, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Americana22ount (talk · contribs)[edit]

Architectural copyright violation. Buildings unlikely to be authored by architects who died more than 50 years ago. As there is no freedom of panorama in the Philippines, commercial license clearances from the architects/building designers or their heirs are required.

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 01:02, 5 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. plicit 03:32, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Americana22ount (talk · contribs) 2[edit]

COM:DW, photos of existing photos, missing original author, source, date, and permission.

P 1 9 9   17:00, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Toll John.jpg[edit]

No indication that the image was released under the CC BY-SA at the source link Guerillero Parlez Moi 17:31, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Koutaïssi (Kutaisi), Géorgie 1.jpg[edit]

There is no freedom of panorama in Georgia. Maybe the photo violates author's copyright. Does the thing surpass threshold of originality? Taivo (talk) 17:42, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Acampamento nelson mandela rocha leao.jpg[edit]

Foi feito upload por equivoco. Requer-se exclusão Rvlosznm (talk) 17:44, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files in Category:Untere Ranftkapelle[edit]

copyright violation; artist died in 1957 (i.e. public domain not before 2027); no freedom of panorama.

Martin Sg. (talk) 17:50, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


File:Jim?kim.png[edit]

Meme image CzarJobKhaya (talk) 17:51, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Pranav Mohanlal.jpg[edit]

DR started to verify claimed 'own work', as imho rather 'professional-looking' format and missing EXIF data, Roland zh (talk) 18:45, 11 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Please have the photographer confirm the license by following the instructions on COM:OTRS. --Storkk (talk) 09:51, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pranav Mohanlal.jpg[edit]

Uploaded on Flickr in 2021 on a blacklisted account. Uploaded on internet in 2020 https://www.instagram.com/vineesh_official/p/CCktw5oAizE/ MGA73 (talk) 17:52, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:PLANE CPL BRISTOL BOXKITE - EAGLE CUTAWAY 1961-02-09 V12 No 35 - ART BY ROY CROSS.jpg[edit]

Illustration from 1961 by en:Roy Cross (artist). Licensed PDM on Flickr but no proof that Flickr account is the copyright holder. MGA73 (talk) 17:58, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

My only response is that this scan is of such high quality that I reasoned that the poster had access to the original, or near, artwork, and therefore may be in a position to assert PDM, and I assumed good faith.Lestocq (talk) 15:13, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:ByteCraft Int.jpg[edit]

Only use was on a now-deleted spam page on en.wp. Just Step Sideways (talk) 18:04, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files in Category:Madonna, Pfarrkirche St. Mauritius, Dornach (Hans von Matt 1949)[edit]

copyvio, artist lived until 1985; no fop.

Martin Sg. (talk) 18:05, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


File:St.Josef Köniz (13).jpg[edit]

copyvio; artist died in 1985; no fop. Martin Sg. (talk) 18:07, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files in Category:Ulana Suprun[edit]

Per the license template on these images, "official documents of a political, legislative or administrative nature (laws, decrees, resolutions, court awards, State standards, etc.) issued by government authorities within their powers." I don't think that would cover documents from the Ministry of Education and Science about private persons though. As they aren't "official documents of a political, legislative or administrative nature." Maybe administrative, but it's a bit of a stretch. So these images should be deleted as COPYVIO unless someone can provide evidence to the contrary.

Adamant1 (talk) 18:07, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Files in Category:August Blaesi (Pfarrkirche St. Mauritius, Dornach)[edit]

copyvio; pd in 2049; no fop.

Martin Sg. (talk) 18:09, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


File:Canal 14.3.png[edit]

Neither es:Televisión en Chile nor en:List of television stations in Chile mentions TV channel 14.3. Notability is under doubt, maybe the logo is out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 18:13, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:PD-RU-exempt (cropped postal covers)[edit]

Cropping out artistic parts of postal covers and stamps is strictly prohibited by PD-RU-exempt (read the footnotes about cropping). These artistic renderings by themselves are protected by copyright until expiration, and none are old enough to have expired copyright yet. Until such time, the artists of these works, like Pyotr Bendel and Anatoly Kalashnikov, retain the rights to these works.

