Commons:Deletion requests/2024/04/03

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
2 April 2024
4 April 2024
Deletion requests on 3 April 2024

April 3[edit]

File:Der grosse strassburger hinkende Bote.jpg[edit]

Work by artist Tomi Ungerer (1931–2019), still protected by copyright in France. The file can be restored in 2090. Rosenzweig τ 00:24, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


File:DES CO OH.jpg[edit]

I suspect this is a copyvio given the lack of metadata and the iPhone XS screenshot size. I can find other uses of the image online but I suspect it was posted to Facebook/X and hence doesn't show in reverse image searches. Would be helpful if the supposed photographer could shed some light on this and perhaps upload the original file (if indeed they have it) rather than a screenshot of the photo taken on their phone. 5225C (talk • contributions) 02:25, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:ProROCK sunboy 2024.png[edit]

Несвободный файл Прикли (talk) 09:58, 3 April 2024 (UTC) Commons:Deletion requests/Événement Artistique.jpg Commons:Deletion requests/Chanteur Karkabou.jpg[reply]

File:WikiSS1.jpg[edit]

Video game screenshot Kirilloparma (talk) 02:48, 3 April 2024 (UTC) Commons:Deletion requests/Front de mer inférieure d'Oran, 2015.jpg[reply]

File:Oran-Mosquée de Sidi El Houarie copie.jpg[edit]

Oran-Mosquée de Sidi El Houarie copie Terki hassaine samir (talk) 02:53, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/Vue Panoramique Oran copie 2.jpg

File:Carte Géologique Oran.jpg[edit]

Motif de la suppression : Je souhaite supprimer la photo [Nom du fichier] de Wikimedia Commons pour les raisons suivantes : La carte n'est pas précise et devrait être actualisée. Demande de suppression : La carte présente des inexactitudes et n'est pas à jour. Je souhaite la supprimer pour qu'elle ne soit plus utilisée comme source d'information erronée. Terki hassaine samir (talk) 02:57, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:2019 sdcc vacation 20.jpg[edit]

These appear to be NECA statues of fictional characters, and the United States does not have freedom of panorama Di (they-them) (talk) 03:15, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:1 Million Cups Lehigh Valley Wednesday, April 27, 2022.jpg[edit]

Per a previous edit, "will no longer be used for future article" Johnj1995 (talk) 03:51, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Statue in park Nojukbong.jpg[edit]

Per COM:FOP SK, there is no freedom of panorama in South Korea for sculptures. ✗plicit 04:21, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


File:NCAHP logo colour.png[edit]

The logo of NCAHP used here is not genuine because government of India not released any logo yet. A state association has no right to display the logo of the commission. Union Ministry of Health and Family Welfare has not released any logo yet Citizen arindam (talk) 04:36, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Files in Category:Cable Street Mural[edit]

No FoP for "graphic works" such as posters or murals in the United Kingdom

A1Cafel (talk) 05:37, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


 Delete: All of these have the mural as the main subject, so COM:DM doesn't save them. --bjh21 (talk) 10:21, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Engelberthumperdink (talk · contribs)[edit]

No FoP in Russia for modern sculpture

Xunks (talk) 05:44, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete as there is no specific regulation scheme for orphan works in Russian law, therefore, the sculpture in question is still subject to copyright protection. Biathlon (talk) 11:30, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Почему эта номинация отдельно? Почему этот файл не на удалении? Это не авторское право резчика по камню? А почему файл другого автора не вынесли на удаление? @Bogdanov-62. Разве между этой фотографией и, например, моей фотографией под номером 1 есть какая-то разница? И там бюст, и тут бюст, примерно на одном и том же расстоянии. Удивительная избирательность. --Engelberthumperdink (talk) 14:04, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 10:46, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Engelberthumperdink (talk · contribs)[edit]

Derivatives of 2D and 3D artworks, copyright status is unclear, no FoP in Russia except architecture.

Quick1984 (talk) 06:04, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ваш дебилизм не знает границ. Engelberthumperdink (talk) 08:36, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Changa Application.png[edit]

COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by presumed company rep, no use outside old sandbox and out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 06:07, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Barn photo.jpg[edit]

seems to be image from 2020 with added watermarks, but listing is down so cannot confirm the original photographer; precautionary principle might apply especially since this seems spammy https://tineye.com/search/6fa760b8c1d3fdcbed01032106fc621746dd71eb?sort=crawl_date&order=asc&page=1 Gnomingstuff (talk) 06:09, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Päikesevarjutus tõrvas.jpg[edit]

No permission from the source A1Cafel (talk) 06:58, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:S.Rocks.Tech Logo.png[edit]

COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by company; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 07:29, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files in Category:Instantní polévky (Czech Republic)[edit]

unfree content per COM:PACKAGING

— Draceane talkcontrib. 07:47, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Q..jpg[edit]

Image looks too similar to stock flower photos found long before upload date in 2012. WindEwriX (talk) 07:54, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Varenimo (talk · contribs)[edit]

Images were taken from https://archive.org/details/nist-911 which states a public domain licence. The NIST website at https://www.nist.gov/world-trade-center-investigation/photos-videos-and-simulations says of its wider collection that Materials available in the repository may be protected by copyrights owned by private individuals or organizations, and may be subject to restrictions on use.

It's possible that the archive.org collection is an (officially or unofficially) curated subset of genuinely public domain images, but this seem contradicted by the fact that some of the photos in that archive have a bright red copyright watermark within the image (eg. https://archive.org/details/NIST_9-11_Release_39 which says © 2001. New York City Police Department. All rights reserved. Used with permission of the City of New York.) that contradicts the public domain licence being claimed.

Belbury (talk) 08:12, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User:Varenimo has posted on the talk page of this discussion page today to say that I got them from NIST release 31 and it said it was public domain and on the image upload page everything was checked out well.
What/where is NIST release 31? Is there a web page other than https://archive.org/details/nist-911 that claims all of these images to be in the public domain? Belbury (talk) 18:01, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:2022 LGBT Pride Valladolid 07.jpg[edit]

Derivative work of a copyrighted banner A1Cafel (talk) 08:25, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Which is the copyright banner? MiguelAlanCS (talk) 13:00, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Virgin and Elizabeth, Mohammad Zaman, 1678-79.png[edit]

I did not secure proper permission for it before uploading it. I just screenshotted it from someone's paper Footpathandstile (talk) 08:29, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Img mrtn.jpg[edit]

Osobní fotka Matatata 1 (talk) 08:40, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


File:The Lego Universe.jpg[edit]

Image repeatadly used in vandalism, self promotion, and scams. Deleting this image and banning the offending user will make it more difficult for them to continue their activities in the future. Wincent01 (talk) 08:49, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:東京街頭-秋葉原Starbucks (52657154841).jpg[edit]

Copyrighted logo of starbucks and the copyrighted artwork on the cup A1Cafel (talk) 08:52, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


File:Collection Pierre Fabre.jpg[edit]

Copyright Infringement Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:57, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Shikh Muhammad Awwamah.jpg[edit]

صورة لها حقوق Mohammed Qays (talk) 09:07, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:GEqr4KFaEAEoNKw.jpg[edit]

Jaxa images are not Public domain Artem.G (talk) 09:10, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


File:Nova rocket full.png[edit]

No indication that it's licensed under CC-By 4.0 licence, source is https://www.stokespace.com/rocket/. Artem.G (talk) 09:14, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


File:Pelzsalon Herbert Perschke, Wuppertal-Vohwinkel (Web-Einnäh-Etikett).jpg[edit]

This file was initially tagged by Wdwd as Logo Kürschner (talk) 09:26, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

KEEP. Ein einfaches Textlogo, nur Schrift, ohne schützenswerte Teile. -- Kürschner (talk) 09:27, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Info: Es ist mehr als nur das Ist ein Foto mit kmplexen Hintergrund und Lizenz dazu fehlt.--Wdwd (talk) 09:38, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment The question is whether the script font is sufficiently more individual than this uncopyrightable file to exceed COM:TOO Germany. Both use distinctive fonts, and I don't know what German jurisprudence on script fonts is like. Does anyone reading know? For the record, I do think that script font has more individuality, so absent any more relevant evidence, I'd support deletion as a precaution. I guess the other issue is, why do we think the photo is not copyrighted? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:31, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
German Wikipedia says: This logo consists only of simple geometric shapes and text. It does not reach the level of creativity (more specific description in English) required for copyright protection and is therefore in the public domain. Although it is free of copyright restrictions, the image may still be subject toother restrictions. -- Kürschner (talk) 08:27, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
What about the photo? Why would the photo not be copyrighted? Also, I did read at least a rough translation of the German-language discussion before I posted, but I'm not convinced the script font is uncopyrightable in Germany. Why are you sure of that? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:28, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:The State Council (47954035406).jpg[edit]