PlanespotterA320 (talk) 23:48, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

“read the footnotes about cropping” -- Which ‘footnotes’ are you talking about? Can you provide a link pls? --Gretarsson (talk) 23:56, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
They're referring to the copyright tag {{PD-RU-exempt}}. clpo13(talk) 02:36, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Gretarsson and Clpo13: this footnote is present in the English and German versions, but is missing in the Russian one. --VLu (talk) 08:57, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
OK, apparently you are referring to this: “This Russian official document, state symbol or sign (postage stamps, coins and banknotes mainly) may incorporate one or more works that can be copyrightable if separated from this document, symbol or sign. In such a case, this work is not an object of copyright if reused in its entirety but, at the same time, extracting specific portions from this work could constitute copyright infringement. For example, the denomination and country name must be preserved on postage stamps.
As far as I see it says “may” and “can”. Hence the general claim that “Cropping out artistic parts of postal covers and stamps is strictly prohibited by PD-RU-exempt” appears to be unfounded! So  Keep and decide/discuss case by case individually... --Gretarsson (talk) 13:54, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I agree to the deletion of Панкратова Анна Михайловна (конверт) cropped.jpg. I had not realized it was a copyright violation.--Ipigott (talk) 06:54, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Modern pentathlon[edit]

Modern pentathlon, World Cup, Saint-Petersburg, 1992

See also[edit]

  1. Commons:Village_pump/Copyright/Archive/2016/05#{{PD-RU-exempt}} for items that feature copyrighted work
  2. PierreSelim: Deleted: Only the entire post card is PD-RU-exempt.
  3. JuTa and Ellin Beltz: Kept: when the stamp is public domain, parts of it are public domain too.

--VLu (talk) 11:12, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • @PierreSelim, JuTa, and Ellin Beltz: Is it possible to count on a consolidated position of administrators when closing identical DRs? --VLu (talk) 11:41, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    • In regards to cases like File:1977 CPA 4774(Cutted).jpg - the administrators ruled incorrectly. That image of Brezhnev is copyrighted. Just because it is a grainy version from a postage stamp doesn't render it public domain. The image is a photoshopped version of the image of Brezhnev here that is copyrighted and will remain copyrighted for a long time (RIAN claims copyright of the original of the photo that was modified, and that photo will remain copyrighted for decades). Just because that image was put on a postage stamp doesn't mean it is stripped of copyright it previously held and is due to hold for the set period of time - artistic portions of stamps and postal covers ARE NOT PUBLIC DOMAIN. Neither of the ruling admins in that case had detailed knowledge of Russian copyright. Consensus of knowledgeable admins is that cropping out a copyrighted portion of a postage stamp or envelope is a copyright violation.--PlanespotterA320 (talk) 15:10, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  1. File:Yuriy Korneyevich Smolich (1).jpg - deletion note was "(Copyright violation: Crop og postal covers is not in PD)" by admin @Jcb: --PlanespotterA320 (talk) 15:36, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
      • The main question here should be if postal covers and stamps that contain copyrighted works are allowed at all. There is no dispute among those well aware of Russian copyright law that the images on stamps and postal covers are copyrighted. Hence cropping them out and using them alone is completely a copyright violation. Hence, should postal covers and stamps that contain works that are obviously still copyrighted - be such images by Ivan Shagin, Yevgeny Khaldei, Pyotr Bendel, Anatoly Kalashnikov, and other artists be allowed? Frankly the rampant extent of people cropping out the copyrighted portions is concerning. At the very least, I propose the PD-RU-exempt tag be modified so that a clearly visible warning against cropping postage stamps and postal covers is visible in when the the type=stamp or postal cover is invoked (perhaps with to include a de minimis tag). It certainly does appear, not just in this case, that users not reading the footnotes of copyright tags is a chronic issue (many people upload photos with just the PD-old-70 tag but to required county-specific tag contrary to the warning, many people ignore footnotes about posthumous publication in copyright tags, etc).--PlanespotterA320 (talk) 15:36, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I would certainly not object to a unified method of handling these kinds of files, and certainly stand to learn from whatever clearly defined guidelines are provided. I think this is an excellent practical and esoteric discussion, from which I am going to recuse myself until after the experts and Russian speaking users discuss first. Cheers! Everyone stay safe, don't get sick please!! Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:18, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Closing as stale. Can be renominated without prejudice. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 17:36, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Files in Category:PD-RU-exempt (cropped postal covers)[edit]

Per Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Russia and prior consensus "works still under copyright can be used by the Russian post, without altering the copyright status of the work used", but artwork can not be cropped from the postal card or cover. Otherwise it loses the status of being in the public domain. So these images should be deleted as COPYVIO unless someone can provide evidence to the contrary.