There is no Freedom of Panorama in Oman; therefore, this commercially-licensed image infringes the government building architect's copyright. The building was completed in 2013 and was "designed by q-dar and built by Carillion Alawi." JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 09:35, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


File:Yevgeny Kobylyanski in 2014.jpg[edit]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kxf4YiLBHr8 - правообладатель: http://minimalTV.org Engelberthumperdink (talk) 09:37, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Council of State of Oman.jpg[edit]

Same no-FoP issue as Commons:Deletion requests/File:The State Council (47954035406).jpg. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 09:42, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


File:Pelz- und Ledermoden Darida, in Ebingen (Web-Einnäh-Etikett).jpg[edit]

Missing permission for photo (Photos from ebay are not in public domain) Wdwd (talk) 09:46, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dieses Logo besteht nur aus einfachen geometrischen Formen und Text. Es erreicht keine Schöpfungshöhe (spezifischere Beschreibung auf Englisch), die für urheberrechtlichen Schutz nötig ist, und ist daher gemeinfrei. Obwohl es zwar frei von urheberrechtlichen Beschränkungen ist, kann das Bild dennoch anderen Beschränkungen unterliegen. Siehe WP:PD § Fonts oder Template talk:PD-textlogo für weitere Informationen.
Es geht nicht um das dargestellte Werk bzw. Logo, sondern um das Foto. Und das ist kein einfacher "2D-Scan" sondern ein eigenständiges Werk, samt der "kreativen" Ausleuchtung und Falten. Und für dieses Foto (laut Quellenangabe von ebay kopiert) fehlt die Freigabe vom Fotografen/Rechteinhaber.--Wdwd (talk) 11:56, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nein, die Kopie einer Abbildung ist als solche nicht urheberrechtsgeschützt, ob gemalt, gedruckt oder gewebt. Hier ist keinerlei kreative Arbeit des Fotografen vorhanden. -- Kürschner (talk) 12:58, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Page.jpg[edit]

own work? Looks like recent commercial comic drawings to me Mateus2019 (talk) 09:52, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Crocus City Hall 2020 (uncropped).jpg[edit]

How does the website of the Moscow region government from 2020 own the copyright to a photograph published in 2019 on VKontakte? Time Machine? License laundering? Engelberthumperdink (talk) 09:55, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Flag1789.png[edit]

thers planty of beter images of the franch flag איש עיטי (talk) 10:50, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Seems be spam Wizardofwords25 (talk) 02:27, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files in Category:Paintings in the Usher Art Gallery, Lincoln[edit]

These two files were uploaded to Flickr by John Lord as cc-by-2.0. However copyright is still held by the artist or artist's estate, as Tacita Dean is still alive, and Lowry died in 1976, less than 70 years ago. Therefore these files are ineligible for use on Commons.

Voice of Clam 10:55, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Routes of Advance to Rhine River from Prum-Bitung Area - NARA - 100384467 (page 1).jpg[edit]

Appears to be a de facto 1:1 duplicate of File:Routes of Advance to Rhine River from Prum-Bitung Area - NARA - 100384467 (page 2).jpg, only the map has a slightly different rotation. TheImaCow (talk) 11:20, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This one is straighter; the Page 2 scan is rotated a bit. I would delete the other. Both are there on NARA, unsure if the bot would just re-upload or not. Carl Lindberg (talk) 11:45, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Paikkari Lönnrot statue front.jpg[edit]

Derivative work of Finnish sculptor Eino Räsänen (Wikidata:Q11857186), died in 1970, not PD yet, no freedom of Panorama for sculptures in Finland. Htm (talk) 12:06, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


File:Paikkari Lönnrot statue side.jpg[edit]

Derivative work of Finnish sculptor Eino Räsänen (Wikidata:Q11857186), died in 1970, not PD yet, no freedom of Panorama for sculptures in Finland. Htm (talk) 12:06, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


File:Kyiv - Parlament 250502.jpg[edit]

There is no commercial Freedom of Panorama in Ukraine. The architect isn't yet dead for more than 70 years, so this building is unfree to be distributed under commercial licensing. Dozens of images of this building were deleted in the past: Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Verkhovna Rada and Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Verkhovna Rada building. Unsure if this is a reupload of File:Kyiv - Verkhovna rada.jpg, as both images were uploaded by the same uploader. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 12:09, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


File:Bhidauni Potna Pond.jpg[edit]

Out of project scope? Taivo (talk) 12:12, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Age Bakker.jpg[edit]

no permission no author no metadata and copyvio from https://www.mejudice.nl/auteurs/detail/age-bakker Hoyanova (talk) 12:29, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:LucyBarfield.jpg[edit]

Dubious PD claim. If the author is unknown (as stated), it's not clear how we also know that the author died over 70 years ago (the reason given for saying that this image is in the PD). Hoary (talk) 12:40, 3 April 2024 (UTC) Nomination withdrawn Hoary (talk) 22:29, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

1947 was 77 years ago. Check this list out, List of countries' copyright lengths For UK it says "70 years if the author is unknown." This does fall under the UK's public domain laws btw, since this was taken in England. (talk) 14:15, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Now that TreeElf has changed the reason for claiming that the image is in the PD, I withdraw this nomination. -- Hoary (talk) 22:29, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This one might be OK, but TreeElf has a history of uploading incorrect licenses it seems. Someone might want to sit down and explain copyright to user. Cheers, Nesnad (talk) 04:15, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Researched this more. Seems like a delete maybe? The Guardian Gives this a citation of ownership etc, so author unknown is unlikely. I'm not too familar with UK copyright, so maybe it is OK because of age? But claiming it is author unknown seems deceptive. Ref: Article in the Guardian with this image ... Nesnad (talk) 14:05, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Logo Lamborghini 2024.png[edit]

Copyrighted Lamborghini badge logo. メイド理世 (talk) 13:48, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dániel Horogszegi Szilágyi-Landeck.jpg[edit]

no permission from given author see metadata which read (C) Jeroen van der Meyde, Contact information jeroen@fotogeniek.nl www.fotogeniek.nl Berkstraat 13 Den Haag, , 2565MR Nederland 0653896103 Hoyanova (talk) 13:51, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dániel Horogszegi Szilágyi-Landeck © Jeroen van der Meyde.jpg[edit]

no permission from given author see metadata which read (C) Jeroen van der Meyde, Contact information jeroen@fotogeniek.nl www.fotogeniek.nl Berkstraat 13 Den Haag, , 2565MR Nederland 0653896103 Hoyanova (talk) 13:52, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files found with Special:Search/"Border Roads Organisation license"[edit]

The requirement for accurate reproduction in the license is a non-free restriction on derivative works and fails COM:L. The GODL does not apply to names, crests, logos and other official symbols of the data provider(s).

AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 14:48, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@AntiCompositeNumber Leaving GODL aside, the license of the department (https://www.bro.gov.in/index2.asp?slid=3746&sublinkid=28&lang=1) which is the same as the licenses of defence institutions in India allows free usage. Leoneix (talk) 15:06, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Musa Rabile God.jpg[edit]

The source site has an explicit copyright notice. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:00, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep The rote copyright notices that appear on all websites only covers their original text. When they republish an historic image it does not restart the copyright clock. --RAN (talk) 23:23, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Koninklijke Commissie voor Toponymie 1979.pdf[edit]

Slechts één opmerkelijke zin, dus verwijderen Verloren16 (talk) 15:07, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Camaru Festival.jpg[edit]

No permission from the source A1Cafel (talk) 15:14, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:VEB Pelzbekleidung Delitzsch (Web-Einnäh-Etikett).jpg[edit]

Missing correct information about the author (who take the photo?) and missing license for the photo. Wdwd (talk) 15:23, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Einfache Kopie, in meinem Auftrag angefertigt, ohne weiteren schöpferischen Wert. -- Kürschner (talk) 17:08, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pelze Lieder, Garmisch-Partenkichen (Pelz-Web-Einnäh-Etikett).jpg[edit]

Missing permission (Author is not the uploader) and missing license for the photo. Wdwd (talk) 15:28, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

KEEP. Das Foto hat keinerlei schöpferischen Wert und fällt damit nicht unter die von Commons festgelegten Bestimmungen. -- Kürschner (talk) 07:03, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Doch, das Foto erreicht Schöpfungshöhe. Und genau für das Foto (nicht Logo) fehlt die Freigabe/Lizenz. Das dargestellte/abgebildete Logo erreicht meiner Meinung eher keine Schöpfungshöhe, da ansich eher einfacher Schriftzug.--Wdwd (talk) 10:40, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Elkán Á & P, IV. Váci Utca 1 (1921).jpg[edit]