Adamant1 (talk) 18:14, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep. When the stamp or postal cover is public domain, parts of that stamp or postal cover is public domain too. Interfase (talk) 16:06, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Not according to the guideline and long standing consensus. I'm fine with leaving it up to whomever closes this though. But there's no reason a prior work that's already copyrighted would lose said copyright just because its reprinted on a postal cover. Especially if the actual postal cover is cropped out. That's not how things work. --Adamant1 (talk) 18:50, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I think that you wrongly understood the message of the guidelines. It clearly says that "PD-RU-exempt" license can be applied to such images because "we can safely assume that the Russian post has come to an agreement with the copyright-holder of such work". There is no any words that "artwork can not be cropped from the postal card or cover". Interfase (talk) 05:28, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The problem is that it also says "A copyrighted painting can be used on an envelope or such and "PD-RU-exempt" will apply, without turning the painting into a Public Domain work." So the artwork would still be copyrighted if not for inclusion, or being a part of, the envelope. You can't just crop an otherwise copyrighted work from something that is PD and then claim it doesn't revert back to the original copyright status. Like if it was a photograph on a postal cover that was still copyrighted outside of that, which we then cropped the surrounding postal envelope from, why would that magically be PD when it's essentially just the originally photograph at that point (Which again, is still copyrighted outside of and if not for the postal envelope)? --Adamant1 (talk) 06:28, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
But we do not upload the original artwork itself. The part of the cover was uploaded not the part of the original painting. If the original photo will be on the cover then we will safely assume that the Russian post has come to an agreement with the copyright-holder of this photo (like the rule says) and based on this we will upload this photo that is on cover without any copyright violation. Interfase (talk) 06:43, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It's still a derivative work though. Just because you reprint a painting in a different medium then the original doesn't mean it won't be copyrighted or that it can hosted on Commons. Otherwise you could make the same argument about a JPEG file of a painting versus the original canvas of it. That's not how this works. You can't claim something isn't copyrighted because it's not a 100% exact recreation of the work in the same original format or whatever. Nothing on here is and that's not how this works. We'll have to agree to disagree though. --Adamant1 (talk) 06:57, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
As I can understand, if the work is on the cover, which is in public domain, and if we can safely assume that the Russian post has come to an agreement with the copyright-holder of the work, then we can upload it to Commons under the same license. Interfase (talk) 07:08, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, as part of the cover. Not separately because it's still copyrighted. --Adamant1 (talk) 07:10, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Separated it is still the part of the cover and is not copyrighted. Interfase (talk) 09:03, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


File:Kath. Kirche Moutier (5).jpg[edit]

copyvio; contemp. artworks; no fop. Martin Sg. (talk) 18:18, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Files in Category:Ceiling of the auditorium of the Opéra Garnier[edit]

he auditorium is in the PD but the works of Marc Chagall, who died in 1985 not. There is no FoP in France, which has a standard of life + 70 years.

Paradise Chronicle (talk) 18:19, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


File:TRIUMPH SAINT 650cc POLICE SPECIAL1967.jpg[edit]

Scan of a drawing/magazine from 1967. No proof that flickr user is the copyright holder or that copyright expired. MGA73 (talk) 18:21, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I thought that a Flickr declaration of "public domain" xas enough. Must we check further when using such content? In the case of the precise drawing, it is most probably an extract of the Eagle comics in 1967, a famous >British review. Is a 57 year old UK publication now in public domain? Olinone (talk) 16:24, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Noč.jpg[edit]

noneducational cont. Ponor (talk) 18:46, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Prou.jpg[edit]

noneducational cont. Ponor (talk) 18:46, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Maciffrao (talk · contribs)[edit]

Out of scope: likely AI-generated (or AI-edited) paintings of historical leaders of Haiti. Notice in particular the bizarre mess of misshapen medals in portraits like File:Prince César Dessalines.jpg, File:Potrè Faustin anperé Ayiti.png, and File:Potrè Soulouque.png. Other images show more subtle signs of AI involvement, like the red and blue colors mysteriously appearing in the "engraving" File:Prens Cesar Dessalines, wa Lagonav.jpg or the abnormally photorealistic details in File:Potré Enperatris Marie Claire.jpg. The subject matter of these images is suspiciously similar to Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Chromjunuor and Commons:Deletion requests/File:General Nissage Saget of Haiti.jpg.

I realize that some of these images are currently in use, but there's clear reason to doubt that they're authentic, and all of them were inserted by an IP editor (probably the uploader) on a low-traffic wiki (htwiki). Unless someone can come forth with compelling evidence that these are real portraits, they should be removed.