According to the given informations, author of the the artwork (poster) died 1964 -> Missing permission for shown artwork. Can be undeleted 2035 Wdwd (talk) 15:33, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ok! -- Kürschner (talk) 17:34, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hduti ,j.h, Parliament 2022.svg[edit]

does not match with the actual results of the British House of ommons, fantasy parties Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 15:43, 3 April 2024 (UTC) Commons:Deletion requests/File:Kotak 003.jpg[reply]

File:Bad Elster Das heilende Radon.jpg[edit]

Das ist Werbung für eine pseudowissenschaftliche Therapie. Grassel123 (talk) 16:39, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ist aber kein Löschgrund. --Achim55 (talk) 17:39, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Das Foto ist keine Werbung für "Das heilende Radon", zumindest nicht in Wikipedia, sondern ein Blick in die reale Welt. Es gibt in Zentraleuropa 12 Radonbäder: "Ein Ursache-Wirkungsmechanismus, der eine mögliche positive Wirkung von Radonkuren erklärt, ist bislang nicht bekannt. Dennoch berichten Patienten von deutlichen Minderungen ihrer Beschwerden. Diese Diskrepanz zwischen subjektivem (Patienten)Empfinden und objektiver (wissenschaftlicher) Erklärung ist noch nicht zufriedenstellend erklärt." Sollten wir das in der WP verschweigen? Wenn wir alles Pseudowissenschaftliche aus der Wikipedia entfernen würden, wäre sie viel schlanker. Das Foto ist seit dem 22. Dez. 2017 in der WP und sollte dort bleiben. --Roderich Kahn (talk) 15:37, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Wie die umworbene Therapie von Dritten beurteilt wird, ist doch für die Existenz der Bilddatei irrelevant.--Lysippos (talk) 17:39, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


File:Love Death and Robots Logopgn.webp[edit]

Copyrighted content under wrong license 3dollarsinmybankaccount (talk) 17:16, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment The text is definitely PD-text. I'm not sure about the three symbols; they might be considered PD-shape but it may be too stylized with the "blood splatters". 11icewing (talk) 13:25, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Flags of communes of Haiti[edit]

There is only one Flag here, and that flag is likely fake. Eehuiio (talk) 17:33, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The departments of Haiti didn't even have their own flags. The flag of Navassa deleted already Alexphangia Talk 18:27, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete It seems the same user has uploaded other non-exiting flags of subdivisions for random countries. I see no reason to believe these are anymore genuine then the others. --Adamant1 (talk) 03:58, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


File:Esther Nisenthal Krinitz.jpg[edit]

copyright violation; artist died in 2001; pd in April 2071. Martin Sg. (talk) 18:55, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Vitold Muratov (talk · contribs)[edit]

Very low quality private (mostly nude) amateur photographs by non-notable photographer. Unused, no educational value, out of project scope..

VLu (talk) 14:28, 8 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 12:06, 15 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Vitold Muratov (talk · contribs)[edit]

Another batch, the same rationale: Very low quality private (including nude) amateur photographs by non-notable photographer. Unused, no educational value, out of project scope.

VLu (talk) 16:15, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 02:40, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Vitold Muratov (talk · contribs)[edit]

Another batch, the same rationale: Very low quality private (including nude) amateur photographsof non-notable people made by a non-notable photographer. Unused, no educational value, out of project scope.

VLu (talk) 16:02, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Campfire in the rain.jpg in use in ru:Экологический туризм в России, File:Brothers at summer cottage.jpg in use in Italian Wiktionary --Butko (talk) 06:50, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 01:42, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Vitold Muratov (talk · contribs)[edit]

Personal/Private photo. COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST.

Mitte27 (talk) 19:02, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kristen Stewart and Rose Glass at Berlinale 2024 (cropped).tif[edit]

It is a bad crop. The file isn't used in any Wikipediapage. I made a better crop from my picture File:Kristen Stewart at Berlinale 2024 cropped 1.tif Elena Ternovaja (talk) 19:20, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There can be more than one version of a file, this one is not a "bad crop", and your crop "isn't used in any Wikipediapage" either. If you don't like others editing the files you uploaded, you shouldn't be uploading anything here. --Nyxaros (talk) 21:11, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files in Category:Hauptgebäude Bauhaus-Universität Weimar[edit]

copyvio; artist died in 1966; no fop.

Martin Sg. (talk) 19:25, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files in Category:Hauptgebäude Bauhaus-Universität Weimar[edit]

copyvio; artists died in 1965 / 1974; no fop.

Martin Sg. (talk) 19:35, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Weimar-Bauhaus Universität DSC9172.jpg[edit]

File:Weimar Germany Bauhaus-University-06.jpg[edit]

copyvio; Artist Beyer died in 1985; no fop. (see https://www.uni-weimar.de/de/universitaet/profil/unesco-welterbe/hauptgebaeude/ no. 6 / 7) Martin Sg. (talk) 19:30, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:John Hnatyshyn (Senator) Canada (1907-1967).jpg[edit]

I found the photo at Find A Grave, which mentions it was uploaded in 2009, long before the 2022 upload. Is the FindAGrave user the same as the Commons user, or was it ripped from there, falsely increased resolution and colourized? I also found it at ParlInfo. I have my doubts about the Own Work status, but if it real is it can be kept. Clarification is gladly needed. PascalHD (talk) 19:34, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files in Category:Range Rover Evoque Land Rover MENA publicity photos[edit]

Not the work of Land Rover MENA - Getty Images photos accidentally Flickrwashed by Land Rover's regional Flickr account.

Adeletron 3030 (talk) 19:40, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gertmilkdale Bill Clinton.jpg[edit]

Out of scope: fictitious document with no obvious educational purpose. Omphalographer (talk) 20:34, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:PBS Kids Go! logo (2022).png[edit]

False logo uploaded by user with history of uploading hoax logos for PBS Kids/Sprout. I used Tineye on the image and all instances of this logo have a thick black outline around the speech bubble. So this is probably a hoax too. William Graham (talk) 20:48, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Uploader has history of uploading hoax logos. I can't find any use of this color way in Tineye. -- William Graham (talk) 20:50, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Minimalistic map of the world.svg[edit]

Out of scope: unusable map in black/white Enyavar (talk) 20:57, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

According to what rules is this card removed? Devlet Geray (talk) 20:05, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It doesn't convey any educational information. I assume the colored original once showed "linguistic families"; but this black-and-white version has no informational value. At best, it's abstract art. --Enyavar (talk) 20:32, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:WWE Raw is War Logo 2019.svg[edit]

Hoax logo or fan art, never used by WWE/WWF. Uploader has history of hoax logo uploads. William Graham (talk) 21:00, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User:FurryManforme1976[edit]

FurryManforme1976_Portrait_Picture.jpg FurryManforme1976 (talk) 21:02, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


File:Hisham esserify.jpg[edit]

Is he in scope? 45.250.252.152 21:11, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hisham Esserify.jpg[edit]

Is he in scope? 45.250.252.152 21:12, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hisham karim.jpg[edit]

Is he in scope? 45.250.252.152 21:13, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hisham-Al-Shirawi.jpg[edit]

Is he in scope? 45.250.252.152 21:13, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mgv-photo.jpg[edit]

Is it an own work? 45.250.252.152 21:14, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Forbes 2014.jpg[edit]

Is it an own work? 45.250.252.152 21:15, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pengasas ANIMAS.jpg[edit]

Is it an own work? 45.250.252.152 21:16, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:005 20201029 (c)schedl Walter Peer2020-11-02.jpg[edit]

possible copyvio (c) Ludwig Schedl M2k~dewiki (talk) 21:24, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Julien Gault pour un shooting photo de David Gomez à Montpellier en 2012.png[edit]

Je suis l'homme sur la photo et je ne souhaite plus qu'elle soit publiée sur internet Lukkas75 (talk) 22:32, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cathédrale Saint-Paul Liège 04.jpg[edit]

FOP in Belgium doesn't cover building interiors and this map is probably copyrighted. So the image should be deleted as COPYVIO unless someone can provide evidence to the contrary. Adamant1 (talk) 22:40, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Vista semi - frontal de la iglesia de San Martín Obispo de Tours en 1920.jpg[edit]

Presenta una alteración en la calidad de la imagen y existe otro archivo muy similar a otro archivo de la misma categoría "San Martín de las Pirámides" Carlos Felipe G (talk) 22:50, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


File:Vista hacia el sur de San Martín de las Pirámides a inicios del siglo pasado.jpg[edit]

El archivo tiene granulado lo que dificulta su apreciación, en este caso del lugar, y es muy posible que no sea el lugar que dice ser la fotografía (San Martín de las Pirámides) Carlos Felipe G (talk) 22:55, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Files in Category:Archéoforum[edit]

Unfortunately FOP in Belgium doesn't cover building interiors, which is where these photographs were taken. So the images should be deleted as COPYVIO unless someone can provide to the contrary.