Omphalographer (talk) 19:20, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Artigas Departament - Flag.svg[edit]

SVG de mala calidad, además de que ya hay un svg de esta misma bandera bien hecho. Half-Time919 (talk) 19:38, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Emre Aydın[edit]

I think we can redirect this page to Category:Emre Aydın Kurmanbek💬 20:00, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:ME-CFS symptoms according to 5 sets of criteria.pdf[edit]

Had a discussion on the Discord CCI channel: conclusion was that likely more deviation from the source is needed for copyright compliance (as the order of rows is "creative"). Also: pdf is not a great format, will try again to get in into svg. Femke (talk) 20:01, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Does this need to be an image at all? It could just as easily be a wiki table, and it'd be easier to edit in that format as well. Omphalographer (talk) 21:35, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hah, that's a smart move! I'm struggling with spaces being squashed away in the svg (hence my pdf), so this avoids tinkering any more with this. Femke (talk) 07:15, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Wen tsui chen (talk · contribs)[edit]

COM:SPAM, promotional images uploaded by likely company rep; no usage outside wikidata, out of scope

Gnomingstuff (talk) 20:03, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:서해의 묘소.jpg[edit]

No permission. Please delete. SeoJeongWon (talk) 20:22, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Porno[edit]

useless as a gallery (there's more to porn than cisgender hetero sex videos); borderline vandalism by new single issue editor (see also https://w.wiki/9xwo) -- Wutsje 20:23, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Merge/delete – Move files to (sub)categories of Category:Pornography.
Also what this gallery depicts is modern low-quality (in the context of porn quality) porn videos (well mostly videos and gifs that could also be called videos). Additionally, I don't think those male masturbation videos are porn. In any case, I'm against WMC becoming also a porn site, regardless whether such is "Low-quality" or not or whether it's "images" or other filetypes. Prototyperspective (talk) 22:07, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete. Sexually explicit media aren't necessarily out of scope on Commons, but they need to be handled in a way that focuses on educational use. Throwing them all into an indiscriminate collection of "porno" is quite the opposite of that. Omphalographer (talk) 23:47, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Palaigo (talk · contribs)[edit]

out of scope: this appears to be personal fiction; or at least these logos are unused and unexplained

Enyavar (talk) 20:54, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Deepskard (talk · contribs)[edit]

Suspected CopyVio: uploader claims own work on a satellite image of unknown origin

Enyavar (talk) 21:03, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:AStefanov.webp[edit]

Fake license. Wikisaurus (talk) 21:05, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Locaties turborotondes wereldwijd.png[edit]

CopyVio: ESRI satellite map is proprietary and not part of own work Enyavar (talk) 21:07, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Secretary Blinken Meets with Chinese Communist Party Secretary of Shanghai (53677543966).jpg[edit]

Likely modern copyrighted art derivative work per COM:DW Ooligan (talk) 21:43, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files in Category:Interior of World Conference Center Bonn (extension building)[edit]

There is no FoP for interior views in Germany. The building was inaugurated in 2015 and some of its architects are likely still alive. Germany has a standard of life + 70 years.

Paradise Chronicle (talk) 21:58, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Files uploaded by Sergey Puttov (talk · contribs)[edit]

Out of scope: Personal fiction

Enyavar (talk) 22:05, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Чем тебе не нравятся эти файлы? Я их ещë летом сделал, только ч думаю как их вставить на свои будущие страницы Sergey Puttov (talk) 09:55, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Please find out with Com:Scope, #"realistic educational purpose". - Enyavar (talk) 11:26, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Atelierequin (talk · contribs)[edit]

All of these have a source of "Guide de la Provence Mystérieuse", author "I.F.A.G", and a date of "20 April 1978". There is no reason to believe the CC-Zero template put on these, and a possibility they were all originally created for a 1978 work still in copyright.

Prosfilaes (talk) 22:07, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by VectorPerkins1 (talk · contribs)[edit]

Out of scope: Personal fiction

Enyavar (talk) 22:11, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hassan Chammout.jpg[edit]

Clear copyvio 200.39.139.24 22:13, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:حسن عريبي Hassan Aribi.jpg[edit]

Is he an artist? 200.39.139.24 22:16, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sheikh Muhammad Al Hassan Al-Dedew.png[edit]

Screenshot 200.39.139.24 22:17, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Hamza Izourane (talk · contribs)[edit]

Suspected CopyVios: Uploader claimed satellite imagery from unknown origins as own work

Enyavar (talk) 22:19, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files in Category:BMW Welt - interior[edit]

There is no FoP for interior views in Germany. The building was inaugurated in 2007 and de:Wolf D. Prix is still alive. Germany has a standard of life + 70 years.

Paradise Chronicle (talk) 22:32, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Files in Category:Interior of the Olympic Swim Hall, Munich[edit]

There is no FoP for interior views in Germany. The buildings architect Günther Domenig died in 2012 and Germany has a standard of life + 70 years.

Paradise Chronicle (talk) 22:52, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


File:也速該.jpg[edit]

Previously deleted under the name File:Yesugei Baghatur.jpg with rationale "Image lacks a source and author. Multiple image searches on 3rd party websites reveal no other version of image". AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 23:04, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]