Adamant1 (talk) 22:56, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cathédrale Saint-Paul Liège 09.jpg[edit]

FOP in Belgium doesn't cover building interiors and this map is probably copyrighted. So the image should be deleted as COPYVIO unless someone can provide evidence to the contrary. Adamant1 (talk) 23:04, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cathédrale Saint-Paul Liège 39.jpg[edit]

FOP in Belgium doesn't cover building interiors and this sign is probably copyrighted. So the image should be deleted as COPYVIO unless someone can provide evidence to the contrary. Adamant1 (talk) 23:04, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Advocata[edit]

Several watermarked as coming from MyHeritage, and File:Lord and Lady Mountbatten with VK Krishna Menon; Prince Philip following.jpg has watermarks all across the image. File:VK Krishna Menon and Queen Elizabeth II.jpg has already been deleted as a screengrab from Youtube, some of these images look like they are probably are too but I don't see why I should waste time finding the source for every one when it's clear these uploads aren't "Own work" as claimed. Some of the images appear to be quite old and possibly may be free of copyright restrictions, but since the uploader deliberately hasn't provided us with the actual sources it's impossible to check easily. --Kathleen's bike (talk) 23:00, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files in Category:Tourist signs in Brussels[edit]

Unfortunately FOP in Belgium doesn't cover building interiors and these signs are probably copyrighted. So the images should be deleted as COPYVIO unless someone can provide evidence to the contrary.

Adamant1 (talk) 23:18, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@IronGargoyle: Is that not a window with a building outside of it in the first image? Also it looks like the other two images are lit with indoor lighting. --Adamant1 (talk) 01:46, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The glass in the first image shows the reflection of a building and sign behind the photographer. Note the reversed text, indicating a mirror image. As for the second two, I can't speak for why that looks like interior lighting to you, but there are cobblestone streets and the weathering pattern on the signs clearly indicates they are outdoors. IronGargoyle (talk) 01:56, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
There's such a thing as cobble paths indoors. It doesn't look like the path or paint job on the wall has the weathering r wear and tear to be consistent with it being outdoors either. There's essentially zero weathering what-so-ever on either one. --Adamant1 (talk) 02:33, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The weathering is likely rust and can be clearly seen if you zoom in to the edges of the sign. Of course a wall and cobblestone sidewalk are not going to have rust (though there is other weathering to been seen if you zoom in). In addition, tourist signs like this are also almost always outdoors. The sign refers to a specific building, which would make the most sense to be placed outside the building in question. IronGargoyle (talk) 03:15, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not sure what your talking with the rust. If you look at the bar in the top of the first image some of the paint is chipped off and it doesn't look rusty underneath. It's not like that's the only kind of weathering anyway though or that rusting can't happen indoors. --Adamant1 (talk) 03:24, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
BTW, if you look at this image from Street View there's a sign almost exactly like this one inside of the building to the side of the word "personal" painted on the window. I'm not saying it's the exact sign, but they clearly have inside and the wall looks like it has the same yellow paint job. So it's not that much of a stretch. --Adamant1 (talk) 03:36, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The link you sent doesn't work. That aside, rusting happens WAY faster outdoors because of the salt and water and that weathering looks very much like rust. The color is right and the pattern of infiltration is right. Furthermore, yellow walls with light grey stone at the base and square cobbles are exactly what you find on the exterior of the Berlaymont Building (File:Brussels Schuman monument.jpg). IronGargoyle (talk) 04:20, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files in Category:Khor Fakkan Amphitheatre[edit]

There is no Freedom of Panorama in the UAE. The work dates to 2020 and is authored by Dar Al Omran Planning, Architecture, Engineering. (source) Under the amphitheater designer's copyright.

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 23:56, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Deletion_requests/2024/04/03&oldid=874904140"